DOCSLIB.ORG

Index to Scientific Names of Amphibians and Reptiles for Volume 35 (2000)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index to Scientific Names of Amphibians and Reptiles for Volume 35 (2000) Bull. Chicago Herp. Soc. 35(12):292-296, 2000 Index to Scientific Names of Amphibians and Reptiles for Volume 35 (2000) January 1-16 April 65-92 July 157-176 October 221-248 February 17-40 May 93-140 August 177-200 November 249-276 March 41-64 June 141-156 September 201-220 December 277-300 Abronia imbricata Callisaurus exsanguis 182 deppei 142 ciliaris 70, 77, 181, 182 draconoides 202 gularis 181, 288 graminea 70, 77 imbricata 70, 77, 142 bogerti 70, 77 gularis 70, 77 Acanthodactylus 149 levicollis 181, 182 brevipes 70, 77 scalaris 70, 78 Acris crepitans 243 rudicollis 142 draconoides 70, 77 semiannulatus 70, 78 Acrochordus arafurae 17 Basiliscus vittatus 70, 77 inusitatus 70, 77 septemvittatus 21 Adelophis copei 73, 81 Bipes canaliculatus 70, 77 Candoia 241 subsp. nov. 70, 78 Adelphicos nigrilatus 73, 81 Bitis aspera 241 guttatus Afrovenator 6, 30 caudalis 57 bibroni 241 flavilineatus 70, 78 Agalychnis gabonica 115 carinata 241 guttatus 70, 78 callidryas 67 Boa 241 Caretta caretta 58, 69, 76, 273 immutabilis 70, 78 moreleti 67 constrictor Celestus enneagrammus 70, 77 hyperythrus beldingi 70, 78 Agamura persica 265 amarali 263 Cerastes inornatus 181 Agkistrodon imperator 73, 81 cerastes 57 heptagrammus 182 bilineatus bilineatus 73, 81 Bogertophis 211 gasperettii 57 laredoensis 288 Alligator mississippiensis 171 rosaliae 211 vipera 57 ocellifer 36 Alytes subocularis 211 Ceratophrys cranwelli 35 sacki gigas 70, 78 cisternasii 288 subocularis 19, 20 Cerrophidion godmani 73, 81 sonorae 182, 254 obstetricans 213, 288 Boiga irregularis 135, 242 Chamaeleolis 9 tesselatus 181 Ambystoma Bolitoglossa Chamaelinorops 9 tigris 202 altamiranoi 142 platydactyla 67 Chameleo aethiops 152 californiense 151 rufescens 67 chamaeleon 36 marmoratus 152, 182 maculatum 130 Bombina 4 (Trioceros) jacksonii 187 punctilinealis 152 mexicanum 67, 142 Bothrops 100, 115 Charina septentrionalis 152 ordinarium 67 asper 73, 81, 100, 103, 104 bottae 171 uniparens 182 rivulare 142 insularis 101 umbratica 243 Coleonyx rosaceum 67 nasutum 100 reinhardtii 171 brevis 70, 78, 181, 182 taylori 67 Bufo 65, 67 trivirgata 171 elegans elegans 70, 78 tigrinum velascoi 67 alvarius 56, 257, 261 Chelydra Colostethus zempoalaense 142 americanus 129, 152 serpentina 149, 206, 229 brunneus 149 Ameiva cognatus 56, 67, 162 serpentina 230, 231 mcdiarmidi 149 ameiva 36 compactilis 67 Chersodromus liebmanni 73, 81 trilineatus 149 undulata cycladen 67 Chiropterotriton Coluber podarga 70, 77 debilis 67 chiropterus 67, 142 constrictor 241 sinistra 70, 77 debilis 67 chondrostegus 67 constrictor 160 Anelytropsis papillosus 70, 77 insidior 162 cracens 67 mormon 173 Anniella pulchra pulchra 70, 77 fowleri 129 magnipes 67 oaxaca 73, 81 Anolis gemmifer 67 multidentatus 67 priapus 173 carolinensis 58, 173, 202, 222 kelloggi 67 sp. 67 Coniophanes carolinensis 70, 77 marinus 67 Chlamydosaurus kingii 10 fissidens proterops 73, 81 sagrei 222 marmoreus 67 Chrysemys imperialis sagrei 173 mazatlanensis 67 picta clavatus 73, 82 Anotheca spinosa 67 microscaphus mexicanus 67, 162 bellii 229, 230, 231, 234 imperialis 73, 82 Apalone 236 occidentalis 67 marginata 229, 230, 232, 234 quinquevittatus 73, 82 spinifera 233 perplexus 68 Claudius angustatus 69, 76 Conophis emoryi 69, 76 punctatus 56, 68, 162 Clelia lineatus Archaeoraptor 52 speciosus 68 clelia 100 concolor 73, 82 Arizona tacanensis 68 clelia 73, 81 lineatus 73, 82 elegans terrestrialis 129 Clemmys