Publication No153 06.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tuff Crater Insects
«L» «NZAC_CODE1», «LOC_WIDE», «LOCALITY», «LOC_NARROW», «LOC_Specific» Herbivores found at locality, all observations listed by species within major group 192 Acalitus australis (Lamb, 1952) (Arachnida, Acari: Prostigmata, Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae) (Puriri erineum mite). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N02: record 31/03/2013 leaf erineum seen 208 Aceria calystegiae (Lamb, 1952) (Arachnida, Acari: Prostigmata, Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae) (Bindweed gall mite). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N06: record 31/03/2013 pocket galls common 222 Aceria melicyti Lamb, 1953 (Arachnida, Acari: Prostigmata, Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae) (Mahoe leaf roll mite). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N30: record 31/03/2013 a few leaf edge roll galls seen 241 Eriophyes lambi Manson, 1965 (Arachnida, Acari: Prostigmata, Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae) (Pohuehue pocket gall mite). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N20: record 31/03/2013 pocket galls on leaves 2997 Illeis galbula Mulsant, 1850 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Cucujoidea, Coccinellidae) (Fungus eating ladybird). Biostatus: adventive CFA1303_N04: record 31/03/2013 large larva on puriri leaf, no obvious fungal food 304 Neomycta rubida Broun, 1880 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, Curculionidae) (Pohutukawa leafminer). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N32: record 31/03/2013 holes in new leaves 7 Liriomyza chenopodii (Watt, 1924) (Insecta, Diptera, Opomyzoidea, Agromyzidae) (Australian beet miner). Biostatus: adventive CFA1303_N18: record 31/03/2013 a few narrow leaf mines 9 Liriomyza flavocentralis (Watt, 1923) (Insecta, Diptera, Opomyzoidea, Agromyzidae) (Variable Hebe leafminer). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N08: record 31/03/2013 a few mines on shrubs planted near Wharhouse entrance 21 Liriomyza watti Spencer, 1976 (Insecta, Diptera, Opomyzoidea, Agromyzidae) (New Zealand cress leafminer). Biostatus: endemic CFA1303_N07: record 31/03/2013 plant in shade with leaf mines, one leaf with larval parasitoids, larva appears to be white 362 Myrsine shoot tip gall sp. -
Interspecific Variation in Competitor Avoidance and Foraging Success in Sap-Attracted Insects
Eur. J. Entomol. 106: 529–533, 2009 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1484 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Interspecific variation in competitor avoidance and foraging success in sap-attracted insects JIICHIRO YOSHIMOTO* Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan Key words. Aggressive interactions, community, foraging strategy, interference competition, resources, tree sap Abstract. Many insect species attracted to fermenting sap often fight for access to this resource, which results in the establishment of interspecific dominance hierarchies. In one such system, the hornet Vespa mandarinia (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) behaviourally dominates during the daytime and several subordinate species avoid aggressive interactions in various ways. In order to elucidate the interspecific variation in competitor-avoidance behaviour and its subsequent effect on foraging success, the behaviour of species of hornets, beetles and butterflies at patches (exudation spots) in Japan was recorded. The percentage of individuals that succeeded in visiting a patch following departure from one, or an attempted visit, or after waiting near a patch for t 10 s, did not differ greatly among species, despite the distinctive differences in dominance between V. mandarinia and the other species. These results suggest that subordinate species may be equally effective at foraging for sap as the dominant species. The competitor-avoidance behaviour differed among the species. Vespa crabro and satyrine butterflies mainly avoided competition by actively moving away from com- petitors. The beetle Rhomborrhina japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) often remained close to an occupied patch and waited for the occupant to leave, whereas V. -
Male and Female Bees Show Large Differences in Floral Preference
