DOCSLIB.ORG

CAMPANULACEAE ENDÉMICAS DEL PERÚ © Facultad De Ciencias Biológicas UNMSM Versión Online ISSN 1727-9933

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAMPANULACEAE ENDÉMICAS DEL PERÚ © Facultad De Ciencias Biológicas UNMSM Versión Online ISSN 1727-9933 Rev. peru. biol. Número especial 13(2): 237s - 241s (Diciembre 2006) El libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Perú. Ed.: Blanca León et al. CAMPANULACEAE ENDÉMICAS DEL PERÚ © Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas UNMSM Versión Online ISSN 1727-9933 Campanulaceae endémicas del Perú Blanca León 1,2 y Thomas Lammers 3 1 Museo de Historia Natural, Resumen Av. Arenales 1256, Aptdo. 14-0434, Lima 14, Perú La familia Campanulaceae es reconocida en el Perú por presentar 11 géneros y alrede- 2 Plant Resources Center, dor de 180 especies (Brako & Zarucchi, 1993; Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2004), principalmente University of Texas at arbustos y hierbas. En este trabajo reconocemos 32 especies endémicas en tres géne- Austin, Austin TX 78712 ros, incluidas en su mayoría en los géneros Siphocampylus y Centropogon. Los taxones EE.UU. endémicos se encuentran principalmente en la región Bosques Muy Húmedos Montanos, [email protected] entre los 800 y 3600 m de altitud. Se aplicaron las categorías y criterios de la UICN a 23 3 University of Wisconsin especies. Nueve especies endémicas se encuentran representadas dentro del Sistema Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado. 54901, EE.UU. [email protected] Palabras claves: Campanulaceae, Siphocampylus, Centropogon, Perú, endemismo, plantas endémicas. Abstract The Campanulaceae are represented in Peru by 11 genera and around 180 species (Brako & Zarucchi, 1993; Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2004), mainly shrubs and herbs. Here we recognize 32 endemic species in three genera. Siphocampylus and Centropogon account for the largest number of endemic species. Endemic Campanulaceae are found mostly in the Very Humid Montane Forests region, between 800 and 3600 m elevation. We applied IUCN categories and criteria to 23 species. Nine endemic species have been recorded within the Peruvian parks system. Keywords: Campanulaceae, Siphocampylus, Centropogon, Peru, endemism, endemic species. 1. Centropogon david-smithii Lammers 3. Centropogon dillonii Lammers NE EN, B1ab(iii) Publicación: Brittonia 50(2): 255—256, Publicación: Brittonia 50(2): 243—245, f. 7 A-B. 1998. f. 3 A-B. 1998. Colección tipo: D.N. Smith 8184 Colección tipo: M.O. Dillon et al. 6117 Herbarios: F, MO; AMAZ!, USM. Herbarios: F, MO; CPUN. Nombre común: Desconocido. Nombre común: Desconocido. Registro departamental: PA. Registro departamental: CA. Regiones Ecológicas: BMHM; 3150 m. Regiones Ecológicas: BMHM; 2300— SINANPE: PNYC 2500 m. Herbarios peruanos: AMAZ (isotipo), SINANPE: PNC USM (isotipo citado). Herbarios peruanos: CPUN (isotipo citado). Observaciones: Esta especie se conoce solamente de una localidad, Observaciones: Esta especie tiene vínculos con Centropogon gesneriiformis ubicada en el Parque Nacional Yanachaga-Chemillén. Lammers de Ecuador, pero se distingue de ella por sus hojas de márgenes enteros (1998) indicó la cercanía de esta especie con otra endémica peruana, y sus flores anaranjadas (vs. rosadas). Las poblaciones conocidas están http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVRevistas/biologia/biologiaNEW Centropogon isabellinus, de la que se diferencia por bracteolas pequeñas ubicadas en el área del Parque Nacional Cutervo; sin embargo las amenazas y un estrechamiento del tubo floral. Con mayor exploración de los asociadas a la deforestación en este Parque son muy altas y que bosques montanos pueda conocerse el área de esta especie. comprometerían a las poblaciones que en ella habitan. 2. Centropogon dianae Lammers 4. Centropogon eilersii Lammers & M.O. Dillon NE Publicación: Brittonia 50(2): 257—258, Publicación: Novon 12(2): 218—219, f. f. 7 C-D. 1998. 9. 