DOCSLIB.ORG

Map of Schools, Hospitals, Fire Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Map of Schools, Hospitals, Fire Stations nA! *# n n *# *#! n ! ! n n A!! n A nn A A ! n ! A # nn !n n n n n nA*# n n A n " * nn An n n Legend *# n 80 n u n A! n n n n n *#n*#n ¨¦§ A!nnnu" *#n n n n nn nn A! A! Potential Intake Site (Only Two of Three Sites Required) n n n n n ! ! n !n n A !n An A! n nA n n A! nn n*# nA n n Boundary of Potential Facility Corridors nn n nnn ! nn nn n n n"A n n nn *# n ! u n nn n n Public Schools n *# A Americann Rivern West A! A! *# n nn A! A! n*# *#*# n n n n n A!*# u" Hospitals A! Sacramentonn *#A*#!Sacramenton *# A!n n nn ! A!*# n! n n *# ! Port*#A! nA u"u"Anu" u" ! n nA!u" n A Fire Stations u" n A!nn n A n! n nn ! n n n of Sacramento nn ¤£50 n nA ! Annnnn nn n *#*#nnu"" n *# ! A *# Local Law Enforcementn n! n *# A!n n A! n nn *#u" n n nn nA n nA n n n u" A! ! n n *#A! n n n nA! nn *# An nn nn A! n A! nA!n nnn n nn*#A! ABH113 n nn *#n n n 505 n A!n n ¨¦§ ! n*# n n *# A n n n ABH16 ABH84 n n A! *#n nn n n n n ! n n n *#n n Yolo County nA n n ! GLIDE n ! nnn A n n n nAnn !n nA! DISTRICT n n A S a c r a m e n t o nn n n A! n n nnnu"*# nCA! o u n t y n n A! n n n A! Freeport nu" A!n n n n n n nn LISBON nn*# n n n*# DISTRICT nn n nn n ! n nA! A nn ABH99 n ! n n!n A ClarksburgA! ! A ¨¦§80 nn A! n nA nn *#nn n n n !n 5 An *# A! ¨¦§ n n n nn A!n u" n ! n n nAnn nA! n n NETHERLANDS n n A! ! n ! Cosumnes River A A!n n ! A nn Au"n MERRITT Hood *# n Solano! County ISLAND nnn n A n ! RANDALL A n CACHE ISLAND ! HAAS ! A LITTLE !nnnCourtland A n MOORE A HOLLAND TRACT TRACT PETERS GLANVILLE TRACT POCKET LIBERTY PIERSON ABH104 ISLAND SUTTER n LIBERTY ISLAND DISTRICT n! nn FARMS A n n HASTINGS PROSPECT n nn n n n n!n n A! TRACT ISLAND A n! n n A MCCORMACK- ABH WILLIAMSON *# ! n 113 TRACT A ABH84 GRAND ISLAND Locke n !n ! nA A! RYER ISLAND *#AnWalnut Grove EGBERT TRACT Ryde DEAD HORSE NEW HOPE n Thornton ISLAND TRACT A! ABH99 ABH12 LITTLE ! EGBERT A n TRACT San JoaquinA! CANAL C o u n t y RANCH Mokelumne River *# TYLER ISLAND TRACT n GRIZZLY n ! ISLAND RionA! *#AnIsleton n BRACK ! n Vistan TRACT A SCHAFTER- BRANNAN-ANDRUS n ! PINTAIL ! n A ISLANDA STATEN n n Birds Landing ISLAND A!n Lodin! nn *#An! TERMINOUS nn nA TRACT u" nnu" ABH12 ! n SIMMONS-WHEELER TWITCHELL BOULDIN A n ISLAND !n ISLAND ISLAND Terminous n An n DECKER SHIN KEE n HONKER Collinsville ISLAND TRACT BAY CLUB ! RIO BLANCO A n BRADFORD WEBB TRACT VENICE TRACT 5 n VAN SICKLE Sacramento River ISLAND ISLAND ¨¦§ ISLAND SHERMAN EMPIRE KING ABH88 TRACT ISLAND ISLAND CHIPPS WINTER LITTLE BISHOP ISLAND ISLAND FRANK'S MEDFORD TRACTn nA! BROWNS TRACT FRANKS TRACT ISLAND nnn ATLASn n n nn n ISLAND LITTLE TINSLEY n nn ! JERSEY MANDEVILLE TRACT n Bay! Point nA KIMBALL DONLON ISLAND ISLAND ISLAND nn n n n A n Pittsburg BETHEL ISLAND ISLAND nn n! n ! ISLAND WEST ISLAND LITTLE n n A ! n n A SHIMA nn A *#n *#n MANDEVILLE QUIMBY n! n ! n nn BIG BREAK RINDGE TRACT A n A n *# Bethel IslandA! ISLAND ISLAND n n n! n A! TRACT n A n nn MCDONALD n ! n Calaveras River n n*# nnn DUTCH SLOUGH HOLLAND WRIGHT- n nn nA n Antioch n RHODE ISLAND n n n n ! n n n HOTCHKISS TRACT ELMWOOD n n n n An *#! ISLAND ! nn n n nA TRACT TRACT SMITHn TRACTA n nn n Oakley n San Joaquin River n*# n BACON MILDRED SARGENT- nnn *# n nu" nA! n ! n nn A!n ISLAND ISLAND BARNHARTAnn nn n n n n TRACTn n n ABH26 n n LOWER n ! Middle River n ! n n n n AnKnightsen n n n A n n n PALM ROBERTS SMITHn TRACT u"A! n n n VEALE TRACT n*#n n n TRACT LOWER ISLAND nStocktonn nA! u"*#nnn ABH4 n n u" n n JONES ROUGH WEBER TRACTn *#nnn n ! ! n TRACT AND READYn nnn nAn A ! n BIXLER TRACT FAY ISLAND *# n*#! nn n*#A ISLAND Port*#n An n n n ! n nA!n of Stockton BOGGS n A nn n nBrentwood ORWOOD TRACT n n! ! n n WOODWARD A! An A TRACT HONKER n n n nn n *#n ISLAND LAKE nn ABH ! UPPER TRACT MIDDLE n 4 A Discovery Bay JONES ROBERTS !n n TRACT A n A! A!n ISLAND n nn nn A!n *# BYRON DREXLER n DREXLER TRACT n ! TRACT VICTORIA POCKET ! nA ISLAND " French*#A n *#nu An! C o n t r a nn n Camp ! Byron WIDDOWS A ISLAND KINGS EUCALYPTUS C o s t a C o u n t y ISLAND UNION ISLAND ISLAND n CONEY UPPER A! n ISLAND nA! Clifton ROBERTS ABH99 n*# Court ISLAND n n Forebay !n n