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/432518; this version posted November 16, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Male and female bees show large differences in floral preference 2 3 Michael Roswell [email protected] 4 Graduate program in ecology and evolution, Rutgers University 5 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08904 6 7 Jonathan Dushoff 8 Department of biology, McMaster University 9 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario ON L8S 4K1 10 11 Rachael Winfree 12 Department of ecology, evolution, and natural resources, Rutgers University 13 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08904 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/432518; this version posted November 16, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 14 Abstract 15 16 1. Intraspecific variation in foraging niche can drive food web dynamics and 17 ecosystem processes. Field studies and theoretical analysis of plant-pollinator 18 interaction networks typically focus on the partitioning of the floral community 19 between pollinator species, with little attention paid to intraspecific variation 20 among plants or foraging bees. In other systems, male and female animals 21 exhibit different, cascading, impacts on interaction partners. -
Biolphilately Vol-64 No-3
BIOPHILATELY OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE BIOLOGY UNIT OF ATA MARCH 2020 VOLUME 69, NUMBER 1 Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum. —Augustus De Morgan Dr. Indraneil Das Pangolins on Stamps More Inside >> IN THIS ISSUE NEW ISSUES: ARTICLES & ILLUSTRATIONS: From the Editor’s Desk ......................... 1 Botany – Christopher E. Dahle ............ 17 Pangolins on Stamps of the President’s Message .............................. 2 Fungi – Paul A. Mistretta .................... 28 World – Dr. Indraneil Das ..................7 Secretary -Treasurer’s Corner ................ 3 Mammalia – Michael Prince ................ 31 Squeaky Curtain – Frank Jacobs .......... 15 New Members ....................................... 3 Ornithology – Glenn G. Mertz ............. 35 New Plants in the Philatelic News of Note ......................................... 3 Ichthyology – J. Dale Shively .............. 57 Herbarium – Christopher Dahle ....... 23 Women’s Suffrage – Dawn Hamman .... 4 Entomology – Donald Wright, Jr. ........ 59 Rats! ..................................................... 34 Event Calendar ...................................... 6 Paleontology – Michael Kogan ........... 65 New Birds in the Philatelic Wedding Set ........................................ 16 Aviary – Charles E. Braun ............... 51 Glossary ............................................... 72 Biology Reference Websites ................ 69 ii Biophilately March 2020 Vol. 69 (1) BIOPHILATELY BIOLOGY UNIT -
Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) 23 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.306.5216 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 306: 23–36A review (2013) of the genus Monema Walker in China (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) 23 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.306.5216 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A review of the genus Monema Walker in China (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) Zhaohui Pan1,†, Chaodong Zhu2,‡, Chunsheng Wu2,§ 1 Institute of Plateau Ecology, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, Linzhi 860000, P.R. China 2 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:327D5273-1638-4F19-BF87-345AA1E264D9 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8B542B39-2118-4146-83F8-73AB65257FB9 § urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:9ED21D9F-83DB-4F22-AAB2-C9F0F5ABD12C Corresponding author: Chaodong Zhu ([email protected]); Chunsheng Wu ([email protected]) Academic editor: E. van Nieukerken | Received 27 March 2013 | Accepted 29 May 2013 | Published 3 June 2013 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4FFDB920-7E4A-4F33-9D8E-16CC7189723F Citation: Pan Z, Zhu C, Wu C (2013) A review of the genus Monema Walker in China (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae). ZooKeys 306: 23–36. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.306.5216 Abstract Four species and one subspecies of the genus Monema Walker, 1855 are recognized from China, in which M. tanaognatha Wu & Pan sp. n. is described as new, M. coralina Dudgeon, 1895 and M. meyi Solovyev & Witt, 2009 are newly recorded for China. The female of M. meyi is reported for the first time. Monema ni- grans de Joannis, 1901 and M. melli Hering, 1931 are synonymized with M. -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
Limacodidae Belippe Horrida Walker, 1865
