DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly Hansard 1959

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 1959 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 1288 City of Rockhampton, &c., Bill [ASSEMBLY] Questions THURSDAY, 12 NOVEMBER, 1959 Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. A. R. Fletcher, Cunningham) took the chair at 11 a.m. QUESTIONS SUPPLY OF DOG-SPIKES TO RAILWAY DEPARTMENT Mr. MANN (Brisbane) asked the Minister for Transport- "(1) In connection with the contract for the supply of dog-spikes by McPhersons Ltd. at £59,818 15s. Od. to the Railway Department, what was the price tendered by the Queensland manufacturer?" "(2) What was the difference in price between McPhersons Ltd. and the Queensland tenderer?" Hon. G. W. W. CHALK (Lockyer) replied- "(1) £63,625." "(2) £3,806 Ss." "After deduction of the value of the steel content involved from each tender­ such steel not being of Queensland origin­ the Queensland manufacturers' price on which they were entitled to preference for Queensland manufacture was approxi­ mately 12 per cent. in excess of that of the lowest tenderer." SUPPLY OF OFFAL MEATS, TOWNSVILLE Mr. AIKENS (Mundingburra) asked the Minister for Agriculture and Stock- "As the supply of brains, tails, kidneys, tongues and other offal meats from the Townsville abattoir is insufficient to meet public demand, is it permissible for people to arrange for these and meat cuts in short supply to be purchased from meatworks? If not, why not?" Hon. 0. 0. MADSEN (Warwick) replied- "Tt is known that the Townsville District Abattoir Board is at times unable to meet the full demand for the supply of brains, tails, kidneys, tongues and other offal meats in the Townsville district abattoir area. Under these circumstances, permission is given for fixed quantities of such offal meats to be supplied to butchers from other sources as is done at times in other abattoir areas. The district abattoir is able to kill sufficient animals to supply all carcass and meat cuts and as is the case in other district abattoir areas, these classes of meat must be obtained from the district abat­ toir." City of Rockhampton [12 NovEMBER] (Lands PU1·chase) Bill 1289 RAILWAY FREIGHT CONCESSIONS TO of the Chamber were brainless because they BREWERIES continued to question him on the subject of the Bill. Mr. ADAffi (Cook) asked the Minister for He explained that the land is held by the Transport- City of Rockhampton under deed of grant "(1) Will he advise what rail freight as trustee for the Government, and I was concessions are being granted to breweries just wondering whether in the Minister's in Southern Queensland?" view all similar trusts are of no concern of "(2) Does he agree that the Cairns hon. members or of the people of Queens­ brewery should also receive the same con­ land. The Minister should recognise fully cession? If not, why not?" the responsibilities of Parliament and of hon. members of Parliament to the people who Hon. G. W. W. CHALK (Lockyer) return them. The land is not owned by the replied- City of Rockhampton, nor it is owned on "(! and 2) No good purpose would be behalf of the people of Rockhampton. It is served by the preparation of the infor­ owned by the people of Queensland, and held mation sought in Question 1 as transport in trust by the City of Rockhampton. There­ conditions operating in Southern Queens­ fore the subject is of vital interest to Par­ land are not comparable with those existing liament. It is certainly the business of Par­ in Cairns. The Cairns Brewery does not liament to find out what is to happen to the market beer south of Rockhampton and the land, and how the trust has been administered. special rates applicable to the railage of We do not agree that the method proposed beer from Cairns to the principal centres in by the Bill is the only one to be adopted. If which Cairns beer is marketed as compared the administration of the trust has failed in with the special rates from Brisbane the past, and we are now called upon to Breweries to the same markets do not, as assist the trustees, we have every right to shown hereunder, place the Cairns Brewery examine the Government's proposals. There at a disadvantage. are other ways in which the matter could have been tackled, with benefit to the City (A) Bulk Beer of Rockhampton. If the position of the Rate ex Cairns Rate ex Brisbane trustees has become impossible because of To Per Ton Per Ton 8. d. 8. d. the demands of the State Licensing Com­ Townsville 180 0 mission, we are entitled to inquire about the Bowen 242 0 Government's reaction to a request for finan­ Proserpine 263 0 Mackay .. 