Beckett and the Refusal Of... Judgment: the Question of Ethics and the Value of Art

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beckett and the Refusal Of... Judgment: the Question of Ethics and the Value of Art BECKETT AND THE REFUSAL OF... 265 Beckett and the Refusal of... Judgment: The Question of Ethics and the Value of Art Mireille Bousquet (Université Paris-8 – Vincennes – Saint-Denis, France) Beckett’s work brings into the open various processes of indeterminacy, among them the absence of definite statement, the rhetorical question, and a writing that operates through decomposition and rearrangement, giving rise to new and infinite possibilities of meaning. Beckett himself provided few clues about the significance of his work–telling Tom Driver that the key word in his work is “perhaps,” and going so far as to explicitly assert the impossibility of judgment in conversation with Charles Juliet. The refusal of judgment raises the difficult question of the place of ethics in Beckett’s work; it also resonates suggestively with Gilles Deleuze’s own proposals “for having done with” this problem. This article will consider the possibility that Beckett’s texts may provide a different sense of the ethical than that given by the philosophers. Examining his work in this light will reveal the problematic mutual implication of questions of art, ethics and language. The acknowledgement that a fundamental indecision characterizes Samuel Beckett’s oeuvre is one of the stumbling blocks of criticism and is indicative of how language and art operate in his work. Georges Bataille was among the first to align himself with this position and uses the term “indifference” when speaking of a book which “explores with an unflinch- ing irony the extreme possibilities of indifference and misery.”1 In particu- lar, he analyzes the workings of the author-reader relation as one of attack: 1 Georges Bataille, “Georges Bataille in ‘Critique,’” in Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage, eds. Lawrence Graver and Raymond Federman (New York and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979), 64. 266 SOFIA PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW This frantic progress toward ruin that animates the book, which, being the author’s attack on the reader, is such that not for an instant is the latter given the leisure to withdraw into indiffer- ence–could it have been produced if so persuasive a conviction did not originate in some powerful motive? Certainly, here all reasonable hopes and plans are engulfed in indifference. (64, 65) The analysis unfolds by way of the question of meaning and touches one of the most eminently problematic points of Beckett’s work: “the only meaning in all this lies in the fact that nonsense in its own way makes sense; a parody of meaning, perhaps, but finally a distinct meaning, which is to ob- scure within us the world of significations” (64). Once this indifference is extended to the whole of the work, inclusive of the author,2 and even his readership, the stakes are truly of an ethical or- der. Bataille concludes logically: to such a “limping, imperfect indifference, how can one after all not be indifferent?” (67). If the indifference that car- ries the work overwhelms the reader and elicits the same attitude in return, it becomes truly a matter of surprise that this limit-work should still find an audience! Doubtless it is because the force of this generalized indifference has the power to create its own capacity for regeneration. Bruno Clément’s findings in L’Oeuvre sans qualités apply with equal validity to the assertion of indifference and to the refusal to choose. The figure of epanorthosis, which, for Clément, characterizes Beckett’s work, is capable of figuring that which would be simultaneously form and movement, while, on the other hand, it carries a certain value, that of the absence of choice: In effect, epanorthosis is selected not because it allows, at almost each of its moments and places, the work to summon terms whose existence and relevance it would recognize and be- tween which it would never have to choose, but because the poles 2 It is moreover to this excess of indifference that Bataille attributes the comic base of the narrative: “An author writing while consumed with indifference to what he writes might seem to be acting out a comedy” (67; trans. modified). BECKETT AND THE REFUSAL OF... 267 that it names without disdain are for the work nothing more than empty places for dead objects.3 According to Clément the effect produced by the work is one of hesi- tation: Of course the statement of the question imposes, simultane- ously with the question, the terms in which it is posed. Above all, through the play of alternatives, it imposes its skillfully constructed ambiguity. Thus it says: either the sketch is the reflection of its ob- ject or it betrays the incapacity [...] of the subject. [...] Yet all that counts is the