Semantic Web for Robots : Applying Semantic Web Technologies for Interoperability Between Virtual Worlds and Real Robots

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Semantic Web for Robots : Applying Semantic Web Technologies for Interoperability Between Virtual Worlds and Real Robots Semantic web for robots : applying semantic web technologies for interoperability between virtual worlds and real robots Citation for published version (APA): Juarez Cordova, A. G. (2012). Semantic web for robots : applying semantic web technologies for interoperability between virtual worlds and real robots. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR731146 DOI: 10.6100/IR731146 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2012 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement: www.tue.nl/taverne Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: [email protected] providing details and we will investigate your claim. Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 Semantic Web for Robots Applying Semantic Web technologies for interoperability between virtual worlds and real robots Alex Juarez Typeset with LATEX2ε Cover Design by Alex Juarez Printed by proefschriftmaken.nl || printyourthesis.com Published by Uitgeverij BOXPress, Oisterwijk c Alex Juarez 2012. All rights reserved. A catalogue record is available from the Eindhoven University of Technology Library. ISBN: 978-90-386-3121-9 Proefontwerp Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Trefw.:Systems Design, Semantic Web, Knowledge Engineering, Robotics, Ontologies Semantic Web for Robots Applying Semantic Web technologies for interoperability between virtual worlds and real robots PROEFONTWERP ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr.ir. C.J. van Duijn, voor een commissie aangewezen door het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 2 april 2012 om 16.00 uur door Alex Giovanni Juarez Cordova geboren te San Salvador, El Salvador De documentatie van het proefontwerp is goedgekeurd door de promotor: prof.dr.ir. L.M.G. Feijs Copromotoren: dr. J. Hu PDEng MEng en dr. C. Bartneck MTD Acknowledgements A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. That step happened already three years ago when I decided to take the challenge of pursuing a PhD. That decision was by no means easy. At that time, it meant a professional challenge of stepping out of the comfort zone of mindless predictable machines, and into the unknown -to me, at least- and unpredictable environment of virtual worlds and human users. Moreover, it also meant a personal challenge of adapting to a new culture, new people, a new life. During this journey I have indeed gained considerable knowledge and expertise in several areas of science, but above all, I have met incredible, talented people along the way. They have contributed in many ways to my success in completing this PhD project, sometimes without even realizing it. Therefore, I think it is only just that I mention them -albeit briefly-, with the hope that my gratitude can somehow compensate all their help. Firstly I would like to express my most sincere appreciation to my promoter prof. dr. ir. Loe Feijs, and my copromoters and daily supervisors dr. Christoph Bartneck and dr. Jun Hu. You have kindly provided me with your guidance, knowledge, advice, and support during the different phases of the PhD project, and I certainly cherish our discussions about science, life, the universe, and everything. Many thanks go to the members of my reading committee prof. dr. Manfred Tschiegili, prof. dr. ir. Elke den Ouden, and prof. dr. Erwin Prassler for reviewing my work and for your constructive criticism. Special thanks to dr. Heico Sandee for being the contact point with RoboNed, and for his help with the development of RoboDB. Our collaboration was very productive!. My gratitude also goes to Lex van Geisel, Herman Tuininga, and Ted Schmidt from DevLab, for their collaboration during the Metaverse1 project and in developing the PAC4 prototype. We tested the waters of standardization of virtual worlds with impressive results!. I would also like to thank the “PhD’s”: Bram van der Vlist, Gerrit Niezen, Sibrecht Bouwstra, Roman Gurbonov, Jan Gellissen, Misha Croes, and Marija Nakevska. Not only we shared our -sometimes different- visions of science and research, but we indeed had fun in our own (geeky) way. As I sometimes said to you: “yo!, thanks for everything!”. A mis padres Alba y Nelson: gracias por apoyarme a lo largo del camino, por compren- derme y estar ahí cuando los necesitaba, más aún en la distancia. Gracias por enseñarme a no olvidar de donde vengo y hacia donde voy. Espero que puedan sentirse orgullosos de este nuevo logro, ya que a ustedes les debo el haber llegado tan lejos. i Acknowledgements Finally and most importantly, I would like to thank you, my lovely wife Anna. I would have never gotten this far without all your love and support. You have given me strength and wisdom to overcome the many difficulties that appeared in my way. That’s why I would like to dedicate this work to you. Wszystko dobre, co siędobrze kończy. Kocham cięksiężniczko. Alex Juarez January 2012, Eindhoven ii Contents Acknowledgements i List of Figures v List of Tables vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Interoperability in a broader context ..................... 