Research Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Paper Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. hip65426_shine_revised_shortcorr c ESO 2017 July 6, 2017 Discovery of a warm, dusty giant planet around HIP 65426 ? G. Chauvin1; 2, S. Desidera3, A.-M. Lagrange1, A. Vigan4, R. Gratton3, M. Langlois4; 5, M. Bonnefoy1, J.-L. Beuzit1, M. Feldt6, D. Mouillet1, M. Meyer7; 8, A. Cheetham9, B. Biller6; 10, A. Boccaletti11, V. D’Orazi3, R. Galicher11, J. Hagelberg1, A.-L. Maire6, D. Mesa3, J. Olofsson6; 12, M. Samland6, T.O.B. Schmidt11, E. Sissa3, M. Bonavita3; 10, B. Charnay11, M. Cudel1, S. Daemgen7, P. Delorme1, P. Janin-Potiron13, M. Janson6; 14, M. Keppler6, H. Le Coroller4, R. Ligi4, G.D. Marleau6; 15, S. Messina3; 16, P. Mollière6, C. Mordasini6; 15, A. Müller6, S. Peretti9, C. Perrot11, L. Rodet1, D. Rouan11, A. Zurlo3; 17, C. Dominik18, T. Henning6, F. Menard1, H.-M. Schmid7, M. Turatto3, S. Udry9, F. Vakili13, L. Abe13, J. Antichi19, A. Baruffolo3, P. Baudoz11, J. Baudrand11, P. Blanchard4, A. Bazzon7, T. Buey11, M. Carbillet13, M. Carle4, J. Charton1, E. Cascone20, R. Claudi3, A. Costille4, A. Deboulbe1, V. De Caprio20, K. Dohlen4, D. Fantinel3, P. Feautrier1, T. Fusco21, P. Gigan11, E. Giro3, D. Gisler7, L. Gluck1, N. Hubin22, E. Hugot4, M. Jaquet4, M. Kasper22, F. Madec4, Y. Magnard,1, P. Martinez13, D. Maurel1, D. Le Mignant4, O. Möller-Nilsson6, M. Llored4, T. Moulin1, A. Origné4, A. Pavlov6, D. Perret11, C. Petit21, J. Pragt23, P. Puget1, P. Rabou1, J. Ramos6, R. Rigal18, S. Rochat1, R. Roelfsema23, G. Rousset11, A. Roux1, B. Salasnich3, J.-F. Sauvage21, A. Sevin11, C. Soenke22, E. Stadler1, M. Suarez19, L. Weber9, F. Wildi9, S. Antoniucci24, J.-C. Augereau1, J.-L. Baudino11; 25, W. Brandner6, N. Engler7, J. Girard1; 26, C. Gry4, Q. Kral11; 27, T. Kopytova6; 28, E. Lagadec13, J. Milli1; 26, C. Moutou4; 29, J. Schlieder6; 30, J. Szulágyi7, C. Thalmann7, Z. Wahhaj4; 26 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received May 10th, 2017 ABSTRACT Aims. The SHINE program is a large high-contrast near-infrared survey of 600 young, nearby stars. It is aimed at searching for and characterizing new planetary systems using VLT/SPHERE’s unprecedented high-contrast and high-angular resolution imaging capabilities. It also intends at placing statistical constraints on the occurrence and orbital properties of the giant planet population at large orbits as a function of the stellar host mass and age to test planet formation theories. Methods. We use the IRDIS dual-band imager and the IFS integral field spectrograph of SPHERE to acquire high-constrast coronagraphic differ- ential near-infrared images and spectra of the young A2 star HIP 65426. It is a member of the ∼ 17 Myr old Lower Centaurus-Crux association. Results. At a separation of 830 mas (92 au projected) from the star, we detect a faint red companion. Multi-epoch observations confirm that it shares common proper motion with HIP 65426. Spectro-photometric measurements extracted with IFS and IRDIS between 0.95 and 2.2 µm indicate a warm, dusty atmosphere characteristic of young low surface-gravity L5-L7 dwarfs. Hot-start evolutionary models predict a luminosity consistent with a 6 − 12 MJup, Teff = 1300 − 1600 K and R = 1:5 ± 0:1 RJup giant planet. Finally, the comparison with Exo-REM and PHOENIX BT-Settl synthetic atmosphere models gives consistent effective temperatures but with slightly higher surface gravity solutions of log(g) = 4:0−5:0 with smaller radii (1:0 − 1:3 RJup). Conclusions. Given its physical and spectral properties, HIP 65426 b occupies a rather unique placement in terms of age, mass and spectral-type among the currently known imaged planets. It represents a particularly interesting case to study the presence of clouds as a function of particle size, composition, and location in the atmosphere, to search for signatures of non-equilibrium chemistry, and