178 3 180 6 cial assistance or a Government guarantee (B) Bottled Beer for a loan from banking institutions. Ingham 143 6 The Minister has not given us any infor­ Townsville 143 6 308 0 Bowen 161 6 mation on that point. We cannot agree to Mackay 178 3 291 6 the alienation of land from the people of Rockhampto~ · 209 0 209 0 Queensland or from the City of Rockhamp­ ton. It is all very well to say that the Rockhampton City Council will get some PAPERS immediate gain, that its expenditure will be reduced in that it will no longer be saddled The following paper was laid on the table, with the cost of improving these properties. and ordered to be printed- But we have to look at the ultimate result. Report of the Burdekin River Authority The proposition would be much better for for the year 1958-1959. the council if the Government were to guar­ antee a loan to it sufficient to cover the cost The following paper was laid on the table­ of improvements. Regulation under the Abattoirs Acts, 1930 I ascertained as a result of a visit to to 1958. South Australia that there are many local authorities in that State who control their own hotels. Legislation has been passed by CITY OF ROCKHAMPTON (LANDS an anti-Labour Government protecting the PURCHASE) BILL licensees from competition by other licensees SECOND READING-RESUMPTION OF DEBATE against the municipal-owned hotels. The hon. member for Mundingburra stated what Debate resumed from 11 November (see had taken place at Townsville, and in South p. 1288) on Mr. Muller's motion- Australia the revenue received had been "That the Bill be now read a second the means of providing kindergartens, time." hostels, schools and other amenities for the people. If the trust in Rockhamp­ Mr. LLOYD (Kedron) (11.12 a.m.): ton has not been attending to its Throughout the debate the Minister has said responsibilities correctly it is the duty that this matter has nothing at all to do of the Government to ensure that the interests with hon. members, that it is simply one of the people are protected. The trust should for the local authority, the Rockhampton be told to administer its responsibilities cor­ City Council. On one or two occasions he rectly. The Rockhampton City Council said that several hon. members on this side should have examined the trentals being 1290 City of Rockhampton [ASSEM:BLY] (Lands Purchase) Bill received for the properties in question. It Rockhampton area. I fail to see why the is our business as members of this Parliament document should be regarded as confidential. to discuss these matters. We criticise the The people of Rockhampton have a right administration of the council. It is all very to know what rentals are being paid. well for the Mayor of Rockhampton to thank the Government for doing something Mr. Gardner: Do you think the document immediately for the people of his city. If should be made public before the negotia­ correct rentals had been chargeg the receipts tions on rentals are completed? over many years would give a greater bene­ Mr. LLOYD: I admit that it is a matter of fit to the people. At present the city is great importance to the Rockhampton City only receiving an immediate benefit. An Council, but it is equally important to the examination of the Tentals being charged Tatepayers of Rockhampton. The trustees shows them to be ridiculously low when are collecting weekly rentals of £230, some­ compared with the unimproved value of the where in the vicinity of £14,000 or £15,000 land, for it has to be borne in mind that a year. The submission has been made that there are some valuable buildings on the the rentals are not sufficient to cover the land. cost of maintenance. That is difficult to Mr. Walsh: To which particular rentals understand. I should like to know whether are you referring? the trustees are spending £15,000 a -year on maintenance. Mr. LLOYD: The hon. member for Rock­ As I say, the present rentals seem to be hampton informed us that £31,000 was spent ridiculously low. If a lease goes back over on improvements to the Crown Hotel. We a period of 20 years a low rental might be find that the rental received by the trust is understandable. In one case, however, the £20 a week, a ridiculously low sum for the lease does not expire until 1970, which buildings on the land. means that it was entered into in 1950, only Mr. Gardner: That is £1,000 a year, plus 9 years ago. I am referring now to another £20 a week. Rickart's building, with an unimproved value of £12,765. The valuation of that property Mr. LLOYD: Even so, the rental is still must have increased considerably during the low when you consider that £31,000 has past nine years, and I cannot understand been spent on maintenance and reconstruc­ why the Tmst should not have benefited by tion.
Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Aquaculture and Amendments to the Fisheries Act Under the Primary Industries and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2003 (Qld)

