DOCSLIB.ORG

Containing Shiite Militias: the Battle for Stability in Iraq

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

P B D C S M: T B S I R A Containing Shiite Militias: The Battle for Stability in Iraq Ranj Alaaldin The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha III Containing Shiite Militias: The Battle for Stability in Iraq Ranj Alaaldin1 The liberation of Mosul is complete. The so- the Badr Brigade), and his deputy, Abu Mahdi called Islamic State (ISIS) is unlikely to govern al-Muhandis (the head of Kataib Hezbollah). and control large swaths of territory any time They have functioned with autonomy over soon. However, while there are reasons to the past decade with considerable resources celebrate, the end of the so-called Caliphate and patronage from their sponsors in Tehran, does not mean the end of ISIS and militancy in and they have also capitalized on Sistani’s call Iraq. To make the liberation of Mosul count, the to arms to sustain, legitimize, and consolidate Iraqi government and its allies will now have to their presence. take on the more difficult long-term challenge of reconstructing the country and reconciling International organizations have accused its communities and political factions. One Iraq’s Shiite militias of committing sectarian particular challenge that could complicate atrocities and human rights abuses.2 Many such efforts is the ascendancy of Shiite militia have fought both Western coalition forces groups, which could soon use their popular and the Iraqi army in the past. Along with support to radically alter the political map of their sectarian discourse, and the substantial the country. support they receive from Iran, these militias have exacerbated sectarian tensions between Many of Iraq’s Shiite militias mobilized in Iraq’s Arab Sunnis and Shiites, which militant response to Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani’s groups like ISIS have exploited to swell their fatwa that called on all able-bodied Iraqis ranks. Shiite militias have also concerned to defend their country when the Iraqi army other sections of Iraqi society. This includes collapsed and Mosul fell to ISIS in June 2014. the Kurds, who have been engaged with the An umbrella militia organization known as the militias in a series of skirmishes in key disputed “Hashd al-Shaabi,” or Popular Mobilization territories, as well as those components of the Forces (PMF), was established in response. Shiite community that do not want Iraq to be On the surface, the PMF constitutes a state- dominated by unaccountable armed groups. sanctioned organization that reports to the federal government, but in practice, it is Reformist politicians, including Prime Minister dominated by Iran-aligned, pre-existing militia Haidar al-Abadi, have criticized militias that groups such as Asaib Ahl al-Haq, Kataib operate independently of the state and have Hezbollah, Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada, and called on them to disarm. However, these the Badr Brigade. These actors constitute the calls have been met with fierce resistance from spearhead of the organization and report to the militia factions, which have threatened its de facto leader, Hadi al-Amiri (the head of to reorganize independently if the institution 1 Ranj Alaaldin is a visiting fellow at the Brookings Doha Center (BDC). His research focuses on militia groups in Iraq and Syria, govern- ance, state-building, and post-conflict reconstruction in the MENA region. The author would like to thank Adel Abdel Ghafar, Nader Kabbani, and Firas Masri at the BDC for their support and feedback. The author would also like to gratefully acknowledge the support he has received from the BDC communications team, in particular Bahaa Omran, Sumaya Attia, and Francoise Freifer. 2 See for example Human Rights Watch, “Iraq: Ban Abusive Militias from Mosul Operation,” July 31, 2016, https://www.hrw.org/ news/2016/07/31/iraq-ban-abusive-militias-mosul-operation; Jeffrey Gettleman, “Bound, Blindfolded and Dead: The Face of Revenge in Baghdad,” New York Times, March 26, 2006; Amnesty International, “Absolute Impunity, Militia Rule in Iraq,” October 2014, https://www. amnesty.org.uk/files/absolute_impunity_iraq_report.pdf. 1 of the PMF is disbanded.3 Disarming and elections in 2009 and 2010. Therefore, the demobilizing Shiite militia groups is challenging ascendancy of Shiite militia groups (and their and complicated, not only because of their vast Iranian patrons) is not irresistible. Reversing numbers, autonomy, financial resources and their prominence once again requires a holistic arms, but also because of their support bases— approach and a greater appreciation of the due to their significant overlap and interactions complex web of interpersonal and inter- with the Iraqi state and society. organizational links that shape Iraq’s Shiite community. This policy briefing calls for a What compounds the challenge even further three-pronged strategy focused on helping is that Iran-aligned Shiite militias have already Iraqis reduce the space in which Shiite militias established themselves as quasi versions of operate by establishing an environment and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, having enjoyed the space culture of accountability. to do so as a result of the fragility of the Iraqi state and society over the past decade. In other First, the United States should shift its resources words, they have established themselves as away from the Iraqi state—specifically its socio-cultural movements that have military political class—and recalibrate its policies and social welfare wings and that operate toward the grassroots communal dynamics of independently of the state. Conversely, they the Shiite community. Moreover, the United have not yet amassed the same power and States should empower the array of state-aligned authority as their Lebanese counterparts. militias, tribes, and clerical figures whose Moreover, the PMF was institutionalized into political and ideological alignments, as well the Iraqi state only recently and now functions as their day-to-day interactions and discourse, parallel to a much weaker Iraqi military. This are characterized by pluralistic values and could result in Iraq elevating the PMF into hostility to Iranian interference. These actors its own version of the Iranian Revolutionary have been misunderstood and unappreciated Guards Council (IRGC). Therefore, it is by policymakers, but they display far-reaching not too late to either resolve the problem of influence and moral authority within the Shiite autonomous Shiite militias or, at least, contain community, which should be utilized. them in the coming years. Second, the United States should use its Iraq’s Shiite militias were once pushed to influence to ensure international resources are the margins after the Iraqi state and its directed toward Iraqi NGOs, humanitarian institutions—particularly its armed forces— organizations, and civil-society actors, which became more effective. With substantial U.S. generally have greater reach and credibility military support, the country was stabilized than international organizations. These local between 2008-2011, rendering Shiite militias actors are better positioned to nudge armed an unnecessary force. The militias were groups into respecting human rights and thereafter derided for their general lawlessness adopting basic international norms, but they and for committing human rights abuses. have received insufficient investment and The entities that aligned themselves with Iran remain vulnerable to becoming political fronts were punished at the provincial and national for corrupt elites.4 3 United States Institute of Peace, “Iraqi Prime Minister Abadi on U.S. Ties, War with ISIS,” March 20, 2017, https://www.usip.org/events/ iraqi-prime-minister-abadi-us-ties-war-isis; “Iraqi PM Haider al-Abadi Compares Shiite Militias to ISIS: We Did Not Fight the Baath Re- gime Only to be Ruled by Gangs,” MEMRI TV, May 20, 2017, https://www.memri.org/tv/iraqi-pm-abadi-slams-shiite-militias; Hayder al-Khoei, Twitter Post, July 8, 2017, https://twitter.com/Hayder_alKhoei/status/883461859717894145. 4 For studies on this, see Oliver Kaplan, “Nudging Armed Groups: How Civilians Transmit Norms of Protection,” Stability: International Journal of Security & Development (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/sta.cw. 2 Containing Shiite militias: The Battle for Stability in Iraq Finally, Shiite militias may have battlefield From this environment emerged Mohammed experience, but they are ill-equipped to engage Mohammed Sadeq al-Sadr, the founder of in governance and administration. In the the Sadrist movement that today, under the event that Shiite militia factions fail to deliver leadership of his son Muqtada, constitutes security and services to local communities, Iraq’s most powerful socio-political
Recommended publications
  • Hezbollah's Syrian Quagmire