finally to test the theory of planet formation and evolution. Key words. Techniques: Imaging and spectroscopy - Star: HIP65426 - Planets and Satellites: detection, fundamental parameters, atmospheres 1. Introduction systems with coronagraphic and differential imaging techniques. They offer unprecedented detection, astrometric and spectropho- More than a decade of direct imaging surveys targeting several tometric capabilities which allow us to discover and charac- arXiv:1707.01413v1 [astro-ph.EP] 5 Jul 2017 hundreds of young, nearby stars have revealed that the occur- terize fainter and closer giant planets like the recent discovery rence of giant planets at wide orbits (≥ 20 − 40 au) is relatively of 51 Eri b (2 MJup at 14 au, T5-type, of age 20 Myr; Macin- low (e.g Bowler 2016). Despite the relatively small number of tosh et al. 2015; Samland et al. 2017). The SHINE (SpHere discoveries compared with other techniques like radial velocity INfrared survey for Exoplanets) survey aims at imaging 600 and transit, each new imaged giant planet has brought unique young, nearby stars as part of the SPHERE Guaranteed Time clues on the formation, evolution and physics of young Jupiters. Observations. In this survey, we observed the close environment The latest generation of planet imagers, SPHERE (Beuzit et al. of the young, star HIP 65426. The deep coronographic near- 2008), GPI (Macintosh et al. 2014) and SCExAO (Jovanovic infrared observations revealed the presence of a young, warm, et al. 2016), now combine innovative extreme adaptive optics and dusty L5-L7 massive jovian planet, hereafter HIP 65426 b, ? located at about 92 au (projected distance). We describe below Based on observations collected at La Silla and Paranal Observa- the observing set-up and data reduction, the physical properties tory, ESO (Chile) Program ID: 097.C-0865 and 098.C-0209 (SPHERE). Article number, page 1 of 10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. hip65426_shine_revised_shortcorr of HIP 65426 b, and finally discuss this new discovery in com- Table E.1 of App. E. To calibrate the IRDIS and IFS datasets, an parison to other imaged planetary systems and current planet for- astrometric field 47 Tuc was observed. The platescale and True mation and evolution theories. North solution at each epoch are reported in Table E.1. They are derived from the long-term analysis of the SHINE astrometric calibration described by Maire et al. (2016). 2. Host star properties All IRDIS and IFS datasets were reduced at the SPHERE 2 HIP 65426 is an A2-type (H = 6:853 ± 0:049 mag, Cutri et al. Data Center (DC) using the SPHERE Data Reduction and Han- 2003; d = 111:4 ± 3:8 pc, Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016) mem- dling (DRH) automated pipeline (Pavlov et al. 2008). Basic cor- ber of the Lower Centaurus-Crux (hereafter LCC) association rections for bad pixels, dark current, flat field were applied. For (de Zeeuw et al. 1999; Rizzuto et al. 2011). A detailed summary IFS, the SPHERE-DC complemented the DRH pipeline with ad- of the main stellar properties as found in the literature is given ditional steps that improve the wavelength calibration and the in App. A. To refine them, the star was observed with HARPS cross-talk and bad pixel correction (Mesa et al. 2015). The prod- (Mayor et al. 2003) on January 16th, 17th and 18th, 20171. ucts were then used as input of the SHINE Specal pipeline We measured the stellar absolute radial and projected rotational which applies anamorphism correction and flux normalization, velocities using a custom cross-correlation function procedure followed by applying different angular and spectral differential specifically tailored for fast-rotating early-type stars. Respective imaging algorithms (Galicher et al. 2017, in prep). For the Febru- −1 −1 values of Vrad = 5:2 ± 1:3 km.s and v sin i = 299 ± 9 km.s ary 7th 2017 and February 9th 