    Prospects for Aquaculture and Amendments to the Fisheries Act Under the Primary Industries and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2003 (Qld)

    Queensland Parliamentary Library Prospects for Aquaculture and amendments to the Fisheries Act under the Primary Industries and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2003 (Qld) At least two recent developments have put the spotlight on aquaculture in Queensland. The first is the proposal for the development of a fish farm in Moreton Bay. Secondly, there has been an escalation in regulatory controls on recreational and commercial wild fish catches to guard against overexploitation. Aquaculture is a developing and promising Queensland industry that may have the potential to fill the gap between the public’s demand for fish and shellfish and the emerging shortage in wild fish supplies. However, there are a number of factors that impact upon the development of the aquaculture industry with environmental impacts of projects being a primary issue for producers. A number of regulatory controls on aquaculture developments are aimed at minimising environmental harm, including a development assessment process under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld). In recognition of the problems created for producers by duplication of planning and assessment processes, the Primary Industries and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2003 (Qld) has been introduced to amend the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld) to require that certain fisheries development proposals are assessed under the Integrated Planning Act 1997. Wayne Jarred Research Brief No 2003/26 Queensland Parliamentary Library Research Publications and Resources Section Ms Karen Sampford, Director (07) 3406 7116 Ms Nicolee Dixon, Senior Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7409 © Queensland Parliamentary Library, 2003 ISSN 1443-7902 ISBN 0 7345 2873 6 SEPTEMBER 2003 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited, other than by Members of the Queensland Parliament in the course of their official duties, without the prior written permission of the Clerk of the Parliament on behalf of the Parliament of Queensland.
  • Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) Has Been Prepared to Ensure There Is a Consistant Approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire

    Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) Has Been Prepared to Ensure There Is a Consistant Approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire

    F Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 FOREWORD Foreword by the Chair, Andrew Ireland of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group. The Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared to ensure there is a consistant approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire. This plan is an important tool for managing potential disasters and is a demonstrated commitment towards enhancing the safety of the Livingstone Shire community. The plan identifies potential hazards and risks in the area, identifies steps to mitigate these risks and includes strategies to enact should a hazard impact and cause a disaster. This plan has been developed to be consistant with the Disaster Management Standards and Guidelines and importantly to intergrate into the Queensland Disaster Management Arrangements (QDMA). The primary focus is to help reduce the potential adverse effect of an event by conducting activities before, during or after to help reduce loss of human life, illness or injury to humans, property loss or damage, or damage to the environment. I am confident the LDMP provides a comprehensive framework for our community, and all residents and vistors to our region can feel secure that all agenices involved in the Livingstone Shire LDMP are dedicated and capable with a shared responsibility in disaster management. On behalf of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group, I would like to thank you for taking the time to read this important plan. Livingstone Shire Council Mayor Andrew Ireland Chair, Local Disaster Management Group Dated: 26 August 2020 Page 2 of 175 ECM # xxxxxx Version 6 Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 ENDORSEMENT This Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared by the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group for the Livingstone Shire Council as required under section 57 of the Disaster Management Act 2003 (the Act).
  • 277995 VACGAZ 14 Nov 03

