DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan THE PENSACOLA BAY SYSTEM SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN A Comprehensive Plan for the Restoration and Preservation of the Pensacola Bay System Developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program and in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Authors: Paul Thorpe, Ron Bartel, Patricia Ryan, Kari Albertson, Thomas Pratt, and Duncan Cairns Cover: Scratchboard illustration by Diane Sterling GIS: Ferdouse Sultana Editors: Duncan Cairns, Tyler Macmillan, Ron Bartel, Maria Culbertson, Patricia Ryan, and Paul Thorpe Printing: Hank Montford Program Development Series 97-2 October 1997 recycled paper NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ==================================================== GOVERNING BOARD Charles W. Roberts, Chairman Tallahassee George Willson, Vice Chairman Tallahassee M. Copeland Griswold, Secretary/Treasurer Chumuckla John O. de Lorge Bennett Eubanks Robert L. Howell Cantonment Blountstown Apalachicola John R. Middlemas, Jr. E. Hentz Fletcher, Jr. Judy Byrne Riley Panama City Quincy Fort Walton Beach ==================================================== Douglas E. Barr — Executive Director ==================================================== For additional information, write or call: Northwest Florida Water Management District 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333 (850) 539-5999 The Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan Executive Summary Mission: “Restore and preserve the Pensacola Bay system for the benefit of all by using a comprehensive, coordinated, and integrated watershed approach supported by local government and a well-informed public.” The Pensacola Bay system (PBS) has historically supported a rich and diverse ecology and provided substantial economic and quality-of-life benefits for the residents of northwest Florida. Over the last several decades, however, it has become apparent that the cumulative effects of a variety of human activities have acted to impair the system’s ecology and diminish the benefits it provides. Such a situation, unfortunately, is common in Florida’s surface waters. In response to statewide degradation of surface waters, the Florida Legislature passed the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Act in 1987, directing the five water management districts to prioritize surface waters within their respective jurisdictions and to develop and implement plans to improve the quality of these waters and their associated resources. The SWIM Act also established the SWIM Trust Fund, to which annual appropriations could be made by the legislature for implementation of approved SWIM plans. Legislative appropriations for the SWIM program are now placed in the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund. The SWIM Program of the Northwest Florida Water Management District (NWFWMD) approaches water resource management from a watershed perspective. Thus, the Pensacola Bay system, with its associated tributaries and watershed, is recognized as an interdependent system. A watershed approach facilitates coordinated, cooperative management across jurisdictional lines and avoids fragmented, “piecemeal” management. It provides a mechanism, for example, for managing upstream activities in a manner consistent with downstream goals and for managing land use activities in a manner consistent with the uses and values of the aquatic system. This approach is also consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Ecosystem Management initiative, as the PBS watershed boundary conforms with the Greater Pensacola Bay Ecosystem Management Area (EMA) delineation. The Pensacola Bay System The Pensacola Bay system includes three major river systems: the Escambia, Blackwater, and Yellow rivers. These, in turn, discharge into the estuarine component of the system, which includes Escambia Bay, Pensacola Bay, Blackwater Bay, East Bay, and Santa Rosa Sound. The system also includes smaller tributaries of these rivers and embayments, as well as the overall watershed. The watershed covers nearly 7,000 square miles, about one-third of which is in Florida. The entire system discharges into the Gulf of Mexico, primarily through a narrow pass at the mouth of Pensacola Bay. The Pensacola Bay system has historically supported a rich and diverse ecology, productive fisheries, and considerable recreational opportunities. It has also provided an important resource for commercial shipping and military activities and has enhanced aesthetics and property values. Unfortunately, for many years, point and nonpoint source pollution, direct habitat destruction, and the cumulative impacts of development and other activities throughout the watershed have combined to degrade the health and productivity of much of the Pensacola Bay system. This degradation, in turn, has diminished the human benefits the system provides. Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan EX-1 Priority Issues The challenges facing the Pensacola Bay system may be summarized in the following broad issue areas. Florida 34% • Water and Sediment Quality. Nonpoint source pollution is carried into the Pensacola Bay system by stormwater runoff from such sources as urban and Alabama suburban lands, agricultural and forestry 66% activities, dirt roads, pavement, construction sites, golf courses, and Approximately Two-Thirds of the lawns. A number of point sources Pensacola Bay System Watershed is in (industrial and domestic wastewater Alabama discharges) also discharge directly into waters of the Pensacola Bay system. This is a relatively low energy system with limited flushing, and pollutant loading has possibly been exceeding its assimilative capacity for decades. Following many years of such pollutant loading, sediments in portions of the system are altered in size and composition, enriched with nutrients, and contaminated with metals and toxic organic compounds. • Habitat Quality. Benthic riverine and estuarine habitats have been, and continue to be, threatened