Devonian As a Time of Major Innovation in Plants and Their Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Devonian As a Time of Major Innovation in Plants and Their Communities 1 Back to the Beginnings: The Silurian-­ 2 Devonian as a Time of Major Innovation 15 3 in Plants and Their Communities 4 Patricia G. Gensel, Ian Glasspool, Robert A. Gastaldo, 5 Milan Libertin, and Jiří Kvaček 6 Abstract Silurian, with the Early Silurian Cooksonia barrandei 31 7 Massive changes in terrestrial paleoecology occurred dur- from central Europe representing the earliest vascular 32 8 ing the Devonian. This period saw the evolution of both plant known, to date. This plant had minute bifurcating 33 9 seed plants (e.g., Elkinsia and Moresnetia), fully lami- aerial axes terminating in expanded sporangia. Dispersed 34 10 nate∗ leaves and wood. Wood evolved independently in microfossils (spores and phytodebris) in continental and 35AU2 11 different plant groups during the Middle Devonian (arbo- coastal marine sediments provide the earliest evidence for 36 12 rescent lycopsids, cladoxylopsids, and progymnosperms) land plants, which are first reported from the Early 37 13 resulting in the evolution of the tree habit at this time Ordovician. 38 14 (Givetian, Gilboa forest, USA) and of various growth and 15 architectural configurations. By the end of the Devonian, 16 30-m-tall trees were distributed worldwide. Prior to the 17 appearance of a tree canopy habit, other early plant groups 15.1 Introduction 39 18 (trimerophytes) that colonized the planet’s landscapes 19 were of smaller stature attaining heights of a few meters Patricia G. Gensel and Milan Libertin 40 20 with a dense, three-dimensional array of thin lateral 21 branches functioning as “leaves”. Laminate leaves, as we We are now approaching the end of our journey to vegetated 41 AU3 22 now know them today, appeared, independently, at differ- landscapes that certainly are unfamiliar even to paleontolo- 42 23 ent times in the Devonian. In the Lower Devonian, trees gists. As we delve deeper and deeper in time, we will visit a 43 24 were not present and plants were shrubby (e.g., succession of some of the earliest plant life to cover Earth. 44 25 Aglaophyton major), preserved in a fossilized community Until this point, our time has been spent in various woodland 45 26 at the Rhynie chert locality in Scotland and other places. settings and, without a doubt, there were wooded topogra- 46 27 Many of these stem-group plants (i.e., preceding the dif- phies where we begin our “hike” [U1501]. But, unlike the 47 28 ferentiation of most modern lineages) were leafless and past 390 million years, trees will not remain a part of the 48 29 rootless, anchored to the substrate by rhizoids. The earli- countryside as we step back further and further in time. Trees 49 30 est land plant macrofossil remains date back to the and tree-like architectures will disappear from the fossil 50 record. We will see a significant decrease in the heights of the 51 plants anchored to more primitive soils, and we will pass 52 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this chapter (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35058-1_15) contains supplemen- through the oldest shrub- or meadow-like areas where the 53 tary material, which is available to authorized users. tallest forms may have been only head high. As we continue 54 further, plants become diminutive, barely brushing against 55 P. G. Gensel (*) our ankles but appearing, seemingly, like a carpet covering all 56 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA available moist surfaces. And, finally, we reach a point where 57 e-mail: [email protected] we no longer encounter evidence of the very earliest plants in 58 I. Glasspool · R. A. Gastaldo sediments of a continental nature. Rather, minute and scat- 59 Department of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA tered remains attributed to land plants, including their micro- 60 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] scopic parts, are now found preserved in ocean basins along 61 M. Libertin · J. Kvaček with members of the Paleozoic fauna (see Chap. 14). Before 62 AU1 National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 E. Martinetto et al. (eds.), Nature through Time, Springer Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35058-1_15 P. G. Gensel et al. Fig. 15.1 Archaeopteris has been described as the earliest known “modern tree”, having a woody trunk, growing to heights in excess of 30 m and bearing near-horizontal, helically arranged deciduous branches. (a) Artist reconstruction. Despite this, Archaeopteris has many features far removed from those of trees today. This progymnosperm had a pteridophytic method of reproduction and bore some of the earliest planate leaves, though they are remarkably fern-like in appearance. (b) Lateral branch with alternately arranged ultimate branches bearing spirally arranged, planar