n ! A n Banks Jones A*# nnn A! Old River STARK TRACT n n n ! A! Pumping Pumping LathropA! n A!n n A n Plant Plant n FABIAN TRACT n n n n STEWART TRACT Manteca n n n n n u" *#n nu" n n n n n nnA! A! Mountain A! nA! *#u" n n ABH120 A! n! House PICO-NAGLEE PESCADERO MOSSDALE n n A nnn nn DISTRICT ISLAND n nA! n A! n n nn *# *# n WALTHALL n n n A!n *#A!n nA! n n 205 n A! n n ¨¦§ n nnu"n A! PARADISE n ! nn JUNCTION A! Alameda County A n *#Tracy n n n n n ! n n MCMULLIN n #A n n !n ! n 5 n n ! **#A! n A! nA A ¨¦§ RANCH A! nnA n n nA!n *# *# n n n ABH33 680 n! n KASSON ¨¦§! u"! A DISTRICT A An n n RIVER n A! nnABH84 nn n n n JUNCTION n nnn A! A! n nn n nu"A! *# n Schools, Hospitals, Fire Stations & 0 2.25 4.5 Local Law Enforcement For Illustration Purposes Only ¯ Miles Near Potential Corridors T:\WGI-38\GIS_33_00\GISRequest_11F\Deliverable_10F\MLT013_20\MLT013_20_11x17_Schools_Hospitals_EMS.mxd[(kdolan) BDSN] 20200219 Data Source: DCA, DWR Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Homeland Security Infrastructure Program (HSIP) Team 02/26/2020- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY, SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA
    UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 8(2) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Deverel, Steven J Leighton, David A Publication Date 2010 DOI https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2010v8iss2art1 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California august 2010 Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Steven J. Deverel1 and David A. Leighton Hydrofocus, Inc., 2827 Spafford Street, Davis, CA 95618 AbStRACt will range from a few cm to over 1.3 m (4.3 ft). The largest elevation declines will occur in the central To estimate and understand recent subsidence, we col- Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. From 2007 to 2050, lected elevation and soils data on Bacon and Sherman the most probable estimated increase in volume below islands in 2006 at locations of previous elevation sea level is 346,956,000 million m3 (281,300 ac-ft). measurements. Measured subsidence rates on Sherman Consequences of this continuing subsidence include Island from 1988 to 2006 averaged 1.23 cm year-1 increased drainage loads of water quality constitu- (0.5 in yr-1) and ranged from 0.7 to 1.7 cm year-1 (0.3 ents of concern, seepage onto islands, and decreased to 0.7 in yr-1). Subsidence rates on Bacon Island from arability.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidence Reversal for Tidal Reconnection
    PERFORMANCE MEASURE 4.12: SUBSIDENCE REVERSAL FOR TIDAL RECONNECTION Performance Measure 4.12: Subsidence Reversal for Tidal Reconnection Performance Measure (PM) Component Attributes Type: Output Performance Measure Description 1 Subsidence reversal 0F activities are located at shallow subtidal elevations to prevent net loss of future opportunities to restore tidal wetlands in the Delta and Suisun Marsh. Expectations Preventing long-term net loss of land at intertidal elevations in the Delta and Suisun Marsh from impacts of sea level rise and land subsidence. Metric 1. Acres of Delta and Suisun Marsh land with subsidence reversal activity located on islands with large areas at shallow subtidal elevations. This metric will be reported annually. 2. Average elevation accretion at each project site presented in centimeters per year. This metric will be reported every five years. Baseline 1. In 2019, zero acres of subsidence reversal on islands with large areas at shallow subtidal elevations. 2. Short-term elevation accretion in the Delta at 4 centimeters per year. 1 Subsidence reversal is a process that halts soil oxidation and accumulates new soil material in order to increase land elevations. Examples of subsidence reversal activities are rice cultivation, managed wetlands, and tidal marsh restoration. DELTA PLAN, AMENDED – PRELIMINARY DRAFT NOVEMBER 2019 1 PERFORMANCE MEASURE 4.12: SUBSIDENCE REVERSAL FOR TIDAL RECONNECTION Target 1. By 2030, 3,500 acres in the Delta and 3,000 acres in Suisun Marsh with subsidence reversal activities on islands, with at least 50 percent of the area or with at least 1,235 acres at shallow subtidal elevations. 2. An average elevation accretion of subsidence reversal is at least 4 centimeters per year up to 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Breeding Population Size of Brandt's and Double-Crested
