DOCSLIB.ORG

Reserved Sins According to the Cceo and Latae Sententiae Censures According to the Cic in Relation to the Sacrament of Penance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reserved Sins According to the Cceo and Latae Sententiae Censures According to the Cic in Relation to the Sacrament of Penance RESERVED SINS ACCORDING TO THE CCEO AND LATAE SENTENTIAE CENSURES ACCORDING TO THE CIC IN RELATION TO THE SACRAMENT OF PENANCE A COMPARATIVE JURIDICAL AND PASTORAL ANALYSIS Vinson JOSEPH A Dissertation Submitted to the Chair of Canon Law in the Faculty of Theology at the University of Fribourg for Obtaining the Degree of Doctorate under the Direction of Professor Astrid KAPTIJN 2015 RESERVED SINS ACCORDING TO THE CCEO AND LATAE SENTENTIAE CENSURES ACCORDING TO THE CIC IN RELATION TO THE SACRAMENT OF PENANCE A COMPARATIVE JURIDICAL AND PASTORAL ANALYSIS Vinson JOSEPH Director Prof. Astrid KAPTIJN A Dissertation Submitted to the Chair of Canon Law in the Faculty of Theology at the University of Fribourg for Obtaining the Degree of Doctorate Fribourg/Freiburg – 1700 SWITZERLAND 2015 CONTENTS Contents .................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. xi Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... xiii General Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 Chapter I A THEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL APPRAISAL OF THE POWER TO ABSOLVE SINS AND THE REGULATION OF THIS POWER IN THE CHURCH Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7 Part I - The Power of the Church to Absolve Sins 1.1.1. Biblical Foundation .......................................................................................... 8 1.1.1.1. Jesus as Founder of the Sacrament of Reconciliation ............................ 8 1.1.1.2. Jesus Himself is Sent by God the Father ............................................... 10 1.1.1.3. Transmission of this Power of Forgiveness to the Apostles .................. 10 1.1.1.4. The Apostolic Period ............................................................................. 13 1.1.2. The Theology of the Power of the Keys .......................................................... 14 1.1.2.1. Early Fathers of the Church on the Theology of the Power of the Keys 15 1.1.2.1.1. Tertullian: The Power of the Keys Belongs to Peter Alone ........ 16 1.1.2.1.2. Cyprian of Carthage ..................................................................... 18 1.1.2.1.3. Origen .......................................................................................... 19 1.1.2.1.4. Augustine of Hippo ...................................................................... 20 1.1.2.1.5. John Chrysostom ......................................................................... 21 1.1.2.1.6. Ambrose of Milan ........................................................................ 22 1.1.2.1.7. Leo the Great ............................................................................... 23 1.1.2.1.8. Gregory the Great ........................................................................ 24 1.1.2.2. Early Councils on the Power of the Keys .............................................. 25 1.1.2.2.1. First Council of Carthage ............................................................. 25 1.1.2.2.2. The Council of Ancyra ................................................................ 26 RESERVED SINS AND LATAE SENTENTIAE CENSURES ii 1.1.2.2.3. The Great Council of Nicaea ...................................................... 26 1.1.2.2.4. Council of Laodicea .................................................................... 27 1.1.2.2.5. The Third Council of Toledo ...................................................... 28 1.1.2.3. Early Documents on the Power of Keys ............................................... 29 1.1.2.3.1. Apostolic Decree ......................................................................... 29 1.1.2.3.2. The Shepherd of Hermas ............................................................. 30 1.1.2.3.3. Didaskalia Apostolorum ............................................................. 31 1.1.2.3.4. Three Church Orders ................................................................... 32 1.1.2.4. Lateran Council IV ................................................................................ 34 1.1.2.5. Scholastic Theologians on Power of Keys ............................................ 35 1.1.2.5.1. Peter Abelard ............................................................................... 35 1.1.2.5.2. Peter Lombard ............................................................................. 36 1.1.2.5.3. Hugh of St. Victor ....................................................................... 37 1.1.2.5.4. Richard of St. Victor ................................................................... 37 1.1.2.5.5. Thomas Aquinas ......................................................................... 38 1.1.2.5.6. Duns Scotus ................................................................................. 39 1.1.2.6. Council of Trent .................................................................................... 40 1.1.2.7. Vatican Council II ................................................................................. 42 Part II - Development of the Faculty to Forgive Sins in the History of Penance 1.2.1. Bishops as Ordinary Ministers in the Early Centuries .................................... 44 1.2.2. Extra-Ordinary Ministers in the Ancient System ............................................ 46 1.2.3. The Priest Penitentiary in the Eastern Church ................................................ 47 1.2.4. Twenty Five Priests of Titles .......................................................................... 48 1.2.5. Spiritual Men as Minister of the Sacrament According to Origen .................. 49 1.2.6. The System of Private Penance led the Priest to be the Ordinary Minister .... 