DOCSLIB.ORG

Fixing Leaks Assessing the Department of Defense’S Approach to Preventing and Deterring Unauthorized Disclosures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fixing Leaks Assessing the Department of Defense’S Approach to Preventing and Deterring Unauthorized Disclosures CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. JAMES B. BRUCE ■ W. GEORGE JAMESON FIXING LEAKS ASSESSING THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’S APPROACH TO PREVENTING AND DETERRING UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE FIXING LEAKS ASSESSING THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’S APPROACH TO PREVENTING AND DETERRING UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES JAMES B. BRUCE ■ W. GEORGE JAMESON Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-8180-3 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND—make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute.html R® is a registered trademark Cover design by Dori Gordon Walker © Copyright 2013 RAND Corporation This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA DOHA, QA • CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org Preface In 2012, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (OUSD(I)) established the Unauthorized Disclosures Program Imple- mentation Team (UD PIT) whose mission is to prevent and deter the unauthorized disclosures of classified information by all Department of Defense (DoD) personnel through the implementation of the UD Strategic Plan. OUSD(I) asked RAND to help monitor and assess the poten- tial for effectiveness of this new DoD initiative to stem unauthorized disclosures of classified information, and make recommendations as needed. This report provides some overall observations of the RAND project team concerning the activities of the UD PIT for the period from mid-September 2012 through January 2013; then, building off those observations, the report recommends possible enhancements in the mechanisms and procedures that the UD PIT uses to accomplish its principal goals. While the study focus is limited to DoD, the recom- mendations may be of broader interest to the Intelligence Community (IC), since the DoD intelligence agencies and components belong to the IC and the scope of these issues is broader than DoD alone, and thus perhaps applicable to non-DoD IC elements. This research was sponsored by OUSD(I) and conducted within the Intelligence Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. iii iv Fixing Leaks For more information on the RAND Intelligence Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/ipc.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figure ..............................................................................vii Summary .......................................................................... ix Acknowledgments .............................................................. xix Abbreviations ................................................................... xxi CHapTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Background ......................................................................... 1 Objective and Approach ........................................................... 3 Defining Unauthorized Disclosures (“Leaks”) and Security Violations .. 4 Scope ................................................................................. 5 Organization of the Document .................................................. 5 CHapTER TWO Observations on UD PIT Effectiveness ....................................... 7 The UD PIT Has Made Discernible Progress to Date ......................... 7 Tackling a Historically Intractable Problem ...................................10 Strategic Obstacles to Overcome ..............................................11 Tactical Obstacles to Overcome .............................................. 20 CHapTER THREE Recommendations .............................................................. 27 UD PIT Management .......................................................... 27 Culture and Accountability ......................................................29 Policy and New Initiatives ......................................................32 v vi Fixing Leaks Studies and Outreach ............................................................35 APPENDIXES A. Thresholds for Taking Legal Action Against Leakers .................39 B. Leaks Questions and Responses .......................................... 