APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Assessment August 2018 Submitted to: Dennis Crable Crable & Associates 765 W. Altadena Drive Pasadena, CA 91001-4103 Prepared on Behalf of: Chino Development League P.O. Box 8397 La Verne, CA 91750 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Eagle's Nest IV and V Aviation Business Park Project City of Chino, San Bernardino County, California Material Culture Consulting™ © 2018 All Rights Reserved. Material Culture Consulting, Inc. | 2701-B North Towne Avenue, Pomona CA 91767 | www.materialcultureconsulting.com PHASE 1 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT: EAGLES NEST IV & V AVIATION BUSINESS PARK PROJECT CITY OF CHINO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared on Behalf of: Chino Development League P.O. Box 8397 La Verne, CA 91750 Prepared for: Crable & Associates 765 W. Altadena Drive Pasadena, CA 91001-4103 Principal Investigators/Authors: Tria Marie Belcourt, M.A., Registered Professional Archaeologist Jennifer Kelly, M.Sc., Geology, Professional Paleontologist Sonia Sifuentes, M.Sc, Registered Professional Archaeologist Julia Carvajal, B.S, Archaeologist August 2018 MCC Project Number: 20180708 Type of Study: Cultural and paleontological resources assessment Cultural / Paleontological Resources within Area of Potential Impact: None Paleontological Formations: younger Quaternary alluvium, older Quaternary alluvium USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangle: Prado Dam, Section 21 of Township 2 South, Range 7 West Survey Area: Approximately 8.5 acres Date of Fieldwork: July 27, 2018 Key Words: Archaeology, Paleontology, CEQA, Phase I Survey, Negative Cultural Result, younger Quaternary Alluvium, older Quaternary Alluvium, low sensitivity, moderate sensitivity, San Bernardino County, City of Chino MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Chino Development League (Proponent) proposes construction of the Eagles Nest IV and V Aviation Business Park (Project), on an 9-acre parcel of land within the Chino Airport Master Plan areae of development, in the City of Chino, San Bernardino County, California. Material Culture Consulting, Inc. (MCC) was retained by Crable & Associates to conduct a Phase I cultural and paleontological resource investigation of the Project Area. These assessments were conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), along with local regulations and guidelines. This assessment included a cultural resources records search using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), a fossil locality search at the National History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), an examination of geological maps and paleontological literature, a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), outreach efforts with 20 Native American tribal representatives, and a pedestrian survey. The CHRIS records search identified three previously conducted cultural resources within a 0.25-mile radius buffer around the Project Area, two of which intersect the Project Area itself. The CHRIS records search did not identify any previously recorded cultural resources within the Project Area or within a 0.25-mile radius around the Project. The Project Area is comprised of younger Quaternary Alluvium. While these deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils within the uppermost layers, they may be underlain in this area by older Quaternary deposits, which are considered moderate sensitivity for containing fossils. The LACM identified no previously recorded fossil localities within one mile of the Project Area. The SLF search did not identify any previously known cultural resources within the Project Area. MCC sent letters on August 1, 2018 to 20 Native American contacts identified by the NAHC, requesting any information related to cultural resources or heritage sites within or adjacent to the Project Area. MCC received nine responses from this outreach. Andrew Salas, Chairperson for the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation, provided substantial evidence and family oral history, indicating that the Project is located in the Tribe’s ancestral territory. While the information from Mr. Salas did not point to tribal cultural resources specifically within the Project Area, the area is noted as being potentially sensitive for containing tribal and prehistoric cultural resources. On July 27, 2018, Sonia Sifuentes, M.Sc., RPA, MCC Archaeologist and Cross-Trained Paleontologist, conducted the pedestrian survey of the Project Area. No cultural or paleontological resources were identified during the survey, and the Project Area is noted to be highly disturbed from nearly 80 years of use involving significant ground disturbance (orchards and disking for vegetation management). Based on the above findings, the probability of encountering cultural or paleontological resources within the Project Area is considered low. MCC recommends no further mitigation measures are needed for the duration of the Project. While we do not recommend