guttata 130 vittatus elegans 73, 81 terrestris 222 Clonophis kirtlandii 141 viduus 73, 82 expolita 73, 81 valliceps 68 Cnemidophorus 151 vittatus 73, 82 Ascaphus 11 woodhousi australis 68 deppei Conopsis truei 11, 152 woodhousii australis 162, 163 deppei 70, 77 biserialis 73, 82, 142 Barisia Bungarus walli 210 infernalis 70, 77 lineatus 73, 82 292 nasus dickersonae 201-204 nitidus yniphora 174 labialis 19, 20 nebrius 201 nitidis 68 Geophis nasus 20, 73, 82, 142 reticulatus 70, 78 petersi 68 blanchardi 74, 82 Cophosaurus vestigium 203 occidentalis 68 dugesi dugesi 74, 82 texanus Ctenosaura pallidus 68 multitorques 74, 82 scitulus 70, 78, 182 acanthura 70, 78 pipilans nebulans 68 semidoliatus 74, 82 texanus 70, 78 hemilopha interrupta 70, 78 planirostris 222 Gerrhonotus Corallus 241 pectinata 70, 78, 236 rhodopis 68 liocephalus loweryi 71, 78 hortulanus 264 similis similis 70, 78 rugulosus 68 Gonatodes Cordylus 277, 278, 279 Cuora trifasciata 57 tarahumaraensis 68 hasemani 172 cataphractus 277 Dasypeltis scabra 57 terestes 68 humeralis 172 giganteus 277-280 Dendrobates 5 verruculatus 68 Goniourosaurus luii 273 macropholis 242 auratus 241 vocalis 68 Gonyosoma 211 warreni 277 vanzolinii 12 Emydoidea blandingii 273 Gopherus depressus 277 Dermochelys coriacea 173 Epicrates 241 agassizii 252, 257, 260 Crocodylus Dermophis mexicanus 67 Epipedobates bolivianus 149 berlandieri 69,76 acutus 242 Diadophis punctatus dugesi 142 Eryx 171 polyphemus 57 acutus 69, 76 Dicamptodon tenebrosus 171 Eublepharis 265 Gyalopion intermedius 272 Dinilysia 58 macularius 273 canum 12, 74, 82 johnstoni 62 Dispholidus typus 61 Eumeces quadrangulare 74, 82 porosus 62 Draco 271 brevirostris Heloderma 263 Crotalus palawanensis 271 bilineatus 70, 78, 183 horridum horridum 71, 78 adamanteus 94, 102, 103, 107, 108, Dryadophis brevirostris 70, 78 suspectum 249, 257 117, 151, 270 melanolomus dicei 70, 78 Hemidactylus atrox 19, 22, 41, 73, 82, 151, 159, stuarti 73, 82 indubitus 70, 78 frenatus 71, 78 249, 251, 252, 255, 258, veraecrucis 73, 82 copei 70, 78, 142 turcicus 149, 222 260, 261, 262 Drymarchon dugesi 70, 78 turcicus 71, 78 durissus 103 corais fasciatus 222 Heterodon totonacus 73, 82 erebennus 73, 82 lynxe nasicus 20 tzabcan 73, 82 melanurus 73, 82 belli 70, 78 kennerlyi 20, 74, 82 horridus 94, 102-104, 109, 110, rubidus 73, 82 lynxe 70, 78 nasicus 20 115-117, 124, 151 unicolor 73, 82 obsoletus 71, 78, 183 simus 94, 113, 120 atricaudatus 160 Drymobius skiltonianus Holbrookia horridus 17 margaritiferus interparietalis 71, 78 approximans 181, 183, 184 intermedius intermedius 73, 82 fistulosus 73, 82 skiltonianus 71, 78 elegans lepidus 252, 253, 256, 259 margaritiferus 73, 82 tetragrammus tetragrammus 71, 78 elegans 71, 78 klauberi 19, 22 Echis Eunectes thermophila 71, 78 lepidus 19, 22 carinatus 57 murinus 35, 61, 164 maculata 254 molossus 151, 252, 253, 262 coloratus 57 notaeus 164 approximans 71, 78 molossus 22 pyramidum 57 Eurycea 236 bunkeri 71, 78, 183, 184 nigrescens 22, 73, 82, 142 Egernia stokesii 174 neotenes 236 propinqua propinqua 71, 78 pricei 252, 255, 259 Elaphe 210-211 Exiliboa placata 263 Homopus signatus signatus 149 pricei 19, 23, 73, 82 emoryi 1 Ficimia Hyla scutalatus scutulatus 73, 82 flavirufa flavirufa 74, 82 olivacea 74, 82 albolineata 9 scutulatus 255, 258 guttata 130, 173 streckeri 74, 82 andersonii 130 scutulatus 19, 23 meahllmorum 74, 82 Gallotia gomerona 144 arenicolor 68, 142, 162, 163 tigris 249, 257 obsoleta 130, 242, 271 Gambelia wislizenii wislizenii 183 bistincta, 142, 174 triseriatus spiloides 222 Gastrophryne calthula 174 aquilus 73, 82 vulpina 222 elegans 68 chrysoscelis 243, 271 