leaves. (a) © The Field Museum, GEO86500_125d and Karen Carr, Artist. With permission. (b) Image courtesy of Walter Cressler AU5 63 we enter the unknown, let us begin with an overview of what Protolepidodendropsis, which were persistent into the lat- 91 64 is familiar and what is unfamiliar. est Paleozoic. The second forest is stranger. These puz- 92 65 Traveling up or down any major Late Devonian river by zling forests were comprised of medium to very tall trees 93 66 “dugout” canoe, we first encounter the riparian forests lining that bore no leaves. Each tree had a sort of crown made up 94 67 the riverside in which the major tree, Archaeopteris, is known of branches that branched and branched and branched and 95 AU6 68 (Fig. 15.1). The name of this woody tree is a misnomer terminated in a branch. These plants, the cladoxylopsids 96 69 because it implies that the plant is an “early (archaeo) fern Calamophyton or Eospermatopteris, first appear in the 97 70 (pteris)”. Rather, this canopy-forming tree possessed a weird Middle Devonian and are successful cohabitants until the 98 71 combination, or mosaic, of gymnosperm and fern features, early Late Devonian. Lianescent (vines) and herbaceous 99 72 and is placed in a plant group distinctive from the others plants are known to occur in some of these early forests, as 100 73AU4 we’ve encountered thus far (see Sect. 15.1.1). When well as ancestors to the lycopsids, the zosterophylls (see 101 74 Archaeopteris colonized the landscape, the land’s surface Box 15.1), comparable to Early Devonian taxa. Plants get 102 75 was covered by a well-established tiered community. Gallery smaller the further we regress in time, with short-stature 103 76 forests grew adjacent to swampy areas populated by sprawl- riparian and coastal marsh-like vegetation expanding in 104 77 ing shrubs (Rhacophyton) and smaller groundcover plants, the late Early Devonian. These replaced open areas cov- 105 78 such as Protobarinophyton. Other low-lying environments ered by a “green fuzz” of the earliest vegetation in moist 106 79 were colonized by the earliest tree lycopsids, including settings adjacent to river or ocean margins (Silurian to ear- 107 80 Lepidosigillaria or Cyclostigma, similar to those that domi- liest Devonian) [U1503]. Descendants of the early colo- 108 81 nated wetland settings in the Carboniferous (see Chap. 13). nizers are still found in the mosses and liverworts. Yet, we 109 82 By the latest Devonian, plants had evolved reproductive have no evidence that any other earliest plant group 110 83 strategies to conquer seasonally dry regions outside of the remained relatively static and survived until today. 111 84 wetlands. Here, several types of early seed plants, such as Fossils representing the earliest evidence of plants, con- 112 85 Elkinsia, were abundant. These forests that might seem sisting of small to “large” macrofossils (large being a relative 113 86 familiar, in a general sense, become less familiar as we term of only several centimeters in length) and dispersed 114 87 approach the Middle Devonian. spores, take us into an even stranger world. While most of 115 88 Middle Devonian forests can be separated into two these fossils are found in Silurian and Devonian rocks, the 116 89 types [U1502]. The forest structure that retains a familiar earliest evidence of plants is known from the Ordovician 117 90 feeling is dominated by tree lycopsids such as (Katian or possibly earlier; Wellman 2010). Marine rocks 118 15 Back to the Beginnings: The Silurian-Devonian as a Time of Major Innovation in Plants and Their Communities 119 preserve small sporangia with spore tetrads, an evolutionary in our site visits to the Siluro-Devonian, however, the terms 169 120 feature ascribed to all higher plants (Steemans et al. 2009), rhyniophytoid, rhyniophyte, zosterophyll, trimerophyte, and 170 121 as well as a myriad of dispersed spore assemblages contain- progymnosperm, accompanied by diagnostic characters, will 171 122 ing similar types of spores from various parts of the globe. be used in the postcard descriptions to follow. 172 123 Before we machete our way through these unknown terranes, 124 we need to gain an appreciation for the plant groups that 125 occupied Silurian-Devonian landscapes. Box 15.1: Relationships of Siluro-Devonian Plants: Banks (1968) to Kenrick and Crane (1997) to Now 126 15.1.1 Relationships Banks (1968) subdivided the Early Devonian “psilo- phytes” into several distinct lineages, which were rec- 127 When fossil plants first were recognized as more than just a ognized as subdivisions. These were the Rhyniophytina, 128 carbon smudge on a rock surface, all Early Devonian plants Zosterophyllophytina, and Trimerophytina, and he 129 were collectively referred to as the “psilophyte flora” due to clarified lineages such as Lycophytina, the cladoxylop- 130 a similarity in growth architecture to a living plant (Arber sids, and the progymnosperms.
