DOCSLIB.ORG

Indiana State Suicide Prevention Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indiana State Suicide Prevention Plan INDIANA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION PLAN JOURNEY FROM HOPELESSNESS TO HEALTH Indiana State Suicide Prevention Plan Presented by the Indiana State Department of Health and the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Mental Health and Addiction. Table of Contents The Personal and Public Tragedy of Suicide in Indiana .......................... 3 Teenagers and Young Adults ............................................................... 4 Child Maltreatment ............................................................................. 6 The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Population .................... 7 The Older Adult Population ................................................................. 8 Ethnic and Racial Minority Groups ...................................................... 9 The Military ....................................................................................... 11 State of Suicide Survey ......................................................................... 12 Indiana Suicide Prevention Action Areas ............................................. 13 I. Awareness ...................................................................................... 13 II. Prevention ..................................................................................... 16 III. Intervention .................................................................................. 18 IV. Postvention .................................................................................. 20 V. Evaluation ...................................................................................... 22 Legislation ............................................................................................. 24 Resources .............................................................................................. 28 References ............................................................................................ 30 Suicide Advisory Committee................................................................. 32 INDIANA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION PLAN 1 We would like to thank the courageous individuals who shared their heart-breaking stories with us. We commend their continued efforts in suicide prevention in Indiana. Our wish, like theirs, is a state working together to prevent the tragic loss of life by suicide. For more information about suicide in Indiana, visit: www.IN.gov/isdh/20627.htm (youth mental health and suicide attempt) www.IN.gov/isdh/25194.htm (adult mental health) www.IN.gov/isdh/reports/mortality/2009/table09/tbl09_00.htm (suicide among all ages) INDIANA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION PLAN 2 The Personal and Public Tragedy of Suicide in Indiana Burden of Suicide in the United States The facts on suicide are staggering. More Americans die from suicide every year than from homicide. In 2009, nearly 37,000 suicides oc- curred, an average of one life lost every 14.2 minutes. In 2009, suicide In 2009 in the was the 10th leading cause of death overall and 3rd for those ages 15–24 U.S., one life years. It is estimated that more than 900,000 Americans need emer- gency care annually due to a nonfatal suicide attempt. This translates was lost to to one attempt every 34 seconds and 25 attempts for every death by suicide every suicide.1 14.2 minutes.1 In addition to the emotional impact on families and friends, suicide also places an enormous financial burden on our society. The Cen- ters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated the cost to society of $26.7 billion in combined medical and work loss costs in 2005.2 For each suicide prevented, the United States could save an average of $1,182,559 in medical expenses and lost productivity.3 Burden of Suicide in Indiana In 2009, 826 suicides occurred in Indiana, making suicide the 11th leading cause of death among Hoosiers. The majority of these deaths occurred among those ages 25–64 years (72%).4 826 Hoosiers Suicide was the 2nd leading cause of death among those ages 15–34 died by suicide years, the 3rd leading cause of death among those ages 10–14 years, and the 4th leading cause of death among those ages 35–54 years.4 in 2009, making it the 11th In 2009, Hoosiers between the ages 25–34 had the highest rate of hospi- talization (72.7 per 100,000) due to self-inflicted injury or suicide attempt, leading cause while those ages 15–24 years had the highest rate of emergency depart- 4 of death. ment visits (182.0 per 100,000).5 Suicide is a complex problem, resulting from one or more biological, psycho- logical, environmental, social and/or cultural factors. Several factors can put a person at risk for suicide. But, having these risk factors does not always mean that suicide will occur. Known risk factors include: • Previous suicide attempt(s) • Family history of suicide or • Barriers to care • History of depression or violence • Physical illness other mental illness • Financial or relationship losses • Feeling alone • Alcohol or drug abuse • Lack of social support There are also factors that help protect people from suicide. Certain protective factors, such as problem-solving and conflict resolution skills, strong family and community connections, and access to effective clinical care for mental, physical and substance abuse disorders, can help counter these risks and challenges. INDIANA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION PLAN 3 Did you know that in Indiana: 4,5 • More than 800 people a year die by suicide-- an average of 2 Hoosiers a day. • Suicide is the 11th leading cause of death among Hoosiers of all ages; it is the 2nd leading cause of