DOCSLIB.ORG

Number System in Arabic and English: a Comparative Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Number System in Arabic and English: a Comparative Analysis International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2014): 5.611 Number System in Arabic and English: A Comparative Analysis Mohamed .A1, S. A. Shanavas2 1Associate Professor (Retired), E.M.E.A College, Kondotty 2Associate Professor, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Kerala deleted in some nouns will be restored before the ي Unlike English and many other languages, Arabic has three final ،أخى، دًى،فى، ) in the five nouns و aani’. The dropped‘اٌ numbers: singular, dual and plural. Dual are suffix أر .father أة: أثىاٌ aani’e.g‘ اٌ is restored before adding (رواثى morphologically marked in Arabic whereas in English the marbuuTa is added toحbrother. If the feminine marker أخىاٌ: number two plus plural is used to mark the dual. For ّ لطخ : .e.g د example two cities, two buildings etc are used while in a singular noun, it will be changed into regular . د cat .’ t’ marbuuTa is turned into the regularلطتبٌ Arabic ‘madiinataani’ ‘binaaʾaani’ are used instead of ‘ithnataa- mudn-in or ithnataaabniyat-in’. In respect of number, Sanskrit is similar to Arabic. 2. Plural Formation In Arabic 1. Dual Formation in Arabic There are two types of plurals in Arabic: the regular and jamʿsaalim جًع عبنى irregular. The regular type is known a ʾuuna is added to the singular form if theؤٌ In order to form dual in Arabic, a dual suffix is added to a where a suffix madiinat +-aani = noun is in nominative case. If it is in accusative or genitive‘ يذَخ+آٌ =يذيُتبٌ .singular stem e.g /يغهًىٌ:يغهى يغهًيٍ is added to the stem. E.g ئيٍ madiinat-aani’. ( two cities). The suffix –aani or ayni case the suffix‘ depending on case will be used to form dual. If the noun is /muslim-un : muslimuuna / muslimiina / Mualims. is added to آد in nominative case, -aani is used. If it is in accusative or In order to mark the soundfeminine plural .muslimaat/ Muslim women /يغهًبد .genitive case –ayni is used to mark the dual the singular form e.g the) جًع انتكغيش two ambassadors The irregular plural which is known asوصم عفيشاٌ number.WaSalasafiinaani beween two ambassadors. broken plural) are very many in Arabic. They are knownثيٍ عفيشيٍ arrived.‘baynasafiirayni they visited two ambassadors. as broken plural because unlike sound plural, the structureصاسواعفيشيZaaruusafiirayniٍ The word ‘safiiraani’ in the first example is the subject of of the singular form is not preserved in the plural either by / Sinw-un : Sinwan-un / صُى : صُىاٌ the verb waSala and is in nominative case. But in the second addingsomething as in :tuxmat‘ تخًخ : تخى example the word ‘safiirayni’ is the second term of an one of twin brothers or subtracting as in عذ : أعذ annexation structure and in genitive case. The same word in tuxam’ ‘indigestion’ or changing the singular as in ʾasad: ʾusd ‘lion’ or by changing the form coupled withأ the third example is in accusative case as it is the object of man’ or changing is‘ سجم :سجبل the verb ‘zaaruu’. The rule is applicable only if the letters in addition as inrajul: rijaal rasuul: rusul‘ سعىل: سعم man’ coupled with subtraction as‘سجم the base word are regular ( sound).e.g.rajlun with ‘ya’ messenger. ( ibnu-Hishaam,264). The most common (يُمىصخ twomen’, or defective‘سجﻻٌ rajulaani judge broken plural patterns are listed here under triptote and أنمبظending preceded by kasra e.g. al-qaaDiiً .qaaDyaani’ two judges. diptote categories‘لبظيبaaniٌ+ afʿul/ This pattern is used as a plural for faʿl as a/ أفعم (1 ’with the ending of alif noun having the sound ʿayn’ irrespective of its ‘laam(يمصىسح) If the base word is defective كهت’e.g. ‘kalb و ya’ or ‘ يpreceded by fatHa, there are two types of duals: in one of being sound or defective by deer. The plural form of ظجً’cub‘Daby ,جشو’It occurs in three dog‘jarw .