triseriatus 73, 82, 142 Eleutherodactylus olivacea 68 dendroscarta 68 unicolor 17 alfredi 68 olivacea 68, 162, 163 euphorbiacea 68 viridus 151, 251 augusti usta 68 eximia 68, 142 nuntius 43, 44, 48 augusti 68 Gastropyxis smaragdina 272 wrightorum 163 viridus 11, 255, 258 cactorum 68 Gastrotheca 9 godmani 68 willardi 103, 252, 253, 254 cystignathoides 68 albolineata 9 melanomma melanomma 68 Crotaphytus decoratus decoratus 68 microdiscus 9 microcephala underwoodi 68 collaris 45, 58, 257, 261 dennisi 68 Gehyra mutilata 71, 78 miotympanum 68 baileyi 70, 78 guttilatus 68 Gekko gecko 173, 273 pentheter 174 fuscus 182 leprus 68 Geochelone picta 68 melanomaculatus 70, 78 longipes 68 pardalis 57 plicata 68, 142 293 robertsorum 68 Lepidophyma haraldmeiri 10 rhombifer 1, 270 smithi 68 gaigeae 71, 79 laevigata 10 blanchardi 75, 83 squirella 222 micropholis 71, 79 madagascariensis 10 rhombifer 75, 84 versicolor 130, 171 smithi smithi 71, 79 manery 10 werleri 75, 84 Hypopachus variolosus 68 Leptodactyus “marojezi” 10 sipedon 9, 11, 271 Hypsiglena labialis 68 “marojeyzi” 10 Ninia torquata 48, 252 melanonotus 68 mylotympanum 10 diademata dunklei 74, 82 Leptodeira “mysteriosa” 10 diademata 75, 84 jani 19, 20, 74, 82 annulata cussiliris 74, 83 nasuta 10 labiosa 75, 84 ochrorhyncha 74, 82 maculata 74, 83 “negristata” plorator 75, 84 torquata 74, 82 punctata 74, 83 nigricans 10 sebae sebae 75, 84 Iguana iguana 71, 78 septentrionalis pulchra 10 Norops Imantodes polysticta 74, 83 viridis 10 crassulus 71, 79 cenchoa leucomelas 74, 82 septentrionalis 74, 83 Masticophis lemurinus bourgeaei 71, 79 gemmistratus splendida splendida 74, 83 bilineatus 251 nebulosus 71, 79 latistratus 74, 83 Leptophis bilineatus 74, 83 petersi 71, 79 reticulatus 74, 83 diplotropis diplotropis 74, 83 flagellum 252 rodriguezi rodriguezi 71, 79 tenuissimus 74, 83 mexicanus lineatulus 21 sericeus 71, 79 Jobaria 6, 30 mexicanus 74, 83 lineatulus × testaceus 19, 21 tropidonotus tropidonotus 71, 79 Kentropyx viridistriga 36 yucatanensis 74, 83 piceus 74, 83 Notophthalmus Kinosternon Leptotyphlops 137 testaceus 21, 74, 83 meridionalis acutum 69, 77 bressoni 74, 83 mentovarius kallerti 67 flavescens 229, 243, 260 dulcis 56 mentovarius 74, 83 meridionalis 67 flavescens 69, 77, 230, 231 dulcis 74, 83 striolatus 74, 83 viridescens 150 herrerai 69, 77 iversoni 74, 83 schotti Opheodrys aestivus 160, 222 hirtipes myopicus 74, 83 ruthveni 74, 83 Ophisaurus hirtipes 142 humilis dugesi 74, 83 schotti 75, 83 mimicus 114 megacephalum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comment (2) of Ross Melinchuk on Behalf of Texas Parks and Wildlife
    HULY'VjVLCIVES ~7r~ ~~/2 November 5, 2010 ~NOV~F I Ac 'N- 8:5 3 UEAPAKU Life's better outside.: Ms. Cindy K. Bladey Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch R .HF\Ac:D Commissioners Office of Administration Mail Stop: TWB-05-BOIM Peter M.Holt Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Antonio Washington, DC 20555-0001 T. Dan Friedkin Vice-Chairman Houston RE: Proposed Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plants Units 3 and 4 Combined Mark E. Bivins Amarillo License Application Review, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Ralph H. Duggins (DEIS), Somervell and Hood Counties Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. Rio Grande City Dear Ms. Bladey: Karen J. Hixon San Antonio Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) received the August 6, 2010 Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. notification for issuance of and request for comment on the above-referenced Beeville DEIS. The notification was submitted in accordance with the National Margaret Martin Boerne Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Fish and S. Reed Morian Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934, as amended. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Houston (NRC) prepared the DEIS as part of its review of Luminant Generation Company Lee M. Bass Chairman-Emeritus LLC (Luminant) application for combined licenses for construction and operation Fort Worth of two new nuclear units at its existing Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) site near Glen Rose, Texas. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth Carter R Smith District (USACE) is a cooperating agency in the DEIS so that the EIS can be used Executive Director to decide on issuance of permits pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 512 490-0057 FAX 490-0974 December 3, 2004 Wayne A. Lea Chief, Regulatory Branch Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300 Consultation No. 2-15-F-2004-0242 Dear Mr. Lea: This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the proposed water operations by the Colorado River Municipal Water District (District) on the Colorado and Concho rivers, located in Coleman, Concho, Coke, Tom Green, and Runnels counties. These actions are authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) under Permit Number 197900225, Ivie (Stacy) Reservoir project, pursuant to compliance with the Clean Water Act. The District and the Corps have indicated, through letters dated September 10, 2004, and September 13, 2004, respectively, that an emergency condition affecting human health and safety exists with this action. We have considered the effects of the proposed action on the federally listed threatened Concho water snake (Nerodia harteri paucimaculata) in accordance with formal interagency consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The emergency consultation provisions are contained within 50 CFR section 402.05 of the Interagency Regulations. Your July 8, 2004, request for reinitiating formal consultation was received on July 12, 2004. You designated District as your non-federal representative. This biological opinion is based on information provided in agency reports, telephone conversations, field investigations, and other sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment US 377 Relief Route
    Final Environmental Assessment US 377 Relief Route CSJs: 0080-11-001 and 0080-12-001 City of Cresson, Hood and Johnson Counties, Texas Fort Worth District Date: August 2017 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Need and Purpose for the Proposed Project .............................................................................. 2 1. Need .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 4 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING FACILITY ........................................................................................ 5 A. Existing Facility Design / Conditions ........................................................................................... 5 B. Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 5 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecosystems 3 Chapter 1
