DOCSLIB.ORG

F:\D\D-304 Cappelli

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F:\D\D-304 Cappelli DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LeCount Square New Rochelle, New York Lead Agency: City Council City of New Rochelle 515 North Avenue New Rochelle, NY 10801 Contact: Craig King, Commissioner of Development Telephone: 914-654-2182 Fax: 914-632-3626 Applicant: New Rochelle Revitalization, LLC 115 Stevens Avenue Valhalla, NY 10595 Contact: Joe Apicella Telephone: 914-769-6500 Fax: 914-769-2179 Submittal: April 27, 2006 Date of Acceptance: May 11, 2006 Date of Public Hearing: June 20, 2006 Closing Date of Comment Period: 10 days after close of public hearing PARTICIPATING CONSULTANTS DEIS Coordination and Report Preparation: Saccardi & Schiff, Inc. 445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 404 White Plains, New York 10601 phone: 914-761-3582 fax: 914-761-3759 Contacts: David Schiff Owen Wells Site Planning and Architecture: Design Development, PLLC 31 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 803 phone: 914-949-4110 fax: 914-949-4210 Contact: Mark Schulman Legal Services: DelBello, Donnellan, Weingarten, Tartaglia, Wise and Wiederkehr, LLP One North Lexington Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 phone: 914-681-0200 fax: 914-684-0288 Contact: Peter Wise, Esq. Environmental Assessment JM Associates, Inc. 225 Railroad Avenue Bedford Hills, NY 10507 phone: 914-241-3795 fax: 914-241-4499 Contact: John Manfredi Traffic Engineering: Adler Consulting 235 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601 phone: 914-997-8510 fax: 914-997-7140 Contact: Bernie Adler Site Engineering: Kellard Engineering & Consulting, PC 50 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 phone: 914-273-2323 fax: 914-272-2329 Contact: Dan Holt, P.E. Air Quality/Noise Studies: STV Incorporated 225 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003 phone: 212-777-4400 fax: 777-8463 Contacts: Molly MacQueen Douglas Swann Cultural Resources: Historical Perspectives, Inc. PO Box 3037 Westport, CT 06880 phone: 203-226-7654 fax: 203-226-8376 Contact: Julie Abell Horn LECOUNT SQUARE DEIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................. I-1 A. Proposed Action ................................................. I-1 B. Involved Agencies and Required Approvals/Permits .................... I-2 C. Summary of Significant Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures ....... I-3 D. Summary of Alternatives.......................................... I-5 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION.............................. II-1 A. Project Overview............................................... II-1 B. Involved Agencies and Required Approvals .......................... II-2 C. Interested Parties ............................................... II-4 D. Project Location and Setting ...................................... II-4 E. Project Description and Layout .................................... II-6 F. Project History................................................ II-13 G. Construction and Operation...................................... II-13 H. Project Purpose, Need and Benefits................................ II-16 III. IMPACT ISSUES ................................................... III-1 A. Land Use, Zoning and Planning Consistency .......................III-A-1 1. Land Use .............................................III-A-1 a. Existing Conditions...............................III-A-1 b. Potential Impacts.................................III-A-3 c. Mitigation Measures ..............................III-A-5 2. Consistency with Land Use Plans and Policies ...............III-A-5 3. Zoning ..............................................III-A-12 a. Existing Conditions..............................III-A-12 b. Potential Impacts................................III-A-13 c. Mitigation Measures .............................III-A-16 B. Utilities ..................................................... III-B-1 1. Water Service.......................................... III-B-1 a Existing Conditions............................... III-B-1 b. Potential Impacts................................. III-B-1 c. Mitigation Measures .............................. III-B-4 2. Sewage Disposal ....................................... III-B-4 a. Existing Conditions............................... III-B-4 b. Potential Impacts................................. III-B-5 c. Mitigation Measures .............................. III-B-8 3. Stormwater Management................................. III-B-8 a. Existing Conditions............................... III-B-8 b. Potential Impacts................................. III-B-8 c. Mitigation Measures .............................. III-B-9 4. Gas Service .......................................... III-B-11 a. Existing Conditions.............................. III-B-11 b. Potential Impacts................................ III-B-11 c. Mitigation Measures ............................. III-B-11 5. Electrical Service...................................... III-B-11 a. Existing Conditions.............................. III-B-11 b. Potential Impacts................................ III-B-11 c. Mitigation Measures ............................. III-B-12 C. Visual/Aesthetics/Urban Design ................................. III-C-1 1. Existing Conditions..................................... III-C-1 2. Potential Impacts....................................... III-C-2 3. Mitigation Measures .................................... III-C-4 D. Traffic .....................................................III-D-1 1. Existing Conditions.....................................III-D-1 2. Potential Impacts......................................III-D-25 3. Mitigation Measures ...................................III-D-38 E. Noise ...................................................... III-E-1 1. Existing Conditions..................................... III-E-1 2. Potential Impacts....................................... III-E-6 3. Mitigation Measures ................................... III-E-15 F. Air Quality .................................................. III-F-1 1. Existing Conditions..................................... III-F-1 2. Potential Impacts....................................... III-F-6 3. Mitigation Measures ................................... III-F-17 G. Socioeconomic ...............................................III-G-1 1. Existing Conditions.....................................III-G-1 2. Potential Impacts.......................................III-G-3 3. Mitigation Measures ....................................III-G-7 H. Community Facilities and Services ...............................III-H-1 1. Police, Fire and Emergency Services .......................III-H-1 a. Existing Conditions...............................III-H-1 b. Potential Impacts.................................III-H-1 c. Mitigation Measures ..............................III-H-3 2. Solid Waste ...........................................III-H-4 a. Existing Conditions...............................III-H-4 b. Potential Impacts.................................III-H-4 c. Mitigation Measures ..............................III-H-5 3. Schools ...............................................III-H-5 a. Existing Conditions...............................III-H-5 b. Potential Impacts.................................III-H-6 c. Mitigation Measures ..............................III-H-7 4. Open Space ...........................................III-H-7 a. Existing Conditions...............................III-H-7 b. Potential Impacts.................................III-H-7 c. Mitigation Measures ..............................III-H-8 I. Historic and Archaeological Resources............................ III-I-1 1. Existing Conditions..................................... III-I-1 2. Potential Impacts....................................... III-I-3 3. Mitigation Measures .................................... III-I-4 J. Phase I Environmental Assessment............................... III-J-1 1. Existing Conditions..................................... III-J-1 2. Potential Impacts....................................... III-J-1 3. Mitigation Measures .................................... III-J-2 K. Construction Impacts..........................................III-K-1 1. Potential Impacts.......................................III-K-1 2. Mitigation Measures ....................................III-K-5 IV. ALTERNATIVES ...................................................IV-1 A. No Build......................................................IV-1 B Development Under Existing Zoning ...............................IV-3 1. Of Each of the Subject Parcels Separately......................IV-3 2. As an Assemblage of All of the Subject Parcels.................IV-8 C. Development Maintaining the Ratio of Uses Outlined in the MOU, but with Post Office Retaining All Its Functions and Air Rights .....................IV-9 D. Development Maintaining the Building Program without Use of Subterranean Rights below Anderson Street. .........................................IV-14 E. Expanded 895,000 sf Development Incorporating Land Area within the Roadbeds of Lecount Place and Anderson Street ..............................IV-16 V. ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED ................... V-1 VI. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES ....................................................VI-1 VII. USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY ............................ VII-1 VIII. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS ................................... VIII-1 List of Exhibits After Page 1. Regional Location .................................................... II-5 2. Site Location ........................................................ II-5 3. Existing Site Conditions ..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 12, 2019 1
