For 30 Minutes, James H. Howard Single-Handedly Fought Off Marauding German Fighters to Defend the B-17S of 401St Bomb Group. for That, He Received the Medal of Honor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For 30 Minutes, James H. Howard Single-Handedly Fought Off Marauding German Fighters to Defend the B-17S of 401St Bomb Group. for That, He Received the Medal of Honor For 30 minutes, James H. Howard single-handedly fought off marauding German fighters to defend the B-17s of 401st Bomb Group. For that, he received the Medal of Honor. One-Man Air Force By Rebecca Grant Mustang pilot who took on the German Air Force single-handedly, and saved on Nazi aircraft and fuel production. our 401st Bomb Group from disaster?” uesday, Jan. 11, 1944, was Devastating missions to targets such wondered Col. Harold Bowman, the a rough day for the B-17Gs as Ploesti in Romania had already unit’s commander. of the 401st Bomb Group. produced Medal of Honor recipients. Soon the bomber pilots knew—and TIt was their 14th mission, but the Many were awarded posthumously, and so did those back home. first one on which they took heavy nearly all went to bomber crewmen. “Maj. James H. Howard was identi- losses—four aircraft missing in ac- Waist gunners, pilots, and naviga- fied today as the lone United States tion after bombing Me 110 fighter tors—all were carrying out heroic acts fighter pilot who for more than 30 production plants at Oschersleben and in the face of the enemy. minutes fought off about 30 Ger- Halberstadt, Germany. The lone P-51 pilot on this bomb- man fighters trying to attack Eighth Turning for home, they witnessed ing run would, in fact, become the Air Force B-17 formations returning an amazing sight: A single P-51 stayed only fighter pilot awarded the Medal from Oschersleben and Halberstadt with them for an incredible 30 minutes of Honor in World War II’s European in Germany,” reported the New York on egress, chasing off German fighters Theater. “With utter disregard for his Times on Jan. 19, 1944. attempting to hack away at the bomb- own safety, he immediately pressed Howard was a tall, quiet squadron ers. A “one-man Air Force,” said Maj. home determined attacks,” the citation commander from the 354th Fighter Allison C. Brooks, group leader for read in part. Group. He had a reputation for doing the 401st’s mission. In the teamwork environment of things his way. One reporter termed Extraordinary valor was needed aerial combat, this was a rare example him “as American as the Jeep,” but the in the skies over Germany, as Eighth of one man braving enemy fire repeat- reality was more complicated. Howard Air Force began its long-range attacks edly to save others. “Who was that was born in China, where his father, 60 AIR FORCE Magazine / November 2010 a prominent eye surgeon, had spent Offers of flying jobs from both the There was only so much the fighter several years on a university exchange. Navy and Army awaited him there. pilots could do. Lacking range, the He left China at age 14 and finished Eventually Howard traveled out to P-47s and P-38s could only provide high school in St. Louis before earn- see old Navy friends at North Island, limited assistance to the bombers. The ing a degree at Pomona College in in San Diego, Calif. Cold-shouldered Luftwaffe was still at full strength. Not California. Lured away from medical by an officious Navy base commander, until March 1944 did the shortages in studies by a Navy recruiter, he’d started Howard revolted and accepted the aviation gas and trained pilots begin to his aviation career as Ensign Howard, Army’s commission offer. seriously affect the Luftwaffe. The last flying Grumman F3F-2 fighters off Within weeks he was at Muroc Dry three months of 1943 saw the German the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise. Lake (now Edwards AFB, Calif.) flying Air Force fighter pilots holding a slight One-Man Air But impatient Howard had a yearn- the P-38, though he was leery of the edge as they struggled desperately ing for adventure and combat. In 1941, aircraft. “There we so many problems to defend German industry against he joined the American Volunteer with the P-38, it was cynically called daylight bombing. Group, better known as the Flying the engineer’s dream—as opposed to “All the German fighters had to do Tigers, and journeyed back to China. a pilot’s dream,” he recalled. was to wait until the last escort fighters Force Howard took quickly to AVG head turned back and then pounce on the Claire L. Chennault, particularly for A Pilot’s Dream bombers,” Howard summed up. P-40 fighter tactics. In January 1942, Howard was happier back in the P-47 Howard was stepping in to a brand- he became an ace, “an arbitrary title with Fourth Air Force. He rose quickly new mission—long-range fighter es- which is supposed to