Recommended publications
  • History and Philosophy of Systematic Biology
    History and Philosophy of Systematic Biology Bock, W. J. (1973) Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification Systematic Zoology 22: 375-392 Part of a general symposium on "Contemporary Systematic Philosophies," there are some other interesting papers here. Brower, A. V. Z. (2000) Evolution Is Not a Necessary Assumption of Cladistics Cladistics 16: 143- 154 Dayrat, Benoit (2005) Ancestor-descendant relationships and the reconstruction of the Tree of Lif Paleobiology 31: 347-353 Donoghue, M.J. and J.W. Kadereit (1992) Walter Zimmermann and the growth of phylogenetic theory Systematic Biology 41: 74-84 Faith, D. P. and J. W. H. Trueman (2001) Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference Systematic Biology 50: 331-350 Gaffney, E. S. (1979) An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction, pp. 79-111 in Cracraft, J. and N. Eldredge (eds.) Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology Columbia University Press, New York. Gilmour, J. S. L. (1940) Taxonomy and philosophy, pp. 461-474 in J. Huxley (ed.) The New Systematics Oxford Hull, D. L. (1978) A matter of individuality Phil. of Science 45: 335-360 Hull, D. L. (1978) The principles of biological classification: the use and abuse of philosophy Hull, D. L. (1984) Cladistic theory: hypotheses that blur and grow, pp. 5-23 in T. Duncan and T. F. Stuessy (eds.) Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History Columbia University Press, New York * Hull, D. L. (1988) Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science University of Chicago Press. An already classic work on the recent, violent history of systematics; used as data for Hull's general theories about scientific change.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of Lycopods ""'"'Ill{
    Origin and evolution of lycopods C. G. K. Ramanujam Ramanujam CGK 1992. Origin and evolution of lycopods. Palaeobotanist 41 51·57. The lycopods are known from as early as Sieginean Stage of the Lower Devonian. Lower and Middle Devonian lycopods were all herbaceous. Arborescent taxa appeared by Upper Devonian (e.g., Cyclostigma and Lepidosigillaria). The microphyllous foliage of lycopods seem to have originated from enations as well as telomic trusses. The lycopods auained peak of their evolution during the Upper Carboniferous. Towards the close of the Carboniferous and dawn of the Permian, with gradual dWindling and disappearance of swamps, the lepidodendrids suffered drastic decline numerically and phytogeographically. General aridity of the Triassic resulted in acute dwarfing as evidenced by Pleuromeia. This trend continued funher resulting in the highly telescoped Nathorstiana during the Cretaceous. The earlier lycopods were homosporous; heterospory appeared by Upper Devonian. Heterospory ran rampant in the Lepidodendrales. The ultimate in heterospory and the approach to seed habit could be witnessed in Lepidocarporz. Four discrete types of strobilus organization could be recognized by the Lower Carboniferous, viz., 1. Lepidostrobus type, 2. Mazocarpon type, 3. Achlamydocarpon type, and 4. Lepidocarpon type. Recent studies point towards the origin of lycopods along rwo different pathways, with both Zosterophyllopsida and Rhyniopsida representing the progenirors All available evidence show that Lycopsida constitutes a "Blind Alley"
    [Show full text]
  • Fossils and Plant Phylogeny1
    American Journal of Botany 91(10): 1683±1699. 2004. FOSSILS AND PLANT PHYLOGENY1 PETER R. CRANE,2,5 PATRICK HERENDEEN,3 AND ELSE MARIE FRIIS4 2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; 3Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052 USA; 4Department of Palaeobotany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Developing a detailed estimate of plant phylogeny is the key ®rst step toward a more sophisticated and particularized understanding of plant evolution. At many levels in the hierarchy of plant life, it will be impossible to develop an adequate understanding of plant phylogeny without taking into account the additional diversity provided by fossil plants. This is especially the case for relatively deep divergences among extant lineages that have a long evolutionary history and in which much of the relevant diversity has been lost by extinction. In such circumstances, attempts to integrate data and interpretations from extant and fossil plants stand the best chance of success. For this to be possible, what will be required is meticulous and thorough descriptions of fossil