DOCSLIB.ORG

KEY Developm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Redline Redline Point Point <allRedline other values> <all other values> CatPoint Redline Cat! A:<all Scattered other values> Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI <all other values> ! A: Scattered Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI Point LinesCat <all other values> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI Lines! A: Scattered Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI ! <allA: Scattered other values> Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD Cat <all other values> DDDDDD LcatLines AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDDDDDDDD SI Lines DDDDDDDDDDDD ! A: Scattered Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD Lcat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI J:<all Defunct other values>Hedge Species-poor DDDDDD <all other values> Redline DDDDDD J:Redline Defunct Hedge Species-poor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI Lines VI VI VI VI VI VI VI DDDDDD Lcat J: Hedge/Trees Native Species-rich AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI Lcat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI Point DDDDDD VIPointVI VI VI VI VI VI J:<all Hedge/Trees other values> Native Species-rich DDDDDD J: Defunct Hedge Species-poor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD G: Running Water <all other values> DDDDDD <all other values> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI Lcat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI MARNELVI VI VI VI VI VI VI G:J: Hedge/TreesRunningPARK, Water BASINGSTOKE Native Species-rich AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD VI VI VI VI VI VI VI J: Hedge/Trees Native Species-rich Cat DDDDDD Cat J:J: DryDefunct ditch Hedge Species-poor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI J:G: Dry Running ditch Water ! A: Scattered Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI SISI SIPHASEVVVVVVV! SI G:1 Running SIAND 2 SI Water ECOLOGICAL SI SI SURVEYS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI J:A: IntactScattered Hedge Broadleaved Native Speicies-rich AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! SI SI SI SI SI SI SI J: Hedge/Trees Native Species-rich VVVVVVV J: DryIntact ditch Hedge Native Speicies-rich Lines 1AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI PolygonLinesJ: Dry ditch AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! SI SI SI SI SI SI SI Map 2 G:Locations Running Water of Anabats AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI VVVVVVVPolygon <all other values> VVVVVVV <allJ:<allRedline Intact otherother Hedge values>values> Native Speicies-rich AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI J: Dry ditch DDDDDD ! DDDDDD Client: Landmark<all other Environmental values> ConsultantsDDDDDD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! SI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD Lcat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SIPcatPolygonLcat SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI PolygonPoint DDDDDD 4 DDDDDD Date: September 2010 Status: Draft AAVVVVVVV J: Intact Hedge Native Speicies-richDDDDDD ! DDDDDD Pcat J: Defunct Hedge Species-poor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI J:<allJ: ArableDefunct other values> Hedge Species-poor I <all other values> ! V <all other values> I V AA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA5 SI SI I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SIV V SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI I V J: Arable AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SIV VV SI SI Polygon VI VI VI VI VI VI VI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SII I V SI SI V V V IS IS IS J: Hedge/Trees Native Species-rich I V V I V VIPcatVI VI VI VI VI VI Redline V VV B:J: Hedge/TreesNeutral Semi-improved Native Species-rich I I V Cat V V V V AAPcat I I VV Boundary_Site V V V V V V V V I V V I V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI V VSIV V SI SI V AAIS IS IS V I I V <all other values> V V Redline V V V V V ! V V B: Neutral Semi-improved I I AAIS IS IS V V V V V V V AA J: Arable AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI V SI SIV SI ! G: Running Water ! V I I V V I V V V V V A:Redline Scattered Broadleaved AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SI V SI SI SIJ: Arable SI SI SI SI V Point AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI I I SI SI SI IS ISV IS IS V V I V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SIV SIVSI I SI SI G:G: StandingRunning WaterWater V VV AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SIV SII I SI SI V V V I V V I V Point VV V I I V IS IS IS V I V V V V I V V V V KEY 41 V V I V I V Pcat V I V V V V VI V V Point I I V V V IS IS IS IS IS IS IS V V I V V V 39 V I V G: Standing Water VV V V <all other values> I I V V IS IS IS B: Neutral Semi-improved V V I V V I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAISV IS IS IS V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SIVV SIVV SIV SI AALines J: Dry ditch I Point I V V B: Neutral Semi-improved V V I V I V V V V V AA <all other values> V I I V V V AA V A:J: DryBroadleaved ditch Plantation I V V V V I V V V V V ! V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI15 SI SIV SI SI V V I I V V V I J: Arable V V I V V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SI V SI SI SISI SI SI SI SI SI SI V V V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI V SI SI SI <all other values> V I I I V I V V IS IS IS V V I V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SIISV SI IS IS SI IS SI SI V V 40 V V V V V