DOCSLIB.ORG

Cleopatra in Josephus: from Herod's Rival to the Wise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cleopatra in Josephus: from Herod's Rival to the Wise cleopatra in josephus 115 CLEOPATRA IN JOSEPHUS: FROM HEROD’S RIVAL TO THE WISE RULER’S OPPOSITE Jan Willem van Henten Introduction Cleopatra VII was the last Ptolemaic ruler, who for some time partly restored the huge Ptolemaic empire by using her unorthodox partner- ships with powerful Romans. Roman authors murdered her character after her and Antony’s demise at Actium in 31 bce. Cleopatra VII became world-famous as a most clever seductress through Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, which was strongly inspired by Plutarch’s biog- raphy of Antony. Elizabeth Taylor’s part of Cleopatra in Joseph L. Mankiewicz’s 1963 movie Cleopatra made her even more famous in our own age. Josephus is one of the most negative ancient sources about Cleopatra. He goes beyond the usual contempt for Cleopatra’s sexual immorality, greed and perverted hunger for power, and portrays her in Against Apion as the ultimately wicked foreign ruler. Josephus’ Cleopatra passages show an increasing tendency to blacken the famous and intelligent queen; so much so that Michael Grant concludes in his biography of Cleopatra that Josephus ‘is savagely biased against the queen’.1 Why is a separate discussion of the Cleopatra passages in Josephus useful? First, Cleopatra’s dealings with Herod the Great, as reported by Josephus, show two client rulers in action, fighting for Roman support and benefactions in very different ways. Second, the various Cleopatra passages have been treated before as one coherent cluster,2 but this approach does not do justice to the changes of Cleopatra’s image in Josephus’ works. Third, although Josephus’ descriptions show many parallels with statements by non-Jewish authors, there are some issues in his works that are remarkable if not altogether unique, and deserve further discussion. This contribution, therefore, aims at giving a survey 1 M. Grant, Cleopatra, London 1972 (repr. London 2001), 240. 2 I. Becher, Das Bild der Kleopatra in der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur, Berlin 1966, 63-8. 116 jan willem van henten of all Cleopatra passages in an ongoing discussion, while highlighting the differences between Josephus’ works.3 1. Cleopatra in the Jewish War Parallel passages that appear in the Antiquities and show only minor differences in comparison to the Jewish War will also be discussed in this section when relevant.4 Cleopatra is first mentioned in the Jewish War in connection with one of the unsuccessful Jewish delegations coming to Antony in order to protest against Herod and his brother Phasael, who took over the rule from Hyrcanus II (War 1.243//Antiquities 14.324). According to the Jewish War the location of Antony’s hearing of this delegation was Daphne near Antioch, upon the Orontes. The Antiquities passes over the location in silence, but briefly indicates its context by hinting at Antony and Cleopatra’s first meeting in Cili- cia, with the famous seduction scene on a golden barge in Tarsus in 41 bce.5 The important thing for us here is Josephus’ note in the margin that Antony ‘was already enslaved by his love for Cleopatra’ (’Antw,nion h;dh tw/| Kleopa,traj e;rwti dedoulwme,non) at this very early stage, whereas Roman authors suggest that Antony fell in love with Cleopatra at a much later date.6 Josephus’ not at all flattering state- ment about Antony, which anticipates Cleopatra’s attempts to make Antony act against Herod, is, in fact, only partly warranted by further events as told by Josephus. Antony was certainly extremely generous to Cleopatra, but there are clear cases where he did not give in to her when it did not match his or Rome’s interests (cf. below).7 Several Roman authors also suggest that Antony was Cleopatra’s slave.8 The 3 The relevant passages are: (1) Jewish War 1.243-4; 1.277-9; 1.359-61; 1.362-3; 1.365-7; 1.389-90; 1.396-7; 1.439-40; 7.300; (2) Antiquities 14.324; 14.374-6; 15.24, 28, 32, 45-6, 48, 62-3, 65, 75-9; 15.88-95; 15.96-103; 15.104-5; 15.106-7; 15.110; 15.115- 7; 15.131-2; 15.140; 15.191-2; 15.215, 217; 15.256-7; (3) Against Apion 2.56-61. 4 War 1.243//Antiquities 14.324; War 1.361//Antiquities 15.94-5; War 1.363 // Antiquities 15.104; War 1.365//Antiquities 15.110; War 1.367//Antiquities 15.115-7, 140; War 1.396-7//Antiquities 15.215, 217. 5 Plutarch, Ant. 26.1ff.; Strabo C 673f.; Appian, Bell. civ. 5.8; Cassius Dio 48.24.2. Many biographies of Cleopatra, more or less popular, have appeared, but the most balanced is still H. Volkmann, Kleopatra: Politik und Propaganda, Munich 1953. Cf. H. Schalit, König Herodes: Der Mann und Sein Werk, Berlin 20012, 69. 6 Livius, Periocha 130: 36 bce; Velleius Paterculus 2.82.3f.: 34 bce. 7 With Schalit, Herodes, 120..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Roman Province of Judea: a Historical Overview