2002. Colección tipo: L. van der Hoogte & C. Colección tipo: M. Weigend & K. Weigend Roersch 1213 2000/441 Herbarios: MO. Herbarios: NY. Nombre común: Desconocido. Nombre común: Desconocido. Registro departamental: CU. Registro departamental: CU. Regiones Ecológicas: MA; 3000—3415 Regiones Ecológicas: BMHM; 2600— m. 2900 m. SINANPE: Sin registro. SINANPE: Sin registro. Herbarios peruanos: Ninguno. Herbarios peruanos: CUZ?, USM?. Observaciones: Se conoce solamente del centro-sur del país, donde Observaciones: Este taxón arbustivo fue descrito posterior a .htm fue recolectada en sitios húmedos. Brako & Zarucchi (1993); no ha sido posible evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. Rev. peru. biol. Número especial 13(2): 237s - 241s (Diciembre 2006) El libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Perú. Ed.: Blanca León et al. 237s LEÓN & LAMMERS 5. Centropogon featherstonei Gleason Observaciones: Esta especie se conoce solamente de una localidad, en la cuenca del río Apurímac,al sur del Parque Nacional Otishi. LC Tiene afinidades con Centropogon mandonii, una especie boliviana. Probablemente, con nuevas exploraciones se sepa el área de presencia Publicación: Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 52: 17, de esta especie. f. 34. 1925. Colección tipo: J.F. Macbride & W. 9. Centropogon perlongus Gleason Featherstone 1605 Herbarios: F, NY, US. Nombre común: Desconocido. Registro departamental: AM, CA, HU, Publicación: Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 52: 19, LL, PA, PI. f. 39. 1925. Regiones Ecológicas: PAR, BMHM; Colección tipo: O.F. Cook & G.B. Gilbert 1355 2200—3380 m. Herbarios: US. SINANPE: PNYC Nombre común: Desconocido. Herbarios peruanos: CPUN (1), HAO (1), Registro departamental: AY, CU. USM (8). Regiones Ecológicas: BPM, BMHM; Observaciones: Arbusto o planta escandente, conocida de 1800—3600 m. ambas vertientes andinas. El ejemplar tipo fue recolectado en SINANPE: Sin registro. 1922 de la cuenca del Huallaga. Varias poblaciones han sido Herbarios peruanos: USM (2). registradas durante los últimos 25 años. Observaciones: Este taxón fue considerado por Brako & Zarucchi 6. Centropogon hypotrichus E. Wimm. (1993) como un endemismo; sin embargo, no ha sido posible evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. 10. Centropogon reflexus C. Presl Publicación: Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 13(6/2): 415. 1937. Colección tipo: C. Jelski 59 Publicación: Prod. Monog. Lobel. 49. Herbarios: W. 1836. Nombre común: Desconocido. Colección tipo: T. Haenke 1919 Registro departamental: HU. Herbarios: F, PR. Regiones Ecológicas: Sin datos; altitud Nombre común: Desconocido. desconocida. Registro departamental: HU, JU. SINANPE: Sin registro. Regiones Ecológicas: BMHM; 2100— Herbarios peruanos: Ninguno. 2850 m. Observaciones: Este taxón fue considerado por Brako & Zarucchi SINANPE: Sin registro. (1993) como un endemismo; sin embargo, no ha sido posible Herbarios peruanos: MOL (1), USM (14). evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. Observaciones: Este taxón fue considerado por Brako & Zarucchi 7. Centropogon isabellinus E. Wimm. (1993) como un endemismo; sin embargo, no ha sido posible evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. 11. Centropogon sciaphilus Zahlbr. Publicación: Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 19: 245. 1924. Colección tipo: O.F. Cook & G.B. Gilbert 1274 Herbarios: US. Publicación: Ann. Hofmus. Wien 6: 435. Nombre común: Desconocido. 1891. Registro departamental: CU. Colección tipo: E.F. Poeppig 1651 Regiones Ecológicas: BPM, BMHM; Herbarios: B, W. .htm 3600 m. Nombre común: Desconocido. SINANPE: SHMP Registro departamental: HU, JU, LO, Herbarios peruanos: CUZ (1)?, USM (1). PA, SM. Observaciones: Este taxón fue considerado por Brako & Zarucchi Regiones Ecológicas: BMHP, BHA; (1993) como un endemismo; sin embargo, no ha sido posible 200—1250 m. evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. SINANPE: Sin registro. Herbarios peruanos: AMAZ (2), USM (4). 