I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SII V SII SI V V V V I I V IS IS IS Assessment site V V V V IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS IS IS V I V Cat I <all other values> I A:<all Broadleaved other values> Plantation 3 V I IS IS ISV V IS V I V V V V VVVVVVV V V V G: Standing Water I I I boundaryRedline J: Intact Hedge Native Speicies-rich I V Development Boundary IS IS ISV V IS VI V V V V V V G: StandingCat Water I I I I V VVVVVVV V V VI V V V A:J: IntactBroadleaved Hedge Semi-naturalNative Speicies-rich V IS IS IS 14 V V I I I I VDDDDDD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SIV V SIVI V SIV SI SI V V IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS IS IS V Cat B: Neutral Semi-improved I I I V V I I V V AA! ! V V Semi-natural broadleaved 42 V V IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS ISI I IS I DDDDDDVV A: Scattered Broadleaved V V V I I V V V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAISV IS IS IS V V V I I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! ! SI SI SI SIV SII SI SI LcatCat I V V ! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SI V V I VSI SI SISI SI SIwoodland SI SI SI SI V VV A: Broadleaved Semi-natural V DDDDDD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAISV IS IS IS A: Scattered Broadleaved V I I I I V V A: Broadleaved Plantation AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SIV V I V SI SI SI V Point V Polygon V V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SIV SII SII I SI SI IS IS IS V I V V V I V DDDDDD V ! A: Broadleaved Plantation VV DDDDDD V I V IS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISI IS V I PolygonA: Scattered Broadleaved I A: Coniferous Plantation 13 V V V I V VV Scattered semi-natural AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! SI SI SIIS SI IS IS SII IS I SI SI DDDDDD Redline I V DDDDDD IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS ISV I IS G: Standing Water VV ! IS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISI I IS I J:A: DefunctScattered Hedge Broadleaved Species-poor V V V I Lines VV broadleavedAnabat trees Number, As Referenced in I DDDDDD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISI I I IS V 1 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SISI SI SIV SI SIV SIV SI SI SI SI SI SI SI <all other values> V <all other values> I I I I V A: ConiferousLines Plantation 43 V V V DDDDDD V I A:<all Broadleaved other values> Semi-natural I I V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS ISV IS ISV IS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SIV I SI SI BroadleavedA: Broadleaved plantation Semi-natural AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI I I V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAISV IS IS IS DDDDDDLines AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS VV A: Mixed Plantation I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS SI SI SIIS SI IS IS SII I IS V SI SI SI Point V Report V <all other values> 12 V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI I woodlandA: Broadleaved Plantation I I V VI VI VI VI VI VI VI ! IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS IS IS 37 VV LinesJ: Hedge/Trees Native Species-rich 44 I Redline ! 38 I I V <all other values> VV Cat Pcat AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SII SI SI I I V IS IS IS IS IS VV DDDDDD A: Mixed Plantation I I Pcat Coniferous plantation I V <all other values> V A: Coniferous Plantation AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAISIS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISV I IS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS SI SISI SI SIIS SI IS SI ISI SIV IS SI SI SI SI DDDDDD SI SI SI <allA: Coniferous other values> Plantation V I woodland AA IS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISV IS Lcat A: Scrub Dense/Continuous 11! I ! <all other values> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAV DDDDDDDDDDDD AA A:A: BroadleavedScattered Broadleaved Semi-natural J: Arable AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SII SI SI SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI V PointG: RunningLcat Water SI SI SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SII SI SI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS SI10 SI SI SI SIV SI SI DDDDDDDDDDDD MixedJ: Arable plantation V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI DDDDDD I IS IS IS IS IS IS IS ISI IS DDDDDD V IS IS IS IS IS V I A: Scrub Dense/Continuous V Lcat I ! IS IS IS IS IS I DDDDDD A: Mixed Plantation V I DDDDDD woodland V V DDDDDDCat V DDDDDD J: Defunct Hedge Species-poorI V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS SI SI9 SI SII SI SI SI SI V 45 V I A: Mixed Plantation VV V V Lcat I V I I V DDDDDD DDDDDD A: Scrub Scattered V V IS IS IS V V V DDDDDD DDDDDD <all other values>J: DefunctI HedgeVV Species-poor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SII SI SII V SI SI LinesA: Coniferous PlantationV V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI8 SI SIV SI SIV SI SI IS IS IS IS IS V V DDDDDD IS DDDDDDSI IS Species-rich, semi-improved I VV B: Neutral Semi-improved I VV DDDDDD DDDDDD J: Dry ditch V V AA ISIS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS V V J: Defunct Hedge Species-poorI VV V B: NeutralV Semi-improvedV ! V V AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS IS IS IS IS I V V grassland V I AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI SI SI SI SI SI SI V SI AA A: ScatteredV Broadleaved V V A: Scrub V ScatteredV AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASI
Recommended publications
  • Microlepidoptera in Nederland, Vooral in 2007-2010 Met Een Terugblik Op 30 Jaar Faunistisch Onderzoek