2017 datasets, we took advan- were found (App. B). A marginally significant radial velocity tage of the waffle-spot registration to apply a frame-to-frame re- difference was found between the three epochs. This proba- centering. The TLOCI (Marois et al. 2014) and PCA (Soummer bly arose from stellar pulsations as suggested by the period- et al. 2012; Amara & Quanz 2012) algorithms were specifically icity (P ∼ 0:135 days) found from the Hipparcos photomet- used on angular differential imaging data (i.e without applying ric time series. HIP 65426 is one of the fastest rotators known any combined spectral differential processing) given the rela- with similar spectral type (Zorec & Royer 2012) and is there- tively good SNR (10 − 30 in the individual IFS channels, ≥ 50 fore likely viewed along mid- to high-inclinations with respect with IRDIS) detection of cc-0. Its position and spectra were ex- to the rotation axis. Given its spectral type, the observed colors tracted using injected fake planets and planetary signature tem- of HIP 65426 suggest a small value of reddening consistent with plates to take into account any biases related to the data pro- Chen et al. (2012). Assuming a metallicity for the LCC that is cessing. Both algorithms gave consistent results. The resulting close to solar (Viana Almeida et al. 2009), theoretical isochrones extracted TLOCI images from IFS and IRDIS for the February predict an age of 14±4 Myr for LCC members in the vicinity 7th, 2017 epoch are shown in Figure 1. of HIP 65426 (see App. A). SPHERE and HARPS observations do not show evidence of binarity (App. C). Finally, according to Chen et al. (2012), no IR excess is reported for this star. Our own SED analysis confirms this finding with only a tentative marginal excess at WISE W4 (see App. D). 3. Observations and data reduction HIP 65426 was observed on May 30th, 2016 under unstable con- ditions (strong wind) with SPHERE. The observations were then repeated on June 26th, 2016. The data were acquired in IRDIFS pupil-tracking mode with the 185 mas diameter apodized-Lyot coronograph (Carbillet et al.
Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Livre-Ovni.Pdf
    UN MONDE BIZARRE Le livre des étranges Objets Volants Non Identifiés Chapitre 1 Paranormal Le paranormal est un terme utilisé pour qualifier un en- mé n'est pas considéré comme paranormal par les semble de phénomènes dont les causes ou mécanismes neuroscientifiques) ; ne sont apparemment pas explicables par des lois scien- tifiques établies. Le préfixe « para » désignant quelque • Les différents moyens de communication avec les chose qui est à côté de la norme, la norme étant ici le morts : naturels (médiumnité, nécromancie) ou ar- consensus scientifique d'une époque. Un phénomène est tificiels (la transcommunication instrumentale telle qualifié de paranormal lorsqu'il ne semble pas pouvoir que les voix électroniques); être expliqué par les lois naturelles connues, laissant ain- si le champ libre à de nouvelles recherches empiriques, à • Les apparitions de l'au-delà (fantômes, revenants, des interprétations, à des suppositions et à l'imaginaire. ectoplasmes, poltergeists, etc.) ; Les initiateurs de la parapsychologie se sont donné comme objectif d'étudier d'une manière scientifique • la cryptozoologie (qui étudie l'existence d'espèce in- ce qu'ils considèrent comme des perceptions extra- connues) : classification assez injuste, car l'objet de sensorielles et de la psychokinèse. Malgré l'existence de la cryptozoologie est moins de cultiver les mythes laboratoires de parapsychologie dans certaines universi- que de chercher s’il y a ou non une espèce animale tés, notamment en Grande-Bretagne, le paranormal est inconnue réelle derrière une légende ; généralement considéré comme un sujet d'étude peu sé- rieux. Il est en revanche parfois associé a des activités • Le phénomène ovni et ses dérivés (cercle de culture).
