DOCSLIB.ORG

UCRB Chapter 5 Lists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UCRB Chapter 5 Lists Contents Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Team ................................................................................. 1 Project Leadership Team....................................................................................................................................... 1 ICBEMP EIS Team .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Science Integration Team ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Other Contributors .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Distribution List ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Literature Cited ......................................................................................................................................................... 53 LIST OF PREPARERS List of Preparers Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Leadership Team Jeff Blackwood B.S., Forest Management, Experience includes positions as Project Manager Oregon State University. District Ranger and Umatilla National Forest Supervisor. Worked 3 years in Walla Walla, Washington Forest Service (26 years). strategic planning in the Regional Office to coordinate production of 19 forest plans. Linda Colville M.S., Public Administration, Experience includes positions as George Mason University; Associate State Director for Colorado, Project Manager B.S., Technology Management, Project Manager for Automated Land Boise, Idaho University of Maryland. and Mineral Record System, Associate (Started June 1996) Service Center Director, Professor of BLM (5 years); Systems Management, Policy Analyst, Department of Defense (18 years). Program Analyst, and Personnel Specialist. James May M.S., Water Resources Management, Experience includes positions as Vale University of Wisconsin; District Manager, Idaho State Liaison Acting Project Manager A.B., Zoology, University of Indiana. Officer, Congressional Liaison Boise, Idaho Specialist, Area Manager, Acting (Started February 1997) BLM (20 years); Army Corps of District Manager for Resources, Engineers (6 years). Outdoor Recreation Planner and Environmental Specialist. Stephen Mealey M.S., Wildlife Management, Experience includes positions as Boise Montana State University; National Forest Supervisor, Assistant Project Manager B.S., Forestry, University of Idaho; Chief for Strategic Planning in the Boise, Idaho B.A., Political Science, Washington Office, Shoshone (left ICBEMP January 1997) University of Oregon. National Forest Supervisor, National Land Management Planning Staff Forest Service (20 years). Wildlife Biologist, and Land Management Planning Specialist. Pat Geehan M.S., Mineral Economics, Experience includes positions as The Colorado School of Mines; Economic Analyst, Policy Analyst, Deputy Project Manager/ B.A., Economics, Mineral Economist, and Deputy BLM Coordinator The Colorado College. State Director for Mineral Walla Walla, Washington Resources for BLM. (left December 1997) BLM (22 years); Getty Oil Company (1 year). UCRBUCRB Draft DRAFT EIS/Chapter EIS/CHAPTER 5/ 5/P PageAGE 1 1 CHAPTER 5 - LISTS Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project EIS Team- Document Preparers and Team Leaders Andy Brunelle M.S., Public Affairs, Experience includes positions in Intergovernmental Coordination University of Oregon; both city and State governmental B.S., Political Science, affairs, as well as a member of the Team Leader; Public Affairs Boise State University. Northwest Power Planning Council. Team Leader (beginning December 1995) Forest Service (3 years); Office of the Governor - Idaho (7 years); State of Idaho (1 year); City of Cottage Grove, Oregon (2 years); Idaho Secretary of State Office (8 years). Mary Carr M.S., Biology, Experience includes positions as Technical Writer-Editor University of New Hampshire; Writer-Editor, Communications B.A., English, Director, Science Writer, and Worcester State College. Technical Editor; published author of two books on ecology in the Forest Service (6 years); northern Rocky Mountains and Private Non-Profit Organizations (12 numerous articles on natural years); Freelance Technical Editor history and resource topics. (4 years). Patricia Carroll B.S., Soil and Water Conservation, Experience includes positions as University of California at Berkeley. Supervisory Hydrologist, Hydrologist and Soil Scientist Hydrologist, as well as positions in Forest Service (17 years); U.S. erosion control, groundwater Geological Survey (3 years). studies, and