DOCSLIB.ORG

Chromite: from the Mineral to the Commodity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chromite: from the Mineral to the Commodity Università degli Studi di Milano Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio” Scuola di Dottorato “Terra, Ambiente e Biodiversità” Dottorato di Ricerca in Scienze della Terra Ciclo XXV – Raggruppamento disciplinare GEO/09 Chromite: from the mineral to the commodity PhD Thesis Maria Pedrotti Matr. N. R08693 Tutore Anno Accademico Coordinatore Prof. Giovanni Grieco 2011-2012 Prof. Elisabetta Erba A chi mi vuole bene, mi stima e crede in me Index Index CHAPTER 1: CHROMITE: HISTORY, GEOLOGY, USES AND REPORT OF CHROMIUM MARKET .... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 Mineralogy .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Chromite ore deposit types .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3.3 Stratiform chromite ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.4 Podiform chromite ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 DISTRIBUTION OF MAJOR CHROMITE DEPOSITS ................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 CHROMITE USES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.1 High-carbon ferrochromium ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.2 Low-carbon ferrochromium ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6.3 Steels .................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.4 Chromium metal ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.6.5 Nonferrous alloys .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.7 CHEMICAL INDUSTRY ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7.1 Pigments .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.7.2 Tannings .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.7.3 Surface treatments ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.7 REFRACTORY INDUSTRY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 FOUNDRY SAND ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.8 REPORT ANALYSES FOR CHROMIUM MARKET ................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2: CHROMITE: ENRICHMENT PROCESSES ........................................................................... 13 2.1 MINERAL PROCESSING CONCEPT ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 MINERAL PROCESSING METHODS ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.3 CHROMITE ORE BENEFICIATION AND PROCESSING ........................................................................................................ 15 2.4 COMMINUTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Crushers ............................................................................................................................................................................ 16 2.4.2 Grinding mills................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 GRAVITY CONCENTRATION .................................................................................................................................................. 17 2.5.1 Jigs ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.5.2 Spirals................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.5.2 Shaking tables ................................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.6 EFFICIENCY OF MINERAL PROCESSING OPERATIONS ...................................................................................................... 21 2.6.1 Liberation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.6.2 Concentration ................................................................................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 3: MADAGASCAR CHROMITE ORE DEPOSITS: STUDY AND SELECTION ....................... 25 3.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 GEOLOGY OF MADAGASCAR ................................................................................................................................................ 26 3.3 LOCAL GEOLOGY, TEXTURE AND MINERAL CHEMISTRY ................................................................................................ 28 3.3.1 Andriamena ...................................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.2 North Befandriana ........................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.3 North Toamasina ............................................................................................................................................................. 30 3.3.4 Antanimbary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Index 3.3.5 North Belobaka ................................................................................................................................................................ 32 3.4 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................................................................. 33 3.5 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4: EVALUATION OF GEOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AFFECTING CHROMITE ENRICHMENT PROCESSES ........................................................................................................................... 41 4.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 41 4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 42 4.3 RESULTS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Efficacy of Artesunate–Amodiaquine in the Treatment of Falciparum
    Raobela et al. Malar J (2018) 17:284 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2440-0 Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access Efcacy of artesunate–amodiaquine in the treatment of falciparum uncomplicated malaria in Madagascar Oméga Raobela1†, Valérie Andriantsoanirina1*†, David Gael Rajaonera1, Tovonahary Angelo Rakotomanga1,2, Stéphane Rabearimanana1,2, Fanomezantsoa Ralinoro1,2, Didier Ménard3 and Arsène Ratsimbasoa1,4 Abstract Background: Since 2006, the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) are recommended to treat uncompli- cated malaria including non Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Madagascar. Artesunate–amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether–lumefantrine are the frst- and second-line treatment in uncomplicated falciparum malaria, respectively. No clinical drug efcacy study has been published since 2009 to assess the efcacy of these two artemisinin-based combinations in Madagascar, although the incidence of malaria cases has increased from 2010 to 2016. In this con- text, new data about the efcacy of the drug combinations currently used to treat malaria are needed. Methods: Therapeutic efcacy studies evaluating the efcacy of ASAQ were conducted in 2012, 2013 and 2016 among falciparum malaria-infected patients aged between 6 months and 56 years, in health centres in 6 sites repre- senting diferent epidemiological patterns. The 2009 World Health Organization protocol for monitoring anti-malarial drug efcacy was followed. Results: A total of 348 enrolled patients met the inclusion criteria including 108 patients in 2012 (n 64 for Matanga, n 44 for Ampasipotsy), 123 patients in 2013 (n 63 for Ankazomborona, n 60 for Anjoma Ramartina)= and 117 patients= in 2016 (n 67 for Tsaratanana, n 50 for= Antanimbary). The overall= cumulative PCR-corrected day 28 cure rate was 99.70% (95%= IC 98.30–99.95).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bemarivo Suture Zone (North Madagascar), a Continental Rift?