8. Centropogon knoxii Lammers Observaciones: Este taxón fue considerado por Brako & Zarucchi NE (1993) como un endemismo; sin embargo, no ha sido posible evaluarlo, ni asignarle una categoría. Publicación: Brittonia 50(2): 249—251, f. 5 A-B. 1998. Colección tipo: M.T. Madison 10337—70 Herbarios: F. Nombre común: Desconocido. Registro departamental: AY. Regiones Ecológicas: BMHM; 3066 m. SINANPE: Sin registro. Herbarios peruanos: Ninguno. http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVRevistas/biologia/biologiaNEW Rev. peru. biol. Número especial 13(2): 237s - 241s (Diciembre 2006) 238s El libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Perú. Ed.: Blanca León et al. CAMPANULACEAE ENDÉMICAS DEL PERÚ 12. Centropogon simulans Lammers Observaciones: Esta especie se conoce de tres localidades en el nor-centro del país. Fue descrita de una planta recolectada en NE 1903 de la cuenca del Monzón, una localidad que alberga otros endemismos y su estudio y conservación debería ser de interés a Publicación: Brittonia 50(2): 251—252, botánicos y conservacionistas. Otrras poblaciones incluyen las f. 5 C-E. 1998. cuencas del Marañón y Huallaga. Colección tipo: J.D. Boeke & S. Boeke 3250 Herbarios: F, NY. 16. Lysipomia globularis E. Wimm. Nombre común: Desconocido. Registro departamental: CU. EN, B1ab(iii) Regiones Ecológicas: MA; altitud desconocida. Publicación: Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. SINANPE: Sin registro. Ser. 13(6/2): 485. 1937. Herbarios peruanos: Ninguno. Colección tipo: A. Raimondi 4694 Herbarios: B; USM!. Observaciones: Esta especie arbustiva, de olor desagradable, es Nombre común: Desconocido. conocida solamente de una localidad en la cuenca del Urubamba. Al Registro departamental: CA, HU. parecer, no hay registros adicionales, probablemente debido a lo Regiones Ecológicas: PAR; altitud poco que se recolecta en matorrales y a la escasa exploración en los desconocida. ambientes andinos con estacionalidad marcada. SINANPE: Sin registro. Herbarios peruanos: USM (isotipo+2). 13. Centropogon varicus McVaugh Observaciones: Entre las plantas paramunas interesantes se encuentra esta especie herbácea, descrita originalmente
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endemism As a Tool for Conservation. Podocarpus National Park a Case Study
    Pablo Lozano Tania Delgado y Zhofre Aguirre 44 Endemism as a tool for conservation. Podocarpus National Park a case study. Resumen El Parque Nacional Podocarpus (PNP), ubicado al sur del Ecuador, posee 211 especies endémicas de las registradas para el país. El presente estudio identificó 70 especies endémicas exclusivas, en 29 familias y 50 géneros. Se considera que algunos taxones tienen su centro de diversidad en el PNP (Brachyotum, Centropogon y Lysipomia). El mayor endemismo, se ubica principalmente entre 2800 a 3200 m, en la transición de páramo arbustivo a páramo herbáceo. De acuerdo al análisis TWINSPAN, se encontraron dos comunidades vegetales subdivididas y cinco asociaciones. En las dos primeras comunidades de páramos y arbustales naturales y antrópicos que comprende la franja altitudinal 2300-3400 m, se distribuyen las endémicas, aumentando su presencia a medida que haciende la gradiente. Este estudio reconoce 22 unidades de paisaje, considerándose el área con endemismo extremadamente alto al tipo de vegetación de bosque chaparro, que corresponde a la franja de sub-páramo, con prioridad para conservar, las áreas de bajo endemismo, son bosque abierto/matorral/pastizal; tienen la misma importancia por su exclusividad y posición fuera del PNP. El sitio con mayor número de endémicas es Cajanuma con 40 especies, mientras que el sitio con mayor acumulación de endémicas por superficie muestreada es Cerro Toledo, con 12 especies en 175 m². Todas las especies tienen una amplia distribución en los páramos del parque, con algunas excepciones de distribución restringida como el caso de Puya obconica en el sector de Sabanilla con un rango no mayor a 10 km².
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation, Correlated and Contingent Evolution, and Net Species Diversification in Bromeliaceae
