Reisebericht New York Juni 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Star Chef Preps Recipe to Address Jobs Crisis How Not to Save a B'klyn
INSIDE MLB’s FAN CAVE Social-media mavens score one for the game CRAIN’S® NEW YORK BUSINESS P. 25 VOL. XXX, NO. 18 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM MAY 5-11, 2014 PRICE: $3.00 NY’s new arts nexus Move over, Brooklyn: Queens is rising fast on city culture scene BY THERESA AGOVINO The Queens Theatre’s walls are lined with photos of the 1964-65 World’s Fair, a nod to the building’s genesis as part of the New York State Pavilion. Plays inspired by the World’s Fairs of 1939 and 1964— each held in Flushing Meadows Corona Park—are on tap for this summer. The theater’s managing director,Taryn Sacra- mone, is hoping nostalgia and curiosity about the fairs draw more people to the institution as she tries to raise its profile. STAGING A REVIVAL: Managing Director Taryn Momentum is on her side because Sacramone is seeking Queens is on a cultural roll. Ms. Sacramone’s new programming for See QUEENS on Page 23 the Queens Theatre. buck ennis How not to save a B’klyn hospital Star chef preps recipe Unions, activists, de Blasio fought to stop But the two opponents were in to address jobs crisis court on Friday only because com- LICH’s closure. Careful what you wish for munity groups, unions and politi- cians with little understanding of Each week, the French chef has Hospital in Cobble Hill, faced off New York’s complex health care in- So many restaurants, between 10 to 30 job openings in his BY BARBARA BENSON in a Brooklyn courtroom late last dustry have, for the past year, inject- too few workers; seven restaurants and catering busi- Friday. -
Leseprobe 9783791384900.Pdf
NYC Walks — Guide to New Architecture JOHN HILL PHOTOGRAPHY BY PAVEL BENDOV Prestel Munich — London — New York BRONX 7 Columbia University and Barnard College 6 Columbus Circle QUEENS to Lincoln Center 5 57th Street, 10 River to River East River MANHATTAN by Ferry 3 High Line and Its Environs 4 Bowery Changing 2 West Side Living 8 Brooklyn 9 1 Bridge Park Car-free G Train Tour Lower Manhattan of Brooklyn BROOKLYN Contents 16 Introduction 21 1. Car-free Lower Manhattan 49 2. West Side Living 69 3. High Line and Its Environs 91 4. Bowery Changing 109 5. 57th Street, River to River QUEENS 125 6. Columbus Circle to Lincoln Center 143 7. Columbia University and Barnard College 161 8. Brooklyn Bridge Park 177 9. G Train Tour of Brooklyn 195 10. East River by Ferry 211 20 More Places to See 217 Acknowledgments BROOKLYN 2 West Side Living 2.75 MILES / 4.4 KM This tour starts at the southwest corner of Leonard and Church Streets in Tribeca and ends in the West Village overlooking a remnant of the elevated railway that was transformed into the High Line. Early last century, industrial piers stretched up the Hudson River from the Battery to the Upper West Side. Most respectable New Yorkers shied away from the working waterfront and therefore lived toward the middle of the island. But in today’s postindustrial Manhattan, the West Side is a highly desirable—and expensive— place, home to residential developments catering to the well-to-do who want to live close to the waterfront and its now recreational piers. -
Entscheidungsgründe
Postadresse: Erdbergstraße 192 – 196 1030 Wien Tel: +43 1 601 49 – 0 Fax: +43 1 711 23-889 15 41 E-Mail: [email protected] www.bvwg.gv.at Entscheidungsdatum 18.02.2021 Geschäftszahl G312 2191725-1/11E IM NAMEN DER REPUBLI K! Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht hat durch die Richterin Mag. Manuela WILD als Einzelrichterin über die Beschwerde XXXX alias XXXX, geb. XXXX, StA. Irak, vertreten durch die BBU GmbH, gegen den Bescheid des Bundesamtes für Fremdenwesen und Asyl – Regionaldirektion XXXX – vom XXXX, Zl. XXXX, nach Durchführung einer mündlichen Verhandlung am 28.12.2020, zu Recht erkannt: A) I. Die Beschwerde wird hinsichtlich Spruchpunkte I. und II. des angefochtenen Bescheides als unbegründet abgewiesen. II. Der Beschwerde wird hinsichtlich Spruchpunkt III. und IV. stattgegeben und eine Rückkehrentscheidung auf Dauer für unzulässig erklärt. XXXX alias XXXX, geb. XXXX wird der Aufenthaltstitel "Aufenthaltsberechtigung plus" für die Dauer von 12 Monaten erteilt. III. Die Spruchpunkte V. - VI. werden ersatzlos aufgehoben. B) Die Revision ist gemäß Art. 133 Abs. 4 B-VG nicht zulässig. Entscheidungsgründe : I. Verfahrensgang: 1. Mit Bescheid des Bundesamtes für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (im Folgenden: belangte Behörde) vom XXXX, Zl. XXXX, wurde der Antrag von XXXX alias XXXX, geb. XXXX (in weiterer Folge: BF) vom XXXX auf internationalen Schutz hinsichtlich der Zuerkennung des Status des - 2 - Asylberechtigten gemäß § 3 Abs. 1 AsylG (Spruchpunkt I.) und hinsichtlich der Zuerkennung des Status des subsidiär Schutzberechtigten gemäß § 8 AsylG in Bezug auf den Herkunftsstaat Irak (Spruchpunkt II.) abgewiesen. Ein Aufenthaltstitel aus berücksichtigungswürdigen Gründen wurde gemäß § 57 AsylG nicht erteilt (Spruchpunkt III.). Gemäß § 10 Abs. 1 Z 3 AsylG iVm § 9 BFA-VG wurde gegen den BF eine Rückkehrentscheidung gemäß § 52 Absatz 2 Z 2 FPG erlassen (Spruchpunkt IV.) und gemäß § 52 Abs. -