43 Bibliography ......................................................................49 Figure 2.1. End-to-End Accountability Process ..............................17 vii Summary Introduction Recent unauthorized disclosures (UDs) of classified information, par- ticularly those to the public media that put sensitive operations and intelligence sources and methods at risk, have highlighted the inad- equacy of extant law and policy to address the causes of and remedies to such damaging disclosures. In response to this situation, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)) has initiated a new series of comprehensive measures, all of which are encapsulated within a Strategic Plan designed to address this heretofore intractable issue. The Plan was developed by a Department of Defense (DoD) Unau- thorized Disclosures Working Group (UDWG) assembled in response to direction from the Defense Security Enterprise (DSE) Executive Committee (EXCOM) and subsequent amplifying tasking from the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Further, pursuant to the recommendations of the UDWG, OUSD(I) established an Unauthor- ized Disclosures Program Implementation Team (UD PIT) to oversee Strategic Plan implementation and its incremental improvement. More specifically, the UD PIT, endorsed by the Defense Security Enterprise Advisory Group (DSEAG), was established to prevent and deter the unauthorized disclosure of classified information by all personnel through the implementation of the UD Strategic Plan. With a view toward enhancing its odds of success and to discover any deficiencies that, if remedied, could improve the potential effec- tiveness of the overall program, OUSD(I) asked the RAND Corpora- tion to provide an outside perspective in assessing the program concept ix x Fixing Leaks and its early implementation. Specifically, RAND was asked to moni- tor and assess the potential for effectiveness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Counter-Terrorism 1 Counter-Terrorism
    Counter-terrorism 1 Counter-terrorism WARNING: Article could not be rendered - ouputting plain text. Potential causes of the problem are: (a) a bug in the pdf-writer software (b) problematic Mediawiki markup (c) table is too wide United States Coast GuardCoast Guard on counter-terrorism patrol in Upper New York Bay. Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in distance spanning The Narrows between Brooklyn (left) and Staten Island (right).TerrorismDefinitions of terrorismDefinitionsHistory of terrorismHistoryList of terrorist incidentsIncidents Counter-terrorism (also spelled counterterrorism) incorporates the practices, Military tacticstactics, techniques, and strategies that governments, militarymilitaries, police departments and corporations adopt to attack terrorist threats and/or acts, both real and imputed.The tactic of terrorism is available to insurgencyinsurgents and governments. Not all insurgents use Fearterror as a tactic, and some choose not to use it because other tactics work better for them in a particular context. Individuals, such as Timothy McVeigh, may also engage in terrorist acts such as the Oklahoma City bombing. If the terrorism is part of a broader insurgency, counter-terrorism may also form a part of a counter-insurgency doctrine, but political, economic, and other measures may focus more on the insurgency than the specific acts of terror. Foreign internal defense (FID) is a term used for programs either to suppress insurgency, or reduce the conditions under which insurgency could develop. Counter-terrorism includes both the detection of potential acts and the response to related events. PlanningUnited States Customs and Border Protection officers, fully armed and armored for a counter-terrorism operationMost counter-terrorism strategies involve an increase in standard police and domestic intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment
    S E C R E T //NOFORN I I 20320619 DEPARTMENTOF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS,JOINT TASK FORCEGUANTANAMO U.S. NAVAL STATION,GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA APO AE 09350 JTF-GTMO-CDR 19June 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander,United StatesSouthem Command. 3511 NW 9lst Avenue. Miami,FL33172. SUBJECT: Recommendationfor ContinuedDetention Under DoD Control (CD) for GuantanamoDetainee, ISN: US9SA-000079DP(S) JTF-GTMO DetaineeAssessment 1. (S//NF) Personal Information: o JDIMSAIDRC ReferenceName: FahedA al-Harasi o Aliases and Current/True Name: Fahd Atiyah Hamza Hamid al-Harazi" Hassanal-Makki. FahedFahad" Khalid. Abu Hassan. al-Sharif. Abu Barak o Placeof Birth: Mecca. SaudiArabia (SA) o Date of Birth: 18 November 1978 o Citizenship: SaudiArabia o InternmentSerial Number (ISN): US9SA-000079DP 2. (U//T'OUO) Health: Detaineeis in good health. 3. (S//NF) JTF-GTMO Assessment: a. (S) Recommendation: JTF-GTMO recommendsthis detaineefor ContinuedDetention Under DoD Control (CD). JTF-GTMO previouslyassessed detainee for Continued Detentionwith TransferLanguage on 26May 2006. b. (S//NF) Executive Summary: Detaineeis reportedto be a memberof al-Qaida. He was identified as having attendedmilitant training and was an instructor at the al-Qaida al- Faruq Training Camp. Detaineewas in Afghanistan (AF) since 1999 during which he is assessedto have participated in hostilities againstUS and Coalition forces as a member of Classifiedby: MultipleSources REASON:E.O. 12958, AS AMENDED,Section 1.4(C) Declassi$on:20320619 S E C R E T //NOFORN I I 20320619 S E C R E T // NOFORN I I 20320619 JTF-GTMO.CDR SUBJECT: Recommendationfor ContinuedDetention Under DoD Control (CD) for GuantanamoDetainee, ISN: US9SA-000079DP(S) UsamaBin Laden's (UBL) 55th Arab Brigade.l Detainee'sname and aliaswere listed in recovereddocuments associated with al-Qaida, and the Saudi Ministry of Interior General Directorate of Investigations(Mabahith) identified him as a high priority detainee.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ethics of Nuclear Weapons and National Security Intelligence