hydropower projects. Cathy Humphrey B.S., Geological Sciences, Experience includes positions as Deputy EIS Team Leader New Mexico State University. Planning Team Leader, Wild and Scenic River Team Leader, and BLM (16 years). Petroleum Geologist. Michael (Sherm) Karl Ph.D., Rangeland Resources, Experience includes positions as Rangeland Management Oregon State University; Rangeland Scientist and Rangeland M.S., Zoology, Management Ecologist. Ecologist Fort Hays State University; A.B., Biology, Ripon College. Agricultural Research Service (3 years); Forest Service (3 years). Steven Kozel M.S., Zoology and Physiology, Experience includes positions as Fish Ecologist University of Wyoming; Anadromous Fish B.S., Wildlife and Fisheries, Coordinator, Forest Fishery South Dakota State University. Biologist, Zone Fishery Biologist, and Fishery Biologist. Forest Service (10 years). UCRBUCRB Draft DRAFT EIS/CEIS/ChapterHAPTER 5/P 5/AGE Page 2 2 EIS TEAM DOCUMENT PREPARERS Deanna Mendiola Tanana Community College; Experience includes positions as Staff Administrative Team Leader Boise Junior College. assistant and Secretary to Forest Supervisors and Deputy Forest Forest Service (12 years); Supervisors with the Forest Service County government (3 years); and to Deputy Auditor and Deputy Private industry (14 years). Clerk in county government; Administrative Assistant to financial management consultants; Executive Secretary in private industry; and extensive experience in EIS document preparation at the land management plan level. Thomas Miles B.S., Wildlife Management/Range Experience includes positions as Management, Supervisory Range Conservationist, Rangeland Management Humboldt State University. Range Conservationist, and Range Specialist Technician. BLM (19 years) Melanie Miller M.S., Forestry/Forest Fire Science, Experience includes positions as Fire Ecologist University of Montana; Fire Ecologist for the BLM Division B.S., Physical Geography, of Fire and Aviation Office, for the University of Calgary. National Inter-agency Fire Center, and the BLM/Fairbanks (Alaska) BLM (18 years); District; Resource Management Forest Service (2 years) Planner for the Alberta Provincial Parks; and Forestry Technician for the Forest Service Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. Ralph Perkins B.S. Forest Management, Experience includes 35 years in University of Massachusetts. Forest Management, 25 years in Tribal Liaison Incident Command, 16 years Forest Service (36 years). involving outside groups in agency planning, 10 years as a District Ranger working with Indian tribes and other outside groups. Nick Reyna M.S., Forest Planning Administration, Experience includes positions as Economist Oregon State University; Economics Researcher, Policy B.S., Forest Management, Analyst, Forest Economist, Oregon State University. Transportation Planner, Planning Forester, and Timber Forester. Forest Service (19 years). John Sloan M.S., Forest Ecology, Experience includes positions as University of Minnesota; Research Forester, and Forestry/ Forest Ecologist B.A., Biology, Soil Conservation Officer. Wartburg College. Forest Service (13 years); U.S. Peace Corps (2 years). Joan Suther B.A., Biology, Experience includes positions as Humbolt State Univeristy. Resource officer, District Ranger, Wildlife Biologist Supervisory Wildlife Biologist, Forest Service (8 years); Fisheries Technician, and BLM (3 years); Supervisory Quarantine Inspector. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1 year). UCRBUCRB Draft DRAFT EIS/Chapter EIS/CHAPTER 5/ 5/P PageAGE 3 3 CHAPTER 5 - LISTS Jeffrey Walter B.S., Forest Management, Experience includes positions as Forest Ecologist Colorado State University. Project Leader for Watershed Analysis, Resources Management EIS Team Leader Forest Service (20 years). Assistant, GIS Coordinator, (beginning August 1995) Silviculturist, and Forester. Gary Wyke M.S., Wildland Resource Science, Experience includes positions as University of California at Berkeley; Planning Coordinator, Environmental UCRB EIS Team Co-leader B.S., Forestry, University of Coordinator, Branch Chief for (until August 1996) California at Berkeley. Resources and Planning, Range Conservationist, as well as special BLM (24 years). assignments as Technical Coordinator and Team Leader for EIS documents. Former Upper Columbia River EIS Team Members Keith Bennett M.A., Planning, Experience includes positions as Economic Geographer University of Wyoming; Regional Economist, Mineral (left ICBEMP July 1995) B.A., Sociology,
Recommended publications
  • Sample Ballot General

