DOCSLIB.ORG

PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 5-6/2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 5-6/2021 POLISH PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 5-6/2021 ISSN 2083-1714 CONTENTS Vaccinations against Covid -19 Declarations show that slightly more than half of adult Poles have already been Vaccinations against vaccinated with at least one dose (52%), almost one-fifth would like to be Covid -19 vaccinated (18%), and one-fourth have no intention to do so (26%). Very few people have no clear attitude Would you like to be vaccinated against t o w a r d s v a c c i n a t i o n ( 4 % ) . COVID-19? Democracy in Poland C o m p a r e d t o t h e M a y % XI 2020 16 20 20 27 17 measurement, the percentage of 1 I 2021 33 23 14 16 13 Energy transformation: people vaccinated with at least one dose has increased significantly, II 2021 3 34 21 15 18 9 expectations and the percentage of those III 2021 7 35 20 14 18 6 and demands declaring their intention to IV 2021 21 27 17 13 17 5 vaccinate has decreased. On the V 2021 36 19 14 11 14 6 Attitude to nuclear other hand, the proportion of people who are reluctant to VI 2021 52 9 9 10 16 4 energy I have already Definitely Rather Rather Definitely Don't vaccinate has remained practically been vaccinated would would not not know unchanged. Almost half of respondents declaring their willingness to vaccinate have not yet IN ADDITION signed up for a specific date (49%). The reasons most often mentioned in TO THE REPORTS REFERRED TO ABOVE, spontaneous statements were lack of time, forgetfulness, "laziness" (21%). A THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED RECENTLY (IN POLISH): history of coronavirus infection was mentioned less often in this context: some argued that they still had to wait after being ill and recover, while others said that · Opinions about TV and Radio Stations they were still immune and could wait with vaccination (18% in total). Some in April respondents (17%) intend to wait until autumn to see how the epidemiological · Influence on Public Affairs situation develops. A similar group of respondents (16%) have not signed up for · Political Party Preferences in May vaccination so far, despite the declared willingness to use this form of · Opinions about Parliament and President immunization, due to fear of potential complications and adverse post- · Fear of Coronavirus and Evaluation vaccination reactions (16%). One-tenth of people willing to vaccinate who have of Government Actions in May not yet signed up for a specific date justify their decision with poor health or · Attitude to COVID-19 Vaccinations in May diseases that preclude vaccination. The same proportion (10%) have not yet · Moods on the Job Market in May signed up for a specific date due to various problems related to the procedure: · Trust in Politicians in May some spoke in this context about difficulties in using a computer (they "cannot · Attitude to Government in May do it"), others lost the appointment due to their inability to come to vaccination on time. A few people have not yet registered for vaccination due to pregnancy, · Social Moods in May breastfeeding (4%) or inability to be vaccinated near their place of residence · Subjective Safety (3%). · Socio-Professional Situation of People Aged 18-24 in the Last 30 Years More information about this topic can be found in CBOS report in Polish: "Poles on COVID-19 · Political Party Preferences in June Vaccinations", June 2021. Fieldwork for national sample: June 2021, N=1218. The random sample is representative for adult population of Poland. · Football and UEFA Euro 2020 · Opinions about Parliament and President Democracy in Poland · Poles on the Announced Changes in Taxes In all subsequent CBOS studies, starting from the first half of the 1990s, Poles · Social Moods in June have invariably declared their approval of democracy, expressing their · Trust in Politicians in June conviction that the democratic system is superior to other forms of government. In April 2021, more than two-thirds of respondents (68%) agreed with the statement that democracy is superior to other systems of condition of Polish democracy has deteriorated exercising power. The percentage of supporters of significantly. People dissatisfied with the way democracy democracy is now slightly lower than it was in 2018-2020, works in our country are in majority (52% dissatisfied, 38% when support for democracy regularly exceeded 70%, satisfied). reaching a record 76% in May 2018. Evaluation of functioning of democracy in Poland Do you agree that democracy is superior to all other forms 80% 70% of government? Dissatisfied 60% 80% Agree 50% 70% 40% 60% Satisfied 30% 50% 20% 40% Don't know 10% 30% Don’t know 0% 20% '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21 10% Disagree Over the last four years, there have been changes in the 0% '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21 assessment of the implementation of certain democratic Since 2016, the level of identification with the democratic principles in our country. This applies primarily to the system has been higher than in previous years (starting principles of liberalism: there is a deterioration in the from 1992): the percentage of people who are not perception of the freedom of expression and association indifferent to whether the government is democratic or in Poland, of the personal freedom of citizens, of the level not systematically exceeds 60%. In April this year, 62% of protection of the rights of minorities, and of citizens' said it mattered to them whether government is opportunity to be active in the public sphere. At the same democratic or not. time, there is an increase in the percentage of people Do you agree that, for people like you, it does not really declaring that in Poland the rights of an individual are matter whether the government is democratic limited in order to achieve collective goals. Other or undemocratic? standards of the democratic state have also deteriorated. 