NANJING ECHO: ILLUSION, SUBTERFUGE AND PUBLIC RELATIONS IN THE ‘RAPE OF NANKING' DEBATE Randy Hopkins Portland, Oregon
[email protected] November 17, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 The Camouflaged Hand of Japan’s Foreign Ministry 1 “Modern, Objective and Scientific Historiography” 3 Joshua Fogel and “Controversy” 4 Hata Ikuhiko’s “Fact and Fable” and the “Great Massacre” 15 Alvin Coox and “Waking Old Wounds” 29 Conclusion 38 Appendix (Hata’s Errata List) 41 copyright @ Randy Hopkins, 2017 Introduction December 13, 2017 marks the 80th Anniversary of the Japanese Imperial Army’s seizure of Nanjing, then capital of Nationalist China. What occurred next, with alleged weeks of mass executions, rapes, torture, looting and arson, is steeped in controversy and poisons relations be- tween China, Japan and their peoples to this day. This year is also the 20th Anniversary of Iris Chang’s The Rape of Nanking: The Forgot- ten Holocaust of World War II (New York: Basic Books, 1997) (“The Rape of Nanking”). Weav- ing contemporaneous letters and diaries, government intelligence reports, war crime investiga- tions and testimony with modern oral history, The Rape of Nanking was a, if not the J’accuse …! of the 20th Century. The Rape of Nanking arrived at a time when events at Nanjing had largely been forgotten in the English language West. That could no longer be said after the book’s ap- pearance. Chang’s book achieved remarkable sales and was showered with praise from leading academic historians and others. Chang herself, a mere 29 years of age when the book was pub- lished, was feted at book signings and other public events.