    Changes in Breeding Population Size of Brandt’s and Double-crested Cormorants in California, 1975-2003 Phillip J. Capitolo1, Harry R. Carter1,4, Richard J. Young1, Gerard J. McChesney2, William R. McIver1,5, Richard T. Golightly1, and Franklin Gress3 1Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 USA 2San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 524, Newark, California 94560 USA 3California Institute of Environmental Studies, 3408 Whaler Avenue, Davis, California 95616 USA Final Report for Contract # 10154-2-G106 between Humboldt State University Foundation and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service July 2004 4Current Address: 5700 Arcadia Road, Apt. #219, Richmond, British Columbia V6X2G9 Canada 5Current Address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, California 93003 USA Suggested Citation: Capitolo, P. J., H. R. Carter, R. J. Young, G. J. McChesney, W. R. McIver, R. T. Golightly, and F. Gress. 2004. Changes in breeding population size of Brandt’s and Double- crested Cormorants in California, 1975-2003. Unpublished report, Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • Updated-Maps-1-22-2020
    January 22, 2020 MAP REVISIONS Several Siting Drivers maps presented at the December Stakeholder Engagement Committee meeting are being reissued to include the potential facility corridor boundary from the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and a revised basemap that includes Delta island names. The following maps are being reissued and are provided in this packet: Map 1: Study Area Map 2: Soil Compressibility Map 3: Oil and Gas Wells Map 4: Potential Railroad Access Routes Map 5: Potential Barge Access Routes Map 6: Existing Above Ground Power Lines Map 9: Sandhill Crane Habitat Maps 7 and 8, Land Use and Sensitive Receptors, respectively, are being updated to incorporate stakeholder feedback and revised maps will be provided at a future Stakeholder Engagement Committee meeting. Map 10, 2010 River Morphology, has no changes and was not reissued. 01/22/2020 Map 1 CR E3 Bell Ave River Rd 80 Winding Way 50 Legend ¨¦§ Fair Oaks Blvd ¤£ Potential Intake Site (Only Two of Three Sites Required) San Juan Rd El CentroEl Rd Garden Hwy NorwoodAve Rio Linda Blvd El Camino Ave Coloma Rd Boundary of Potential Facility Corridors 5 AveWalnut ¨¦§ Ave Eastern Northgate Blvd Northgate Sunrise Blvd Horizontal Lines are in 10 Mile IntervalsCR 29 Arden Way West White Rock Rd Watt Ave Watt American River Sacramento Sacramento Ave Fulton Folsom Blvd 50 N St HoweAve ABH113 £ 7th St ¤ J St H St CR 98 CR 89 CR 95 American River Dr CR 105 CR 31 F St Union Pacific Railroad Pacific Union CR 32b 5th St T St Light Rail La Riviera Dr Douglas Rd L St L Y St Russell Blvd 21st
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Legacies of Delta History
    2. TheLegaciesofDeltaHistory “You could not step twice into the same river; for other waters are ever flowing on to you.” Heraclitus (540 BC–480 BC) The modern history of the Delta reveals profound geologic and social changes that began with European settlement in the mid-19th century. After 1800, the Delta evolved from a fishing, hunting, and foraging site for Native Americans (primarily Miwok and Wintun tribes), to a transportation network for explorers and settlers, to a major agrarian resource for California, and finally to the hub of the water supply system for San Joaquin Valley agriculture and Southern California cities. Central to these transformations was the conversion of vast areas of tidal wetlands into islands of farmland surrounded by levees. Much like the history of the Florida Everglades (Grunwald, 2006), each transformation was made without the benefit of knowing future needs and uses; collectively these changes have brought the Delta to its current state. Pre-European Delta: Fluctuating Salinity and Lands As originally found by European explorers, nearly 60 percent of the Delta was submerged by daily tides, and spring tides