For Black Airmen, Disparities Persist in USAF Life, Culture, and Promotions | 28

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Black Airmen, Disparities Persist in USAF Life, Culture, and Promotions | 28 Faster Pilot The Goldfein Years 37 | Long-range Strike 46 | Spaceplanes, Then and Now 55 Training 16 BLACK AND AIR FORCE BLUE For Black Airmen, disparities persist In USAF life, culture, and promotions | 28 July/August 2020 $8 Published by the Air Force Association STAFF Publisher July/August 2020. Vol. 103, No. 7 & 8 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant Managing Editor Chequita Wood Senior Designer Dashton Parham Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine Tech. Sgt. Jake Barreiro Sgt. Jake Tech. Digital Platforms DEPARTMENTS FEATURES Senior Airman Editor 2 Editorial: Power 8 Q&A: The Future of the Expeditionary Force Cody Mehren Jennifer-Leigh Plays and signals to a B-2 Oprihory Competition Lt. Gen. Mark D. Kelly, incoming head of Air Combat Spirit bomber during a refuel- Senior Editor By Tobias Naegele Command, speaks with John A. Tirpak about the Rachel S. Cohen changes coming to USAF. ing stop at An- 3 Letters dersen Air Force Production Base, Guam. Manager 4 Index to 28 Leveling the Field Eric Chang Lee Advertisers By Rachel S. Cohen Photo Editor 7 Verbatim The Air Force has room for improvement in Mike Tsukamoto 10 Strategy & Policy: addressing racial bias in the promotion process. The Big Fighter 33 Black Airmen Speak Out Contributors Gamble John T. Correll, By Rachel S. Cohen Robert S. Dudney, 12 Airframes Mark Gunzinger, In a force where color shouldn’t matter, inequalities 16 World: Rebuilding Jennifer Hlad, persist. Alyk Russell Kenlan, the forge; Meet the LaDonna Orleans new CMSAF; Space 37 The Goldfein Years Force organization; Russian Intercepts; By John A. Tirpak and more ... Chief 21’s legacy is his vision for the future: A highly 27 Faces of the Force connected joint force. 60 Airman for Life 41 Coping with COVID Across the Force ADVERTISING: Nominees for AFA National Officers; By Brian W. Everstine Kirk Brown Director, Media Mitchell Institute USAF is keeping the tip of the spear honed, despite ON THE COVER Fellows; AFA social pandemic challenges. Solutions media takeover. 703.247.5829 46 Stand In, Standoff [email protected] 64 Namesakes: Shaw By Mark Gunzinger SUBSCRIBE The right balance for the future bomber fleet. & SAVE Subscribe to 52 Let the Games Begin Air Force Magazine By Amy McCullough and save big off The Air Force sees cooperative esports as both Sgt.Staff Campbell/NYANG Ryan the cover price, recruiting tools and boosts to resiliency. Lt. Col. Paul Lopez, plus get a free then-commander membership 55 The Spaceplane: 60 Years On of USAF’s F-22 to the Air Force Demonstration Association. By John T. Correll Team, salutes a 1-800-727-3337 The ultimate goal was to take off from Earth, fly a crew member. See “Black Airmen mission through space, re-enter the atmosphere, and Speak Out,” p. 33. land on a runway. Air Force Magazine (ISSN 0730-6784) July/August 2020 (Vol. 103, No. 7 & 8) is published monthly, except for two double issues in January/February and July/August, by the Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Phone (703) 247-5800. Periodical postage paid at Arlington, Va., and additional mailing offices. Membership Rate: $50 per year; $35 e-Membership; $125 for three-year membership. Subscription Rate: $50 per year; $29 per year additional for postage to foreign addresses (except Canada and Mexico, which are $10 per year additional). Regular issues $8 each. USAF Almanac issue $18 each. Change of address requires four weeks’ notice. Please include mailing label. POSTMASTER: Send changes of address to Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Publisher assumes no responsibility for unsolicited material. Trademark registered by Air Force Association. Copyright 2020 by Air Force Association. JULY/AUGUST 2020 AIRFORCEMAG.COM 1 EDITORIAL By Tobias Naegele Power Plays and Competition ussia and the United States are flying missions on the edges ludicrous to think that serious people would do serious damage to of each other’s territory at the fastest pace in a generation. our national defense. RRussian Tu-95 Bear bombers have repeatedly approached U.S. With only a couple of exceptions, defense spending has risen airspace near Alaska, causing F-22s to scramble, and U.S. bombers and annually for roughly two decades. Expensive ground-centric wars intelligence aircraft have similarly shown their prowess over northern in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria have taken their toll. It is natural for Europe and the Pacific. Russian instigation also rattles its neighbors. taxpayers and legislators to want to ratchet down that spending now On the other