(Re-)Imagining the Nation: the Indian Historical Novel in English, 1900-2000
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Negotiating History, (Re-)imagining the Nation: The Indian Historical Novel in English, 1900-2000 by Md. Rezaul Haque Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics (The University of Sydney, 2004) Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English, Creative Writing and Australian Studies Flinders University, South Australia June 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction (6-45) Chapter 1 (46-92) Fiction, History and Nation in India Chapter 2 (93-137) The Emergence of Indian Historical Fiction: The Colonial Context Chapter 3 (138-162) Revivalist Historical Fiction 1: Padmini: An Indian Romance (1903) Chapter 4 (163-205) Revivalist Historical Fiction 2: Nur Jahan: The Romance of an Indian Queen (1909) Chapter 5 (206-241) Nationalist History Fiction 1: Kanthapura (1938) Chapter 6 (242-287) Nationalist History Fiction 2: The Lalu Trilogy (1939-42) Chapter 7 (288-351) Feminist History Fiction: Some Inner Fury (1955) Chapter 8 (352-391) Interventionist History Fiction: The Shadow Lines (1988) Chapter 9 (392-436) Revisionist Historical Fiction: The Devil’s Wind (1972) Conclusion (437-446) Bibliography (447-468) 2 Thesis Summary As the title of my project suggests, this thesis deals with Indian historical fiction in English. While the time frame in the title may lead one to expect that the present study will attempt a historical overview of the Indian historical novel written in English, that is not a primary concern. Rather, I pose two broad questions: the first asks, to what uses does Indian English fiction put the Indian past as it is remembered in both formal history and communal memory? The second question is perhaps a more important one so far as this project is concerned: why does the Indian English novel use the Indian past in the ways that it does? There is as a consequence an intention to move from the inner world of Indian historical fiction to the outer space of the socio-political reality from which the novel under consideration has been produced. In other words, I read the literary text in the light of the social text. Like several other sub-genres of Indian fiction in English, the Indian historical novel emerged first during the colonial period. Both its formal and thematic concerns are thus to a large extent shaped in the pre-independence period by the long shadows of the British colonisation of India. The two types of historical fiction written under an oppressive colonial regime—revivalist and nationalist—are geared to regenerating and constructing cultural/national identity/self. That is to say, the pre-independence Indian historical novel uses Indian history/past to imagine the nation. Many of the inequalities that the political birth of the Indian nation-state was expected to remove have remained. Even more than half a century after the British had 3 left India, minorities are still ill-treated; casteism is still rampant; discrimination against women is still commonplace. Post-independence Indian historical fiction engages with Indian history/past to retrieve the voices of these subalterns. In challenging the bourgeois-patriarchal hegemony of the nation, the historical novel of the post-independence period sets out to re-imagine the nation in two notable ways, generating in the process the two most remarkable varieties of post-independence historical fiction: feminist and interventionist. A third type is revisionist which focuses on the politics of colonial representation rather than the re-imagining of the nation. From a contextual reading of seven historical novels in this study, I conclude that Indian historical fiction in English uses Indian history/past both to construct and deconstruct the Indian cultural/national self. 4 Acknowledgements This research project has been a long journey. Without the kind advice, sharp criticism, constant encouragement, insightful guidance, and ready help from my immediate family here in Adelaide (Momo, Rhidia, and Mubtasim) and my extended family overseas (parents, brothers, and sisters); friends and well-wishers (Diana, Gillian, Nena, Rumi, Savvy, Shahjahan, Shamu, Sue, and Syd); a number of decision-makers and implementers at Flinders University, South Australia, notably Karen Jacobs, Jeri Kroll, Richard Maltby, and Robert Phiddian; the lovingly efficient Veronica at the Central Library; my wonderful supervisors (Rick Hosking and Kate Douglas); my teachers (Debra Aarons, Fakrul Alam, A.K.M. Rezaul Karim, Ingrid Piller, and the late Aali Areefur Rehman), it would have been impossible to come out unscathed through all the confusions, misgivings, and setbacks on the way home. I thank them all, sincerely. An earlier version of chapter 5 appeared as an article titled ‘The Nation and One of Its Fragments in Kanthapura’ in Transnational Literature (vol. 4, no. 1, November 2011) and went on to win the Best Student Research Paper Award 2011 in the Faculty of Education, Humanities and Law at Flinders University, South Australia. I am deeply indebted to my principal supervisor, Rick Hosking, and the anonymous reviewers of the article whose astute comments and suggestions went a long way towards shaping the argument I have finally been able to construct in both the article and the chapter in which it appears. 