Limacodidae Belippe horrida Walker, 1865 Taxonomy Belippa horrida Walker, 1865.– S. China. Cheromettia formosaensis Kawada, 1930.– Horisya, Taiwan. Hostplant Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 1750-2020 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Birthamiodes junctura (Walker, 1865) Taxonomy: Hyblaea junctura Walker, 1865.– Cambo- dia. Hostplant:: Flight period: v, viii. Altitude: 875-900 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Chalcoscelides castaneipars (Moore, 1865) Taxonomy Miresa castaneipars Moore, 1865.– India (Darjeeling). Hostplant Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 910-2020 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Nephelimorpha argentilinea (Hampson, 1892) Taxonomy Parasa argentilinea Hampson, 1892.– Margarita, Assam, India. Hostplant Flight period: vi. Altitude: 575 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Parasa himalepida Holloway, 1987 Taxonomy Parasa himalepida Holloway, 1987.– Htawgaw, Upper Burma, 1830 m. Hostplant Flight period: vi. Altitude: 2020 m. Remarks. Niet volledig zekere determi- natie. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Parasa pastoralis Butler, 1885 Taxonomy Parasa pastoralis Butler, 1885.– Bhutan. Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Scopelodes venosa Walker, 1855 Taxonomy: Scopelodes venosa Walker, 1855.– Bangladesh (Silhet). Scopelodes aurogrisea Moore, 128.- Ceylon. Scopelodes ursina Butler, 1886.– Bangladesh (Silhet). Hostplant Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 340-575 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Scopelodes vulpina Moore, 1879 Taxonomy Scopelodes vulpina Moore, 1879.– India (Darjeeling). Scopelodes tantula Swinhoe, 1904.– India (Khasia Hills). Hostplant : Flight period: v. Altitude: 1750 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Setora postornata (Hampson, 1900) Taxonomy Setora sinensis Moore, 1877.– Shanghai, China. Thosea postornata Hampson, 1900 Thosea postornata ab. Hampsoni Strand, 1916.– Sikkim, India. Hostplant Flight period: vi. Altitude: 1530 m. Imago Distribution map Limacodidae Squamosa ocellata (Moore, 1879) Taxonomy Monema ocellata Moore, 1879.– India (Darjeeling). -
Acrolepiopsis Assectella
Acrolepiopsis assectella Scientific Name Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller, 1893) Synonym: Lita vigeliella Duponchel, 1842 Common Name Leek moth, onion leafminer Type of Pest Moth Taxonomic Position Class: Insecta, Order: Lepidoptera, Family: Acrolepiidae Figures 1 & 2. Adult male (top) and female (bottom) Reason for Inclusion of A. assectella. Scale bar is 1 mm (© Jean-François CAPS Community Suggestion Landry, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 2007). Pest Description Eggs: “Roughly oval in shape with raised reticulated sculpturing; iridescent white” (Carter, 1984). Eggs are 0.5 by 1 0.2 mm (< /16 in) (USDA, 1960). Larvae: “Head yellowish brown, sometimes with reddish brown maculation; body yellowish green; spiracles surrounded by sclerotised rings, on abdominal segments coalescent with SD pinacula, these grayish brown; prothoracic and anal plates yellow with brown maculation; thoracic legs yellowish brown’ crochets of abdominal prologs arranged in uniserial circles, each enclosing a short, longitudinal row of 3–5 crochets” 1 (Carter, 1984). Larvae are about 13 to 14 mm (approx. /2 in) long (McKinlay, 1992). Pupae: “Reddish brown; abdominal spiracles on raised tubercles; cremaster abruptly terminated, dorsal lobe with a Figure 3. A. assectella larvae rugose plate bearing eight hooked setae, two rounded ventral on stem of elephant garlic lobes each bearing four hooked setae” (Carter, 1984). The (eastern Ontario, June 2000) (© 1 cocoon is 7 mm (approx. /4 in) long (USDA, 1960). “The Jean-François Landry, cocoon is white in colour and is composed of a loose net-like Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 2007). structure” (CFIA, 2012). Last updated: August 23, 2016 9 Adults: “15 mm [approx. /16 in wingspan]. Forewing pale brown, variably suffused with blackish brown; terminal quarter sprinkled with white scales; a distinct triangular white spot on the dorsum near the middle. -
Attraction of Monema Flavescens Males to Synthetic Blends of Sex Pheromones