DRAFT MINUTES of the Meeting in Strasbourg on 10 March 1989
*** * * PACECOM078101 * * COUNCIL * A * CONSEIL OF EUROPE * * DE L'EUROPE Parliamentary Assembly Assemblee parlementaire Strasbourg, 15 March 1989 CONFIDENTIAL AALPRIXPV2.40 AS/Loc/Prix (40) PV 2 COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, REGIONAL PLANNING AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES Sub-Committee on the Europe Prize DRAFT MINUTES of the meeting in Strasbourg on 10 March 1989 PRESENT MM AHRENS, Chairman Federal Republic of Germany JUNG, President of the Assembly France HARDY, Chairman of the Committee United Kingdom Lord NEWALL (for Lord Kinnoull) United Kingdom MM THOMPSON United Kingdom VARA Portugal ZIERER Federal Republic of Germany APOLOGISED FOR ABSENCE MM ALEMYR Sweden BLENK Austria Mrs BROGLE-SELE Liechtenstein MM CACCIA Fulvio Switzerland LACOUR France ROBLES OROZCO Spain 20.455 01.52 Forty years Council of Europe Quarante ans Conseil de I'Europe AS/Loc/Prix (40) PV 2 - 2 - The meeting was opened by Mr Ahrens, Chairman, at 9.30 am. 1. AGENDA [AS/Loc/Prix (40) OJ 2] The draft agenda was adopted. 2. MINUTES [AS/Loc/Prix (40) PV 1] Mr Thompson said that the minutes eroneously stated that he had attended the meeting. Amended in this respect, the draft minutes of the meeting in Aalborg on 22 August 1988 were adopted. 3. EUROPE PRIZE, PLAQUES OF HONOUR, FLAGS OF HONOUR AND EUROPEAN DIPLOMAS a. Consideration of candidatures for the Europe Prize The Chairman reminded members of the principle of the Europe Prize, which was awarded annually to a community which had already received a flag of honour and had been a regular candidate for the Europe Prize. Mr Ahrens went through the 13 candidatures proposed by the Secretariat and suggested that the prize be awarded either to the Italian municipality or to one of the French municipalities. -
220 Central Park South Garage Environmental
220 Central Park South Garage Environmental Assessment Statement ULURP #: 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM CEQR #: 16DCP034M Prepared For: NYC Department of City Planning Prepared on Behalf of: VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC Prepared by: Philip Habib & Associates June 16, 2017 220 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH GARAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS EAS Form……................................................................................................Form Attachment A......................................................................Project Description Attachment B..............................................Supplemental Screening Analyses Appendix I..................................................Residential Growth Parking Study Appendix II.................................................LPC Environmental Review Letter EAS Form EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 220 Central Park South Parking Garage EAS 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 16DCP034M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT New York City Department of City Planning VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON -
N 190230 Zry-Voids Text Amendment
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION April 10, 2019, Calendar No. 11 N 190230 ZRY IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by the Department of City Planning pursuant to Section 201 of the New York City Charter for an amendment of Article II, Chapter 3 and related provisions of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York, modifying residential tower regulations to require certain mechanical spaces to be calculated as residential floor area. _____________________________________________________________________________ This application (N 190230 ZRY) for a zoning text amendment was filed by the Department of City Planning (DCP) on January 25, 2019 to discourage the use of excessively tall mechanical floors in high-density residential tower districts. The proposal would require that mechanical floors, typically excluded from zoning floor area calculations, would be counted toward the overall permitted floor area on the zoning lot if they are taller than new specified limits or overly concentrated in portions of the building. The proposed floor area requirements would apply to residential towers in non-contextual R9 and R10 Residence Districts and their equivalent Commercial Districts, as well as Special Purpose Districts that rely on underlying floor area and height and setback regulations or that are primarily residential in character. The provision would also apply to non-residential portions of a mixed-use building if the building contains a limited amount of non-residential floor area. BACKGROUND The New York City Zoning Resolution allows floor space containing mechanical equipment to be excluded from zoning floor area calculations, reflecting the recognition that these spaces perform important and necessary functions within buildings. -