ي ’which the alif is to be changed into ‘ya eyes’ is irregular. This is the pattern for a‘أعيٍ aʿyun دجهً cases: one where the alif occurs after three letters as in Hublayaani’ feminine noun having four original letters ,the third of‘دجهيبٌ Hublaa’ pregnant the dual of which is‘ ’ʿuqaabثعمب ,Diraaʿرساع as in يذّحtwo pregnant women. In the second case the alif which which is maddah .forearm, eagle فتً as in ي’occurs as the third letter is a substitute of ‘ya ʾafʿaal/ This pattern is for trilateral noun to which/أفعبل (in the dual 2ي fataa’ young man, the alif is to be changed into‘ isdefectiveعيٍ cannot be the plural form as its أفعم ’daxalama ahu –l ssijnafatayaani‘ دخم يعه ّانغٍ فتيبٌ .form e.g ثىة اثىاة: two young men entered the jail with him’. The third case is e.g‘ afʿila/ It is the plural of a masculine quadriteral/أفعهخbut is used for 3) 3 ي’that where alif is not a substitute of ‘ya اغعًخ:غعبو .e.g يذّحMataa’ which is used as a proper noun whose third letter is maddah‘يتً prolongation asin loaf of bread سغيف: أسغفخ matayaani’. The second type is food‘ يتيبnoun. Its dual form isٌ فتً : فتيخ ’fiʿla/ It is the plural form of ‘fatan/ فعهخwhich occurs 4) 4 و ’that where ‘alif’ is to be changed into ‘waa fuʿala/ It is the regular plural form for the/ فعهخin two cases: the asif is a substitute of ‘wa’ as in ‘ ʿaSa’ stick 5) 5 whose فبعم aSawaani’ two adjective of human beings on the pattern‘ عصىاand its dual isٌعصىwhose origin isعصب غبص:لبض ساو:لعبح ، :غضاح، سيبح sticks or the alif is not the substitute of ‘waa’ and is not used ‘laam’ is defective as in نذ Ladaaif it is used as a proper noun نذي.for prolongation e.g takeاءLadawaani. Nouns ending with the feminine markerواٌ chameleon. The دشثبء دشثبواٌ: .before the suffix.e.g و’a ‘waa Volume 5 Issue 3, March 2016 www.ijsr.net Paper ID: NOV162036 Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 1163 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2014): 5.611 .jauhar : jawaahir / gem/جىهش : جىاهش as noun as in فىعم faʿ ala/ It is used as plural of an adjective ofhuman/ فعهخ (6 / Saumaʿ t: Sawaamiʿ/صىيعخ : صىايع fauʿala/ as/ فىعهخ كبيم:كًهخ، being whose ‘laam’ is sound as in .monastery عبدش:عذشح،عبفش:عفشح ّ ،ثبس:ثشسح xaatam : xawaatim / ring/خبتى : خىاتى faaʿal / as/ فبعم faʿlaa/ It is used as plural for an adjective used as/فعهً (7 / qaaSiʿaaʾ : qawaaSiʿ/لبصعبء : لىاصع faaʿilaaʾ / as/ فبعﻻء :جشدً ، passive participle in the pattern ‘faʿiil’ as in .a type stone اعيش:أعشي، لتيم:لتهىجشيخ jaaʾiz : jawaaʾiz/ gift / جبئض:جىائض faaʿil / as noun / فبعم fiʿala/ It is used as a plural form of ‘fuʿl’ pattern as/فعهخ (8 HaaʾiD /دبئط : دىائط as a feminine adjective as in فبعم لشغ:لشغخ، دسج: دسجخ ّ،دة :دثجخ ،كىص :كىصح in .fuʿʿal/ Used as a plural form for a singular adjective : HawaaʾiD/a lady who menstruatesفعّم (9 .Taaliq: Tawaaliq / devorsed / :غىانمطبنك دب ئط : دبئط on the pattern ‘faaʿil’ or ‘ faaʿila’ as in It can generally be used in all feminine ) فعبئم (18 : دي ّعُبئذخ : َّىح weather itيذّح ’fuʿʿaal/ It is used as plural form for an adjective on quadriliterals whose third letter is ‘ maddaفعّبل (10 :saHaabat/ عذبثخ : عذبئتis marked by ‘ta’ marbuuta as in صبئى : ّصى او ،دبكى : ّدك بو ، لبسئ : ّلشاء asin فبعم the pattern fiʿaal/ used as plural for thirteen singular forms ( saHaaʾib/ cloud or not marked for feminine gender but/فعبل (11 /ʿajuuz: ʿajaaiz / عجىص : عجبئض faʿl-un, faʿla-tun/ is used a feminine as in/ ، فعهخ فعم :nouns/adjectives) .They are .old woman كعت : كعبة ، لصعخ : لصبع ّ،يشح .both as nouns or adjctives.e faʿaalii / This plural form is generally used in/ ) فعبنً (faʿal-un, faʿalat-un/ that is not derived 19/ فعم،فعهخ :يشاس :jamal, seven singular patterns which are listed below/ : جًبل جًم from defective or geminate as in ʿadhraaʾ : ʿadhaarii / a/ : عزاسي عزساءfaʿlaaʿ/ as/فعﻻء .1 : ثًبس ثًشح,jabal: jibaal. moutainججم , camel : ججبل ,jimaal .virgin رئت : رئبة .fiʿl,fuʿl/ e.g/،فعهفعم .thamart, thimaar/ fruit / maumaat :mawaammin / a/ يىيبح :يىاو faʿlaat /as /فعﻻح .rumH : rimaaH/ lance, 2/سيخ : سيبح ,Diʾb: Diʾaab/ wolf/ .large desert : ظشاف .e.gفبعم that has the meaningفعيم، فعيهخ .spear siʿlaat : siʿaalin/ a ghoul/: ععبنغعﻻح / fi ʿlat /فعﻻح kariim: 3/ كشيى : كشاو,zariif: ziraaf/graceful, chaming/ ظشيف hibriyat: habaarin/ a rough /هجشيخ :هجبس fiʿliyat/ as / فعهيخ .kiraam/ noble. 4 .shariif: shiraaf/honorable. ground / : ششافششيف ʿarquwat: ʿaraaqin / a /عشلىح : عشاق faʿluwat/ as/ فعهىح .faʿlaan/ as an adjective and its feminine 5/ فعﻻٌ، stick that is put horizontally on a bucket.( 276, AuDaH l عطشبٌ .faʿlaa/e.g / فعهً /faʿlaana/ فعﻻَخ،gender .