DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Environmental Assessment Supplemental Section 106 Review for the Expansion of New Rochelle Yard on the Metro North New Haven Line New Rochelle, Westchester County, NY MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Westchester, Queens & Bronx Counties, New York August 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Lynn Drobbin & Associates and WSP MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Contents 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. CONSULTING PARTIES AND RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ...................................................................4 2.1 CONSULTING PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT .................................................................................................................6 3.1 DEFINITION OF THE PSA PROJECT AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT................................................................................... 6 3.2 DEFINITION OF THE APE FOR EXPANSION OF THE NEW ROCHELLE YARD ON THE METRO NORTH NEW HAVEN LINE ............... 8 4. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 23 5. RESOURCES IN THE APE ..................................................................................................................... 24 5.1 BACKGROUND HISTORY .................................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 LISTED AND ELIGIBLE HISTORIC RESOURCES NEAR THE APE ................................................................................... 26 5.3 LISTED AND ELIGIBLE HISTORIC RESOURCES IN THE APE ........................................................................................ 27 5.4 RESOURCES IN THE APE ................................................................................................................................... 28 5.5 DESCRIPTION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF RESOURCES OVER 50 YEARS OLD ..................................................................... 31 5.6 DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCES IN THE APE UNDER 50 YEARS OLD ............................................................................ 42 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... 51 7. EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................... 54 7.1 APPLICATION OF THE CRITERIA OF EFFECT............................................................................................................. 54 7.2 ASSESSING EFFECTS ........................................................................................................................................ 54 7.3 ADVERSE EFFECT CRITERIA ................................................................................................................................ 54 7.4 EFFECTS ON HISTORIC RESOURCES IN THE APE .................................................................................................... 55 8. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................................... 56 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................... 57 FIGURES Figure 1: Penn Station Access Project and New Rochelle Yard Area of Potential Effect Figure 2: Historic Resource APE: Expansion of New Rochelle Yard on Metro North New Haven Line Figure 3: Tax Map of APE: Expansion of New Rochelle Yard on Metro North New Haven Line Figure 4: DeRaffele Dining Car Manufacturing Plant, 85 River Street (demolished) Figure 5: 172 Lispenard Avenue (formerly Stephenson Avenue), 1931 Sanborn Map APPENDIX A: CONCEPT DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED NEW ROCHELLE YARD EXPANSION APPENDIX B: HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES APE APPENDIX C: SELECTED SANBORN MAPS OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES APE APPENDIX D: BUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENTORY FORM: KAUFMAN BUILDING i 1. Project Description 1.1 INTRODUCTION The Supplemental Section 106 Review for the Expansion of the New Rochelle Yard on the Metro North New Haven Line has been prepared as a supplemental report to the Section 106 Effects Assessment for the Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project (PSA Effects Assessment) submitted in July 2019 to the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP), also known as the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The PSA Effects Assessment, approved with a No Adverse Effect finding by the NY SHPO on July 30, 2019, noted that the evaluation of effects was based on conceptual-level project plans and that additional details would be defined during the Proposed Project’s design phase. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)/Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company’s (Metro- North) Penn Station Access (PSA) Project proposes the introduction of direct, one-seat passenger rail service between its New Haven Line (NHL) territory (Westchester County, New York, and Fairfield and New Haven Counties, Connecticut) and Pennsylvania Station New York (PSNY) on the west side of Manhattan. The Proposed Project would also provide passenger rail service at four new community-based Metro-North stations in the eastern Bronx. The new stations and additional infrastructure improvements to enhance operational flexibility and power supply would be constructed within the Hell Gate Line (HGL) right-of-way in Queens and Bronx Counties, New York, and would include the linear expansion of Metro- North’s New Rochelle Yard in New Rochelle, New York. This report has been prepared in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended and Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law of 1980. The project concerns the expansion of the existing Metro North rail yard on the New Haven Line at New Rochelle to provide for the mid-day storage and turning of passenger fleet train consists to accommodate Penn Station Access service. The existing yard is currently utilized for the storage of maintenance of way (MOW) equipment. The expansion of the yard would include the following: · Construct the required improvements to provide for storage of 48 train coaches and 1,600 feet of new track; · Construct a welfare facility and two trailers to house personnel and equipment; and, · Construct four paved roadways in the yard, with retaining walls, to enable access to the train storage areas. A detailed description of the proposed yard improvements are contained in Chapter 6. Project Description. Appendix A contains the concept drawings of the proposed expansion of the New Rochelle Yard. This supplemental report has been prepared to 1) identify the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for historic architectural resources; 2) identify the resources