    The Bemarivo suture zone (North Madagascar), a continental rift? Master thesis By Paul Janssen 5th of September 2006 University of Utrecht The Bemarivo suture zone (North Madagascar), a continental rift? Paul Janssen 5th of September 2006 Index 1. Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Gondwana ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Geology of Madagascar .................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Antananarivo Block ................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Tsaratanana Sheet .................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Neoproterozoic Sedimentary Belts .......................................................................................... 11 4.5 Antongil Block ........................................................................................................................ 11 4.6 Bemarivo
    [Show full text]
  • MAHAJANGA BV Reçus: 246 Sur 246
    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 4 MAHAJANGA BV reçus: 246 sur 246 INDEPE TIM MANAR AREMA MAPAR HVM NDANT ANARA : FANILO N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E ASSOCI REGION 41 BETSIBOKA BV reçus 39 sur 39 DISTRICT: 4101 KANDREHO BV reçus7 sur 7 01 AMBALIHA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 02 ANDASIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 03 ANTANIMBARIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 04 BEHAZOMATY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 05 BETAIMBOAY 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 06 KANDREHO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 07 MAHATSINJO SUD 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 42 40 0 40 0 11 0 1 1 27 DISTRICT: 4102 MAEVATANANA BV reçus19 sur 19 01 AMBALAJIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 1 02 AMBALANJANAKOMBY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 03 ANDRIBA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 04 ANTANIMBARY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 7 05 ANTSIAFABOSITRA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 5 06 BEANANA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 07 BEMOKOTRA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 1 2 08 BERATSIMANINA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 09 BERIVOTRA 5/5 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 10 MADIROMIRAFY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 4 11 MAEVATANANA I 0 0 10 9 0 9 0 3 0 0 2 4 12 MAEVATANANA II 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 6 13 MAHATSINJO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 MAHAZOMA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 15 MANGABE 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 5 16 MARIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 3 17 MAROKORO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 18 MORAFENO 0 0 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 19 TSARARANO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 2 3 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 134 125 0 125 0 33 0 0 15 77 DISTRICT: 4103 TSARATANANA BV reçus13 sur 13 01 AMBAKIRENY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 4 02 AMPANDRANA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 03 ANDRIAMENA 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 3 04
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Madagascar Country Office Humanitarian Situation