    Sample Ballot General

    SAMPLE BALLOT IDAHO GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2008 - NEZ PERCE COUNTY, IDAHO POLLS OPEN 8:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. VOTERS LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 7 PRECINCT POLLING PLACE Lewiston #20 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building Lewiston #1 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #21 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building MUST BE A U.S. CITIZEN Lewiston #2 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #22 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building Lewiston #3 .................................... Trinity Lutheran Church Lewiston #23 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building Lewiston #4 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #24 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building Lewiston #5 .................... Woodworkers Local Lodge W364 Lewiston #25 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building Lewiston #6 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #26 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building RESIDE IN THE COUNTY FOR Lewiston #7 .................................... Trinity Lutheran Church Culdesac #30 ........................ Culdesac Community Center Lewiston #8 .............................................. Nazarene Church Gifford #31...................................... Gifford Community Hall THIRTY (30) DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION Lewiston #9 .............................................. Nazarene Church Hatwai #32 ..................... Woodworkers Local Lodge W364 Lewiston #10
  • Intraparty in the US Congress.Pages

    Intraparty in the US Congress.Pages

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cd17764 Author Bloch Rubin, Ruth Frances Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making.
  • Bloch Rubin ! ! a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of The

    Bloch Rubin ! ! a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of The

    ! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making. And, in tracing the development of intraparty organization through several well-known examples of party infighting, I will demonstrate that intraparty organizations have played pivotal — yet largely unrecognized — roles in critical legislative battles, including turn-of-the-century economic struggles, midcentury battles over civil rights legislation, and contemporary debates over national health care policy.
  • Congressional Delegation

    Congressional Delegation

    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Boise Depot Tower Photo courtesy of: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 39 Congressional Districts 40 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
  • Conservation in Idaho Oral History Project

    Conservation in Idaho Oral History Project

    Boise State University ScholarWorks History Graduate Projects and Theses Department of History 12-1-2010 Conservation in Idaho Oral History Project: Oral Historiography, Process and Practice Carissa Mai Black Department of History, Boise State University CONSERVATION IN IDAHO ORAL HISTORY PROJECT: ORAL HISTORIOGRAPHY, PROCESS AND PRACTICE by Carissa Mai Black A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Applied Historical Research Boise State University December 2010 © 2010 Carissa Mai Black ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Carissa Mai Black Thesis Title: Conservation in Idaho Oral History Project: Oral Historiography, Process and Practice Date of Final Oral Examination: 10 April 2009 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Carissa Mai Black, and they also evaluated her presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination, and that the thesis was satisfactory for a master’s degree and ready for any final modifications that they explicitly required. Lisa M. Brady, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Barton Barbour, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Sandra Schackel, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Lisa M. Brady, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by John R. Pelton, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College. DEDICATION To my parents, Harry and Mary Black, and my sister Jessica Elaine Black, for their endless love, support and humor during this process.
  • Crapo Backs Heavier Trucks on Interstates in Idaho