that are listed on, eligible for, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) that are located in the APE; and 3) evaluate the 1 effects of the expansion of the yard on the significant historic architectural resources in the APE; and 4) if there is the potential for effects, provide for the identification of methodologies to lessen the effects on historic architectural resources. A Phase IA Archaeological Assessment for the New Rochelle Yard Expansion (August 2020) was prepared by Historical Perspectives, Inc. and submitted to SHPO separately. The Phase IA found that the New Rochelle Yard APE was extensively disturbed, both vertically and horizontally; therefore, no additional archaeological consideration is recommended. This report concludes that one property in the APE, the Kaufman Building on 271 North Avenue, with a SHPO Opinion of Eligibility for listing on the NRHP, would potentially be affected during the construction for the expansion of the yard. A No Adverse Effect finding is assumed with a construction monitoring plan to ensure the protection of this resource. The following reports and SHPO findings for the historic resource review of the PSA Project have been previously prepared in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law of 1980 and the New York City Landmarks Law of 1965: § Historic Resources Project Initiation Letter (PIL) for the PSA Project, Westchester, Queens & Bronx Counties, New York. August 2013. Revised January 2014. Prepared for Metro-North by Lynn Drobbin & Associates and Parsons Brinckerhoff (PSA PIL). o The SHPO concurred with the findings of the PSA PIL in a September 16, 2013 letter and the LPC reviewed the PIL on July 7, 2014. § Historic Architectural Resources Background Study (HARBS) for the PSA Project, Westchester, Bronx & Queens Counties, New York. February
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -200 8-4978 -HCM HEARING DATE: January 15, 2009 Location: 701 South Hill St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 9 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Central City 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Downtown Los Angeles 90012 Legal Description: FR4 of Mueller Subdivision of the North ½ of Block 26 Ord’s Survey PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/ Kyung Ku Cho c/o Young Ju Kwon APPLICANT: 3200 Wilshire Blvd. #1100 Los Angeles, CA 90010 OWNER’S Robert Chattel REPRESENTATIVE: Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation 13417 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 94123 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10(c)4 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal may warrant further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: November, 2008 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 701 S. Hill Street. CHC-2008-4978-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1929 and located in the downtown area, this 13-story commercial building exhibits character-defining features of Art Deco-Gothic architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • November 12, 2019 1
    Committee of the Whole Session, Tuesday, November 12, 2019 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1ST FLOOR COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SESSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2019 3:45 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PRESENTATION BUDGET SESSIONS/DISCUSSIONS - Tuesday, November 12, 2019, at 3:45 P. M., at start of the Committee of the Whole Session AGENDA REVIEW COMMENDATION(S): PUBLIC HEARING(S) THIS EVENING 1. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331, ZONING, ZONING MAP RE: THE WATER VIEW OVERLAY ZONE - Ordinance amending Chapter 331, Zoning, Zoning Map, relative to the Water View Overlay Zone (Rev.) Intro. 9/17/19; 10/7/19 Public Hearing adjourned to 11/12/19 2. PETITION BY YOUTH STUDY BASKETBALL, LLC, RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331, ZONING CODE, ZONING MAP - BLOCK 1490, LOTS 9 (PARTIAL) and 77, FROM NB-NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, TO NB-2.0, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS - Ordinance approving the petition of Youth Study Basketball, LLC (“Petitioner”) and amending the New Rochelle Zoning map to rezone the parcels identified as Section 5, Block 1490, Lots 9 (partial) and 77, from NB-Neighborhood Business to NB-2.0-Neighborhood Business 2.0, forming part of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle. (Intro. 10/7/19) 3. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONE THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO - Resolution amending Resolution No. 186 of 2016 adopting the amended findings statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) relative to the adoption of the Downtown Overlay Zone. (Intro. 10/7/19) Committee of the Whole Session, Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase IA Archaeological and Architectural Assessment Lecount
    Phase IA Archaeological and Architectural Assessment LeCount Square Urban Renewal Project Bounded by North Avenue, Huguenot Street, Anderson Street and LeCount Place Including Block 231, Lots 9, 15, 19, 23, and 27 and the adjacent roadbeds of Anderson Street and LeCount Place New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York Phase IA Archaeological and Architectural Assessment LeCount Square Urban Renewal Project Bounded by North Avenue, Huguenot Street, Anderson Street and LeCount Place Including Block 231, Lots 9, 15, 19, 23, and 27 and the adjacent roadbeds of Anderson Street and LeCount Place New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York Prepared For: Cappelli Enterprises, Inc. 115 Stevens Avenue Valhalla, NY 10595 Prepared By: Historical Perspectives, Inc. P.O. Box 3037 Westport, CT 06880 Author: Julie Abell Horn, M.A., R.P.A. September 2005 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SHPO Project Review Number (if available): None Involved State and Federal Agencies: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, United States Postal Service Phase of Survey: Phase IA Archaeological and Architectural Assessment Location Information Location: Block 231, Lots 9, 15, 19, 23, and 27 in New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York. The block is bounded by Huguenot Street on the northwest, North Avenue on the southwest, Anderson Street on the southeast, and LeCount Place on the northeast. The project site also includes land south of Anderson Street between North Avenue and LeCount Place, formerly known as Block 228, Lots 19 and 20, but which is now unlotted and is designated as “city open space.” Last, the project site includes two roadbeds: Anderson Street from North Avenue to LeCount Place, and LeCount Place from Anderson Street to Huguenot Street.