70% Fewer people believe that our country is governed by the 60% Disagree rule of law, that the Sejm represents the will of voters, and 50% that important state decisions are consulted with society. 40% Agree Moreover, there is an increase in the number of citizens 30% questioning freedom and fairness of elections. On the 20% Don't know other hand, there is a noticeable improvement in the 10% components of democracy related to social policy, which 0% '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21 we observed already four years ago: ensuring equal Social consent to undemocratic forms of exercising power opportunities to obtain education, regardless of material is currently the lowest in the history of CBOS research. status, and decent living conditions for the most Only slightly more than one-fourth (26%) agree with the disadvantaged. statement that sometimes undemocratic rule may be Are the following rules observed in Poland? more desirable than democracy. More than half (54%) are % 2017 92 4 4 There is universal suffrage of the opposite opinion. 2021 89 6 6 Do you agree that undemocratic government can There is a choice between 2017 74 15 11 sometimes be better than democratic? political party programs 2021 74 16 11 60% The state finances health, 2017 70 24 6 science and culture 2021 73 21 6 50% Agree Disagree The state is responsible 2017 71 20 9 40% for economic life 2021 69 22 9 30% Don't know 2017 75 14 11 Elections are free and fair 20% 2021 68 21 11 The minority must submit 2017 71 19 10 10% to the will of the majority 2021 68 20 13 0% '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21 Citizens have the opportunity 2017 71 23 6 to be active in public life 2021 62 30 8 In recent years, i.e. from 2018 to July 2020, not only have Personal freedom of citizens 2017 65 25 10 we recorded record-breaking rates of approval for the is protected 2021 57 34 10 democratic order, but also positive assessments of the In order to achieve collective 2017 50 23 27 goals, individual rights functioning of democracy in Poland prevailed at that time. are restricted 2021 55 21 24 In the last few months, however, the assessment of the Yes No Don't know 2 Are the following rules observed in Poland? greatest threats to modern civilization. Only a few % There is freedom of expression 2017 68 26 6 question the threat of climate change (3%) or even deny it and association 2021 54 39 8 (1%). CBOS research from 2009-2018 showed a growing The government cares 2017 48 41 11 awareness of the dangers of climate change. At present, about the welfare of citizens 2021 48 44 7 the perceived importance of this problem has slightly The state ensures decent living 2017 43 47 10 decreased. Perhaps it was due to the ongoing pandemic, conditions for the poorest 2021 48 41 11 which changed the hierarchy of perceived threats to Children from all families have 2017 43 52 5 civilization, bringing to the fore the problems related to it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Security Internal Energy Market Research, Innovation and Competitiveness
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF POLAND’S NATIONAL ENERGY AND CLIMATE PLAN FOR THE YEARS 2021-2030 (NECP PL) 1. OVERVIEW AND THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THE NATIONAL ENERGY AND CLIMATE PLAN 2021-2030 Poland’s National Energy and Climate Plan for years 2021-2030 (NECP PL) along with attachments has been developed in fulfilment of the obligation set out in Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. NECP PL was submitted to the European Commission in connection with Article 3 of the aforementioned Regulation. The final version of the National Plan was prepared taking into account the conclusions derived from inter- ministerial and public consultations, the updates of the national sector development strategies outlined in the Strategy for Responsible Development 2020 (with an outlook to 2030), as well as regional consultations and recommendations of the European Commission C(2019) 4421. The document presents an integrated approach to the implementation of the five dimensions of the Energy Union. The numbering of the chapters (in Polish version NECP) corresponds to scheme from Annex I of the Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. Decarbonisation Energy security Research, innovation and Internal competitiveness energy market 2. OVERVIEW WITH KEY OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND MEASURES OF THE NECP PL Poland’s National Energy and Climate Plan was prepared with a view of establishing a stable framework for a sustainable, economically effective and just transformation in energy sector and the whole economy. This document is intended to enable synergies with the realization of activities in the interconnected five dimensions of the energy union, taking into account the principle of "energy efficiency first".
