DOCSLIB.ORG

From Scales to Armour: Scale Losses and Trunk Bony Plate Gains in Ray

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Scales to Armour: Scale Losses and Trunk Bony Plate Gains in Ray bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288886; this version posted September 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 From scales to armour: scale losses and trunk bony plate gains in ray- 2 finned fishes 3 Alexandre Lemopoulos1, Juan I. Montoya-Burgos1,2,3 4 1. Department of Genetics and Evolution. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland 5 2. iGE3 institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva 6 3. E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-9820 7 Article type : Letter 8 Running title: Tegument cover transitions along actinopterygian evolution 9 Keywords: Tegument, actinopterygians, gene network, skeleton evolution, functional 10 innovation, ancestral state, phylogeny 11 12 Abstract 13 Actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes) are the most diversified group of vertebrates and are 14 characterized by a variety of protective structures covering their tegument, the evolution of 15 which has intrigued biologists for decades. Paleontological records showed that the first 16 mineralized vertebrate skeleton was composed of dermal bony plates covering the body, 17 including odontogenic and skeletogenic components. Later in evolution, the exoskeleton of 18 actinopterygian's trunk was composed of scale structures. Although scales are nowadays a 19 widespread tegument cover, some contemporary lineages do not have scales but bony 20 plates covering their trunk, whereas other lineages are devoid of any such structures. To 21 understand the evolution of the tegument coverage and particularly the transition between 22 different structures, we investigated the pattern of scale loss events along actinopterygian 23 evolution and addressed the functional relationship between the scaleless phenotype and 24 the ecology of fishes. Furthermore, we examined whether the emergence of trunk bony 25 plates was dependent over the presence or absence of scales. To this aim, we used two 26 recently published actinopterygian phylogenies, one including > 11,000 species, and by using 27 stochastic mapping and Bayesian methods, we inferred scale loss events and trunk bony 28 plate acquisitions. Our results reveal that a scaled tegument is the most frequent state in 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288886; this version posted September 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 29 actinopterygians, but multiple independent scale loss events occurred along their phylogeny 30 with essentially no scale re-acquisition. Based on linear mixed models, we found evidence 31 supporting that after a scale loss event, fishes tend to change their ecology and adopt a 32 benthic lifestyle. Furthermore, we show that trunk bony plates appeared independently 33 multiple times along the phylogeny. By using fitted likelihood models for character 34 evolution, we show that trunk bony plate acquisitions were dependent over a previous scale 35 loss event. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that tegument cover is a key 36 evolutionary trait underlying actinopterygian radiation. 37 38 Impact Summary 39 Ray-finned fishes (actinopterygians) are the most diverse vertebrate group in the world. The 40 majority of these fishes possess scales as a protective shield covering their trunk. However, 41 several lineages display a body armour composed of trunk bony plates or are devoid of any 42 protective structures. The diversity and the transitions between different tegument 43 coverage types have not been previously studied in an evolutionary framework. Here, we 44 investigate which structure was present at the origin of ray-finned fishes and how the 45 different phenotypes emerged through time. 46 We show that a scaled tegument was the most widespread sate along ray-finned fish 47 evolution, yet scale losses occurred multiple independent times, while acquiring scales again 48 almost never happened. Moreover, we reveal that scaleless teguments most probably led 49 species to change their ecology and colonise the floors of oceans and water bodies. The 50 functional advantages of a scaleless tegument in a benthic environment are yet to be 51 demonstrated, but the increased cutaneous respiration could be an explanation. We show 52 that trunk bony plates also emerged independently multiple times along the evolution of 53 ray-finned fishes but these armours protecting the trunk can only appear after a scale loss 54 event. Therefore, while the acquisitions of trunk bony plates are phylogenetically 55 independent, they need a “common ground” to emerge. All together, our findings provide 56 evidence that the various tegument covers have contributed to the outstanding 57 diversification of ray-finned fishes. 58 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288886; this version posted September 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 59 Introduction 60 Ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) represent the most diversified vertebrate lineage in the 61 world, with more than 33 thousand described species (Alfaro 2018). One of the most 62 prominent features among Actinopterygii representatives is the presence of scales in their 63 trunk tegument forming a protective layer. Scales can display various shapes and structures, 64 as they can contain different compounds and differ in histological characteristics (Moyle and 65 Cech 2004). The diversity of scales has created some confusion in the scientific community, 66 because different skeletal elements have been referred as scales despite being of different 67 origin (Schultze 2018). Yet, given the great diversity and the complexity of these structures, a 68 consensus over their nomenclature and classification still needs to be established based on a 69 comprehensive understanding of their evolutionary origin (Sire et al. 2009; Vickaryous and 70 Sire 2009). In this study, we primarily focus on two categories of mineralized structures 71 developing within the tegument of actinopterygians, micromeric scales and macromeric 72 trunk bony plates. 