( fuʿlaan/ as an masaalik/ فعﻻʿaTshaan: ʿiTaash\thirastyٌ/:عطبػ ʿadhraaʾ : ʿadhaarin / a / عزساء : عزاسي faʿaalaa/ as/ ) فعبنً (fuʿlaana/ 20 /فعﻻَخ adjective and its feminine gender .xumSaan: ximaaS/ lean, slim. vergin/ خًصبٌ :خًبص fatwa: fataawaa / a formal /فتىي: فتبوي faʿlaa/ as/ فعهً.faʿil/ 1/ فعمfuʿuul/ It is general in four forms: One is/ )فعىل (12 daʿwaa : daʿaawaa / a/دعىي : دعبوي .namir, numuur /leopard, tiger, and the legal opinion / ًَش : ًَىس .e.g remaining three are the trilateral noun the ‘ʿayn’ of claim. Hublaa: Habaalaa/ a/ دجهً :دجبنً fuʿlaa/ as / فعهً .2 فهظ : فهىط which has ‘sukuun’ and its ‘fa’has fatHa as in xunthaa : xayaathaa / a / خُثً :خُبثً.Dirs: Duruus/ pregnant woman/ ظشط : ظشوط fals:fuluus/ orkasra as in/ .jund:junuud/ army. hermaphrodite/ جُىد :جُذ or Damma as in / Hayraan : Hayaaraa /ديشاٌ : ديبسي faʿlaan/ as/ فعﻻٌ fuʿuul/ as 3/ فعىل :fiʿlaan/ It is general in four/ ) فعﻻٌ (13 .fuʿal/ as perplexed/ فعم,ghurab: ghirbaan/ crow/,غشاة : غشثبٌ in faʿaaliyy / .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does English Have a Genitive Case? [email protected]
    2. Amy Rose Deal – University of Massachusetts, Amherst Does English have a genitive case? [email protected] In written English, possessive pronouns appear without ’s in the same environments where non-pronominal DPs require ’s. (1) a. your/*you’s/*your’s book b. Moore’s/*Moore book What explains this complementarity? Various analyses suggest themselves. A. Possessive pronouns are contractions of a pronoun and ’s. (Hudson 2003: 603) B. Possessive pronouns are inflected genitives (Huddleston and Pullum 2002); a morphological deletion rule removes clitic ’s after a genitive pronoun. Analysis A consists of a single rule of a familiar type: Morphological Merger (Halle and Marantz 1993), familiar from forms like wanna and won’t. (His and its contract especially nicely.) No special lexical/vocabulary items need be postulated. Analysis B, on the other hand, requires a set of vocabulary items to spell out genitive case, as well as a rule to delete the ’s clitic following such forms, assuming ’s is a DP-level head distinct from the inflecting noun. These two accounts make divergent predictions for dialects with complex pronominals such as you all or you guys (and us/them all, depending on the speaker). Since Merger operates under adjacency, Analysis A predicts that intervention by all or guys should bleed the formation of your: only you all’s and you guys’ are predicted. There do seem to be dialects with this property, as witnessed by the American Heritage Dictionary (4th edition, entry for you-all). Call these English 1. Here, we may claim that pronouns inflect for only two cases, and Merger operations account for the rest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Term Declension, the Three Basic Qualities of Latin Nouns, That
    Chapter 2: First Declension Chapter 2 covers the following: the term declension, the three basic qualities of Latin nouns, that is, case, number and gender, basic sentence structure, subject, verb, direct object and so on, the six cases of Latin nouns and the uses of those cases, the formation of the different cases in Latin, and the way adjectives agree with nouns. At the end of this lesson we’ll review the vocabulary you should memorize in this chapter. Declension. As with conjugation, the term declension has two meanings in Latin. It means, first, the process of joining a case ending onto a noun base. Second, it is a term used to refer to one of the five categories of nouns distinguished by the sound ending the noun base: /a/, /ŏ/ or /ŭ/, a consonant or /ĭ/, /ū/, /ē/. First, let’s look at the three basic characteristics of every Latin noun: case, number and gender. All Latin nouns and adjectives have these three grammatical qualities. First, case: how the noun functions in a sentence, that is, is it the subject, the direct object, the object of a preposition or any of many other uses? Second, number: singular or plural. And third, gender: masculine, feminine or neuter. Every noun in Latin will have one case, one number and one gender, and only one of each of these qualities. In other words, a noun in a sentence cannot be both singular and plural, or masculine and feminine. Whenever asked ─ and I will ask ─ you should be able to give the correct answer for all three qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Gothic
