Download (8MB)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (8MB) https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE USE OF SPIDER SILK IN THE NESTS OF SMALL BIRDS, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE CHAFFINCH (FRINGILLA COELEBS). A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of Glasgow, for the degree of Master of Science by Nicholas P Storer May 1991 ProQuest Number: 11011423 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11011423 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 CQN1EN15. SUMMARY. CHAPTER 1 . INTRODUCTION................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. CHAFFINCH BREEDING BIOLOGY................................... 5 2.1) The structure of chaffinch nests.............................. 5 2.2) The construction of nests by chaffinches...................... 6 2.3) Chaffinch territories.......................................... 7 2.4) The timing of chaffinch breeding seasons...................... 7 2.4.1) Geographical variation in the timing of breeding....... 9 2.5) Time and energy budgets of chaffinches during the breeding season... 10 2.6) Reasons for nest abandonment by chaffinches.................. 11 2.7) The importance of the nest to breeding success............... 12 CHAPTER 3. SPIDERS AND THEIR SILK........................................ 14 3.1) Spider classification........................................... 14 3.2) Spider silk production......................................... 17 3.2.1) Silk glands and the different types of silk............ 18 3.2.2) The orb web - an example of different silks in one structure... 23 3.3) Amino-acid composition of silk............. 25 3.4) Physical properties of silk..................................... 28 3.4.1) Strength and extensibility of silk........ 28 3.4.1.1) Determinants of thread diameter................... 31 3.4.2) Adhesiveness of spider silk............................. 34 3.4.3) Summary of the properties of silk...................... 36 3.5) Silken structures.............................................. 36 3.5.1) The webs, retreats and cocoons of 7 important families 39 CHAPTER 4. INTRODUCTION TO INVESTIGATIONS OF CHAFFINCH NESTS AND SILK... 46 CHAPTER 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS......................... 48 5.1) Study site...................................................... 48 5.2) Timing of chaffinch breeding at Garscube Estate.............. 48 5.3) Investigation of chaffinch nests............................... 49 5.3.1) Sources used to obtain the nests........................ 49 5.3.2) Examination of the materials in each nest.............. 51 5.3.3) Silk content and use in the nests...................... 52 5.4) Silk identification............................................. 53 5.4.1) Characterisation of silk from spiders at Garscube Estate.... 53 5.4.2) Identification of unknown silk taken from nests....... 54 5.5) Silk availability............................................... 55 5.5.1) Year-round survey of webs, retreats and cocoons....... 55 5.5.1.1) Effect of time-of-day on silk count.............. 57 5.5.2) Investigation of the turnover of retreats and cocoons.... 57 CHAPTER 6. RESULTS......................................................... 58 6.1) Timing of chaffinch breeding at Garscube Estate.............. 58 6.2) Investigation of chaffinch nests.............................. 61 6.2.1) Nest dimensions.......................................... 61 6.2.2) Investigation of the materials in each nest............ 61 6.2.2. 1) Nests built by the same female.................... 62 6.2.2.2) Effects of timing of nest-building................ 63 6.2.3) The silk content of nests............................... 63 6.2.3.1) Distribution of silk through the nests........... 63 6.2.3.2) Effect of nest size upon number of silk units 64 6.2.3.3) Materials to which silk is attached.............. 64 6.2.3.4) Correlations between silk and other materials 65 6.2.3.5) Silk distribution between the materials.......... 66 6.2.3.6) Differences in the extent of the use of web and cocoon silk.... 66 6.2.3.7) Correlations of web and cocoon with lichen, wood and bark.... 66 6.2.3.8) Differences between web and cocoon in use in Layer B .... 