distinguish a to squadron command, and the summer cort—when the 354th arrived in Eng- fighter pilot who has achieved a high of 1943 found him preparing a new land. Arriving with no inkling of what level of success,” he wrote in his 1991 squadron for assignment to Europe. aircraft they would operate, the pilots autobiography, Roar of the Tiger. The bomber offensive in the winter were delighted to learn they’d be the Under Chennault, Howard also dem- of 1943 to 1944 was at its peak. In Au- first unit assigned to Ninth Air Force onstrated leadership qualities, rising to gust, the massed missions to Schwein- to fly the P-51B Mustang. became a squadron commander, then furt and Regensburg had claimed “All of the advance rumors of the group operations officer and head of horrific losses. P-51’s excellence proved true,” said the AVG’s confirmation board, which Eighth Air Force, in the fall of 1943, Howard. “It was a fighter pilot’s dream.” officially credited pilots with their either confined itself to targets in The P-51B Mustangs, with improved proven kills of Japanese aircraft. Four- France and the Low Countries within Merlin engines and extra fuel capacity, teen months of action also left him with the combat radius of the fighters, or began to arrive in England in late 1943. a debilitating case of dengue fever. He took the losses for deep attacks, as turned down a direct commission in at Schweinfurt. With attrition often Left: Howard in his P-51, dubbed Ding Hao! (Chinese for “Very Good”). Be- the US Army Air Forces when the AVG greater than 10 percent, the deep strike low: A German fighter attacks a dam- disbanded and headed home to St. Louis missions could not be sustained unless aged B-17 over Bremen in December to recuperate for the remainder of 1942. something changed. 1943. AIR FORCE Magazine / November 2010 61 fully alerted and formations by now struggling to stay together. The favor- ite prey of Luftwaffe pilots was a lone bomber that broke from the formation, perhaps crippled by flak or flying too slow, with a feathered engine. The “best place to find German fighters was in the vicinity of strug- gling Forts—they were like honey to the bee,” observed Howard. Howard’s 354th Fighter Group was tutored by the legendary Lt. Col. Don- ald J. M. Blakeslee. They learned to rendezvous with the bomber streams at 22,000 feet and got experience with missions to targets such as Kiel and Bremen, Germany. Howard found his 60 combat hours with the Flying Tigers served him well. By early December, Blakeslee deemed the 354th ready to operate on its own. Under the system of rotat- ing combat operations leads used by bomber and fighter groups, Howard Lt. Gen. Carl Spaatz (left) presented the Medal of Honor to Howard in London in and group commander Col. Kenneth June 1944. R. Martin took turns as combat lead. Howard’s experience was about to With drop tanks, the combat radius of started scanning the skies as soon as be tested as the new P-51Bs allowed the P-51B exceeded 880 miles. These they crossed the English Channel. Eighth Air Force to resume deep strikes “little friends” could fly from England Fighters assisted the formations in on Germany industry. The mission to to rendezvous with bomber formations relays, with groups covering assigned Oschersleben and Halberstadt—about over their targets deep in Germany, sections of the route. The fast silver 100 miles southwest of Berlin—was and help bring them home. flash of P-47s was a welcome sight, a return to the long-range bombing of “The only limitation of the P-51, if meaning relief from the incessant at- aircraft production plants so vital to the you could call it one, was the pilot,” tacks was at hand. Allied strategy. said Howard. Six-hour missions and The bomber escort mission was Gaining air superiority was the pre- the multitasking demands of flying, not like the wild flying Howard knew condition for an invasion of France, navigating, and tuning out German from his days in China. Air discipline and the Luftwaffe fighters had to be radar and jamming could be a strain. was everything. “If you’re out hound- whittled down. Targets included the Air tactics were about to change. dogging it alone, you’re asking for A.G.O Fleugzeugwerke, the principal With P-51s, fighter cover could be it because a formation of [Me] 109s center of FW 190 fighter production provided over the target as well as on who’ve spotted you from above will after the Marienburg plant had been ingress and egress. The relatively small certainly make mincemeat of you,” destroyed in October, and the Junkers numbers of P-51Bs in theater were Howard told his pilots. plant at Halberstadt, manufacturing responsible for validating the disputed wings for Ju 88s, according to the theory that long-range fighters could 500 German Fighters Army Air Forces’ official history.