death among Hoosiers ages 15–34 years. • More Hoosiers die by suicide than homicide. • It is estimated that more than 4,000 Hoosiers will seek emergency care this year for injuries related to suicide attempt. Voices of Suicide Survivors The designation of a “suicide survivor” refers to the family and friends who are directly affected and impacted by the suicide death of their loved one. This definition does not represent all the people affected by the suicide, such as those affected by a suicide death in a school, faith community or other community setting, but refers to those who were closest to the victim.1,6 Survivors of suicide are themselves at an increased risk for suicide. Experts have estimated that each suicide intimately affects at least six other people.1 Based on this estimate, there are about 5,000 new people affected by the tragedy of suicide in Indiana each year.4 Suicide among Teenagers and Young Adults Young people with mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, or insom- nia, are at higher risk for suicidal thoughts, as are teens experiencing major life changes, such as the divorce of parents, moving, or change in financial security. Victims of bullying are also more likely to think about suicide.7 The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) monitors health risks and behav- iors among Indiana high school students. The results below from the 2011 YRBS show that nearly three out of ten high school students felt so depressed that they stopped doing their usual activities, and more than one out of ten actually attempted suicide.8 Depression and Suicide among E.R. Visits/Hospitalizations and Deaths from Suicide Attempts Indiana Students, Grades 9-12 Ages 15-24, Indiana, 20094,5 During the past year: 1268 Hospital Visits 29% felt so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that they stopped doing their usual activities. 978 19% seriously considered suicide. Hospital Visits 14% made a plan about how they would attempt suicide. 11% actually attempted suicide. 4% made a suicide attempt that resulted in an injury, poisoning, or overdose that had to be treated medically. 29: the average annual number of suicide-related deaths among Indiana 14-18 year olds during 2004-2008. 98 Deaths 11 Deaths Source: Indiana Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Indiana State Department of Health Males Females INDIANA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION PLAN 4 For teenagers and young adults ages 15– 24 years, suicide is the 2nd leading cause of In 2009: death.4 But deaths from youth suicide are only part of the problem. For every sui- • 109 Hoosiers ages 15–24 took their lives.4 cide death, there are about 15 emergency • More than 1,600 Hoosiers ages 15–24 department visits due to suicide attempts. visited the emergency department due Although girls are more likely to attempt 5 suicide, boys are much more likely than to self-inflicted injuries. girls to die by suicide.7 Loss of a Son “His heart, his laughter, comedy and smile are with me all the time…that precious young man that I am blessed to call SON.” –Lisa B., Noblesville “There is no way to accurately explain what it is like to have lost a loved one to a disease that so many do not recog- nize, understand, or care to acknowl- edge. There is no way to convey the hole in our hearts to individuals that cannot get past what shame it is be- cause ‘we did not outlive our children’. They are right we should not outlive our children, so let’s do something Lisa and Doug B. with son, Kurt about it rather than just say what a shame it is. Let’s talk about the fact that my son was a handsome young man, strong in his love for children and animals, hilariously funny, and artistically creative, but suffered daily with a depressive disorder. Let’s talk about the stigma linked to anything labeled as a ‘men- tal illness’ and the reluctance to admit to anyone that such a problem might exist. Let’s talk about the never ending pain that will forever reside in a father that misses his son
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prison Suicide: an Overview and Guide to Prevention National Institute of Corrections
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections Prison Suicide: An Overview and Guide to Prevention National Institute of Corrections Morris L. Thigpen, Director Susan M. Hunter, Chief Prisons Division John E. Moore, Project Manager Prison Suicide: An Overview and Guide to Prevention By Lindsay M. Hayes Project Director National Center on Institutions and Alternatives Mansfield, Massachusetts June 1995 This document was prepared under grant number 93P01GHU1 from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Copyright © 1995 by the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives The National Institute of Corrections reserves the right to reproduce, publish, translate, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to publish and use all or any part of the copyrighted material contained in this publication. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................v PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................vi 1. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................1 2. NATIONAL AND STATE STANDARDS FOR PRISON SUICIDE PREVENTION ...........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Research: Selected Readings. Volume 2
    SuicideResearchText-Vol2:SuicideResearchText-Vol2 8/6/10 11:00 AM Page i SUICIDE RESEARCH: SELECTED READINGS Volume 2 May 2009–October 2009 J. Sveticic, K. Andersen, D. De Leo Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention National Centre of Excellence in Suicide Prevention SuicideResearchText-Vol2:SuicideResearchText-Vol2 8/6/10 11:00 AM Page ii First published in 2009 Australian Academic Press 32 Jeays Street Bowen Hills Qld 4006 Australia www.australianacademicpress.com.au Reprinted in 2010 Copyright for the Introduction and Comments sections is held by the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, 2009. Copyright in all abstracts is retained by the current rights holder. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior permission from the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention. ISBN: 978-1-921513-53-4 SuicideResearchText-Vol2:SuicideResearchText-Vol2 8/6/10 11:00 AM Page iii Contents Foreword ................................................................................................vii Acknowledgments ..............................................................................viii Introduction Context ..................................................................................................1 Methodology ........................................................................................2 Key articles Alexopoulos et al, 2009. Reducing suicidal ideation
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide in Correctional Facilities
    Suicide in Correctional Facilities Suicide in Correctional Facilities Albert De Amicis, MPPM University of Phoenix Faculty September 14, 2009 Suicide in a Correctional Facility Table of Contents ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………....1 NCIA 1981 SUICIDE VICTIMS PROFILE – Table -1.......................................................3 DEFINE THE PROBLEM………………………………………………………………....8 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………..14 ESTABLISH THE EVALUATION CRITERIA……………………………………….....16 EVALUATING ALTERNATIVE POLICIES …………………………………………... 17 Alternative One - Elayn Hunt Correctional Center Suicide Prevention Plan.......... 17 Alternative Two - Jefferson County Corrections: Inmate Watch Program Helps Prevent Suicides..............................................................22 DISTINGUISHING AMONG ALTERNATIVES……………………………………….. 25 Alternative One - Elayn Hunt Correctional Center Suicide Prevention Plan.......... 25 Benefit Cost Analysis Salaries – Table-2....................................28 Alternative Two - Jefferson County Corrections: Inmate Watch Program Helps Prevent Suicides..............................................................30 DISTINGUISHING AMONG ALTERNATIVE POLICIES..............................................31 APPLICATION OF THE SATISFICING METHOD – Table-3.........................................31 MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES ………………………........32 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Watch
    SUICIDE Anyone who cares about kids wants to know: Why are so many young people intent on destroying themselves? And what can schools do to save them? BY REBECCA JONES Reprinted with permission from American School Board Journal Photo: © JFB/Stone © May 2001 by the National School Boards Association n Dec. 1, 2000, a 17-year-old boy set up a video suicide does happen, that’s the worst possible [time] to try to camera in the parking lot of Granada Hills High fly by the seat of your pants.” School just outside Los Angeles. Then he Now is the time, he and other experts say, to identify vul- turned up his car radio and shot himself in the nerable children and protect them from themselves. But how? head. Several federal agencies are collaborating to develop suicide- Dozens, maybe hundreds, of students wit- prevention guidelines for school districts, based on guidelines nessed the shooting. It was the second suicide developed in New Zealand. Work has been slow because the among the school’s 3,700 students in three research in this area isn’t always clear and the experts don’t al- weeks. Another Granada Hills student had ways agree. But researchers, experts, and attorneys agree on weighted herself down and jumped into her family’s the importance of a few principles: swimming pool. OThousands of kids end it all, or try to, every year. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 5,000 KNOW WHAT YOU’RE DEALING WITH young people kill themselves each year, but suicide experts say A Los Angeles principal calls Richard Lieberman—known as the true toll is probably two or three times higher.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guidelines: Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide
    Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide: U.S. National Guidelines Survivors of Suicide Loss Task Force April 2015 Blank page Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide: U.S. National Guidelines Table of Contents Front Matter Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... i Task Force Co-Leads, Members .................................................................................................................. ii Reviewers .................................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... iii National Guidelines Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Terminology: “Postvention” and “Loss Survivor” ....................................................................................... 4 Development and Purpose of the Guidelines ............................................................................................. 6 Audience of the Guidelines ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Study of Jail Suicide: 20 Years Later Foreword