side of the planet, China continues to press territorial to fund other priorities; it is beyond their intuition to understand that claims in skirmishes and standoffs all along its southern flank. China our military is now depleted and ill-suited to take on peer competitors faced off with India and Bhutan, on land, over border claims in June, in potential future conflicts. and in the South China Sea, continues to build up man-made islands The fact that our Air Force is now the smallest and oldest it in a bid to extend its perimeter beyond international norms. To China, has ever been is common knowledge only to those in the know. the entire sea is sovereign territory. Joe Public is oblivious, and even less aware of what the U.S. will China’s increasingly brutal treatment of ethnic Uyghurs, includ- face should it ever need to engage in combat with the People’s ing forced sterilization and imprisonment in concentration camps, Republic of China. was classified as genocide in a recent report from the Jamestown Taking on China will require superior air, space, and cyber forces. Foundation. Its tightening stranglehold on Hong Kong, meanwhile, Conventional land and naval forces need not apply. While the cry demonstrates the “One Country, Two Systems” “where are the carriers” might have defined policy—in place since 1997—is shrinking away. potential combat with China a generation ago, In Taiwan, they can only be wondering: Can Taking on China will require that is no longer the case. Aircraft carriers, the the U.S. be relied on in the face of Chinese ex- superior air, space, and pride of the Navy fleet, remain among the most pansion and aggression? Likewise, a free and cyber forces. Conventional visible symbols of American military power. But unfettered Europe depends largely on America’s in combat with China they will instead be our commitment to its NATO allies in the face of land and naval forces most visible targets—and greatest symbols of Russian instigation. need not apply. U.S. vulnerability. Too big to hide and too slow Regardless of your domestic politics, protect- to escape, they will be held at bay—or sunk at ing our allies and deterring our rivals remains central to American will—by hypersonic guided missiles, destroyed before they get close interests both at home and abroad. U.S. strategy depends on the enough to become effective. ability to deter competitors, with credible force, from trying to have Instead, it will be the United States’ low observable assets that their way with neighbors. China may not fear Taiwan, but it does fear reign supreme in conflicts with other great powers. Stealth fighters a conflict with the United States—at least for now. and bombers that can strike deep in enemy territory without being Republicans and Democrats agree on funding defense—at least detected; spacecraft that can track and queue potential targets and the experts do. The House Armed Services Committee approved its threats from the vantage of the gods; and cyber operators that can version of the 2021 defense policy bill by a 56-0 vote, and the Senate paralyze adversaries’ intelligence and communications networks Armed Services Committee approved its version also by a very a with strategic effect are all critical to deter future wars—and to win wide margin. But it is among the non-experts that cracks appear in them should it come to that. this apparent unity of vision. No wonder, then, that the Navy and Army are trying to develop The trillions of dollars invested to cushion the blows of COVID-19 long-range strike weapons to seek relevancy in such a fight. Unable have ballooned the budget deficit this year to more than $2 trillion to get within 1,000 miles of their targets, they want new capabilities and our overall national debt to more than $20 trillion. Near-zero to enable them to engage. They forget why we have a joint force: It’s interest rates today make that debt burden relatively manageable, not to divvy up missions to ensure that everyone gets a piece of the but our deflated economy will produce less tax revenue to pay those action, but rather to match the right solution to the problem. No one bills. Interest rates, and inflation won’t remain at historic lows forever. would call on a B-2 bomber to eliminate a terrorist streaking across Hence, the knives are out and those who’d carve up and redirect the desert in a pickup truck, because an MQ-9 Reaper will do the the defense budget for other purposes are honing the blades. Rep. job well for a fraction of the cost. Likewise, it makes little sense for Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) offered a resolution in June to cut $350 billion the Army to acquire a capability for which the Air Force is inherently from defense spending “to reduce the priority given to war in our better suited.
