Univerzitet U Nišu Prirodno-Matematički Fakultet Niš Departman Za Biologiju I Ekologiju Biodiverzitet Leptira (Larvalnih Stup

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Univerzitet U Nišu Prirodno-Matematički Fakultet Niš Departman Za Biologiju I Ekologiju Biodiverzitet Leptira (Larvalnih Stup Univerzitet u Nišu Prirodno-matematički fakultet Niš Departman za biologiju i ekologiju Biodiverzitet leptira (larvalnih stupnjeva) i njihovih prirodnih neprijatelja na području podnožja planine Bukovik Кandidat: Mentor: Veljković A. Nemanja Dr Vladimir Žikić Br. Indeksa: 240 Niš, 2020 1 University of Niš Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics Department of Biology and Ecology Biodiversity of lepidopterans (larval instars) and their natural enemies at the foot of Bukovik mountain Candidate: Mentor: Veljković A. Nemanja Dr Vladimir Žikić Student’s Reg. No.: 240 Niš, 2020 2 BIOGRAFIJA KANDIDATA Nemanja Veljković je rođen 6. marta 1993. godine u Paraćinu. Završio je osnovnu školu „Despot Stefan Lazarević“ u Despotovcu 2008. godine kao nosilac Vukove diplome, a 2012. godine završava Gimnaziju u Paraćinu, prirodno-matematiči smer, sa odličnim uspehom. Osnovne akademske sudije na Prirodno-matematičkom fakultetu u Nišu, upisuje 2013. godine na Departmanu za Biologiju i ekologiju i završava 2016. godine, kada upisuje master akademske studije na istom departmanu, smer Biologija. 3 Zahvalnica Želeo bih da se zahvalim svom mentoru, prof. Vladimiru Žikiću, za pomoć i savetovanje koje mi je pružio pri pisanju master rada i identifikaciji jedinki. Takođe se za pomoć pri identifikaciji jedniki zahvaljujem prof. Marijani Ilić-Milošević. Takođe bih želeo da se zahvalim svojim roditeljima za pomoć koju su mi pružili pri sakupljanju jedinki na terenu, kao i za podršku pri pisanju samog rada. 4 Indeks 1. Uvod .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.Larva ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Larve insekata .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3. Razviće ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.4. Gusenice leptira ............................................................................................................... 8 1.5. Larve lisnih zolja – Symphyta ......................................................................................... 9 1.6. PARAZITOIDI .............................................................................................................. 11 Hymenoptera ..................................................................................................................... 12 Diptera ............................................................................................................................... 13 Strepsiptera ....................................................................................................................... 13 Neuroptera ......................................................................................................................... 14 Lepidoptera ....................................................................................................................... 14 Trichoptera ........................................................................................................................ 14 Coleoptera ......................................................................................................................... 14 2. Ciljevi istraživanja ............................................................................................................................. 15 3. Materijal i metode ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.1. Opis lokaliteta ................................................................................................................ 16 3.2. Sakupljeni materijal ....................................................................................................... 17 4. Rezultati i diskusija ........................................................................................................................... 20 4.1. Rezultati ......................................................................................................................... 20 4.2. Diskusija ........................................................................................................................ 23 5. Zaključak ........................................................................................................................................... 