49 1.2.7. Episcopal Consultation Replaced by Penitentials ........................................... 51 1.2.8. The Conflict in the Case of Faculty in the Early Middle Ages ....................... 52 1.2.9. Lateran Council IV Grants Ordinary Faculty to the Parish Priests ................. 55 1.2.10. Cum ad aures of Innocent XI ........................................................................ 55 1.2.11. Council of Trent Confirms the Ordinary Faculty of Priests .......................... 55 1.2.12. Current Legislation on the Faculty ................................................................ 56 1.2.13. Why are two Powers needed? ....................................................................... 58 RESERVED SINS AND LATAE SENTENTIAE CENSURES iii Part III - Restrictions on the Power to Absolve Sins in the History of Penance 1.3.1. Restrictions in the Early Church ...................................................................... 59 1.3.1.1. Sins Reserved to God: Idolatry, Adultery and Murder .......................... 59 1.3.1.2. Remissible and Irremissible Sins According to Tertullian .................... 60 1.3.1.3. Incurable Sins According to Origen ...................................................... 61 1.3.1.4. Relaxation in the Cases of Irremissible Sins.......................................... 62 1.3.1.5. Capital Crimes and Council of Illiberris ................................................ 63 1.3.2. Restriction Based on the Number of Times: Once per lifetime ....................... 64 1.3.3. Restriction by the Time of Reconciliation: Capital Sins after a Longer Period of Penance or at the Approach of Death ............................................... 64 1.3.4. John Chrysostom on Liberty of the Penitent .................................................... 66 1.3.5. Restriction Based on the Gravity of Sins: Public Penance for Capital Sins .... 67 1.3.6. Restrictions Based on the Public or Private Nature of Capital Sin .................. 68 1.3.7. The First Reservation of Sin in History ........................................................... 69 1.3.8. Wide Reservations of Sins in the Middle Age ................................................. 70 1.3.9. Reservation of Sins According to Council of Trent ......................................... 72 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 73 Chapter II RESERVED SINS ACCORDING TO THE CCEO (cc.727-729) Introduction ................................................................................................................ 75 2.1. The Minister of the Sacrament of Penance in CCEO (c.722) ............................. 76 2.1.1. Two Roles of the Minister of Penance ...................................................... 77 2.1.2. The Priest as the Minister of the Church .................................................. 78 2.1.3. The Absolution by a Priest ........................................................................ 78 2.2. Power of Order and Power of Jurisdiction .......................................................... 79 2.3. The Power of Jurisdiction in the Sacrament of Penance ..................................... 81 2.3.1. The Council of Trent on the Jurisdiction of Penance ............................... 82 2.3.2. Terminological Difference in the new Legislation: Faculty ..................... 82 2.3.3. The Lack of Faculty affects the Validity of the Sacrament ...................... 84 2.4. The Means to Obtain the Faculty to Absolve Sins (cc.722-725)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Pastoral Activity? 1983 Code of Canon Law Can. 528 §1. a Pastor Is Obliged to Make Provision So That the Word of God I
    What is Pastoral Activity? 1983 Code of Canon Law Can. 528 §1. A pastor is obliged to make provision so that the word of God is proclaimed in its entirety to those living in the parish; for this reason, he is to take care that the lay members of the Christian faithful are instructed in the truths of the faith, especially by giving a homily on Sundays and holy days of obligation and by offering catechetical instruction. He is to foster works through which the spirit of the gospel is promoted, even in what pertains to social justice. He is to have particular care for the Catholic education of children and youth. He is to make every effort, even with the collaboration of the Christian faithful, so that the message of the gospel comes also to those who have ceased the practice of their religion or do not profess the true faith. §2. The pastor is to see to it that the Most Holy Eucharist is the center of the parish assembly of the faithful. He is to work so that the Christian faithful are nourished through the devout celebration of the sacraments and, in a special way, that they frequently approach the sacraments of the Most Holy Eucharist and penance. He is also to endeavor that they are led to practice prayer even as families and take part consciously and actively in the sacred liturgy which, under the authority of the diocesan bishop, the pastor must direct in his own parish and is bound to watch over so that no abuses creep in.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantia, St