    TERRESTRIAL Chapter 1: Terrestrial Ecosystems 3 Chapter 1: What are the history, Terrestrial status, and projected future of terrestrial wildlife habitat types and Ecosystems species in the South? Margaret Katherine Trani (Griep) Southern Region, USDA Forest Service ■ Since presettlement, there have insect infestation, advanced age, Key Findings been significant losses of community climatic processes, and distur- biodiversity in the South (Noss and bance influence mast yields. ■ There are 132 terrestrial vertebrate others 1995). Fourteen communities ■ The ranges of many species species that are considered to be are critically endangered (greater cross both public and private of conservation concern in the South than 98-percent decline), 25 are land ownerships. The numbers of by State Natural Heritage agencies. endangered (85- to 98-percent imperiled and endangered species Of the species that warrant conser- decline), and 11 are threatened inhabiting private land indicate its vation focus, 3 percent are classed (70- to 84-percent decline). Common critical importance for conservation. factors contributing to the loss of as critically imperiled, 3 percent ■ The significance of land owner- as imperiled, and 6 percent as these communities include urban development, fire suppression, ship in the South for the provision vulnerable. Eighty-six percent of species habitat cannot be of terrestrial vertebrate species exotic species invasion, and recreational activity. overstated. Each major landowner are designated as relatively secure. has an important role to play in ■ The remaining 2 percent are either The term “fragmentation” the conservation of species and known or presumed to be extinct, references the insularization of their habitats. or have questionable status. habitat on a landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Section III - Acknowledgements
    Section III - Acknowledgements Mike Berger TPWD Wildlife Division Director Larry McKinney TPWD Coastal Fisheries Director Phil Durocher TPWD Inland Fisheries Director Lydia Saldana TPWD Communications Division Director TPWD Program Director, Science Research and Diversity Program - Ron George Wildlife Division (Retired) Technical Assistance Andy Price Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Bob Gottfried Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Cliff Shackelford Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Duane Schlitter Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Gary Garrett Texas Parks and Wildlife - Inland Fisheries Division John Young Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Mike Quinn Texas Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Division Paul Hammerschmidt Texas Parks and Wildlife - Coastal Fisheries Division (Retired) Wildlife Diversity Policy Advisory Committee Terry Austin (chair) Audubon Texas (retired) Damon Waitt Brown Center for Environmental Education - Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center David Wolfe Environmental Defense Don Petty Texas Farm Bureau Doug Slack Texas A & M University, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences Evelyn Merz Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club Jack King Sportsmen’s Conservationists of Texas Jennifer Walker Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club Jim Bergan The Nature Conservancy of Texas Jim Foster Trans-Texas, Davis Mountain and Hill Country Heritage Association Kirby Brown Texas Wildlife Association Matt Brockman Texas and Southwestern Cattleraisers Association Mike McMurry Texas Department of Agriculture Phil Sudman Texas Society of Mammalogists Richard Egg Texas Soil and Water Conservation Board Susan Kaderka National Wildlife Federation, Gulf States Field Office Ted Eubanks Fermata, Inc. Troy Hibbitts Texas Herpetological Society Wallace Rogers TPWD Private Lands Advisory Board Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Working Groups Aquatic Working Group Gary Garrett (chair) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Paul Hammerschmidt (chair) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 578 Carrie Thompson U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Documentation