material, thoughtful and rigorous analysis of characters, and careful comparison of extant and fossil taxa, as a basis for determining their systematic relationships. Key words: angiosperms; fossils; paleobotany; phylogeny; spermatophytes; tracheophytes. Most biological processes, such as reproduction or growth distic context, neither fossils nor their stratigraphic position and development, can only be studied directly or manipulated have any special role in inferring phylogeny, and although experimentally using living organisms. Nevertheless, much of more complex models have been developed (see Fisher, 1994; what we have inferred about the large-scale processes of plant Huelsenbeck, 1994), these have not been widely adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterospory: the Most Iterative Key Innovation in the Evolutionary History of the Plant Kingdom
    Biol. Rej\ (1994). 69, l>p. 345-417 345 Printeii in GrenI Britain HETEROSPORY: THE MOST ITERATIVE KEY INNOVATION IN THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF THE PLANT KINGDOM BY RICHARD M. BATEMAN' AND WILLIAM A. DiMlCHELE' ' Departments of Earth and Plant Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OXi 3P/?, U.K. {Present addresses: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburiih, Inverleith Rojv, Edinburgh, EIIT, SLR ; Department of Geology, Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EHi ijfF) '" Department of Paleohiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC^zo^bo, U.S.A. CONTENTS I. Introduction: the nature of hf^terospon' ......... 345 U. Generalized life history of a homosporous polysporangiophyle: the basis for evolutionary excursions into hetcrospory ............ 348 III, Detection of hcterospory in fossils. .......... 352 (1) The need to extrapolate from sporophyte to gametophyte ..... 352 (2) Spatial criteria and the physiological control of heterospory ..... 351; IV. Iterative evolution of heterospory ........... ^dj V. Inter-cladc comparison of levels of heterospory 374 (1) Zosterophyllopsida 374 (2) Lycopsida 374 (3) Sphenopsida . 377 (4) PtiTopsida 378 (5) f^rogymnospermopsida ............ 380 (6) Gymnospermopsida (including Angiospermales) . 384 (7) Summary: patterns of character acquisition ....... 386 VI. Physiological control of hetcrosporic phenomena ........ 390 VII. How the sporophyte progressively gained control over the gametophyte: a 'just-so' story 391 (1) Introduction: evolutionary antagonism between sporophyte and gametophyte 391 (2) Homosporous systems ............ 394 (3) Heterosporous systems ............ 39(1 (4) Total sporophytic control: seed habit 401 VIII. Summary .... ... 404 IX. .•Acknowledgements 407 X. References 407 I. I.NIRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF HETEROSPORY 'Heterospory' sensu lato has long been one of the most popular re\ie\v topics in organismal botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Record of Megaphylls and Leafy Structures, and Their Initial Diversification
    Review Geology August 2013 Vol.58 No.23: 27842793 doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5799-x Earliest record of megaphylls and leafy structures, and their initial diversification HAO ShouGang* & XUE JinZhuang Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Received January 14, 2013; accepted February 26, 2013; published online April 10, 2013 Evolutionary changes in the structure of leaves have had far-reaching effects on the anatomy and physiology of vascular plants, resulting in morphological diversity and species expansion. People have long been interested in the question of the nature of the morphology of early leaves and how they were attained. At least five lineages of euphyllophytes can be recognized among the Early Devonian fossil plants (Pragian age, ca. 410 Ma ago) of South China. Their different leaf precursors or “branch-leaf com- plexes” are believed to foreshadow true megaphylls with different venation patterns and configurations, indicating that multiple origins of megaphylls had occurred by the Early Devonian, much earlier than has previously been recognized. In addition to megaphylls in euphyllophytes, the laminate leaf-like appendages (sporophylls or bracts) occurred independently in several dis- tantly related Early Devonian plant lineages, probably as a response to ecological factors such as high atmospheric CO2 concen- trations. This is a typical example of convergent evolution in early plants. Early Devonian, euphyllophyte, megaphyll, leaf-like appendage, branch-leaf complex Citation: Hao S G, Xue J Z. Earliest record of megaphylls and leafy structures, and their initial diversification. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 27842793, doi: 10.1007/s11434- 013-5799-x The origin and evolution of leaves in vascular plants was phology and evolutionary diversification of early leaves of one of the most important evolutionary events affecting the basal euphyllophytes remain enigmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryophytic Sporophytes in the Rhynie and Windyfield Cherts
    Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences http://journals.cambridge.org/TRE Additional services for Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Embryophytic sporophytes in the Rhynie and Windyeld cherts Dianne Edwards Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences / Volume 94 / Issue 04 / December 2003, pp 397 - 410 DOI: 10.1017/S0263593300000778, Published online: 26 July 2007 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0263593300000778 How to cite this article: Dianne Edwards (2003). Embryophytic sporophytes in the Rhynie and Windyeld cherts. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 94, pp 397-410 doi:10.1017/S0263593300000778 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/TRE, IP address: 131.251.254.13 on 25 Feb 2014 Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 94, 397–410, 2004 (for 2003) Embryophytic sporophytes in the Rhynie and Windyfield cherts Dianne Edwards ABSTRACT: Brief descriptions and comments on relationships are given for the seven embryo- phytic sporophytes in the cherts at Rhynie, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. They are Rhynia gwynne- vaughanii Kidston & Lang, Aglaophyton major D. S. Edwards, Horneophyton lignieri Barghoorn & Darrah, Asteroxylon mackiei Kidston & Lang, Nothia aphylla Lyon ex Høeg, Trichopherophyton teuchansii Lyon & Edwards and Ventarura lyonii Powell, Edwards & Trewin. The superb preserva- tion of the silica permineralisations produced in the hot spring environment provides remarkable insights into the anatomy of early land plants which are not available from compression fossils and other modes of permineralisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Land Plants and Fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee
    PROOF The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): 1–33 The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): xxx–xxx 0031–0174/2019 0031–0174/2019 Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee GREGORY J. RETALLACK Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. *Email: gregr@uoregon. edu (Received 09 September, 2019; revised version accepted 15 December, 2019) ABSTRACT The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): Retallack GJ 2019. Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee. The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): xxx–xxx. 1–33. Ordovician land plants have long been suspected from indirect evidence of fossil spores, plant fragments, carbon isotopic studies, and paleosols, but now can be visualized from plant compressions in a Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian or 460 Ma) sinkhole at Douglas Dam, Tennessee, U. S. A. Five bryophyte clades and two fungal clades are represented: hornwort (Casterlorum crispum, new form genus and species), liverwort (Cestites mirabilis Caster & Brooks), balloonwort (Janegraya sibylla, new form genus and species), peat moss (Dollyphyton boucotii, new form genus and species), harsh moss (Edwardsiphyton ovatum, new form genus and species), endomycorrhiza (Palaeoglomus strotheri, new species) and lichen (Prototaxites honeggeri, new species). The Douglas Dam Lagerstätte is a benchmark assemblage of early plants and fungi on land. Ordovician plant diversity now supports the idea that life on land had increased terrestrial weathering to induce the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event in the sea and latest Ordovician (Hirnantian)
    [Show full text]
  • THE EVOLUTION of XYLEM ANATOMY in EARLY TRACHEOPHYTES by ELISABETH ANNE BERGMAN