by and degraded through sedimentation and deposition. Degraded water and sediment quality have also caused the degradation and loss of seagrass communities, other benthic habitats, and associated biological resources. Substantial areas of wetlands and other important habitats have been and continue to be lost throughout the watershed. These include tidal marshes, bayous, coastal strand communities, bottomland hardwood swamps, and other littoral and benthic habitats. • Administration, Planning, and Coordination. The Pensacola Bay system watershed spans two states and is subject to the management and regulatory actions of numerous local governments and various state and federal agencies. Effective protection and restoration of the system requires coordination and cooperation with these entities, community organizations, and other resource management initiatives. • Public Education and Awareness. If efforts to protect and restore the resource are to succeed, its values and vulnerabilities must be well understood by the public. This will both help individuals make informed personal decisions relevant to water resources and promote an understanding of resource management initiatives. This is particularly significant given the importance of voluntary participation and achieving consensus across diverse interests. The interrelationships between and among these issues are important to understand. For example, poor water quality, originating from both point and nonpoint source pollution, has been a primary cause of the demise of seagrasses throughout much of the system and has also degraded other benthic and littoral habitat conditions throughout much of the riverine and estuarine system. Habitat destruction, in turn, adversely impacts water and sediment quality. Regulatory and other management activities simultaneously affect water quality, habitat, and adjacent land uses, and public education and awareness are prerequisite for the success of any resource management effort. Progress and Revision of the Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan This SWIM Plan for the Pensacola Bay system is the latest revision of the plan originally approved in November 1988 and revised in November 1990. With this revision, the watershed and planning area boundary has been modified to include the Escambia, Blackwater, Yellow, Shoal, and East Bay rivers and the majority of Santa Rosa Sound. Additionally, the structure of the plan has been modified to EX-2 Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan improve readability and consistency between sections, projects have been updated, and their format has been revised. Project work completed to date includes a review of the 1970s’ Water Pollution Control Plan; preliminary nonpoint loading estimates; assessment of water quality data; analysis of historical tributary monitoring data; stormwater assessments for the Palafox/Coyle, Bayou Texar, and Bayou Chico watersheds; point source compliance assessment; Pensacola Bay system biological monitoring needs study; scientific literature review; an institutional and regulatory assessment; and initial work to protect Jones Swamp. A considerable portion of the project work described in the 1990 revision of the Pensacola SWIM Plan, however, was not completed due to funding limitations. Some of the projects detailed in this revision, therefore, entail implementation and/or completion of projects previously proposed. This plan revision does not simply represent an incremental continuation of the previous revision, however. The current
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province
    Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, and North Carolina, NAPPC South Carolina, Tennessee Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Far ms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Bloom Periods 16 Plants That Attract Pollinators 18 Habitat Hints 20 This is one of several guides for Check list 22 different regions in the United States. We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future Resources and Feedback 23 guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] Cover: silver spotted skipper courtesy www.dangphoto.net 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Ecological Region of the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee a nappc and Pollinator Partnership™ Publication This guide was funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the C.S. Fund, the Plant Conservation Alliance, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management with oversight by the Pollinator Partnership™ (www.pollinator.org), in support of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC–www.nappc.org). Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest – Coniferous Forest – Meadow Province 3 Why support pollinators? In theIr 1996 book, the Forgotten PollInators, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “ Farming feeds of 90% of flowering plants and one third of human food crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay Bridge
    Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1074 Highway 90 ANANTH PRASAD, P.E. GOVERNOR Chipley, Florida 32428 SECRETARY July 18, 2011 Ms. Lauren P. Milligan Florida State Clearinghouse Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 RE: Advance Notification Pensacola Bay Bridge Replacement PD&E Study ETDM #: 13248 From: 17th Avenue in Pensacola to Baybridge Drive in Gulf Breeze Federal Aid Project Number: 4221 078 P Financial Project ID Number: 409334-1-22-02 Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Dear Ms. Milligan: We are sending this Advance Notification (AN) Package to your office for distribution to State agencies that conduct Federal consistency reviews (consistency reviewers) in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act and Presidential Executive Order 12372. We are also distributing the AN Package to local and Federal agencies. Although we will request specific comments during the permitting process, we are asking that permitting and permit reviewing agencies (consistency reviewers) review the attached information and provide us with their comments. This is a Federal-aid action and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), will determine what type of environmental documentation will be necessary. The determination will be based upon in-house environmental evaluations and comments from other agencies. Please provide a consistency review for this project in accordance with the State’s Coastal Zone Management Program. www.dot.state.fl.us In addition, please review the project’s consistency, to the maximum extent feasible, with the approved Comprehensive Plan of the local government to comply with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Some of the Best Vines and Ground Covers for Massachusetts Gardens**
    ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 13 MARCH 6, 1953 NUMBERS 1-2 SOME OF THE BEST VINES AND GROUND COVERS FOR MASSACHUSETTS GARDENS** the past two years, two issues of Arnoldia have dealt with some of DURINGthe best shrubs and trees for Massachusetts gardens. (Arnoldia 11 : No. 1, March 9, 1951 ; Vol. 11 : No. 1, March 7, 195~?~. This issue, dealing with vines and ground covers will complete this series. Everything which was said in those bulletins on what constitutes "the best" and how such plants are chosen, is also applicable here to the vines and ground covers. It should be re-emphasized here however, that nothing is implied in the following discussions of the selected types, that would indicate some of the others listed on pages 18 and 19 are not just as serviceable. The recommended ones might be used considerably more than they are at present. It is especially important to note that each plant in the following list is avail- able from at least one of the listed nurserymen. It was impossible to contact all the nurserymen in the state, so there are undoubtedly many other sources in the state for these plants. Since they are available, your local nurseryman can obtain them for you, if he will. Glowing descriptions of plants that are unobtainable may play on the imagina- tion, but it is useless to become enthusiastic about them until they are obtain- able. Each one of these listed is available in 1953. Consequently, the gardeners of the state are urged to become better acquainted with these vines and ground covers, buy a few that are hardy and in this way increase the beauty and interest of the home grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • County by County Allocations
    COUNTY BY COUNTY ALLOCATIONS Conference Report on House Bill 5001 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act Florida House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21, 2014 County Allocations Contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act This report reflects only items contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001, the 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act, that are identifiable to specific counties. State agencies will further allocate other funds contained in the General Appropriations Act based on their own authorized distribution methodologies. This report includes all construction, right of way, or public transportation phases $1 million or greater that are included in the Tentative Work Program for Fiscal Year 2014-2015. The report also contains projects included on certain approved lists associated with specific appropriations where the list may be referenced in proviso but the project is not specifically listed. Examples include, but are not limited to, lists for library, cultural, and historic preservation program grants included in the Department of State and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Small Projects grant list (FRDAP) included in the Department of Environmental Protection. The FEFP and funds distributed to counties by state agencies are not identified in this report. Pages 2 through 63 reflect items that are identifiable to one specific county. Multiple county programs can be found on pages 64 through 67. This report was produced prior
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018
    Tyler Plant Sale - Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018 TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Summer to Sun to 8-10' Clematis 'Cardinal Wyszynski' dazzles your garden with huge 8" glowing 'Cardinal Fall Partial crimson flowers. The vibrant flowers are accented with darker crimson Wyszynski' Shade anthers and light pink filaments. Blooms in June-July and again in September. Attracts pollinators. Easy to grow in a rich, porous, alkaline soil. Provide shade for the roots with a generous layer of mulch or a shallow-rooted groundcover near the base of the vine. Received the Golden Medal at 'Plantarium' in 1990. Woody: Vine Clematis Hybrid Summer Sun to 6-8’ Fully double white flowers have yellow anthers and green outer petals. 'Duchess of Clematis Partial They are borne on the previous year’s growth and the current season’s Edinburgh' Shade new growth. This clematis does not require heavy pruning, remove only weak or dead stems in late spring. Tolerates most garden soils, needs protection from cold winds. Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Early Sun to 8-10’ A beautiful, compact vine that covers itself with 5” shell pink flowers in 'Hagley Summer Partial summer. 'Hagley Hybrid' is also know as Pink Chiffon. This is a large- Hybrid' Shade flowering clematis that can be grown as a container plant. It is best keep out of full sun to prevent bleaching of flowers. Prefers moist, well-drained soil and for best results, mulch. TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis x Clematis Summer to Sun to 6-10' This deciduous hybrid clematis, has unusual and very striking deep blue durandii Fall Partial flowers with creamy stamens on a non-clinging, scrambling vine.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Bark and Cambial Variation in the Genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae) in Taiwan