    Microlepidoptera in Nederland, Vooral in 2007-2010 Met Een Terugblik Op 30 Jaar Faunistisch Onderzoek

    entomologische berichten 91 73 (3) 2013 Microlepidoptera in Nederland, vooral in 2007-2010 met een terugblik op 30 jaar faunistisch onderzoek K. J. (Hans) Huisman J. C. (Sjaak) Koster Tymo S.T. Muus Erik J. van Nieukerken TREFWOORDEN Faunistiek, nieuwe waarneming, provincies, areaaluitbreidingen Entomologische Berichten 73 (3): 91-117 In de jaren 2007-2010 werden maar liefst elf soorten kleine vlinders nieuw voor onze fauna gevonden: Infurcitinea teriolella, Bucculatrix ulmifoliae, Caloptilia fidella, Phyllonorycter issikii, Coleophora motacillella, Cochylis molliculana, Cnephasia sedana, Clepsis dumicolana, Lobesia botrana, Pseudococcyx tessulatana en Evergestis aenealis. Daarnaast werden drie soorten al elders gemeld: Caloptilia hemidactylella, Cydalima perspectalis en Bucculatrix ainsliella. Na 30 jaar van jaarlijsten geven we een evaluatie, met onder andere een totaal van 128 nieuw gemelde soorten. Dit zijn er minder dan in Denemarken, maar meer dan op de Britse Eilanden of in Zweden. We verklaren deze verschillen door het verschil in oppervlak van de landen: hoe kleiner het land, hoe meer kans dat er nieuwe soorten gevonden worden. Dit jaaroverzicht is het laatste dat in deze vorm verschijnt. Dit is het negentiende jaaroverzicht van de Nederlandse Micro- die beoordeeld konden worden door specialisten. We hopen dat lepidoptera sedert 1983. Een index van alle overzichten tot 2000 we een goed evenwicht gevonden hebben in het spanningsveld werd gegeven door Koster & Van Nieukerken (2003). tussen volledigheid en betrouwbaarheid. De jaren 2007–2010 waren wederom aan de warme kant met Door de snelle berichtgeving op internet wordt het voor het uitzondering van 2010, dat sinds 1996 het eerste jaar was met samenstellen van een gedrukte ‘jaarlijst’ steeds moeilijker om een temperatuur beneden het langjarige gemiddelde van 9,8°C voldoende actueel te blijven en toch de grens van een bepaald (jaargemiddelden 2007-2010 11,2; 10,6; 10,5; 9,1°C).
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    . JVASV^iX ^ N^ {/) lSNrNVIN0SHilWS*^S3ldVaan^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni <n - M ^^ <n 5 CO Z ^ ^ 2 ^—^ _j 2 -I RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVdan U r- ^ ^ 2 CD 4 A'^iitfwN r: > — w ? _ ISNI NVINOSHilWS SBiyVdan LIBRARIES'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION f^ <rt .... CO 2 2 2 s;- W to 2 C/J • 2 CO *^ 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS S3liiVyan_L; iiSNi"^NViNOSHiiNS S3iyvaan libraries smithsonian'^institution i^ 33 . z I/' ^ ^ (^ RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3lbVHan Li CO — -- — "> — IISNI NVINOSHimS S3IMVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION N' 2 -J 2 _j 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIifllliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSIMVyail L! MOTITI IT I f\t _NviN0SHiiws'^S3iMvaan libraries'^smithsonian^institution NOlin z \ '^ ^—s^ 5 <^ ^ ^ ^ '^ - /^w\ ^ /^^\ - ^^ ^ /^rf^\ - /^ o ^^^ — x.ii:i2Ji^ o ??'^ — \ii Z ^^^^^""-^ o ^^^^^ -» 2 _J Z -J , ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIXniliSNI NVINOSHillMS $3 I M VH 8 !!_ LI BR = C/> ± O) ^. ? CO I NVINOSHimS S3iaVHan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIlf CO ..-. CO 2 Z z . o .3 :/.^ C/)o Z u. ^^^ i to Z CO • z to * z > SMITHS0NIAN_1NSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHimS S3 I d ViJ 8 n_LI B R UJ i"'NViNOSHiiws S3ibvyan libraries smithsonian"^institution Noiir r~ > z r- Z r- 2: . CO . ^ ^ ^ ^ ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SSiyVMail LI BR CO . •» Z r, <^ 2 z 5 ^^4ii?^^ ^' X^W o ^"^- x life ^<ji; o ^'f;0: i >^ _NVIN0SHiIlMs'^S3iyVdan^LIBRARIEs'^SMITHS0NlAN INSTITUTION NOlif Z \ ^'^ ^-rr-^ 5 CO n CO CO o z > SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I ^Vd 8 11 LI BR >" _ . z 3 ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. SOKOLOFF fre s Assistant Editors J.A.
  • PATZAK, Aschersleben