    Crapo Backs Heavier Trucks on Interstates in Idaho

    Crapo backs heavier trucks on interstates in Idaho Bill comes even as Idaho grapples with how to pay for much-needed road improvements Idaho Statesman, August 11, 2010 By: Erika Bolstad WASHINGTON - Although a new state study suggests that trucks aren't shouldering their share of highway costs, Idaho's congressional delegation supports a plan that could permit bigger loads on interstate highways. Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, introduced the bill in the Senate last week, saying it will help "get more goods from the farm or factory to consumers in fewer trips and fewer vehicle miles." Crapo's legislation is co-sponsored by senators from Chris Butler both parties, and is likely also to land the backing of Sen. Mike Crapo has proposed legislation that fellow Idaho Republican Sen. Jim Risch. Both of will raise the maximum weight of trucks allowed Idaho's congressmen, Democrat Walt Minnick and on interstate highways. The idea is drawing Republican Mike Simpson, support a similar measure criticism from the AAA of Idaho and support from the trucking industry. Shown are trucks on in the House. I-84 east of Boise near Micron Technology. The bill allows individual states to approve laws allowing truck weights of 97,000 pounds on interstate highways within their borders. The current weight limit on interstates in Idaho and many states is 80,000 pounds (40 tons), although there's a pilot program allowing trucks of up to 129,000 pounds on some roads. Any truck weighing more than 80,000 would have to be equipped with at least six axles.
  • Articles with Major Mentions of Michael S. Barr January 20, 2009 – October 31, 2010

    Articles with Major Mentions of Michael S. Barr January 20, 2009 – October 31, 2010

    Articles with Major Mentions of Michael S. Barr January 20, 2009 – October 31, 2010 Cheyenne Hopkins, White House backs Itself into a Corner Letting CFPB Remain Leaderless, American Banker, August 27, 2010. WASHINGTON — Although President Obama made the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau a hallmark of the financial reform law enacted July 21, his delay in nominating the agency's first director could hamper its ability to get off the ground. With so much riding on the appointment, several observers had expected Obama to make his choice clear within days of the law's enactment. Instead, the absence of a pick has given rise to a grassroots campaign to appoint Elizabeth Warren to the job, which could create a political issue for the administration whether it ultimately chooses her or not. The Treasury Department, in the meantime, is tasked with getting the agency up and running, and observers said it is critical that a director be nominated and confirmed relatively soon. "There's a lot of operational work that can be done without a director being done, but some of the most profoundly difficult things comes down to having a leader," said Raj Date, the chairman and executive director of the Cambridge Winter Center for Financial Institutions Policy. "Leadership matters. If you are trying to have an agency that attracts the best and brightest for the sector, then you have to have a leader." Creating the consumer bureau was the first in a long list of tasks the agency must accomplish in its first year. Among other things, it must merge mortgage disclosure laws and outline a vision of its own authority.
  • STATE GOVERNORS of IDAHO Updated 1991

    STATE GOVERNORS of IDAHO Updated 1991

    IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY REFERENCE SERIES STATE GOVERNORS OF IDAHO Updated 1991 Number 16 1890 George L. Shoup, June 15, 1836 (Kittaning, Pennsylvania)-December 18, 1904 Businessman. Salmon, Idaho. Colorado Constitutional Convention, 1864. Elected to territorial legislature 1874, 1878. Territorial governor 1889-1890. United States Senate 1890-1901. Republican. Pioneer Cemetery, Boise, Idaho. 1890-1893 Norman B. Willey, March 25, 1838 (Guilford, New York)-October 20, 1921 Miner. Warrens, Idaho. Elected to territorial legislature 1872, 1878. Lieutenant governor 1890. Republican. Died near Topeka, Kansas. 1893-1897 William J. McConnell, September 18, 1839 (Commerce, Michigan)-March 30, 1925 Businessman, rancher. Moscow, Idaho. Oregon legislature 1882. Idaho Constitutional Convention. United States Senate 1890-1891. Indian inspector 1897-1901. Inspector, Immigration Service 1909-1925. Republican. Moscow Cemetery, Moscow, Idaho. 1897-1901 Frank Steunenberg, August 8, 1861 (Keokuk, Iowa)-December 30, 1905 Newspaper publisher. Caldwell, Idaho. Idaho Constitutional Convention. Elected to state legislature 1890. Democrat. Canyon Hill Cemetery, Caldwell, Idaho. 1901-1903 Frank W. Hunt, December 16, 1863 (Louisville, Kentucky)-November 25, 1906 Miner. Gibbonsville, Idaho. Elected to Idaho state legislature 1892. Democrat. Masonic Cemetery, Boise, Idaho. 1903-1905 John T. Morrison, December 25, 1860 (Jefferson Co., Pennsylvania-December 20, 1915 Lawyer, educator. Caldwell, Idaho. Republican. Morris Hill Cemetery, Boise, Idaho. 1 16 1905-1909 Frank R. Gooding, September 16, 1859 (Liverton, England)-June 24, 1928 Rancher. Shoshone, Idaho. Elected to Idaho state legislature 1898, 1900, 1902. United States Senate 1921-1928. Republican. Elmwood Cemetery, Gooding. 1909-1911 James H. Brady, June 12, 1862 (Indiana County, Pennsylvania)-January 13, 1918 Land developer. Pocatello, Idaho.
  • Fair and Balanced