    Committee of the Whole Session, Tuesday, November 12, 2019 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1ST FLOOR COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SESSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2019 3:45 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PRESENTATION BUDGET SESSIONS/DISCUSSIONS - Tuesday, November 12, 2019, at 3:45 P. M., at start of the Committee of the Whole Session AGENDA REVIEW COMMENDATION(S): PUBLIC HEARING(S) THIS EVENING 1. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331, ZONING, ZONING MAP RE: THE WATER VIEW OVERLAY ZONE - Ordinance amending Chapter 331, Zoning, Zoning Map, relative to the Water View Overlay Zone (Rev.) Intro. 9/17/19; 10/7/19 Public Hearing adjourned to 11/12/19 2. PETITION BY YOUTH STUDY BASKETBALL, LLC, RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331, ZONING CODE, ZONING MAP - BLOCK 1490, LOTS 9 (PARTIAL) and 77, FROM NB-NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, TO NB-2.0, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS - Ordinance approving the petition of Youth Study Basketball, LLC (“Petitioner”) and amending the New Rochelle Zoning map to rezone the parcels identified as Section 5, Block 1490, Lots 9 (partial) and 77, from NB-Neighborhood Business to NB-2.0-Neighborhood Business 2.0, forming part of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle. (Intro. 10/7/19) 3. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONE THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO - Resolution amending Resolution No. 186 of 2016 adopting the amended findings statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) relative to the adoption of the Downtown Overlay Zone. (Intro. 10/7/19) Committee of the Whole Session, Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • City of New Rochelle, New York Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK CO MPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended December 31, 2012 CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended December 31,2012 Prepared by ,he Department of Finance I-Ioward Rattner Commissioner City of New Rochelle, New York Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended December 31,2012 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION I Principal Officials i Organization Chart ii Letter of Transmittal iii Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ix FINANCIAL SECTION I Independent Auditors' Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3 Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 18 Statement of Activities 19 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 21 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Assets 23 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 24 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 26 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund 27 Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 30 Statement of Cash Flows 32 Statement of Assets and Liabilities - Fiduciary Fund 34 Notes to Financial Statements 35 Required Supplementary Information - Other Post Employment Benefits- Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • MON-C-12607 Media Guide
    www.monroecollegemustangs.com MONROE COLLEGE MUSTANGS QUICK FACTS about the monroe mustangs The Monroe College Athletic Department fields teams in fourteen sports: baseball, men's Campus Locations basketball, women's basketball, men’s and women’s cross country, men's and women’s soccer, Bronx, NY football, softball, men’s and women’s indoor and outdoor track and field, and women's volleyball. New Rochelle, NY All Monroe teams are members of the National Junior College Athletic Association and Castries, St. Lucia participate in NJCAA Region XV. Monroe Mustangs men’s basketball, football, men’s and Founded: 1933 women’s soccer, and baseball and women’s volleyball are Division I programs as are all of the track Enrollment: 7,250 and field and cross country teams. Monroe women’s basketball and softball compete in Division II. President BASEBALL: Launched in 2005, Mustang baseball has established itself as a powerhouse. In 2006, they played in the playoffs Stephen J. Jerome in just their second season and in 2007 they advanced to the first round of the Region XV playoffs. 2008 was a turning point Athletic Director as they finished third in the Regional tournament winning the first of their two consecutive Region XV championships. Bert Shillingford Mustangs have gone on to play in Division I and II, as well as the ACBL, an elite summer league. Monroe baseball players come Sports Development and from the Caribbean, Canada, and elsewhere. There is also a strong local contingent. Former Monroe players have gone on to Information play in the NCAA and signed with Major League teams: the Oakland A’s, Toronto Blue Jays, The LA Dodgers, and Arizona Gary Axelbank Diamondbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Special City 325Th Anniversary Float Highlights Thanksgiving Parade Thanksgiving Highlights Float Anniversary 325Th City Special