67 6.2.3.9) Comparison of wool with silk....................... 67 6.3) Spider silk identification............................... 68 6.3.1) Characterisation of silk from Garscube spiders... 68 6.3.1. 1) The spider species whose silk was examined....... 68 6.3.1.2) Spider web characterisation....................... 68 6.3.1.3) Spider cocoon characterisation.................... 69 6.3.2) Examination of silk samples collected from nests...... 71 6.3.2.1) Web silk from nests................................ 71 6.3.2.2) Cocoon silk from nests............................. 71 6.4) Silk availability.............................................. 72 6.4.1) Spiders present at Garscube Estate..................... 72 6.4.2) Year-round survey of webs, retreats and cocoons....... 72 6.4.2.1) Combined results from all sites examined......... 72 6.4.2.2) Site-by-site breakdown............................. 74 6.4.2.3) Effect of time of day..................... 76 6.4.3) Turnover of cocoons and retreats.................. 77 CHAPTER 7. CHAFFINCH NEST STRUCTURE AND THE USE OF SILK............... 78 7.1) The nesting materials employed................................. 78 7.2) Silk as a chaffinch nesting material........................... 85 CHAPTER 8. IDENTIFICATION OF SILK UNITS FROM CHAFFINCH NESTS............. 93 8.1) Types of silk found............................................ 93 8.1.1) Types of web silk found................................. 93 8.1.2) Types of cocoon silk found.............................. 94 8.2) Problems with the method of identification.................... 96 CHAPTER 9. FACTORS AFFECTING CHOICE OF SILK BY CHAFFINCHES............. 98 9.1) Abundance of silk through the year............................ 98 9.1.1) Web silk changes through the year.................... 98 9 .1.1 .1) Orb webs.......................................... 98 9.1.1.2) Sheet webs........................................ 99 9.1.1.3) Irregular webs................................... 100 9.1.1.4) Cribellate webs.................................. 100 9.1.2) Cocoon and retreat number changes through the year 101 9.1.3) Comparability of successive web counts................. 102 9.1.4) Limitations of the data in representing the whole environment.... 103 9.2) Relative availability of silk types during the chaffinch breeding season.... 104 9.2.1) Web silk............................................... 104 9.2.2) Cocoon silk............................................ 106 9.3) Relative suitability of silk types during the chaffinch breeding season.... 107 9.3.1) Web silk............................................... 107 9.3.2) Cocoon silk............................................ 108 9.4) Summary of factors affecting chaffinch choice of silk....... 108 CHAPTER 10. EFFECT OF SILK USE UPON CHAFFINCH...... BEHAVIOUR............ 110 10.1) Effect upon the methods used in searching for nest materials 110 10.1.1) Web collection.......................................... 110 10.1.2) Cocoon collection....................................... Ill 10.2) Silk availability and the location of chaffinch territories 113 10.3) Silk availability and the timing of chaffinch nesting......... 114 CHAPTER 11. CONCLUSIONS 120 11.1) What makes spider silk such a widespread nesting material?... 120 11.2) How is silk used in the nests of chaffinches?........ 123 11.3) What types of silk are used by chaffinches?........... 124 11.4) Could silk availability limit the time or place of nesting? 125 11.5) Improvements and extensions to the method............. 126 11.5.1) Information on the nests examined...................... 126 11.5.2) Silk identification.................................... 127 11.5.3) Silk survey methods.................................... 129 11.5.4) Investigations into chaffinch behaviour................. 130 11.5.5) Summary................................................. 130 11.6) Wider implications of this study - other birds....... 130 11.7) Relationship between silk in nests and webs as a food source.... 134 REFERENCES.......................................................... 135 APPENDIX A. DETAILS
Recommended publications
  • Spider Biodiversity Patterns and Their Conservation in the Azorean
    Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (2): 249–282 Issued 6 June 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002648 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum ∗ Paulo A.V. Borges1 & Joerg Wunderlich2 Spider biodiversity patterns and their 1Azorean Biodiversity Group, Departamento de Ciˆencias conservation in the Azorean archipelago, Agr´arias, CITA-A, Universidade dos Ac¸ores. Campus de Angra, with descriptions of new species Terra-Ch˜a; Angra do Hero´ısmo – 9700-851 – Terceira (Ac¸ores); Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Oberer H¨auselbergweg 24, Abstract In this contribution, we report on patterns of spider species diversity of 69493 Hirschberg, Germany. the Azores, based on recently standardised sampling protocols in different hab- Email: joergwunderlich@ t-online.de itats of this geologically young and isolated volcanic archipelago. A total of 122 species is investigated, including eight new species, eight new records for the submitted December 2005 Azorean islands and 61 previously known species, with 131 new records for indi- accepted November 2006 vidual islands. Biodiversity patterns are investigated, namely patterns of range size distribution for endemics and non-endemics, habitat distribution patterns, island similarity in species composition and the estimation of species richness for the Azores. Newly described species are: Oonopidae – Orchestina furcillata Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Linyphiinae – Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich; Turinyphia cavernicola Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Micronetinae – Agyneta depigmentata Wunderlich; Linyph- iidae:
    [Show full text]
  • Programa De Doutoramento Em Biologia ”Dinâmica Das
    Universidade de Evora´ - Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~aoAvan¸cada Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Tese de Doutoramento "Din^amicadas comunidades de grupos selecionados de artr´opodes terrestres nas ´areasemergentes da Barragem de Alqueva (Alentejo: Portugal) Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Orientador(es) j Diogo Francisco Caeiro Figueiredo Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges Evora´ 2020 Universidade de Evora´ - Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~aoAvan¸cada Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Tese de Doutoramento "Din^amicadas comunidades de grupos selecionados de artr´opodes terrestres nas ´areasemergentes da Barragem de Alqueva (Alentejo: Portugal) Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Orientador(es) j Diogo Francisco Caeiro Figueiredo Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges Evora´ 2020 A tese de doutoramento foi objeto de aprecia¸c~aoe discuss~aop´ublicapelo seguinte j´urinomeado pelo Diretor do Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~ao Avan¸cada: Presidente j Luiz Carlos Gazarini (Universidade de Evora)´ Vogais j Am´aliaMaria Marques Espirid~aode Oliveira (Universidade de Evora)´ Artur Raposo Moniz Serrano (Universidade de Lisboa - Faculdade de Ci^encias) Fernando Manuel de Campos Trindade Rei (Universidade de Evora)´ M´arioRui Canelas Boieiro (Universidade dos A¸cores) Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges (Universidade dos A¸cores) (Orientador) Pedro Segurado (Universidade T´ecnicade Lisboa - Instituto Superior de Agronomia) Evora´ 2020 IV Ilhas. Trago uma comigo in visível, um pedaço de matéria isolado e denso, que se deslocou numa catástrofe da idade média. Enquanto ilha, não carece de mar. Nem de nuvens passageiras. Enquanto fragmento, só outra catástrofe a devolveria ao corpo primitivo. Dora Neto V VI AGRADECIMENTOS Os momentos e decisões ao longo da vida tornaram-se pontos de inflexão que surgiram de um simples fascínio pelos invertebrados, reminiscência de infância passada na quinta dos avós maternos, para se tornar numa opção científica consubstanciada neste documento.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme and Abstracts European Congress of Arachnology - Brno 2 of Arachnology Congress European Th 2 9