could submerge it entirely.1 Large areas were also subject to seasonal river flooding. Although most of the Delta was a tidal wetland, the water within the interior remained primarily fresh. However, early explorers reported evidence of saltwater intrusion during the summer months in some years (Jackson and Paterson, 1977). Dominant vegetation included tules—marsh plants that live in fresh and brackish water. On higher ground, including the numerous natural levees formed by silt deposits, plant life consisted of coarse grasses; willows; blackberry and wild rose thickets; and galleries of oak, sycamore, alder, walnut, and cottonwood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. Educate ~ Entertain ~ Enhance
    The Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. Educate ~ Entertain ~ Enhance Volume 7, Issue 6 — June 2017 Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. PO Box 7441 Fishing the Klamath River with Jerry Lampkin Auburn, CA 95604 The multi-talented Rooster Tail Fishing Club The Klamath is special among many rivers in 530-887-0479 member and Pro River Guide, Jerry Lampkin California. It is only second by out-flow to the www.roostertailsfishingclub.org invites all members and their guests to a spe- Sacramento River and flows 263 miles cial presentation at the third Friday breakfast through Oregon and northern California emp- Fishing the meeting on June 16th to share his experi- tying into the Pacific Ocean. It drains an ex- Klamath River for ences on the Klamath River. Jerry has been tensive watershed of almost 16,000 square fishing the Klamath for salmon and steel- miles from both states. salmon and head for over 25 years and brings with him a steelhead unique perspective about the river you will Unlike most rivers, the Klamath begins in the want to hear. Jerry and his wife Sherry will be high desert and flows toward the mountains July 12th— available to fisher men and women inter- carving a path through the rugged Cascade ested in fishing the ‘Springer Salmon Run’ and Klamath mountains before reaching the Rooster Tail Day during the week of July 10 – 14. Jerry has sea. The scenery and wild life are varied and spectacular. The area is a nature lover’s on the Klamath set aside Wednesday, July 12th, as Rooster dream and a panacea for photographers.
    [Show full text]
  • Suisun Marsh Plan-Chap 5
    Chapter 5 Physical Environment This chapter provides environmental analyses relative to physical parameters of the project area. Components of this study include a setting discussion, impact analysis criteria, project effects and significance, and applicable mitigation measures. This chapter is organized as follows: Section 5.1, “Water Supply, Hydrology, and Delta Water Management”; Section 5.2, “Water Quality”; Section 5.3, “Geology and Groundwater”; Section 5.4, “Flood Control and Levee Stability”; Section 5.5, “Sediment Transport”; Section 5.6, “Transportation and Navigation”; Section 5.7, “Air Quality”; Section 5.8, “Noise”; and Section 5.9; “Climate Change.” Suisun Marsh Habitat Management, November 2011 Preservation, and Restoration Plan 5-1 Final EIS/EIR ICF 06888.06 Section 5.1 Water Supply, Hydrology, and Delta Water Management Introduction This section describes the existing environmental conditions and the consequences of implementing the SMP alternatives on water supply, hydrology, and Delta water management. Delta water management for agriculture, water supply diversions, and exports and the salinity of water diverted for waterfowl habitat in the managed wetlands of the Marsh officially became linked in the 1978 State Water Board Delta Water Control Plan and the water right decision (D-1485) Suisun Marsh salinity standards (objectives). D-1485 required DWR and Reclamation to prepare a plan to protect the beneficial use of water for fish and wildlife and meet salinity standards for the Marsh. Initial facilities included improved RRDS facilities to supply approximately 5,000 acres on Simmons, Hammond, Van Sickle, Wheeler, and Grizzly Islands with lower salinity water from Montezuma Slough, and the MIDS and Goodyear Slough outfall to improve supply of lower salinity water for the southwestern Marsh.
    [Show full text]