24 6. Sažetak ............................................................................................................................................... 25 7. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 26 8. Literatura ........................................................................................................................................... 27 5 1. Uvod 1.1. Larva Larva predstavlja juvenilni stadijum u razviću mnogih životinja pre njihove metamorfoze u adulte. Životinje sa indirekntnim razvićem, kao što je većina beskičmenjaka, kao i mnogi kičmenjaci (npr. ribe i vodozemci), poseduju larvalnu fazu tokom razvića. Izgled larve se generalno veoma razlikuje od izgleda adulta, uključujući razlike u spoljašnjoj morfologiji i organima koji se ne javljaju kod adulta. Takođe, postoje značajne razlike u ishrani, koje često isključuju kompeticiju larvi sa adultima za iste resurse. Hrana koju larve unose služi im kao izvor energije za prelazak u adultnu formu. Larve nekih vrsta (npr. neki daždevnjaci) mogu postati pubescentne, i ne razvijaju se dalje u adultnu formu. Ovo je vrsta neotenije. 1.2. Larve insekata Kod larvi insekata, jedino endopterigotna grupa poseduje različite tipove larvi. Postoji nekoliko klasifikacija, od kojih je jednu dao Berlese (1913). Na osnovu te klasifikacije postoje 4 tipa endopterigotnih larvi: 1) Apodne larve – bez nogu i sa slabom sklerotizacijom. Na osnovu sklerotizacije, postoje 3 podtipa apodnih larvi: • Eucefalne – sa veoma sklerotizovanom glavenom kapsulom. Tu pripadaju Buprestidae, Cerambycidae i podred Nematocera. • Hemicefalne – sa redukovanom glavenom kapsulom, koja se može uvući u toraks. Tu spadaju Tipulidae i podred Brachycera. • Acefalne – bez glavene kapsule,podred Cyclorrapha. 2) Protopodne larve – poseduju veliki broj različitih formi, koje često ne nalikuju normalnim formama insekata. Izležu se iz jaja koja poseduju veoma malo žumanceta. 3) Polipodne larve – poznate i kao eruciformne larve, uz torakalne noge poseduju dodatne abdominalne noge, mada su one slabo sklerotizovane i relativno neaktivne. Najbolji primer su gusenice Lepidoptera. 6 4) Oligopodne larve – imaju dobro razvijenu glavenu kapsulu i usni aparat sličan onom kod adultnih jedinki, mada bez facetovanih očiju. Poseduju 3 para nogu na toraksu, bez adbominalnih nogu. Dele se na dva podtipa: • Kampodeiformne – dobro sklerotizovane, sa dorzo-ventralno spljoštenim telom. Uglavnom dugonogi, predatori sa prognatnim tipom usnog aparata (Chrysopidae, Trichoptera, vodeni cvetovi, neke Coleoptera). • Scarabeiformne – slabo sklerotizovane, sa ravnim toraksom i abdomenom. Uglavnom kratkonoge i neaktivne ukopavajuće vrste (Scarabaeoidea i druge Coleoptera). 1.3. Razviće Insekti poseduju tri strategije razvića (Slika 1): • Ametabolno razviće • Hemimetabolno razviće • Holometabolno razviće Slika 1. A) ametabolno razviće, B) hemimetabolno razviće, C) holometabolno razviće (slike preuzete sa https://www.uky.edu/Ag/Entomology/ythfacts/4h/unit2/metavari.htm) Ametabolno razviće je tip razvića kod insekata kod kojih dolazi do blage metamorfoze ili ona izostaje, a dolazi samo do postepenog povećanja u veličini. Prisutno je kod primitivnih beskrilnih insekata, kao što je red Thysanura (McGavin, 2001; Triplehorn & Johnson, 2005). Hemimetabolno razviće, poznato i kao nepotpuna metamorfoza i paurometabolija (McGavin, 2001), je tip razvića kod određenih insekata koji obuhvata tri stadijuma: jaje, nimfu i adultni stadijum, imago. Jedinke prolaze kroz postepene stadijume, i ne postoji 7 stadijum lutke. Nimfa poseduje tanak egzoskelet, koji je sličan egzoskeletu adulta, ali izostaju krila i reproduktivni organi (Baluch, 2011). ralika između hemimetabolnih i ametabolnih insekata je u tome što se hemimetabolni adulti ne presvlače (Gullan & Cranston, 2014). Redovi hemimetabolnih insekata su: • Hemiptera • Orthoptera • Mantodea • Blattodea • Dermaptera • Odonata • Phasmatodea • Phthiraptera • Ephemeroptera • Plecoptera • Grylloblattodea Holometabolno razviće je poznato kao razviće sa preobražajem, odnosno metamorfozom. Obuhvata četiri životna stadijuma: jaje, larva, lutka i adult, odnosno imago. Holometabolija je sinapomorfna karakteristika svih insekata nadreda Endopterygota. Juvenilni stadijum kod holometabolnih insekata veoma se razlikuje od adultnog stadijuma. Kod nekih vrsta holometabolno razviće sprečava kompeticiju između larvi i adulta, jer oni zauzimaju različite ekološke niše. Morfologija i ponašanje kod svakog stadijuma su specijalizovani za različite aktivnosti. Na primer, larvalne karakteristike maksimizuju hranjenje, rast i razvoj, dok adultne karakteristike omogućuju udvaranje, parenje, polaganje jaja i širenje areala. Neke vrste holometabolnih insekata štite i hrane svoje mlade. 1.4. Gusenice leptira Larve leptira su poznate kao gusenice. Nakon izleganja iz jajeta, gusenice su polipodne larve sa cilindričnim telima, kratkim