    Introduction to Gothic By David Salo Organized to PDF by CommanderK Table of Contents 3..........................................................................................................INTRODUCTION 4...........................................................................................................I. Masculine 4...........................................................................................................II. Feminine 4..............................................................................................................III. Neuter 7........................................................................................................GOTHIC SOUNDS: 7............................................................................................................Consonants 8..................................................................................................................Vowels 9....................................................................................................................LESSON 1 9.................................................................................................Verbs: Strong verbs 9..........................................................................................................Present Stem 12.................................................................................................................Nouns 14...................................................................................................................LESSON 2 14...........................................................................................Strong
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: a Case Study from Koro
    Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro By Jessica Cleary-Kemp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Assistant Professor Peter S. Jenks Professor William F. Hanks Summer 2015 © Copyright by Jessica Cleary-Kemp All Rights Reserved Abstract Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro by Jessica Cleary-Kemp Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair In this dissertation a methodology for identifying and analyzing serial verb constructions (SVCs) is developed, and its application is exemplified through an analysis of SVCs in Koro, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. SVCs involve two main verbs that form a single predicate and share at least one of their arguments. In addition, they have shared values for tense, aspect, and mood, and they denote a single event. The unique syntactic and semantic properties of SVCs present a number of theoretical challenges, and thus they have invited great interest from syntacticians and typologists alike. But characterizing the nature of SVCs and making generalizations about the typology of serializing languages has proven difficult. There is still debate about both the surface properties of SVCs and their underlying syntactic structure. The current work addresses some of these issues by approaching serialization from two angles: the typological and the language-specific. On the typological front, it refines the definition of ‘SVC’ and develops a principled set of cross-linguistically applicable diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 40 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall 2008 2008 Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C. Farrell Quinnipiac University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert C. Farrell, Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions, 40 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 1 (2008). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol40/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C. Farrell* I. INTRODUCTION Does it matter that the editors of thirty-three law journals, including those at Yale and Michigan, think that there is a "passive tense"? l Does it matter that the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth2 and Eleventh3 Circuits think that there is a "passive mood"? Does it matter that the editors of fourteen law reviews think that there is a "subjunctive tense"?4 Does it matter that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit thinks that there is a "subjunctive voice'"? 5 There is, in fact, no "passive tense" or "passive mood." The passive is a voice. 6 There is no "subjunctive voice" or "subjunctive tense." The subjunctive is a mood.7 The examples in the first paragraph suggest that there is widespread unfamiliarity among lawyers and law students * B.A., Trinity College; J.D., Harvard University; Professor, Quinnipiac University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Objective and Subjective Genitives