73 Scales, as differentiated micromeric dermal skeletal elements (sensu Sire 2003 and Sire et al. 74 2009) were present in the ancestral lineage that gave rise to Actinopterygii and Sarcopterygii 75 (Sire et al. 2009). Therefore, scales are considered a plesiomorphic trait for ray-finned fishes 76 and today the majority of them possess some type of scales (Gemballa and Bartsch 2002; 77 Sire et al. 2009). Based on different histological and morphological properties, scales have 78 been classified in two main groups: ganoid scales (in Protopteridae (bichirs) and 79 Lepisosteiformes (gars) [Meunier and Brito 2004; Ichiro et al. 2013]) and elasmoid scales (in 80 the majority of actinopterygian lineages; e.g. Sire et al., 1997; Mongera and Nüsslein- 81 Volhard, 2013). All scales possess a bony layer (e.g. bony-ridge, lammellar bone) in their 82 structure (Benthon 2004; Moyle and Cech 2004; Zhu et al. 2012). Thus, scales are a bony 83 structure covered with a scale-specific odontogenic-like tissue, in general. The nature of the 84 odontogenic-like cover and the scale organization then define the type of scale (e.g. ganoin 85 in ganoid scales; Ichiro et al. 2013). Therefore, two components are in general necessary for 86 the formation of a scale: a) a bone micromeric structure; and b) an odontogenic-like cover 87 tissue that is scale-specific (but this tissue is sometimes reduced or even absent). 88 Trunk bony plates (TBP) represent another type of tegument protection, which is present in 89 some extant actinopterygians. The origin of TBP can be traced back to the first vertebrate 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288886; this version posted September 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 90 mineralized skeleton, which was composed of TBP covered with an odontogenic tissue 91 (Keating and Donoghue 2016). Independently of their evolutionary history, TBP sensu lato, 92 can be differentiated from scales as macromeric tegumental elements composed of bone 93 only (i.e. lacking the odontogenic-like cover). TBP, as macromeric tegument structures, 94 reappeared in specific actinoptetygian lineages. For instance, the iconic seahorse 95 (Syngnathidae) exoskeleton is made of dermal bony plates covering the entire body (Lees et 96 al., 2012; Porter et al., 2013). Other examples are the Callichthyidae and the Loricariidae, 97 two species-rich families of Neotropical catfishes, that have their trunks covered with TBP 98 (Sire 1993; Covain et al. 2016; Rivera-Rivera and Montoya-Burgos 2017). Interestingly, 99 micromeric scales and macromeric TBP seem to be mutually exclusive as no extant fish 100 displays both exoskeletal structures in the trunk. 101 Despite the widespread occurrence of protective elements in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Diversity of Fish (Pisces) in Freshwater
    Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:545–567 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9034-0 FRESHWATER ANIMAL DIVERSITY ASSESSMENT Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater C. Le´veˆque Æ T. Oberdorff Æ D. Paugy Æ M. L. J. Stiassny Æ P. A. Tedesco Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The precise number of extant fish spe- species live in lakes and rivers that cover only 1% cies remains to be determined. About 28,900 species of the earth’s surface, while the remaining 16,000 were listed in FishBase in 2005, but some experts species live in salt water covering a full 70%. While feel that the final total may be considerably higher. freshwater species belong to some 170 families (or Freshwater fishes comprise until now almost 13,000 207 if peripheral species are also considered), the species (and 2,513 genera) (including only fresh- bulk of species occur in a relatively few groups: water and strictly peripheral species), or about the Characiformes, Cypriniformes, Siluriformes, 15,000 if all species occurring from fresh to and Gymnotiformes, the Perciformes (noteably the brackishwaters are included. Noteworthy is the fact family Cichlidae), and the Cyprinodontiformes. that the estimated 13,000 strictly freshwater fish Biogeographically the distribution of strictly fresh- water species and genera are, respectively 4,035 species (705 genera) in the Neotropical region, 2,938 (390 genera) in the Afrotropical, 2,345 (440 Guest editors: E. V. Balian, C. Le´veˆque, H. Segers & K. Martens genera) in the Oriental, 1,844 (380 genera) in the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment Palaearctic, 1,411 (298 genera) in the Nearctic, and 261 (94 genera) in the Australian.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida
    Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States goverment. Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Florida Integrated Science Center 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, FL 32653 [email protected] James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516 [email protected] Lad Akins Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) 98300 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 [email protected] Suggested Citation: Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins. 2009. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. Lad Akins NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. September 2009 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric Administration Gary F. Locke Jane Lubchenco John H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ i Methods .....................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Faculdade De Biociências
