TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 1

FORUM: Environment Commission ISSUE: Measures to Protect Animals Abused in STUDENT OFFICER: Yu Na Kim

POSITION: Deputy President of Environment Commission

Introduction Animal testing, refers to procedures performed on living animals to benefit man. They are designed for researching in many areas including diseases, medical products, and consumer products such as household cleaners, food additives and cosmetics. The number of animal testing taken for a single product is unimaginable. According to Humane Society, roughly 50 experiments and the use of 2,000 animals are required for the registration of a single pesticide. Not only the number of experiments taken place and the number of animals used in those experiments are hard to comprehend, the procedures of animal testing itself are also abysmal. ‘All procedures, even those classified as “mild”, have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering.’ One case of a severe result of animal testing Human Society International (HSI) elaborates, common procedures of animal testing include such as but not limited to: food/water deprivation, short/prolonged physical restraint, genetic manipulation, forced exposure to drugs, chemicals, diseases, and toxic materials through feeding, inhalation, and injection. With the rapid development of technology, the scale of animal testing and its various forms develops correspondingly, resulting in more animals abused during animal testing. While 100milion animals are killed yearly only in the United States during animal testing, people’s ambivalent feelings towards this issue is delaying the process of curing the agony faced by the animals. Nonetheless, effective measures must be implemented in full capacity to protect the animals abused in animal testing.

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 2

Background Animal testing, began to take shape since the Greeks, Arabs and Romans were simply interested in anatomical research of animals. Then, the curiosity of anatomy rose and people began to perform surgeries on animals to test whether it will save man in the future. Contemporarily, animal testing is prevalent among scientists, psychologists, and developers - in researching and A cat is physically restrained by a machine during animal testing experimenting cosmetics, diseases, psychological/physiological development, food additives, industrial/household products, drugs, on animals - as they are becoming more stoic about the issue of animal abused during animal testing. Not only the apathy towards animal testing is bringing more difficulty in protecting the animals, the lack of knowledge towards certain experiments is prompting in the increase in the number of animals abused during animal testing. For instance, Japan’s ministry of agriculture announced recently to end its year-long pesticide poisoning tests on beagle dogs after a study found them to be futile. In these poisoning tests, as many as 32 dogs are fed with pesticide-laced food every single day for a full year, then they are killed so that their organs could be examined and conduct toxicity assessment. The decision to end these tests was prompted by a two-year study by Japan’s Food Safety Commission which they proved that poisoning tests on dogs aren’t effective and therefore these poisoning tests isn’t helpful to determine the safety of pesticides. This finding is consistent with the results of similar past analysis by other countries, which led to changes in national regulatory test requirements since 2007 in the United States, followed by India, the European Union, Brazil and Canada. If effective communication were taken place and the necessary information were shared among countries, deaths of many animals could have been easily prevented without wasting time, energy, and lives. This ‘information bank’ should be settled promptly on a global scale to prevent situations similar to aforementioned ones.

Problems Raised Infringement on Animal rights is defined as a social and moral movement that challenges the view of having all nonhuman living things are created for man. It is also a “moral movement that extends moral

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 3 consideration for conscious beings.” In ‘’ written by , he states that the basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires consideration. His statement applies to this issue of animals abused in animal testing, a situation where a countless number of animals are not considered as a living, conscious being, yet are viewed solely White Rats undergo a shock experiment in a laboratory in as a ‘tool’ of man for different purposes. This Chongqing, China on February of 2008 lack of consideration is equivalent to the infringement of animal rights during animal testing especially when animals are severely abused.

Ineffectiveness Many opposers to animal testing criticizes the ineffectiveness of animal testing used in preclinical testing to select drugs for human uses. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the pharmaceutical industry all acknowledge the fact that a large percentage of drugs approved through animal testing method fail to receive approval for human use. To elaborate, this failure rate has increased from 86 percent in 1985 to 92 percent, in spite of all the “advances and refinements” intended to make animal tests more accurate. Additionally, more than many International progress revealed in 2015 on the fight against animal testing drugs approved during animal for cosmetics testing are later withdrawn or relabeled due to severe damage and adverse effects in humans. An example is the arthritis drug

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 4

Vioxx, one that was approved in animal studies, was withdrawn from the market in 2004 after causing over 60,000 deaths in the United States alone.

