DOCSLIB.ORG

Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan 2017 MONCKS CORNER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 Planning Commission Adopted May 16, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2017 Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan was developed by a collaboration of the following: MONCKS CORNER PLANNING COMMISSION MONCKS CORNER TOWN COUNCIL Rev. Robin McGhee-Frazier (Co-Chair) Mayor Michael A. Lockliear Tobie Mixon (Co-Chair) David A. Dennis, Mayor Pro-Tem Mattie Gethers Johna T. Bilton Chris Griffin Charlotte A. Cruppeninck (PC Ex-officio member) Roscoe Haynes James N. Law Jr. Ryan Nelson Chadwick D. Sweatman Connor Salisbury Dr. Tonia A. Taylor Karyn Grooms (Alternate) TOWN STAFF Jeff Lord - Town Administrator Doug Polen - Community Development Director Marilyn Baker - Clerk Treasurer With assistance of the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................3 Community Vision ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Guiding Principles ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Opportunities and Challenges .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Population Goals and Policies ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Housing Goals and Policies ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Cultural Resource Goals and Policies ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Natural Resource Goals and Policies ...........................................................................................................................................7 Community Facilities Goals and Policies ...................................................................................................................................8 Transportation Goals and Policies ............................................................................................................................................10 Economic Goals and Policies .......................................................................................................................................................11 Land Use Goals and Policies ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Priority Investment ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Capital Improvement Projects .................................................................................................................................................... 17 Program Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 POPULATION ..............................................................................................................................................19 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................19 Population Trends .........................................................................................................................................................................19 Demographic Characteristics .................................................................................................................................................... 21 Households and Families ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Educational Attainment .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Income and Poverty .....................................................................................................................................................................24 Projected Population and Household Growth ......................................................................................................................26 Population Growth in the Surrounding Area ........................................................................................................................28 Projected Household Growth ....................................................................................................................................................28 Population Goals and Policies ...................................................................................................................................................29 HOUSING ...................................................................................................................................................30 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................30 Housing Stock ................................................................................................................................................................................30 Household Types ........................................................................................................................................................................... 32 2017 Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan Pg. i Future Housing Needs and Opportunities ..............................................................................................................................34 Housing Goals and Policies .........................................................................................................................................................35 CULTURAL RESOURCES ...........................................................................................................................36 Area History ...................................................................................................................................................................................36 Historic Structures and Sites ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 Cooper River Maritime Heritage Trails ....................................................................................................................................42 Religious Institutions ....................................................................................................................................................................42 Educational Institutions ..............................................................................................................................................................43 Libraries and Museums ...............................................................................................................................................................43 Recreational Facilities and Scenic Resources .........................................................................................................................43 Cultural Resource Goals and Policies .......................................................................................................................................44 NATURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................45 Climate ............................................................................................................................................................................................45 Endangered Species .....................................................................................................................................................................45 Wetlands ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Floodplains .....................................................................................................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986