    ary Madagascar u Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 1 Rakotomanga © UNICEF Madagascar/Jan © UNICEF 2020/ UNICEF/UN0267547/Raoelison Reporting Period: 01 January to 31 March 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers Between January 19, 2020 till January 23,2020, there was heavy rains in the northwestern part of Madagascar, more than twice the normal precipitation 1.1 million during the rainy season, resulting in floods in 13 districts. Children in need of humanitarian assistance Emergency response was initially undertaken using prepositioned stocks. Since February 27, the affected districts such as Amparafaravola, Ambatondrazaka, Mampikony, Marovoay. Mitsinjo, Soalalaand Ambato Boeny districts are supplied 2 million by a combination of land, and river transportation. People in need UNICEF Madagascar currently focuses on disaster risk reduction to build resilience, reaching vulnerable people in the drought-prone south suffering from malnutrition and lack of access to safe water in addition to reinforcing 337.200 government systems in preparation for a full-fledged nation-wide response to the Children to be reached COVID_19 Pandemic. From January to March 2020, 3542 children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) were admitted and treated,22 % percent of the 2020 target of 16 000 SAM 441.000 children accessing therapeutic treatment. of peo People to be reached A total of 60,910 people in the south gained access to safe water through water trucking and rehabilitation of boreholes. In preparation for Covid19 response: WASH Needs assessments have been carried out in Health centres and Airports, items have been pre-positioned at 9 entry points, Infection prevention communication through posters is ongoing, and programming for cash transfers to vulnerable households to support basic consumption and compensation for loss of revenues is underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Rights to Human Rights: Mobilising Resources from the Extractive Industries for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
    Mineral rights to human rights: mobilising resources from the Extractive Industries for water, sanitation and hygiene Case Study: Madagascar October 2018 Case Study : Madagascar TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 4 2. SCOPE OF THE WORK .................................................................................. 4 3. KEY CHALLENGES ........................................................................................ 5 3.1. Data availability and quality ..................................................................... 5 3.2. Attribution and impact of Extractive Industry contributions ...................... 5 4. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................. 6 4.1. Countries for study .................................................................................. 6 4.2. Methodology ............................................................................................ 6 5. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION ON THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES .......... 7 5.1. Overview of Madagascar and the Extractive Industries (EI) .................... 7 5.2. Reforms undertaken to increase transparency ...................................... 10 5.3. Institutional and legal framework for the EI ............................................ 11 5.4. Contribution of the EI to the economy ................................................... 19 5.5. Collection and distribution of revenues from the EI ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Epoa) Phone: +261 34 54 463 44; Email: Coordo [email protected]