object produced by the text: hesitation. (421) Clément concludes his analysis with the state of perplexity of the reader (necessarily his lot): … nothing is as we thought. There is certainly someone, something, this moment is probably datable, this place locatable and there is well and truly a text. But we know nothing more. (425) Clément thus draws attention to the process of unlearning that Beckett induces in the reader. But this process of apprenticeship in reverse leads the reader to confront the interrogation to which the text gives rise. The old cer- tainties are truly undone, but nothing comes to replace them. If hesitation is in fact the sole object produced by the text, then it must be conceded that critical and interpretive reading reflects its own questions, as in a game of mirrors: only hesitation responds to the reader’s interrogation. This surely accounts for a good part of the fascination that Beckett’s work exercises, and poses a significant problem for criticism to the extent that the latter claims to formulate answers. So it is hardly surprising that, generally speak- ing, the critical gesture comes to the conclusion of indifference. Let us take up, as another case, the example of Leslie Hill, whose study of Beckettian discourse leads to the same conclusion of indifference. 3 Bruno Clément, L’Oeuvre sans qualités: rhétorique de Samuel Beckett (Paris: Seuil, 1994), 242. 268 SOFIA PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW According to Hill, the indetermination of which he gives an account consti- tutes an aporia,4 and his reading arises out of a careful examination of phi- losophies of language that take the side of the unnamable, thereby treating language as a problem of nomination, and looking for a way out: Beckett’s work pursues one end, which is the end of lan- guage. The end of language, however, never comes. Or rather it has always already taken place. Beckett writes in the name of something which has no name, but to which he struggles to give a name. That something is what throughout this book, for my part, I have named: indifference. Yet indifference is not stasis. It is the infinity of difference, the erasure of identity and the still turbu- lence at the centre of language and the body. (62) …[R]repeatedly [...] the writing refuses to allow itself to be read as some form of coded message [...] it does this in part by denying its own binary logic and stability. (62) The problem here is of knowing whether it is Beckett’s writing that re- fuses to be decoded, as if this were implicitly a function of all language, or whether we are dealing with a dubious conception of language, which the work itself criticizes. Additionally Hill’s conclusion broods over the ques- tion of negativity in Beckett, a negativity that is first of all tied to a concep- tion of language – even if Hill’s reflection on indifference is very strong, particularly when he speaks of an “infinity of difference,” it raises genuine questions while analyzing the ambivalent character of a work that invites in- terpretation even as it refuses it: What is left is a binary opposition which invites or solicits interpretation, yet refuses any contextual framework for interpre- tation. The contrast becomes crucial and indeterminate, signifi- 4 “In Beckett, aporia is usually signalled by devices such as the careful rhetorical bal- ancing of contradictory periods, the repeated use of terms like ‘d’un côté’ or ‘d’un autre côté,’ ‘peut-être,’ and the fondness for unanswerable rhetorical questions” (Les- lie Hill, Beckett’s Fiction: In Different Words [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990], 62). BECKETT AND THE REFUSAL OF... 269 cant yet devoid of meaning. (62) How, in the end, is this negativity a problem? Perhaps because, in the last instance, everything that can be regarded as critical discourse leads to the assertion, which is to say the impasse, of aporia? Perhaps also because one senses here a kind of critical impotence, a renunciation that compels an exit from the work, to take the air as it were? From this point of view, Hill’s conclusion is remarkable: Negativity in Beckett’s work does not allow redemption; the issues it raises cannot be resolved by dialectical decision, by the covert imposition of a body of beliefs or doctrines. The force of indifference in Beckett’s writing cannot be incorporated. That is its definition. This is why, for this book at least, there is no exit from the labyrinth. The heavens, however, continue to gleam and one may still get a sight of the sun and the other stars. (187) Happily consolation is possible, but it is to be sought outside of the work, in the real world. Despite or alongside this force of indifference, another force is con- tinuously at work, the on: “I must go on.” For Shane Weller, the undecid- able character of the work is tied to this necessity of going on, to this im- perative that draws in its wake a questioning of ethics.