Recommended publications
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS ROMANIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/28E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Romania. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Romania TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • St Julians Park Species List, 1984 – 2003
    St Julians Park Species List, 1984 – 2003 Fungi Species Common Name Date recorded Scleroderma citrinum Common Earth Ball 19/09/99 Amillaria mellea Honey Fungus 19/09/99 Hypholoma sublateridium Brick Caps 19/09/99 Piptoporus belulinus Birch Polypore 19/09/99 Lycoperdon perlatum Common Puffball 19/09/99 Coriolus versicolor Many-Zoned Polypore 19/09/99 Boletus erythropus - 19/09/99 Lactarius quietus Oak/Oily Milk Cap 19/09/99 Russula cyanoxantha The Charcoal Burner 19/09/99 Amanita muscaria Fly Agaric 19/09/99 Laccaria laccata Deceiver 19/09/99 Lepidoptera Species Common Name Date recorded Melanargia galathea Marbled White 1992/3 Venessa cardui Painted Lady 1992/3 Thymelicus sylvestris Small Skipper 1992/3, 06/06/98 Ochlodes venata Large Skipper 1992/3, 06/06/98 Pararge aegeria Speckled Wood 1992/3, 06/06/98 Venessa atalanta Red Admiral 1992/3 Aglais urticae Small Tortoiseshell 1992/3 Polyommatus icarus Common Blue 1992/3, 06/06/98 Pyronia tithonus Gamekeeper 1992/3 Maniola jurtina Meadow Brown 1992/3, 06/06/98 Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet 1992/3, 06/06/98 Inachis 10 Peacock 1992/3, 23/03/00 Polygonia C-album Comma 1992/3, 23/03/00 Anthocaris cardamines Orange Tip 1992/3 Noctua pronuba Large Yellow Underwing 06/06/98 Pieris brassicae Large White 06/06/98 Zygaena trifolii 5 Spot Burnet 06/06/98 Diboba caeruleocephala Figure of Eight 22/10/99 Xanthia aurago Barred Sallow 22/10/99 Chloroclysta truncate Common Marbled Carpet 22/10/99 Epirrata dilutata November Moth 22/10/99 Epirrata chrysti Pale November Moth 22/10/99, 07/11/99 Chloroclysta
    [Show full text]
  • Research Techniques in Animal Ecology
    Research Techniques in Animal Ecology Methods and Cases in Conservation Science Mary C. Pearl, Editor Methods and Cases in Conservation Science Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon Thomas K. Rudel and Bruce Horowitz Bison: Mating and Conservation in Small Populations Joel Berger and Carol Cunningham, Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation Jonathan D. Ballou, Michael Gilpin, and Thomas J. Foose, Conserving Wildlife: International Education and Communication Approaches Susan K. Jacobson Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Management: A First Time User’s Guide David S. Wilkie and John T. Finn At the End of the Rainbow? Gold, Land, and People in the Brazilian Amazon Gordon MacMillan Perspectives in Biological Diversity Series Conserving Natural Value Holmes Rolston III Series Editor, Mary C. Pearl Series Advisers, Christine Padoch and Douglas Daly Research Techniques in Animal Ecology Controversies and Consequences Luigi Boitani and Todd K. Fuller Editors C COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 2000 by Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Research techniques in animal ecology : controversies and consequences / Luigi Boitani and Todd K. Fuller, editors. p. cm. — (Methods and cases in conservation science) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0–231–11340–4 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0–231–11341–2 (paper : alk. paper) 1. Animal ecology—Research—Methodology. I. Boitani, Luigi. II. Fuller, T. K. III. Series. QH541.2.R47 2000 591.7′07′2—dc21 99–052230 ϱ Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Moth Group