Recommended publications
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Key to Index
    PAGE KEY TO INDEX AIRCRAFT — B-17 "Flying Fortresses" 1 AIRCRAFT — Other 2 AWARDS — Military 2 AWARDS —Other 3 CITIES 3 ESCAPES and EVASIONS 10 GENERAL 10 INTERNEES 19 KILLED IN ACTION 19 MEMORIALS and CEMETERIES 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — 303rd BG 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — Other 21 MISSIONS — Target and Date 25 PERSONS 26 PRISONERS OF WAR 51 REUNIONS 51 WRITERS 52 1 El Screamo (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Miss Lace (Feb. 2004, pg. 18), (May 2004, Fast Worker II (May 2005, pg. 12) pg. 15) + (May 2005, pg. 12), (Nov. 2005, I N D E X FDR (May 2004, pg. 17) pg. 8) + (Nov. 2006, pg. 13) + (May 2007, FDR's Potato Peeler Kids (Feb. 2002, pg. pg. 16-photo) 15) + (May 2004, pg. 17) Miss Liberty (Aug. 2006, pg. 17) Flak Wolf (Aug. 2005, pg. 5), (Nov. 2005, Miss Umbriago (Aug 2003, pg. 15) AIRCRAFT pg. 18) Mugger, The (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flak Wolf II (May 2004, pg. 7) My Darling (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) B-17 "Flying Fortress" Floose (May 2004, pg. 4, 6-photo) Myasis Dragon (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bison (Nov. 2006, pg. 19-photo) Nero (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bitch (Aug. 2002, pg. 17) + (Feb. Neva, The Silver Lady (May 2005, pg. 15), “451" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) 2004, pg. 18) (Aug. 2005, pg. 19) “546" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) Fox for the F (Nov. 2004, pg. 7) Nine-O-Nine (May 2005, pg. 20) + (May 41-24577 (May 2002, pg. 12) Full House (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) 2007, pg. 20-photo) 41-24603 (Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No
    MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Kunsan Air Base
    Welcome to Kunsan Air Base "Home of the Wolf Pack" Dear Guest, Welcome to Wolf Pack Lodge, the newest AF Lodging facility in the ROK. Kunsan Air Base is home to the 8th Fighter Wing, also known as the "Wolf Pack," a nickname given during the command of Colonel Robin Olds in 1966. Our mission is; "Defend the Base, Accept Follow on Forces, and Take the Fight North," the warriors here do an amazing job ensuring mission success. Kunsan AB plays host to many personnel, in all branches of the service, in support of our numerous peninsula wide exercises each year. We are proud to serve all the war fighters who participate in these exercises and ensure our "Fight Tonight" capability. To ensure you have a great stay with us, I would ask that you report any problem with your room to our front desk staff immediately, so we can try to resolve the issue, and you can focus on your mission here. If any aspect of your stay is less than you would hope for, please call me at 782-1844 ext. 160, or just dial 160 from your room phone. You may also e-mail me at [email protected] , I will answer you as quickly as possible. We are required to enter each room at least every 72 hours, this is not meant to inconvenience you, but to make sure you are okay, and see if there is anything you need. If you will be working shift work while here and would like to set up a time that is best for you to receive housekeeping service, please dial 157 from your room phone, and the Housekeeping Manager would be happy to schedule your cleaning between 0800 and 1600.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI fihns the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter 6ce, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 A PEOPLE^S AIR FORCE: AIR POWER AND AMERICAN POPULAR CULTURE, 1945 -1965 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Charles Call, M.A, M S.
    [Show full text]
  • Touching the Face of God: Religion, Technology, and the United States Air Force
    Touching the Face of God: Religion, Technology, and the United States Air Force Timothy J. Cathcart Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Science and Technology Studies Dr. Shannon A. Brown, Chair Dr. Lee L. Zwanziger Dr. Janet E. Abbate Dr. Barbara J. Reeves 3 December 2008 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: united states air force, religion, military technology, military culture, social construction of technology Copyright © 2008, Timothy J. Cathcart Touching the Face of God: Religion, Technology, and the United States Air Force Timothy J. Cathcart ABSTRACT The goal of my project is a detailed analysis of the technological culture of the United States Air Force from a Science and Technology Studies (STS) perspective. In particular, using the metaphor of the Air Force as religion helps in understanding a culture built on matters of life-and-death. This religious narrative—with the organizational roles of actors such as priests, prophets, and laity, and the institutional connotations of theological terms such as sacredness—is a unique approach to the Air Force. An analysis of how the Air Force interacts with technology—the very thing that gives it meaning—from the social construction of technology approach will provide a broader understanding of this relationship. Mitcham’s dichotomy of the engineering philosophy of technology (EPT) and the humanities philosophy of technology (HPT) perspectives provides a methodology for analyzing Air Force decisions and priorities. I examine the overarching discourse and metaphor—consisting of techniques, technologies, experiences, language, and religion—in a range of historical case studies describing the sociological and philosophical issues of the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Download (PDF)