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 36 Issue 3 Article 23 7-1-1996 The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview John F. Hall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Hall, John F. (1996) "The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 36 : Iss. 3 , Article 23. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol36/iss3/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hall: The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview p d tffieffiAinelixnealxAIX romansixulalealliki glnfin ns i u1uaihiihlanilni judeatairstfsuuctfa Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 1996 1 BYU Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, Iss. 3 [1996], Art. 23 the roman province judeaofiudeaofofjudea A historical overview john E hall the comingcoining of rome to judea romes acquisition ofofjudeajudea and subsequent involvement in the affairs of that long troubled area came about in largely indirect fashion for centuries judea had been under the control of the hel- lenilenisticstic greek monarchy centered in syria and known as the seleu- cid empire one of the successor states to the far greater empire of alexander the great who conquered the vast reaches of the persian empire toward the end of the fourth century
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illnesses of Herod the Great 1. Introduction 2. Sources of Information
    The illnesses of Herod the Great THE ILLNESSES OF HEROD THE GREAT ABSTRACT Herod the Great, Idumean by birth, was king of the Jews from 40BC to AD 4. An able statesman, builder and warrior, he ruthlessly stamped out all perceived opposi- tion to his rule. His last decade was characterised by vicious strife within his family and progressive ill health. We review the nature of his illnesses and suggest that he had meningoencephalitis in 59 BC, and that he died primarily of uraemia and hyper- tensive heart failure, but accept diabetes mellitus as a possible underlying etiological factor. The possibility that Josephus’s classical description of Herod’s disease could be biased by “topos” biography (popular at the time), is discussed. The latter conside- ration is particularly relevant in determining the significance of the king’s reputed worm- infested genital lesions. 1. INTRODUCTION Herod the Great, king of the Jews at the onset of the Christian era, had no Jewish blood in his veins. Infamous in Christian tradition for the massacre of the newborn in Bethlehem, he was nevertheless a vigorous and able ruler, a prolific builder, friend and ally of Rome and founder of an extensive Herodian dynasty which significantly influenced the history of Palestine. His miserable death at the age of 69 years was seen by the Jewish religious fraternity as Jahweh’s just retribution for his vio- lation of Judaic traditions (Ferguson 1987:328-330; Sizoo 1950:6-9). The nature and cause of his illness and death is the subject of this study. 2. SOURCES OF INFORMATION With the exception of fragmentary contributions from Rabbinic tradi- tions, Christian records in the New Testament and evidence from con- temporary coins, Herod’s biography comes to us predominantly through the writings of Flavius Josephus, a Jewish priest of aristocratic descent, military commander in a revolt against Rome, but subsequent recipient of Roman citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Herod I, Flavius Josephus, and Roman Bathing