    [Show full text]
  • City of New Rochelle, New York Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK CO MPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended December 31, 2012 CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended December 31,2012 Prepared by ,he Department of Finance I-Ioward Rattner Commissioner City of New Rochelle, New York Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended December 31,2012 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION I Principal Officials i Organization Chart ii Letter of Transmittal iii Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ix FINANCIAL SECTION I Independent Auditors' Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3 Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 18 Statement of Activities 19 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 21 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Assets 23 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 24 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 26 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund 27 Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 30 Statement of Cash Flows 32 Statement of Assets and Liabilities - Fiduciary Fund 34 Notes to Financial Statements 35 Required Supplementary Information - Other Post Employment Benefits- Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • MON-C-12607 Media Guide
    www.monroecollegemustangs.com MONROE COLLEGE MUSTANGS QUICK FACTS about the monroe mustangs The Monroe College Athletic Department fields teams in fourteen sports: baseball, men's Campus Locations basketball, women's basketball, men’s and women’s cross country, men's and women’s soccer, Bronx, NY football, softball, men’s and women’s indoor and outdoor track and field, and women's volleyball. New Rochelle, NY All Monroe teams are members of the National Junior College Athletic Association and Castries, St. Lucia participate in NJCAA Region XV. Monroe Mustangs men’s basketball, football, men’s and Founded: 1933 women’s soccer, and baseball and women’s volleyball are Division I programs as are all of the track Enrollment: 7,250 and field and cross country teams. Monroe women’s basketball and softball compete in Division II. President BASEBALL: Launched in 2005, Mustang baseball has established itself as a powerhouse. In 2006, they played in the playoffs Stephen J. Jerome in just their second season and in 2007 they advanced to the first round of the Region XV playoffs. 2008 was a turning point Athletic Director as they finished third in the Regional tournament winning the first of their two consecutive Region XV championships. Bert Shillingford Mustangs have gone on to play in Division I and II, as well as the ACBL, an elite summer league. Monroe baseball players come Sports Development and from the Caribbean, Canada, and elsewhere. There is also a strong local contingent. Former Monroe players have gone on to Information play in the NCAA and signed with Major League teams: the Oakland A’s, Toronto Blue Jays, The LA Dodgers, and Arizona Gary Axelbank Diamondbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Plan for the Law Office of Gregory T. Varian" (2011)
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Outstanding Honors Theses Honors College 4-1-2011 Marketing Plan for the Law Office of egorGr y T. Varian Marisa Varian University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/honors_et Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Varian, Marisa, "Marketing Plan for the Law Office of Gregory T. Varian" (2011). Outstanding Honors Theses. Paper 14. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/honors_et/14 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Outstanding Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GREGORY T. VARIAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 270 NORTH AVENUE - SUITE 705 TEL. 914-632-0332 NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK 10801 FAX 914-632-2022 Marisa Varian U61001063 Jill Solomon Spring 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Law Offices of Gregory T. Varian is a general practice law firm with a concentration in real estate, small business, life and estate planning, and administration. Gregory Varian, the only attorney within the firm, is well known throughout the city of New Rochelle due to his involvement in the community. Through his experience and commitment to the citizens of the greater Metropolitan area, Varian has successfully operated his law firm since 1996. Varian has previously focused on gaining clients from networking and word-of- mouth predominately for real estate closings. However, during the economic recession many people held off and continue to delay purchasing or selling a house.
