Christian Spolia in the Late Antique Mosque at Shivta in the Negev Desert (Israel) *
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ECA 8 (2011), p. 101-119; doi: 10.2143 / ECA.8.0.2961368 Crosses’ Work Underfoot: Christian Spolia in the Late Antique Mosque at Shivta in the Negev Desert (Israel) * Glenn PEERS Scholars have productively studied the re-use of of reasons, some of which are perfectly evident architectural materials in Late Antiquity from the from their supercessionist vantage point. Likewise, point of view of practical, aesthetic and ideological at the end of this period, Muslims had a compli- motivations, and the number of those motivations, cated relationship to religions they encountered, as well as responses, marks a distinctive character- primarily Christianity, because that faith was closely istic of this period in relation to classical Antiquity. associated, naturally, with the empire that Islamic The almost-bricolage of the Arch of Constantine in forces contended against. This article examines one Rome (315) represents a sophisticated, rich demon- such encounter, which led to the integration of stration of the past in the present and, more to the Christian building materials into an early Islamic point, in its service1. Christians manipulated mate- mosque in the small town of Shivta (present-day rial remnants of the past, too, for a large number name, but also called Sbeita, Esbeita, Subeita, Isbayta) in the central Negev desert, some 50 kms south of modern Beer Sheeva (Fig. 1). There, clearly Christian materials had highly public and agonistic placement, but the motivations were not necessarily, or only, adversarial. They were faceted and not reducible to an antagonistic social model2. They were available for complicated understand- ings of the ongoing power and prestige that Islam was in the process of appropriating to itself. The town of Shivta has been the object of study by numerous travelers and archaeologists, along with other settlements in the Negev, a forbidding but deeply affecting desert terrain (Fig. 2)3. Leonard Woolley (1880-1960) and T.E. Lawrence (1888- 1935) visited the site in the spring of 1914, and their account of the region still stands as a useful and even romantic treatment of the historical remains and vivid landscape (Pl. 1)4. Their study * Many thanks to Samer Ali, Katia Cytryn-Silverman, Karni Golan, Mattia Guidetti, Mat Immerzeel, Amy Papalexan- drou, Na’ama Pat-El, and to Silvia Krapiwko and Aries Rochman-Halperin at the archive of the Israel Antiquities Authority. My colleague Stephennie Mulder read a version of this article and offered excellent advice. 1 See now Brilliant/Kinney 2011. 2 See Hayden et al. 2011. 3 On the region, see Erez Edelson 2006; Haiman 1995; Fig. 1. Map of the Negev, with principal sites marked Evenari/Shaman/Tadmor 1971. (from Figueras 1995a) 4 Woolley/Lawrence 2003, 97-120. 101 95300_ECA8(2011)_07.indd 101 27/02/13 15:23 was only a survey, nevertheless, but Shivta has suf- fered such intense scrutiny over the decades with the result of very few accurate archaeological reports. In fact, the site is woefully under-pub- lished, despite the attentions of Israeli archaeolo- gists in the last half-century5. The general outlines of the town, and its principal buildings, were known when Harris Dunscombe Colt, Jr. (1901- 1973), an American archaeologist, received permis- sion from British authorities to commence excava- tion at Shivta in 1933. His team worked at the site for several seasons, before being distracted by the nearby site of Nessana, which led to important finds and publications. Those excavations at Shivta were terminated at the end of 1938, when the dig house, along with its finds, equipment, and records, were destroyed6. The Colt excavations, then, were very poorly recorded, and many finds were lost, but they did lead to the uncovering of a fascinating aspect of the last phase of Shivta’s history, a mosque attached to the baptistery of the south church Fig. 2. Map of Shivta (after Segal 1985, Fig. 4) (Pls 2-3). The mosque is a modestly sized structure, and it comprises a small courtyard that leads into a cov- ered prayer room, a very unusual feature in the Negev, in fact (Pls 4-5). It was fit into a trapezoidal area that abutted the baptistery and domestic struc- tures, and opened onto the plaza that contained a large reservoir. The baptistery belonged to the south church, which also accommodated itself to the pre-existing urban fabric, as the town predates Christianity. The arrival of the new religion in the seventh century did not necessitate clearing ground for a freestanding architectural statement, and that situation holds for most of the region during the Pl. 1. View toward Shivta from Mitzpe Shivta Early Islamic period7. In fact, the size of the (photograph: author) mosque indicates that the number of Muslim men was never large, and comparing the mosque with 5 That is not to say that scholars have