DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology of Buzzards Bay: an Estuarine Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

: ''"V / •■ ' —, ■■■■■ '-^'äad • -"'j'^-'K*?--;' Vr V *• ':'VV\.:' .?<■ • . ■• J .%- Me A ■>J iftr fi^ '"? 1: -Afe CIV« V.' »•-i .§- ■■V1*»' •■-A "i:?" .•^: ! t-3 -V"■''''■v..--i; ,M .<£*'. k. ' "V;*Ml ]f» ';■/ "i, I W- ■ JJMM^ _•% ,* v.v-;■■...: '-S f ■■\") SP£ H National pological Service ■ 'J.3. E)epartment of the Interior W'yC:E'P^äÄ^ ;i tRjCK ^> r- Biological Report 31 September 1996 Ecology o| Buzzards Bay: An Estuarine Profile \& A- I & '-'& - * m ~>^3m$!k^ £t. 'ife«l© l^iSiL'iL ''- -'V.:4"!...L]f7 * National Biological Service Technical Report Series This report is the last item to be published in the National Biological Service's Biological Report series. Future reports of this nature will be published in one of the series listed below. Questions regarding these series should be mailed electronically to [email protected]. Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Information and Technolog}' Reports ISSN 1081-2911 Papers published in this series record the significant find- ings resulting from USGS/NBS-sponsored and cospon- These reports are intended for the publication of book- sored research programs. They may include extensive data length-monographs; synthesis documents; compilations or theoretical analyses. These papers are the in-house coun- of conference and workshop papers; important planning terpart to peer-reviewed journal articles, but with less strin- and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard gent restrictions on length, tables, or raw data, for example. operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manu- We encourage authors to publish their findings in the most als; and data compilations such as tables and bibliogra- appropriate journal possible. However, the Biological Sci- phies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review ence Reports represent an outlet in which BRD authors and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. may publish papers that are difficult to publish elsewhere due to the formatting and length restrictions of journals. At the same time, papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. Funding for printing this report was provided by the NBS National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette, LA. Production was also by the NBS National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette. LA (see inside back cover). To purchase this report, contact the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, * VA 2216! (call toll free 1-800-553-6847), or the Defense Technical Information Center, 8725 Kingman Rd., Suite 0944. Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218. Preceding PageS Blank Form approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 ■ ■ „„„„«. includina time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, Washington, DC 20503. ' 3. REPORT" TYPE AND DATES COVERED 2. REPORT DATE 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) September 1996 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Ecology of Buzzards Bay: An Estuarine Profile 6. AUTHOR(S) B.L. Howes and D.D. Goehringer [8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION TTPERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES REPORT NUMBER Coastal Ecological Research Institute Biological Department Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution at Woods Hole Woods Hole, MA 02543 Woods Hole, MA 02543 10 SPONSORING, MONITORING Ti^ONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES AGENCY REPORT NUMBER U.S. Department of the Interior Biological Report 31 National Biological Service Washington, DC 20240 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Errata sheet added. 