Analysis of Technical Problems in Modern Super-Slim High-Rise Residential Buildings
Budownictwo i Architektura 20(1) 2021, 83-116 DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.2141 Received: 09.07.2020; Revised: 19.11.2020; Accepted: 15.12.2020; Avaliable online: 09.02.2020 © 2020 Budownictwo i Architektura Orginal Article This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 Analysis of technical problems in modern super-slim high-rise residential buildings Jerzy Szołomicki1, Hanna Golasz-Szołomicka2 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego st., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland, [email protected] 0000-0002-1339-4470 2 Faculty of Architecture; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland [email protected] 0000-0002-1125-6162 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a new skyscraper typology which has developed over the recent years – super-tall and slender, needle-like residential towers. This trend appeared on the construction market along with the progress of advanced struc- tural solutions and the high demand for luxury apartments with spectacular views. Two types of constructions can be distinguished within this typology: ultra-luxury super-slim towers with the exclusivity of one or two apartments per floor (e.g. located in Manhattan, New York) and other slender high-rise towers, built in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Bangkok, and Melbourne, among others, which have multiple apartments on each floor. This paper presents a survey of selected slender high-rise buildings, where structural improvements in tall buildings developed over the recent decade are considered from the architectural and structural view. -
An Insight Into the Luxury Residential Market
an insight into the luxury residential market FOREWORD - The “hottest” ranking luxury primary housing market in 2017 and early 2018 have shown robust growth in luxury the world is Victoria, BC, with strong year-on-year luxury real estate sales across most geographical markets. A stable sales volumes and high domestic demand. global economy, a strong stock market, low interest rates and rising consumer confidence served as positive tailwinds for - Santa Fe, New Mexico, is the “hottest” luxury second-home the luxury residential real estate markets. Still, there continue market, reaching sales volumes of million-dollar-plus homes to be a multitude of issues presenting both opportunities and not seen since pre-crisis years. challenges for prime property investors and sellers across - Trophy home sales dipped in 2017—only three homes the globe. Luxury markets are increasingly impacted by achieved the US$100 million+ “billionaire’s benchmark”— macroeconomic factors from political uncertainty, natural as the year’s 10 most expensive homes sold worldwide for disasters and terrorism fears to high equity prices, shifting aggregate of $1.24 billion, down from $1.32 billion in 2016. buyer demographics, currency risks, and increased taxes and - Star architects are now almost a prerequisite for high-end buying restrictions on residential real estate. residential developments, dominating the landscape of This year’s Luxury Defined presents insights into the world emerging luxury corridors like West Chelsea in New York. of luxury real estate and captures the collective wisdom and - Inventory constraints remained an issue in many prime insights of our global network—comprised of 27,000 agents property markets, as buyers from different, traditionally operating out of 940 offices globally—as well as specialists non-competing demographic and lifestyle cohorts competed from the broader Christie’s world. -
240 Central Park South Apartments
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 25, 2002, Designation List 337 LP-2116 240 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH APARTMENTS, 240 Central Park South (aka 232-246 Central Park South (West 59th Street), 233-241West58th Street, and 1792-1810Broadway), Manhattan. Built 1939-40; [Albert] Mayer & [Julian H.] Whittlesey, architects; J.H. Taylor Construction Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1030, Lot 58. On April 30, 2002, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of 240 Central Park South Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nineteen people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Central Park South Associates (the property's owners), Manhattan Borough President