    Melwood Moths Database last trap recording 2004 Shortcut Code Taxon Vernacular First Record Recorder Latest Record Recorder Method Comment Hep sylv 15 Hepialus sylvina Orange Swift 20/08/1989 JR Cilix glauc 1651 Cilix glaucata Chinese Character 07/07/1989 JR Habros pyrit 1653 Habrosyne pyritoides Buff Arches 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w sheet Teth oc 1654 Tethea ocularis Figure of Eighty 06/07/1987 JR Als aesc 1663 Alsophila aescularia March Moth 01/04/2004 JR 01/04/2004 JR 6w actinic trap 1673 1673 Hemistola chrysoprasaria Small Emerald <2000 JR beat for larvae Larvae on Clematis 1682 1682 Timandra comae Blood-vein 06/07/1987 JR id bis 1702 Idaea biselata Small Fan-footed Wave 06/07/1987 JR Id avers 1713 Idaea aversata Riband Wave 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w Sheet Xanth ferrug 1725 Xanthorhoe ferrugata Dark-barred Twin-spot Carpet 20/08/1989 JR Xanth fluct 1728 Xanthorhoe fluctuata Garden Carpet 20/08/1989 JR Lamp suffum 1750 Lampropteryx suffumata Water Carpet 01/04/2004 JR 01/04/2004 JR 6w actinic trap 1738 1738 Epirrhoe alternata Common Carpet 07/05/1988 JR Eul pyral 1758 Eulithis pyraliata Barred Straw 06/07/1987 JR Chloro trunc 1764 Chloroclysta truncata Common Marbled Carpet 19/10/2004 JR 80w sheet Cid fulv 1765 Cidaria fulvata Barred Yellow 06/07/1987 JR Colo pect 1776 Colostygia pectinataria Green Carpet 31/07/1998 JR 15/05/2004 JR 6w actinic trap Horis vitalb 1781 Horisme vitalbata Small Waved Umber 18/06/2000 JR Hydrio furc 1777 Hydriomena furcata July Highflyer 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w sheet Epirrit dil 1795
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Cave Use by Butterflies and Moths
    International Journal of Speleology 50 (1) 15-24 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2021 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Increased cave use by butterflies and moths: a response to climate warming? Otto Moog 1, Erhard Christian 2*, and Rudolf Eis3 1Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 2 Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 3Waldegg 9a, 2754 Waldegg, Austria Abstract: Between 2015 and 2019, the list of Lepidoptera from “cave” habitats (i.e., proper caves, rock shelters and artificial subterranean structures) in Austria grew from 17 to 62 species, although the effort of data collection remained nearly constant from the late 1970s onwards. The newly recorded moths and butterflies were resting in caves during daytime in the the warm season, three species were also overwintering there. We observed Catocala elocata at 28 cave inspections, followed by Mormo maura (18), Catocala nupta (7), Peribatodes rhomboidaria, and Euplagia quadripunctaria (6). More than half of the species have been repeatedly observed in caves in Austria or abroad, so their relationship with such sites is apparently not completely random. Since the increase of records in Austria coincided with a considerable rise in the annual number of hot days (maximum temperatures ≥30°C) from 2015 onwards, we interpret the growing inclination of certain Lepidoptera towards daytime sheltering in caves as a behavioral reaction to climate warming. Keywords: Lepidoptera, cave use, diurnal retreat, refuge-site preference, climate change Received 22 October 2020; Revised 26 December 2020; Accepted 29 December 2020 Citation: Moog O., Christian E.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Defoliators and Their Influence on Oak Forests in the Djerdap National Park, Serbia
    Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 62 (4), 1137-1141, 2010 DOI:10.2298/ABS1004137G INSECT DEFOLIATORS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON OAK FORESTS IN THE DJERDAP NATIONAL PARK, SERBIA MILKA M. GLAVENDEKIĆ and M. J. MEDAREVIĆ Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia Abstract - The study of oak phytophagous insects was performed in the period 1992-2010 in the region of the Djerdap National Park. More than a third (36.67%) of the phytophages in oak forests are frequent and can occasionally cause local outbreaks. The early spring defoliator phytophages so far identified in the oak forests of the Djerdap National Park are outbreak species and are significant agents of forest ecosystem degradation and decline. The most frequent species are Tortrix viridana and Operophtera brumata. It was found that Quercus petraea was more affected by dieback then Q. cerris and Q. frainetto. Key words: Defoliators, Quercus, Tortricidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae, oak dieback UDC 502.21.5(497.11):630.19 INTRODUCTION which emerge later in spring or during summer or which have two generations. Their significance is Insects feeding on the foliage of live plants, whether lower because the plants can stand the loss of they can destroy the assimilation organs completely assimilation organs without difficulty in these or not, are called defoliators. During the study of periods. oak phytophagous insects it was found that 121 species of insects were trophically related to Sessile During the study period 1992-2002, early Oak (Quercus petraea), Turkey Oak (Q. cerris) and season defoliators dominated in the oak defoliator Hungarian Oak (Q. frainetto) in the region of the complex (Glavendekić and Mihajlović, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of the Lokrum Island, Southern Dalmatia