Recommended publications
  • The Foundations of US Air Doctrine
    DISCLAIMER This study represents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education (CADRE) or the Department of the Air Force. This manuscript has been reviewed and cleared for public release by security and policy review authorities. iii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Watts, Barry D. The Foundations ofUS Air Doctrine . "December 1984 ." Bibliography : p. Includes index. 1. United States. Air Force. 2. Aeronautics, Military-United States. 3. Air warfare . I. Title. 11. Title: Foundations of US air doctrine . III. Title: Friction in war. UG633.W34 1984 358.4'00973 84-72550 355' .0215-dc 19 ISBN 1-58566-007-8 First Printing December 1984 Second Printing September 1991 ThirdPrinting July 1993 Fourth Printing May 1996 Fifth Printing January 1997 Sixth Printing June 1998 Seventh Printing July 2000 Eighth Printing June 2001 Ninth Printing September 2001 iv THE AUTHOR s Lieutenant Colonel Barry D. Watts (MA philosophy, University of Pittsburgh; BA mathematics, US Air Force Academy) has been teaching and writing about military theory since he joined the Air Force Academy faculty in 1974 . During the Vietnam War he saw combat with the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing at Ubon, Thailand, completing 100 missions over North Vietnam in June 1968. Subsequently, Lieutenant Colonel Watts flew F-4s from Yokota AB, Japan, and Kadena AB, Okinawa. More recently, he has served as a military assistant to the Director of Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and with the Air Staff's Project CHECKMATE.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St
    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
    [Show full text]
  • US, JAPANESE, and UK TELEVISUAL HIGH SCHOOLS, SPATIALITY, and the CONSTRUCTION of TEEN IDENTITY By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by British Columbia's network of post-secondary digital repositories BLOCKING THE SCHOOL PLAY: US, JAPANESE, AND UK TELEVISUAL HIGH SCHOOLS, SPATIALITY, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF TEEN IDENTITY by Jennifer Bomford B.A., University of Northern British Columbia, 1999 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2016 © Jennifer Bomford, 2016 ABSTRACT School spaces differ regionally and internationally, and this difference can be seen in television programmes featuring high schools. As television must always create its spaces and places on the screen, what, then, is the significance of the varying emphases as well as the commonalities constructed in televisual high school settings in UK, US, and Japanese television shows? This master’s thesis considers how fictional televisual high schools both contest and construct national identity. In order to do this, it posits the existence of the televisual school story, a descendant of the literary school story. It then compares the formal and narrative ways in which Glee (2009-2015), Hex (2004-2005), and Ouran koukou hosutobu (2006) deploy space and place to create identity on the screen. In particular, it examines how heteronormativity and gender roles affect the abilities of characters to move through spaces, across boundaries, and gain secure places of their own. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ii Table of Contents iii Acknowledgement v Introduction Orientation 1 Space and Place in Schools 5 Schools on TV 11 Schools on TV from Japan, 12 the U.S., and the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Xxix S E C\E T
    A. Fighter; Total claims against enemy aircraft during the month were 39-0-13 in the air and 1-0-2 on the ground. Missions 25 Sorties 296 d. Flak.— XIX TAC aircraft losses for the month because of flak Tons Bombs on Tgts 128 were unusually high. Out of the 50 aircraft lost, 35 were victims of Tons Frags 14.69 flak. The enemy, realizing that the greatest threat to the success of Tons Napalm 7.15 its ARD3NNBS salient was American air power, built up a very strong Tons Incendiaries 10.25 anti-aircraft defense around the entire area. Rockets 22 Claims (air) 4-1-1 The TTY TAC A-2 Flak Officer, reporting near the end of the Geraan retreat from the Bulge area, said: B. Reconnaissance: "The proportion of flak protection to troops and area involved (in Tac/R Sorties 58/36 1. INTRODUCTION. the ARDENNES area) was higher than in any previous operation in this P/R Sorties 7/6 war's history. Artillery sorties 4/2 a. General.— opening the year of 1945, the XIX Tactical Air Com­ mand-Third US Army team had a big job on its hands before it could re­ "Flak units were apparently given the highest priorities in supply C. Night Fighter: sume the assault of the SIEGFRIED LINE. The German breakthrough into of fuel and ammunition. They must also have been given a great degree of the ARDENNES had been checked but not yet smashed. The enemy columns freedom in moving over roads always taxed to capacity. Sorties 15 which had surged toward the MEUSE were beginning to withdraw, for the Claims (air) 1-0-0 v­ wily Rundstedt's best-laid plans had been wrecked on the rock of BAS­ "In addition to the tremendous quantities of mobile flak assigned TOGNS.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography United States Air Force
    BIOGRAPHY UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COLONEL ANTHONY (TONY) J. THOMAS Colonel Anthony J. Thomas is the Director, Cyberspace Opearions, 24th Air Force, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas. Colonel Thomas is responsible to the commander for Air Force Component and Combatant Commanders with trained and ready cyber forces which plan, direct and execute global cyberspace operations. Twenty-fourth Air Force and AFCYBER personnel build, operate, secure, defend and extend the Air Force portion of the Department of Defense global network. Joint Force Headquarters–Cyber (AFCYBER) personnel perform operational planning as part of coordinated efforts supporting Air Force Component and Combatant Commanders and, upon the approval of the President and/or the Secretary of Defense, the execution of offensive cyberspace operations. The colonel assists the commander in directingthe activities of two cyberspace wings and the 624th Operations Center, as well as the 5th Combat Communications Group. Colonel Thomas was born in Columbus, Ohio. He served as an enlisted professional and received his commission through the Reserve Officer Training Corps in 1989. He has commanded a cyber group, three communications squadrons; completed assignments at the Joint Staff, Air Staff, NATO, a MAJCOM, two direct reporting units; and served as the Chief C4I engineer in Operations Desert Shield/Storm, Southern Watch, and Restore Hope. EDUCATION: 1989 Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH. 1994 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. 1997 Master of Science degree in systems management of global telecommunications, Capital College, Md. 2002 Master of Science degree in military operational arts and sciences, Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala.