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534 Morris L. Thigpen Director Thomas J. Beauclair Deputy Director Virginia A. Hutchinson Chief, Jails Division Fran Zandi Program Manager National Institute of Corrections www.nicic.gov Lindsay M. Hayes, Project Director National Center on Institutions and Alternatives April 2010 NIC Accession Number 024308 This document was prepared under cooperative agreement number 06J47GJM0 from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................ix Executive Summary ............................................................................................xi Chapter 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Prior Jail Suicide Research .................................................................................... 2 A Word About Suicide Victim Profiles .................................................................... 3 Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2000...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention Juvenile Correction Detention Facilities
    ig~aT, g - Performance-Based Standards for Juvenile Correction and Detention Facilities: A Resource Guide Suicide Prevention irg Juvenile Correction and Detention Facilities CA[ councilo,,oveoile Ofl~-eof ;mt,,~Progmm t'S Dep~l~lca I~th'e ~ Correctional Administrators 0 0 Suicide Prevention In Juvenile Correction and Detention Facilities Prepared by: Lindsay M. Hayes Assistant Director National Center on Institutions and Alternatives With assistance from: Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators Edward J. Loughran, Executive Director Kim Godfrey, Assistant Director Tracy Maziarz, Research Assistant Stacy Nasiakos, Research Assistant March 1999 r This document was prepared by the Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators, and was supported by cooperative agreement #98-JB-VX-K003 with the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Table of Contents Io Introduction 1 II. Background: Scope of Problem 3 Prevalence 4 Risk Factors 4 Suicide Contagion in a Juvenile Correctional Facility 5 OJJDP's Conditions of Confinement Report 12 Critical Components of a Suicide Prevention Plan 15 Staff Training 15 Intake Screening/Assessment 16 Communication 18 Housing 19 Levels of Supervision 20 Intervention 20 Reporting 21 Follow-up/Administrative Review 21 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention Tier 1, 2 & 3
    Suicide Prevention Tier 1, 2 & 3 Strategy Brief, February, 2016 Shir Palmon, Amber Olson, Elisabeth Kane & Reece Peterson, University of Nebraska-Lincoln uicide is the eighth leading cause of death among all ages in the United States (Mental SHealth America, n.d.). It is the second leading cause of death among youth aged 15-24 (American Association of Suicidology, 2015). Furthermore, suicide is the third leading cause of death for individuals between the ages of 10-19, preceded only by unintentional injury and ho- micide. Those who are 15-19 years old are six times more likely to complete suicide then their younger peers (Cooper, Clements, & Holt, 2011; Heron, 2007), making middle school and high school a crucial time to address suicide in adolescents and young adults. In addition to causing tremendous emotional distress for the friends and family of those who at- tempt or comple suicide, suicide deaths cost the United States 16 billion dollars annually, and nonfa- tal attempts cost 4.7 billion dollars annually. These Tier 1, 2 or 3 numbers are reached by adding direct costs (i.e., treatment, hospital services, funeral, police investiga- Intervention tions), indirect costs (i.e., productivity losses due to disability, years of productive life lost, work losses by family and friends, lost investment in social capital), and intangible/human costs (i.e., pain, grief, and suf- fering; Centre for Suicide Prevention, 2010). What is Suicide and Suicide Prevention? According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) webpage, suicide is defined as “death caused by self-directed injurious behavior with any attempt to die as a result of the behavior.” A suicide attempt is defined as “a non-fatal self-directed potentially injurious behavior with any intent to die as a result of the behavior; a suicide attempt may or may not result in injury.” And, suicidal ideation is defined as “thinking about, considering, or planning for suicide” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention for Juvenile Justice Populations
    Suicide Prevention for Juvenile Justice Populations Recommended Training Content and Resources for Juvenile Justice Staff in Detention, Courts, and Probation November 2018 Prepared by the Illinois Public Health Institute and The Suicide Prevention/Juvenile Justice Curriculum Ad Hoc Committee for the Illinois Department of Public Health Suicide Prevention/Juvenile Justice Curriculum Ad Hoc Committee Members Karen M. Abram, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director, Health Disparities & Public Policy Program - Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Jennifer Arreola Volunteer, Middle/High School Outreach Committee – Illinois Chapter of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention Jill Bullock Director - Henry County Court Services Sharon L. Coleman, Psy.D. Associate Director for Forensic Services - Illinois Department of Human Services Paul Fleming Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention Connie Kaiser Superintendent - Juvenile Detention in Champaign County Olivia Johnson, DM St. Clair County Suicide Prevention Alliance, IL State Rep - National Police Suicide Foundation Rebecca Levin Strategic Director, Injury Prevention and Research Center - Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago Stanley A. Lewy President and Founder - Suicide Prevention Association Jennifer Martin Suicide Prevention Project Manager - Illinois Department of Public Health Steve Moore Attorney and Co-Chair of the Illinois Chapter of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention Mark A. Reinecke, Ph.D. Director - Child and Adolescent Mood (CAM) Lab at Northwestern University Warren Sibilla Jr., Ph.D. Assistant Professor - Chicago School of Professional Psychology Jason Steele Field Services Manager - Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts Robert John Zagar, Ph.D. MPH CEO - Dr. Robert John Zagar PC; Consultant - Juvenile Division Circuit Court of Cook County Professor - Chicago School of Professional Psychology; General Manager - Actuarial Risk Tests Page 1 of 69 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide & Self-Harm in Prisons