6 1.2 Assumptions and limitations .......................... 8 1.3 Research goals ................................. 9 1.3.1 Research questions .......................... 9 1.4 Design process and methodology ....................... 10 1.4.1 Iterative design (spiral model) ..................... 12 1.5 Outline of this document ........................... 13 2 Related work 15 2.1 Bridging virtual and real worlds ........................ 17 2.1.1 Virtualized reality ........................... 17 2.1.2 Mixed reality .............................. 17 2.2 Cross-reality .................................. 18 2.3 Cross-reality and robotics ........................... 20 2.4 Creating knowledge about robots ....................... 22 3 Requirements and concepts 27 3.1 RoboDB .................................... 27 3.1.1 Functional requirements for RoboDB ................. 28 3.1.2 Technical requirements ........................ 29 3.2 PAC4 ...................................... 30 3.2.1 Functional requirements ........................ 31 3.2.2 Technical requirements ........................ 31 4 From data to information: RoboDB 33 4.1 Data format selection ............................. 33 4.2 Software tools selection ............................ 36 4.3 RoboDB system architecture ......................... 40 4.4 RoboDB implementation ........................... 43 4.4.1 Creating robot descriptions using Semantic Mediawiki ........ 43 4.4.2 Second RoboDB prototype ...................... 49 iii Contents 4.4.3 Usability evaluation .......................... 53 4.5 Content authoring in RoboDB ........................ 56 4.6 Concluding remarks .............................. 58 5Knowledgeengineering 61 5.1 Ontologies and the Semantic Web ...................... 61 5.2 Description Logics ............................... 62 5.3 Ontology design ................................ 65 5.4 Modelling robot capabilities .......................... 66 5.4.1 Related work .............................. 67 5.4.2 Implementation ............................ 69 5.4.3 Using the robot capability descriptions ................ 75 5.5 Case study: ROILAbot ............................ 76 5.6 Adding capability modelling to RoboDB ................... 83 5.7 Concluding remarks .............................. 86 6PAC4 89 6.1 MPEG-V .................................... 90 6.2 System design and implementation ...................... 96 6.3 Evaluation: Virtual Presence ......................... 97 6.3.1 The IPO-Social Presence Questionnaire ............... 98 6.3.2 Experimental setup .......................... 99 6.3.3 Experiment design ........................... 100 6.3.4 User experiment ............................ 100 6.3.5 Experiment results ........................... 101 6.3.6 Discussion ............................... 103 6.4 Concluding remarks .............................. 104 7 Conclusions 107 Bibliography 113 A RoboNed Letter 123 B Built-in
Recommended publications
  • Knowledge Representation in Bicategories of Relations
    Knowledge Representation in Bicategories of Relations Evan Patterson Department of Statistics, Stanford University Abstract We introduce the relational ontology log, or relational olog, a knowledge representation system based on the category of sets and relations. It is inspired by Spivak and Kent’s olog, a recent categorical framework for knowledge representation. Relational ologs interpolate between ologs and description logic, the dominant formalism for knowledge representation today. In this paper, we investigate relational ologs both for their own sake and to gain insight into the relationship between the algebraic and logical approaches to knowledge representation. On a practical level, we show by example that relational ologs have a friendly and intuitive—yet fully precise—graphical syntax, derived from the string diagrams of monoidal categories. We explain several other useful features of relational ologs not possessed by most description logics, such as a type system and a rich, flexible notion of instance data. In a more theoretical vein, we draw on categorical logic to show how relational ologs can be translated to and from logical theories in a fragment of first-order logic. Although we make extensive use of categorical language, this paper is designed to be self-contained and has considerable expository content. The only prerequisites are knowledge of first-order logic and the rudiments of category theory. 1. Introduction arXiv:1706.00526v2 [cs.AI] 1 Nov 2017 The representation of human knowledge in computable form is among the oldest and most fundamental problems of artificial intelligence. Several recent trends are stimulating continued research in the field of knowledge representation (KR).