    The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986 The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project Archaeology Underwater at Lewisfield Plantation, Berkeley County, SC By Carl Steen 1987 (Revised March 2018) 1987 (revised March 2018) 1 The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986 ABSTRACT In the fall of 1986 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology personnel conducted test excavations at the Two Cannon Wreck site (38BK856). This site is located offshore from Lewisfield Plantation, on the West Branch of the Cooper River near Moncks Corner in Berkeley County, South Carolina. A reminiscence of an action that occurred at Lewisfield Plantation in the American Revolution on July 16, 1781, was published in the nineteenth century. Based on this account, three divers found a sunken vessel and recovered two cannons of Revolutionary War vintage. Pursuant to the mandates of The South Carolina Underwater Antiquities Act of 1982, a long-term archaeological recovery plan was undertaken, the first phase of which involved limited testing and extensive archival research. A total of nine five-foot-square excavation units were opened along one side of the keel that revealed about twenty feet of the vessel. This testing revealed a burned vessel of indeterminate length and approximately fourteen feet abeam. Artifacts recovered from the test units date from the entire period of the occupation of Lewisfield Plantation. However, artifacts directly associated with the vessel, including melted glass and military items, date to the period of the American Revolution, supporting the contention that this vessel was burned and sunk during the Revolution. Extensive research into primary and secondary documents on the American Revolution in South Carolina has revealed nothing to corroborate the published reminiscence, or to clearly document (or deny) this, or any, action at Lewisfield.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places
    NFS Form 10-900 \/jfbMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) _ J^iJ . _ .___ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service flEC? National Register of Historic Places ' *""" ! Registration Form L_ __: ._'__;i: __ This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name __________Cooper River Historic District other names/site number 2. Location street & number Along the East and West branches of the Cooper River____ not for publication _ city or town Moncks Corner_____________________________ vicinity X state South Carolina code SC county Berkeley code 015 zip code 29461 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Randle, L.(2018). East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4962 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility By Lisa Briggitte Randle Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1979 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Leland Ferguson, Committee Member Michael E. Hodgson, Committee Member Kimberly Simmons, Committee Member Terrance Weik, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Lisa Briggitte Randle, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I am honored to dedicate this dissertation to my friend and mentor, Dr. Leland G. Ferguson, for initiating the East Branch of the Cooper River Project and for his wise words of support when the completion of this dissertation seemed overwhelming. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the University of South Carolina’s African American Professorial Program, the Anthropology Department’s Dorothy O’Dell Travel Grant, and a grant from the Archaeological Society of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 4-2012 Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report, April 2012". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm/3/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY SEVENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING __________ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Saturday, April 28, 2012 Mr. Kenneth L. Childs, President, Presiding __________ Reception and Exhibit ..............................................................11:00 a.m. South Caroliniana Library Luncheon.....................................................................................1:00 p.m. The Palmetto Club at The Summit Club Location Business Meeting Welcome Reports of the Executive Council...................... Mr. Kenneth L. Childs Address......................................................................Dr. William A. Link Richard J. Milbauer Chair in History, University
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Commission Draft Recommended 2/27/17 Introduction Background The basis of the comprehensive planning process is in the South Carolina Local Government Comprehensive Planning Enabling Act of 1994 (SC Code §6‐29‐310 through §6‐29‐1200), which repealed and replaced all existing state statutes authorizing municipal planning and zoning. The 1994 Act establishes the comprehensive plan as the essential first step of the planning process and mandates that the plan must be systematically evaluated and updated. Elements of the plan must be reevaluated at least once every five years, and the entire plan must be updated at least once every ten years. The Town of Moncks Corner is approximately 33 miles from downtown Charleston, South Carolina. Moncks Corner is the county seat of Berkeley County and is also part of the Charleston‐North Charleston Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). This MSA has experienced rapid growth over recent decades; from 2000 to 2010, the population swelled from 549,033 to 664,607, a 21.1% growth rate. As the Charleston region is growing rapidly, Moncks Corner has begun to experience significant population growth. According to the U.S. Census, the Town’s population grew from 7,885 to 9,873, from 2010 to 2015, which represents a 24.5% increase. Outside the Town, Berkeley County is poised to add to current growth in the Charleston MSA with the arrival of the Volvo manufacturing plant, expected to be completed in 2018. Other manufacturers, such as Audio‐Technica, an audio manufacturing company, have recently opened distribution centers in Moncks Corner. As of June 2016, Berkeley County has recruited $1.1 billion in new economic investments with more than 4,100 jobs announced in only 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Identity and Social Stratification in Hacienda La Esperanza, Manatí, Puerto Rico
    THE MATERIAL CULTURE OF SLAVERY: CONSUMER IDENTITY AND SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN HACIENDA LA ESPERANZA, MANATÍ, PUERTO RICO A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Paul F. Farnsworth, Advisory Chair, Department of Anthropology Anthony J. Ranere, Department of Anthropology Patricia Hansell, Department of Anthropology Theresa A. Singleton, External Member, University of Syracuse, Anthropology © Copyright 2018 by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the human experience during enslavement in nineteenth-century Puerto Rico, one of the last three localities to outlaw the institution of slavery in the Americas. It reviews the history of slavery and the plantation economy in the Caribbean and how the different European regimes regulated slavery in the region. It also provides a literature review on archaeological research carried out in plantation contexts throughout the Caribbean and their findings. The case study for this investigation was Hacienda La Esperanza, a nineteenth- century sugar plantation in the municipality of Manatí, on the north coast of the island. The history of the Manatí Region is also presented. La Esperanza housed one of the largest enslaved populations in Puerto Rico as documented by the slave census of 1870 which registered 152 slaves. The examination of the plantation was accomplished through the implementation of an interdisciplinary approach that combined archival research, field archaeology, anthropological interpretations of ‘material culture’, and geochemical analyses (phosphates, magnetic susceptibility, and organic matter content as determined by loss on ignition).