5 Declaration I certify that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and that to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Signature: _______________ Date: __________ 6 Negotiating History, (Re-)imagining the Nation: The Indian Historical Novel in English, 1900-2000 INTRODUCTION Since the interpretation of history is itself historically situated, the historical reference of the historical novel is double: not only is the past seen through the prism of the present, it also serves present interests. David Roberts1 The academy, media and political arena have been all shaped in recent times by the ‘history wars.’2 Although I believe I am a peace-loving person, though not exactly a Gandhian pacifist, my research requires I come to grips with this particular kind of war in some detail. I am doubly obliged to embark on such an undertaking because both my research location (an Australian public university) and research focus (representation of history in Indian English fiction) have been sites of some of the fiercest battles over the question of history and historiography. That it should be so comes as no surprise, for both history and historiography have always been contested terrains whose capture has been of 1 David Roberts, ‘The Modern German Historical Novel: An Introduction,’ in The Modern German Historical Novel: Paradigms, Problems, Perspectives, eds. David Roberts and Philip Thomson (New York and Oxford: Berg, 1991) 3. 2 The term ‘history wars’ was coined in the US and became popular on the eve of the fiftieth anniversary in 1995 of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For an overview of the ‘history wars’ in the US, see History Wars: The Enola Gay and Other Battles for the American Past, eds. Edward T. Linenthal and Tom Engelhardt (New York: Metropolitan Books, 1996). 7 crucial importance to totalitarianism in all its shades.3 At the same time, however, engaging history is no less empowering. If anti-colonial nationalisms all over the world had one common political agenda, it was the rewriting of the history produced by the colonial masters. At the turn of the nineteenth century, for example, the Bengali/Indian nationalist, Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay, was heard clamouring for a history of/for the Bengalis. Without history, according to Bankimchandra, there was no way out for the Bengalis from colonial subjugation. In wanting a historical discourse of, by, and for the Bengalis/Indians, as Vinay Lal has succinctly put it: [. .] Bankim was giving expression to the sentiments of many nationalists and modernizers who agonized over India’s enslavement and the lack of a historical literature, and who saw in those twin deficiencies, which had to be overcome, an inescapable connection.4 And the centrality of revisionist history in feminist movements is too well known to bear repetition.5 3 In her memoir, Bryher, cited in Diana Wallace, The Woman’s Historical Novel: British Women Writers, 1900-2000 (Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005) 2, notes the ban that Benito Mussolini imposed on the study of history by women at the universities in pre-war fascist Italy. 4 Vinay Lal, The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India (2003; New Delhi: Oxford UP, 2007) 80. See also Ranajit Guha, An Indian Historiography of India: A Nineteenth-Century Agenda and Its Implications, S.G. Deuskar Lectures on Indian History (Calcutta: K.P. Bagchi & Co., 1988); Sudipta Kaviraj, The Unhappy Consciousness: Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay and the Formation of Nationalist Discourse in India (Delhi: Oxford UP, 1995). 5 See, for example, Judith M. Bennett, History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006). 8 History Wars in Australia In most countries that have witnessed history wars, these wars have been fought along three shared fronts. First, a dominant and reassuring myth was challenged and gave way to a less savoury one, or just fell apart. In the Australian context, for instance, the heartening image of European settlement beginning in the late eighteenth century was cracked open to expose how it had meant the deprivation and displacement of the Indigenous population. In his six-volume History of Australia, Manning Clark demolished a whole set of what Graeme Turner calls ‘national fictions,’ so much so that a reviewer of the fifth volume of History published in 1981 went so far as to remark that it was a ‘bitter and cynical’ history produced by ‘a man who hates his own society.’6 The controversy reached its peak as the nation arrived at celebrating the Bicentenary of the white occupation of Australia in 1988.