    Sponsors: 5 1 0 2 Programme and Abstracts European Congress of Arachnology - Brno of Arachnology Congress European th 9 2 Programme and Abstracts 29th European Congress of Arachnology Organized by Masaryk University and the Czech Arachnological Society 24 –28 August, 2015 Brno, Czech Republic Brno, 2015 Edited by Stano Pekár, Šárka Mašová English editor: L. Brian Patrick Design: Atelier S - design studio Preface Welcome to the 29th European Congress of Arachnology! This congress is jointly organised by Masaryk University and the Czech Arachnological Society. Altogether 173 participants from all over the world (from 42 countries) registered. This book contains the programme and the abstracts of four plenary talks, 66 oral presentations, and 81 poster presentations, of which 64 are given by students. The abstracts of talks are arranged in alphabetical order by presenting author (underlined). Each abstract includes information about the type of presentation (oral, poster) and whether it is a student presentation. The list of posters is arranged by topics. We wish all participants a joyful stay in Brno. On behalf of the Organising Committee Stano Pekár Organising Committee Stano Pekár, Masaryk University, Brno Jana Niedobová, Mendel University, Brno Vladimír Hula, Mendel University, Brno Yuri Marusik, Russian Academy of Science, Russia Helpers P. Dolejš, M. Forman, L. Havlová, P. Just, O. Košulič, T. Krejčí, E. Líznarová, O. Machač, Š. Mašová, R. Michalko, L. Sentenská, R. Šich, Z. Škopek Secretariat TA-Service Honorary committee Jan Buchar,
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologiske Meddelelser
    Entomologiske Meddelelser Indeks for Bind 1-67 (1887-1999) Entomologisk Forening København 2000 FORORD Tidsskriftet "Entomologiske Meddelelser" - Entomologisk Forenings medlemsblad - blev grundlagt i 1887, og er således det ældste danske entomologiske tidsskrift, som stadig udgives. Det har siden sin start haft til formål at udbrede kendskabet til entomologien i almindelighed og dansk entomologi i særdeleshed. De første 5 bind udkom i årene 1887-1896 og omhandlede primært artikler af særlig relevans for dansk entomologi. Herefter skiftede det format, såvel rent fysisk som (mere gradvis) indholdsmæssigt, og fik efterhånden et mere internationalt tilsnit med en vis andel af bl.a. tysk- og engelsksprogede artikler. I forbindelse med overgangen til det nye format, benævntes tidsskriftet nu som "Entomologiske Meddelelser, 2. Række" og nummereringen af de enkelte bind startede forfra. Efter at have praktiseret denne nummerering i nogle år, droppedes dog betegnelsen "2. Række", og man vendte tilbage til at nummerere bindene fortløbende fra det først udkomne bind. Efter at tidsskriftet op igennem 1900-tallet havde fået et stigende indhold af artikler med internationalt sigte, blev det fra bind 39 (1971) besluttet at koncentrere indholdet til primært dansksprogede artikler af særlig relevans for den danske fauna. Samtidig overgik de enkelte bind til at udgøre årgange i stedet for, som tidligere, at være flerårige. "Entomologiske Meddelelser" har siden sin start bragt hen mod 1600 originale, videnskabelige artikler eller mindre meddelelser, næsten 500 boganmeldelser, over 100 biografier eller nekrologer over primært danske entomologer, samt enkelte meddelelser af anden slags. For at lette overskueligheden over den meget betydelige mængde af information disse publikationer rummer, har Entomologisk Forenings bestyrelse fundet tiden moden til at sammenstille et indeks over indholdet af samtlige udkomne numre af "Entomologiske Meddelser" til og med bind 67 (årgang 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 67(1), pp. 63–76, 2021 https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.67.1.63.2021 NEW FAUNISTIC AND TAXONOMIC NOTES ON THE HAPLOGYNE AND CRIBELLATE SPIDERS (ARANEAE: DICTYNIDAE, DYSDERIDAE, ERESIDAE, FILISTATIDAE, SICARIIDAE) FROM THREE BALKAN COUNTRIES Maria Naumova1 and Christo Deltshev1, 2 1Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 1 Tzar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria E-mail: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0060-048X 2National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria E-mail: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-5673 In this paper, we report for the first time two spider species for Albania, four for Bulgaria and two for Greece: Altella lucida (Simon, 1874) (Bulgaria), Eresus moravicus Rezác, 2008 (Bulgaria and Greece), Filistata insidiatrix (Forsskål, 