    Pancakes and a Parade: The Tradition Continues The History of the Jews in 9 New Rochelle Chronicled 15 com December 2013 -- Volume 9 -- Issue 12 Complimentary Special City 325th Anniversary Float Highlights Thanksgiving Parade By Stephen E. Lipken A special float, commemorating the 325th An- niversary of the City of New Rochelle highlighted the November 23 Valenti-New Rochelle Thanksgiving Parade. The Grand Marshal was Domenic Procopio, Chairman of New Rochelle’s Civil Service Commission But that was only a small part of the floats, bands, antique vehicles and new to the parade, Peruvian Dancers, demonstrating the rich cultural heritage of New Rochelle. Iona College fielded a huge “Mayflow- er” display, running on bulldozer treads and sounding a horn reminiscent of a diesel locomotive whistle, as well as a giant inflatable “Killian the Gael” mascot on a float incorporating all Iona athletic teams plus the college’s renowned Bagpipe Band. Monroe College presented an elaborate float with the Statue of Liberty and two bright blue “Mustang” mascots. Chamber of Commerce featured a giant turkey; “Boss Tone” and “Sass Transit” (roller derby names) from Suburbia Roller Derby sported helmets with Chanukah dreidels and royal blue menorah. Some marchers promoted social awareness and responsibility, such as New Rochelle Humane Society, Salvation Army, American Red Cross and drum corps from Habitat for Humanity. Clowns joined the festivities, as well as midget fire truck, “Little Squirt, Engine Company 273.” Before the parade, a Pancake Breakfast was served in New Rochelle High School cafeteria. Seen outside the cafeteria was New Rochelle Fund for Educational Excellence, (www.nredfund.org) supporting projects that school budget cannot fund, from kindergarten to 12th grade.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester County and New Rochelle Background
    5. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS New Rochelle’s location on Westchester’s Long Island Sound shore places it within one of the state’s wealthiest counties. According to 1995 estimates from the United States Census Bureau, Westchester has New York’s fourth- highest median income, at $53,043. Only Putnam, Nassau, and Rockland, also New York City suburbs, and all much smaller in size than Westchester’s 443 square miles, has a greater median income. 5.1.1 WESTCHESTER COUNTY: HISTORY As shown in the map at left, Westchester County borders, on its south, the New York City borough of the Bronx. According to historian Frank E. Sanchis, this location at New York City’s doorstep has “always put it in the center of activity relative to the balance of the nation.” Indeed, Westchester’s development has historically been fueled by its proximity to what has been, since 1820, America’s largest city. Before the days of railroads or highways, Westchester had the trade routes of the Hudson River and Long Island Sound. In the 18th century, the primitive post roads to Albany and Boston were cut through Westchester’s rolling, wooded hills. When New York City’s population boomed after the 1825 completion of the Erie Canal, Westchester furnished many of the city’s raw and finished goods. Iron foundries were located throughout the county, and Westchester’s numerous brickyards and marble quarries provided the materials for the thousands of row houses and monumental new institutional buildings spreading across Manhattan. When Newgate Prison in Greenwich Village was no longer adequate, it was replaced in 1828 by Sing Sing, “up the river” in Westchester County.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood
    A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2001 1 Contents 1. Contents 2 2. Executive Summary 4 3. Introduction 6 4. Acknowledgements 8 5. Background Information and Existing Conditions 9 5.1Westchester Background 5.1.1 History of Westchester 9 5.1.2 Business, Industry and Land Use 11 5.2 New Rochelle Background 5.2.1 History of New Rochelle 14 5.2.2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Profilbe 16 5.2.3 New Rochelle: Business, Revenues, and Revenue Constraints 19 5.2.4 Economic Development 22 5.2.5 Land Use 24 5.2.6 Housing 25 5.2.7 Schools 26 5.3 City Park Background 5.3.1 History of City Park 27 5.3.2 Neighborhood Character 31 5.3.3 Land Use and Zoning 33 5.3.4 Business and Industry 36 5.3.5 MacLeay Apartments 37 5.3.6 Environmental Assessment 38 5.4 IKEA 43 5.4.1 Big Box Retail 47 6. Findings and Recommendations 6.1 Argument for Light Industry 48 6.1.1 Social Capital 49 6.1.2 State and Federal Aid 50 6.1.3 Locational Advantages 50 6.1.4 Demand for Industrial Space in Westchester 50 6.1.5 Industry Foci 52 6.1.6 Long Range Impact of Reinforcing Light Industry : 53 Input-Output Analysis of Development Impacts on Study Area 6.2 Zoning and Infrastructure Recommendation 57 6.2.1 Infrastructure Improvements 57 6.2.2 Zoning and Design Recommendations 62 6.3 Local Development Corporation 6.3.1 Mission, Goals and Function 65 2 6.3.2 Details about Formation 65 6.3.3 Potential Funding Sources 67 6.3.4 Land Acquisition 68 6.3.5 Benefits of the Local Development Corporation 68 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Go New Ro Students Work with the Garden Club to Move the World Continued from Page 1 During the Afternoon of June 27Th New in Mt
    Fleur-de-Lis Sculptures to Decorate Downtown Schneiderman Holds Community 8 Forum at Riverfront Library 15 com August 2013 -- Volume 9 -- Issue 8 Complimentary Community Voices Adamant Objections to Forest City’s Echo Bay FEIS By Stephen E. Lipken building along the Echo a city crying out for retail stores and a park of a Master Plan.” Bay waterfront and that no one will use.” However, kayaker Steven Meisner sup- New Rochelle City East Main Street, con- “We hoped for a fantastic plan…Now ported Forest City’s waterfront plans and Council Chambers was taining 285 residential all we have is a…mediocre housing proj- downtown investments. filled to near capacity as units and 25,000 feet ect…There is a lack of retail, housing, park- In a rare unanimous negative vote, many community mem- of commercial retail ing, office space, no real reason for anyone Council vetoed Capriccio Latino’s request bers voiced emotional space. Many residents to come and enjoy this area,” resident Beth for Special Cabaret Permit at the Tuesday, and vociferous objec- perceived the commer- Acocella stressed. July 16 Regular Legislative Meeting, aver- tions, often punctuated cial retail space as being Former New Rochelle Mayor Leonard ring inadequate parking plans, hours of by thunderous applause inadequate. Paduano, 82 decried “spot zoning,” alter- operation and location in a Neighborhood to Forest City’s Echo Westchester Coun- ing zoning to accommodate developers. Business Zone. Bay Final Environmental ty Legislator Jim Mai- “It is unconstitutional. It should be part Impact Statement (FEIS) sano stated, “So all this at a special meeting on proposal now is: rental Tuesday, July 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural
    MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Environmental Assessment Supplemental Section 106 Review for the Expansion of New Rochelle Yard on the Metro North New Haven Line New Rochelle, Westchester County, NY MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Westchester, Queens & Bronx Counties, New York August 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Lynn Drobbin & Associates and WSP MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Contents 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. CONSULTING PARTIES AND RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ...................................................................4 2.1 CONSULTING PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT .................................................................................................................6 3.1 DEFINITION OF THE PSA PROJECT AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT................................................................................... 6 3.2 DEFINITION OF THE APE FOR EXPANSION OF THE NEW ROCHELLE YARD ON
    [Show full text]
  • Newrochelle.Com