    [Show full text]
  • BNC Final Brief
    Succeeding in 21st Century Battle Network Competitions John Stillion and Bryan Clark Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 1 • Battle Network (BN) definition: – A combination of distributed target acquisition sensors (finders and damage assessors), command and control (deciders), weapons (shooters), and the electronic communications linking them together. • Essential BN attributes: – Enable shooters to engage targets they cannot “see” far more effectively than would otherwise be possible – Enable finders to achieve much higher levels of effectiveness as a group than they possess organically – Enable deciders to coordinate and prioritize tactical engagements at a much higher level of efficiency to achieve the desired operational effects – Enable those assessing the results of these operations (damage assessors) to determine their relative success with far greater accuracy than would otherwise be possible • BNs first emerged about 100 years ago but were relatively rare until recently due in part to the high cost of transmitting and processing information – This limited the number of BNs and the instances of BN competition • Declining cost and increasing power of information transmission and processing systems will likely spur BN proliferation, and with it BN competition 2 • Network attributes depend heavily on operational metrics • Tempo of operations influences decision to exploit or disrupt opposing network • “Virtual Attrition” is often more cost-effective than platform destruction • Competitions accelerate and culminate, then jump to new mode • In some cases one side or the other is “saved by the bell” when a conflict ends just before a competition jumps to a new mode 3 • Submarines vs. ASW – Examine competition with focus on BMC2, multi- domain elements, success of networked vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radar Game Understanding Stealth and Aircraft Survivability
    A MITCHELL INSTITUTE STUDY The Radar Game Understanding Stealth and Aircraft Survivability By Rebecca Grant September 2010 A mitchell inStitute Study 1 Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell On September 12, 1918 at St. Mihiel in France, Col. Wil- liam Mitchell became the first person ever to command a major force of allied aircraft in a combined-arms opera- tion. This battle was the debut of the US Army fighting under a single American commander on European soil. Under Mitchell’s control, more than 1,100 allied aircraft worked in unison with ground forces in a broad offen- sive—one encompassing not only the advance of ground troops but also direct air attacks on enemy strategic tar- gets, aircraft, communications, logistics, and forces beyond the front lines. Mitchell was promoted to Brigadier General by order of Gen. John J. Pershing, commander of the American Expeditionary Force, in recognition of his com- mand accomplishments during the St. Mihiel offensive and the subsequent Meuse-Argonne offensive. After World War I, General Mitchell served in Washington and then became Commander, First Provisional Air Brigade, in 1921. That summer, he led joint Army and Navy demonstration attacks as bombs delivered from aircraft sank several captured German vessels, including the SS Ostfriesland. His determination to speak the truth about airpower and its importance to America led to a court-martial trial in 1925. Mitchell was convicted, and re- signed from the service in February 1926. Mitchell, through personal example and through his writing, inspired and en- couraged a cadre of younger airmen. These included future General of the Air Force Henry H.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Medical Requirements
    Easy Access Rules for Medical Requirements EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published June 20201 Copyright notice © European Union, 1998-2020 Except where otherwise stated, reuse of the EUR-Lex data for commercial or non-commercial purposes is authorised provided the source is acknowledged ('© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/, 1998-2020') 2. 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. 2 Euro-Lex, Important Legal Notice: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/legal-notice/legal-notice.html. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 274| Jun 2020 Easy Access Rules for Medical Disclaimer Requirements DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated, consolidated, and easy-to-read publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Raf Bomber Command and No. 6 (Canadian) Group