    DIGNITY Publication Series on Torture and Organised Violence # Literature Review 23 SUICIDE & SELF-HARM IN PRISONS Maha Aon Marie My Warborg Larsen Marie Brasholt SUICIDE & SELF-HARM IN PRISONS AN INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE REVIEW PREVENTION OF SUICIDE, SUICIDE ATTEMPTS AND SELF-HARM IN MOROCCAN PRISONS - A JOINT PROJECT BETWEEN THE GENERAL DELEGATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PRISONS AND RE-INTEGRATION (DGAPR) AND THE DANISH INSTITUTE AGAINST TORTURE (DIGNITY) WITH FUNDING BY THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION (OSF) Literature search performed by Ion Iacos, DIGNITY Documentalist. SUICIDE & SELF-HARM IN PRISONS – A LITERATURE REVIEW | 5 SUICIDE & SELF-HARM IN PRISONS Maha Aon Marie My Warborg Larsen Marie Brasholt DIGNITY Publication Series on Torture and Organised Violence No. 23 DIGNITY - Danish Institute Against Torture © 2018 DIGNITY - Danish Institute Against Torture. www.dignity.dk ISBN Online: 978-87-93675-16-2 ISBN Print: 978-87-93675-17-9 SUICIDE & SELF-HARM IN PRISONS – A LITERATURE REVIEW | 5 Contents Introduction 6 Section 1: The epidemiology of suicide and self-harm in prisons 7 1.1 Definitions 7 1.2 Suicide and self-harm rates 8 1.3 Methods and timing 10 Section 2: Risk factors for suicide and self-harm in prisons 14 2.1 Risk factors for suicide 14 2.2 Risk factors for self-harm 16 2.3 The role of gender 17 2.4 The role of prison conditions & practices (ecological prison variables) 17 Section 3: Prevention 19 3.1 Screening upon entry 21 3.2 Observation and handling at-risk prisoners 23 3.3 Training and continued risk assessment 25 3.4
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Assessment, Treatment, and Management Introduction
    Suicide Assessment, Treatment, and Management 1 ______________________________________________________________ Suicide Assessment, Treatment, and Management Introduction Case Vignette Gerald Abbot is a psychology intern in a college counseling center. He has been working with Kyra, a college freshman, over the past month. She initially sought treatment due to depression, and Gerald feels she has made progress. She appears more engaged in treatment, and is less isolated. He is surprised when he receives a phone call from the center’s crisis clinician, indicating that Kyra had called in to their hotline the prior night, expressing suicidal ideation. She was sent to a local psychiatric hospital for evaluation. Gerald is upset, and asks himself what he missed. One of the most challenging — and prevalent — issues clinicians can face is a client’s suicidal crisis. Suicide is defined as self-inflicted death with evidence (either explicit or implicit) that the person intended to die. Although many clients experience major depressive episodes, training on how to manage suicidality is often not a component of training curriculums. Many recommendations are impractical in managing an emerging crisis. Working with a client in suicidal crisis can be difficult, and evoke strong feelings in the therapist. In a recent APA Monitor (April, 2014) message, APA president Nadine Kaslow sends a call to arms, urging psychologists to continue to focus on developing a public health perspective to reducing suicide. She states that such an agenda must address diverse populations and span the continuum of suicidal behavior. Some of Kaslow’s suggestions include: a) standardizing and providing training to psychologists and trainees on suicide assessment and treatment, b) training community members as gatekeepers for identifying and referring those at risk, and c) creating, assessing and disseminating programs that have a broad impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide, Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: When People Choose to Die, Does It Matter What We Call It?
    ROCZNIKI PSYCHOLOGICZNE Tom/Vol. XII, nr/no. 1 – 2009 GAVIN J. FAIRBAIRN ** SUICIDE, ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA: WHEN PEOPLE CHOOSE TO DIE, DOES IT MATTER WHAT WE CALL IT? In this article, I raise some questions about two human phenomena—suicide and euthanasia, in which people choose to die, and take steps to arrange their deaths. I am concerned with these phenomena at three levels: • With the language that we use to describe and talk about them. • With the ways in which the words we use impact on how we relate to those who wish for death or who act in ways that suggest that they do, even if they don’t. • With some ethical issues that arise in relation to them. I begin with a discussion of the impoverished language and conceptual landscape of suicide and suicidal self harm, and suggest that this poverty of language is unhelpful, because it fre- quently leads to the mislabelling of deliberate self-harming and apparently self-harming acts. Through discussion of some problems with the current language, and of some real and hypotheti- cal stories about suicide and acts that resemble suicide, but are distinct from it, I introduce some new ways of thinking about and labelling these most distressing of human phenomena. Later, I turn to the way in which the term ‘assisted suicide’ has begun to be used to label ‘ar- ranged deaths’ that are more properly referred to as ‘euthanasia’. Nowadays, in many countries, including mine, more and more people not only want to have the opportunity to decide on the time of their dying, but want to arrange their deaths with the blessing of the legal system.
    [Show full text]