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Release unlimited. NTIS,DoDD 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) metroDolitan corridor from Washington to Boston. The bay Buzzards Bay remains one of the few relatively pnst ne bay n the metropo ,ta ^ ^ ^^ ^ m and its surrounding marshes and uplands have providedla vane* o»« before them Today the uplands e f years but also to the Native Americans who rebed on th ^ «tua^ oMhouan y ^ ^^ ^ ^^ lues add divided between 18 commun.fes, and while the bay ,s stilexplo.ted tor « becom£ c]ear ^ ^ heafth of to the growing concern to preserve .ts f n™°nmen'a'''"f * ™ "^"^ just by processes within the bay waters themselves but Buzzards Bay ecosystem, like almost at «tuanne sys terns .antr^^^ and manage this system, it is important to ;ä=ä":ä:-«=Biy _,em „ „ _ iMndrf „ „presenl ,„ the summarize the dominant ecolog.ca processes ha st ™ ^J* itjes Wlthin contributing watersheds, understanding the 14. SUBJECT TERMS (Keywords) vi + 141 pp. Buzzards Bay, estuarine ecology, ecosystem, watershed 16. PRICE CODE 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ABSTRACT OF REPORT THIS PAGE Unclassified Unlimited Unclassified Unclassified Standard Form 298 (rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 Biological Report 31 September 1996 US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL BIOLOGICAL SERVICE Ecology of Buzzards Bay: An Estuarine Profile Brian L. Howes and Dale D. Goehringer Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 and Center for Marine Science and Technology University of Massachusetts New Bedford, Massachusetts 02744 Project Officer Rebecca J. Howard National Biological Service National Wetlands Research Center 700 Cajundome Boulevard Lafayette, Louisiana 70506 ro U.S. Department of the Interior National Biological Service Washington, D.C. 20240 DUG QUALITY INSPECTED i 'V^^rf^.- :v^4 '"" ••■■-ivS^p^. "■ '■-'• ■•■*>;-*s*; Errata Sheet for: Howes, B.L., and D.D. Goehringer.1996. Ecology of Buzzards Bay: an estuarine profile. The correct number for this report is Biological Report 33. The front cover, tide page, and spine copy should read Biological Report 33 The suggested citation on page //' should read: Howes, B.L., and D.D. Goehringer.1996. Ecology of Buzzards Bay: an estuarine profile. National Biological Service Biological Report 33. vi+141 pp. The headers on even-numbered pages should read Biological Report 33. Block 10 of the Report Documentation Page (SF298) should read Biological Report 33. (90/ Suggested citation: Howes B.L and D.D. Goehringer. 1996. Ecology of Buzzards Bay: an estuarine profile Na- tional Biological Service Biological Report 31. vi + 141 pp. li Contents Page Preface • 1 Abstract 3 Chapter 1. Introduction to the Watershed-Bay Ecosystem 5 1.1. Description 7 1.2. History • n 1.3. PresentDay 13 Chapter 2. Geology 17 2.1. Formation 19 2.2. AMarineBay 22 2.3. Sediments of Buzzards Bay 24 Chapter 3. Physical Environment 27 3.1. FreshWater: Rain, Surface, and GroundwaterFlows 29 3.2. Salinity, Temperature, and Density 31 3.3. Circulation/Currents and the Tidal and Wind Regime 33 Chapter 4. Buzzards Bay Natural Resources 39 4.1. Open Water and Embayments 41 4.1.1. Fauna 41 4.1.2. Flora and Aquatic Primary Productivity 55 4.2. Intertidal 59 4.2.1. SaltMarshes 59 4.2.2. TidalFlats 66 4.3. Terrestrial 67 4.4. Unique and Threatened Environments 68 4.4.1. Anadromous Fish Runs 68 4.4.2. Endangered Species 70 Chapters. Land Use, Economy, and Fisheries 77 5.1. LandUse 79 5.2. Economy 79 5.2.1. Towns within the Watershed 79 5.2.2. Economic Resources and Water Quality 82 5.3. Fisheries 88 Chapter 6. A Changing Buzzards Bay 95 6.1. Humanlmpacts 97 6.1.1. Cape Cod Canal 97 6.1.2. Overfishing 98 6.1.3. Bacterial Contamination 100 6.1.4. Toxic Pollutants 100 6.1.5. Nutrients and Cultural Eutrophication 104 6.2. Natural Modification 109 6.2.1. Relative Sea-level Rise 109 6.2.2. Storms 117 Chapter 7. Management 121 7.1. Toxic Pollutants 123 7.2. Coliform Contamination and Shellfish Closures 124 7.3. Nutrient Loading 126 7.4. Relative Sea-level Rise 129 Acknowledgments 130 References 131 in Tables 1.1. Physiographic features of the Buzzards Bay system 