    Tier I Site Assessment Main CSJ: 0113-13-168 Form Prepared By: Chelsea Miller (CP&Y, Inc.) Date of Evaluation: February 24, 2020 Proposed Letting Date: November 2022 Project not assigned to TxDOT under the NEPA Assignment MOU District(s): Austin County(ies): Travis Roadway Name: State Loop 360 Limits From: Lake Austin Limits To: North of RM 2222 Project Description: TxDOT Austin District proposes to improve a portion of State Loop 360 from Lake Austin to north of RM 2222 in Austin, Travis County, Texas. The proposed project includes improvements to the intersection at SL 360 at Courtyard Drive by removing the signal on the mainlanes and replacing it with an underpass. The project would also construct a diverging diamond intersection at RM 2222. Bicycle/pedestrian accommodations will also be provided. The project is 0.86 miles in length and the project area is 67.2 acres in size. No easements are proposed for the project. No new ROW is required for the project. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. 1. No Is the project limited to a maintenance activity exempt from coordination? http://txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/environmental/maintenance-program.html 2. No Has the project previously completed coordination with TPWD? 3. Yes Is the project within range of a state threatened or endangered species or SGCN and suitable habitat is present? *Explain: Suitable habitat for the Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia - E), bracted twistflower (Streptanthus bracteatus - T), and Timber Rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus - T) was observed within the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum Lengths of North American Snakes Jeff Boundy Museum of Natural Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803
    Bull. Chicago Herp. Soc. 30(6):109-122, 1995 Maximum Lengths of North American Snakes Jeff Boundy Museum of Natural Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 The following list provides maximum lengths for species Herpetological Review. Such reports should be substantiated and subspecies of North American snakes, that is, those taxa with a voucher specimen or a photograph of the specimen with for which specimens are known from the continental United a scale of reference (i.e., a hand, yardstick, etc.). States or Canada. Total lengths are given in millimeters, and State or province abbreviations for Canada and Mexico: metric conversions are based on 1O = 25.4 mm. In each case BCA (Baja California), BCO (British Columbia), BCS (Baja an effort was made to trace records to their original source or California Sur), CHI (Chihuahua), NSC (Nova Scotia), ONT earliest citation. Maximum lengths provided by Wright and (Ontario), SAS (Saskatchewan), SLP (San Luis Potosi), and Wright (1957) often appear to be estimations, and such lengths, SON (Sonora). Museum acronyms: CAS (California Acad- unless reported elsewhere, have been ignored. Maximum emy of Science, San Francisco), FSM (Florida State Museum, sizes for certain taxa are unknown or have gone unreported, Gainesville), KU (University of Kansas, Lawrence), LSUMZ and in some such instances I have included the largest speci- (Louisiana State University Museum of Natural Science, Baton men known to me. In cases for which the particular subspe- Rouge), MVZ (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley), cies for a record is unknown the length follows the species UCSB (University of California, Santa Barbara).