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Free: Abraham Lincoln's Journey to Emancipation," 2 March Through 15 April 2005
    Introduction How was it that a nation founded on ideals of freedom and equality was also, from its birth, home to slavery? The University Libraries of the University at Buffalo were proud to host the traveling exhibition "Forever Free: Abraham Lincoln's Journey to Emancipation," 2 March through 15 April 2005. By tracing Lincoln 's journey from an anti-slavery moderate to the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, this exhibit explores the events and ideas which gave birth to the Proclamation, which forever transformed our nation. The Emancipation Proclamation was the death blow to the "peculiar institution." Slavery was finally "That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand abolished as an American institution with the ratification of the eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in Thirteenth Amendment in December 1865. rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, Organized by the Huntington Library, San Marino, California, and including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, New York City, repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for in cooperation with the American Library Association (ALA), this their actual freedom." traveling exhibit was made possible through a major grant from Emancipation Proclamation, 1 January 1863 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH).
    [Show full text]
  • Tranquil Hill Plantation: the Most Charming Inland Place
    TRANQUIL HILL PLANTATION: THE MOST CHARMING INLAND PLACE CHICORA FOUNDATION RESEARCH SERIES 66 TRANQUIL HILL PLANTATION: THE MOST CHARMING INLAND PLACE Research Series 66 Michael Trinkley Debi Hacker With Contributions by: Linda Scott Cummings S. Homes Hogue Robert L. McCain Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 ▪ 861 Arbutus Drive Columbia, SC 29202-8664 803/787-6910 www.chicora.org February 2008 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Trinkley, Michael. Tranquil Hill Plantation : the most charming inland place / Michael Trinkley, Debi Hacker ; with contributions by Linda Scott Cummings, S. Homes Hogue, Robert L. McCain. p. cm. -- (Research series ; 66) Includes bibliographical references. Summary: "This study reports on data recovery excavations at archaeological site 38DR141, Tranquil Hill Plantation in Dorchester County, South Carolina. Investigations include excavation and mechanical stripping at the main house, the slave settlement, a domestic slave settlement to the east, and in the large gardens to the south"--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-58317-065-6 (alk. paper) 1. Tranquil Hill Plantation (S.C.)--Antiquities. 2. Excavations (Archaeology)--South Carolina-- Dorchester County. 3. Tranquil Hill Plantation (S.C.)--History. 4. Dwellings--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 5. Plantation life--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 6. Slaves--South Carolina--Dorchester County--Social life and customs. 7. Slavery--South Carolina--Dorchester County-- History. 8. Gardens, English--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 9. Dorchester County (S.C.)-- Antiquities. 10. Dorchester County (S.C.)--Social life and customs. I. Hacker, Debi. II. Title. F279.T69T75 2008 975.7'94--dc22 2008003614 © 2008 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transcribed in any form without permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Congress on the Historic Preservation of Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Sites in the United States (P.L
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Report to CoCongressngress oonn tthehe HiHistoricstoric PrPreservadoneservation ooff RRevolutionaryevolutionary War anandd War ooff 1812 SiSitestes in the UUnitednited StStatesates Prepared for The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate The Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives Prepared by American Battlefield Protection Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC September 2007 Front Cover Brandywine Battlefield (PA200), position of American forces along Brandywine Creek, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Photo by Chris Heisey. Authorities The Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Historic The American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996, as Preservation Study Act of 1996 amended (P.L. 104-333, Sec. 604; 16 USC 469k). (P.L. 104-333, Section 603; 16 USC 1a-5 Notes). Congress authorized the American Battlefield Protection Congress, concerned that “the historical integrity of Program of the National Park Service to assist citizens, many Revolutionary War sites and War of 1812 sites is at public and private institutions, and governments at all risk,” enacted legislation calling for a study of historic levels in planning, interpreting, and protecting sites where sites associated with the two early American wars. The historic battles were fought on American soil during the purpose of the study was to: “identify Revolutionary War armed conflicts that shaped the growth and development sites and War of 1812 sites, including sites within units of the United States, in order that present and future of the National Park System in existence on the date of generations may learn and gain inspiration from the enactment of this Act [November 12, 1996]; determine the ground where Americans made their ultimate sacrifice.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing the Plantation House: Preservation Critique in Southern Literature