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 71 (2014) 55–78 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Adaptive radiation, correlated and contingent evolution, and net species diversification in Bromeliaceae Thomas J. Givnish a,*, Michael H.J. Barfuss b, Benjamin Van Ee c, Ricarda Riina d, Katharina Schulte e,f, Ralf Horres g, Philip A. Gonsiska a, Rachel S. Jabaily h, Darren M. Crayn f, J. Andrew C. Smith i, Klaus Winter j, Gregory K. Brown k, Timothy M. Evans l, Bruce K. Holst m, Harry Luther n, Walter Till b, Georg Zizka e, Paul E. Berry o, Kenneth J. Sytsma a a Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA b Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna A-1030, Austria c School of Natural Sciences, Black Hills State University, Spearfish, SD 57799, USA d Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, Madrid 28014, Spain e Department of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Research Institute Senckenberg and J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main D-60325, Germany f Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia g GenXPro, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany h Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA i Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom j Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama k Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA l Department of Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA m Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, Sarasota, FL 34236, USA n Gardens By The Bay, National Parks Board Headquarters, Singapore 259569, Singapore o Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA article info abstract Article history: We present an integrative model predicting associations among epiphytism, the tank habit, entangling Received 22 May 2013 seeds, C3 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Campanulaceae): Review, Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Analyses
    PhytoKeys 174: 13–45 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.174.59555 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematics of Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae): review, phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses Samuel Paul Kagame1,2,3, Andrew W. Gichira1,3, Ling-Yun Chen1,4, Qing-Feng Wang1,3 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China 4 State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of TCM Evaluation and Translational Research, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China Corresponding author: Ling-Yun Chen ([email protected]); Qing-Feng Wang ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Morden | Received 12 October 2020 | Accepted 1 February 2021 | Published 5 March 2021 Citation: Kagame SP, Gichira AW, Chen L, Wang Q (2021) Systematics of Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae): review, phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses. PhytoKeys 174: 13–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.174.59555 Abstract Lobelioideae, the largest subfamily within Campanulaceae, includes 33 genera and approximately1200 species. It is characterized by resupinate flowers with zygomorphic corollas and connate anthers and is widely distributed across the world. The systematics of Lobelioideae has been quite challenging over the years, with different scholars postulating varying theories. To outline major progress and highlight the ex- isting systematic problems in Lobelioideae, we conducted a literature review on this subfamily. Addition- ally, we conducted phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses for Lobelioideae using plastids and internal transcribed spacer regions.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE TRAVEL COSTA RICA Trip Report and Species Lists 22Nd February – 8Th March 2014