    ANGLO-CANADIAN WARTIME RELATIONS, 1939-1945: RAF BOMBER COMMAND AND NO. 6 (CANADIAN) GROUP By (£) WILLIAMS. CARTER, B.A., M.A. Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University April 1989 ANGLO-CANADIAN WARTIME RELATIONS, 1939-1945: RAF BOMBER COMMAND AND NO. 6 (CANADIAN) GROUP DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1989) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (History) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Anglo-Canadian Wartime Relations, 1939-1945: RAF Bomber Command and No. 6 (Canadian) Group AUTHOR: Williams. Carter, B.A. (York University) M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor John P. Campbell NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 239 ii ABSTRACT In its broadest perspective the following thesis is a case study in Anglo-Canadian relations during the Second World War. The specific subject is the relationship between RAF Bomber Command and No. 6 (Canadian) Group, with emphasis on its political, operational (military), and social aspects. The Prologue describes the bombing raid on Dortmund of 6/7 October, 1944, and has two purposes. The first is to set the stage for the subsequent analysis of the Anglo­ Canadian relationship and to serve as a reminder of the underlying operational realities. The second is to show to what extent Canadian air power had grown during the war by highlighting the raid that was No. 6 Group's maximum effort of the bombing campaign. Chapter 1 deals with the political negotiations and problems associated with the creation of No. 6 Group on 25 October, 1942. The analysis begins with an account of how the Mackenzie King government placed all RCAF aircrew graduates of the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan at iii the disposal of the RAF and then had to negotiate for the right to concentrate RCAF aircrew overseas in their own squadrons and higher formations.
    [Show full text]
  • 121 Tactical Fighter Group
    121 TACTICAL FIGHTER GROUP MISSION LINEAGE 357 Fighter Group constituted and activated, 1 Dec 1942 Inactivated, 20 Aug 1946 Redesignated 121 Fighter Group and allotted to ANG (Ohio), 21 Aug 1946 Extended federal recognition, 26 Jun 1948 Redesignated 121 Fighter Bomber Group, 16 Oct 1952 Redesignated 121 Fighter Interceptor Group Redesignated 121 Tactical Fighter Group Inactivated, 10 Oct 1974 STATIONS Hamilton Field, CA, 1 Dec 1942 Tonopah AAFld, NV, 4 Mar 1943 7 Mar 1943 Santa Rosa AAFld, CA, 3 Jun 1943 Oroville AAFld, CA, 18 Aug 1943 Casper AAFld, WY, 7 Oct-9 Nov 1943 Raydon, England, 30 Nov 1943 1 Dec 1943 Leiston, England, 31 Jan 1944-8 Jul 1945 Neubiberg, Germany, 21 Jul 1945-20 Aug 1946 Dayton Municipal Airport, Vandalia, OH, 26 Jun 1948 Springfield Municipal Airport, Springfield, OH, Jun 1956 Lockbourne Air Force Base, OH, Nov 1958 Rickenbacker ANGB, Columbus, OH ASSIGNMENTS Ninth Air Force, 7 Dec 1943 Eighth Air Force, 30 Jan 1944 United States Air Forces in Europe WEAPON SYSTEMS P-39 P-51 COMMANDERS LTC Loring F. Stetson, Jr., 1 Dec 1942 LTC Edwin S. Chickering, 7 Jul 1943 Col Henry R. Spicer, 17 Feb 1944 Col Donald W. Graham, 7 Mar 1944 LTC John D. Landers, 11 Oct 1944 Col Irwin H. Dregne, 2 Dec 1944 LTC Andrew J. Evans Jr, 21 Jul 1945 LTC Wayne E. Rhynard, 20 Nov 1945 LTC Dale E. Shafer, (Acting 26 June 1948) Rodney Boren, 1 Sep 1948 Dale E. Shafer, 18 Oct 1951 Albert Line, 1960 Paul Hoover, 1962 Donald Griffith, 1964 John Taylor (Interim, 1971-1972) Donald Griffith, 1972 Harry Cochran, 1973 William Casey, 1973 HONORS Service Streamers Campaign Streamers Air Offensive, Europe Normandy Northern France Rhineland Ardennes-Alsace Central Europe Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers Decorations Distinguished Unit Citations Germany, 6 Mar and 29 Jun 1944 Derben, Germany, 14 Jan 1945 French Croix de Guerre with Palm 11 Feb 1944-15 Jan 1945 EMBLEM Per fess nebuly azure and or, in chief a chaplet azure and argent winged or, in base a cubit arm in armor brandishing a sword proper hiked bronze.
    [Show full text]