Recommended publications
  • Teaching the Short Story: a Guide to Using Stories from Around the World. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 397 453 CS 215 435 AUTHOR Neumann, Bonnie H., Ed.; McDonnell, Helen M., Ed. TITLE Teaching the Short Story: A Guide to Using Stories from around the World. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1947-6 PUB DATE 96 NOTE 311p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 19476: $15.95 members, $21.95 nonmembers). PUB 'TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) Collected Works General (020) Books (010) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Authors; Higher Education; High Schools; *Literary Criticism; Literary Devices; *Literature Appreciation; Multicultural Education; *Short Stories; *World Literature IDENTIFIERS *Comparative Literature; *Literature in Translation; Response to Literature ABSTRACT An innovative and practical resource for teachers looking to move beyond English and American works, this book explores 175 highly teachable short stories from nearly 50 countries, highlighting the work of recognized authors from practically every continent, authors such as Chinua Achebe, Anita Desai, Nadine Gordimer, Milan Kundera, Isak Dinesen, Octavio Paz, Jorge Amado, and Yukio Mishima. The stories in the book were selected and annotated by experienced teachers, and include information about the author, a synopsis of the story, and comparisons to frequently anthologized stories and readily available literary and artistic works. Also provided are six practical indexes, including those'that help teachers select short stories by title, country of origin, English-languag- source, comparison by themes, or comparison by literary devices. The final index, the cross-reference index, summarizes all the comparative material cited within the book,with the titles of annotated books appearing in capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Stories
    The Complete Stories by Franz Kafka a.b.e-book v3.0 / Notes at the end Back Cover : "An important book, valuable in itself and absolutely fascinating. The stories are dreamlike, allegorical, symbolic, parabolic, grotesque, ritualistic, nasty, lucent, extremely personal, ghoulishly detached, exquisitely comic. numinous and prophetic." -- New York Times "The Complete Stories is an encyclopedia of our insecurities and our brave attempts to oppose them." -- Anatole Broyard Franz Kafka wrote continuously and furiously throughout his short and intensely lived life, but only allowed a fraction of his work to be published during his lifetime. Shortly before his death at the age of forty, he instructed Max Brod, his friend and literary executor, to burn all his remaining works of fiction. Fortunately, Brod disobeyed. Page 1 The Complete Stories brings together all of Kafka's stories, from the classic tales such as "The Metamorphosis," "In the Penal Colony" and "The Hunger Artist" to less-known, shorter pieces and fragments Brod released after Kafka's death; with the exception of his three novels, the whole of Kafka's narrative work is included in this volume. The remarkable depth and breadth of his brilliant and probing imagination become even more evident when these stories are seen as a whole. This edition also features a fascinating introduction by John Updike, a chronology of Kafka's life, and a selected bibliography of critical writings about Kafka. Copyright © 1971 by Schocken Books Inc. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Schocken Books Inc., New York. Distributed by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Filmography V6.Indd
    a filmography Foreword by The Irish Film Institute For over 60 years, the Irish Film Institute has been dedicated to the promotion of film culture in Ireland and therefore is proud to present this filmography of Samuel Beckett’s work. Beckett remains one of Ireland’s most important and influential artists and Samuel Beckett – A Filmography provides a snapshot of the worldwide reach and enduring nature of his creativity. As part of the Beckett centenary celebrations held in April 2006, the Irish Film Institute organised a diverse programme of films relating to the work of Beckett, including a tour of the line-up to cinemas around the country. Prior to this, the Irish Film Institute provided the unique opportunity to view all 19 films in the ‘Beckett on Film’ series by screening the entire selection in February 2001. This filmography provides the perfect accompaniment to these previous programmes and it illustrates that Beckett’s work will continue to be adapted for film and television worldwide for years to come. Photograph by Richard Avedon Samuel Beckett – A Filmography was made possible though the kind support of the Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism and the Beckett Centenary Council and Festival Committee. Mark Mulqueen Director, The Irish Film Institute An Introduction Compiling a filmography of Beckett’s work is both a challenging and daunting prospect. It was important, from the outset, to set some parameters for this filmography. Therefore, to this end, I decided to focus on the key area of direct adaptations of Beckett’s work filmed for cinema or television.