    Objective and Subjective Genitives To this point, there have been three uses of the Genitive Case. They are possession, partitive, and description. Many genitives which have been termed possessive, however, actually are not. When a Genitive Case noun is paired with certain special nouns, the Genitive has a special relationship with the other noun, based on the relationship of a noun to a verb. Many English and Latin nouns are derived from verbs. For example, the word “love” can be used either as a verb or a noun. Its context tells us how it is being used. The patriot loves his country. The noun country is the Direct Object of the verb loves. The patriot has a great love of his country. The noun country is still the object of loving, but now loving is expressed as a noun. Thus, the genitive phrase of his country is called an Objective Genitive. You have actually seen a number of Objective Genitives. Another common example is Rex causam itineris docuit. The king explained the cause of the journey (the thing that caused the journey). Because “cause” can be either a noun or a verb, when it is used as a noun its Direct Object must be expressed in the Genitive Case. A number of Latin adjectives also govern Objective Genitives. For example, Vir miser cupidus pecuniae est. A miser is desirous of money. Some special nouns and adjectives in Latin take Objective Genitives which are more difficult to see and to translate. The adjective peritus, -a, - um, meaning “skilled” or “experienced,” is one of these: Nautae sunt periti navium.
    [Show full text]
  • Genitive Case
    GENITIVE CASE The Genitive is the third and last case existing in both English and Latin. In English, all pronouns have a genitive case that shows possession: "his", "her", "my", "their", "whose", etc. These answer the question "Belonging to whom or what?" Regular nouns in English also have a genitive form: in the singular, the ending "'s" is added; in the plural, s'. Consider the following examples: Their father is here. The man's father is here. The boys' father is here. In Latin, the Genitive case may also show possession. However, it may be used for some other things as well, as you will see later on. It's ending of course varies depending on the original ending of the noun: for a-nouns, the singular is -ae and the plural is -ārum; for both us- and um-nouns, the singular is -ī and the plural is - ōrum. Consider the following chart: Nominative, Accusative, and Genitive Cases a-nouns us-nouns um-nouns sg. pl. sg. pl. sg. pl. Nominative a ae us ī um a Accusative Genitive ae ārum ī ōrum ī ōrum A genitive is normally paired with another noun in the sentence which it modifies. In English, it is always placed immediately before the noun it modifies: for example, "my soup", "the boy's shirt", etc. But in Latin, a genitive may be placed either before or after the noun it modifies: for example, feminae panes, panes feminae. In fact, a genitive may occasionally even be separated by another word: panes sunt feminae. Also, keep in mind that the grammatical possession that the genitive case signifies is a fairly broad and vague connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Verbs and Essential Grammar Review