Bulletin of Insectology 69 (2): 193-198, 2016 ISSN 1721-8861 Attraction of Monema flavescens males to synthetic blends of sex pheromones 1 2 1 2 3 2 Shuzhen YANG , Hongxia LIU , Haixia ZHENG , Meihong YANG , Yanxia REN , Jintong ZHANG 1Agronomy College, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China 2Institute of Chemical Ecology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China 3Shanxi Branch Valley Biological Pesticide Co. Ltd, Taigu, Shanxi, China Abstract This study was performed in Luanxian County, Hebei Province, China, from June to August of 2014 and 2015. We sought to de- velop a new and effective method for controlling the moth Monema flavescens. We synthesized the principal female sex phero- mones and conducted a series of field experiments using traps baited with (E)-8-decen-1-ol (E8-10:OH), (Z)-7,9-decadien-1-ol (Z7,9-10:OH), and (Z)-9,11-dodecadien-1-ol (Z9,11-12:OH), alone or in combination. The number of males captured by traps baited with synthetic E8-10:OH increased when Z7,9-10:OH, Z9,11-12:OH, or both was/were added. Traps baited with a 10:2:1 (w/w/w) mixture of E8-10:OH, Z7,9-10:OH, and Z9,11-12:OH at a total dose of 650 µg septum−1 were the most efficient. Further, a delta trap hung about 1.5 m above the ground was very effective. Our work will facilitate safer and more environmentally friendly management of M. flavescens. Key words: Monema flavescens, sex pheromone trapping, (E)-8-decen-1-ol, (Z)-7,9-decadien-1-ol, (Z)-9,11-dodecadien-1-ol. -
White Plant Shoots, Wax-Producing Insects and Other White Structures Made by Arthropods: a Mimicry Complex?
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 343–349, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.043 POINT OF VIEW White plant shoots, wax-producing insects and other white structures made by arthropods: A mimicry complex? KAZUO YAMAZAKI Osaka Institute of Public Health, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji, Osaka 543-0026, Japan; e-mail: [email protected]. jp Key words. Plant mimicry, anti-herbivore defence, cocoon, entomopathogenic fungus, spider egg sac, spittlebug froth, trichome, wax Abstract. Many insects masquerade as parts of plants, such as bark or leaves, or mimic poisonous organisms in order to defend themselves against predators. However, recent studies indicate that plants may mimic insects and other arthropods to deter herbi- vores. Here, I report visually similar white structures of plants and arthropods in Japan and suggest they are part of a mimicry com- plex. Young shoots covered with white trichomes or waxy substances may mimic wax-producing insects, such as woolly aphids, coccids and caterpillars, potentially resulting in reduced herbivory. Since wax-producing insects would reduce plant quality and quantity, be distasteful and attract natural enemies, herbivorous insects and mammals may avoid such white shoots. Furthermore, fungus-infected insects, gregarious braconid cocoons, spider egg sacs and froth made by froghopper nymphs or blasticotomid sawfl y larvae are also conspicuously white and impose risks for herbivorous insects. Thus, these white structures may be mimicry models for white shoots and are likely to be part of a defensive mimicry complex. Although this study focuses on defence against herbivores, there are simultaneous physiological roles for white colouration that will not be discussed in depth here. -
Thesis Draft Rough
Wesleyan University The Honors College Plant-pollinator interactions across California grassland and coastal scrub vegetation types on San Bruno Mountain, San Mateo County by Miles Gordon Brooks Class of 2020 A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Departmental Honors from the College of the Environment Middletown, Connecticut April, 2020 1 2 Abstract Animal pollination of plants is a crucial ecosystem service for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function, worldwide. High pollinator abundance and diversity can likewise improve the reproductive success of the plant community. Plant-pollinator interaction networks have the potential to identify dominant, specialist, and generalist pollinator species within a system, and their host plant counterparts. Understanding these relationships is paramount for buffering natural systems from biodiversity loss in a world where pollinator abundance continues to decline rapidly. San Bruno Mountain (SBM) in San Mateo County, California, is one of the last natural, open spaces in the urban landscape in the northern San Francisco Peninsula. I conducted a series of timed meanders and vegetation surveys at eight sample sites within SBM (four grassland and four coastal scrub sites) to identify plant species prevalence and pollinator species visitation of flowering plants. I employed a multivariate approach for investigating plant and pollinator species richness, plant and pollinator community composition, and trophic-level interactions across the SBM landscape, and I evaluated differences in these relationships between grassland and coastal scrub habitats. A total of 59 pollinator species and 135 plant species were inventoried over the course of the study. -
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4