    THE AGES DIGITAL LIBRARY REFERENCE CYCLOPEDIA of BIBLICAL, THEOLOGICAL and ECCLESIASTICAL LITERATURE Constantia, St. - Czechowitzky, Martin by James Strong & John McClintock To the Students of the Words, Works and Ways of God: Welcome to the AGES Digital Library. We trust your experience with this and other volumes in the Library fulfills our motto and vision which is our commitment to you: MAKING THE WORDS OF THE WISE AVAILABLE TO ALL — INEXPENSIVELY. AGES Software Rio, WI USA Version 1.0 © 2000 2 Constantia, Saint a martyr at Nuceria, under Nero, is commemorated September 19 in Usuard's Martyrology. Constantianus, Saint abbot and recluse, was born in Auvergne in the beginning of the 6th century, and died A.D. 570. He is commemorated December 1 (Le Cointe, Ann. Eccl. Fran. 1:398, 863). Constantin, Boniface a French theologian, belonging to the Jesuit order, was born at Magni (near Geneva) in 1590, was professor of rhetoric and philosophy at Lyons, and died at Vienne, Dauphine, November 8, 1651. He wrote, Vie de Cl. de Granger Eveque et Prince dae Geneve (Lyons, 1640): — Historiae Sanctorum Angelorum Epitome (ibid. 1652), a singular work upon the history of angels. He also-wrote some other works on theology. See Hoefer, Nouv. Biog. Generale, s.v.; Jocher, Allgemeines Gelehrten- Lexikon, s.v. Constantine (or Constantius), Saint is represented as a bishop, whose deposition occurred at Gap, in France. He is commemorated April 12 (Gallia Christiana 1:454). SEE CONSTANTINIUS. Constantine Of Constantinople deacon and chartophylax of the metropolitan Church of Constantinople, lived before the 8th century. There is a MS.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of The
    The History of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America The American Orthodox Catholic Church Old Catholic Orthodox Church Archbishop Gregory Morra, OSB Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Episcopal Imprimatur of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Old Catholic Orthodox Church This history of the church is hereby released under the authority of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide which is a direct blood descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church chartered in 1927 by Metropolitan Platon and later led by Archbishop Aftimios Ofiesh of Brooklyn, New York and eventually recognized as The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America. In its current form the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide and the Old Catholic Orthodox Church subsidiary recognizes the contributions of the early fathers of this historic church in the person of Metropolitan-Patriarch Denis M. Garrison (Emeritus) through the lineage of Archbishop Aftimios of blessed memory as the true spiritual father of the Church. Therefore, the Holy Synod hereby confers its official imprimatur on the history of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide as a direct historical descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church as outlined in this document. Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Vatican City
    Information Guide Vatican City A guide to information sources on the Vatican City State and the Holy See. Contents Information sources in the ESO database .......................................................... 2 General information ........................................................................................ 2 Culture and language information..................................................................... 2 Defence and security information ..................................................................... 2 Economic information ..................................................................................... 3 Education information ..................................................................................... 3 Employment information ................................................................................. 3 European policies and relations with the European Union .................................... 3 Geographic information and maps .................................................................... 3 Health information ......................................................................................... 3 Human rights information ................................................................................ 4 Intellectual property information ...................................................................... 4 Justice and home affairs information................................................................. 4 Media information .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
    Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Book IV – Function of the Church: Part I – the Sacraments
    The Sacraments The Catholic Church recognizes the existence of Seven Sacraments instituted by the Lord. They are: Sacraments of Christian Initiation: Baptism, Confirmation, and the Eucharist Sacraments of Healing: Penance (Reconciliation) and Anointing of the Sick Sacraments at the Service of Communion: Holy Orders and Matrimony Code of Cannon Law: Book IV - Function of the Church: Part I - The Sacraments The Sacraments (Code of Canon Law; Cann. 840-848) Can. 840 The sacraments of the New Testament were instituted by Christ the Lord and entrusted to the Church. As actions of Christ and the Church, they are signs and means which express and strengthen the faith, render worship to God, and effect the sanctification of humanity and thus contribute in the greatest way to establish, strengthen, and manifest ecclesiastical communion. Accordingly, in the celebration of the sacraments the sacred ministers and the other members of the Christian faithful must use the greatest veneration and necessary diligence. Can. 841 Since the sacraments are the same for the whole Church and belong to the divine deposit, it is only for the supreme authority of the Church to approve or define the requirements for their validity; it is for the same or another competent authority according to the norm of can. 838 §§3 and 4 (Can. 838 §3. It pertains to the conferences of bishops to prepare and publish, after the prior review of the Holy See, translations of liturgical books in vernacular languages, adapted appropriately within the limits defined in the liturgical books themselves. §4. Within the limits of his competence, it pertains to the diocesan bishop in the Church entrusted to him to issue liturgical norms which bind everyone.) to decide what pertains to their licit celebration, administration, and reception and to the order to be observed in their celebration.