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Nuclear Energy Development Plan
    5th Workshop on Attaining Carbon Neutrality What does it take to create a carbon neutral energy intensive industry in the UNECE region? 14 April 2021 Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 (EPP2040) Decarbonizing energy intensive industries through nuclear energy in Poland Dr Józef Sobolewski National Centre for Nuclear Research 1 The energy transition will be based on three pillars EEP2040 approved by Polish government February 2nd, 2021 2 Key elements of EPP2040 /1 3 Key elements of EPP2040 /2 4 Polish Nuclear Power Programme Target To build 6-9 GWe of installed nuclear power capacity based on large, proven PWR type reactors for electricity generation. Rationales Updated Energy security: Programme Diversification of fuel base in electricity generation sector. approved by Polish Replacement of old coal-fired power plants with zero-emission dispatchable sources. government Protection of environment and climate: October 2nd, 2020 Significant role of nuclear energy in efforts to prevent climate change. Nuclear energy is a Polish solution to achieve EU climate and energy policy goals. All electricity generation technologies have pros and cons for environment. Energy mix with RES only is unachievable and unrealistic. Mix without NPP means RES and fossils. Economic benefits: Stable price over long period of time Can include district heating and hydrogen production (electrolysis). 5 Key elements of nuclear power implementation. Model (ownership relations): Project company (51% State’s Treasury, 49% Strategic co-investor connected with technology supplier). One technology for all NPP’s. Technology (reason for large PWR’s): The most extensive experience in construction and operation of NPP. No history of important radiological accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Studies of Energy Supply Options in Poland for 1997–2020 Iaea, Vienna, 2002 Iaea-Tecdoc-1304 Isbn 92–0–112602–6 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1304 Comparative studies of energy supply options in Poland for 1997–2020 August 2002 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Planning and Economic Studies Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF ENERGY SUPPLY OPTIONS IN POLAND FOR 1997–2020 IAEA, VIENNA, 2002 IAEA-TECDOC-1304 ISBN 92–0–112602–6 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2002 Printed by the IAEA in Austria August 2002 FOREWORD Poland depends heavily on coal to satisfy national demands for electricity. Currently, over 90% of electricity generation is produced by coal fired power plants. Because of the large dependence on coal and environmental impacts of large-scale coal combustion the country looks for a more diversified energy mix. As ways of diversification, Poland is considering the expanded role of natural gas and, potentially, nuclear power in the future energy mix. This publication describes the analysis of several diversification options for the Polish energy sector conducted by a national team in the framework of an IAEA Technical Co- operation project implemented in 1999–2000. The project provided a set of proven IAEA methodologies and tools that was utilized for a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the options including their economic competitiveness and environmental impacts. The publication is intended primarily for senior experts and technical staff in governmental organizations, research institutes, industries and utilities, who are in charge of technical analysis or decision making related to long term energy and power supply options. The report was prepared in 2001 by the staff of the Energy Market Agency (EMA, Warsaw, Poland) that was the leading Polish organization in carrying out the study.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Polish Nuclear Power Plant Environmental Scoping Report