    ROCHELLE eChanging W CITY OF NE &!#%/& ASPECIAL New SUPPLEMENTTO WESTCHESTER Rochelle COMMERCEMAGAZINE $*5:0'/&830$)&--& /&8:03, The Changing Face of New Rochelle #X+NGM+NQC@M The fortunes of the Queen Q There are a number of major projects We are approaching that in a num- that have broken ground of late and oth- ber of ways. We have increased the mini- City along Long Island ers in the pipeline. What is your view on mum lot size in many neighborhoods for the developments taking place in the city? new development. We’ve acquired and Sound are definitely chang- protected open space. We are investing in MAYORBRAMSON New Rochelle is our recreational assets and we are focus- ing. The city’s turn-around making very exciting progress today. We ing more intently on environmental con- are experiencing the most dramatic trans- servation and protection. began in earnest during the formation in our modern history and I believe that the progress under way today QIs the new development fostering administration of Mayor will result in a city that is more vibrant investment by existing property owners in economically and more cosmopolitan the downtown district? Timothy Idoni in the late culturally. I think it is essential that we maintain the momentum with respect to MAYORBRAMSON 1990s. It is gathering steam well-planned economic development in New Rochelle is approach- our downtown core. At the same time we ing a tipping point. The under the current admin- recognize that there are many things we large-scale development is achieving a sufficient critical istration of Mayor Noam must do in order to ensure that the devel- opment results in a higher quality of life mass to begin breathing new Bramson.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND In response to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA Hazard Mitigation 2000), the City of New Rochelle, New York has developed this Multi-Hazard is any sustained Mitigation Plan (HMP or Plan). DMA 2000 amends the Stafford Act and is action taken to reduce or eliminate designed to improve planning for, response to, and recovery from, disasters by the long term risk and requiring state and local entities to implement pre-disaster mitigation planning effects that can result and develop HMPs. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has from specific issued guidelines for HMPs. The New York State Emergency Management hazards. Office (NYSEMO) also supports plan development for jurisdictions in the State FEMA defines a of New York. Hazard Mitigation Plan as Specifically, DMA 2000 requires that states with support from local the documentation of governmental agencies develop HMPs to prepare for and reduce the potential a state or local government impacts of natural hazards. DMA 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation evaluation of natural between state and local authorities, prompting them to work together. This hazards and the enhanced planning will better enable local and state governments to articulate strategies to mitigate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in faster allocation of funding and more such hazards. effective risk reduction projects. DMA 2000 ORIGINS -THE ROBERT T. STAFFORD DISASTER RELIEF AND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ACT In the early 1990s a new federal policy regarding disasters began to evolve. The Federal Rather than simply reacting whenever disasters strike communities, the federal Emergency government would encourage communities to first assess their vulnerability to Management various disasters and then take actions to reduce or eliminate potential risks.
    [Show full text]
  • New Rochelle Review
    november 2019 vol. 15, no. 11 newrochellereview.com shorelinepub.com SEE THE NEW Review HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE INSERT!! New Rochelle Great Day for MBKNewRo’s First Books & Basketball Event On Saturday, September our storied basketball courts at 21st, My Brother’s Keeper New Lincoln Park is part of an ambi- Rochelle hosted its first Books & tious $10 million revitalization Basketball event at Lincoln Park of the Lincoln Avenue Corridor,” at the outside basketball courts notes Rice. on Lincoln and Prince streets. In April 2015, New Rochelle New Rochelle boys and girls in became the first community in grades three through eight par- Westchester to implement Presi- ticipated in the clinics and tuto- dent Obama’s My Brother’s Keep- rials conducted by area coaches er initiative, which is designed to and student athletes from New lift all children and young adults, Rochelle High School. Each par- particularly boys and young men ticipant received a free book from of color. Today more than 250 Scholastic to start the school year cities and towns across the coun- off right and a drawstring bag de- great to be an athlete but you MBKNewRo. try have joined the My Brother’s signed by BA Lifesport. have to focus on reading and aca- “The Lincoln Towers HDFC Keeper initiative, with the hope “What a great day we had demincs too,” says Councilman is proud to be a continued sup- of closing opportunity gaps adults from birth to age 24. Rochelle (MBKNewRo) is a and the message was clear: It’s Jared Rice, who is the Chair of porter of MBKNewRo,” notes for babies, children and young My Brother’s Keeper New unique partnership between spokesperson Kenneth Plum- the City of New Rochelle and the mer.
    [Show full text]