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Papal Law
    Journal of the British Academy, 5, 37–59. DOI https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/005.037 Posted 00 March 2017. © The British Academy 2017 Stages of papal law Raleigh Lecture on History read 1 November 2016 DAVID L. D’AVRAY Fellow of the British Academy Abstract: Papal law is known from the late 4th century (Siricius). There was demand for decretals and they were collected in private collections from the 5th century on. Charlemagne’s Admonitio generalis made papal legislation even better known and the Pseudo-Isidorian collections brought genuine decretals also to the wide audience that these partly forged collections reached. The papal reforms from the 11th century on gave rise to a new burst of papal decretals, and collections of them, culminating in the Liber Extra of 1234. The Council of Trent opened a new phase. The ‘Congregation of the Council’, set up to apply Trent’s non-dogmatic decrees, became a new source of papal law. Finally, in 1917, nearly a millennium and a half of papal law was codified by Cardinal Gasparri within two covers. Papal law was to a great extent ‘demand- driven’, which requires explanation. The theory proposed here is that Catholic Christianity was composed of a multitude of subsystems, not planned centrally and each with an evolving life of its own. Subsystems frequently interfered with the life of other subsystems, creating new entanglements. This constantly renewed complexity had the function (though not the purpose) of creating and recreating demand for papal law to sort out the entanglements between subsystems. For various reasons other religious systems have not generated the same demand: because the state plays a ‘papal’ role, or because the units are small, discrete and simple, or thanks to a clear simple blueprint, or because of conservatism combined with a tolerance of some inconsistency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capital Sculpture of Wells Cathedral: Masons, Patrons and The
    The Capital Sculpture of Wells Cathedral: Masons, Patrons and the Margins of English Gothic Architecture MATTHEW M. REEVE For Eric Fernie This paper considers the sculpted capitals in Wells cathedral. Although integral to the early Gothic fabric, they have hitherto eluded close examination as either a component of the building or as an important cycle of ecclesiastical imagery in their own right. Consideration of the archaeological evidence suggests that the capitals were introduced mid-way through the building campaigns and were likely the products of the cathedral’s masons rather than part of an original scheme for the cathedral as a whole. Possible sources for the images are considered. The distribution of the capitals in lay and clerical spaces of the cathedral leads to discussion of how the imagery might have been meaningful to diCerent audiences on either side of the choir screen. introduction THE capital sculpture of Wells Cathedral has the dubious honour of being one of the most frequently published but least studied image cycles in English medieval art. The capitals of the nave, transepts, and north porch of the early Gothic church are ornamented with a rich array of figural sculptures ranging from hybrid human-animals, dragons, and Old Testament prophets, to representations of the trades that inhabit stiC-leaf foliage, which were originally highlighted with paint (Figs 1, 2).1 The capitals sit upon a highly sophisticated pier design formed by a central cruciform support with triple shafts at each termination and in the angles, which oCered the possibility for a range of continuous and individual sculpted designs in the capitals above (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison Between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law
    The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law Word count: 36,697 Raphael Maesschalck Student number: 01204319 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Jan Verplaetse Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Tom Vander Beken A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Academic year: 2017 - 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH Een woord van dank gaat uit naar: - Mijn promotor, Prof. dr. Jan Verplaetse, wiens ideeën mij lieten durven denken, voor het interessante onderwerp; - Dr. William Richardson, voor het aanreiken van een literatuurlijst, het beantwoorden van mijn (vele) chaotische vragen en het ter beschikking stellen van verhelderende inzichten tijdens onze gesprekken; - Prof. em. dr. Ruud