    277995 VACGAZ 14 Nov 03

    Queensland Government Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. CCCXXXIV] FRIDAY, 14 NOVEMBER, 2003 belong in a new car? Key features: Fast approvals New vehicle or demo with 20% deposit (usually in 24 hours) p.a.* No on-going fees on 7.20% loan account Early payout option Comparison rate Loan pre-approval 1 Pay-by-the-month p.a.* insurance 7.45% Competitive rates CUAGA1003 Ask at your local CUA branch for more information. Or call CUA Direct on (07) 3365 0055. 1Comparison Rate calculated on a loan amount of $30,000 over a term of 5 years based on fortnightly repayments. These rates are for secured loans only. WARNING: This comparison rate applies only to the example or examples given. Different amounts and terms will result in different comparison rates. Costs such as redraw fees or early repayment fees, and cost savings such as fee waivers, are not included in the comparison rate but may influence the cost of the loan. Comparison Rate Schedules are available at all CUA branches, linked credit providers and on our website at www.cua.com.au. * Loans are subject to normal CUA lending criteria. Fees and charges apply. Full terms and conditions are available on application. www.cua.com.au [767] Queensland Government Gazette EXTRAORDINARY PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. CCCXXXIV] MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER, 2003 [No. 50 Queensland NOTIFICATION OF SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION Statutory Instruments Act 1992 Notice is given of the making of the subordinate legislation mentioned in Table 1 TABLE 1 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION BY NUMBER No.
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1960

    Legislative Assembly Hansard 1960

    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 1960 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 1344 Auctioneers, Real Estate, &c., Bill [ASSEMBLY] Questions THURSDAY, 10 NOVEMBER, 1960 Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, Murrumba) took the chair at 11 a.m. QUESTIONS INCREASES IN BRISBANE MEAT PRICES Mr. LLOYD (Kedron) asked the Minister for Agriculture and Forestry- "(!) Has his attention been drawn to what is apparently a deliberately misleading opinion in the 'Telegraph' of Tuesday, November 8, which attempts to place the responsibility for the seven pence increase in meat prices in Brisbane on the control over the supply of meat in the metropolitan area by the Brisbane Abattoir?" "(2) Is it not a fact that the Cannon Hill Saleyards are merely a facility placed at the disposal of the buyers and sellers of cattle and the Queensland Meat Industry Board has nothing to do with the prices paid for the cattle sold at the Saleyards?" "(3) Would it not be true to state that the only affect that the operations of the Brisbane Abattoir have on the price of meat to the Brisbane housewife is the charge per head imposed on the slaugh­ tering of cattle owned by meat companies and individual buyers?" "(4) For the correct information of the Brisbane public, will he outline the charges made for the slaughtering of cattle at the Brisbane Abattoir?" "(5) How do these charges compare with those imposed by other abattoirs?" Questions [10 NOVEMBER] Questions 1345 "(6) Has there been any recent increase Cannon Hill have had no influence on in the slaughtering charges levied at the recent rises in meat prices.
  • Council Meeting Notice & Agenda 15

    Council Meeting Notice & Agenda 15

    COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA 15 December 2020 49 Stockyard Street Cunnamulla Qld 4490 www.paroo.qld.gov.au Agenda General Meeting of Council Notice is hereby given that the Ordinary Meeting of Council is to be held on Tuesday, 15th December 2020 at the Cunnamulla Shire Hall, Jane Street Cunnamulla, commencing at 9.00am 1 OPENING OF MEETING 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS 3 ATTENDANCES AND APOLOGIES 4 MOTION OF SYMPATHY • Mr Peter Doyle • Ms Grace Brown • Pat Cooney 5 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Recommendation: That Council adopt the minutes of the General Meeting of Council held Tuesday, 17th November 2020 as a true and correct record of that meeting. 6 DECLARATION OF INTEREST BEING 6.1 Material Personal Interest 6.2 Conflict Of Interest 7 MAYOR 1 7.1 Mayor’s Report 8 OFFICER REPORTS 8.1 DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE 8.1.1 Operations Report 3 8.1.2 Rubbish Truck Replacement Report 12 8.2 DIRECTOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT AND ENGAGEMENT 8.2.1 Community Services Report 15 8.2.2 Library Services Report 20 8.2.3 Tourism Report 23 8.2.4 Local Laws Report 29 8.2.5 Rural Lands and Compliance Report 32 8.2.6 Community Support – Strides Blue Tree 34 10.30 First 5 Forever Video Competition Winners announced – Winners to attend to receive awards Morning Tea 8.3 CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER 8.3.1 Finance Report 36 8.4 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 8.4.1 Action Item Register 52 8.4.2 Office of the Chief Executive Officer’s Report 57 8.4.3 Grants Report 63 8.4.4 Project Management Report 66 8.4.5 Policy Report 69 9 LATE REPORTS 10 CLOSED SESSION - CONFIDENTIAL 11 CORRESPONDENCE 11.1 Special Gazetted Public Holiday 132 11.2 2021 QOGM Paroo 141 11.3 MDA Change of Name Consultation 143 12 CLOSURE OF MEETING 155 Ms Cassie White Chief Executive Officer 09th December 2020 General Council Meeting Notice & Agenda 15 December 2020 7.1 Mayor’s Report Council Meeting: 15 December 2020 Department: Office of the Mayor Author: Suzette Beresford, Mayor Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the meetings and teleconferences that Mayor Beresford has attended.
  • Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Draft Environmental Impact

    Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Draft Environmental Impact

    Appendix R Social impact assessment report Gladstone Area Water Board and SunWater Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Social Impact Assessment Report September 2014 Executive summary Project background The Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project (Project) is the construction and operation of a raised Eden Bann Weir and construction and operation of Rookwood Weir on the Fitzroy River, Central Queensland to facilitate capture and storage of all high priority unallocated water (nominally 76,000 ML/a) in the Fitzroy system. The development of weir infrastructure (and associated works), the resultant storage of water (inundation of the river bed and banks) and the transfer of water between storages through ‘run of river’ methods on the Fitzroy River comprise the scope of the Project. Eden Bann Weir is an existing structure located at AMTD 141.2 km on the Fitzroy River, approximately 80 km upstream of Rockhampton. The current weir has a Full Supply Level (FSL) of 14.5 m (Stage 1). The Project proposes to raise the weir to a FSL of 18.2 m (Stage 2), with a subsequent addition of gates (Stage 3) which would raise the structure to FSL 20.2 m. The Rookwood Weir site is located at AMTD 265.3 km on the Fitzroy River, approximately 85 km south-west of Rockhampton. The Project proposes to construct a weir to a FSL 47 m (Stage 1). Addition of gates (Stage 2) would raise the structure to FSL 49.0 m. The order in which the proposed infrastructure would be developed is dependent on the demand and the consequent storage capacity and yield resulting from a particular build / stage.
  • 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022

    2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022

    DRAFT V20 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022 Working to recover, rebuild and reconnect more resilient Queensland communities following the 2019 Queensland Bushfires August 2020 to come Document details Interpreter Security classification Public The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have Date of review of security classification August 2020 difficulty in understanding this report, you can access the Translating and Interpreting Authority Queensland Reconstruction Authority Services via www.qld.gov.au/languages or by phoning 13 14 50. Document status Final Disclaimer Version 1.0 While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no QRA reference QRATF/20/4207 responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. ISSN 978-0-9873118-4-9 To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Copyright Copies This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority), August 2020. Copies of this publication are available on our website at: https://www.qra.qld.gov.au/fitzroy Further copies are available upon request to: Licence Queensland Reconstruction Authority This work is licensed by State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority) under a Creative PO Box 15428 Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International licence. City East QLD 4002 To view a copy of this licence, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Phone (07) 3008 7200 In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute [email protected] the work to the State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority).
  • The Poultry Industry Regulations of 1946 Queensland Reprint