    FACULDADE DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ZOOLOGIA ANÁLISE FILOGENÉTICA DE DORADIDAE (PISCES, SILURIFORMES) Maria Angeles Arce Hernández TESE DE DOUTORADO PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL Av. Ipiranga 6681 - Caixa Postal 1429 Fone: (51) 3320-3500 - Fax: (51) 3339-1564 90619-900 Porto Alegre - RS Brasil 2012 PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL FACULDADE DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ZOOLOGIA ANÁLISE FILOGENÉTICA DE DORADIDAE (PISCES, SILURIFORMES) Maria Angeles Arce Hernández Orientador: Dr. Roberto E. Reis TESE DE DOUTORADO PORTO ALEGRE - RS - BRASIL 2012 Aviso A presente tese é parte dos requisitos necessários para obtenção do título de Doutor em Zoologia, e como tal, não deve ser vista como uma publicação no senso do Código Internacional de Nomenclatura Zoológica, apesar de disponível publicamente sem restrições. Dessa forma, quaisquer informações inéditas, opiniões, hipóteses e conceitos novos apresentados aqui não estão disponíveis na literatura zoológica. Pessoas interessadas devem estar cientes de que referências públicas ao conteúdo deste estudo somente devem ser feitas com aprovação prévia do autor. Notice This thesis is presented as partial fulfillment of the dissertation requirement for the Ph.D. degree in Zoology and, as such, is not intended as a publication in the sense of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, although available without restrictions. Therefore, any new data, opinions, hypothesis and new concepts expressed hererin are not available
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 3266: 41–52 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)
    Zootaxa 3266: 41–52 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Thalasseleotrididae, new family of marine gobioid fishes from New Zealand and temperate Australia, with a revised definition of its sister taxon, the Gobiidae (Teleostei: Acanthomorpha) ANTHONY C. GILL1,2 & RANDALL D. MOOI3,4 1Macleay Museum and School of Biological Sciences, A12 – Macleay Building, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Ichthyology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 3The Manitoba Museum, 190 Rupert Ave., Winnipeg MB, R3B 0N2 Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biological Sciences, 212B Biological Sciences Bldg., University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, R3T 2N2 Canada Abstract Thalasseleotrididae n. fam. is erected to include two marine genera, Thalasseleotris Hoese & Larson from temperate Aus- tralia and New Zealand, and Grahamichthys Whitley from New Zealand. Both had been previously classified in the family Eleotrididae. The Thalasseleotrididae is demonstrably monophyletic on the basis of a single synapomorphy: membrane connecting the hyoid arch to ceratobranchial 1 broad, extending most of the length of ceratobranchial 1 (= first gill slit restricted or closed). The family represents the sister group of a newly diagnosed Gobiidae on the basis of five synapo- morphies: interhyal with cup-shaped lateral structure for articulation with preopercle; laterally directed posterior process on the posterior ceratohyal supporting the interhyal; pharyngobranchial 4 absent; dorsal postcleithrum absent; urohyal without ventral shelf. The Gobiidae is defined by three synapomorphies: five branchiostegal rays; expanded and medially- placed ventral process on ceratobranchial 5; dorsal hemitrich of pelvic-fin rays with complex proximal head.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: Evolution, Conservation, and Decline
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: Evolution, Conservation, and Decline Camm C. Swift1¤, Brenton Spies2, Ryan A. Ellingson2,3, David K. Jacobs2* 1 Emeritus, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States of America, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States of America ¤ Current address: 6465 Elmo Road, Cumming, Georgia 30028–4720, United States of America * [email protected] a11111 Abstract A geographically isolated set of southern localities of the formerly monotypic goby genus Eucyclogobius is known to be reciprocally monophyletic and substantially divergent in mito- chondrial sequence and nuclear microsatellite-based phylogenies relative to populations to OPEN ACCESS the north along the California coast. To clarify taxonomic and conservation status, we con- ducted a suite of analyses on a comprehensive set of morphological counts and measures Citation: Swift CC, Spies B, Ellingson RA, Jacobs DK (2016) A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus from across the range of Eucyclogobius and describe the southern populations as a new Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: species, the Southern Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius kristinae, now separate from the Evolution, Conservation, and Decline. PLoS ONE Northern Tidewater Goby Eucyclogobius newberryi (Girard 1856). In addition to molecular 11(7): e0158543. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158543 distinction, adults of E. kristinae are diagnosed by: 1) loss of the anterior supratemporal lat- Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng-Kung eral-line canals resulting in higher neuromast counts, 2) lower pectoral and branched caudal University, TAIWAN ray counts, and 3) sets of measurements identified via discriminant analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1.Xlsx