    Emergency Plan of Action Madagascar: Heavy Rains, Floods and Landslides DREF Operation n° MDRMG016 Glide n°: F-2020-0008-MDG Date of issue: 05/02/2020 Expected timeframe: 4 months Expected end date 30/06/2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 307,356 Total number of people affected: 106,846 Number of people to 5,000 (1,000 HHs) be assisted: Provinces affected: Alaotra Mangoro, Provinces/Regions Alaotra Mangoro, Analamanga, targeted: Analamanga, and Betsiboka, Boeny, Betsiboka, Diana, Melaky, Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 143 Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: French Red Cross (PIROI), German Red Cross, and Luxemburg Red Cross Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: BNGRC (Bureau National de Gestion des Risques de Catastrophes) A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster On 17 January, the Weather Service published a Communique on the risk (low to moderate) of cyclogenesis in the Mozambique Channel, and on 19 January the cyclonic circulation called Zone de Convergence Inter-Tropicale (ZCIT) is fed by the monsoon flow on the North of the Channel to the Northwest of Madagascar. The related storm made landfall on 22nd January on the West coast of Madagascar, in the district of Besalampy, the Melaky region. Red Alert Warning for heavy rains was issued for the following regions on the 22nd January: Boeny, Sofia (Districts of Analalava, Antsohihy, Mampikomy, Boriziny, and Mandritsara), Yellow Alert Warning was issued for the region of Analamanga and Alaotra Mangoro, On 23rd January, Red Alert for High wind for the majority of the coast of the country, from the North, North-Eastern, North-Western, and Western regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Communes Beneficiaires Au Financement Fdl-Papsp 2019
    LISTE DES COMMUNES BENEFICIAIRES AU FINANCEMENT FDL-PAPSP 2019 N° Region District Nom commune Catégorie 1 ALAOTRA MANGORO MORAMANGA AMBOHIDRONONO CR 2 2 ALAOTRA MANGORO MORAMANGA AMPASIPOTSY MANDIALAZA CR 2 3 ALAOTRA MANGORO MORAMANGA ANALASOA ( TANANA AMBONY ) CR 2 4 ALAOTRA MANGORO MORAMANGA BEMBARY CR 2 5 ALAOTRA MANGORO MORAMANGA SABOTSY ANJIRO CR 2 6 AMORON'I MANIA AMBATOFINANDRAHANA AMBATOMIFANONGOA CR 2 7 AMORON'I MANIA AMBATOFINANDRAHANA FENOARIVO CR 2 8 AMORON'I MANIA AMBOSITRA AMBALAMANAKANA CR 2 9 AMORON'I MANIA AMBOSITRA AMBOSITRA CU 10 AMORON'I MANIA AMBOSITRA ANKAZOTSARARAVINA CR 2 11 ANALAMANGA AMBOHIDRATRIMO AMBATO CR 2 12 ANALAMANGA AMBOHIDRATRIMO AMBOHIPIHAONANA CR 2 13 ANALAMANGA AMBOHIDRATRIMO ANJANADORIA CR 2 14 ANALAMANGA AMBOHIDRATRIMO MAHABO CR 2 15 ANALAMANGA AMBOHIDRATRIMO MANJAKAVARADRANO CR 2 16 ANALAMANGA ANJOZOROBE ALAKAMISY CR 2 17 ANALAMANGA ANJOZOROBE AMPARATANJONA CR 2 18 ANALAMANGA ANJOZOROBE ANDRANOMISA AMBANY CR 2 19 ANALAMANGA ANJOZOROBE BERONONO CR 2 20 ANALAMANGA ANJOZOROBE TSARASAOTRA ANDONA CR 2 21 ANALAMANGA ATSIMONDRANO AMBATOFAHAVALO CR 2 22 ANALAMANGA ATSIMONDRANO ANDOHARANOFOTSY CR 2 23 ANALAMANGA ATSIMONDRANO BEMASOANDRO CR 2 24 ANALAMANGA AVARADRANO VILIAHAZO CR 2 25 ANALAMANGA MANJAKANDRIANA AMBATOMANGA CR 2 26 ANALAMANGA MANJAKANDRIANA MIADANANDRIANA CR 2 27 ANALANJIROFO FENERIVE EST AMBATOHARANANA CR 2 28 ANALANJIROFO FENERIVE EST AMBODIMANGA II CR 2 29 ANALANJIROFO FENERIVE EST AMPASINA MANINGORY CR 2 30 ANALANJIROFO FENERIVE EST ANTSIATSIAKA CR 2 31 ANALANJIROFO FENERIVE EST BETAMPONA
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
    EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Toerana Azo Antonina Amin'izany