    WEBB, CYNTHIA MONTGOMERY, Ph.D. Reframing the Plantation House: Preservation Critique in Southern Literature. (2015) Directed by Dr. Scott Romine. 238 pp. This dissertation contextualizes southern narrative critiques of plantation house preservation through the historic preservation movement, from its precursory development in the 1930s through today. Examining literary representations of plantation houses as historic relics in the contemporary moment, I demonstrate how a range of twentieth- and twenty-first century southern writers critique or challenge its architectural preservation. The southern plantation house has been coded in American popular culture as an exemplar of architectural heritage and a symbol of southern history, both of which beckon its preservation. Various modes of preservation, from nineteenth-century plantation fiction’s reminiscence of family homes and heroes to twenty-first century’s thriving tourism industry, figure the plantation owner’s house in romanticized ways that celebrate its architectural aesthetics, present its history through a narrow register of racial relations, and promote its nostalgic embrace. I argue that against prevailing tendencies toward various uncritical ethos of preservation, William Faulkner, Walker Percy, Alice Randall, Attica Locke, Allan Gurganus, and Godfrey Cheshire reframe the plantation house within complex historical and cultural contexts that counter the developing historic preservation movement’s popular following by illuminating the mythologies undergirding the iconic white-columned architecture and their perpetuation through its preservation. Through an interdisciplinary approach, Reframing the Plantation House combines architectural history, historic preservation, and a significant level of textual literary analysis to reveal counter-narratives that unsettle an assumed historical integrity and cultural significance associated with extant plantation houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Within the House of Bondage: Constructing and Negotiating the Plantation Landscape in the British Atlantic World, 1670-1820 Erin M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholar Commons - Institutional Repository of the University of South Carolina University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 Within the House of Bondage: Constructing and Negotiating the Plantation Landscape in the British Atlantic World, 1670-1820 Erin M. Holmes University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Holmes, E. M.(2017). Within the House of Bondage: Constructing and Negotiating the Plantation Landscape in the British Atlantic World, 1670-1820. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4225 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WITHIN THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE: CONSTRUCTING AND NEGOTIATING THE PLANTATION LANDSCAPE IN THE BRITISH ATLANTIC WORLD, 1670-1820 by Erin M. Holmes Bachelor of Arts The College of William and Mary, 2011 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Woody Holton, Major Professor Lydia M. Brandt, Committee Member Mark M. Smith, Committee Member Matt D. Childs, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Erin M. Holmes, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot remember a time when I did not love history, but a love of history does not make one a historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Pinckney National Historic Site
    CHARLES PINCKNEY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY August 2000 Robert W. Blythe Emily Kleine Steven H. Moffson Cultural Resources Stewardship Southeast Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Atlanta, Georgia ii On the cover: Archeological Dig at Charles Pinckney National Historic Site, 1996. Photo courtesy of the Southeast Archeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. iii Foreword We are pleased to make available this historic resource study, as part of our ongoing effort to provide comprehensive documentation for the historic structures and landscapes of National Park Service units in the Southeast Region. Following a field survey of park resources and extensive research, the project team updated the park’s List of Classified Structures, developed historic contexts, and prepared new National Register of Historic Places documentation. Many individuals and institutions contributed to the successful completion of this work. We would particularly like to thank Charles Pinckney National Historic Site Superintendent John Tucker and his staff, and Southeast Archeological Center Chief Archeologist Bennie Keel for their assistance. This study was made possible through a cooperative agreement with the Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation. Kirk A. Cordell Chief, Cultural Resources Stewardship Southeast Regional Office August 2000 v Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF CHARLES PINCKNEY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, 1754-1816 19 CHAPTER TWO: THE LOW COUNTRY COASTAL COTTAGE AND SNEE FARM, 1828 - 1941 43 CHAPTER THREE: MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 53 A PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PINCKNEY WRITINGS 57 SOURCES CONSULTED 59 APPENDIX A, HISTORICAL BASE MAP A-1 vi Figure Credits Fig. 1, National Park Service; Fig. 2, Philipse Manor Hall State Historic Site, New York; Fig.
    [Show full text]