    Fair and Balanced

    Fair and balanced June 11th, 2010 (5) comments Marty Trillhaase ... SlideshowThis article has a slideshow. Click to view. Image #2 JEERS ... to Idaho Freedom Foundation Executive Director Wayne Hoffman. He is responsible for the IdahoReporter.com, which is self-described as "a free news service that provides comprehensive, factual, non-opinionated and non-ideological coverage of state government." Well, not quite. This week IdahoReporter.com's Dustin Hurst put out the word that U.S. Congressman Walt Minnick, D- Idaho, was spending a lot of taxpayer money promoting himself to his constituents through the congressional "franking" privilege. In essence, it's direct mail advertising for incumbents. Minnick, a Democrat in a Republican congressional district, spent more than $150,000 during his first year in office. In contrast, U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, spent $18,000. Then IdahoReporter.com dug back 14 years and located a quote from Minnick - when he challenged U.S. Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho - bashing the franking practice. "It is a perfect example of how professional politicians use a system of perks to stay in office and rip off the taxpayer at the same time, ... " Minnick said. IdahoReporter.com says Craig "averaged about $44,500 a year during his first four years in the Senate, while Minnick averaged roughly $30,000 a quarter in his first 15 months in office." Not only is Minnick supposedly a profligate, he's accused of hypocrisy too. Except for one thing: What this "a free news service that provides comprehensive, factual, non-opinionated and non-ideological coverage of state government" failed to mention was that Minnick hasn't come close to spending the wads of cash his Republican predecessor, Bill Sali, burned through by sending out his junk mail to voters.

  • Wolves Re-Relisted As Endangered

    96 / 63 FINAL YEAR WARS AND Play explores problems IN THE WAC Thunderbirds of veterans Boise State looks Thunderstorms return home Entertainment 1 to defend crown possible. Sports 1 Sports 6 BUSINESS BEAUTIFICATION >>> Business owners turn to landscaping , BUSINESS 1 FRIDAY August 6, 2010 TIMES-NEWS 75 CENTS Magicvalley.com Wolves re-relisted as endangered wolves have been relisted in able wolf management plans stayed under Endangered Idaho hunt off; reactions mixed BREAKING NEWS recent years. Reintroduced to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Species Act protection. to the region in the mid- Service, and the wolf was The Idaho Fish and Game By Laura Lundquist Thursday returned wolves in MAGICVALLEY.COM ’90s, they were taken off the delisted in the two states Commission had planned to Times-News writer Idaho and Montana to the You read this story first online. list in early 2008, only to that May, clearing the way consider season dates, limits endangered species list. receive federal protection for the first wolf hunts in fall on number of wolves killed The Idaho Department of U.S. District Judge Donald He wrote that wolf popula- again later that year thanks 2009. But Wyoming’s plan and allowable hunting Fish and Game will have to Molloys ruling hinged on tions cannot be managed to an injunction Molloy was rejected partly because methods for this falls hunt put its planned discussion of the fact that wolves were based upon political bound- granted. it listed wolves as predators, during its Aug. 16 meeting. wolf-hunt quotas on hold taken off the list in those two aries such as state lines.
  • Federal Government