Huysmans, voor het delen zijn expertise en visie en de tijd die hij daarvoor vrijmaakte; - Mr. Eric De Wilde, voor het mij wegwijs maken in het doolhof van de bijzondere faculteit kerkelijk recht te Leuven en het gebruikelijke kopje koffie; - Mr. Philippe Tobback, niet alleen voor het ter beschikking stellen van een geairconditioneerde werkplaats in de moordende zomerhitte, maar vooral voor alle steun en hulp die mij steeds opnieuw werd aangeboden; - Dr. Nigel Coles, mr. Martin Jones en mr. Nils Van Damme, voor het nalezen dit werk; - Mijn vader, voor de economische en morele steun; - En tenslotte mijn moeder, voor veel meer dan dat wat een louter dankwoord verdient. !2 !3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH____________________________________ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS______________________________________________ 4 GENERAL INTRODUCTION___________________________________________ 7 CHAPTER I: Introduction to the Legal and Institutional Frameworks____________ 9 1 The Church and Ecclesiastical Criminal Law.................................................................. 9 1.1 The Church as a Spiritual and Governing Institution..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118
    Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118 It is the policy of the Board of Education that all Board members conduct themselves in a professional manner and in accordance with the Code of Ethics adopted by the Board. A "censure" under this policy is the process by which the Board of Education, acting by a two-thirds majority vote (i.e. five affirmative votes), can reprimand or condemn the actions of a member for any violation of law or policy or any other conduct committed by a Board member which tends to injure the good name of the Buncombe County Board of Education and/or undermines the effectiveness of the Buncombe County Schools or the Board of Education. A censure is an expression of formal disapproval by the Board. The Board, in addition to or in lieu of censure, may vote to 1) ask the member to resign or 2) refer possible misconduct by a Board member to the District Attorney as provided by law and/or 3) issue the Board member an official warning regarding future conduct. The Board of Education does not have the legal authority to remove a Board member from office. Therefore, any legal consequences or punitive sanctions related to a Board member’s actions shall be in accordance with applicable law and shall be separate and distinct from any censure proceeding under this Policy. In the event that a member of the Board of Education believes that a fellow Board member should be formally censured by the Board, the following protocol shall apply: 1) All Board proceedings related to a censure motion, with the exception of the disclosure of confidential information as permitted by the Open Meetings Law, shall be conducted in an open meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Orthodox Question in the USSR
    The Ukrainian Orthodox Question in the USSR FRANK E. SYSYN In 1977 Father Vasyl' Romanyuk, a prisoner in the Soviet Gulag because of his struggle for religious and national rights, addressed a letter to Metropolitan Mstyslav, leader of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church in the West:. Your Grace! First of all, I assure you of my devotion and humility. I declare that I consider and have always considered myself a member of the U[krainian] A[utocephalous] O[rthodox] C[hurch] in spite of the fact that I formally belonged to a different hierarchy, for it is well known that the Ukrainian Church, Orthodox as well as Catholic, is outlawed in Ukraine. Such are the barbaric ethics of the Bolsheviks. 1 The appeal was a remarkable testimony that almost fifty years after the destruction of the Ukrainian Orthodox Autocephalous Church formed in the 1920s and over thirty years after the eradication of the Church restored during the Second World War, loyalty to Ukrainian Orthodoxy still remains alive among Ukraine's believers. It also demonstrates how shared persecution has brought new ecumenical understanding between U,laainian Orthodox and Ukrainian Catholics. 'To discuss the position of Ukrainian Orthodoxy in the Soviet Union is a difficult task, for since the destruction of tens of its bishops, thousands of its priests, and tens of thousands of its lay activists in the early 1930s (and once again after the Second World War), and its forcible incorporation into the Russian Orthodox Church, it exists more as a loyalty and an Ull­ realised dream than as an active movement.
    [Show full text]