    The First Polish Nuclear Power Plant Environmental Scoping Report (PGE_SCN_DES_0001_EN_2.0) PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. seated in Warsaw (00-542) ul. Mokotowska 49 Poland September2015 1 Polish Nuclear Power Project Project Information Sheet PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. 2 Polish Nuclear Power Project Project Information Sheet PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. Document information The First Polish Nuclear Power Plant Document: Environmental Scoping Report Number: (PGE_SCN_DES_0001_EN_2.0) Date: 01 09.2015 Author: PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. ul. Mokotowska 49 Contact details: 00-542 Warsaw tel. (0048) 22 340 1053 3 Polish Nuclear Power Project Project Information Sheet PGE EJ 1 sp. z o.o. Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 12 2 Scope and objective of the Environmental Scoping Report .......................................................... 12 3 Justification for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Poland .......................................... 16 4 Type and scope of the project ....................................................................................................... 20 5 Environmental impact assessment procedure .............................................................................. 26 5.1 Legal classification of the project .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Latest Governmental Decision to Launch the Nuclear Power Program
    Hanna Trojanowska1 Miroslaw Duda2 Nuclear power program for Poland : objectives, framework program and basic CHALLENGES 1. Introduction On January 13, 2009, the Council of the Ministers of Poland adopted a resolution on nuclear power development in Poland and commissioning of the first nuclear power plant in in 2020. The decision is in line with the national energy policy until 2030 adopted by the government in 2009 which reflects all challenges which will be faced by Poland when developing its energy sector, particularly ecological requirements imposed within the European Union. The new energy policy formulates ambitious tasks on improvement of energy efficiency of the national economy that will curb the growth of primary energy demand and reduce adverse impact of the energy sector on the environment. It will allow for GDP growth to the year 2030 at an average pace of about 5 % with practically no increase of primary energy demand until 2020, and only modest rise between 2021 and 2030 because of the introduction less efficient but environment friendly technology. The demand of electricity in 2030 is projected at the level of 217 TWh which is higher than in 2007 by only 41 % and sets the average yearly growth at 1,5 % (elasticity factor about 0,3). For the power sector the energy policy sets the following goals: - assuring long-term security of electricity supply, - maintaining electricity prices at levels acceptable by the national economy and the society; - reducing emission of SO2, NOx, and CO2 and increasing the share of RES in the final energy mix to levels defined by EU requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • To Whom Should We Grant a Power Plant? Economic Effects Of
    energies Article To Whom Should We Grant a Power Plant? Economic Effects of Investment in Nuclear Energy in Poland Katarzyna Zawali ´nska 1,*, Jouko Kinnunen 2, Piotr Gradziuk 1 and Dorota Celi ´nska-Janowicz 3 1 Institute of Agricultural and Rural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), ul. Nowy Swiat´ 72, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Statistics and Research Åland (ÅSUB), Ålandsvägen 26, AX-22100 Mariehamn, Åland, Finland; [email protected] 3 Centre for European Regional and Local Studies (EUROREG), University of Warsaw, ul. Krakowskie Przedmie´scie30, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 May 2020; Accepted: 21 May 2020; Published: 26 May 2020 Abstract: Poland is the most coal-dependent economy and one of the biggest polluters in the EU. In order to alleviate this problem, meet CO2 emission requirements set by EU, and improve the country’s energy security, Poland decided to introduce nuclear power to its energy mix. So far, several potential locations for nuclear power plants have been officially proposed, mainly based on technical parameters, but no comparisons of the economic impact of such locations have been considered. Consequently, the main goal of this paper is to compare the national and regional economic effects of investments in nuclear power plants—for both the construction and exploitation phases—in the four most probable locations, which are similarly beneficial from a technical point of view. In order to simulate these effects, the spatial recursive dynamic Computable General Equilibrium model was calibrated until 2050 including agglomeration effects and featuring the regional economies of all Polish regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power on the Vistula River Law and Policy in Shaping Energy Future of Poland