    PATZAK, Aschersleben

    © Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte;Entomologische download unter Nachrichten www.biologiezentrum.at und Berichte, 27, 1983 2 71 H. PATZAK, Aschersleben Beiträge zur Insektenfauna der DDR: Lepidoptera, Nachträge IV, Coleophoridae S u m m a r y Further discoveries of casebearer moths are reported and notes on changes in the nomenclature are given. P e 3 IO M e JlonO^HHRDTCJI CnMCOK HaXOflOK HeXJIOHOCMKOB M yK33bIBaiOTCfl Ha MSMeHeHMH B HOMeHKJiaType. PATZAK, H., Beitr. Ent. 24, 153-278; 1974 Coleophora vacciniella HERRICH- Auf der Grundlage der oben genannten Arbeit SCHÄFFER, 1861 wird die Liste der in der DDR gefundenen Co: NSG Niederspree bei Rietschen, Coleophoriden durch weitere Fundorte ergänzt V. 1981, LEUTSCH. und auf nomenklatorische Änderungen hinge­ Neu für den Bezirk Cottbus! wiesen. S. 242: Coleophora orbitella ZELLER, 1849 S. 233: Metriotes lutarea (HAWORTH, 1828) SU: Lauscha, 28. VII. 1978, PATZAK. RO: K arlsburg, Kr. Greifswald, 30. V Neu für den Bezirk Suhl! 1982, SUTTER. S. 243: Coleophora binderella (KOLLAR, 1832) Neu für den Bezirk Rostock! HA: Neuplatendorf, Ostharz, 10. VI. S. 234: Coleophora lutipennella (ZELLER, 1838) 1978, PATZAK. SCH: Rabensteinfeld bei Schwerin, 1. S. 244: Coleophora trifolii (CURTIS, 1832) bis 4. VIII. 1971, GAEDIKE & RINN­ NBG: Usadel, 9. VII. 1981, GAEDIKE. HOFER. SU: Themar, 13. VII. 1982, SUTTER. S. 235: Coleophora flavipennella (DUPON- Neu für den Bezirk Suhl! CHEL, 1843) S. 245: Coleophora frischella (LINNAEUS, 1758) RO: Greifswald, 30. VII. 1971, KOPP. SCH: Rabensteinfeld bei Schwerin, 17. NBG: Strasburg, 15. VII. 1970, KOPP. bis 23. VII. 1979, RINNHOFER. HA: Pouch, Kr. Bitterfeld, 2. VII. 1982. MA: Haldensleben, 28. V I.-3.
  • Identification of Micro-Moth Families