10 1.2. Comparison of representative North American bays 10 1.3. Dimensions ofthe major embayments of Buzzards Bay 10 3.1. Estimated freshwater flows to Buzzards Bay 29 4.1. Dominant soft-bottom, hard-bottom, and rocky intertidal communities in Buzzards Bay..... 42 4.2. Dominant commercially valuable fish species in Buzzards Bay in order of post-1960 abundance and their food preferences 49 4.3. Dates of "First Catch" for various species of finfish in Buzzards Bay, recorded by a weir fishery for 1880 50 4.4. Birds of Buzzards Bay 54 4.5. Annual primary production ofthe aquatic resources of Buzzards Bay 55 4.6. Eelgrass {Zostera marina) potential habitat versus present area colonized inBuzzardsBay 5g 4.7. Occurrence and abundance ofresident and nonresident salt marsh fishes 63 4.8. Mean total length and average percent increase in length/month of resident and nonresident salt marsh fishes 63 4.9. Average gut fullness, percent fish with empty guts, and percent carnivory, herbivory, and detritivory in diets ofresident and nonresident fishes 64 4.10. Average biomass and release of ammonia into marsh waters during summer by major marsh organisms 65 4.11. Anadromous fish runs within the Buzzards Bay watershed 69 4.12. Rare plants and wildlife identified for the Cape Cod region including the Buzzards Bay watershed 71 5.1. Recreational versus commercial shellfish landings for Buzzards Bay by year 91 5.2. Commercial lobster landings for Buzzards Bay from 1981 to 1991 93 6.1. Nitrogen inputs to Buzzards Bay from sewage treatment plants 106 6.2. Annual inputs of nitrogen to Buzzards Bay waters 108 6.3. Projected losses of upland acreage in Buzzards Bay coastal towns 113 7.1. Land use within the Buzzards Bay watershed 128 Figures 1.1. Satellite photograph of Buzzards Bay and Cape Cod 7 1.2. Aerial photograph of research institutions in the village of Woods Hole, Falmouth, Massachusetts g 1.3. Towns ofthe Buzzards Bay watershed region g 1.4. Rivers and harbors ofthe Buzzards Bay system 9 1.5. Urban and nonurban population growth in the Buzzards Bay watershed 15 2.1.
Recommended publications
  • Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2018) 48 (4): 341–362 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02451 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST AND CHARACTERISATION OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA (ELASMOBRANCHII AND ACTINOPTERYGII) OF THE LAGUNA DE TAMIAHUA, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3 1 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, SAGARPA, Ciudad de México 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México Raz-Guzmán A., Huidobro L., Padilla V. 2018. An updated checklist and characterisation of the ichthyofauna (Elasmobranchii and Actinopterygii) of the Laguna de Tamiahua, Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 48 (4): 341–362. Background. Laguna de Tamiahua is ecologically and economically important as a nursery area that favours the recruitment of species that sustain traditional fisheries. It has been studied previously, though not throughout its whole area, and considering the variety of habitats that sustain these fisheries, as well as an increase in population growth that impacts the system. The objectives of this study were to present an updated list of fish species, data on special status, new records, commercial importance, dominance, density, ecotic position, and the spatial and temporal distribution of species in the lagoon, together with a comparison of Tamiahua with 14 other Gulf of Mexico lagoons. Materials and methods. Fish were collected in August and December 1996 with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl from different habitats throughout the lagoon. The species were identified, classified in relation to special status, new records, commercial importance, density, dominance, ecotic position, and spatial distribution patterns.
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
  • Fisheries Data on Northern·Kingfish

