Evolution of Primitive Land Plants: a Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 36(1), pp. 1–11, February 22, 2010 Evolution of Primitive Land Plants: A Review Masahiro Kato Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4–1–1, Tsukuba, 305–0005 Japan E-mail: [email protected] (Received 10 December 2009; accepted 18 December 2009) Abstract Our understanding of the evolution of primitive land plants is overviewed. Molecular phylogenetic data suggest that the suggested ancestor of the land plants is Charophyceae, although other ancestry is suggested based on different lines of evidence. Invasion to land environment dur- ing the mid-Ordovician or earlier should have been made possible by chemical compounds, ozone, flavonoid, cutin, sporopollenin, and lignin, against UV irradiation, drought and gravity. Recent molecular analyses with large data sets and fossil data provide robust evidence on land plant evolu- tion and phylogeny, but the deep relationship of land plants is still unclear. It is likely that the earli- est land plants are liverwort-like, and pteridophytes are biphyletic while seed plants are mono- phyletic. Evolutionary innovations, such as the appearance of different heteromorphic alternation of generations, sporophyte apical meristem, polysporangiate sporophyte, vascular tissue, leaf (microphyll and megaphyll), and seed, have been increasingly understood not only by paleobotani- cal, comparative morphological, biochemical, and developmental studies, but also by recent mole- cular genetic analyses. Key words : alternation of generations, leaf, molecular phylogeny, polysporangiate plants, seed, sporophyte, vascular tissue. the most closely related to the land plants (Gra- Ancestor of Land Plants ham, 1993). Close relationships to other green The earth, born 4.6 billion years ago, was long algae or secondarily symbiotic brown algae are inorganic but experienced a chemical evolution not considered to be true, although they had ever until the appearance of the first prokaryotic been postulated. The hypothesis for the land organisms at least 3.5 billion years ago. Subse- plants-charophytes relationship is based on cor- quently eukaryotes appeared 1.5–2.7 billion respondence in several microstructures and bio- years ago, and three major lineages of life, i.e., chemical characters, e.g., chrolophylls a and b, animals, fungi and plants, were diverged and starch as stored carbohydrates, cellulose as a much later (1 billion years later) multicellular- major component of cell walls, phragmoplasts ized (Futuyma, 2005). All of those organisms appearing at cytokinesis and a cell plate dividing lived aquatic first and invaded the land 450–500 daughter cells, multilayered structure (MLS) at million years ago. The first terrestrial organisms the base of the flagellar apparatus, and presence were plants (which may have been preceeded by of glycolate oxidase. Molecular phylogenetic microorganisms) and followed by animals. Inva- analyses also support the monophyly of land sion to land was a process of conquering virgin plants and charophytes, which hence are together environments characterized by drought and grav- called streptophytes (Fig. 1; Lewis and McCourt, ity. 2004; references cited therein). From recent mol- The land plants evolved from diversified green ecular phylogenetic studies it is shown that the algae sensu lato, among which charophytes are land plants are sister to Charophyceae of charo- 2 Masahiro Kato algae have changed the global environment to the one that allowed terrestrial life. Biochemical Compounds That Supported Invasion The ozone layer may be called the outer shield because it was an important environmental ele- ment for the terrestrial life. In the earlier environ- ments in which the ozone layer was not so suffi- ciently thick and effective, plants protected them- selves from UV by means of secondary metabo- lites such as flavonoids (Cooper-Driver, 2001). Most bryophytes and other land plants can biosynthesize flavonoids. Ancestral land plants Fig. 1. Innovations mapped on simplified phylo- are likely to have protected their cells, in particu- genetic tree of streptophytes (Adapted from lar DNA by absorbing UV with these intracellu- Kato, 2000). lar flavonoids. Therefore such chemical com- pounds may be called the inner shield. The cuti- phytes and together sister to Coleochaete. If it is cle covering the plant epidermis may play a simi- correct, the land plants evolved from the com- lar role of the inner shield. These inner shields mon algal ancestor to Charophyceae some 1 bil- have protected plant bodies since the land inva- lion years ago or earlier (Sanderson et al., 2004). sion through the present. Recently, the appear- However, land plant ancestry remains unsettled ance and development of the ozone holes has (e.g., Turmel et al., 2007). been a global environmental issue and, in re- Fossil data show that organisms expanded their sponse to such an environmental change, the habitats from the water (perhaps fresh or brack- Antarctic bryophytes (mosses) were reported to ish) to the land several hundred million years have increased biosynthesis