    [Show full text]
  • The Material of Film and the Idea of Cinema: Contrasting Practices in Sixties and Seventies Avant-Garde Film*
    The Material of Film and the Idea of Cinema: Contrasting Practices in Sixties and Seventies Avant-Garde Film* JONATHAN WALLEY I In 1976, the American Federation of Arts organized a major program of American avant-garde films made since the early 1940s. In his introduction to the program’s catalog, Whitney film curator and series organizer John Hanhardt argued that the central preoccupation of filmmakers across the history of avant-garde cinema had been with the exploration of the material properties of the film medium itself: “This cinema subverts cinematic convention by exploring its medium and its properties and materials, and in the process creates its own history separate from that of the classical narrative cinema. It is filmmaking that creates itself out of its own experience.”1 Having traced the history of avant-garde film according to the modernist notion that an art form advances by reflexively scrutinizing the “properties and materials” of its medium, Hanhardt turned his attention to more recent developments. But these new developments were not entirely receptive to his modernist model. On the one hand, he argued, filmmakers were continuing to create works that engaged the physical materials of film—film strip, projector, camera, and screen—and the range of effects these made possible. On the other, this engagement appeared to be leading some filmmakers to create cinematic works challenging the material limits of the film medium as it had been defined for over eighty years. For example, in Anthony McCall’s Line Describing a Cone (1973), the focus of the viewer’s attention was not an image projected onto a screen, but the projector beam itself, which over the course of thirty minutes grew from a thin line of light to a cone—a three-dimensional light sculpture with which the viewer could interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett's Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby
    This is a repository copy of Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/129513/ Version: Published Version Article: Piette, A.C. (2014) Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 22. pp. 81-90. ISSN 2386-3935 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett's Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby Adam PIETTE University of Sheffield, UK School of English [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper looks at two late texts written in 1981 by Samuel Beckett, the novel Ill Seen Ill Said and the play Rockaby, and reads them as difficult Oedipal elegies for his mother May Beckett who had died thirty years previously. The close reading of the texts brings out the conflicted psychoanalytic contradictions of the representations, especially the son’s strange identification with the mother brought on by the fact Beckett was himself approaching his mother’s age when she died.
    [Show full text]
  • Modes of Being and Time in the Theatre of Samuel Beckett
    f.'lODES Ol!' BEING AND TIME IN THE THEATRE OF SANUEL BECKETT MODES OF BEING AND TIME IN THE THEATRE OF SAMUEL BECKETT By ANNA E.V. PRETO, B.A., LICENCE ES LETTRES A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree TvIaster of Arts !-1cMaster Uni versi ty October 1974 MASTER OF ARTS (1974) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Romance Languages) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Modes of Being and Time in the Theatre of Samuel Beckett AUTHOR: Anna E.V. Preto, B.A. (University of British Columbia) Licence es Lettres (Universite de Grenoble) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Brian S. Pocknell NUNBER OF PAGES: vi, 163 ii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Brian S. Pocknell for his interest, his encouragement and counsel in the patient supervision of this dissertation. I also wish to thank McMaster University for its generous financial assistance. iii CONTENTS I An Introduction to the Beckett Situation 1 II Being on the Threshold to Eternity: Waiting for Godot and Endgame 35 III The Facets of the Prism: Beckett's Remaining Plays 74 IV The Language of the Characters and Time 117 Conclusion 147 Bibliography 153 iv PREFACE Beckett as an author has inspired an impressive range of critical studies to date. The imposing amounts of critical material bear witness to the richness of his writings, which present a wealth of themes and techniques. His plays concentrate for us the problem-themes that already concerned him in his earlier prose works, and bring them to the stage in a more streamlined form. The essential problem which evolves from Beckett's own earlier writings comes to the fore, downstage, in the plays: it is that of being in time, a purgatorial state, the lot of mankind and of Beckett's characters, who are representative of mankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy
    Collected Shorter Plays Works by Samuel Beckett published by Grove Press Cas cando Mercier and Camier Collected Poems in Molloy English and French More Pricks Than Kicks The Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy Company Nohow On (Company, Seen Disjecta Said, Worstward Ho) Endgame Ill Ohio Impromptu Ends and Odds Ill Proust First Love and Other Stories Rockaby Happy Days Stories and Texts How It Is for Nothing I Can't Go On, I'll Go On Three Novels Krapp Last Tape Waiting for Godot The Lost Ones Watt s Malone Dies Worstward Ho Happy Days: Samuel Beckett's Production Notebooks, edited by James Knowlson Samuel Beckett: The Complete Short Prose, 1929-/989, edited and with an introduction and notes by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Endgame, edited by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Krapp's Last Tape, edited by James Knowlson The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Waiting for Godot, edited by Dougald McMillan and James Knowlson COLLECTED SHORTER PLAYS SAMUEL BECKETT Grove Press New York Copyright© 1984 by Samuel Beckett All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, by any means, including mechanical, electronic, photocopying,recording, or otherwise,without prior written permission of the publisher. Grove Press 841 Broadway New York, NY 10003 All That Fall © Samuel Beckett, 1957; Act Without Words I © Samuel Beckett, 1959; Act Without Words II© Samuel Beckett,1959; Krapp's Last 'Ihpe© Samuel Beckett,1958; Rough for Theatre I © Samuel Beckett, 1976; Rough for Theatre II© Samuel Beckett,1976; Embers © Samuel Beckett,1959; Rough for Radio I© Samuel Beckett,1976; Rough forRadio II© Samuel Beckett, 1976; Words and Music © Samuel Beckett,1962; Cascando© Samuel Beckett, 1963; Play © Samuel Beckett, 1963; Film © Samuel Beckett, 1967; The Old Tune, adapt.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHEARD FOOTFALLS ONL Y SOUND: "Neither" in Translation
    UNHEARD FOOTFALLS ONLY SOUND: "neither" in Translation neither to and fro in shadow from inner to outer shadow from impenetrable self to impenetrable uns elf by way of neither as between two lit refuges whose doors once neared gently closed, once turned away from gently part again beckoned back and forth and turned away heedless of the way, intent on the one gleam or the other unheard footfalls only sound till at last halt for good, absent for good from self and other then no sound then gently light unfading on that unheeded neither unspeakable horne For a translation workshop on Beckett's "neither" eight partIClpants from six different language backgrounds each prepared a translation in his or her own language, as well as a literal translation back into English. Through a discussion of the problems each translator encountered, the session became an exercise in elose reading and literary criticism as weIl as an opportunity to compare the linguistic and cultural translating difficulties presented by various languages. Erika Tophoven - Germany (Erika Tophoven-Schöningh and the late Elmar Tophoven are the two authorized translators of Beckett's work into German) : I started translating Beckett together with my husband in 1957. All That Fall was Beckett's first text in English that we did. Because my husband was not very good in English and I had just finished my English studies, I helped hirn. The whole oeuvre has been translated into German by uso After my husband's death I continued alone with Stirrings Still and Le monde et le pantalon. I keep all the material (notes) and correspondence for later study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychic Structure of the Couple in Waiting for Godot Mary F. Catanzaro*
    Fall 1986 87 The Psychic Structure of the Couple in Waiting for Godot Mary F. Catanzaro* With Waiting for Godot, Beckett expands the concept of the * 'pseudocou­ ple' ' that he had begun in Mercier and Gamier. He returns also to the problem of the self as a succession of always subverted beings, ever subject to the process of a continually decanting time—the same problem he had probed in his very early Proust (1931). The playing at master and servant, the switching of roles, and the manipulation of props in order to achieve mastery (which make up the bulk of Mercier and Gamier) do not concern him here as much as the sense of failure and incompleteness that these activities, so feverishly engaged in, seem to evoke. While Mercier and Camier relate to each other through their objects, Vladimir and Estragon interact through their language. Aside from the tree, their language behaves as the major dramatic prop, and it creates a blurring in their characters because language is (im)material to begin with and works through time, habit, and memory. What permits their language to become an object is the presence of the absent third party, Godot, who affects an unresolved duality in the structure of the pseudocouple's consciousness. Their existence is an example of the Berkeleian dictum, esse est percipi, in that their conception of To Be is to belong to and be seen by someone else. But their state of waiting elicits an absence within them because Godot is not there. In this way Beckett comes closer to the center of being, which Sartre tells us, in now classical existentialism, is haunted with nothingness, although we are in these post-Heideggerian times jaundiced about the existence of being and more inclined, as in Lacanian thought, to approach whatever it is that is not there as a lack, which produces never-ceasing desire.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadows with Feldman and Beckett