    WILDLIFE TRAVEL COSTA RICA Trip Report and Species Lists 22nd February – 8th March 2014 From the western Pacific habitats to the eastern Caribbean slope An introduction to the Neo-Tropics exploring Costa Rica’s varied landscapes and wildlife Photo: Scarlet Macaw on Tropical Almond (Almendro de Mar), Terminalia catappa, by Robin Sibson DATE LOCATIONS & NOTES 1 22nd Feb Flight from the UK to San Jose 2 23rd Feb Poas Volcano; Hotel Robledal 3 24th Feb Cártago; Talamanca Mountains; Toucanet Lodge 4 25th Feb Cerro de la Muerte; Los Quetzales NP; San Gerardo de Dota; Toucanet Lodge 5 26th Feb Central Pacific area; Tárcoles River; Villas Lapas 6 27th Feb Carara NP Biological Reserve; Tárcoles beach; Villa Lapas 7 28th Feb Don Juan’s Organic Farm; Arenal; La Fortuna; Hotel Tilajara 8 1st Mar Volcan Arenal National Park; Hotel Tilajara 9 2nd Mar Sarapiquí Lowlands; Puerto Viejo De Sarapiquí; Sueño Azul Resort 10 3rd Mar La Selva Biological Station; Sueño Azul Resort 11 4th Mar Braulio Carrillo NP; Sueño Azul Resort 12 5th Mar Caño Blanco; Tortuguero National Park; Baula Lodge 13 6th Mar Parismina River; Tortuguero National Park; Baula Lodge 14 7th March El Ceibo Restaurant; Return to San Jose 15 8th March Lankester Gardens; Hotel Robledal 16 9th March Arrive back in the UK LIST OF TRAVELLERS Tour Leader Charlie Rugeroni Wildlife Travel, England Day 1 Saturday 22 February Outbound to Juan Santamaria International Airport, San Jose via Barajas Airport, Madrid (San Jose 1170m ASL) Gate A7 provided the meeting point before boarding the plane to Madrid. The morning was clear and enabled us to spot Swanage, Studland and Portland, including those areas which remained flooded after the persistent rains of recent weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Birding 21: 21–24), and an Offshore Islands and Antarctic Peninsula in Relief
    NeotropicalNeotropical BirdingBirding THE BIRDING MAGAZINE OF THE NEOTROPICAL BIRD CLUB Number 22 • Spring 2018 THENeotropical BIRDING MAGAZINE OF THE NEOTROPICAL Birding BIRD CLUB Senior Editor: James Lowen Editorial Committee: Nacho Areta, David Fisher, Raymond Jeffers, Dan Lebbin, Alexander Lees, Robin Restall, Michael Retter and Rob Williams ••~••~••~•~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~••~•• The Neotropical Bird Club Neotropical Bird Club aims to: COUNCIL: David Fisher (Chairman), Chris Balchin (Secretary and Advertising), Chris Collins (Treasurer), Rob Clay (Conservation • foster an interest in the Awards), Mike Dawson, Carl Downing, Gordon Ellis, Roberta Goodall, birds of the Neotropics Manuel Sanchez Nivicela, Chris Sharpe (Conservation Awards), Tom amongst birdwatchers Stuart, John Thirtle, Charles Wilkins and Rob Williams (Representatives). throughout the world PATRONS: The Club is delighted to be supported by the following patrons, well known for their contributions to Neotropical ornithology and • increase awareness of the conservation: Jon Fjeldså, Nancy Hilgert de Benavides and Robert S. Ridgely. importance of support for CORPORATE SUPPORTERS: Three options (conditions apply):1 Half-page conservation in the region advert (£250); 2 Full-page advert or two half-page adverts (£400); 3 Full- • mobilise the increasing page advert on back page (£450). For all Corporate Supporter enquiries number of enthusiastic please e-mail: [email protected] birdwatchers active in the MEMBERSHIP: Membership of the Club is
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Gesare New Crop Report HORT 5051 Centropogon
    Sarah Gesare New Crop Report HORT 5051 Centropogon erythraeus New Crop Report Taxonomy: Centropogon erythraeus is an herbaceous perennial in Ecuador with its most famous subspecies being found in Loja and Chinchipe provinces. It’s a member of the Campanulaceae family (Moreno & Pitman, 2013). Geographic Distribution: Centropogon erythraeus is native to Ecuador and Peru (Moreno & Pitman, 2013). In Ecuador its most famous subspecies are found in Loja and Chinchipe provinces. It’s likely found along the longitude/latitudinal range of 04°52′59″S79°16′59″W, whereby the climatic conditions are subtropical or tropical. There is no specific literature available on location, thus the latitudinal range is a rough estimate given the native provinces that it’s found in. In Ecuador Centropogon erythraeus is listed as endangered and is mainly found on roadsides as a colonizing species (Feix, 2012). Native Habitat: There is lack of detailed information as to how Centropogon erythraeus performs in its