    Identification of Micro-Moth Families

    Identification of micro-moth families Introduction This guide is intended for use by Garden Moth Scheme (GMS) recorders and other British and Irish moth enthusiasts. It is aimed at those who already have some understanding of moth taxonomy and morphology but struggle to easily home-in on which moth family a micro- moth belongs to. For further information about how to start out moth- trapping see www.gardenmoths.org.uk. There are currently over 1600 British and Irish micro-moth species, compared to around 800 species of macro-moth and 60 species of butterfly, so species identification is particularly challenging. Narrowing down identification to species requires additional information from training courses, websites and field guides. This guide shows photographs of 45 micro-moth families at rest, together with identification tips, similar species, and the number of species in that family. Taxonomists disagree on the order and arrangement of families, but this guide follows the numbering system of Bradley and Fletcher (B&F) wherever possible. The guide is intended to be used with the excellent Field Guide to the Micromoths of Great Britain and Ireland by Sterling, Parsons and Lewington, British Wildlife Publishing (2012, SPL), which covers 1000+ micro-moth species. However, for the uninitiated, facing a light trap full of micro-moths starting from scratch with SPL can be both daunting and time-consuming. Family names are different and are shown in a different order in SPL and B&F, so in order to reduce confusion, after the B&F numbers are quoted for each family the page numbers for the plates in SPL are also given.
  • Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera

    Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera

    Prejeto / Received: 14.6.2010 Sprejeto / Accepted: 19.8.2010 Check list of Slovenian Microlepidoptera Tone LESAR(†), Marijan GOVEDIČ1 1 Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Klunova 3, SI-1000 Ljubljana; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A checklist of the Microlepidoptera species recorded in Slovenia is presented. Each entry is accompanied by complete references, and remarks where appropriate. Until now, the data on Microlepidopteran fauna of Slovenia have not been compiled, with the existing information scattered in literature, museums and private collections throughout Europe. The present checklist is based on records extracted from 290 literature sources published from 1763 (Scopoli) to present. In total, 1645 species from 56 families are listed. Keywords: Microlepidoptera, checklist, Slovenia, fauna Izvleček. SEZNAM METULJČKOV (MICROLEPIDOPTERA) SLOVENIJE – Predstavljen je seznam vrst metuljčkov, zabeleženih v Sloveniji. Za vsako vrsto so podane reference, kjer je bilo smiselno, pa tudi komentar. Do sedaj podatki o metuljčkih Slovenije še niso bili zbrani, obstoječi podatki pa so bili razpršeni v različnih pisnih virih, muzejskih in zasebnih zbirkah po Evropi. Predstavljeni seznam temelji na podatkih iz 290 pisnih virov, objavljenih od 1763 (Scopoli) do danes. Skupaj je navedenih 1645 vrst iz 56 družin. Ključne besede: Microlepidoptera, seznam vrst, Slovenija, živalstvo NATURA SLOVENIAE 12(1): 35-125 ZOTKS Gibanje znanost mladini, Ljubljana, 2010 36 Tone LESAR & Marijan GOVEDIČ: Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera / SCIENTIFIC PAPER Introduction Along with beetles (Coleoptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are one of the most attractive groups for the amateur insect collectors, although the number of researchers professionally engaged in these two groups is relatively high as well.
  • Rare and New for the Lithuanian Fauna Species of Lepidoptera