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 29 Suppl.No 2 1227-24051-57 ZAGREB DecemberMarch 31, 31, 2021 2020 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2020.29.29 BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) OF THE LOKRUM ISLAND, SOUTHERN DALMATIA Toni Koren Association Hyla, Lipovac I 7, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Koren, T.: Butterflies and moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of the Lokrum island, southern Dalmatia. Nat. Croat., Vol. 29, No. 2, 227-240, 2020, Zagreb. In 2016 and 2017 a survey of the butterflies and moth fauna of the island of Lokrum, Dubrovnik was carried out. A total of 208 species were recorded, which, together with 15 species from the literature, raised the total number of known species to 223. The results of our survey can be used as a baseline for the study of future changes in the Lepidoptera composition on the island. In comparison with the lit- erature records, eight butterfly species can be regarded as extinct from the island. The most probable reason for extinction is the degradation of the grassland habitats due to the natural succession as well as the introduction of the European Rabbit and Indian Peafowl. Their presence has probably had a tremendously detrimental effect on the native flora and fauna of the island. To conserve the Lepidop- tera fauna of the island, and the still remaining biodiversity, immediate eradication of these introduced species is needed. Key words: Croatia, Adriatic islands, Elafiti, invasive species, distribution Koren, T.: Danji i noćni leptiri (Insecta: Lepidoptera) otoka Lokruma, južna Dalmacija. Nat. Croat., Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Response to Land Use Change Across Scales
    Biodiversity response to land use change across scales Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I - Biowissenschaften - der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg, vorgelegt von Herr Murilo Dantas de Miranda, M.Sc. geboren am 16.05.1986 in Ribeira do Pombal, Brasilien Namen der Gutacher: (1) Prof. Dr. Henrique Pereira - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Deutschland (2) Prof. Dr. Ulrich Brose - Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, Deutschland (3) Prof. Dr. Paulo Borges - Universidade dos Açores, Portugal Datum der Verteidigung: 04 Juli 2017 Dedico as minhas mainhas e a meu painho Contents List of Tables 5 List of Figures 7 Summary 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 11 Land use change and biodiversity . 11 Diversity components: alpha, beta and gamma diversity . 12 Species abundance distribution . 14 Chapter overview . 16 Chapter 2: Testing the habitat amount hypothesis 23 Chapter 3: Moth diversity patterns under farmland abandonment 60 Chapter 4: Species traits shape the relationship between local and regional SADs 84 Chapter 5: Synthesis 112 Habitat amount, not patch size and isolation . 112 Moth diversity patterns under farmland abandonment . 114 Species traits shape the relationship between local and regional SADs 115 Appendix 121 Curriculum Vitae . 121 List of publications and conference participations . 123 Authors’ contributions . 125 Eigenständigkeitserklärung . 126 List of Tables 1 Fit output of both classic and countryside species-area relationship (SAR) models. 32 2 Ranking and autocovariate model output following the Information-Theoretic approach of five statistical models explaining species richness for forest (A) and meadow (B) species as a function of forest habitat amount (Hab) at the 160 and 320 m radius scale, respectevily, patch size (Size), distance to nearest patch (Dist), and their interactions with habitat amount (Hab:Size and Hab:Dist), both with (A/B1) and without (A/B2) spatial autocorrelation (AS) .
    [Show full text]