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
    geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Mètodes De Detecció I Anàlisi D'exoplanetes
    MÈTODES DE DETECCIÓ I ANÀLISI D’EXOPLANETES Rubén Soussé Villa 2n de Batxillerat Tutora: Dolors Romero IES XXV Olimpíada 13/1/2011 Mètodes de detecció i anàlisi d’exoplanetes . Índex - Introducció ............................................................................................. 5 [ Marc Teòric ] 1. L’Univers ............................................................................................... 6 1.1 Les estrelles .................................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Vida de les estrelles .............................................................. 7 1.1.2 Classes espectrals .................................................................9 1.1.3 Magnitud ........................................................................... 9 1.2 Sistemes planetaris: El Sistema Solar .............................................. 10 1.2.1 Formació ......................................................................... 11 1.2.2 Planetes .......................................................................... 13 2. Planetes extrasolars ............................................................................ 19 2.1 Denominació .............................................................................. 19 2.2 Història dels exoplanetes .............................................................. 20 2.3 Mètodes per detectar-los i saber-ne les característiques ..................... 26 2.3.1 Oscil·lació Doppler ........................................................... 27 2.3.2 Trànsits
    [Show full text]
  • Planets and Exoplanets
    NASE Publications Planets and exoplanets Planets and exoplanets Rosa M. Ros, Hans Deeg International Astronomical Union, Technical University of Catalonia (Spain), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias and University of La Laguna (Spain) Summary This workshop provides a series of activities to compare the many observed properties (such as size, distances, orbital speeds and escape velocities) of the planets in our Solar System. Each section provides context to various planetary data tables by providing demonstrations or calculations to contrast the properties of the planets, giving the students a concrete sense for what the data mean. At present, several methods are used to find exoplanets, more or less indirectly. It has been possible to detect nearly 4000 planets, and about 500 systems with multiple planets. Objetives - Understand what the numerical values in the Solar Sytem summary data table mean. - Understand the main characteristics of extrasolar planetary systems by comparing their properties to the orbital system of Jupiter and its Galilean satellites. The Solar System By creating scale models of the Solar System, the students will compare the different planetary parameters. To perform these activities, we will use the data in Table 1. Planets Diameter (km) Distance to Sun (km) Sun 1 392 000 Mercury 4 878 57.9 106 Venus 12 180 108.3 106 Earth 12 756 149.7 106 Marte 6 760 228.1 106 Jupiter 142 800 778.7 106 Saturn 120 000 1 430.1 106 Uranus 50 000 2 876.5 106 Neptune 49 000 4 506.6 106 Table 1: Data of the Solar System bodies In all cases, the main goal of the model is to make the data understandable.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmation of the First Image of an Extra-Solar Planet
    ets. First investigations show that Earth-like leading to a total observing time of 5 hours REFERENCES planets around bright stars could be detected, to obtain a single data point with 1 cms–1 pho- Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., Winisdoerffer, provided that the total integration time is kept ton limited error. An improved version of the C., 2005, A&A 434, 343 Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier et al. 2004, A&A sufficiently long (~ hours) to average out the HARPS spectrograph at the VLT as a new- 419, L13 stellar oscillations. A number of studies have generation spectrograph seems more appro- Boss, A. 2002, ApJ 566, 472 been started to investigate the instrumental priate for this kind of science. In addition, Bouchy, F., Bazot, M., Santos, N. C. et al. 2005, aspects. HARPS may serve in this context as it would represent an ideal intermediate A&A, submitted, astro-ph/0504043 a test bench for attaining extremely high radi- step toward CODEX. With the refinement Butler, P. et al. 2004, ApJ 617, 580 Mc Arthur, B. et al. 2004, ApJ 614,81 al-velocity precision. Indeed, new instru- of HARPS and the possible future with Ida, S., Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ 604, 388 mental concepts, and new calibration tech- CODEX, the Doppler technique promi- Lovis, C., Mayor, M., Bouchy, F. 2005, in press, niques and algorithms are being explored and ses us many new exciting discoveries and astro-ph/0503660 could partially be verified on HARPS on the new knowledge in the domain of extra-solar Monnet, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 Star Distance Star Name Star Mass