    Conquering the terrestrial environment: the evolution of xylem anatomy in early tracheophytes Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Bergman, Elisabeth Anne Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 03:01:29 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626731 CONQUERING THE TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT: THE EVOLUTION OF XYLEM ANATOMY IN EARLY TRACHEOPHYTES By ELISABETH ANNE BERGMAN ____________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors Degree With Honors in Biology with an Emphasis in Biomedical Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 7 Approved by: ____________________________ Dr. Brian Enquist Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Acknowledgements Many thanks go to all of those who made contributions, big and small, to my honors thesis, and more notably, my education. Foremost, I thank Dr. Brian Enquist for accepting me into his lab and serving as my mentor for two years. I appreciate all of the time he put in to meet with me and help me to develop my honors thesis. Additional thanks go to Dr. Sean Michaletz who first introduced me to the work that would eventually become my honors thesis. From the University of Santa Cruz, California, I thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Observations on Zosterophyllum Yunnanicum Hsü from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China
    This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/77818/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Edwards, Dianne, Yang, Nan, Hueber, Francis M. and Li, Cheng-Sen 2015. Additional observations on Zosterophyllum yunnanicum Hsü from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 221 , pp. 220-229. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.03.007 file Publishers page: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.03.007 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.03.007> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders. @’ Additional observations on Zosterophyllum yunnanicum Hsü from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China Dianne Edwardsa, Nan Yangb, Francis M. Hueberc, Cheng-Sen Lib a*School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK b Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China cNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 20560-0121, USA * Corresponding author, Tel.: +44 29208742564, Fax.: +44 2920874326 E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Investigation of unfigured specimens in the original collection of Zosterophyllum yunnanicum Hsü 1966 from the Lower Devonian (upper Pragian to basal Emsian) Xujiachong Formation, Qujing District, Yunnan, China has provided further data on both sporangial and stem anatomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Orca.Cf.Ac.Uk/114269
    This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/114269/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Edwards, Dianne, Honegger, Rosmarie, Axe, Lindsey and Morris, Jennifer L 2018. Anatomically preserved Silurian 'nematophytes' from the Welsh Borderland (UK). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 187 (2) , pp. 272-291. 10.1093/botlinnean/boy022 file Publishers page: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boy022 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boy022> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders. Anatomically preserved Silurian ‘nematophytes’ from the Welsh Borderland UK. DIANNE EDWARDS1*, ROSMARIE HONEGGER2, LINDSEY AXE 1, and JENNIFER L. MORRIS1,3 1School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 2Institute of P lant Biology, University of Z ürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Z ürich, Switzerland 3School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol S8 1TQ UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Stratified charcoalified fragments of thalloid organisms with tripartite tissue construction have been isolated from the basal member of the Upper Silurian (upper Ludlow) Downton Castle Sandstone Formation, exposed near Ludlow, Shropshire, England and are considered to have had fungal affinity.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy International Journal of Paleopathology 4 (2014) 1–16 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Paleopathology jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpp Invited Commentary Plant paleopathology and the roles of pathogens and insects a,b,c,d,∗ b,1 Conrad C. Labandeira , Rose Prevec a Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA b Department of Geology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa c College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China d Department of Entomology and BEES Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 29742, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Plant pathologies are the consequence of physical and chemical responses by plants to invasive microor- Received 1 June 2013 ganisms or to imbalances in nutritional or environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]