    Federal Government

    Federal Government US Capitol Building Photo courtesy of Architect of the Capitol Congressional Districts 46 IDAHO BLUE BOOK U.S. Congress Article I of the U.S. Constitution states agencies to determine if they are following that, “All legislative Powers herein granted government policy, and may introduce new shall be vested in a Congress of the United legislation based on what they discover. States, which shall consist of a Senate and a Bills accepted by both houses of Con- House of Representatives.” This bicameral gress and by the President become law. legislature (a governing body with two However, the President may veto a bill houses) is the primary lawmaking body in and return it to Congress. Congress then the U.S. government. To solve problems, reviews the reasons for the rejection but Federal Members of Congress introduce legislative may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Con- proposals called bills or resolutions. After stitution allows Congress to override the considering these proposals Members vote President’s veto with a two-thirds majority to adopt or to reject them. Members of vote of both the House and the Senate. Congress also review the work of executive Members of Congress Members of the Senate and of the House elected for a period of six years, while of Representatives are known respectively representatives are elected for a period as senators and representatives. Each of two years. Furthermore, senators and Member of Congress is elected by representatives must meet the following receiving the greatest number of votes minimum requirements: in the general election.
  • Appendix File 1966 Post-Election Study (1966.T)

    Appendix File 1966 Post-Election Study (1966.T)

    app1966.txt Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE 1966 POST-ELECTION STUDY (1966.T) >> 1966 STANDARD PSU CODE CODE PSU CODE PSU 301-302 BALTIMORE CITY 735-736 GENESEE, MICH. 303-304 BALTIMORE SUBURBS 687-688 HANCOCK, OHIO 271-272 BOSTON CITY 365-366 HARRIS, TEXAS 273-274 BOSTON SUBURBS 775-776 HENNEPIN, MINN. 101-102 CHICAGO CITY, 577-578 HICKMAN, TENN. NORTHERN PART 385-386 JEFFERSON, KY. 103-104 CHICAGO SUBURBS 815-816 KING, WASH. 111-112 CHICAGO CITY, 677-678 KNOX, OHIO SOUTHERN PART 855-856 LANE, OREGON 121-122 CLEVELAND CITY 887-888 LOGAN, COLO. 123-124 CLEVELAND SUBURBS 667-668 LOGAN, ILL. 131-132 DETROIT CITY 955-956 LUZERNE, PA. 133-134 DETROIT SUBURBS 937-938 LYCOMING, PA. 001-002 LOS ANGELES CITY 835-836 MARICOPA, ARIZ. 003-004 LOS ANGELES SUBURBS 765-766 MARION, IND. 241-242 N.J., JERSEY CITY AND NEWARK 637-638 MARSHALL, IND. 243-244 NEW JERSEY SUBURBS 965-966 MERCER, N.J. (REMAINDER OF N.J. 705-706 MINNEHAHA, S.D. PART OF CONSOL. AREA) 517-518 MISSISSIPPI, ARK. 201-202 N.Y.,(BRONX + QUEENS) 445-446 MONTGOMERY, ALA. 211-212 N.Y., (BROOKLYN) 755-756 MONTGOMERY, O. 221-222 N.Y., (MANHATTAN) 567-568 MUHLENBERG, KY. 231-232 N.Y., (RICHMOND) 945-946 NEW LONDON, CONN. 233-234 NEW YORK SUBURBS 995-996 ONONDAGA, N.Y. (REMAINDER OF N.Y. PART OF CONSOL. AREA) 465-466 ORANGE, FLA. 281-282 PHILADELPHIA CITY 497-498 PITT, N.C. 283-284 PHILADELPHIA SUBURBS 897-898 PLUMAS, CALIF. 291-292 PITTSBURGH CITY 425-426 PULASKI, ARK.