    Rare and New for the Lithuanian Fauna Species of Lepidoptera

    48 BULLETIN OF THE LITHUANIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Volume 3 (31) RARE AND NEW FOR THE LITHUANIAN FAUNA SPECIES OF LEPIDOPTERA IVINSKIS POVILAS1, JOLANTA RIMŠAITĖ1, ŽILVINAS PŪTYS2, VAIDA PAZNEKAITĖ3 1Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-08412, Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected]; 2 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] Introduction After examination of newly collected and determined material in the collection of the Laboratory of Entomology (Nature Research Centre) 5 new and 59 rare for the Lithuanian fauna Lepidoptera species from 27families were identified and are presented in this paper. Material and Methods The data were collected during field investigations by the authors P. Ivinskis (P.I.), J. Rimšaitė (J.R.), Ž. Pūtys (Ž.P.) and Vaida Paznekaitė (V.P.), some data – by Agata Skorb (A. K) and J. P. Kaitila (J.- P. K). Breeding from larvae, netting, light and wine trapping were used to collect moths. Light trapping was performed with screen (160 W mixed light lamp) and automatic traps with 300 W solar type lamps. The material was identified using the works of Bengtsson et al., 2008, Bengtsson & Johansson, 2011, Slamka, 2010. Data on distribution and faunistics follows Aarvik et al., 2017. Taxonomical treatment and distribution follows the Fauna Europaea database (Karsholt & Nieukerken, 2013). The specimens are deposited in the collection of Nature Research Centre. Species new for the Lithuanian fauna are marked with an asterisk (*). List of localities Locality Administrative district Coordinates (LAT, LONG) Alksnynė Neringa mun. 55.65749, 21.12161 Baltoji Vokė Šalčininkai district 54.46533, 25.13192 Būtingė (1) Kretinga district 56.06820, 21.06659 Būtingė (2) Kretinga district 56.07025, 21.11042 Dūkštų Ąžuolynas f.
  • Changes in the List of Finnish Insects During 2001–2005

    Changes in the List of Finnish Insects During 2001–2005

    © Entomologica Fennica. 6 June 2007 Changes in the list of Finnish insects during 2001–2005 Hans Silfverberg Silfverberg, H. 2007: Changes in the list of Finnish insects during 2001–2005. — Entomol. Fennica 18: 82–101. During the period 2001–2005, 769 species have been added to the list of Finnish insects, and 213 species have been deleted from it. At the end of year 2005, a total of 20,533 insect species were known from Finland. The Finnish insect fauna is generally well known. Still, particularly for Diptera Nematocera and Hymenop- tera Parasitica, and to some degree also in part of Hemiptera, there still remains much to be done. H. Silfverberg, Zoological Museum, P.O.Box 26, 00014 Helsingfors, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 March 2006, accepted 23 May 2006 1. Introduction ported, and has not been included in the species total. Again square brackets have been employed This paper is a sequel to a similar list published in for the name used in the original record when dif- 2001 (Silfverberg 2001, Entomol. Fennica 12: ferent from the one used here. Other symbols are 227–243), which itself was a continuation of a se- * = new to science and ! = different from the ries of lists published in 1921–1996 first by check list mentioned for the order. Hellén and then by Silfverberg. Insect species A thorough examination of earlier lists added to the fauna of Finland during the five-year showed that a few species had been added twice. period are listed, with references, as are those de- In order to correct the numbers, corresponding leted from the fauna.
  • Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin 2010

    Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin 2010

    Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin Number 10 April 2009 – March 2010 Butterfly Conservation Report No. S10-10 Compiled & Edited by A. Rosenthal (Conservation Officer – Threatened Species), M. Parsons (Head of Moth Conservation) & N. Bourn (Director of Conservation). April 2010 Butterfly Conservation Company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468) Registered Office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset. BH20 5QP Charity registered in England and Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268) www.butterfly-conservation.org Rosenthal, A., Parsons, M. & Bourn, N. & (eds.) 2010 Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin Number 10: April 2009 – March 2010, Butterfly Conservation, Wareham. (Butterfly Conservation Report No. S10-10) Contents: 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... 2 3 Conservation action for UK Biodiversity Action Plan Lepidoptera ................................... 2 3.1 Update on UK BAP moths – a summary for the year 2009 ....................................... 3 3.2 UK BAP moth newsletter ......................................................................................... 17 3.3 Update on UK BAP butterflies a summary for the year 2009 .................................. 17 3.4 Additional Species Factsheets ................................................................................ 22 4 Butterfly