    1 Ethics of Nuclear Weapons and National Security Intelligence Michael Andregg, University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, MN, USA, [email protected] for Presentation to the International Ethics Section of the ISA, San Francisco, April 6, 2013 Introduction From the beginning of the nuclear age there have been fears that we may have invented a weapon that will destroy us all. J. Robert Oppenheimer, who helped build the first fission bombs, commented often on this (1). Albert Einstein, whose letter to then President Franklin Roosevelt helped convince him to fund them, talked about the imperative to seek peace and new ways of thinking about everything as he neared death (2). Bertrand Russell coauthored a Manifesto with Einstein (and nine others) to warn the world that everything had changed (3). Yet thousands of thoughtful people still felt compelled by the urgencies of World War II to make nuclear weapons and to use two of them against other human beings. To end the war, they said to each other, and perhaps to show the Soviets who would be the big dog following. But then what? Another arms race had begun, and bigger, badder WMDs would be developed soon. As soon as more than one nation had nuclear weapons, some strategy had to be conceived for their use. Mutual Assured Destruction was the main result, and millions learned the irony of a “MAD” strategy, where safety was to be assured by capabilities and declared will to destroy human civilization if we were frightened enough by any enemy. Those we terrified produced similar weapons and strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Russia's Intelligence Agencies
    EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN BRIEF POLICY RELATIONS ecfr.eu PUTIN’S HYDRA: INSIDE RUSSIA’S INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Mark Galeotti For his birthday in 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin was treated to an exhibition of faux Greek friezes showing SUMMARY him in the guise of Hercules. In one, he was slaying the • Russia’s intelligence agencies are engaged in an “hydra of sanctions”.1 active and aggressive campaign in support of the Kremlin’s wider geopolitical agenda. The image of the hydra – a voracious and vicious multi- headed beast, guided by a single mind, and which grows • As well as espionage, Moscow’s “special services” new heads as soon as one is lopped off – crops up frequently conduct active measures aimed at subverting in discussions of Russia’s intelligence and security services. and destabilising European governments, Murdered dissident Alexander Litvinenko and his co-author operations in support of Russian economic Yuri Felshtinsky wrote of the way “the old KGB, like some interests, and attacks on political enemies. multi-headed hydra, split into four new structures” after 1991.2 More recently, a British counterintelligence officer • Moscow has developed an array of overlapping described Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) as and competitive security and spy services. The a hydra because of the way that, for every plot foiled or aim is to encourage risk-taking and multiple operative expelled, more quickly appear. sources, but it also leads to turf wars and a tendency to play to Kremlin prejudices. The West finds itself in a new “hot peace” in which many consider Russia not just as an irritant or challenge, but • While much useful intelligence is collected, as an outright threat.
    [Show full text]
  • CIA Best Practices in Counterinsurgency
    CIA Best Practices in Counterinsurgency WikiLeaks release: December 18, 2014 Keywords: CIA, counterinsurgency, HVT, HVD, Afghanistan, Algeria, Colombia, Iraq, Israel, Peru, Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, Chechnya, Libya, Pakistan, Thailand,HAMAS, FARC, PULO, AQI, FLN, IRA, PLO, LTTE, al-Qa‘ida, Taliban, drone, assassination Restraint: SECRET//NOFORN (no foreign nationals) Title: Best Practices in Counterinsurgency: Making High-Value Targeting Operations an Effective Counterinsurgency Tool Date: July 07, 2009 Organisation: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Author: CIA Office of Transnational Issues; Conflict, Governance, and Society Group Link: http://wikileaks.org/cia-hvt-counterinsurgency Pages: 21 Description This is a secret CIA document assessing high-value targeting (HVT) programs world-wide for their impact on insurgencies. The document is classified SECRET//NOFORN (no foreign nationals) and is for internal use to review the positive and negative implications of targeted assassinations on these groups for the strength of the group post the attack. The document assesses attacks on insurgent groups by the United States and other countries within Afghanistan, Algeria, Colombia, Iraq, Israel, Peru, Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, Chechnya, Libya, Pakistan and Thailand. The document, which is "pro-assassination", was completed in July 2009 and coincides with the first year of the Obama administration and Leon Panetta's directorship of the CIA during which the United States very significantly increased its CIA assassination program at the
    [Show full text]
  • Severn House Paperbacks Spring 2021