1775) (Albania), Harpactea samuili La- zarov, 2006 (Greece), Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour, 1820) (Albania), Pritha parva Legittimo, Simeon, Di Pompeo et Kulczycki, 2017 (Bulgaria) and Pritha vestita (Simon, 1873) (Bulgaria). The recently described species P. parva is the first report for the Balkan Peninsula, while P. vestita is the first record for mainland Europe. Their congener Pritha nana (Simon, 1868) is removed from the Bulgarian checklist of spiders (misidentification). As a result of our report, the number of spider species increases to 571, 1049 and 1183 in Albania, Bulgaria and Greece, respectively. Keywords: Araneae, Albania, Arachnida, Bulgaria, Greece, checklist update. INTRODUCTION Although the Balkan Peninsula is well known as a biodiversity hotspot, especially from arachnological perspective, it is still unequally explored (Grif- fiths et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Relationships Within the Spider Family Filistatidae (Araneae: Araneomorphae)
    I\ecords of the Western AlIstra/lan MlIsellm Supplement No. 52: 79~89 (1995). Morphology and relationships within the spider family Filistatidae (Araneae: Araneomorphae) Michael R. Gray Arachnology Section, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Australian Museum, P.G. Box A285, Sydney South, New South Wales 2000, Australia Abstract - The morphology and generic relationships of the filistatid spiders are discussed, with emphasis upon genitalic and silk spinning structures. A c1adistic analysis of generic relationships is presented and two new subfamily groupings are recognised. These are the Filistatinae (Filistata, Kukulcania, Sahastata and, provisionally, Zaituna), and the Prithinae, subfam. novo (Pritha, Wandella, Yardiella, Andoharano, Afrofilistata, Pikelinia, Filistatoides, Filistatinella). The taxonomic validity of the prithine genera Malalistata and Tricalanws are questioned. The affinities of the enigmatic central Asian genus Microfilistata remain obscure. INTRODUCTION cribellate sister group of the remaining ecribellate haplogyne families. The Filistatidae are cribellate haplogyne spiders This paper is dedicated to Dr Barbara York Main, possessing an intriguing mixture of primitive and in recognition of her remarkable contribution to specialised characters. Despite their extensive arachnological research in Australia. Through her circum-tropical/warm temperate distribution they research, her encouragement of the work of comprise a relatively small group of 14 genera, students and colleagues and her promotion of the including two recently described from Australia (Gray 1994). importance of arachnological studies, she has greatly enhanced the reputation of Australian The peculiar structural features of the filistatid arachnology. spiders have made elucidation of their family relationships difficult. Their silk spinning structures are particularly striking - the peculiar TAXONOMY annulate sculpturing of the spinneret spigot shafts Generic relationships within the Filistatidae have (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • American Museum Novitates
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3930, 24 pp. June 26, 2019 Myrmecicultoridae, a New Family of Myrmecophilic Spiders from the Chihuahuan Desert (Araneae: Entelegynae) MARTÍN J. RAMÍREZ,1 CRISTIAN J. GRISMADO,1 DARRELL UBICK,2 VLADIMIR OVTSHARENKO,3 PAULA E. CUSHING,4 NORMAN I. PLATNICK,5 WARD C. WHEELER,5 LORENZO PRENDINI,5 LOUISE M. CROWLEY,5 AND NORMAN V. HORNER6 ABSTRACT The new genus and species Myrmecicultor chihuahuensis Ramírez, Grismado, and Ubick is described and proposed as the type of the new family, Myrmecicultoridae Ramírez, Grismado, and Ubick. The species is ecribellate, with entelegyne genitalia, two tarsal claws, without claw tufts, and the males have a retrolateral palpal tibial apophysis. Some morphological characters suggest a pos- sible relationship with Zodariidae or Prodidomidae, but the phylogenetic analysis of six markers from the mitochondrial (12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase subunit I) and nuclear (histone H3, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA) genomes indicate that M. chihuahuensis is a separate lineage emerging near the base of the Dionycha and the Oval Calamistrum clade. The same result is obtained when the molecular data are combined with a dataset of morphological characters. Specimens of M. chi- huahuensis were found associated with three species of harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex rugosus, Novomessor albisetosis, and Novomessor cockerelli, and were collected in pitfall traps when the ants are most active. The known distribution spans the Big Bend region of Texas (Presidio, Brewster, and Hudspeth counties), to Coahuila (Cuatro Ciénegas) and Aguascalientes (Tepezalá), Mexico. 