    FAMPAHAFANTARANA Vaccinodrome manerana ny Nosy Ho antsika mpiara-miasa rehetra eto amin’ny Minisiteran’ny Toekarena sy ny Fitantanam-bola, izay maniry ny hanao na eto amin’ny faritra Analamanga na any amin’ny Faritra, dia omena antsika eto ireo toerana azo antonina amin’izany. Faritra Analamanga ATSINANANA TOAMASINA I CHUM TOAMASINA CSB Urbain AMBOHIDRATRIMO TOAMASINA II BSD TOAMASINA II CSB 2 Ivato Aeroport, CSB 2 Mahitsy, CSB 2 Antehiroka, CSB 2 CSB FANANDRANA Soavinimerina, CSB 2 Talatamaty, CSB 2 Ambohitrimanjaka, CSB FOULPOINTE CSB 2 Ambodirano, CSB 2 Ampangabe, CSB 2 Ambatolampy BRICKAVILLE CSB URBAIN BRICKAVILLE tsimahafotsy, CSB 2 Antanetibe Mahazaza, CSB 2 Anosiala. CHRD2 BRICKAVILLE MAHANORO CHRD MAHANORO ANTANANARIVO ATSIMONDRANO CSB U MAHANORO Hopitaly Itaosy, CSB 2 Andoharanofotsy, CSB 2 Ankadivoribe, CSB1 AMPITAKIHOSY CSB 2 Faliarivo, CSB 2 Itaosy Bemasoandro, CSB 2 Anosizato, VATOMANDRY BSD VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Itaosy Cité, CSB 2 Anjomakely, CSB 2 Tanjombato, CSB URBAIN VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Fenoarivo, CSB 2 Tsararivotra, CSB 2 Soavina, CSB 2 MAROLAMBO CHRD MAROLAMBO Ambohijafy, CSB 2 Ankaraobato, CSB 2 Ambohijanaka, CSB 2 CSB2 MAROLAMBO Ambaniala Itaosy. ANTANAMBAO MANAMPONTSY CHRD ANTANAMBAO MANAMPOTSY ANTANANARIVO AVARADRANO CSB 2 Anosiavaratra, CSB 2 Ankadikely, CSB 2 Ampahimanga, DIANA CSB 2 Masindray, CSB 2 Ambohimangakely, CSB 2 Alasora, ANTSIRANANA 1 CSBU TANAMBAO CSB 2 Sabotsy Namehana, CSB 2 Talata Volonondry, CSB 2 AMBILOBE CSB2 AMBILOBE Anjeva, CSB 2 Ankadinandrina, CSB 2 Ambohimanga Rova, CSB2 AMPONDRALAVA CSB 2 Ambohimalaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Exemplifying Stratified Deforestation in Four Protected Areas In
    Article Exemplifying Stratified Deforestation in Four Protected Areas in Madagascar Serge C. Rafanoharana 1,* , Fatany Ollier D. Andrianambinina 2 , Henintsoa Andry Rasamuel 1 , Mamy A. Rakotoarijaona 2, Jörg U. Ganzhorn 3 , Patrick O. Waeber 4 and Lucienne Wilmé 1,* 1 World Resources Institute Africa, 29 Lalana Printsy Ratsimamanga, BP 3884, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar; [email protected] 2 Madagascar National Parks, Ambatobe, BP 1424, Antananarivo 103, Madagascar; [email protected] (F.O.D.A.); [email protected] (M.A.R.) 3 Tierökologie und Naturschutz Institut Für Zoologie, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; [email protected] 4 Forest Management and Development, Department of Environmental Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, ETH Zentrum, CHN F 75.3, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.C.R.); [email protected] (L.W.); Tel.: +261-328422116 (L.W.) Abstract: Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone for conservation biodiversity. Madagascar, as a hotspot for biodiversity, has a network of 114 terrestrial protected areas covering the main forest types occurring on the island. Deforestation continues unabated despite the network covering 11% of the island. Here we present a case study approach reporting on four PAs from the humid forests, dry western forests, and southwestern dry and spiny forests and thickets. To describe deforestation Citation: Rafanoharana, S.C.; in and around the case sites, we have considered a time window of 30 years for analysis, focusing Andrianambinina, F.O.D.; Rasamuel, on six years with reliable data: 1990, 2000, 2010, 2015 (the year of latest PA network update), and H.A.; Rakotoarijaona, M.A.; 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • MADAGASCAR (! ANALANJIROFO Anove Manompana! !