not published aspects the three churches at Shivta, along with their sub- of the site or attempted to integrate the site into regional sidiary buildings, makes evident the inhabitants of studies. See Erickson-Gini 2010, 31-32; Harris 2007; Late Antique/post-conquest Shivta were predomi- Hirschfeld 2003; Rubin 1997; Tsafrir/Di Segno/Green 8 1994, 234; Negev 1993; Shereshevski 1991, 61-82; Segal nantly Christian . Muslims were not necessarily a 1983; Gutwein 1981, 89-93; Ovadiah 1970, 166-173. On dominant force in the Late Antique Negev, even if the Early Islamic period, see Ribak 2007, 217-218; the forms and presence of Byzantine authority were Petersen 2005, 62-64; Magness 2003, 185-187; Negev 9 1982. gone . The town was unusual in the Negev for 6 AT/64/6, letter of January 1939. continuing to produce inscriptions commemorat- 7 Guidetti, forthcoming. ing burials, as well as a new floor in the south 8 Rubin 1997. church in 639, for example10. Six kilometers away 9 Guidetti 2009a, 4. 10 Negev 1981, 47-67; idem 1990, 354. from the town is a large monastic community, now 11 Caner 2010, 255 n. 13; Harris 2007, 44; Figueras 1995a, called Mitzpe Shivta, scarcely excavated, but with 420-423; Ovadiah 1970, 138-139. impressive and widespread remains (Pl. 6)11. Shivta 102 95300_ECA8(2011)_07.indd 102 27/02/13 15:23 Pl. 2. View of Mosque and South Church, Shivta (photograph courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority Archives, Israel Antiquities Authority Archives: British Mandate Records Files: file no. 71, Isbeita, photograph 9918) Pl. 3. View of Mosque and South Church, Shivta (photograph courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority Archives, Israel Antiquities Authority Archives: British Mandate Records Files: file no. 71, Isbeita, photograph 9919) 103 95300_ECA8(2011)_07.indd 103 27/02/13 15:24 Pl. 4. View of Mosque, Shivta (photograph courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority, Israel Antiquities Authority Archives: British Mandate Records Files: file no. 71, Isbeita, photograph 9932) Pl. 5. View of Mosque, Shivta (photograph courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority Archives, Israel Antiquities Authority Archives: British Mandate Records Files: file no. 71, Isbeita, photograph 9933) 104 95300_ECA8(2011)_07.indd 104 27/02/13 15:24 junction of places of worship in this period, Mus- lim mosque and Christian baptistery, is naturally significant, but in the second, the use of spolia was not only antagonistic and competitive, but like the placement, part of an attempt on the part of the town’s Muslims to use these Christian markers for protective power, for mapping social worlds, and for marking zones of sanctity. In other words, the builders and users of this new addition to Late Antique Shivta engaged in a creative re-making of the urban, social, and religious fabric of the town that spoke with and manipulated Christian stones. Pl. 6. View of Mitzpe Shivta (photograph author) The most immediately apparent significance of this deployment of spolia by the new Muslim mas- ters of Shivta is deprecatory, that is Muslim feet therefore supported three sizeable churches within were being invited to tread on the crosses as a sign its perimeter and was evidently connected with a of dominance of Islam and powerlessness of Chris- prosperous satellite monastic community, as well. tianity. Of course, many such examples can be Likewise, it is the only town with a covered cited to prove the mastery of a religion and its fol- mosque12. These aspects reveal strong communities lowers through subjugation of another’s holy signs of both Christians and Muslims, and prosperity and representations. Triumphantly passing over the deep into Late Antiquity. unresisting markers of another’s power was a long- That relative scale needs to be borne in mind for established trope by the Late Antique period. For understanding the choices made by the builders example, Sudanese conquerors of the Roman col- and patrons of the new Islamic house of worship, ony at Meroe cut off the head of the bronze statue for the photographs of the Colt expedition record of the emperor Augustus and buried it under the the original arrangement of the steps leading from steps of their own temple dedicated to victory; all the reservoir plaza into the anteroom of the mosque who entered inevitably (and at least for a time, (Pls 3, 5, 7-8). The upper step and part of the lin- knowingly) trod on the head of the defeated tel leading into the mosque itself are re-used stones enemy14. The builders of the synagogue at Sardis from a Christian building, or at least had been also placed a relief of Artemis and Cybele face intended for such a building. The stones’ upward- down in the forecourt, as a sign, it would seem, of turned faces show two crosses between two com- their faith’s rightness and of authorities’ collusion pass-produced rosettes (the left-hand stone is quite in that statement15.