C. Virginia Fields, CityCouncilmember Eva Moskowitz, New York Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried, Municipal Art Society, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, Landmark West!, DOCOMOMO New York Tri-State, Modern Architecture Working Group, and architect-historian Robert A.M. Stern. One speaker opposed designation. In addition, the Commission received numerous letters and postcards in support of designation, including a resolution from Community Board 5 and letters from City Councilmember Christine C. Quinn, former Councilmember Ronnie M. Eldridge, Friends of Terra Cotta, National Society of Mural Painters, and Art Deco Society of New York. Summary 240 Central Park South Apartments, built in 1939-40 to the design of Mayer & Whittlesey, is a significant and innovative complex that represents the transition between 1930s Art Deco style apartment towers with courtyards (characteristic of Central Park West) and post-World War II "modernist" apartment houses. -
Budapester Altbauquartiere Im Revitalisierungsprozess Kovács, Zoltán; Wiessner, Reinhard; Zischner, Romy
www.ssoar.info Budapester Altbauquartiere im Revitalisierungsprozess Kovács, Zoltán; Wiessner, Reinhard; Zischner, Romy Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Kovács, Z., Wiessner, R., & Zischner, R. (2007). Budapester Altbauquartiere im Revitalisierungsprozess. Europa Regional, 15.2007(3), 153-165. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48056-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner -
CITYREALTY NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT MANHATTAN NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT May 2015 Summary
MAY 2015 MANHATTAN NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT CITYREALTY NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT MANHATTAN NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT May 2015 Summary Apartment prices in new development condominiums in Manhattan have increased at a fast clip, a trend boosted by the upper end of the market. Sales of new condominium units included in this report are expected to aggregate between $27.6 and $33.6 billion in sales through 2019. The average price of these new development units is expected to reach a record of $5.9 million per unit in 2015. At the same time, far fewer units are being built than during the last development boom, in the mid-2000s, therefore the number of closed sales is expected to increase more modestly than their prices. 2013 2014 2015-2019* TOTAL NEW DEVELOPMENT SALES $2.7B $4.1B $27.6B-$33.6B+ Pricing information for the 4,881 new development units covered in this report comes from active and in-contract listings, offering plans, and projections based on listing prices. For a complete list of buildings included in this report, see pages 5-6 (New Developments by Building Detail). Ultimately, sales of these apartments will total roughly $27.6 to $33.6 billion through 2019. Sales in new developments totaled $4.1 billion in 2014, up 50 percent from 2013. The 2013 total, $2.7 billion, also represented a significant increase from the $1.9 billion recorded in 2012. While total sales volume has increased in recent years, it is still substantially less than at the height of the market, in 2008, when new development sales totaled $10.4 billion. -
Condos for New on Billionaires'
September 5, 2019 https://therealdeal.com/2019/09/05/serial-buyers-trade-old-condos-for-new-on-billionaires-row/ Serial buyers trade “old” condos for new on Billionaires’ Row Sting, Daniel Och and Bob Diamond are just a few who’ve left 15 CPW for “newer” condos By E.B. Solomont For many, a move coincides with a huge life event — relocating when a marriage begins or ends, upsizing to make room for a new baby or downsizing when kids move out. But for an uber-rich set of buyers in Manhattan, it comes down to shininess. Over the past few months, serial buyers with deep pockets have swapped “older” condos for new ones. They’ve traded Central Park West for Park Avenue; limestone for a glass curtain wall; Christian de Portzamparc for Robert A.M. Stern. Take Sting and his wife, Trudie, who paid $65.7 million for a penthouse at 220 Central Park South after unloading their pad at 15 Central Park West for a cool $50 million. The couple paid $26.5 million at 15 CPW in 2008, records show. Or the rocker’s neighbor, Daniel Och, who is reportedly among the buyers at 220 CPS and recently listed his penthouse at 15 CPW for $57.5 million. Real estate developers are doing it, too. This summer, Related Companies boss Stephen Ross listed his Time Warner Center penthouse — which he received as a “distribution” — for $75 million. Now, Ross is moving west, to his company’s Hudson Yards megadevelopment. “There’s a certain personality that wants the new ‘It,’ whether it’s a handbag, car, vacation spot or home,” said Douglas Elliman’s Noble Black.