    exoplanet.eu_catalog star_distance star_name star_mass Planet name mass 1.3 Proxima Centauri 0.120 Proxima Cen b 0.004 1.3 alpha Cen B 0.934 alf Cen B b 0.004 2.3 WISE 0855-0714 WISE 0855-0714 6.000 2.6 Lalande 21185 0.460 Lalande 21185 b 0.012 3.2 eps Eridani 0.830 eps Eridani b 3.090 3.4 Ross 128 0.168 Ross 128 b 0.004 3.6 GJ 15 A 0.375 GJ 15 A b 0.017 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet d 0.004 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet c 0.003 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet b 0.002 3.6 eps Ind A 0.762 eps Ind A b 2.710 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet e 0.012 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet f 0.012 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet h 0.006 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet g 0.006 3.8 GJ 273 0.290 GJ 273 b 0.009 3.8 GJ 273 0.290 GJ 273 c 0.004 3.9 Kapteyn's 0.281 Kapteyn's c 0.022 3.9 Kapteyn's 0.281 Kapteyn's b 0.015 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 d 0.024 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 c 0.011 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 b 0.006 4.5 GJ 687 0.413 GJ 687 b 0.058 4.5 GJ 674 0.350 GJ 674 b 0.040 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 b 1.938 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 c 0.856 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 e 0.045 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 d 0.022 4.9 GJ 832 0.450 GJ 832 b 0.689 4.9 GJ 832 0.450 GJ 832 c 0.016 5.9 GJ 570 ABC 0.802 GJ 570 D 42.500 6.0 SIMP0136+0933 SIMP0136+0933 12.700 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 e 0.015 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 d 0.011 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 b 0.009 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 b 0.050 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 c 0.017 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 e 0.006 6.5 GJ 625 0.300 GJ 625 b 0.010 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 h 0.280 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 e 0.200 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 d 0.067 6.6 HD 219134 HD
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanetary Atmospheres
    Exoplanetary Atmospheres Nikku Madhusudhan1,2, Heather Knutson3, Jonathan J. Fortney4, Travis Barman5,6 The study of exoplanetary atmospheres is one of the most exciting and dynamic frontiers in astronomy. Over the past two decades ongoing surveys have revealed an astonishing diversity in the planetary masses, radii, temperatures, orbital parameters, and host stellar properties of exo- planetary systems. We are now moving into an era where we can begin to address fundamental questions concerning the diversity of exoplanetary compositions, atmospheric and interior processes, and formation histories, just as have been pursued for solar system planets over the past century. Exoplanetary atmospheres provide a direct means to address these questions via their observable spectral signatures. In the last decade, and particularly in the last five years, tremendous progress has been made in detecting atmospheric signatures of exoplanets through photometric and spectroscopic methods using a variety of space-borne and/or ground-based observational facilities. These observations are beginning to provide important constraints on a wide gamut of atmospheric properties, including pressure-temperature profiles, chemical compositions, energy circulation, presence of clouds, and non-equilibrium processes. The latest studies are also beginning to connect the inferred chemical compositions to exoplanetary formation conditions. In the present chapter, we review the most recent developments in the area of exoplanetary atmospheres. Our review covers advances in both observations and theory of exoplanetary atmospheres, and spans a broad range of exoplanet types (gas giants, ice giants, and super-Earths) and detection methods (transiting planets, direct imaging, and radial velocity). A number of upcoming planet-finding surveys will focus on detecting exoplanets orbiting nearby bright stars, which are the best targets for detailed atmospheric characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Young Jupiters Down to the Snowline A