additional mitigation, we do recommend setting a plan in place to expediently address inadvertent cultural and paleontological discoveries and human remains, should these be encountered during construction activities. We also recommend retaining a Native American and Archaeological monitor to respond to inadvertent finds, prior to construction. Finally, if excavations extend greater than ten feet below surface, MCC recommends periodic paleontological spot checks to determine if older, paleontologically sensitive sediments are present. Please note – if the lead agency for this project requires presence of Tribal Cultural Monitors, archaeological monitoring is also required in tandem, to quickly and expeditiously salvage materials in a scientific manner, and assess such finds for archaeological significance. A copy of this report will be permanently filed with the CHRIS South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. All notes, photographs, correspondence and other materials related to this Project are located at the MCC office located in Pomona, California. Material Culture Consulting, Inc. | 2701 B N. Towne Ave Pomona CA 91767 | 626-205-8279 | www.materialcultureconsulting.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 5 PROJECT PERSONNEL 5 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 9 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) 9 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARKS AND POINTS OF HISTORICAL INTEREST 10 PALEONTOLOGY 11 BACKGROUND 14 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 14 PALEONTOLOGICAL SETTING 14 PREHISTORIC CONTEXT 16 ETHNOGRAPHY 17 HISTORICAL SETTING 18 METHODS 23 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY SYSTEM AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND RESEARCH 23 NATIVE AMERICAN OUTREACH AND BACKGROUND RESEARCH 23 PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORDS SEARCH 23 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL FIELD SURVEY AND SITE VISIT 23 RESULTS 25 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY SYSTEM AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND RESEARCH 25 NATIVE AMERICAN OUTREACH AND BACKGROUND RESEARCH 27 PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORDS SEARCH 28 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL FIELD SURVEY RESULTS 28 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 CULTURAL RESOURCES CONCLUSIONS 32 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS 32 Inadvertent Discoveries 32 Human Remains 32 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONCLUSIONS 32 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS 33 REFERENCES 34 Material Culture Consulting, Inc. | 2701 B N. Towne Ave Pomona CA 91767 | 626-205-8279 | www.materialcultureconsulting.com LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. EAGLES NEST V AND VI AVIATION BUSINESS PARK PROJECT LOCATION (1:500,000) ....................................................... 6 FIGURE 2. EAGLES NEST V &VI AVIATION BUSINESS PARK PROJECT AREA (1:24,000, AS DEPICTED ON PRADO DAM USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE) ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 3. EAGLES NEST V & VI AVIATION BUSINESS PARK PROJECT AREA (1:2,000, AS DEPICTED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH) ................ 8 FIGURE 4. GEOLOGICAL MAP OF PROJECT AREA (1:24,000; COMPLIED BY USGS IN OPEN SOURCE PDF FORMAT) ............................. 15 FIGURE 5. MAP OF RANCHO SANTA ANA DEL CHINO (MARTINO ET AL. 2011) ............................................................................. 19 FIGURE 6. THE CHINO VALLEY SUGAR BEET FACTORY (MARTINO ET AL. 2011) ............................................................................ 20 FIGURE 7. DAIRY INDUSTRY, CIRCA 1920S (MARTINO ET AL. 2011) ........................................................................................... 21 FIGURE 5. OPENING CEREMONY AT CAL-AERO ACADEMY IN 1940 (CUPIDO 2000) .................................................................... 22 FIGURE 6. STUDENT PILOT PREPARING FOR FIRST SOLO FLIGHT DURING TRAINING AT CAL-AERO ACADEMY (CUPIDO 2000) ................ 22 FIGURE 7. PRE-DEVELOPED PROJECT AREA (DEPICTED ON 1938 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH) .................................................................. 26 FIGURE 8. PROJECT AREA AFTER INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CAL-AERO/CHINO AIRPORT (DEPICTED ON 1966 AERIAL PHOTO) .............. 26 FIGURE 9. PROJECT AREA (DEPICTED ON 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH) ........................................................................................ 27 FIGURE 10. PROJECT OVERVIEW FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER (VIEW WEST/NORTHWEST) .............................................................. 29 FIGURE 11. PROJECT OVERVIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER (VIEW NORTHEAST) ........................................................................ 30 FIGURE 12. OVERVIEW