International Actions European Union’s Consensus “A complete ban on the sale of cosmetics developed through animal testing has taken effect in the EU. The ban applies to all new cosmetics and their ingredients sold in the EU, regardless of where in the world testing on animals was carried out”, BBC reports on 2013 of March. This was a moment where many activists of animal rights and animal protection vied for a long period. The 27 countries (at the time since Croatia joined later in July, becoming the 28th member) of the European Union came to an agreement with a new legislation to ban animal testing for cosmetics. The movement of going against animal testing began few years prior to 2013 in EU; the finished products that were tested on animals were banned in 2004, then the use of ingredients of products tested in animals were banned in 2008, and finally a full ban on both sale and import of cosmetics that are tested on animal or contain ingredients tested on animals took shape in 2013 of March.

Japan The Law for the Humane Treatment and Management of Animals, The Standards Relating to the Care and Management, and Alleviation of Pain and Distress of Experimental Animals are several documents where Japan regulates its animal experimentation upon. However, even though these guidelines exist, many laboratories in national universities don’t comply with them especially with choosing particular kinds of animals and management of animals.

Australia Committees (AECs) determines whether the use of an animal is valid or not. They follow the established Code to ensure the wellbeing of animals that are used for research purposes. For researchers to test on animals, they must submit a written proposal to convince an AEC to approve the use of animal testing.

New Zealand

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 5

Similar to Australia, every research project that associates with animal testing must be approved and monitored by an animal ethics committee. This was initiated thanks to the Act of 1999 which requires people in charge of animals to ensure that the fundamental needs of animals are met, and their pain and distress are alleviated.

Key Players European Union (EU) As mentioned previously, the 28 states of the EU were the first initiators to ban animal testing of cosmetic products, which laid a foundation for other countries to also participate in the fight against animal testing but to research on more effective alternatives of animal testing.

Humane Society International (HSI) It is one of the few global animal protection organizations that functions to help all animals, animals in laboratories, animals on farms, companion animals and wildlife. Their animal research experts team strive to draft scientific arguments that go against cruelty on animals, to end animal testing on a global scale. In a recent accomplishment achieved by Humane Society International office located in South Korea, the policy makers revised its chemical law to require prioritization of “vertebrate animal alternative testing”. This policy fundamentally prioritizes non-animal testing when producing risk and hazard information for chemicals. Borami Seo, HSI’s senior policy manager of Korea claimed “this is significant in that policy makers and chemical regulatory bodies recognized, for the first time in the law, the importance of replacing cruel and outdated practice of animal testing. This (policy) will support more research into non-animal testing methods that will better predict human safety while saving tens of thousands of animals.” Likewise, HSI works to encourage global efforts by establishing offices around the world, urging decision makers to strive to ban animal testing, and establishing global platforms where states can actively discuss the development of animal free approaches.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) PETA strives to achieve protection of animals suffering in different industries, one in which it is in laboratories, where animal testing is done. This organization is the largest worldwide animal rights non-governmental organization (NGO), conducting investigations of animal testing and

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 6 advocating campaigns for educating the public. Some detailed elaboration on its function includes pushing government agencies to stop funding animal testing, urging pharmaceutical, chemical, and consumer product, companies to replace tests on animals with other non-animal methods that are more effective, and publishing papers that provides non-animal test methods

Cruelty Free International (CFI) Formerly known as the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV), this organization exists to end animal testing worldwide. They investigate and expose the reality of life for animals that are in laboratories even at this moment. They believe ‘there is no ethical justification for using animals in experiments.’ They urged humane scientific research and cruelty free living for over 100 years. A campaign used by Cruelty Free International (CFI)

Possible Solutions

Raising Awareness The initial step in solving major world issues begins with making people care about the issue firsthand. If people do not care and are not interested in the issue of animals abused in animal testing, advocates of animal rights would simply not emerge. In fact, one of the reasons why this issue is still prevalent is due to people’s indifference towards animals testing, reducing the rate of animal protection. Therefore, for people to become staunch supporters of animal rights and against animal testing, this will be an effective measure for resolving this issue. Additionally, if more individuals become aware of the possible ways they can fight against animal testing, such as the ‘Seven ways to help animals suffering in Result of a cosmetic test on a rabbit experiment’ by PETA, then the likelihood of resolving this issue will augment significantly without any doubt.