    SPHERE+: Imaging young Jupiters down to the snowline A. Boccaletti, G. Chauvin, D. Mouillet, O. Absil, F. Allard, S. Antoniucci, J.-C. Augereau, P. Barge, A. Baruffolo, J.-L. Baudino, et al. To cite this version: A. Boccaletti, G. Chauvin, D. Mouillet, O. Absil, F. Allard, et al.. SPHERE+: Imaging young Jupiters down to the snowline. 2020. hal-03020449 HAL Id: hal-03020449 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03020449 Preprint submitted on 13 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SPHERE+ Imaging young Jupiters down to the snowline White book submitted to ESO, Feb. 2020 A. Boccaletti1, G. Chauvin2, D. Mouillet2, O. Absil3, F. Allard4, S. Antoniucci5, J.-C. Augereau2, P. Barge6, A. Baruffolo7, J.-L. Baudino8, P. Baudoz1, M. Beaulieu9, M. Benisty2, J.-L. Beuzit6, A. Bianco10, B. Biller11, B. Bonavita11, M. Bonnefoy2, S. Bos15, J.-C. Bouret6, W. Brandner12, N. Buchschache13, B. Carry9, F. Cantalloube12, E. Cascone14, A. Carlotti2, B. Charnay1, A. Chiavassa9, E. Choquet6, Y. Clenet´ 1, A. Crida9, J. De Boer15, V. De Caprio14, S. Desidera7, J.-M. Desert16, J.-B. Delisle13, P. Delorme2, K. Dohlen6, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Atmosphere Measurements from Direct Imaging
    Exoplanet Atmosphere Measurements from Direct Imaging Beth A. Biller and Mickael¨ Bonnefoy Abstract In the last decade, about a dozen giant exoplanets have been directly im- aged in the IR as companions to young stars. With photometry and spectroscopy of these planets in hand from new extreme coronagraphic instruments such as SPHERE at VLT and GPI at Gemini, we are beginning to characterize and classify the at- mospheres of these objects. Initially, it was assumed that young planets would be similar to field brown dwarfs, more massive objects that nonetheless share sim- ilar effective temperatures and compositions. Surprisingly, young planets appear considerably redder than field brown dwarfs, likely a result of their low surface gravities and indicating much different atmospheric structures. Preliminarily, young free-floating planets appear to be as or more variable than field brown dwarfs, due to rotational modulation of inhomogeneous surface features. Eventually, such inho- mogeneity will allow the top of atmosphere structure of these objects to be mapped via Doppler imaging on extremely large telescopes. Direct imaging spectroscopy of giant exoplanets now is a prelude for the study of habitable zone planets. Even- tual direct imaging spectroscopy of a large sample of habitable zone planets with future telescopes such as LUVOIR will be necessary to identify multiple biosigna- tures and establish habitability for Earth-mass exoplanets in the habitable zones of nearby stars. Introduction Since 1995, more than 3000 exoplanets have been discovered, mostly via indirect means, ushering in a completely new field of astronomy. In the last decade, about a dozen planets have been directly imaged, including archetypical systems such as arXiv:1807.05136v1 [astro-ph.EP] 13 Jul 2018 Beth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry on Gliese 229B with Observed Abundance (Cf
    Atmospheric Chemistry on Substellar Objects Channon Visscher Lunar and Planetary Institute, USRA UHCL Spring Seminar Series 2010 Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt Outline • introduction to substellar objects; recent discoveries – what can exoplanets tell us about the formation and evolution of planetary systems? • clouds and chemistry in substellar atmospheres – role of thermochemistry and disequilibrium processes • Jupiter’s bulk water inventory • chemical regimes on brown dwarfs and exoplanets • understanding the underlying physics and chemistry in substellar atmospheres is essential for guiding, interpreting, and explaining astronomical observations of these objects Methods of inquiry • telescopic observations (Hubble, Spitzer, Kepler, etc) • spacecraft exploration (Voyager, Galileo, Cassini, etc) • assume same physical principles apply throughout universe • allows the use of models to interpret observations A simple model; Ike vs. the Great Red Spot Field of study • stars: • sustained H fusion • spectral classes OBAFGKM • > 75 MJup (0.07 MSun) • substellar objects: • brown dwarfs (~750) • temporary D fusion • spectral classes L and T • 13 to 75 MJup • planets (~450) • no fusion • < 13 MJup Field of study • Sun (5800 K), M (3200-2300 K), L (2500-1400 K), T (1400-700 K), Jupiter (124 K) • upper atmospheres of substellar objects are cool enough for interesting chemistry! substellar objects Dr. Robert Hurt, Infrared Processing and Analysis Center Worlds without end… • prehistory: (Earth), Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn • 1400 BC: Mercury
    [Show full text]