    Spanish Verbs and Essential Grammar Review Prepared by: Professor Carmen L. Torres-Robles Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures Purdue University Calumet Revised: 1 /2003 Layout by: Nancy J. Tilka CONTENTS Spanish Verbs Introduction 4 Indicative Mood 5 ® simple & compound tenses: present, past, future, conditional Subjunctive Mood 12 ® simple & compound tenses: present, past Ser / Estar 16 Essential Grammar Pronouns 20 Possesive Adjectives and Pronouns 23 Prepositional Pronouns 25 Por versus Para 27 Comparisons / Superlatives 31 Preterite / Imperfect 34 Subjunctive Mood 37 Commands 42 Passive Voice 46 2 Spanish Verbs 3 INTRODUCTION VERBS (VERBOS) MOODS (MODOS) There are three moods or ways to express verbs (actions) in Spanish. 1. Indicative Mood (objective) 2. Subjunctive Mood (subjective) 3. Imperative Mood (commands) INFINITIVES (INFINITIVOS) A verb in the purest form (without a noun or subject pronoun to perform the action) is called an infinitive. The infinitives in English are characterized by the prefix “to” + “verb form”, the Spanish infinitives are identified by the “r” ending. Example estudiar, comer, dormir to study, to eat, to sleep CONJUGATIONS (CONJUGACIONES) Spanish verbs are grouped in three categories or conjugations. 1. Infinitives ending in –ar belong to the first conjugation. (estudiar) 2. Infinitives ending in –er belong to the second conjugation. (comer) 3. Infinitives ending in –ir belong to the third conjugation. (dormir) VERB STRUCTURE (ESTRUCTURA VERBAL) Spanish verbs are divided into three parts. (infinitive: estudiar) 1. Stem or Root (estudi-) 2. Theme Vowel (-a-) 3. "R" Ending (-r) CONJUGATED VERBS (VERBOS CONJUGADOS) To conjugate a verb, a verb must have an explicit subject noun (ex: María), a subject pronoun (yo, tú, usted, él, ella, nosotros(as), vosotros(as), ustedes, ellos, ellas), or an implicit subject, to indicate the performer of the action.
    [Show full text]
  • 30. Tense Aspect Mood 615
    30. Tense Aspect Mood 615 Richards, Ivor Armstrong 1936 The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rockwell, Patricia 2007 Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycho- linguistic Research 36: 361−369. Rosenblum, Doron 5. March 2004 Smart he is not. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/smart-he-is-not- 1.115908. Searle, John 1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seddiq, Mirriam N. A. Why I don’t want to talk to you. http://notguiltynoway.com/2004/09/why-i-dont-want- to-talk-to-you.html. Singh, Onkar 17. December 2002 Parliament attack convicts fight in court. http://www.rediff.com/news/ 2002/dec/17parl2.htm [Accessed 24 July 2013]. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Voegele, Jason N. A. http://www.jvoegele.com/literarysf/cyberpunk.html Voyer, Daniel and Cheryl Techentin 2010 Subjective acoustic features of sarcasm: Lower, slower, and more. Metaphor and Symbol 25: 1−16. Ward, Gregory 1983 A pragmatic analysis of epitomization. Papers in Linguistics 17: 145−161. Ward, Gregory and Betty J. Birner 2006 Information structure. In: B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), Handbook of English Lin- guistics, 291−317. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rachel Giora, Tel Aviv, (Israel) 30. Tense Aspect Mood 1. Introduction 2. Metaphor: EVENTS ARE (PHYSICAL) OBJECTS 3. Polysemy, construal, profiling, and coercion 4. Interactions of tense, aspect, and mood 5. Conclusion 6. References 1. Introduction In the framework of cognitive linguistics we approach the grammatical categories of tense, aspect, and mood from the perspective of general cognitive strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Differences Between Spoken and Written Grammar in English, in Comparison with Vietnamese1
    GIST EDUCATION AND LEARNING RESEARCH JOURNAL. ISSN 1692-5777. NO. 11, (JULY - DECEMBER) 2015. pp. 138-153. The Differences between Spoken and Written Grammar in English, in Comparison 1 with Vietnamese Las Diferencias entre la Gramática Oral y Escrita del Idioma Inglés en Comparación con el Idioma Vietnamita Nguyen Cao Thanh2* Tan Trao University, Vietnam Abstract The fundamental point of this paper is to describe and evaluate some differences between spoken and written grammar in English, and compare some of the points with Vietnamese. This paper illustrates that spoken grammar is less rigid than written grammar. Moreover, it highlights the distinction between speaking and writing in terms of subordination and coordination. Further, the different frequency of adverbials and adjectivals between spoken and written language is also compared and analyzed. Keywords: spoken and written grammar, English, Vietnamese 138 1 Received: July 15, 2015 / Accepted: September 10, 