    In the Shadows with Feldman and Beckett by John Dwyer This article was first published in the “Lively Arts” section of the Buffalo Evening News on Saturday, November 27, 1976. John Dwyer was News Critic of the newspaper at the time. Thanks to the Music Library, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, for providing a copy of the original article from their collection of the Morton Feldman Papers. [Footnotes added 2016.] * * * BECKETT (thoughtful silence): I don’t like opera. FELDMAN: I don’t like it, either. BECKETT (silence): I don’t like my words set to music. FELDMAN: Not thinking of dialogue. Haven’t used it once in 25 years. I don’t like words to music, myself. BECKETT (silence): What do you want? FELDMAN: I have no idea. It is partly by accident, somewhat by intent, the whole thing transpiring in the shadowy metier of a play by Samuel Beckett. As well it might, with the slight difference that it’s from real life, and Beckett himself is one of the players. * * * TIME: Last mid-September, around noon. SCENE I: A small, very dark theatre in Berlin, the Schiller, in between rehearsals. CHARACTERS: Irish-born, Paris-based, 70-year-old poet and dramatist Samuel Beckett, in Berlin to direct one of his plays in a Beckett Festival. It is in German. American composer Morton Feldman, late 40s, one of the enfants terrible of Greenwich Village in the 1950s, now Buffalo-based UB Varese Professor and director of the June in Buffalo Festival. * * * SITUATION: Feldman has been in Glasgow to hear his new piece, “Orchestra,” performed by the National Orchestra of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beckett Collection Ruby Cohn Correspondence 1959-1989
    The Beckett Collection Ruby Cohn correspondence 1959-1989 Summary description Held at: Beckett International Foundation, University of Reading Title: The Correspondence of Ruby Cohn Dates of creation: 1959 – 1989 Reference: Beckett Collection--Correspondence/COH Extent: 205 letters and postcards from Samuel Beckett to Ruby Cohn 1 telex message from Beckett to Cohn 1 telegram from Beckett to Cohn 1 postcard addressed to Georges Cravenne 5 letters from Cohn to Beckett (which include Beckett’s responses) 1 envelope containing a typescript of third section of Stirrings Still 2 empty envelopes addressed to Cohn Language of material English unless otherwise stated Administrative information Immediate source of acquisition The correspondence was donated to the Beckett International Foundation by Ruby Cohn in 2002. Copyright/Reproduction Permission to quote from, or reproduce, material from this correspondence collection is required from the Samuel Beckett Estate before publication. Preferred Citation Preferred citation: Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Ruby Cohn, Beckett International Foundation, Reading University Library (RUL MS 5100) Access conditions Photocopies of the original materials are available for use in the Reading Room. Access to the original letters is restricted. Historical Note 1922, 13 Aug. Born Ruby Burman in Columbus, Ohio 1942 Awarded a BA degree from Hunter College of the City of New York 1946 Married Melvin Cohn (they divorced in 1961) 1952 Awarded a doctorate from the University of Paris 1960 Awarded a second doctorate from Washington University (Saint Louis, Mo.) 1961-1968 Professor of English and Comparative Literature at San Francisco State University 1969-1971 Fellow at the California Institute of the Arts 1972-1992 Professor of Comparative Drama at the University of California, Davis 1992-Present Professor Emerita of Comparative Drama at the University of California, Davis Ruby Cohn (née Burman) was born on 13 August 1922 in Columbus, Ohio, where her father, Peter Burman, was a veterinary student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silencing of the Sphinx Volume Interpreting Samuel Beckett's
    Interpreting Samuel Beckett's 'Worstward Ho' Hisgen, Ruud Citation Hisgen, R. (1998, December 9). Interpreting Samuel Beckett's 'Worstward Ho'. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4924 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis License: in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4924 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). The Silencing of the Sphinx Volume Interpreting Samuel Beckett’s Worstward Ho [Frontispiece ] Interpreting Samuel Beckett’s Worstward Ho Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Dr W.A. Wagenaar, hoogleraar in de Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op woensdag december te klokke . uur door Rudolf Guus Wim Hisgen geboren te ’s Gravenhage in Universiteit Leiden Promotor: Professor Dr. Th.L. D’haen Referent: Professor J. Pilling, University of Reading (G.B.) Promotiecommissie: Professor Dr. B. Westerweel Professor Dr. A.G.H. Anbeek van der Meyden Professor G. Lernout, Universiteit Antwerpen (België) CONTENTS Abbreviations Used . Introduction . Notes to the Introduction . Chapter , “Argument” . Notes to Chapter . Chapter , “Language” . Notes to Chapter . Chapter , “Roots” . Notes to Chapter . Chapter , “Reverberations” . Notes to Chapter . Conclusion . Notes to the Conclusion . Bibliography . Index . Keine Wahrheit ist also gewisser ... als diese, daß Alles, was für die Erkenntniß da ist, also die ganze Welt, nur Objekt in Beziehung auf das Subjekt ist, Anschauung des Anschauenden, mit Einem Wort, Vorstellung. (Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung) Nichts erschien ..
    [Show full text]