    Hezbollah's Syrian Quagmire

    Hezbollah’s Syrian Quagmire BY MATTHEW LEVITT ezbollah – Lebanon’s Party of God – is many things. It is one of the dominant political parties in Lebanon, as well as a social and religious movement catering first and fore- Hmost (though not exclusively) to Lebanon’s Shi’a community. Hezbollah is also Lebanon’s largest militia, the only one to maintain its weapons and rebrand its armed elements as an “Islamic resistance” in response to the terms of the Taif Accord, which ended Lebanon’s civil war and called for all militias to disarm.1 While the various wings of the group are intended to complement one another, the reality is often messier. In part, that has to do with compartmen- talization of the group’s covert activities. But it is also a factor of the group’s multiple identities – Lebanese, pan-Shi’a, pro-Iranian – and the group’s multiple and sometimes competing goals tied to these different identities. Hezbollah insists that it is Lebanese first, but in fact, it is an organization that always acts out of its self-interests above its purported Lebanese interests. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, Hezbollah also has an “expansive global network” that “is sending money and operatives to carry out terrorist attacks around the world.”2 Over the past few years, a series of events has exposed some of Hezbollah’s covert and militant enterprises in the region and around the world, challenging the group’s standing at home and abroad. Hezbollah operatives have been indicted for the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri by the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) in The Hague,3 arrested on charges of plotting attacks in Nigeria,4 and convicted on similar charges in Thailand and Cyprus.5 Hezbollah’s criminal enterprises, including drug running and money laundering from South America to Africa to the Middle East, have been targeted by law enforcement and regulatory agen- cies.
  • The Resurgence of Asa'ib Ahl Al-Haq