  • British Journal of Entomology and Natural History

    199' MARCH , ,,. __. ISSN 0952-7583 Vol. 10. Part 1 QL461. B74 V. 10 no. 1 March 1997 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY Published by the British Entomological and Natural History Society and incorporating its Proceedings and Transactions Editor: Richard A. Jones, B.Sc. F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 13 Bellwood Road Nunhead London SE15 3DE (Tel: 0171 732 2440) (Fax: 0171 277 8725) Editorial Committee: D. J. L. Agassiz, M.A.. Ph.D.. F.R.E.S. T. G. Howarth. B.E.M., F.R.E.S. R. D. G. Barrington, B.Sc. I. F. G. McLean. Ph.D.. F.R.E.S P. J. Chandler, B.Sc, F.R.E.S. M. J. Simmons, M.Sc. B. Goater, B.Sc, M.LBiol. P. A. Sokoloff, M.Sc, C.Biol.. M.I. Biol.. F.R.E.S. A. J. Halstead. M.Sc. F.R.E.S. T. R. E. Southwood. K. B.. D.Sc. F.R.E.S. R. D. Hawkins. M.A. R. W. J. Uffen. M.Sc, F.R.E.S. P. J. Hodae B. K. West, B.Ed. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History is published by the British Entomological and Natural History Society, Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst. Reading, Berkshire RGIO OTH. UK. Tel: 01734-321402. The Journal is distributed free to BENHS members. CT 1997 British Entomological and Natural History Society. Typeset by Dobbie Typesetting Limited. Tavistock, Devon. Printed in England by Henry Ling Ltd. Dorchester, Dorset. BRITISH ENTOMOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Registered charity number: 213149 Meetings of the Society are held regularly in London, at the rooms of the Royal Entomological Society, 41 Queen's Gate, London SW7 and the well-known ANNUAL EXHIBITION is planned for Saturday 25 October 1997 at Imperial College, London SW7.
  • Lepidoptera; Coleophoridae) 1Sibyl Bucheli, 2Jean-François Landry and 1John Wenzel 1Dept

    Lepidoptera; Coleophoridae) 1Sibyl Bucheli, 2Jean-François Landry and 1John Wenzel 1Dept

    Larval case architecture ♦ 77 Larval case architecture and implications of host-plant associations for North American Coleophora (Lepidoptera; Coleophoridae) 1Sibyl Bucheli, 2Jean-François Landry and 1John Wenzel 1Dept. of Entomology, Museum of Biological Diversity, The Ohio State University 2Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Introduction noxious secondary chemicals of a particular plant may be pre-adapted to digest the same or very similar chemicals of Plant-insect herbivore relationships are difficult to novel unrelated plants. Colonization of host-plants based on quantify because each lineage is under many selective plant chemical cues, or resource tracking, may produce very pressures, including the pressures supplied by each similar cladograms (Jermy, 1976; Mitter and Brooks, 1983; other. Cladistic methods provide a means to examine Miller and Wenzel, 1995). In resource tracking, host-plant coevolutionary situations empirically. cladogenesis takes place prior to and independent of insect Mitter and Brooks (1983) set the standard for phylogenetic cladogenesis. Insects subsequently colonize plants that analysis of coevolutionary events by constructing produce particular chemicals. The plants colonized may have phylogenies of the insects and their host-plants and similar chemicals because of either phylogenetic relatedness comparing the two cladograms to ascertain the level of or through convergent evolution. Sequential evolution may coevolution. Two expectations must be met to argue that be much more common than nearly simultaneous coevolution a host-plant and its herbivore have undergone reciprocal in the sense of Ehrlich and Raven (Jermy, 1976; Miller and evolution: (1) there must be a nonrandom fit overall to Wenzel, 1995). association by descent (the overall branching patterns of Janz and Nylin (1998) reconsidered the relationship the cladograms must be congruent), and (2) derivations between angiosperms and butterflies in light of the Chase et al.
  • Proceedings of the Russian Entomological Society. Vol. 85(2)