2015 2 [email protected] No. 11 (July - December 2015) No. 11 (July - December 2015) CAO Resumen El principal objetivo de este artículo es describir y evaluar algunas diferencias entre la gramática oral y escrita del idioma inglés y comparar algunos aspectos gramaticales con el idioma vietnamita. Esta revisión muestra como la gramática oral es menos rígida que la gramática escrita. Por otra parte, se destaca la distinción entre el hablar y el escribir en términos de subordinación y coordinación. Además, la diferencia en el uso de adverbios y adjetivos entre la gramática oral y escrita también es comparada y analizada. Palabras clave: gramática oral y escrita, inglés, vietnamita Resumo O principal objetivo deste artigo é descrever e avaliar algumas diferenças entre a gramática oral e escrita do idioma inglês e comparar alguns aspectos gramaticais com o idioma vietnamita.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjective in Old English
    Adjective in Old English Adjective in Old English had five grammatical categories: three dependent grammatical categories, i.e forms of agreement of the adjective with the noun it modified – number, gender and case; definiteness – indefiniteness and degrees of comparison. Adjectives had three genders and two numbers. The category of case in adjectives differed from that of nouns: in addition to the four cases of nouns they had one more case, Instrumental. It was used when the adjective served as an attribute to a noun in the Dat. case expressing an instrumental meaning. Weak and Strong Declension Most adjectives in OE could be declined in two ways: according to the weak and to the strong declension. The formal differences between the declensions, as well as their origin, were similar to those of the noun declensions. The strong and weak declensions arose due to the use of several stem-forming suffixes in PG: vocalic a-, o-, u- and i- and consonantal n-. Accordingly, there developed sets of endings of the strong declension mainly coinciding with the endings of a-stems of nouns for adjectives in the Masc. and Neut. and of o-stems – in the Fem. Some endings in the strong declension of adjectives have no parallels in the noun paradigms; they are similar to the endings of pronouns: -um for Dat. sg, -ne for Acc. Sg Masc., [r] in some Fem. and pl endings. Therefore the strong declension of adjectives is sometimes called the ‘pronominal’ declension. As for the weak declension, it uses the same markers as n-stems of nouns except that in the Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comparing Pluralities Gregory Scontras
    Comparing Pluralities Gregory Scontras ([email protected]) Department of Linguistics, Harvard University Peter Graff ([email protected]) Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Noah D. Goodman ([email protected]) Department of Psychology, Stanford University Abstract What does it mean to compare sets of objects along a scale, for example by saying “the men are taller than the women”? We explore comparison of pluralities in two experiments, eliciting comparison judgments while varying the properties of the members of each set. We find that a plurality is judged as “bigger” when the mean size of its members is larger than the mean size of the competing plurality. These results are incompatible with previous accounts, in which plural comparison is inferred from many instances of singular comparison between the members of the sets (Matushansky and Ruys, 2006). Our results suggest the need for a type of predication that ascribes properties to plural entities, not just individuals, based on aggregate statistics of their members. More generally, these results support the idea that sets and their properties are actively represented as single units. 1 Keywords: Comparatives; plurality; set-based properties; natural language semantics; mental representations Word count: 3801 1. Introduction When we think and talk about groups of individuals—pluralities—do we represent the collection as a single entity with its own properties? For example, when we say “the red dots are big” is there an aggregate size for the group of red dots to which we refer? In this paper we investigate this question by studying plural comparison—e.g.
    [Show full text]