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 7

Implementation of Effective Policies As mentioned in the ‘Background’ portion and ‘Key Players’ section, mainly ‘European Union’ and ‘Humane Society International’, of this chair report, effective policies can carry remarkable changes. Another major causes of having this issue unsettled is the continuation of governmental bodies of countries funding towards animal testing. Therefore, if there was a global consensus similar to the one accomplished by the European Union in 2013 (refer to ‘International Actions’ portion of the chair report), banning certain forms of serious animal testing such as physical restraint, will bring countless number of animals being rescued from their agony. Furthermore, as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, Safer Medicines Trust and Humane Society International have reported, 90-95% of all drugs deemed successful in animal tests fail in real application to human. If policies that targets this misuse of animal testing are implemented, animals abused during animal testing will decrease significantly.

Glossary Animal Testing Experimentation done on animals for research in areas including such as but not limited to: diseases, medical products, and consumer products such as household cleaners, food additives and cosmetics. While the purpose of animal testing varies, the procedures of animal testing itself also includes a variety: food/water deprivation, short/prolonged physical restraint, genetic manipulation, forced exposure to drugs, chemicals, diseases, and toxic materials through feeding, inhalation, and injection. Many countries have implemented policies to prevent animals abused in animal testing, yet more actions are yet to be done. Animal Rights A social and moral movement that challenges the view that all nonhuman things are created for human and it is a movement that extends moral consideration to all conscious beings. Cruelty-Free Products Products that does not test their products on animals. Many advertisers of certain companies that sells cruelty-free products utilizes this characteristic to attract people who are pro-animal rights and against animal testing.

TIANMUN 2018 Environment Commission – 8

Sources Baines, J. (2016, July 20). International Business Times. Retrieved June 23, 2018, from Animal testing is cruel, unethical, expensive, and generally inapplicable to humans.: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/four-million-animals-were-used-british-experiments-2015-why- arent-we-using-alternative-methods-1571583 BBC News. (2013, March 11). BBC News. Retrieved June 23, 2018, from EU bans sale of all animal-tested cosmetics: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-21740745 Cruelty Free International. (2018, 6 20). Cruelty Free International. Retrieved from What we do: https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/what-we-do Human Society International. (2018, April 2). Retrieved June 20, 2018, from Japan ends year-long pesticide poisioning tests on beagle bogs after study finds them pointless: http://www.hsi.org/news/press_releases/2018/04/japan-ends-pesticide-test-040218.html Humane Society International. (2018, April 2). Retrieved 6 21, 2018, from South Korea revises chemical law of require prioirtization of "vertebrate animal alternative testing": http://www.hsi.org/news/press_releases/2018/04/korea-k-reach-chemical-testing-040218.html Morgan, D. (2015, August 15). Skincare. Retrieved June 23, 2018, from Report: These Countries Have Banned Cosmetics Animal Testing: https://www.skincarewatchdog.com/report-these-countries-have-banned-cosmetics- animal-testing/ Orabona, B. (2012, December 13). Friends of Animals. Retrieved 6 22, 2018, from What is Meant by Animal Rights?: https://friendsofanimals.org/program/what-is-meant-by-animal-rights/ People of the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 18, 2018, from Animal Testing 101: https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animal-testing-101/ PETA. (2018, 6 22). PETA. Retrieved from Why Animal Rights?: https://www.peta.org/about- peta/why-peta/why-animal-rights/ Scutti, S. (2013, 6 27). Medical Daily . Retrieved 6 20, 2018, from Animal Testing: A Long, Unpretty History: https://www.medicaldaily.com/animal-testing-long-unpretty-history-247217 Speaking of Research. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 18, 2018, from Animal Rights Activists and Organizations: https://speakingofresearch.com/extremism-undone/animal-rights-activists-organizations/ Speaking of Research. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 18, 2018, from About: https://speakingofresearch.com/about/