    [Show full text]
  • Category Theory and Cyber Physical Systems
    Category theory and Cyber physical systems Eswaran Subrahmanian (CMU/NIST) Spencer Breiner (NIST) July 22, 2017 CPS workshop Robert Bosch Center for Cyber Physical Systems IISC Bangalore, India Talk outline • Basic elements of CPS • CPS as composition of different systems • Category theory • A formalism for representing different formalisms • A formalism for composing system from from formalisms. • Ologs • A CT based knowledge representation scheme • Examples of database intergration • Cyber and Physical system and composition. • String diagram for Process composition • Basic elements • Antilock brakes - Top level • Antilock brakes – Expanding The modulator • Redesign for traction control + stability control • Incorporating semantics • Conclusion Cyber physical system: A definition Cyber Physical Systems Interconnected Systems & Control Internet of Things Sensing and Acting Physical Environment Things Person Network Physical World 3 Basic elements and composition of CPS Basic elements • Perceptual devices: Identification and Measurements • Actuating devices: activation results in action • Physical devices: transmission, amplification of power, • Logical devices: computational/logical • Humans devices: mental model Multiple Modeling formalisms: logic, state machines, differential equations, stochastic models, etc. Requires composition and compositionality to ensure desired behavior Category theory • Category Theory (CT) is a potential solution. • CT is the mathematical theory of abstract processes and composition • CT could be thought of as the conceptual operating system. Categories & Composition • A category is a universe of resources (objects) �, �, �, … and processes (arrows) �, �, ℎ, … • Every process has input and output resources, indicated �:�→�. • The main property of categorical processes is that they compose: Category theory: relationship to domains Category Theory as a universal Modeling Language (Spivak, 2015*) The Category Theory (CT) view of modeling – two postulates: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 20170910-Full
    ELECTROTECHNICA & ELECTRONICA E+E Vol. 52. No 9-10/2017 Monthly scientific and technical journal Published by: The Union of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications /CEEC/, BULGARIA Editor-in-chief: C O N T E N T S Prof. Ivan Yatchev, Bulgaria TELECOMMUNICATIONS SCIENCE Deputy Editor-in-chief: Assoc. Prof. Seferin Mirtchev, Bulgaria Zdravka Tchobanova Editorial Board: Cooperative spectrum sensing - overview 1 Prof. Anatoliy Aleksandrov, Bulgaria Acad. Prof. Chavdar Rumenin, Bulgaria Stanimir Sadinov Prof. Christian Magele, Austria Simulation study and analysis in transmitting Prof. Georgi Stoyanov, Bulgaria RZ and NRZ coded signals into 10 Gbps optical line Assoc. Prof. Evdokia Sotirova, Bulgaria with optical amplifying sections 9 Prof. Ewen Ritchie, Denmark Prof. Hannes Toepfer, Germany ELECTRONICS Dr. Hartmut Brauer, Germany Prof. Marin Hristov, Bulgaria Kiril Ivanov Prof. Maurizio Repetto, Italy Plasma sterilization – special features Prof. Mihail Antchev, Bulgaria and new approaches in medical applications 15 Prof. Nikolay Mihailov, Bulgaria Prof. Radi Romansky, Bulgaria INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES Prof. Rosen Vasilev, Bulgaria Prof. Takeshi Tanaka, Japan Elena Shoikova, Anatoly Peshev Prof. Ventsislav Valchev, Bulgaria Best practices for designing user experience Dr. Vladimir Shelyagin, Ukraine for Internet of Things and virtual reality 22 Acad. Prof. Yuriy I. Yakymenko, Ukraine Assoc. Prof. Zahari Zarkov, Bulgaria APPLICATION IN PRACTICE Advisory Board: Prof. Dimitar Rachev, Bulgaria Milan Stankov Prof. Emil Sokolov, Bulgaria From electrica to invariant automatic Corr. Member Prof. Georgi Mladenov, Bulgaria (Or how to use the knowledge about Theory of electricity Prof. Ivan Dotsinski, Bulgaria for enter into Theory of invariant automatic control). Assoc. Prof. Ivan Vassilev, Bulgaria Part two: Electromechanical dualism. Assoc. Prof. Ivan Shishkov, Bulgaria Universality of energetic equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Representation in Bicategories of Relations
    Knowledge Representation in Bicategories of Relations Evan Patterson Department of Statistics, Stanford University Abstract We introduce the relational ontology log, or relational olog, a knowledge repre- sentation system based on the category of sets and relations. It is inspired by Spivak and Kent’s olog, a recent categorical framework for knowledge representation. Relational ologs interpolate between ologs and description logic, the dominant for- malism for knowledge representation today. In this paper, we investigate relational ologs both for their own sake and to gain insight into the relationship between the algebraic and logical approaches to knowledge representation. On a practical level, we show by example that relational ologs have a friendly and intuitive—yet fully precise—graphical syntax, derived from the string diagrams of monoidal categories. We explain several other useful features of relational ologs not possessed by most description logics, such as a type system and a rich, flexible notion of instance data. In a more theoretical vein, we draw on categorical logic to show how relational ologs can be translated to and from logical theories in a fragment of first-order logic. Although we make extensive use of categorical language, this paper is designed to be self-contained and has considerable expository content. The only prerequisites are knowledge of first-order logic and the rudiments of category theory. 