of flavonoids. A ago. It is likely that, although ancestral multicel- report that the algal charophytes also produce lular algae may have attempted to invade the land flavonoids is evaluated with caution. before the success, the land may not have provid- The terrestrial organisms, in contrast to the ed habitats suitable for terrestrial life. The then aquatic organisms, are exposed to the stress of terrestrial environments are likely to have dif- drought and gravity. Invasion from water to land fered from the present ones in which the ozone may not have been abrupt, but perhaps passed via layer in the atmosphere (stratosphere) reduces unstable waterfronts that were apt to be dried harmful UV to reach the earth surface. In the temporarily. Land plants became adapted to the early phase of the evolution of living organisms, terrestrial environment with some innovations. cyanobacteria (blue green algae), then together The cuticular layer covering the surface of the with eukaryotic algae, produced O2, which in- body of land plants protects it from drought. This creased in the air, as a byproduct of photosynthe- structure is also useful to protect from microbe sis. Accompanied with O2 increase in the air, part infection and reflect UV. The cuticular layer con- of it converted to O3 in the atmosphere zone, tains cutin that is synthesized from both fatty resulting in the development of the ozone layer. acids and phenolics, but the evolutionary origin Several hundred million years ago, the ozone of its synthetic pathway is uncertain. Interesting- layer became as thick as for organisms to be able ly, the body of Coleochaete, a member of the to live terrestrial. Thus, aquatic photosynthetic charophytes, like bryophytes (Cook and Graham, Evolution of Land Plants 3 1998) is covered by a cuticle-like envelope (Gra- Appearance of Sporophyte Generation ham, 1993). Spores (and also pollen) are disseminules Land plants clearly differ from algae in having and/or propagules indispensable to the terrestrial multicellular gametangia, i.e., antheridia and life. Spores and pollen are covered by thick and archegonia, so they are called archegoniophytes. resistant spore and pollen walls, which protect Land plants are also designated as embryophytes, them from stresses of drought, low temperature, because the embryo grows within the archegoni- and UV, and allow air-borne dispersal. Spore and um. Both antheridia and archegonia are multicel- pollen walls are primarily composed of polymer- lular reproductive organs, compared to unicellu- ic sporopollenin. This chemical compound is lar antheridia and oogonia of charophytes and present not only in spores and pollen of land other green algae. The gametangia of Charo- plants but also in the cell wall of the Charo- phyceae are exceptionally multicellular, but differ phyceae zygote, suggesting that its origin is old. from those of land plants in morphological and Sporopollenin, along with cutin and lignin (see functional aspects. The zygote or fertilized egg below), is a member of a family of biopolymers develops into an embryo within the multicellular that are biosynthetically related. The biosynthesis archegonium in the land plants, whereas the and its timing of sporopollenin, which is likely to zygote develops alone after fertilization in algae. be delayed from zygote formation seen in Charo- The embryo is heterotrophic, absorbing nutrients phyceae to sporogenesis in land plants, are an and water from the mother gametophytic plant interesting issue in order to understand the origin through the foot at the base of the embryo. Thus of land plants. the archegonium is a multifunctional organ that Lignin is also an important chemical com- not only produces an egg cell but also brings up pound for further evolution of land plants. Lignin the zygote or embryo. Certainly, such an is a major substance of the secondary wall of archegonium and embryonic foot were associated conductive and supporting cells in vascular with the appearance of embryophytes or land plants. In contrast to aquatic algae living in the plants, but the evolutionary origin of these organs buoyant environment, land plants are obliged to remains uncertain. live under a strong stress of gravity. Vascular Land plants show alternation of generations plants and mosses develop supporting tissues. (Fig. 2). The sporophyte is an asexual generation Bryophytes do not have vascular tissues, due to to propagate by spores, while the gametophyte is absence of lignin biosynthesis, but vascular a sexual generation that yields male and female plants have such biosynthetic passways. In the gametes (sperm and egg cell). The zygote or early evolution of land plants, a group with vas- fertilized egg develops to the next sporophyte, cular tissue-like tissues (called provascular which produces spores through meiosis. It is plants, see below) appeared from bryophytes and noted that there is no alternation of generations then evolved into vascular plants. Another role of in charophytes, although they are considered to the vascular tissue is conduction of water and nu- be close to the algal ancestor of land plants.