native habitat because it recently grabbed grower’s and conservative’s interest. As an endangered species studies and research on it are now being carried out. However, some websites do mention that it mainly grows on roadsides and it’s noted to be a roadside colonizer in some areas like around Podacarpus National Park (Feix, 2013). These little information can be a basis of further studies that can be carried out in understanding Centropogon erythraeus in its native habitat. Taxonomic Distribution: Centropogon erythraeus is an herbaceous perennial with an erect and bushy habit. It has “striking, magenta-brown, pubescent leaves and stems” with flowers that are close to 2" long (Seedhunt, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Andean Flora of Ecuador
    Andean Flora of Ecuador Naturetrek Tour Report 24 September - 9 October 2013 Report compiled by Gustavo Cañas-Valle Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Andean Flora of Ecuador Tour Leader: Gustavo Cañas-Valle Participants: Neil Sanders Vivien Aylmer Peter Douch Monica Douch George Everett Joan Vincent Introduction Ecuador harbors one of the richest floras of the world. Walking forested areas, along roads and paths, we try to convey the diversity of the flora of the Eastern Andes of Ecuador. Our exploration progresses through the main vegetation formations of a corridor traced between Quito and Vilcabamba, with side trips to the Cloud Forest on the eastern slopes. During the trip, we had brief evening gatherings to identify some of the readily described flowers up to level of genus. We photographed flowers belonging to 184 genera and 74 families. Among them, I identified 220 flowers to the species level. These 220 species included 34 plants endemic to Ecuador, 55 specialties unique to Ecuador and either Colombia or Peru, and 16 species only available in the territory covered by the three countries. In the end, our 14 day adventure generated a list of 105 range restricted flowering plants identified to species, which can be seen only in the Andes of either Ecuador or its neighbouring countries. Most of them occurr in habitats which also represent a reduced extension of native vegetation, for example: the Andean Paramos and the Dry Inter-Andean Valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Evolution of Vertebrate Pollination Syndromes in a Recently Diverged Andean Plant Clade
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.13297 Repeated evolution of vertebrate pollination syndromes in a recently diverged Andean plant clade Laura P. Lagomarsino,1,2,3 Elisabeth J. Forrestel,4 Nathan Muchhala,5 and Charles C. Davis1 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 2Current Address: Department of Biology, University of Missouri–St. Louis, and Missouri Botanical Garden, 4500 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 5Department of Biology, University of Missouri–St. Louis, Research Building, One University Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 Received February 23, 2017 Accepted May 25, 2017 Although specialized interactions, including those involving plants and their pollinators, are often invoked to explain high species diversity, they are rarely explored at macroevolutionary scales. We investigate the dynamic evolution of hummingbird and bat pollination syndromes in the centropogonid clade (Lobelioideae: Campanulaceae), an Andean-centered group of 550 angiosperm species. We demonstrate that flowers hypothesized to be adapted to different pollinators based on flower color fall into distinct regions of morphospace, and this is validated by morphology of species with known pollinators. This supports the existence of pollination syndromes in the centropogonids, an idea corroborated by ecological studies. We further demonstrate that humming- bird pollination is ancestral, and that bat pollination has evolved 13 times independently, with 11 reversals. This convergence is associated with correlated evolution of floral traits within selective regimes corresponding to pollination syndrome. Collectively, our results suggest that floral morphological diversity is extremely labile, likely resulting from selection imposed by pollinators.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae) from Ecuador