    Tomasz R. Nowacki Nuclear Power on the Vistula River Law and Policy in Shaping Energy Future of Poland The author attempts to present coupling of policy and law in the energy sector using the example of nuclear power introduction in Poland. In particular, he highlights the most important aspect of this combination i.e. how legal instruments, including legislative ones, are used to achieve the strategic goals of state policy. Tomasz R. Nowacki 1. Introduction Energy policy is not just PhD of Juridical Science energy. Its implications extend in Akademia Pomorska w Słupsku principle to all areas of the state’s functioning, with particular regard ORCID – 0000-0002-6684-8384 to the economy as a whole and to Key words: social and political issues, including nuclear law and policy, Atomic Law, nuc- foreign policy. And so is the imple- lear safety, social acceptance for nuclear mentation of nuclear power seen power by decision-makers in Poland – in a multi-faceted manner, where di- https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi32.97 rect energy benefits are only one of many. The implementation of nucle- ar power is both a goal and a means to achieve other strategic goals such as energy security, economic deve- lopment, public health, foreign po- licy aspects. These policy goals can be achieved using nuclear power, but the construction of nuclear po- wer plants will not be possible wit- hout achieving the intermediate po- licy goals: gaining and keeping pub- lic acceptance, reducing investment risks, and ensuring state control over 182 Prawo i Więź nr 3 (33) jesień 2020 Tomasz R.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment Report for the Polish Nuclear Programme
    1 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY AUTHORS: Łukasz Szkudlarek, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Marek Kasprzak TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 About the Report .................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 References to other strategic documents .............................................................................. 1-6 1.4 Current state of the natural environment in Poland .............................................................. 1-6 1.5 No-action alternative – impact on the natural environment in Poland ............................... 1-14 1.6 Nuclear energy – background information ......................................................................... 1-15 1.7 Analysis and evaluation of the impact of radioactive emissions from nuclear power plants .................................................................................................................................. 1-23 1.8 Analysis and evaluation of other expected significant impacts related to the operation of nuclear power plants ...................................................................................... 1-31 1.9 Identification and description of the expected environmental impacts of the Programme ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources in Poland As a Part of Commitment to the Polish and EU Energy Policy
    energies Article Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources in Poland as a Part of Commitment to the Polish and EU Energy Policy Józef Paska 1,*, Tomasz Surma 2, Paweł Terlikowski 1 and Krzysztof Zagrajek 1 1 Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Str. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (P.T.); [email protected] (K.Z.) 2 CEZ Polska, Al. Jerozolimskie 63, 00-697 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 June 2020; Accepted: 14 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present the state of development of renewable energy sources (RES) in Poland in accordance with the obligations of European Union energy policy. The EU Member States are obliged to adopt different support mechanisms for the development of renewable energy sources, and in consequence to achieve their Directive’s targets. Poland, being a Member State of the EU since 2004, has accepted a target of a 15% share of energy generated from renewable energy sources in final energy consumption, including 19.3% from renewable electricity until 2020. Due to the difficulties with target achievement, the authors found it reasonable to analyze the challenge of RES development in Poland. The article presents energy policy in the EU, as well as the review of measures implemented for renewable energy development. The current state of and perspectives on using renewable energy sources in Poland and in the EU are also depicted. In the article, the authors analyze the relation between reference prices at dedicated RES auctions in Poland and the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE).