1 Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” – CONICET, Buenos Aires. 2 California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2008___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2008___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, paleobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept “hard” versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis on Cave-Dwelling Spiders in Europe 2 3 Stefano Mammola1, Pedro Cardoso2, Carles Ribera3, Martina Pavlek3,4,5, Marco Isaia1,*
    1 A synthesis on cave-dwelling spiders in Europe 2 3 Stefano Mammola1, Pedro Cardoso2, Carles Ribera3, Martina Pavlek3,4,5, Marco Isaia1,* 4 5 Authors for correspondence: 6 * [email protected]; phone 0116704544 7 1. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy 8 2. Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 9 3. Biodiversity Research Institute and Department of Animal Biology, University of 10 Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 11 4. Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia 12 5. Croatian Biospeleological Society, Zagreb, Croatia 13 14 15 Running title: European cave spiders checklist 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 29 Abstract 30 We provide the first overview on spiders living in subterranean habitats in Europe, 31 including the first European subterranean spider checklist. In Europe there are 486 spider 32 species known to dwell in caves and other subterranean habitats, distributed across 22 33 families. Despite a few species being able to colonize caves across the whole continent, 34 approximately 90% of the species show a restricted distribution, occurring exclusively in 35 one or two countries. From a biogeographic perspective, Southern Europe emerges as the 36 main hot spot of subterranean spider diversity, showing the highest richness of endemic 37 species. Compared to other temperate regions of the world, some families appear to be 38 well represented and other poorly represented (or lacking) in European subterranean 39 habitats. Overall, it appears that the taxonomical knowledge on subterranean spiders in 40 Europe is sufficient, but not evenly distributed.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Breaking Achievements by Spiders and the Scientists Who Study Them
    Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them Stefano Mammola1,2, Peter Michalik3, Eileen A. Hebets4 and Marco Isaia1,2 1 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy 2 IUCN SSC Spider and Scorpion Specialist Group, Torino, Italy 3 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universita¨t Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 4 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA ABSTRACT Organismal biology has been steadily losing fashion in both formal education and scientific research. Simultaneous with this is an observable decrease in the connection between humans, their environment, and the organisms with which they share the planet. Nonetheless, we propose that organismal biology can facilitate scientific observation, discovery, research, and engagement, especially when the organisms of focus are ubiquitous and charismatic animals such as spiders. Despite being often feared, spiders are mysterious and intriguing, offering a useful foundation for the effective teaching and learning of scientific concepts and processes. In order to provide an entryway for teachers and students—as well as scientists themselves—into the biology of spiders, we compiled a list of 99 record breaking achievements by spiders (the “Spider World Records”). We chose a world- record style format, as this is known to be an effective way to intrigue readers of all ages. We highlighted, for example, the largest and smallest spiders, the largest prey eaten, the fastest runners, the highest fliers, the species with the longest sperm, the most venomous species, and many more. We hope that our compilation will inspire science educators to embrace the biology of spiders as a resource that engages Submitted 14 June 2017 students in science learning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spider Family Filistatidae (Araneae) in Iran