    SEVERN HOUSE PUBLISHERS Hitmen I Have Known Bill James In the 35th installment of the popular Harpur and Iles police procedural series, tensions in the community are mounting following the gruesome deaths of two men. Alarmingly, suspicion falls on Assistant Chief Constable Iles. He seems at ease with the accusations, as are his superiors in the police f... Summary Assistant Chief Constable Iles finds himself suspected of murder in the fast-paced 35th installment of the popular Harpur and Iles police procedural series. Tensions in the community are mounting following the gruesome deaths of two men, both of whom were accused yet acquitted of the murder of an undercover police officer. It looks like vigilante justice, but who is responsible? Alarmingly, suspicion falls on Assistant Chief Constable Iles. Severn House Publishers 9781847519900 Matters escalate when a TV show investigating the murders is aired, further implicating Iles. Iles seems at Pub Date: 1/26/21 ease with the accusations, as are his superiors in the police force. But others are not feeling so secure. $17.95 USD/$19.95 CAD Trade Paperback Local crime bosses Ralph Ember and Mansel Shale fear reprisals against Iles will result in their own businesses 192 Pages Carton Qty: 38 suffering. And so they begin to plan how to remove potential troublemakers from their path . Fiction / Mystery & Detective Contributor Bio FIC022020 Critically acclaimed crime writer Bill James is a former journalist who wrote for The Sunday Times, Daily Series: A Harpur and Iles Mirror, Spectator, New Review and Punch. Married with four children, he lives in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Offensive Capabilities
    GCHQ and UK Mass Surveillance Chapter 5 5 Beyond signals intelligence: Offensive capabilities 5.1 Introduction Documents released by German magazine Der Spiegel provide a much richer picture of the offensive activities of the NSA and its allies, including the UK’s GCHQ.i The global surveillance infrastructure and hacking tools described in the previous chapters are not only used for obtaining information to be fed into intelligence reports and tracking terrorists. The agencies are also developing cyber-warfare capabilities, with the NSA taking the lead within the US armed forces. This militarisation of the internet saw U.S. intelligence services carried out 231 offensive cyber-operations in 2011ii. The UK's National Strategic Defence and Security Review from 2010 made hostile attacks upon UK cyberspace a major priorityiii. It is fair to assume that many countries are following suit and building cyber-warfare capabilities. Der Spiegel terms the development of these aggressive hacking tools as Digital Weapons. In their view D weapons which should join the ABC (Atomic, Biological and Chemical) weapons of the 20th century because of their indiscriminate nature. Here lies a fundamental problem. The modern world with connected global communications networks means that non-state actors such as civilians and businesses are now affected by the agencies’ activities much more frequently than before. The internet is used by everyone – cyberspace is mainly a civilian space – and the opportunity for collateral damage is huge. The papers leaked to Der Spiegel appear to show that signal agencies have little regard for the security and wellbeing of anyone who gets caught in the path of their operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Race in the Age of Obama Making America More Competitive
    american academy of arts & sciences summer 2011 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxiv, no. 4 Race in the Age of Obama Gerald Early, Jeffrey B. Ferguson, Korina Jocson, and David A. Hollinger Making America More Competitive, Innovative, and Healthy Harvey V. Fineberg, Cherry A. Murray, and Charles M. Vest ALSO: Social Science and the Alternative Energy Future Philanthropy in Public Education Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences Reflections: John Lithgow Breaking the Code Around the Country Upcoming Events Induction Weekend–Cambridge September 30– Welcome Reception for New Members October 1–Induction Ceremony October 2– Symposium: American Institutions and a Civil Society Partial List of Speakers: David Souter (Supreme Court of the United States), Maj. Gen. Gregg Martin (United States Army War College), and David M. Kennedy (Stanford University) OCTOBER NOVEMBER 25th 12th Stated Meeting–Stanford Stated Meeting–Chicago in collaboration with the Chicago Humanities Perspectives on the Future of Nuclear Power Festival after Fukushima WikiLeaks and the First Amendment Introduction: Scott D. Sagan (Stanford Introduction: John A. Katzenellenbogen University) (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) Speakers: Wael Al Assad (League of Arab Speakers: Geoffrey R. Stone (University of States) and Jayantha Dhanapala (Pugwash Chicago Law School), Richard A. Posner (U.S. Conferences on Science and World Affairs) Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit), 27th Judith Miller (formerly of The New York Times), Stated Meeting–Berkeley and Gabriel Schoenfeld (Hudson Institute; Healing the Troubled American Economy Witherspoon Institute) Introduction: Robert J. Birgeneau (Univer- DECEMBER sity of California, Berkeley) 7th Speakers: Christina Romer (University of Stated Meeting–Stanford California, Berkeley) and David H.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Surveillance