1. Introduction The representation of human knowledge in computable form is among the oldest and most fundamental problems of artificial intelligence. Several recent trends are stimulating continued research in the field of knowledge representation (KR). The birth of the Semantic Web [BHL01] in the early 2000s has led to new technical standards and motivated new machine learning techniques to automatically extract knowledge from unstructured text [Nic+16].
    [Show full text]
  • Using Category Theory to Facilitate Multiple Manufacturing Service Database Integration
    Using Category Theory to facilitate multiple manufacturing service database integration Ryan Wisnesky, Spencer Breiner, Albert Jones, David I. Spivak, Eswaran Subrahmanian Ryan Wisnesky Categorical Informatics Cambridge, MA, USA Email: [email protected] Spencer Breiner Software and Systems Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) Gaithersburg, MD, USA Email: [email protected] Albert Jones Systems Integration Division Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) Gaithersburg, MD, USA Email:[email protected] David I. Spivak Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139 Email:[email protected] Eswaran Subrahmanian Institute for Complex Engineered Systems and Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 [email protected] Corresponding Author: Eswaran Subrahmanian, Software and Systems Division, National institute of Standards and Technology, Mail Stop 8970, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Email: [email protected] . Using Category Theory to facilitate multiple manufacturing service portal integration Abstract The goal of this paper is to illustrate the use of category theory as a basis for the integration of supply chain databases. We begin by discussing existing work on using OWL ontologies to integrate supply chain databases. In this paper we use as our reference prior work by Kolvatunyu et.al (2013) on the use of OWL-based semantic web tools to study the integration of different manufacturing service capability (MSC) databases using a generic-model approach that they propose in their paper. We approach the same task using a different set of tools, specifically category theory and FQL, a functorial query language based on categorical mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for an Embodied Rhetoric of Professional Practice
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Guttman Community College 2002 Writing an Important Body of Scholarship: A Proposal for an Embodied Rhetoric of Professional Practice Jane Hindman CUNY Guttman Community College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/nc_pubs/71 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Writing an Important Body of Scholarship: A Proposal for an Embodied Rhetoric of Professional Practice Jane E. Hindman I begin my reasoning and reflecting (as I almost always do) in the throes of contradiction. On this occasion, the inconsistency concerns our profes sional standing. I'm not gesturing to the oft-mentioned conflict between our institutional status as gatekeepers of Standard Written English and our disciplinary claim to be oppositional intellectuals. That paradox does indeed deserve attention and plays a significant role in my inquiry, but as a point of departure I want to explore a puzzling discrepancy between the content of our disciplinary arguments and the discursive moves that enable them. My hope is that the exploration will reveal the ideological constraints of the abstract, rationalist, disembodied rhetoric our profes sion usually demands. Since it is by definition constrained by the logic of noncontradiction and by professional standards, that rhetoric mystifies the professional practices that authorize it. Such mystification of our discourse renders us vulnerable to Jack Selzer's charge that "the relationship of rhetorical events to the material world that sustains and produces them has not often enough been fully elaborated or clearly articulated" (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impact of Open Access on Museum Image Use Policy
    ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ON MUSEUM IMAGE USE POLICY A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree 3< o J io f t Master of Arts m r In Museum Studies by Ian Matthew Gill San Francisco, California May 2017 Copyright by Ian Matthew Gill 2017 198 Appendix 1: Survey Contact Script Ian Gill, Graduate Candidate Museum Studies Program San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Ave. San Francisco, CA 94132 (415) 338-2176 [email protected] November 17, 2016 «FirstName» «LastName», «Title» «Company» «Address1» «City», «State» «PostalCode» Dear «FirstName», My name is Ian Gill and I am conducting a project on the online presentation of collections information in U.S. museums, specifically as it relates to institutional image use and reproduction policies. The information gathered will be used to analyze museum practice in these areas, and situate them within the context of the burgeoning “Open Access” movement. I am hoping that I might have approximately ten minutes of your time to complete the enclosed survey. The data collected from this survey will be used for the completion of a Master of Arts degree in Museum Studies at San Francisco State University. You have been contacted because you are a registrar or information manager working with collections at an AAM-accredited Art Museum. If you agree to complete the survey, please understand that any information provided by you may appear in the final written thesis. However, note that you need not supply any information on the response that links your museum to the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • An Expert System for Loan Decisions
    COSC460 Honours Project Report Department of Computer Science University of Canterbury An Expert System for Loan Decisions By Lawrence Ang 1987 Supervisor : Dr. Wolfgang Kreutzer Honours Project Report LOANEX Acknowledgements I wish to thank the following persons : Dr Wolfgang Kreutzer, my supervisor, for his advice on various aspects of this project; Mr Robin Whitmore, of United, for creating this project and agreeing to provide the PC for development; Dr Graeme Black, of United, for providing technical assistance and liason; Mr Norman Farquhar, of United, for his patience in explaining the problems about mortgages and loans to me; and the staff of United Cashel Branch for allowing me to sit in at the loan interviews that they were conducting. And finally but not least, I wish to thank my wife, Trindy, for her encouragement and love. Honours Project Report LOANEX Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ..................................................................... 1 2. Approach taken to the Project .... .. .... .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. ...... .... ......... 2 3. Specification of the Problem .................................................. 3 4. Initial Investigation (Feasibility Study) ...................................... 5 4.1 Desirable Features of an Expert System ... ... ......... ......... ...... 5 4.2 Drawbacks of Existing Expert Systems .................... .. .. ... ... 6 4.3 Pros And Cons of Expert Systems .................................... 7 4.4 Reviews of some Expert Systems .... ..... .......... ...... ... ........
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Ologs: a Categorical Framework for Gene Ontology
    Gene ologs: a categorical framework for Gene Ontology Yanying Wu∗1,2 1Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, UK 2Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, UK Sept 26, 2019 Abstract Gene Ontology (GO) is the most important resource for gene func- tion annotation. It provides a way to unify biological knowledge across different species via a dynamic and controlled vocabulary. GO is now widely represented in the Semantic Web standard Web Ontology Lan- guage (OWL). OWL renders a rich logic constructs to GO but also has its limitations. On the other hand, olog is a different language for on- tology and it is based on category theory. Due to its solid mathematical background, olog can be rigorously formulated yet considerably expres- sive. These advantages make ologs complementary, if not better than, OWL. We therefore think it worthwhile to adopt ologs for GO and took an initial step in this work. arXiv:1909.11210v1 [q-bio.GN] 24 Sep 2019 ∗[email protected] 1 Introduction Despite the amazing diversity of life forms on earth, genomic sequencing revealed that many genes are actually conserved among different species. Therefore our knowledge of gene functions for one species can be transformed to another. How- ever, using natural language to describe gene function causes misunderstanding and thus is unsuitable for such knowledge transferring. Gene Ontology (GO) was created to fill in the gap. GO produces a set of dynamic controlled vo- cabulary for the annotation of gene functions, so that our understanding of different biological systems can be shared and communicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Ritual and Ritualistic Objects