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts HEROD I, FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, AND ROMAN BATHING: HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY IN DIALOG A Thesis in History by Jeffrey T. Herrick 2009 Jeffrey T. Herrick Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2009 The thesis of Jeffrey T. Herrick was reviewed and approved* by the following: Garrett G. Fagan Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies and History Thesis Advisor Paul B. Harvey Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, History, and Religious Studies, Head of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Ann E. Killebrew Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Jewish Studies, and Anthropology Carol Reardon Director of Graduate Studies in History; Professor of Military History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT In this thesis, I examine the historical and archaeological evidence for the baths built in late 1st century B.C.E by King Herod I of Judaea (commonly called ―the Great‖). In the modern period, many and diverse explanations of Herod‘s actions have been put forward, but previous approaches have often been hamstrung by inadequate and disproportionate use of either form of evidence. My analysis incorporates both forms while still keeping important criticisms of both in mind. Both forms of evidence, archaeological and historical, have biases, and it is important to consider their nuances and limitations as well as the information they offer. In the first chapter, I describe the most important previous approaches to the person of Herod and evaluate both the theoretical paradigms as well as the methodologies which governed them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2011 The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Perkins, Nancy, "The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism." (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1397. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1397 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _____________________ by Nancy Perkins December 2011 _____________________ William D. Burgess Jr., PhD, Chair Keith Green, PhD Henry Antkiewicz, PhD Keywords: Book of Enoch, Judaism, Second Temple ABSTRACT The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism by Nancy Perkins This thesis examines the ancient Jewish text the Book of Enoch, the scholarly work done on the text since its discovery in 1773, and its seminal importance to the study of ancient Jewish history. Primary sources for the thesis project are limited to Flavius Josephus and the works of the Old Testament. Modern scholars provide an abundance of secondary information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Borderlines of Herod the Great
    College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU Classics Faculty Publications Classics 2015 The Political Borderlines of Herod the Great Jason M. Schlude College of Saint Benedict/Saint John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/classics_pubs Recommended Citation This article was published as Jason M. Schlude. "The Political Borderlines of Herod the Great." University of Toronto Journal of Jewish Thought 5.1 (2015):9-21. Copyright 2015 by the University of Toronto Journal of Jewish Thought. THE POLITICAL BORDERLINES OF HEROD THE GREAT JASON M. SCHLUDE College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University _______________ his issue of the University of Toronto Journal of Jewish Thought celebrates the work of Daniel Boyarin and how it has enriched our understanding of cultural and social T borderlines in the history shared—and indeed actively constructed—by Jews and non-Jews. Often the concept of a borderline involves a boundary between two parties. Yet as Boyarin has shown in his research and writing, borderlines are more complex than that. The process of creating a borderline demands a negotiation of identity involving multiple parties. When discussing religious borderlines in late antiquity, these parties could be Christians, Jews and those branded heretics by each. In more modern times, these parties could be Christians, Jews and Muslims, as Boyarin points out in the preface of his namesake volume, Border Lines.1 Indeed, the process of determining borderlines is complex. One figure who demonstrates this complexity effectively is Herod the Great. Herod was a borderline figure in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews, Idumaeans, and Ancient Arabs
    Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 18 Jews, Idumaeans, and Ancient Arabs Relations of the Jews in Eretz-Israel with the Nations of the Frontier and the Desert during the Hellenistic and Roman Era (332 BCE - 70 CE) by Aryeh Kasher J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Tubingen 1988 CIP-Titelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Kasher, Aryeh: Jews, Idumaeans, and ancient Arabs : relations of the Jews in Eretz-Israel with the nations of the frontier and the desert during the Hellenistic and Roman era (332 BCE — 70 CE) / by Aryeh Kasher. - Tübingen : Mohr, 1988 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum ; 18) ISBN 3-16-145240-2 ISSN 0721-8753 NE: GT © 1988 J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) P. O. Box 2040, D-7400 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies paricularly to reproduc- tions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. Typeset by Sam Boyd Enterprise in Singapore; graphic work by Peter Schweitrieg in Stuttgart; printed by Guide-Druck GmbH in Tübingen; bound by Heinrich Koch KG in Tübingen. Printed in Germany. Dedicated to my venerable teacher Professor Joshua Efron Foreword The purpose of this book is to focus the interest of the educated reader, the student, and the research scholar on a topic which so far has not attrac- ted adequate monographic attention. This review of relations between the Jews in Eretz-Israel and the nations of the frontier and the desert is pre- sented in a chronological framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus' Jewish War and the Causes of the Jewish Revolt: Re-Examining Inevitability
    JOSEPHUS’ JEWISH WAR AND THE C AUSES OF THE JEWISH REVOLT: RE-EXAMINING INEVITABILITY Javier Lopez, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2013 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Lopez, Javier. Josephus’ Jewish War and the Causes of the Jewish Revolt: Re-Examining Inevitability. Master of Arts (History), December 2013, 85 pp., 3 tables, 3 illustrations, bibliography, 60 titles. The Jewish revolt against the Romans in 66 CE can be seen as the culmination of years of oppression at the hands of their Roman overlords. The first-century historian Josephus narrates the developments of the war and the events prior. A member of the priestly class and a general in the war, Josephus provides us a detailed account that has long troubled historians. This book was an attempt by Josephus to explain the nature of the war to his primary audience of predominantly angry and grieving Jews. The causes of the war are explained in different terms, ranging from Roman provincial administration, Jewish apocalypticism, and Jewish internal struggles. The Jews eventually reached a tipping point and engaged the Romans in open revolt. Josephus was adamant that the origin of the revolt remained with a few, youthful individuals who were able to persuade the country to rebel. This thesis emphasizes the causes of the war as Josephus saw them and how they are reflected both within The Jewish War and the later work Jewish Antiquities.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Herod, King of the Jews
    12. Herod, King of the Jews 12.0 How Did the Hasmonean Dynasty Transition to the Dynasty of Herod? Salome Alexandra (r. 76-69 BCE) Q (d. 69 BCE) Hyrcanus II (r. 69-69 BCE) K (76-69 and 63-41) HP Aristobulus II (r. 69-63 BCE) HP, K (47-40 BCE) E (d. 30 BCE) (d. 49 BCE) Alexandra (d. 27 BCE) ---- m ----- Alexander (d. 49 BCE) Antigonus (r. 40-37 BCE) HP, K (d. 37 BCE) Aristobulus III Mariamne ---- m ------ Herod. (r. 37-4 BCE) K. (d.@4 BCE) No pun intended, the transition had a lot to do with a Jewish princess. In this case it was a Hasmonean princess named Mariamne. Some years before Aristobulus II and his son died rebelling against the Romans, the son Alexander and his wife Alexandra had two children; a son named Aristobulus III and a daughter named Mariamne When Herod became King, he had been betrothed to Mariamne. Since Mariamne’s father was a Hasmonean, even though a rebellious one, Herod hoped that this marriage would give him greater legitimacy in the eyes of those still faithful to the Torah. Herod waited until he became King before marrying Mariamne. Herod also made Mariamne’s brother, Aristobulus III, the High Priest in Jerusalem. A year later, he had him drowned while bathing in a river. It is said, however, that Mariamne was the true love of Herod’s life 12.1 Did Herod the Great Marry? Oh yes! Often! Wife Children 1. Doris Antipater III 2. Mariamne I Alexander, Aristobulus IV, Salampsio (d), Cypros (d) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Illness of Herod the Great, King of Judaea