    The Resurgence of Asa'ib Ahl Al-Haq

    December 2012 Sam Wyer MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 7 THE RESURGENCE OF ASA’IB AHL AL-HAQ Photo Credit: Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq protest in Kadhimiya, Baghdad, September 2012. Photo posted on Twitter by Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2012 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2012 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 Washington, DC 20036. http://www.understandingwar.org Sam Wyer MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 7 THE RESURGENCE OF ASA’IB AHL AL-HAQ ABOUT THE AUTHOR Sam Wyer is a Research Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, where he focuses on Iraqi security and political matters. Prior to joining ISW, he worked as a Research Intern at AEI’s Critical Threats Project where he researched Iraqi Shi’a militia groups and Iranian proxy strategy. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science from Middlebury College in Vermont and studied Arabic at Middlebury’s school in Alexandria, Egypt. ABOUT THE INSTITUTE The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization. ISW advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. ISW is committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve U.S.
  • Overall Security in Iraq

    Overall Security in Iraq

    HOW DOES THIS END? Strategic Failures Overshadow Tactical Gains in Iraq Lawrence Korb, Brian Katulis, Sean Duggan, and Peter Juul Center for American Progress April 2008 “Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War “No one” in the U.S. and Iraqi governments “feels that there has been sufficient progress by any means in the area of national reconciliation.” General David Petraeus, March 13, 2008.1 www.americanprogress.org Center for American Progress Introduction and Summary .S. Army General David Petraeus understood the situation perfectly five years ago. As an indigenous insurgency began to form in the weeks following the U.S. Uinvasion of Iraq in 2003, then-Major Gen. Petraeus asked Washington Post report- er Rick Atkinson the fundamental question of the war: “Tell me, how does this end?” After spending nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars, after more than 4,000 lost American lives alongside hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, this remains the central question of this war. Yet the answer to Gen. Petraeus’ question—a unified, independent, and stable Iraq that is an ally in the global war on terrorism—is more elusive today than it was when President Bush’s military escalation began in early 2007. Since the administration’s escalation began 15 months ago, the president and his con- servative allies in Congress have entangled the United States ever more deeply in Iraq’s multiple ethnic and sectarian conflicts. Some short-term security progress has been achieved in certain areas of Iraq.
  • Battle of MOSUL Data and Expectations

    Battle of MOSUL Data and Expectations

    Special Report Special Report فقوم ريدقت www.jusoor.co 1 October 2016 2016 سطسغأ Battle of MOSUL data and expectations Abdul Wahab Assi Battle of MOSUL data and expectations www.jusoor.co Special Report 2 Content Introduction: .............................................................................................................. 3 Strategic significance of Mosul: .................................................................................. 3 Geographical significance: ....................................................................................... 3 Political significance: ............................................................................................... 3 Social significance: .................................................................................................. 5 Military significance: ................................................................................................ 5 Time to talk about the battle of Mosul ......................................................................... 6 In military terms:...................................................................................................... 6 In political terms: ..................................................................................................... 7 Participating forces, or expect to participate: .............................................................. 9 Iraqi government and its supporting groups: ............................................................ 9 Peshmerga forces: ..................................................................................................
  • Blood and Ballots the Effect of Violence on Voting Behavior in Iraq

    Blood and Ballots the Effect of Violence on Voting Behavior in Iraq

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Göteborgs universitets publikationer - e-publicering och e-arkiv DEPTARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BLOOD AND BALLOTS THE EFFECT OF VIOLENCE ON VOTING BEHAVIOR IN IRAQ Amer Naji Master’s Thesis: 30 higher education credits Programme: Master’s Programme in Political Science Date: Spring 2016 Supervisor: Andreas Bågenholm Words: 14391 Abstract Iraq is a very diverse country, both ethnically and religiously, and its political system is characterized by severe polarization along ethno-sectarian loyalties. Since 2003, the country suffered from persistent indiscriminating terrorism and communal violence. Previous literature has rarely connected violence to election in Iraq. I argue that violence is responsible for the increases of within group cohesion and distrust towards people from other groups, resulting in politicization of the ethno-sectarian identities i.e. making ethno-sectarian parties more preferable than secular ones. This study is based on a unique dataset that includes civil terror casualties one year before election, the results of the four general elections of January 30th, and December 15th, 2005, March 7th, 2010 and April 30th, 2014 as well as demographic and socioeconomic indicators on the provincial level. Employing panel data analysis, the results show that Iraqi people are sensitive to violence and it has a very negative effect on vote share of secular parties. Also, terrorism has different degrees of effect on different groups. The Sunni Arabs are the most sensitive group. They change their electoral preference in response to the level of violence. 2 Acknowledgement I would first like to thank my advisor Dr.
  • The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq

    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq

    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq Julie Ahn—Maeve Campbell—Pete Knoetgen Client: Office of Iraq Affairs, U.S. Department of State Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Advisor: Meghan O’Sullivan Policy Analysis Exercise Seminar Leader: Matthew Bunn May 7, 2018 This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the authors and should not be viewed as representing the views of the US Government, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who helped us throughout the development, research, and drafting of this report. Our field work in Iraq would not have been possible without the help of Sherzad Khidhir. His willingness to connect us with in-country stakeholders significantly contributed to the breadth of our interviews. Those interviews were made possible by our fantastic translators, Lezan, Ehsan, and Younis, who ensured that we could capture critical information and the nuance of discussions. We also greatly appreciated the willingness of U.S. State Department officials, the soldiers of Operation Inherent Resolve, and our many other interview participants to provide us with their time and insights. Thanks to their assistance, we were able to gain a better grasp of this immensely complex topic. Throughout our research, we benefitted from consultations with numerous Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) faculty, as well as with individuals from the larger Harvard community. We would especially like to thank Harvard Business School Professor Kristin Fabbe and Razzaq al-Saiedi from the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative who both provided critical support to our project.
  • Iraq's Civil War, the Sadrists and the Surge

    Iraq's Civil War, the Sadrists and the Surge

    IRAQ’S CIVIL WAR, THE SADRISTS AND THE SURGE Middle East Report N°72 – 7 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. BAGHDAD’S CIVIL WAR AND THE SADRISTS’ ASCENT................................. 2 A. HOW THE SADRISTS EXPANDED THEIR TERRITORY ...............................................................2 B. NEUTRALISING THE POLICE...................................................................................................4 C. DEALING IN VIOLENCE..........................................................................................................6 III. THE SADRISTS’ REVERSAL OF FORTUNE .......................................................... 8 A. AN INCREASINGLY UNDISCIPLINED MOVEMENT ...................................................................8 B. THE SADRISTS’ TERRITORIAL REDEPLOYMENT...................................................................10 C. ARE THE SADRISTS SHIFTING ALLIANCES?.............................................................................13 D. A CHANGE IN MODUS OPERANDI........................................................................................16 IV. A SUSTAINABLE CEASEFIRE? .............................................................................. 18 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................
  • Weekly Iraq .Xplored Report 11 January 2020

    Weekly Iraq .Xplored Report 11 January 2020

    Weekly Iraq .Xplored report 11 January 2020 Prepared by Risk Analysis Team, Iraq garda.com Confidential and proprietary © GardaWorld Weekly Iraq .Xplored Report 11 January 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 2 ACTIVITY MAP .................................................................................................................................................... 3 OUTLOOK ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Short term outlook ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Medium to long term outlook ............................................................................................................................ 5 SIGNIFICANT EVENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Iran launches ballistic missiles at Al Assad Airbase and Erbil International Airport ................................. 6 US Embassy targeted by multiple IDF attacks during current US / Iranian tensions ................................. 6 THREAT MATRIX ................................................................................................................................................ 6 OVERVIEW...........................................................................................................................................................
  • Iraq Fact Sheet