    Bone type Bone type Taxonomy Order/series Family Valid binomial Outdated binomial Notes Reference(s) (skeletal bone) (scales) Actinopterygii Incertae sedis Incertae sedis Incertae sedis †Birgeria stensioei cellular this study †Birgeria groenlandica cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Eurynotus crenatus cellular Goodrich, 1907; Schultze, 2016 †Mimipiscis toombsi †Mimia toombsi cellular Richter & Smith, 1995 †Moythomasia sp. cellular cellular Sire et al., 2009; Schultze, 2016 †Cheirolepidiformes †Cheirolepididae †Cheirolepis canadensis cellular cellular Goodrich, 1907; Sire et al., 2009; Zylberberg et al., 2016; Meunier et al. 2018a; this study Cladistia Polypteriformes Polypteridae †Bawitius sp. cellular Meunier et al., 2016 †Dajetella sudamericana cellular cellular Gayet & Meunier, 1992 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Calamoichthys sp. cellular Moss, 1961a; this study †Pollia suarezi cellular cellular Meunier & Gayet, 1996 Polypterus bichir cellular cellular Kölliker, 1859; Stéphan, 1900; Goodrich, 1907; Ørvig, 1978 Polypterus delhezi cellular this study Polypterus ornatipinnis cellular Totland et al., 2011 Polypterus senegalus cellular Sire et al., 2009 Polypterus sp. cellular Moss, 1961a †Scanilepis sp. cellular Sire et al., 2009 †Scanilepis dubia cellular cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Saurichthyiformes †Saurichthyidae †Saurichthys sp. cellular Scheyer et al., 2014 Chondrostei †Chondrosteiformes †Chondrosteidae †Chondrosteus acipenseroides cellular this study Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser baerii cellular Leprévost et al., 2017 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 6 – Integument ‐ Scale • a Scale Is a Small Rigid Plate That Grows out of an Animal’ S Skin to Provide Protection
    Lecture 6 – Integument ‐ Scale • A scale is a small rigid plate that grows out of an animal’s skin to provide protection. • Scales are quite common and have evolved multiple times with varying structure and function. • Scales are generally classified as part of an organism's integumentary system. • There are various types of scales according to shape and to class of animal. • Although the meat and organs of some species of fish are edible by humans, the scales are usually not eaten. Scale structure • Fish scales Fish scales are dermally derived, specifically in the mesoderm. This fact distinguishes them from reptile scales paleontologically. Genetically, the same genes involved in tooth and hair development in mammals are also involved in scale development. Earliest scales – heavily armoured thought to be like Chondrichthyans • Fossil fishes • ion reservoir • osmotic control • protection • Weighting Scale function • Primary function is protection (armor plating) • Hydrodynamics Scales are composed of four basic compounds: ((gmoving from inside to outside in that order) • Lamellar bone • Vascular or spongy bone • Dentine (dermis) and is always associated with enamel. • Acellular enamel (epidermis) • The scales of fish lie in pockets in the dermis and are embeded in connective tissue. • Scales do not stick out of a fish but are covered by the Epithelial layer. • The scales overlap and so form a protective flexible armor capable of withstanding blows and bumping. • In some catfishes and seahorses, scales are replaced by bony plates. • In some other species there are no scales at all. Evolution of scales Placoid scale – (Chondricthyes – cartilagenous fishes) develop in dermis but protrude through epidermis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of Composite Elasmoid Fish Scale Assemblies and Their
    journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 19 (2013) 75–86 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/jmbbm Mechanics of composite elasmoid fish scale assemblies and their bioinspired analogues Ashley Browninga, Christine Ortizb,n, Mary C. Boycea,n aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA bDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA article info abstract Article history: Inspired by the overlapping scales found on teleost fish, a new composite architecture Received 28 July 2012 explores the mechanics of materials to accommodate both flexibility and protection. These Received in revised form biological structures consist of overlapping mineralized plates embedded in a compliant 5 November 2012 tissue to form a natural flexible armor which protects underlying soft tissue and vital Accepted 11 November 2012 organs. Here, the functional performance of such armors is investigated, in which the Available online 24 November 2012 composition, spatial arrangement, and morphometry of the scales provide locally tailored Keywords: functionality. Fabricated macroscale prototypes and finite element based micromechanical Biomimetic models are employed to measure mechanical response to blunt and penetrating indentation Composite loading. Deformation mechanisms of scale bending, scale rotation, tissue shear, and tissue Natural armor constraint were found to govern the ability of the composite to protect the underlying Fish scale substrate. These deformation mechanisms, the resistance to deformation, and the resulting work of deformation can all be tailored by structural parameters including architectural arrangement (angle of the scales, degree of scale overlap), composition (volume fraction of the scales), morphometry (aspect ratio of the scales), and material properties (tissue modulus and scale modulus).
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]