    The Poultry Industry Regulations of 1946 Queensland Reprint

    Warning “Queensland Statute Reprints” QUT Digital Collections This copy is not an authorised reprint within the meaning of the Reprints Act 1992 (Qld). This digitized copy of a Queensland legislation pamphlet reprint is made available for non-commercial educational and research purposes only. It may not be reproduced for commercial gain. ©State of Queensland "THE POULTRY INDUSTRY REGULATIONS OF 1946" Inserted by regulations published Gazette 3 March 1947, p. 761; and amended by regulations published Gazette 13 November 1968, p. 2686; 23 July, 1949, p. 224; 25 March 1950, p. 1166; 20 January 1951, p. 162; 9 June 1951, p. 686; 8 November 1952, p. 1136; 16 May 1953, p. 413; 2 July 1955, p. 1118; 3 March 1956, p. 633; 5 April 1958, p. 1543; 14 June 1958, p. 1488, 13 December 1958, p. 1923; 25 April 1959, p. 2357; 10 October 1959, p. 896; 12 December 1959, p. 2180; 12 March 1960, pp. 1327-30; 2 April 1960, p. 1601; 22 April1961, p. 22.53; 11 August 1962, p. 1785; 23 November 1963, p. 1011; 22 February 1964, p. 710; 7 March 1964, p. 865; 16 January 1965, p. 117; 3 July 1965, p. 1323; 12 February 1966, p. 1175; 26 February 1966, p. 1365; 16 April 1966, p. 1983; 7 May 1966, pp. 160-1; 9 July 1966, p. 1352; 27 August 1966, p. 2022. Department of Agriculture and Stock, Brisbane, 27th February, 1947. HIS Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has, in pursuance of the provisions of "The Poultry Industry Act of 1946," been pleased to make the following Regulations:- 1.
  • Type Specimens of Birds in the American Museum of Natural History

    Type Specimens of Birds in the American Museum of Natural History

    L Scientific Publications of the American Museum of Natural History e Croy American Museum Novitates TyPe SPeCIMeNS oF BIrDS IN THe Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History : Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History T AMERICAN MUSeUM oF NATUrAL HISTORY y P Publications Committee e SP PArT 8. PASSERIFORMeS: Robert S. Voss, Chair e Board of Editors CIM PACHyCePHALIDAe, AeGITHALIDAe, reMIZIDAe, Jin Meng, Paleontology e Lorenzo Prendini, Invertebrate Zoology NS PArIDAe, SITTIDAe, NEOSITTIDAe, CERTHIIDAe, Robert S. Voss, Vertebrate Zoology o rHABDORNITHIDAe, CLIMACTERIDAe, DICAeIDAe, Peter M. Whiteley, Anthropology F BI PArDALoTIDAe, AND NeCTArINIIDAe Managing Editor r DS: DS: Mary Knight 8. PAS M Ary L eCroy Submission procedures can be found at http://research.amnh.org/scipubs S ER Complete lists of all issues of Novitates and Bulletin are available on the web (http:// IF digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace). Inquire about ordering printed copies via e-mail from OR [email protected] or via standard mail from: M e American Museum of Natural History—Scientific Publications, S Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper). AMNH BULL On the cover: The type specimen of Pachycephala nudigula Hartert, 1897, shown here in a lithograph by J.G. e TIN 333 Keulemans (Novitates Zoologicae, 1897, 4: pl. 3, fig.3), was collected by Alfred Everett on Flores Island, Indonesia, in October 1896. The bare, deep red throat, unique in the genus, occurs only in the adult male and is inflated when he sings.
  • Part 3. Strategic Framework 3.1