    [Show full text]
  • Disease of Aquatic Organisms 95:233
    Vol. 95: 233–240, 2011 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published July 12 doi: 10.3354/dao02365 Dis Aquat Org Renifer aniarum (Digenea: Reniferidae), an introduced North American parasite in grass snakes Natrix natrix in Calabria, southern Italy Mario Santoro1,*, Vasyl V. Tkach2, Simonetta Mattiucci1, John M. Kinsella3, Giuseppe Nascetti4 1Section of Parasitology, Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 00185 Rome, Italy 2Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, 10 Cornell Street, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202, USA 3Helm West Laboratory, 2108 Hilda Avenue, Missoula, Montana 59801, USA 4Department of Ecology and Biology, Tuscia University, Viale dell’Università s/n, 01100 Viterbo, Italy ABSTRACT: Over the past decades, as a result of various human activities involving intentional or unintentional movement of animals, many helminth species have been introduced to new regions with several ecological and epidemiological implications for the native species. A high prevalence of infection with an introduced digenean Renifer aniarum, previously known only from North America, was found in the grass snake Natrix natrix in the Calabria region, southern Italy. Morphological and molecular comparison with North American R. aniarum has confirmed the identity of the Italian spec- imens. A total of 41 grass snakes were studied for R. aniarum infection. Of 24 snakes sampled be - tween 2009 and 2010, 22 were positive for this parasite. In contrast, all 17 snakes sampled from museum collections between 1983 and 1994 were negative. Our results support the hypothesis that R. aniarum was perhaps introduced into this area during the 1990s by the translocation of the Amer- ican bullfrog Lithobates (Rana) catesbeianus, a normal second intermediate host of the digenean in its native range in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Brush Control
    2021 Brazos G Regional Water Plan | Volume II Brush Control 12 Brush Control Brush control is a potential water management strategy that could create additional water supply in the Brazos G Area. The Texas Brush Control Program, created in 1985 and operated by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (TSSWCB), served to study and implement brush control programs until September 2011. HB1808 established a new program in 2012, the Water Supply Enhancement Program (WSEP), with the purpose and intent of increasing available surface and ground water supplies through the selective control of brush species detrimental to water conservation. The WSEP program is described in the January 2017 State Water Supply Enhancement Plan1. The TSSWCB collaborates with soil water conservation districts and other local, regional, state, and federal agencies to identify watersheds across the state where it is feasible to implement brush control to enhance water supplies. The TSSWCB uses a competitive grant process to rank feasible projects and allocate WSEP grant funds, giving priority to projects that balance the most critical water needs with the highest projected water yield from brush control. For a watershed to be considered eligible for allocation of WSEP cost-share funds, a feasibility study must demonstrate runoff increases in project post-treatment conditions. At this time, two feasibility studies have been completed in the Brazos G Region, resulting in on-going projects: • Lake Fort Phantom Hill watershed – in FY 2018 the TSSWCB provided $250,000 in matching funds Subbasin 15. • Lake Palo Pinto watershed – in FY 2018 the TSSWCB provided $200,000 in matching funds for Subbasin 22108082.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 1991 / Proposed Rules
    58804 Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 1991 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR of a more general nature may be Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish submitted to: Chief, Division of and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species, U.S. Fish and Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907/ Wildlife Service, Mail Stop 452 ARLSQ, 786-3505 or FTS 907/786-3505). 50 CFR Part 17 Washington, DC 20240. Written FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: comments and materials received in Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in response to this notice will be available and Plants; Animal Candidate Review the responsible Regional Office(s), or Dr. for public inspection by appointment in for Listing as Endangered or Janet E. Hohn, Deputy Chief, Division of the Regional Offices listed below. Threatened Species Endangered Species, U.S. Fish and Information relating to particular taxa in Wildlife Service, Mail Stop 452 ARLSQ, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, this notice may be obtained from the Washington, DC 20240, (703/358-2171 or Interior. Service's Endangered Species FTS 921-2171). ACTION: Notice of review. Coordinator in the lead Regional Office identified for each taxon and listed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: In this notice the U.S. Fish below: Background and Wildlife Service (Service) presents Region 1.—California, Hawaii, Idaho, an updated compilation of vertebrate Nevada, Oregon, Washington, The Endangered Species Act (16 and invertebrate animal taxa native to Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires the the United States that are being Islands, and Pacific Territories of the Secretary of the Interior (or Commerce reviewed for possible addition to the United States.
    [Show full text]