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 516: 123–135 (2015) The spider family Filistatidae( Araneae) in Iran 123 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.516.10146 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The spider family Filistatidae (Araneae) in Iran Yuri M. Marusik1,2,3, Alireza Zamani4,5 1 Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan 685000, Russia 2 Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa 3 Far Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russia 4 Department of Animal Biology, School of Biology and Centre of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms in Iran, College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 5 Pars Plateau Zoologists Group, Iran Corresponding author: Alireza Zamani ([email protected]) Academic editor: Cor Vink | Received 15 June 2015 | Accepted 30 July 2015 | Published 10 August 2015 http://zoobank.org/73677C89-0268-4CE1-BFB4-1A38D355BE05 Citation: Marusik YM, Zamani A (2015) The spider family Filistatidae (Araneae) in Iran. ZooKeys 516: 123–135.doi: 10.3897/zookeys.516.10146 Abstract All species of Filistatidae occurring in Iran are surveyed. Zaitunia akhanii sp. n. is described on the basis of female specimens collected in Tehran province, and the previously unknown male of Sahastata sinuspersica Marusik, Zamani & Mirshamsi, 2014 is described for the first time. Also, the endogynes of the holotypes of Z. alexandri Brignoli, 1982, Z. medica Brignoli, 1982 and Z. persica Brignoli, 1982 are illustrated. Including these results, the number of Iranian species of Filistatidae is increased to seven, which indicates the highest species-richness of this family in the Western Palaearctic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spider Chelicerae: Some Problems of Origin and Evolution
    EUROPEAN ARACHNOLOGY 2003 (LOGUNOV D.V. & PENNEY D. eds.), pp. 349366. © ARTHROPODA SELECTA (Special Issue No.1, 2004). ISSN 0136-006X (Proceedings of the 21st European Colloquium of Arachnology, St.-Petersburg, 49 August 2003) The spider chelicerae: some problems of origin and evolution Õåëèöåðû ïàóêîâ: ïðîáëåìû ïðîèñõîæäåíèÿ è ýâîëþöèè S.L. ZONSTEIN Ñ.Ë. ÇÎÍØÒÅÉÍ Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, 69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel. email: [email protected] Îòäåë çîîëîãèè, Ôàêóëüòåò åñòåñòâåííûõ íàóê èì. Äæîðæ Ñ. Âèçå, Òåëü-Àâèâñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò, Òåëü- Àâèâ, Èçðàèëü. email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Some problems of the origin and evolution of the chelicerae in spiders are discussed. The enlargement and bending of the basal cheliceral segments combined with the displacement of the fang insertion point ventrad is recognized as the principal cheliceral modification observed in the Araneae. The chelicerae of the Liphistiidae and the Mygalomorphae are regarded as plesiomor- phic in their position and axial orientation, but as apomorphic by their configuration; the latter seems to be an evolutionary compromise caused by burrowing activity. The possibility of an origin of the labidognathous cheliceral construction from the specialized orthognathous chelicerae of liphistiids and mygalomorphs is regarded as improbable. ÐÅÇÞÌÅ.  ñòàòüå îáñóæäàþòñÿ âîïðîñû ïðîèñõîæäåíèÿ è ýâîëþöèè õåëèöåð ó ïàóêîâ. Îñíîâíûìè ìîäèôèêàöèÿìè õåëèöåð, íàáëþäàåìûìè ó îðòîãíàòíûõ ïàóêîâ, ïðèçíàþòñÿ óêðóïíåíèå è âûãèáàíèå îñíîâíûõ ÷ëåíèêîâ õåëèöåð è ñìåùåíèå òî÷êè ïðèêðåïëåíèÿ êîãîòêà íà èõ âåíòðàëüíóþ ñòîðîíó. Õåëèöåðû Liphistiidae è Mygalomorphae ïðèíèìàþòñÿ ïëåçèîìîðôíûìè ïî çàíèìàåìîìó ïîëîæåíèþ è îñåâîé îðèåíòàöèè, íî àïîìîðôíûìè ïî ñâîåé êîíôèãóðàöèè; ïîñëåäíÿÿ ïðåäñòàâëÿåòñÿ ðåçóëüòàòîì ýâîëþöèîííîãî êîìïðîìèññà, âûçâàííîãî ïåðåõîäîì ê íîðíîìó îáðàçó æèçíè.
    [Show full text]