    A New Species of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae) from Ecuador Nathan Muchhala Department of Biology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 249118, Miami, Florida 33124, U.S.A. [email protected] Thomas G. Lammers Department of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Burmeistera auriculata is described 1987c). Here and in other publications (McVaugh, from a cloud forest remnant in Pichincha, Ecuador. 1943, 1949a, 1949b, 1957, 1965; Wimmer, 1955, Although allied to B. borjensis, this new species is 1968; GoÂmez & GoÂmez-Laurito, 1986; Lozano & distinguished from all known congeners by its au- Galeano, 1986; Luteyn, 1986; Stein, 1987b; Lam- riculate calyx. mers, 1998, 2002), 44 new species were described, while some taxa recognized by Wimmer (1943) RESUMEN. Se describe Burmeistera auriculata de un remanente de bosque nublado en Pichincha, Ec- were reduced to synonymy. uador. Aunque aliado a B. borjensis, esta especie Wimmer (1932, 1943, 1968) divided the genus nueva se distingue de las demaÂs Burmeisteras con- into two sections: Burmeistera (Imberbes, nom. in- ocidas por su caÂliz auriculado. valid), with all ®ve anthers sparsely soft-pubescent or glabrous at apex; and Barbatae E. Wimmer, with Key words: Burmeistera, Campanulaceae, Ec- the two ventral anthers barbate at apex. Though uador, Lobelioideae, South America. Wimmer further divided section Burmeistera into two subsections, Stein (1987b) transferred all mem- Burmeistera Triana (Campanulaceae: Lobelioi- bers of subsection Aequilatae E. Wimmer to the deae) comprises 102 species of robust plants (her- genus Siphocampylus Pohl. This sectional classi®- baceous or suffruticose perennials, shrubs, and li- cation is unsatisfactory, if only for the lack of struc- anas) distributed from Guatemala to Peru ture afforded so large a genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Lucía.Pdf
    ECOLOGY OF PLANT HUMMINGBIRD INTERACTIONS IN SANTA LUCÍA, ECUADOR Tatiana Santander, Esteban Guevara, Francisco Tobar, Holger Beck, Nicole Büttner, Andrea Nieto, Andrés Marcayata, Friederike Richter, María José Gavilanes, Cristian Poveda, Bryan Rojas, Rafael Wüest, Carolina Bello and Catherine H. Graham October 22, 2020 Contents 1. Introduction and project overview 1 2. Methodological Approach 2 Field transects ................................ 2 Time­lapse cameras .............................. 5 3. Resulting patterns 5 Plant­hummingbird interactions ........................ 5 Plants information and phenology ....................... 9 The Network of Interactions .......................... 12 4. Conclusions: 23 Acknowledgements 23 1. Introduction and project overview One of the main hypotheses for how so many related species can co­occur is resource ­partitioning where species use different resources, which limits competition among species and allows them to co­exist. In the case of hummingbirds and plants, each hummingbird species forages on a distinct set of flowers and each flowering plant species is visited by a subset of hummingbirds. Interactions between plants and hummingbirds are mutually beneficial. These mutualistic hummingbird­plant interactions are important from a hummingbird perspective because hummingbirds require nectar to fuel their high­energy lifestyles where they often hover – an energetically costly behavior – to take nectar. From a plant perspective most hummingbirds pollinate flowers as they forage on nectar, though some hummingbirds take nectar from the base of the flower, cheating the flower from this service of pollination. The intricate web of interactions between hummingbirds and their food plants evolved over millennia as a result of diffuse co­evolution which yielded a remarkable array of morphological forms and functions. On­going human activities, such as deforestation and climate change threaten these interaction webs, yet little is known as to how hummingbirds and their food plants will respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin, Adaptive Radiation and Diversification of The
    Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 407–416 doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1204 Published online 14 October 2008 Origin, adaptive radiation and diversification of the Hawaiian lobeliads (Asterales: Campanulaceae) Thomas J. Givnish1,*, Kendra C. Millam1, Austin R. Mast2, Thomas B. Paterson1, Terra J. Theim1, Andrew L. Hipp3, Jillian M. Henss1, James F. Smith4, Kenneth R. Wood5 and Kenneth J. Sytsma1 1Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2Department of Biology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA 3Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL 60532, USA 4Director, Snake River Plains Herbarium, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA 5National Tropical Botanical Garden, Kalaheo, HI 96741, USA The endemic Hawaiian lobeliads are exceptionally species rich and exhibit striking diversity in habitat, growth form, pollination biology and seed dispersal, but their origins and pattern of diversification remain shrouded in mystery. Up to five independent colonizations have been proposed based on morphological differences among extant taxa. We present a molecular phylogeny showing that the Hawaiian lobeliads are the product of one immigration event; that they are the largest plant clade on any single oceanic island or archipelago; that their ancestor arrived roughly 13 Myr ago; and that this ancestor was most likely woody, wind-dispersed, bird-pollinated, and adapted to open habitats at mid-elevations. Invasion of closed tropical forests is associated with evolution of fleshy fruits. Limited dispersal of such fruits in wet-forest understoreys appears to have accelerated speciation and led to a series of parallel adaptive radiations in Cyanea, with most species restricted to single islands. Consistency of Cyanea diversity across all tall islands except Hawai`i suggests that diversification of Cyanea saturates in less than 1.5 Myr.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Level Phylogeny and Evolutionary Trends in Campanulaceae Subfam
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46 (2008) 1–18 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Higher level phylogeny and evolutionary trends in Campanulaceae subfam. Lobelioideae: Molecular signal overshadows morphology Alexandre Antonelli * Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Go¨teborg University, P.O. Box 461, SE-405 30 Go¨teborg, Sweden Received 20 April 2006; revised 15 June 2007; accepted 18 June 2007 Available online 30 June 2007 Abstract Relationships within the subfamily Lobelioideae in Campanulaceae are inferred from DNA sequence variation in the rbcL and ndhF genes, and the trnL–F region including the trnL intron and the trnL–F intergenic spacer. Results derived from Bayesian and parsimony analyses provide evidence for the long-suspected paraphyly of the genus Lobelia, comprising over 400 species as presently circumscribed. The perennial dwarf herbs belonging to the Andean genus Lysipomia are sister to a group comprising the Neotropical shrubs Burmeis- tera, Centropogon, and Siphocampylus. Giant lobelioids from the Hawaiian Islands, Brazil, Africa, and Sri Lanka form a strongly sup- ported group. Character optimizations on the phylogenetic tree reveal that shifts in fruit types and lignification have occurred much more commonly than generally assumed. The main clades in the subfamily are outlined, which largely contradict previous classifications based on morphology. Ó 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Campanulaceae; Lobelioideae (Lobeliaceae); rbcL; ndhF; trnL–F; Fruit evolution; Bayesian inference; SH test; Systematics 1. Introduction As currently circumscribed (Lammers, 1998b), the family is divided into five subfamilies: Campanuloideae The Campanulaceae Jussieu is a well-known group of Burnett, Lobelioideae Burnett, Nemacladoideae Lam- plants comprising 84 genera and nearly 2400 species (Lam- mers, Cyphioideae (A.
    [Show full text]