    THE LAST ILLNESS OF HEROD THE GREAT, KING OF JUDAEA by A. T. SANDISON NTRODUCTION FOR most of us living in the second half of the twentieth century, Herod the Great re- mains a shadowy figure who is recalled only at Christmas when we read ofhis massacre ofthe innocents (Matt. 2:16). He is even confused with Herod Agrippa who persecuted the Church and also died a miserable death (Acts 12:23). Our ancestors, however, were better informed since they often kept, on the same shelf as the Family Bible, a copy of Whiston's Works ofFlavius Josephus. Josephus in his Jewish Antiquities and Jewish War gives a vivid account of the life of Herod the Great. Flavius Josephus, an aristocratic Jew, was born Joseph ben Mathias in A.D. 37-38. He took part in the Jewish revolt in Galilee and was captured at Iotapata by the Romans in A.D. 67. Josephus prophesied that the victor, Vespasian, would rise to Imperial power and Vespasian was, in fact, raised to the purple in A.D. 69. Josephus accompanied Titus to the Siege of Jerusalem and thereafter spent 30 years or more in Rome, taking citizenship there. After the death of Titus he became historian and apologist of the Jewish nation. Thackeray (1929) assesses him as an egoist, self-centred and time serving, and a flatterer of his Roman patrons. He had nevertheless great merits and contributed much to learning and history. His Contra Apionem is a fine apologia for Judaism. Our main sources of information concerning Herod the Great are his histories and these in turn are based on works of Nicolas of Damascus, a close relative of Herod and friend of the Emperor Augustus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battle 2000 Years in the Making Luke 3:1-2
    John the Baptist A battle 2000 years in the making Luke 3:1-2 EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Luke 3 1 Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip was tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene, 2 in the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John, the son of Zacharias, in the wilderness. EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 •19 Now these are the records of the generations of Isaac, Abraham’s son: Abraham became the father of Isaac; 20 and Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah, the daughter of Bethuel the Aramean of Paddan-aram, the sister of Laban the Aramean, to be his wife. 21 Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord answered him and Rebekah his wife conceived. 22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If it is so, why then am I this way?” So she went to inquire of the Lord. 23 The Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the older shall serve the younger.” EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 24 When her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb. 25 Now the first came forth red, all over like a hairy garment; and they named him Esau.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HERODIANS: a CASE of DISPUTED IDENTITY a REVIEW ARTICLE of NIKOS KOKKINOS, the HERODIAN DYNASTY 1 David J
    Tyndale Bulletin 53.2 (2002) 223-238. THE HERODIANS: A CASE OF DISPUTED IDENTITY A REVIEW ARTICLE OF NIKOS KOKKINOS, THE HERODIAN DYNASTY 1 David J. Bryan I. Introduction At a time when there is a renewed interest in Herod, Nikos Kokkinos has recently offered a welcome study which seeks to present a social and family history rather than focus upon important individuals. In so doing, Kokkinos set out to fill what he perceives to be a lacuna in Herodian studies by looking at the story of the dynasty from beginning to end. Along the way he investigated the following subjects: • the origins of the family; • the social and political conditions of Idumaea in the 2nd century BCE; • the strongly Hellenized ideology of Herod the Great; • the complexity of his genealogy; • the status of the members of his family in Roman Judaea after Archelaus’ fall; • the role of the dynasty during the first Jewish revolt; • the centrality of the dynasty in the workings of the Roman Empire in the east; • the gradual eclipse of Agrippa II; • the transfer of Herodian power to the wider Greek world in the second century CE. Kokkinos tackled these with the confidence of a classical historian who has an impressive knowledge of the main literary sources and the extant documentary evidence (epigraphic, papyrological, numismatic and archaeological). Scholars will appreciate in particular Part II, ‘The 1 The Herodian Dynasty: Origins, Role in Society and Eclipse (JSPS 30; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998). 224 TYNDALE BULLETIN 53.2 (2002) Herodian Family and Social Structure’, which is a detailed analysis of the 144 members of the family that are mentioned or implied in the texts and sources.
    [Show full text]