    Part 3. Strategic Framework 3.1

    LIVINGSTONE PLANNING SCHEME 2018 Part 3. Strategic framework 3.1. Preliminary (1) The strategic framework sets the policy direction for the planning scheme and forms the basis for ensuring appropriate development occurs within the planning scheme area for the life of the planning scheme. (2) Mapping for the strategic framework is included in Schedule 2. (3) For the purpose of describing the policy direction for the planning scheme, the strategic framework is structured in the following way: (a) the strategic intent, and statements of preferred dominant land uses in the form of describing the places that form part of the planning scheme area; (b) the following six (6) themes that collectively represent the policy intent of the planning scheme: (i) Settlement pattern; (ii) Natural environment and hazards; (iii) Community identity and diversity; (iv) Access and mobility; (v) Infrastructure and services; and (vi) Natural resources and economic development; (c) the strategic outcomes proposed for development in the planning scheme area for each theme; (d) the specific outcomes for each, or a number of, elements of each theme; and (e) the land use strategies for achieving these outcomes. (4) Although each theme has its own section, the strategic framework is read in its entirety as the policy intent for the planning scheme. Editor’s note: The planning scheme has adopted a twenty-five (25) year planning horizon. However, the planning scheme itself (as a statutory document) is likely to have an operational life of up to ten (10) years before it is substantively reviewed. 3.2. Strategic intent The Livingstone Shire Council planning scheme area is situated in the Central Queensland Region on the Tropic of Capricorn.
  • Queensland Government Gazette

    Queensland Government Gazette

    Queensland Government Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. CCCXXXIV] FRIDAY, 19 DECEMBER, 2003 9 [1213] Queensland Government Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. CCCXXXIV] FRIDAY, 19 DECEMBER, 2003 [No. 76 Acquisition of Land Act 1967 Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 TAKING OF LAND NOTICE (No. 769) 2003 Short title 1. This notice may be cited as the Taking of Land Notice (No. 769) 2003. Land to be taken [s.15(6A) of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967] 2. Following agreement in writing, the land described in the Schedule is taken for the purpose of transport, in particular, road purposes as from 19 December 2003 and vests in the Chief Executive, Department of Main Roads, as constructing authority for the State of Queensland, for an estate in fee simple. SCHEDULE Land Taken County of Elphinstone, Parish of Stuart - an area of about 3489 square metres being part of Lot 1 on RP736668 contained in Title Reference: 21156160. As shown approximately on Plan R9-362(B) held in the office of the Chief Executive, Department of Main Roads, Brisbane. Townsville City Flinders Highway (Stuart Bypass) 510/1161; 2835 ENDNOTES 1. Made by the Governor in Council on 18 December 2003. 2. Published in the Gazette on 19 December 2003. 3. Not required to be laid before the Legislative Assembly. 4. The administering agency is the Department of Main Roads. 279237—1 1214 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, No. 76 [19 December, 2003 Acquisition of Land Act 1967 Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 TAKING OF LAND NOTICE (No.
  • Bob Richardson 97 Pages

    Bob Richardson 97 Pages

    Comment on suggestion 8 Bob Richardson 97 pages Queensland secretariat Phone 07 3834 3458 Fax 07 3834 3496 Email FedRedistr [email protected] 2 A mistake has occurred when transferring the figures on Page one of Kennedy:- The correct figures should have been:- To the Suggested Division of Riordan SA2 Far Central West: - 6/01/2017= 263 27/09/2021 + 298 SA2 Townsville South: - 6/01/2017 = 1,224 27/09/2021= 1,282 The area should have been 503,472 sq km. Should you have any queries please contact me on the above phone number. Yours sincerely R. J. Richardson 3 SUBMISSION TO THE FEDERAL REDISTRIBUTION OF ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES IN QUEENSLAND BY BOB RICHARDSON COMMENTS ON SUGGESTIONS General:- • All of the ‘suggestions’ except mine left the existing 30 Divisions with the same names. • Most made only minor changes, especially in regional and rural areas. • While giving ‘lip service’ to the need to follow Local Government boundaries, as a means of ‘Community interest’ most did not address the problems of splitting cities, such as Mackay, Rockhampton, and the Fraser Coast. I believe that this, without having fit another Division in, is the opportunity for the Redistribution Committee to bring Divisions like Dawson back to where they traditionally belong. 4 DIVISION OF LEICHHARDT In my ‘suggestions’ I discussed the disadvantage to the residents on Cape York Peninsula (referred to hereupon throughout this submission as ‘the Cape’) and the Torres Strait Islands (referred to throughout this submission as ‘the Islands’), however I did not mention a matter closer to Cairns, the population growth of the Cairns area, from Palm Cave to Gordonvale.