    Bark and Cambial Variation in the Genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae) in Taiwan Sheng-Zehn Yang ( [email protected] ) National Pingtung University of Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-7507 Po-Hao Chen Graduate Institute of bioresources Chien-Fan Chen Taiwan Forestry Research Institute Original Article Keywords: cogwheel-like rhytidome, ray indentation, wedge-like phloem, Ranunculaceae, vessel restriction Posted Date: October 12th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-89689/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/21 Abstract Background Studies on the anatomical characteristics of stems of Taiwanese species from the Clematis genus (Ranunculaceae) are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare cambial variation in stems of 22 Clematis species. Results The rhytidome (outer bark) was either cogwheel-like or continuous, except for in the species Clematis tashiroi. Key features of the genus were eccentric to elliptical or polygonous-lobed stems, wedge-like phloem, wedge-like rays, indentations in the axial parenchyma, and ray dilatation. The cortical sclerenchyma bers were embedded in the phloem rays with approximately 23% of the Clematis species. Both C. psilandra and C. tsugetorum had restricted vessels. There were three vascular bundle patterns, with approximately 27% of the Clematis species in Taiwan having 12 vascular bundles. The vessels dispersed throughout the stem were semi-ring-porous in most species, but were ring-porous in others. No species had diffuse-porous vessels. Only two species had a primary xylem ring located around the pith.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Goldenseal Assistant Authors: Kathleen Bennett MS, Kevin Spelman Phd, Michael Tims Phd
    An Appalachian Plant Monograph Chief author and editor: Andrew Pengelly PhD. Goldenseal Assistant authors: Kathleen Bennett MS, Kevin Spelman PhD, Michael Tims PhD. Hydrastis canadensis L. Peer review board: Paul Bergner AHG, Hans Wolmuth PhD. 1. Taxonomy Editorial team: Bevin Clare MS, Mimi Hernandez MS, James Snow Hydrastis canadensis L. MA, Amanda Vickers MS. Family: Ranunculaceae (buttercup family) Hydrastis is a monotypic genus, which some authors have placed in a Citation Instruction: Pengelly, A., separate family – Hydrastidaceae (Tobe & Keating, 1985) – though Bennett, K., Spelman, K., & Tims, M. more recent genetic studies confirm H. canadensis as the basal branch (2012). Appalachian plant of the Ranunculaceae, albeit with close ties to the Berberidaceae family monographs: Hydrastis canadensis L., (Ro, Keener, & McPheron, 1997; Chu, Li, & Qi, 2006). goldenseal. Appalachian Center for EthnoBotanical Studies. Common names: golden seal, eyebalm, eyeroot, golden root, ground raspberry, Indian dye, Indian turmeric, jaundice root, orange root, Cover illustration By Peggy Duke yellowroot, yellow pucoon. APPALACHIAN PLANT MONOGRAPHS Hydrastis canadensis 1. Taxonomy 1 2. Botanical description and 2. Botanical description distribution and distribution 2 Hydrastis canadensis is an herbaceous perennial growing from a short yellow rhizome. The rhizome has a knotty appearance bearing 3. Traditional use 3 remnants of stems or stem scars (Tobe & Keating, 1985). During the first year vegetative growth consists of a pair of leaf-like cotyledons on 4. Phytochemistry 4 long petioles. In the second year a few inch long ‘footstalk’ emerges bearing one palmately-lobed or maple-shaped leaf with biserrate 5. Pharmacology and margins near the apex. Over the next two years a true stem arises attaining a height of one foot or more, bearing two or three petiolate toxicology 11 leaves arranged alternately on the stem.
    [Show full text]
  • And Bridge Overloads
    FINAL REPORT Development of Risk Models for Florida's Bridge Management System (Reuters) Contract No. BDK83 977-11 John O. Sobanjo Florida State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St. Tallahassee, FL 32310 Paul D. Thompson Consultant 17035 NE 28th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared for: State Maintenance Office Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, FL 32309 June 2013 Final Report ii Disclaimer The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Final Report iii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in Inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft Feet 0.305 meters m yd Yards 0.914 meters m mi Miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 Square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 Square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Gulf Islands National Seashore
    The massive fort and surrounding trails cuckoos and hairy woodpeckers along offer a great vantage point for viewing the Chain of Lakes Trail. The Hutton sentinel flycatchers, gray kingbirds, Unit nearby is worth a stop to hear Tennessee, Cape May and magnolia the song of Bachman’s sparrows, and warblers. Fallouts can be seen in April the Three Notch Road site is perfect as migrants reach land for the first time. for sighting a red-headed woodpecker. Photo by David Moynahan 8 a.m. to sunset. Far western end of Free binoculars and field guides Fort Pickens Rd. (850) 934-2600, nps. are available. Dawn to dusk. 7720 org/guis Deaton Bridge Rd., (850) 983-5363, floridastateparks.org 12. Gulf Islands National Feathery Finds Seashore: Naval Osprey: Known as Florida’s fishing Live Oaks. The eagles, osprey have a distinct M wing national park’s shape and make their habitat near visitor center on brackish estuaries where they can scan Santa Rosa Sound the surface for fish. Osprey mate for is also a prime spot life – birds of a feather really do stay for sighting goldeneye, scaup, ducks, together! black-and-white warblers. 8 a.m. to sunset. 1801 Gulf Breeze Pkwy., (850) Brown Pelican: A symbol 934-2600, nps.org/guis of the Gulf Coast, the brown pelican is making A 1.5-mile loop trail 13. Garcon Point. a comeback. These runs through live oaks and picturesque water birds weigh 6-7 wetland. Wet prairie sparrows such as pounds and have a Henslow’s and LeConte’s can be seen 7-foot wingspan.
    [Show full text]