    M A D A G A S C A R - N o r t h e r n A r e a fh General Logistics Planning Map International Primary Road \! National Capital International (!o Airport Boundary Secondary Road !! Major Town Domestic Airport Region Boundary o Antsisikala ! o Tertiary Road ! Intermediate Airstrip Town District Boundary Track/Trail h h ! ! ! Port Small Town Water Body Antsahampano ! ! ( River crossing Antsiranana ( ! ANTSIRANANA I ĥ Main bridge (ferry) Village River o Date Created: 07 March 2017 Prepared by: OSEP GIS Data Sources: UNGIWG, GeoNames, GAUL, LC, © OpenStreetMap Contributors Contact: [email protected] Map Reference: The boundaries and names and the designations used on this map do not ANTSIRANANA II Website: www.logcluster.org MDG_GLPM_North_A2P imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Anivorano Avaratra! ! Ambovonaomby ĥ Antsohimbondrona ! !h ! Antanambao ! Isesy Ampanakana ! o Ambilobe ! ! ĥ NOSY-BE Sangaloka Fasenina-Ampasy ĥ ! Beramanja ! Iharana o o (! ! ĥ !h !h! Hell-Ville Ampampamena o! ! VOHEMAR ĥ! Ambaliha AMBILOBE Fanambana ! Madirofolo ! Ambanja DIANA AMBANJA ! Masomamangy o Amboahangibe ! ! Bemanevika ! Ankasetra ĥ SAMBAVA ! Nosivolo h Sambava SAVA !o! o ! Doany ! Farahalana ! Marojala ( ( ĥ ! o Bealanana Analalava ! ! Ambatosia ! BEALANANA o Andapa ANDAPA ! Antsohihy ĥ ! Antsahanoro ! Manandriana ĥAntalaha !h ! o ! Andilambe !h Antsirabato ! Anjajavy o Matsoandakana ! ! Antsakabary ! ! o Anahidrano ! ! Marofinaritra Ambararata ANTSOHIHY BEFANDRIANA o NORD (Ambohitralanana ! ANALALAVA ! Befandriana ANTALAHA
    [Show full text]
  • EA16 Rasamimanana Newapp
    Ministère de l’Energie et des Hydrocarbures NOUVELLE APPROCHE POUR ACCELERER L’ELECTRIFICATION RURALE -CAS DE MADAGASCAR - HAMBURG, 25 AVRIL 2015 NOUVELLE APPROCHE POUR ACCELERER L’ELECTRIFICATION RURALE Population 2015: 23 800 000 habitants Superficie : 587 000 km² Population urbaine : 34% Taux de croissance : 2,8% Consommation moyenne d’électricité : 44kWh/hab ETAT DES LIEUX DU SOUS SECTEUR ELECTRIFICATION RURALE Avant 2001 2002 2004 2005 2010 2012 2014 1999 MONOPOLE LIBERALISATION RÉGIME MEM MINISTERE ENERGIE MINISTERE ENERGIE – ADER – ORE MISE EN PLACE DE ADER et ORE: OPERATIONNELS L’ADER et L’ORE AUTORITES JIRAMA JIRAMA JIRAFI 3 OPERATEURS PRIVES 28 EXPLOITANTS (OPERATEURS PRIVES+ ASSOCIATIONS OPERATEURS <1% APRES 15 ANS 5,21% TAUX TAUX D’ACCÈS D’ACCÈS Schéma Directeur Plans Directeurs pour l’ER Régionaux 3 PLANIFICATION L’APPROCHE STRATEGIQUE POUR L’ÉLECTRIFICATION RURALE AVANT 2014 JIRAMA MAEVATANANA I Thermique 945kW (14 200 hab) 18cent/kWh 30km 3 opérateurs différents sur 100km CASIELEC ANTANIMBARY Thermique 34,4kW (3500 hab) 72% : Thermique 42cent/kWh 28% : EnR 70km Services électriques offerts aux clients: très variés ANDRIBA SERMAD (1800 hab ) 20km Hydroélectricité 80kW MAHATSINJO 22 cent/kWh (2500 hab) Pérennité non garantie Electrification d’un village par un opérateur sous le régime d’Autorisation après un appel à candidatures ou candidatures spontanées, suite à une demande ponctuelle 4 LES CONSTATS Financement insuffisant Taille des projets par rapport au besoin limitée (village) réel du Programme Technologie Implication
    [Show full text]