    Proceedings of the Russian Entomological Society. Vol. 85(2)

    РОССИЙСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК ТРУДЫ РУССКОГО ЭНТОМОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ОБЩЕСТВА Том 85(2) Санкт-Петербург 2014 Труды Русского энтомологического общества. Т. 85(2). Санкт-Петербург, 2014. 79 с. Proceedings of the Russian Entomological Society. Vol. 85(2). St Petersburg, 2014. 79 pp. Данный выпуск Трудов посвящен 25-летней годовщине создания Саратов- ского отделения РЭО и включает научные статьи членов этого отделения, отра- жающие основные направления их исследований. Все опубликованные материалы прошли независимое научное рецензирование. RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PROCEEDINGS OF THE RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Vol. 85(2) Edited by V.A. Krivokhatsky Editorial board of the volume: V.V. Anikin, S.A. Belokobylskij Редактор издания – В.А. Кривохатский Редакционная коллегия тома: В.В. Аникин, С.А. Белокобыльский Русское энтомологическое общество, 2014 Зоологический институт РАН, 2014 Санкт-Петербургский государственный лесотехнический университет, 2014 ЭНТОМОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ НА НИЖНЕЙ ВОЛГЕ ENTOMOOGICAL RESEARCHES ON THE LOWER VOLGA Труды Русского энтомологического общества. С.-Петербург, 2014. Т. 85(2): 5–7. Proceedings of the Russian Entomological Society. St Petersburg, 2014. Vol. 85(2): 5–7. К 25-летию Саратовского отделения Русского энтомологического общества В.В. Аникин To the twenty-fifth anniversary of Saratov Branch of the Russian Entomological Society V.V. Anikin Саратовский государственный университет им. Н.Г. Чернышевского, ул. Астраханская, 83, Саратов 410012, Россия. E-mal: [email protected] Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya st., 83, Saratov 410012, Russia. Emal: [email protected] Резюме. Рассмотрены основные результаты 25-летнего существования и деятельности Саратов- ского отделения Русского энтомологического общества. Ключевые слова. Энтомология, общество, отделение, результаты, сложности. Abstract. The main results of the 25 years existence and activity of Saratov branch of the Russian Ento- mological Society was considered.

  • Entomologiske Meddelelser

    Entomologiske Meddelelser BIND 58 KØBENHAVN 1990 Indhold - Contents Buh!, 0., P. Falck, O. Karsholt, K. Larsen & K. Schnack: Fund af småsommerfugle fra Danmark i 1988 (Lepidoptera) Records oj Microlepidopterajrom Denmark in 1988 ............................... 33 Breiting, S., J. Jørgensen & K. Schnack: Projekt »Danske Dyrenavne« Project Danish Common Names of Invertebrates .................................. 65 Hansen, M.: De danske arter af slægten Sphaeridium Fabricius (Coleoptera, H ydrophilidae) The Danish species ofSphaeridium Fabricius .................................. 59 Hansen, M., V. Mahler, E. Palm & O. Vagtholm-Jensen: Ottende tillæg tiL» Forteg­ nelse over Danmarks Biller« (Coleoptera) Eighth supplement to the list of Danish Coleoptera . 11 Johannesen, P.: Observationer af sommerfugle i Syd- og Sydvestgrønland (Lepi­ doptera) Observations on Lepidoptera in South and Southwest Greenland . ..................... Kristensen, N. P.: Torben W. Langer 1924-1988 .............................. 95 Nielsen, B. Overgaard: Phoresy of Cervicola meyeri (Taschenb.) on Aedes communis (Deg.) (Mallophaga: Ischnocera & Diptera: Culicidae) ....................... 43 Palm, E.: Otiorhynchus crataegi Germar, 1824 fundet i Danmark (Coleoptera, Curcu­ lionidae) Otiorhynchus crataegi Germar, 1824 Jound in Denmark . 9 Pedersen, J.: Meligethes symphyti (Heer) - en ny dansk glimmerbøsse (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) Meligethes symphyti (Heer)- a new Danish species of Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) ........ 30 Runge, J. B.: Ceutorhynchus parvulus Brisout, 1869, en