    Fisheries Data on Northern·Kingfish

    BIOLOGICAL @-'. FISHERIES DATA ON NORTHERN·KINGFISH .. Menticirrhus s'axatilis (Bloch and Schneider) JULY 1982 Biological and Fisheries Data on the Northern Kingfish, Menticirrhus saxatilis Daniel E. Ralph U. S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Center Sandy Hook Laboratory Highlands, New Jersey 07732 Technical Series Report No. 27 CONTENTS 1. IDENTITY 1.1 Nomenclature................................................. 1 1.1.1 Valid Name.. 1 1. 1.2 Synonymy... ........................................... 1 1. 2 Taxonomy... .................................................. 1 1.2.1 Affinities.................. 1 1.2.2 Taxonomic Status...................................... 5 1.2.3 Subspecies 5 1. 2.4 Common Names.......................................... 5 1.3 Morphology............ 5 1.3.1 Externa1 Morphology................................... 5 1.3.2 Cytomorphology.............. 6 1.3.3 Protein Specificity... 6 2. DISTRIBUTION 2.1 Total Area................................................... 6 2.2 Differential Distribution....... 6 2.3 Determinants of Distribution............... 8 2.4 Hybridization.,... 8 3. BIONOMICS AND LIFE HISTORY 3.1 Reproduction................................................. 8 3.1.1 Sexuality 8 3.1.2 Maturity.............................................. 8 3.1.3 Mating................................................ 9 3.1.4 Fertilization...... 9 3.1.5 Gonads 9 3.1.6 Spawning.............................................. 9 3.1.7
  • BBP8911 Technical Resource Manual

    BBP8911 Technical Resource Manual

    TECHNICAL RESOURCE MANUAL: A REFERENCE FOR BUZZARDS BAY COWUNITIES AUGUST 1987 Credits Compiled, with additional text, by Susan R. Moor and William S. Napolitano Stephen C. Smith, Executive Director Thomas A. Pisaturo, Comprehensive Planning Manager Tracy Cabral, Secretary Anne Duf resne, Secretary , - This report was prepared by the Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District (SRPEDD), with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Buzzards Bay Project. u This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project. The results and conclusions contained herein are those of the author(s). These conclusions have been reviewed by competent outside reviewers and found to be reasonable and legitimate based on the available data. The Management Committee of the Buzzards Bay Project accepts this report as technically sound and complete. The conclusions do not necessarily represent the recommendations of the Buzzards Bay Project. Final recommendations for resource management actions will be based upon the results of this and other investigations. Environmental Protection ~gency Thomas Bigford National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Steve Bliven Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Leigh Bridges Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jack Clarke Cape Cod Planning and Economic Development Commission Richard De,laney Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Meriel Hardin Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Dr. Russell Isaac Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control Dr. Susan Peterson President, Coalition for Buzzards Bay Dr. Don Phelps Environmental Protection Agency Ted Pratt Chairman, Buzzards Bay Citizens Advisory Committee Stephen Smith Southeast Regional Planning and Economic Development District BNC~Tripp Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project.
  • Plymouth County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    Plymouth County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    VOLUME 3 OF 5 PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 PRELIMINARY: APRIL 18, 2018 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV003D Version Number 2.3.3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 5 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 17 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 17 2.2 Floodways 34 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 35 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 35 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 35 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 35 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 37 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 38 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 39 SECTION 3.0
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
  • Town of Marion, Massachusetts 2016 Annual Report

    Town of Marion, Massachusetts 2016 Annual Report

    ! ! "#$%!#&!'()*#%+!'(,,(-./,011,! ! ! ! ! 2345! 6%%/(7!809#)1! ! Town of Marion Municipal Telephone Directory Emergency Numbers Ambulance - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only Fire Dept. - 748-1177 Police Dept. - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only 911 - Emergency Only Office of Emergency Management - 748-1212 911- Emergency Only Town House - 748-3500 Two Spring Street Board of Appeals – 748-3560 Harbormaster office – 748-3515 Board of Assessors – 748-3518 Planning Board – 748-3517 Board of Health – 748-3530 Recreation Department – 774-217-8355 Board of Selectmen -748-3520 Registrars of Voters – 748-3526 Building Department – 748-3516 Town Accountant – 748-3523 Conservation Commission – 748-3560 Town Administrator – 748-3520 Council on Aging – 748-357 0 Town Clerk – 748-3502 Facilities Manager – 748-3089 Town Planner – 748-3513 Fire Inspections – 748-3510 Treasurer/Collector – 748-3505 Veteran’s Services – 758-4100, Ext. 212 Department of Public Works - 50 Benson Brook Road - 748-3540 Elizabeth Taber Library - 748-1252 Harbormaster/Shellfish Officer - 748-3535 Superintendent of Schools - 758-2772 Sippican School - 748-0100 Old Rochester Regional Junior High School - 758-4928 Old Rochester Regional High School - 758-3745 Front cover photo by Michelle Smith One Hundred Sixty Second Annual Report of the Town Officers of Marion For the Year Ending December 31st 2016 —Table of Contents— In Memoriam . 4 Elected Town Officials. 6 Appointed Town Officials & Staff . 7 General Government Reports Board of Selectmen/Water & Sewer Commissioners . 16 Board of Assessors . 18 Planning Board . 20 Department of Public Works. 22 Water Committee . 26 Building Commissioner . 28 Zoning Board of Appeals . 30 Facilities Manager . 31 Town House Building Committee .
  • Comparative Sensory and Energetic Ecology of Sciaenid Fishes and Their Competitors in Chesapeake Bay, VA