    [Show full text]
  • Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (1)
    DIALOG FORUM ON DRIVERS AND IMPEDIMENTS FOR REGIONAL COOPERATION ON THE WAY TO SUSTAINABLE NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS LITHUANIAN NPP PROGRAM: NUCLEAR OPTION IS IMPORTANT AND ATTRACTIVE VACLOVAS MISKINIS, LITHUANIAN ENERGY INSTITUTE VIENNA, 30 JULY-3 AUGUST 2012 Presentation plan Introduction; Current status and prospects of a nuclear power programme in Lithuania; Driving forces and impediments for embarking nuclear programme; Expected role of Lithuanian nuclear system in 2030 and 2050; Role of Lithuania in deployment of nuclear energy; Vision of back-end fuel cycle services for the national nuclear power programme; Presentation plan Concept of sustainable nuclear energy system; Vision of ”Energy independence” and ”Security of supply”; Experience and plans for cooperation with other countries in energy projects; Possible drivers and impediments for cooperation with other countries in nuclear projects; Benefits and disadvantages of cooperation with other countries in nuclear energy projects. Lithuania LITHUANIA . Area: 65.200 km² Population: 3.2 mln. GDP: fast growth in 2000-2008 by Latvia 7.4%, reduction in 2009 by 14.8%; growth in 2010: 1.4% Lithuania in 2011: 5.9% Russia (Kaliningrad region) GDP in 2011: US$ 13259 per Poland capita Belarus Presentation plan Introduction; Current status and prospects of a nuclear power programme in Lithuania; Driving forces and impediments for embarking nuclear programme; Expected role of Lithuanian nuclear system in 2030 and 2050; Role of Lithuania in deployment of nuclear energy; Vision of back-end fuel cycle services for the national nuclear power programme; Role of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (1) Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant - a twin-unit plant with two RBMK-1500 reactors; one was kept in operation over the period 1983-2004, another – in 1987-2009; In 1990 Lithuania declared its independence and Ignalina NPP with two largest in the world RBMK-1500 reactors came under authority of the Lithuania Republic since 1991; Lithuania was the 31st country in the world using nuclear energy for generation of electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy of the Future? Nuclear Energy in Central and Eastern Europe
    Energy of the Future? Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern Europe Editors: Karel Polanecký, Jan Haverkamp HEINRICH-BÖLL-STIFTUNG Energy of the Future? Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern Europe Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Energy of the Future? Energy Editors: Karel Polanecký, Jan Haverkamp Concept and Project Coordination: Eva van de Rakt, Erik Siegl English translation: Petra and Evan Mellander Photographs: Jan Haverkamp and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Typesetting: Tomáš Barčík Printing: H.R.G. spol. s r.o., Svitavská 120 , 570 01 Litomyšl Published by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Praha in February 2011 ISBN 978-80-254-8928-4 Energy of the Future? Energy 4 CONTENTS Preface 6 Summary 7 Part I: Political Support for Nuclear Energy 9 • Czech Republic – ČEZ, Nuclear Power and Political Elites (Karel Polanecký) 9 • Slovakia – Political Pressure to Develop Nuclear Energy (Pavol Široký) 14 • Poland – Nuclear Plans (Zbigniew M. Karaczun) 20 • Hungary – Traces of the Soviet Nuclear Industry (András Perger) 24 • Bulgaria – Energy Policy and Politics (Petko Kovachev, Jan Haverkamp) 28 Part II: Financing the Construction of Nuclear Reactors and Forms of State Support 37 Part III: Basic Data on the Significance of Nuclear Energy in Five States in the Region 47 About the Authors 54 Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Energy of the Future? Energy 5 PREFACE Looking at International Atomic Energy Agency statistics, it is not immediately evident that the coun- tries of Central and Eastern Europe would constitute a promised land for nuclear energy. In the Euro- pean states of the former Eastern Bloc only two reactors are actually being built – in Mochovce, Slo- vakia.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Summary of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Results and Justification for the Selection of the Polish Nuclear Power Programme
    Written summary of the strategic environmental assessment results and justification for the selection of the Polish Nuclear Power Programme WRITTEN SUMMARY OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SELECTION OF THE POLISH NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME 2 Written summary of the strategic environmental assessment results and justification for the selection of the Polish Nuclear Power Programme INDEX OF ACRONYMS...................................................................................................................... 5 1. SUMMARY OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................…..……6 2. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE PROGRAMME IN THE CONTEXT OF THE MOST IMPORTANT COMMENTS, CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS STEMMING FROM THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................... 10 2.1. OBJECTIONS AND CONCERNS OF A PART OF THE POLISH SOCIETY ABOUT THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER IN POLAND ......................................................................................................... 11 2.2. COMMENTS ON THE OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROJECT..................................................12 2.3. ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND RESULTS OF THE ANALYSES OF THE ELECTRICITY GENERATION SUBSECTOR, CONTAINED IN THE PROGRAMME AND THE FORECAST ................................................. 17 2.4. ALTERNATIVES FOR PNPP
    [Show full text]