    Q&A: JCS Vice Roles and Missions Reboot? 48| Pilot Training 44| Cost-Per-E ect Calculus 60 Chairman Gen. John Hyten 14 THE NEW ARCTIC STRATEGY Competition Intensifies in a Critical Region |52 September 2020 $8 Published by the Air Force Association THOSE BORN TO FLY LIVE TO WALK AWAY ACES 5®: Proven and ready Protecting aircrew is our mission. It’s why our ACES 5® ejection seat is the world’s only production seat proven to meet the exacting standards of MIL-HDBK-516C. Innovative technologies and consistent test results make ACES 5 the most advanced protection for your aircrew. Plus, we leverage 40 years of investment to keep your life-cycle costs at their lowest. ACES 5: Fielded and available today. The only ejection seat made in the United States. collinsaerospace.com/aces5 © 2020 Collins Aerospace CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd 1 8/3/20 8:43 AM Client: Collins Aerospace - Missions Systems Ad Title: Aces 5 - Eject - Proven and Ready Filepath: /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Collins Aerospace 2020/_Collins Aerospace Ads/_Mission Systems/ACES 5_Ads/4c Ads/ Eject_Proven and ready/CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd Publication: Air Force Magazine - September Trim: 8.125” x 10.875” • Bleed: 8.375” x 11.125” • Live: 7.375” x 10.125” STAFF Publisher September 2020. Vol. 103, No. 9 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant Managing Editor Chequita Wood Senior Designer Dashton Parham Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine Master Sgt. Christopher Boitz Sgt. Christopher Master Digital Platforms Editor DEPARTMENTS FEATURES T-38C Talons Jennifer-Leigh begin to break 2 Editorial: Seize 14 Q&A: The Joint Focus Oprihory the High Ground away from an echelon for- Senior Editor By Tobias Naegele Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing the Heat Barrier: a History of Hypersonics First Thoughts of Hypersonic Propulsion
    Facing the Heat Barrier: A History of Hypersonics First Thoughts of Hypersonic Propulsion Republic’s Aerospaceplane concept showed extensive engine-airframe integration. (Republic Aviation) For takeoff, Lockheed expected to use Turbo-LACE. This was a LACE variant that sought again to reduce the inherently hydrogen-rich operation of the basic system. Rather than cool the air until it was liquid, Turbo-Lace chilled it deeply but allowed it to remain gaseous. Being very dense, it could pass through a turbocom- pressor and reach pressures in the hundreds of psi. This saved hydrogen because less was needed to accomplish this cooling. The Turbo-LACE engines were to operate at chamber pressures of 200 to 250 psi, well below the internal pressure of standard rockets but high enough to produce 300,000 pounds of thrust by using turbocom- pressed oxygen.67 Republic Aviation continued to emphasize the scramjet. A new configuration broke with the practice of mounting these engines within pods, as if they were turbojets. Instead, this design introduced the important topic of engine-airframe integration by setting forth a concept that amounted to a single enormous scramjet fitted with wings and a tail. A conical forward fuselage served as an inlet spike. The inlets themselves formed a ring encircling much of the vehicle. Fuel tankage filled most of its capacious internal volume. This design study took two views regarding the potential performance of its engines. One concept avoided the use of LACE or ACES, assuming again that this craft could scram all the way to orbit. Still, it needed engines for takeoff so turbo- ramjets were installed, with both Pratt & Whitney and General Electric providing Lockheed’s Aerospaceplane concept.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the AIR FORCE 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330–1670 Phone (703) 697–7376, Fax 695–8809
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330–1670 phone (703) 697–7376, fax 695–8809 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE Secretary of the Air Force.—Hon. Barbara Barrett, Room 4E878. Confidential Assistant.—Peggy Buchanan. Senior Military Assistant.—Brig. Gen. David Miller. Deputy Military Assistant.—Lt. Col. Sean Piccirilli. Military Aid.—Lt. Col. Angela Tapia. Executive Assistants: SMSgt Ronald Lerch, TSgt Kristen Winters. SECAF /CSAF EXECUTIVE ACTION GROUP Director.—Col. Deborah Lovette (703) 697–5540. Deputy Chief.—Catherine Perro. UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4E858, Washington, DC 20330–1670 phone (703) 697–1361 Under Secretary of the Air Force.—Hon. John Roth (acting), PTDO. Confidential Assistant.—Rosa Ramirez. Senior Military Assistant.—Col. Andrew Clark. Military Assistant.—Lt. Col. Tyler Hess. Executive Assistant.—MSgt Ivanka Vrechkov. CHIEF OF STAFF 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4E924, Washington, DC 20330–1670 phone (703) 693–7837 Chief of Staff.—Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr. Confidential Assistant.—Terri Stern. Special Assistant.—Samuel Neill, Room 4E929, 697–1930. Executive Officer.—Col. Curtis Bass. Vice Chief of Staff.—Gen. Stephen Wilson, Room 4E944, 695–7911. Director of Staff.—Lt. Gen. Timothy Fay, Room 4E877, 695–7913. Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force.—CMSAF Joanne Bass, Room 4E941, 695–0498. CHIEF OF SPACE OPERATIONS 1670 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4E858, Washington, DC 20330–1670 phone (703) 695–9387 Chief of Space Operations.—Gen. John Raymond. Confidential Assistant.—Audrey Pfingston. Executive Officer.—Lt. Col. Tammy Schlichenmaier. Director of Staff.—Lt. Gen. Nina Armagno, 693–9513. United States Space Force Senior Enlisted Advisor.—CMSgt Roger Towberman, 693–6276.
    [Show full text]