    Comparative Sensory and Energetic Ecology of Sciaenid Fishes and Their Competitors in Chesapeake Bay, VA

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2009 Comparative sensory and energetic ecology of sciaenid fishes and their competitors in Chesapeake Bay, VA Andrij Z. Horodysky College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Horodysky, Andrij Z., "Comparative sensory and energetic ecology of sciaenid fishes and their competitors in Chesapeake Bay, VA" (2009). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539616699. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-wdtk-qy37 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARATIVE SENSORY AND ENERGETIC ECOLOGY OF SCIAENID FISHES AND THEIR COMPETITORS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY, VA A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Andrij Zenon Horodysky 2009 APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved August 2009. q-:af.;;; Committee Chairman, co-Advisor Mark R. Patterson, Ph.D. '~-- Duke University Durham, NC ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my grandfather, John Zenon Horodysky, Ph. D., J.D. (1915-2002), who always made time to take me fishing and dreamed about seeing his grandson pursue a graduate education.
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes

    Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
  • Nearshore Fish Community Structure in the Southwest Bay

    Nearshore Fish Community Structure in the Southwest Bay

    NEARSHORE FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN THE SOUTHWEST BAY OF FUNDY AND NORTHWEST ATLANTIC: COMPARING ASSEMBLAGES ACROSS MULTIPLE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES by Collin Arens B.Sc. (Hon), University of New Brunswick, 2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master’s of Science In the Graduate Academic Unit of Biology Supervisors: David Methven, Ph.D., Dept of Biology, CRI, UNB Saint John Kelly Munkittrick, Ph.D., Dept of Biology, CRI, UNB Saint John Examining Board: Matthew Litvak, Ph.D., Dept. of Biology, UNB Saint John Keith Dewar, Ph.D., Faculty of Business, UNB Saint John This thesis has been accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April, 2007 © Collin Arens, 2007 ABSTRACT The purpose of this investigation was to assess seasonal, tidal/diel and regional variation in the nearshore fish assemblage of the southwest Bay of Fundy, as well as identify overlying patterns in taxonomic and functional guild structure throughout coastal shallows of the northwest Atlantic. Within the southwest Bay of Fundy species richness and abundance varied seasonally and were correlated with water temperature exhibiting distinct cold and warm water assemblages throughout the year. Over a 24 hour period greater species richness and abundance were observed among samples collected at low tide, with larger fishes captured at night. Regionally, assemblage structure was largely influenced by habitat type with geographic proximity among sites having little direct influence on the structure observed. Throughout the northwest Atlantic taxonomic structure reflected existing biogeographic provinces with the Labrador, Acadian and Virginian provinces represented, while functional guild structure exhibited latitudinal gradients with respect to ecological type and egg dispersal.
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project

    Massachusetts Estuaries Project

    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Brian Howes Tony Millham Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Ed Eichner Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean W. Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello Cape Cod Commission Xiaotong Wu © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade.