DOCSLIB.ORG

(Parangipettai Coast), Tamilnadu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Parangipettai Coast), Tamilnadu © 2017 IJRAR April 2017, Volume 4, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) COMMERCIALLY IMPORTANT ICHTHYOFAUNAL BIODIVERSITY OF ANNANKOVIL LANDING CENTRE (PARANGIPETTAI COAST), TAMILNADU R. RAJASEKARAN Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai – 608 502, Tamil Nadu ABSTRACT The coastline of Tamil Nadu has a length of about 1076 kms constitutes about 15% of the total coastal length of India and stretches along the Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea. The macrofaunal communities are probably the most diverse group on earth and soil represents a favorable habitat for macrofauna. Fishes have a variety of size, colors, attractive and behaviors in the aquatic ecosystem. Consumption is therefore increasing rapidly in many countries, but the importance of fish in daily diet is not yet fully realized. It is still a supplemental diet to a large section, mainly considered low weight of rich and delicious food items. The present investigation was carried out on marine fish accessibility along the Parangipettai coastal waters to identify and quantify. Stratified random sampling method was followed from each trawl and the collected fishes were identified up to species level by using the FAO identification sheet. A large collection of marine fish was made along the coastal line of Parangipettai and totally 15 species belonging to 14 families and 14 genera of marine fishes were identified over a 3 months study period from January 2016 to March 2016. Most of the species were commonly available in all the season along the Parangipettai coastal waters. The present study revealed the occurrence of commercially important marine fish species along the Annaankovil landing centre, Prangipettai , southeast coast of India. Keywords: Ichthyfauna, bycatch, trawl fishes, Parangipettai 1. INTRODUCTION million and there are about 1, 94,490 fishing crafts The fisheries sector plays an important role in operated in the country for harvesting marine fishery Indian economy and its contribution to the GDP is resources (CMFRI, 2010). Out of this about 72,500 about one percent. Export earnings from marine are mechanized crafts, 71,300 are motorized and the sector have increased from Rs. 3.92 crores in 1961- rest are non-mechanized. In mechanized sector there 62 to Rs. 12,901.47 crores in 2010-11 with 11.8% are about 35,200 trawlers. Fishing by all these crafts growth during 2009-10. There are 0.99 million active are concentrated in the depth zone up to 100 m. The fishermen employed directly and 0.61 million traditional crafts and motorized crafts are employed indirectly with the marine fisheries sector. concentrated more in the east coast (72% and 58%) The total fisher folk population in the country is 4.00 IJRAR19D1262 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 813 © 2017 IJRAR April 2017, Volume 4, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) where as the mechanized vessels are more along the India 2.8 million tons). The fishes landed daily were west coast (58%). marketed at the local fish market and in the India is a tropical country with multi-species surrounding villages and the choice items were moved fishery in the marine sector. Various types of fishing to interior places so also exported. The surplus is crafts and gears are used for fishing from the seas. sundried. As a wide range of fin fishes were The development of fisheries sector in India can be contributing in the catch, hence a checklist has been classified into three phases. Prior to 1965-66 is the made for the commercially important food fishes first phase when landings were mainly by non- occurring in the waters of Parangipettai (southeast mechanized indigenous crafts and gears and the coast of India). The present study is aimed at landings remained below one million tonnes during documenting the finfish diversity and stock assessment this phase. The second phase is the period upto 1985- along Parangipettai coast. 86 and the important features of this phase were 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE increased mechanization, improved gear materials, Assessment of finfishes in Indian waters has introduction of motorization of country crafts, been studied by only few researchers. Day (1989a) has expansion of export trade etc. The last phase is the described 1418 fish species under 342 genera from the period after 1986. This phase featured intensification British India. Talwar and sacker (1984a) described of mechanization, motorization of country crafts, 2546 fish species belonging to 969 genera, 254 multi-day voyage fishing etc. The average families and 40 orders, In India 2,782 species contribution from west coast is 67% and that from belonging to 973 genera, 246 families and 45 orders the east coast is 33%. are recorded. Fish forms a vital source of food and is man’s Manikandavelu (1996) recorded 222 coral reef important source of high quality protein, providing fishes in Gulf of Mannar, 76 falling under the marine 16% of the animal protein consumed by the world’s ornamental fish category. In a study at landing centres, population (FAO, 2000). Marine fisheries have trap sampling and scuba under water surveys, emerged as one of the largest industries in the Rajasegar and Sendhilkumar (2009) studied finfish country employing about 10 million people in 3,651 biodiversity in Karaikkal coast for a period of one year fishing villages along the 8,129 Km coastline of India from January to December 2003, and they recorded a earning foreign exchange of over 7250 crores in total of 196 species belonging to 18 orders, 87 families 2009-2010. and 134 genera. Naomi et al. (2006) investigated the Tamil Nadu has a coastline of about 1,076 Km trawlers operated in four centers at Kerala, which (13% of the country’s coastline), 1.9 lakh Km2 of recorded a total catch of 70,788 t, of which the finfish Exclusive Economic Zone (9% of India’s EEZ) and a resources constituted 81.6% (57,785 t). Similar type of continental shelf of about 41,412 Km2. Tamil Nadu survey carried out by Sujitha (2011) in fish diversity alone produced 363,000 tons of marine fish and 112,00 associated with coral reef patches around Netrani tons of inland fish amounting altogether to 475,000 Island, in Karnataka (South India) by visual census tons of total fish in the year 2008 (total for the whole method. A total of 69 species belonging to 39 genera, IJRAR19D1262 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 814 © 2017 IJRAR April 2017, Volume 4, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) 19 families and 3 orders were recorded in the transect km North of Cuddalore district. The study area is in four sites. Jitendrakumar et al. (2015) investigated located at the South - East coast of Bay of Bengal and ichthyofaunal diversity of Mangalore coast from the distance is 250 kms from Chennai. Parangipettai September-2012 to April-2013. Brahmane et al. (2014) enjoys tropical wet and dry climate, summer prevails reported the Ichthyofaunal diversity from four in the months of April and May while days in mid- different landing centers namely, Sikka bander, Bed May are the hottest (Agni) period during a year with (Rasulnagar), Bedibander and Vadinar located in the temperature regularly reaching 100°F. December and vicinity of Marine National Park (MNP), Jamnagar, January are winter months. Parangipettai receives Gujarat with the help of different fishing gears. average rainfall of 123.2 cm per annum most of the Rajaram and Murugan (2012) assessed the rainfall is received by the north-east monsoon. Ichthyofaunal diversity in the inshore waters around (b) Methodology the Great Nicobar Island. During this assessment 256 Samples (fishes) were collected from the species of finfishes belonging to 141 genera, 83 commercial fish landings at Annankovil of families and 18 orders were recorded. Parangipettai, during the January 2016 to March 2016. Though many works are available on finfish Later the specimens were examined the various biodiversity of various ecosystems of east coast of morphological characters for identification. The India but there is no detailed works has been carried specimens were examined in detail and identified out in Parangipettai coast. Hence an attempt has been following Day (1878), de Beaufort and Chapman made for the appraisal of finfish biodiversity of (1951), Munro (1955), Fischer and Bianchi (1984), Parangipettai coast. Ramaiyan et al. (1987) and Mohsin and Ambak (1996). For further studies specimens were preserved 3. MATERIALS & METHODS in 5% formalin after identification. Mechanized (a) Study area trawlers, mechanized boats, catamarans, plank-built Parangipettai (11°31′ 59.52″ N; 79°48′) is one boats and dugout canoes were mainly employed for among the major fish landing harbor in Tamil Nadu, fishing. Gill nets (35mm) and trawl nets (80cm-10cm) which is located 12 km South - East of Killai and 35 are commonly used gears in the study area. 4. RESULT SYSTEMATIC POSITION Kingdom : Animalia Phylum : Chordata 1. Rhinobatos granulutus Class : Chomdrichthyes Order : Rhinopritiformes Range in size from 50 – 280cm total length, Family : Rhinobatidae majority under 1 meter total length. Smallest listed Genus : Rhinobatos 34cm but thought to be juveniles, anteriorly flattened, elongate snout, stout tail, confluent with trunk, Species : R. granulates IJRAR19D1262 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 815 © 2017 IJRAR April 2017, Volume 4, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) pectoral fins expanded slightly& attached to head 3. Zebrias synapturoides (Jenkins, 1910) from nostrils to ½ the snout length. Relatively large Class : Actinoptergii dorsal fins which begin about mid-length of tail, Order : Pleuronectiformes Single-lobed pelvic fins only moderately expanded Family : Saleidae laterally, caudal fin not bilobed, often with dermal Genus : Zebrias denticles along dorsal midline.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sound Production by a Recoiling System in the Pempheridae and Terapontidae
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 00:00–00 (2016) Sound Production by a Recoiling System in the Pempheridae and Terapontidae Eric Parmentier,1* Michael L. Fine,2 and Hin-Kiu Mok3,4 1Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, AFFISH-RC, Institut de Chimie, Bat.^ B6c, Universitede Lie`ge, Lie`ge, B-4000, Belgium 2Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284-2012 3Department of Oceanography and Asia-Pacific Ocean Research Center, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan 4National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Checheng, Pingtung, 944, Taiwan ABSTRACT Sound-producing mechanisms in fishes several hundred Hz (Parmentier and Fine, 2016). are extraordinarily diversified. We report here original Two main types of mechanism have been analyzed. mechanisms of three species from two families: the (1) Sound can be produced as a forced response: pempherid Pempheris oualensis, and the terapontids the muscle contraction rate or time for a twitch Terapon jarbua and Pelates quadrilineatus.Allsonic mechanismsarebuiltonthesamestructures.Theros- determines sound fundamental frequency (Sko- tral part of the swimbladder is connected to a pair of glund, 1961; Connaughton, 2004; Fine et al., 2001; large sonic muscles from the head whereas the poste- Onuki and Somiya, 2004; Parmentier et al., 2011, rior part is fused with bony widenings of vertebral 2014). In various catfish species (Boyle et al., bodies. Two bladder regions are separated by a stretch- 2014, 2015), the sonic muscles originate on the able fenestra that allows forward extension of the ante- skull and insert on a bony modified rib (Mullerian€ rior bladder during muscle contraction. A recoiling ramus) that attaches to the swimbladder (Ladich apparatus runs between the inner face of the anterior and Bass, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. (Online Supplementary Material) Species, Gliding Strategies
    Appendix 1. (Online Supplementary Material) Species, gliding strategies, species distributions, geographic range sizes, habitat, and egg buoyancy characteristics used for concentrated changes tests. Species Gliding strategy Species distribution (reference #) Geographic range size Habitat (reference #) Egg buoyancy (reference #) Cheilopogon abei (Parin, 1996) 4 wings Indian, Indo-Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelagic (1) Buoyant (2) Cheilopogon atrisignis (Jenkins, 1903) 4 wings Indian, Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Buoyant (4) Cheilopogon cyanopterus (Valenciennes, 1847) 4 wings Atlantic, Indo-Pacific (2) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Non-Buoyant (5) Cheilopogon dorsomacula (Fowler, 1944) 4 wings Pacific (1) within 1 ocean basin holoepipelagic (1) Buoyant (2) Cheilopogon exsiliens (Linnaeus, 1771) 4 wings Atlantic (2) within 1 ocean basin holoepipelagic (3) Buoyant (2,5) Cheilopogon furcatus (Mitchill, 1815) 4 wings Atlantic, Indian, Pacific (6) 2 or more ocean basins holoepipelagic (3) Non-Buoyant (5) Cheilopogon melanurus (Valenciennes, 1847) 4 wings Atlantic (7) within 1 ocean basin meroepipelagic (7) Non-Buoyant (5,8) Cheilopogon pinnatibarbatus (californicus) (Cooper, 1863) 4 wings eastern tropical Pacific (9) within 1 ocean basin meroepipelgic (3) Non-Buoyant (10) Cheilopogon spilonotopterus (Bleeker, 1865) 4 wings Indian and Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Buoyant (4) Cheilopogon xenopterus (Gilbert, 1890) 4 wings eastern tropical Pacific (11) within 1 ocean basin
    [Show full text]
  • Dedication Donald Perrin De Sylva
    Dedication The Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Mangroves as Fish Habitat are dedicated to the memory of University of Miami Professors Samuel C. Snedaker and Donald Perrin de Sylva. Samuel C. Snedaker Donald Perrin de Sylva (1938–2005) (1929–2004) Professor Samuel Curry Snedaker Our longtime collaborator and dear passed away on March 21, 2005 in friend, University of Miami Professor Yakima, Washington, after an eminent Donald P. de Sylva, passed away in career on the faculty of the University Brooksville, Florida on January 28, of Florida and the University of Miami. 2004. Over the course of his diverse A world authority on mangrove eco- and productive career, he worked systems, he authored numerous books closely with mangrove expert and and publications on topics as diverse colleague Professor Samuel Snedaker as tropical ecology, global climate on relationships between mangrove change, and wetlands and fish communities. Don pollutants made major scientific contributions in marine to this area of research close to home organisms in south and sedi- Florida ments. One and as far of his most afield as enduring Southeast contributions Asia. He to marine sci- was the ences was the world’s publication leading authority on one of the most in 1974 of ecologically important inhabitants of “The ecology coastal mangrove habitats—the great of mangroves” (coauthored with Ariel barracuda. His 1963 book Systematics Lugo), a paper that set the high stan- and Life History of the Great Barracuda dard by which contemporary mangrove continues to be an essential reference ecology continues to be measured. for those interested in the taxonomy, Sam’s studies laid the scientific bases biology, and ecology of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Fish Diversity of Tamil Nadu, India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (10), October 2017, pp. 1968-1985 Estuarine fish diversity of Tamil Nadu, India H.S. Mogalekar*, J. Canciyal#, P. Jawahar, D.S. Patadiya, C. Sudhan, P. Pavinkumar, Prateek, S. Santhoshkumar & A. Subburaj Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College & Research Institute, (Tamil Nadu Fisheries University), Thoothukudi-628 008, India. #ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India. *[E-Mail: [email protected]] Received 04 February 2016 ; revised 10 August 2017 Systematic and updated checklist of estuarine fishes contains 330 species distributed under 205 genera, 95 families, 23 orders and two classes. The most diverse order was perciformes with 175 species, 100 genera and 43 families. The top four families with the highest number of species were gobidae (28 species), carangidae (23 species), engraulidae (15 species) and lutjanidae (14 species). Conservation status of all taxa includes one species as endangered, five species as vulnerable, 14 near threatened, 93 least concern and 16 data deficient. As numbers of commercial, sports, ornamental and cultivable fishes are high, commercial and recreational fishing could be organized. Seed production by selective breeding is recommended for aquaculture practices in estuarine areas of Tamil Nadu. [Keywords: Estuarine fishes, updated checklist, fishery and conservation status, Tamil Nadu] Introduction significant component of coastal ecosystem due to The total estuarine area of Tamil Nadu their immense biodiversity values in aquatic was estimated to be 56000 ha, which accounts ecology. The fish fauna inhabiting the estuarine 3.88 % of the total estuarine area of India 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SNO APP.No Name Contact Address Reason 1 AP-1 K
    SNO APP.No Name Contact Address Reason 1 AP-1 K. Pandeeswaran No.2/545, Then Colony, Vilampatti Post, Intercaste Marriage certificate not enclosed Sivakasi, Virudhunagar – 626 124 2 AP-2 P. Karthigai Selvi No.2/545, Then Colony, Vilampatti Post, Only one ID proof attached. Sivakasi, Virudhunagar – 626 124 3 AP-8 N. Esakkiappan No.37/45E, Nandhagopalapuram, Above age Thoothukudi – 628 002. 4 AP-25 M. Dinesh No.4/133, Kothamalai Road,Vadaku Only one ID proof attached. Street,Vadugam Post,Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal – 637 407. 5 AP-26 K. Venkatesh No.4/47, Kettupatti, Only one ID proof attached. Dokkupodhanahalli, Dharmapuri – 636 807. 6 AP-28 P. Manipandi 1stStreet, 24thWard, Self attestation not found in the enclosures Sivaji Nagar, and photo Theni – 625 531. 7 AP-49 K. Sobanbabu No.10/4, T.K.Garden, 3rdStreet, Korukkupet, Self attestation not found in the enclosures Chennai – 600 021. and photo 8 AP-58 S. Barkavi No.168, Sivaji Nagar, Veerampattinam, Community Certificate Wrongly enclosed Pondicherry – 605 007. 9 AP-60 V.A.Kishor Kumar No.19, Thilagar nagar, Ist st, Kaladipet, Only one ID proof attached. Thiruvottiyur, Chennai -600 019 10 AP-61 D.Anbalagan No.8/171, Church Street, Only one ID proof attached. Komathimuthupuram Post, Panaiyoor(via) Changarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli, 627 761. 11 AP-64 S. Arun kannan No. 15D, Poonga Nagar, Kaladipet, Only one ID proof attached. Thiruvottiyur, Ch – 600 019 12 AP-69 K. Lavanya Priyadharshini No, 35, A Block, Nochi Nagar, Mylapore, Only one ID proof attached. Chennai – 600 004 13 AP-70 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Planktivorous Fishes: Their Evolution, Feeding Behaviours, Selectivities, and Impacts
    Hydrobiologia 146: 97-167 (1987) 97 0 Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Netherlands A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts I Xavier Lazzaro ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement eri Coopération), 213, rue Lu Fayette, 75480 Paris Cedex IO, France Present address: Laboratorio de Limrzologia, Centro de Recursos Hidricob e Ecologia Aplicada, Departamento de Hidraulica e Sarzeamento, Universidade de São Paulo, AV,DI: Carlos Botelho, 1465, São Carlos, Sï? 13560, Brazil t’ Mail address: CI? 337, São Carlos, SI? 13560, Brazil Keywords: planktivorous fish, feeding behaviours, feeding selectivities, electivity indices, fish-plankton interactions, predator-prey models Mots clés: poissons planctophages, comportements alimentaires, sélectivités alimentaires, indices d’électivité, interactions poissons-pltpcton, modèles prédateurs-proies I Résumé La vision classique des limnologistes fut de considérer les interactions cntre les composants des écosystè- mes lacustres comme un flux d’influence unidirectionnel des sels nutritifs vers le phytoplancton, le zoo- plancton, et finalement les poissons, par l’intermédiaire de processus de contrôle successivement physiqucs, chimiques, puis biologiques (StraSkraba, 1967). L‘effet exercé par les poissons plaiictophages sur les commu- nautés zoo- et phytoplanctoniques ne fut reconnu qu’à partir des travaux de HrbáEek et al. (1961), HrbAEek (1962), Brooks & Dodson (1965), et StraSkraba (1965). Ces auteurs montrèrent (1) que dans les étangs et lacs en présence de poissons planctophages prédateurs visuels. les conimuiiautés‘zooplanctoniques étaient com- posées d’espèces de plus petites tailles que celles présentes dans les milieux dépourvus de planctophages et, (2) que les communautés zooplanctoniques résultantes, composées d’espèces de petites tailles, influençaient les communautés phytoplanctoniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre Matric Scholarship 2019-2020 - Fresh Sl
    Pre Matric Scholarship 2019-2020 - Fresh Sl. Name / Father Applicant Id Institute name Address Disb.Amt no Name BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 48 Nellukadai street Parangipettai 1 TN201920001530939 HUMAIRA /SHAALISHAHIB TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 Bhuvanagiri Taluk 1000 BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 2 TN201920002536672 FATHIMA /NAZRHUSSAIN TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 38, Kaziyar Street, Parangipettai. 1000 MOHAMED HAFEEL BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 8/1, JAIYEIBAVA STREET, 3 TN201920006709903 /MOHAMED BASHA TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 PARANGIPETTAI. 1000 BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 4 TN201920001097372 ADHNAN /Syed Musthafa TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 34 Vathiyapalli Street-Parangipettai 1000 MOHAMEDHASHIM BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 5 TN201920003629460 /Abdul Haleem TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 33-2 nd Street PK Road -Karaikal 1000 MOHAMED HAMADHA BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 20/47, KUTTAIYA CHETTY ST., 6 TN201920006429121 /MOHAMED BASHA TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 PARANGIPETTAI. 1000 BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 7 TN201920002592363 MANHA /Noor Sukkur Ali TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 No 21,Kajiyar Street-Parangipettai 1000 BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 8 TN201920001097647 ARFAN /Syed Musrhafa TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 34 Vathiyapalli Dtreet Parangipettai 1000 MOHAMED ASEED BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 9 TN201920001348752 /YOSUF ALI TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605 11/3,Kollankadai St., Parangipettai. 1000 MOHAMED HISHAAM A H BABA VIDALAYA N& P ( CUDDALORE - 10 TN201920003628594 /Abdul Haleem TAMIL NADU ) / 33181000605
    [Show full text]
  • The Red-Tailed Tropicbird on Kure Atoll
    THE RED-TAILED TROPICBIRD ON KURE ATOLL BY ROBERT R FLEET ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 16 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1974 THE RED-TAILED TROPICBIRD ON KURE ATOLL ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series,published by the American Ornithologists'Union, has been establishedfor major paperstoo long for inclusionin the Union's journal, The Auk. Publicationhas been made possiblethrough the generosityof Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation,Inc. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publicationin the seriesshotfid be addressedto the Editor, Dr. JohnWilliam Hardy, Florida StateMuseum, Universityof Florida, Gainesville,Florida 32611. Copies of OrnithologicalMonographs may be ordered from the Asst. Treasurerof the AOU, Glen E. Woolfenden,Dept. of Biology,University of SouthFlorida, Tampa, Florida 33620. OrnithologicalMonographs, No. 16, vi + 64 pp. Editor-in-chief, John William Hardy SpecialAssociate Editor for this issue: ThomasR. Howell Author's address:Department of Entomology,Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843. Issued December 26, 1974 Price $5.50 prepaid ($4.50 to AOU Members) Library of CongressCatalogue Card Number 74-32550 Printed by the Allen Press,Inc., Lawrence,Kansas 66044 Copyright ¸ by American Ornithologists'Union, 1974 THE RED-TAILED TROPICBIRD ON KURE ATOLL BY ROBERT R. FLEET ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 16 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 Locationand
    [Show full text]
  • Cuddalore District
    DISTRICT DIAGNOSTIC REPORT (DDR) Tamil Nadu Rural Transformation Project Cuddalore District 1 1 DDR - CUDDALORE 2 DDR - CUDDALORE Table of Contents S.No Contents Page No 1.0 Introduction 10 1.1 About Tamil Nadu Rural Transformation Project - TNRTP 1.2 About District Diagnostic Study – DDS 2.0 CUDDALORE DISTRICT 12 2.1 District Profile 3.0 Socio Demographic profile 14 3.1 Population 3.2 Sex Ratio 3.3 Literacy rate 3.4 Occupation 3.5 Community based institutions 3.6 Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) 4.0 District economic profile 21 4.1 Labour and Employment 4.2 Connectivity 5.0 GEOGRAPHIC PROFILE 25 5.1 Topography 5.2 Land Use Pattern of the District 5.3 Land types 5.4 Climate and Rainfall 5.5 Disaster Vulnerability 5.6 Soil 5.7 Water Resources 31 DDR - CUDDALORE S.No Contents Page No 6.0 STATUS OF GROUND WATER 32 7.0 FARM SECTOR 33 7.1 Land holding pattern 7.2 Irrigation 7.3 Cropping pattern and Major crops 7.4 Block wise (TNRTP) cropping area distribution 7.5 Prioritization of crops 7.6 Crop wise discussion 8.0 MARKETING AND STORAGE INFRASTRUCTURE 44 9.0 AGRIBUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES 46 10.0 NATIONAL AND STATE SCHEMES ON AGRICULTURE 48 11.0 RESOURCE INSTITUTIONS 49 12.0 ALLIED SECTORS 50 12.1 Animal Husbandry and Dairy development 12.2 Poultry 12.3 Fisheries 12.4 Sericulture 4 DDR - CUDDALORE S.No Contents Page No 13.0 NON-FARM SECTORS 55 13.1 Industrial scenario in the district 13.2 MSME clusters 13.3 Manufacturing 13.4 Service sectors 13.5 Tourism 14.0 SKILL GAPS 65 15.0 BANKING AND CREDIT 67 16.0 COMMODITY PRIORITISATION 69 SWOT ANALYSIS 72 CONCLUSION 73 ANNEXURE 76 51 DDR - CUDDALORE List of Tables Table Number and details Page No Table .1.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHES (C) Val Kells–November, 2019
    VAL KELLS Marine Science Illustration 4257 Ballards Mill Road - Free Union - VA - 22940 www.valkellsillustration.com [email protected] STOCK ILLUSTRATION LIST FRESHWATER and SALTWATER FISHES (c) Val Kells–November, 2019 Eastern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico: brackish and saltwater fishes Subject to change. New illustrations added weekly. Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus Deepwater chimaera, Hydrolagus affinis Atlantic spearnose chimaera, Rhinochimaera atlantica Nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum Whale shark, Rhincodon typus Sand tiger, Carcharias taurus Ragged-tooth shark, Odontaspis ferox Crocodile Shark, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus Bigeye thresher, Alopias superciliosus Basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus White shark, Carcharodon carcharias Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Longfin mako, Isurus paucus Porbeagle, Lamna nasus Freckled Shark, Scyliorhinus haeckelii Marbled catshark, Galeus arae Chain dogfish, Scyliorhinus retifer Smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis Smalleye Smoothhound, Mustelus higmani Dwarf Smoothhound, Mustelus minicanis Florida smoothhound, Mustelus norrisi Gulf Smoothhound, Mustelus sinusmexicanus Blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus Bignose shark, Carcharhinus altimus Narrowtooth Shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus Spinner shark, Carcharhinus brevipinna Silky shark, Carcharhinus faiformis Finetooth shark, Carcharhinus isodon Galapagos Shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis Bull shark, Carcharinus leucus Blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus Oceanic whitetip shark,
    [Show full text]