    Iraq Fact Sheet

    Iraq Fact Sheet Government The Iraqi government was created by a new constitution in 2005, after the fall of Saddam Hussein. The government is led by a Kurdish President, currently Fuad Masum, a Shia Prime Minister, currently Haider Abadi, and a Sunni Arab Vice President, currently, Khodair Khozaei. The Prime Minister is the dominant leader. The population of Iraq is estimated to be 38 million, with two official languages, Arabic and Kurdish. Ethnic and Religious Groups Sunni Arabs: Iraqi Sunni Arabs number about 20% of the population, or around 5-7 million people. Under Saddam Hussein, who was a Sunni Arab, they had a privileged place in Iraq. During the de- Ba’athification process post-2005, Sunni Arabs were largely excluded by the Shia elites, particularly under former Prime Minister Nouri Maliki. Sunnis, including those from the “Awakening Councils,” were also mostly excluded from joining the Iraqi Army, as it was feared that they could retake control. Shia Arabs: Shia Arabs are roughly 60% of the total population. Under Saddam, the Shiites were largely oppressed, shut off from their Shia neighbor Iran, and generally excluded from power in the country. In post-Saddam Iraq, the constitution gave Shias the most powerful position, that of Prime Minister. Nouri Maliki, the former Prime Minister, favored Shias. Maliki also took advantage of U.S. aid; it is reported that Iraq’s security forces received nearly $100 billion from 2006 to 2014. Maliki became increasingly authoritarian during his eight years as premier, and eventually was pushed out. The current Prime Minister, Haider al-Abadi, is also a Shia Arab from the same party – Dawa – as Maliki, but has been generally less biased, less corrupt, more pro-American, and less pro-Iranian.
  • The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya About MERI The Middle East Research Institute engages in policy issues contributing to the process of state building and democratisation in the Middle East. Through independent analysis and policy debates, our research aims to promote and develop good governance, human rights, rule of law and social and economic prosperity in the region. It was established in 2014 as an independent, not-for-profit organisation based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Middle East Research Institute 1186 Dream City Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq T: +964 (0)662649690 E: [email protected] www.meri-k.org NGO registration number. K843 © Middle East Research Institute, 2017 The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of MERI, the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict MERI Policy Paper Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya October 2017 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................4 2. “Reconciliation” after genocide .........................................................................................................5
  • The Buildup of the German War Economy: the Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 by Samantha Carl I

    The Buildup of the German War Economy: the Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 by Samantha Carl I

    The Buildup of the German War Economy: The Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 By Samantha Carl INTRODUCTION German-Soviet relations in the early half of the twentieth century have been marked by periods of rapprochement followed by increasing tensions. After World War I, where the nations fought on opposite sides, Germany and the Soviet Union focused on their respective domestic problems and tensions began to ease. During the 1920s, Germany and the Soviet Union moved toward normal relations with the signing of the Treaty of Rapallo in 1922.(1) Tensions were once again apparent after 1933, when Adolf Hitler gained power in Germany. Using propaganda and anti-Bolshevik rhetoric, Hitler depicted the Soviet Union as Germany's true enemy.(2) Despite the animosity between the two nations, the benefits of trade enabled them to maintain economic relations throughout the inter-war period. It was this very relationship that paved the way for the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939 and the subsequent outbreak of World War II. Nazi-Soviet relations on the eve of the war were vital to the war movement of each respective nation. In essence, the conclusion of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact on August 23, 1939 allowed Germany to augment its war effort while diminishing the Soviet fear of a German invasion.(3) The betterment of relations was a carefully planned program in which Hitler sought to achieve two important goals. First, he sought to prevent a two-front war from developing upon the invasion of Poland. Second, he sought to gain valuable raw materials that were necessary for the war movement.(4) The only way to meet these goals was to pursue the completion of two pacts with the Soviet Union: an economic agreement as well as a political one.
  • Chapter 20 Section 3

    Chapter 20 Section 3

    CHAPTER 20 SECTION 3 Oil and strategic trading lands have continued to be sources of conflict in the Middle East o United States and Soviets fought for control during the Cold War o Western countries continue to want control today Israel’s creation by the United Nations in 1948 was not recognized by Arabs in Palestine, leading to many conflicts still continuing today o Three wars 1956, 1967, and 1973 . Leads to Israel gaining more land; While between wars, Israelis faced terrorist attacks; United States continually attempts to make peace, unsuccessfully . 1967 war Israeli military takes control of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula in Egypt, and Golan Heights from Syria . 1973/Yom Kippur War Arabs surpassingly attacked on Yom Kippur, but still could not take back occupied lands; Israelis begin housing Jewish people in occupied lands o Palestine Liberation Organization leads Arab fight against Israel . Led by Yasir Arafat; Extreme dislike of Israelis, and wanted to destroy Israel; Attacked Israel numerous times; Airplane hi-jacking and Olympic killings . In 1987, Arabs in Israel-occupied lands attempt to revolt; Using suicide bombers and terroristic attacks, with many Israelis and Arabs dying o United States and United Nations have attempted to bring peace to the region . Golda Meir was in peace talks in 1973 when Arabs attacked; Peace Accord signed in 1979, giving Sinai Peninsula back to Egypt; Jordan makes peace with Israel in 1994; Syria and Israel continue to fight over Golan Heights . Oslo Accords, signed in 1993 by Yasir Arafat and Israeli leader Yitzhak Rabin gave Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank limited self-rule, and recognition by Israel, and Palestinian Liberation Organization stops terrorist Attacks on Israel o Even with pledge by Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian violence on Israelis continued .