    Religion, Ritual and Ritualistic Objects Edited by Albertina Nugteren Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Religions www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Religion, Ritual and Ritualistic Objects Religion, Ritual and Ritualistic Objects Special Issue Editor Albertina Nugteren MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editor Albertina Nugteren Tilburg University The Netherlands Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Religions (ISSN 2077-1444) from 2018 to 2019 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions/special issues/Ritual) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-752-0 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-753-7 (PDF) c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Preface to ”Religion, Ritual and Ritualistic Objects” ......................... ix Albertina Nugteren Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Religion, Ritual, and Ritualistic Objects’ Reprinted from: Religions 2019, 10, 163, doi:10.3390/rel10030163 ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Management Strategy Version: 300 Date: June 10, 2021 Author: the SEAS Vendor Submitted To: AHCA FX Program Administration Team
    AHCA Florida Health Care Connections (FX) T-4: Technical Management Strategy Version: 300 Date: June 10, 2021 Author: The SEAS Vendor Submitted To: AHCA FX Program Administration Team Revision History DATE VERSION DESCRIPTION AUTHOR T-4 Technical Management Strategy Initial Draft Rene Cabral, Steve 4/15/2018 001 Version Quante, Paul Moore T-4 Technical Management Strategy Revisions to Rene Cabral, Steve 5/17/2018 002 Agency Review Quante, Paul Moore T-4 Technical Management Strategy Revisions for 5/24/2018 003 Steve Quante Final Draft T-4 Technical Management Strategy baseline 5/25/2018 100 Sean Gibbs version Annual Update including FX to MES, description of disaster recovery coordination role, audit log Paul Moore, Som 5/24/2019 101 handling and strategy on use of form filling Khot, Mike Griffiths applications Paul Moore, Mike 8/14/2019 102 T-4 updates based on comments from AHCA Griffiths, Steve Ruszkowski T-4 Technical Management Strategy approved 8/21/2019 200 Carol Williams deliverable refresh Prashant Zaveri, T-4 Technical Management Strategy Annual 3/24/2021 201 Steve Ruszkowski, Refresh Rob Bright T-4 Technical Management Strategy Annual 4/14/2021 202 Refresh – remediation/updates based on Agency Steve Ruszkowski review comments T-4 Technical Management Strategy approved 4/21/2021 250 Carol Williams deliverable refresh T-4 Technical Management Strategy deliverable draft refresh updates made: 5/20/2021 251 ▪ Removed recommendation that vendors Steve Ruszkowski have to deploy in the GovCloud ▪ Corrected that EDW and IS/IP are not currently hosted in the GovCloud T-4 Technical Management Strategy deliverable 6/10/2021 300 Carol Williams refresh approved final Modifications to the approved baseline version (100) of this artifact must be made in accordance with the FX Artifact Management Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • EGU2020 Presentation
    Data Management for Early Career Scientists – How to Tame the Elephant Laia Comas-Bru 1 and Marcus Schmidt 2 1. University of Reading, UK Workshop Topics 2. University of Goettingen, Germany Trainers Feedback Legacy The World Data System (WDS) organised a 3-day EGU- sponsored workshop at Institut de Physique du Globe in Paris, France, on current achievements and future challenges in Data Management in November 2019. Purpose To gain practical skills in data curation and management. Training took the form of lectures and group discussions, plus working on individual problems. Although possible topics were suggested in advance, the final content of the training was tailored to the expectations stated in the registration forms. Participants 23 Early Career Researchers and Scientists from 14 different countries. Participants were invited to attend by the WDS Scientific Committee after selection from more than 100 applicants. To Research Data Management Training Workshop topics What are Data Research World Café Management Data? Plans Research How to Open Science Data Exchange and Data Management Data Ontologies Copyright and Data and Knowledge Repositories Plagiarism Networks Cloud Big Data Platforms in Science The World WDS ECR Data Network System Back to Start Feedback intro Topics tackled during workshop What are Research Data « facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis » Data? Notion of usefulness (What to keep?) Dependant on the project involved but also on the scientific community practises Research data? • Scientific Domain • Origin (e.g., academic, company, citizen science, mixed origin…) • Type: primary data (raw), secondary data (easy to go back to raw data), data products (with significant processing), non-standard outputs (lab or field protocols, codes, etc) • Shape/format: numerical data (audio-visual) or physical data (samples) • “Granularity”: finite dataset (e.g.
    [Show full text]