    Mass Surveillance Mass Surveillance What are the risks for the citizens and the opportunities for the European Information Society? What are the possible mitigation strategies? Part 1 - Risks and opportunities raised by the current generation of network services and applications Study IP/G/STOA/FWC-2013-1/LOT 9/C5/SC1 January 2015 PE 527.409 STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The STOA project “Mass Surveillance Part 1 – Risks, Opportunities and Mitigation Strategies” was carried out by TECNALIA Research and Investigation in Spain. AUTHORS Arkaitz Gamino Garcia Concepción Cortes Velasco Eider Iturbe Zamalloa Erkuden Rios Velasco Iñaki Eguía Elejabarrieta Javier Herrera Lotero Jason Mansell (Linguistic Review) José Javier Larrañeta Ibañez Stefan Schuster (Editor) The authors acknowledge and would like to thank the following experts for their contributions to this report: Prof. Nigel Smart, University of Bristol; Matteo E. Bonfanti PhD, Research Fellow in International Law and Security, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna Pisa; Prof. Fred Piper, University of London; Caspar Bowden, independent privacy researcher; Maria Pilar Torres Bruna, Head of Cybersecurity, Everis Aerospace, Defense and Security; Prof. Kenny Paterson, University of London; Agustín Martin and Luis Hernández Encinas, Tenured Scientists, Department of Information Processing and Cryptography (Cryptology and Information Security Group), CSIC; Alessandro Zanasi, Zanasi & Partners; Fernando Acero, Expert on Open Source Software; Luigi Coppolino,Università degli Studi di Napoli; Marcello Antonucci, EZNESS srl; Rachel Oldroyd, Managing Editor of The Bureau of Investigative Journalism; Peter Kruse, Founder of CSIS Security Group A/S; Ryan Gallagher, investigative Reporter of The Intercept; Capitán Alberto Redondo, Guardia Civil; Prof. Bart Preneel, KU Leuven; Raoul Chiesa, Security Brokers SCpA, CyberDefcon Ltd.; Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the American Surveillance State
    IN DEFENSE OF THE AMERICAN SURVEILLANCE STATE Dr. Gabriel Schoenfeld* ABSTRACT The term “American surveillance state” is something that has come into use by fierce critics of U.S. government counterterrorism efforts, efforts that necessarily contain surveillance as a critical element. A body of opinion has emerged arguing that thanks to the ubiquitous eyes of the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, and thanks also to the widespread distribution of myriad new forms of surveillance technology, privacy in America is being destroyed and George Orwell’s dark vision of Big Brother is on its way to realization. This Article rejects this characterization, and asserts that current counterterrorism efforts are an effective and appropriate response to ongoing threats. While history teaches us the government may at times overstep its bounds, even in today’s current national security climate the U.S. government’s approach is less intrusive than it has been in the past and is critical for protecting the safety of the American people. ARTICLE The term “American surveillance state” is something that has come into use by fierce critics of U.S. government counterterrorism efforts, efforts that necessarily contain surveillance as a critical element.1 A body of opinion has emerged arguing that thanks to the ubiquitous eyes of the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, and thanks also to the widespread distribution of myriad new forms of surveillance technology, privacy in America is being destroyed and George Orwell’s dark vision of Big Brother is on its way to realization.2 * Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Journal of Strategic Security Volume 3 Number 1 Volume 3, No. 1: March 2010 Article 8 Book Reviews Timothy Hsia Sheldon Greaves Donald J. Goldstein Henley-Putnam University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, National Security Law Commons, and the Portfolio and Security Analysis Commons pp. 71-78 Recommended Citation Hsia, Timothy; Greaves, Sheldon; and Goldstein, Donald J.. "Book Reviews." Journal of Strategic Security 3, no. 1 (2010) : 71-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.3.1.7 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol3/iss1/8 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Strategic Security by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Reviews This book review is available in Journal of Strategic Security: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/ vol3/iss1/8 Hsia et al.: Book Reviews Book Reviews The History of Camp Tracy: Japanese WWII POWs and the Future of Strategic Interrogation. By Alexander D. Corbin. Fort Belvoir, VA: Ziedon Press, 2009. ISBN: 978-0-578-02979- 5. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. 189. $15.95. The History of Camp Tracy, which received the Joint Chiefs of Staff His- tory Office's Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz Archival Research Award, is an illuminating and educating read. The book is written by Alexander Corbin, an intelligence officer in the U.S.
    [Show full text]