    [Show full text]
  • Special City 325Th Anniversary Float Highlights Thanksgiving Parade Thanksgiving Highlights Float Anniversary 325Th City Special
    Pancakes and a Parade: The Tradition Continues The History of the Jews in 9 New Rochelle Chronicled 15 com December 2013 -- Volume 9 -- Issue 12 Complimentary Special City 325th Anniversary Float Highlights Thanksgiving Parade By Stephen E. Lipken A special float, commemorating the 325th An- niversary of the City of New Rochelle highlighted the November 23 Valenti-New Rochelle Thanksgiving Parade. The Grand Marshal was Domenic Procopio, Chairman of New Rochelle’s Civil Service Commission But that was only a small part of the floats, bands, antique vehicles and new to the parade, Peruvian Dancers, demonstrating the rich cultural heritage of New Rochelle. Iona College fielded a huge “Mayflow- er” display, running on bulldozer treads and sounding a horn reminiscent of a diesel locomotive whistle, as well as a giant inflatable “Killian the Gael” mascot on a float incorporating all Iona athletic teams plus the college’s renowned Bagpipe Band. Monroe College presented an elaborate float with the Statue of Liberty and two bright blue “Mustang” mascots. Chamber of Commerce featured a giant turkey; “Boss Tone” and “Sass Transit” (roller derby names) from Suburbia Roller Derby sported helmets with Chanukah dreidels and royal blue menorah. Some marchers promoted social awareness and responsibility, such as New Rochelle Humane Society, Salvation Army, American Red Cross and drum corps from Habitat for Humanity. Clowns joined the festivities, as well as midget fire truck, “Little Squirt, Engine Company 273.” Before the parade, a Pancake Breakfast was served in New Rochelle High School cafeteria. Seen outside the cafeteria was New Rochelle Fund for Educational Excellence, (www.nredfund.org) supporting projects that school budget cannot fund, from kindergarten to 12th grade.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester County and New Rochelle Background
    5. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS New Rochelle’s location on Westchester’s Long Island Sound shore places it within one of the state’s wealthiest counties. According to 1995 estimates from the United States Census Bureau, Westchester has New York’s fourth- highest median income, at $53,043. Only Putnam, Nassau, and Rockland, also New York City suburbs, and all much smaller in size than Westchester’s 443 square miles, has a greater median income. 5.1.1 WESTCHESTER COUNTY: HISTORY As shown in the map at left, Westchester County borders, on its south, the New York City borough of the Bronx. According to historian Frank E. Sanchis, this location at New York City’s doorstep has “always put it in the center of activity relative to the balance of the nation.” Indeed, Westchester’s development has historically been fueled by its proximity to what has been, since 1820, America’s largest city. Before the days of railroads or highways, Westchester had the trade routes of the Hudson River and Long Island Sound. In the 18th century, the primitive post roads to Albany and Boston were cut through Westchester’s rolling, wooded hills. When New York City’s population boomed after the 1825 completion of the Erie Canal, Westchester furnished many of the city’s raw and finished goods. Iron foundries were located throughout the county, and Westchester’s numerous brickyards and marble quarries provided the materials for the thousands of row houses and monumental new institutional buildings spreading across Manhattan. When Newgate Prison in Greenwich Village was no longer adequate, it was replaced in 1828 by Sing Sing, “up the river” in Westchester County.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood
    A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2001 1 Contents 1. Contents 2 2. Executive Summary 4 3. Introduction 6 4. Acknowledgements 8 5. Background Information and Existing Conditions 9 5.1Westchester Background 5.1.1 History of Westchester 9 5.1.2 Business, Industry and Land Use 11 5.2 New Rochelle Background 5.2.1 History of New Rochelle 14 5.2.2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Profilbe 16 5.2.3 New Rochelle: Business, Revenues, and Revenue Constraints 19 5.2.4 Economic Development 22 5.2.5 Land Use 24 5.2.6 Housing 25 5.2.7 Schools 26 5.3 City Park Background 5.3.1 History of City Park 27 5.3.2 Neighborhood Character 31 5.3.3 Land Use and Zoning 33 5.3.4 Business and Industry 36 5.3.5 MacLeay Apartments 37 5.3.6 Environmental Assessment 38 5.4 IKEA 43 5.4.1 Big Box Retail 47 6. Findings and Recommendations 6.1 Argument for Light Industry 48 6.1.1 Social Capital 49 6.1.2 State and Federal Aid 50 6.1.3 Locational Advantages 50 6.1.4 Demand for Industrial Space in Westchester 50 6.1.5 Industry Foci 52 6.1.6 Long Range Impact of Reinforcing Light Industry : 53 Input-Output Analysis of Development Impacts on Study Area 6.2 Zoning and Infrastructure Recommendation 57 6.2.1 Infrastructure Improvements 57 6.2.2 Zoning and Design Recommendations 62 6.3 Local Development Corporation 6.3.1 Mission, Goals and Function 65 2 6.3.2 Details about Formation 65 6.3.3 Potential Funding Sources 67 6.3.4 Land Acquisition 68 6.3.5 Benefits of the Local Development Corporation 68 7.
    [Show full text]