DOCSLIB.ORG

Gas Chromatography with Pulsed Flame Photometric Detection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PODHORNIAK ET AL.: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 84, NO. 3, 2001 873 RESIDUES AND TRACE ELEMENTS Gas Chromatography with Pulsed Flame Photometric Detection Multiresidue Method for Organophosphate Pesticide and Metabolite Residues at the Parts-Per-Billion Level in Representative Commodities of Fruit and Vegetable Crop Groups LYNDA V. PODHORNIAK,JUAN F. NEGRON, and FRANCIS D. GRIFFITH,JR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Biological and Economic Analysis Division, Analytical Chemistry Branch, 701 Mapes Rd, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-5350 A gas chromatographic method with a pulsed reassess all food and feed tolerances according to the new flame photometric detector (P–FPD) is presented standards. To satisfy the new requirements of FQPA, EPA for the analysis of 28 parent organophosphate (OP) must conduct risk assessment including aggregate exposure pesticides and their OP metabolites. A total of from various sources and cumulative exposure from related 57 organophosphates were analyzed in 10 repre- chemical(s), which share a common mechanism of toxicity. sentative fruit and vegetable crop groups. The To properly conduct these risk assessments, EPA needs method is based on a judicious selection of known more pesticide residue data at lower levels. While the U.S. procedures from FDA sources such as the Pesti- Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently provides pes- cide Analytical Manual and Laboratory Information ticide residue data to EPA, the amendments contained in Bulletins, combined in a manner to recover the FQPA require more detailed risk assessment, which in turn re- OPs and their metabolite(s) at the part-per-billion quire more data on residues at lower levels than routinely re- (ppb) level. The method uses an acetone extraction ported from FDA compliance monitoring samples. This multi with either miniaturized Hydromatrix column parti- residue method was developed as part of EPA’s senior man- tioning or alternately a miniaturized methylene agement commitment to provide the tools to FDA to generate dichloride liquid–liquid partitioning, followed by the necessary pesticide data in a timely manner. solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanup with Because the organophosphate (OP) pesticides and their graphitized carbon black (GCB) and PSA car- metabolites are the Agency’s top priority chemicals, our pro- tridges. Determination of residues is by pro- posed method identifies EPA’s top priority grammed temperature capillary column gas chro- 15 organophosphate pesticides and their metabolites as well as matography fitted with a P–FPD set in the the 13 high priority organophosphate pesticides and their me- phosphorus mode. The method is designed so that tabolites. The top priority OPs include azinphos-methyl and a set of samples can be prepared in 1 working day its oxon, chlorpyrifos and its oxon, coumaphos and its oxon, for overnight instrumental analysis. The recovery dichlorvos, dimethoate and its oxon, dioxathion, diazinon and data indicates that a daily column-cutting proce- its oxon and hydroxy metabolites, ethion and its monooxon, dure used in combination with the SPE extract fenthion and its oxon, sulfoxide, and sulfone metabolites, mal- cleanup effectively reduces matrix enhancement at athion and its oxon, naled, phosmet and its oxon, the ppb level for many organophosphates. The pirimiphos-methyl, trichlorfon, and tetrachlorvinphos. The OPs most susceptible to elevated recoveries high priority OPs include acephate, methamidophos, around or greater than 150%, based on peak area chlorpyrifos-methyl and its oxon, fenamiphos and its calculations, were trichlorfon, phosmet, and the sulfoxide, sulfone, and desisopropyl metabolites, isofenfos metabolites of dimethoate, fenamiphos, fenthion, and its oxon and desisopropyl metabolites, methidathion, and phorate. oxydemeton-methyl, parathion and its oxon, methyl parathion and its oxon, phorate and its oxon, sulfoxide, and sulfone me- tabolites, profenofos, tribufos, and sulprofos and its oxon, he Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) amended the sulfoxide, and sulfone metabolites. This new method will de- Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act termine the magnitude of the OP residues to the Tand the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, establishing 1 part-per-billion (ppb) level, with the limit of detection more stringent standards for pesticides in foods and feeds. It (LOD) almost an order of magnitude lower for fruits and veg- required the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to etables that were selected for this study. Commodities chosen for this project include primary food Received August 28, 2000. Accepted by JS December 22, 2000. items in the diets of infants and children such as apples, or- 874 PODHORNIAK ET AL.: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 84, NO. 3, 2001 Figure 1. P–FPD chromatograms of 57 organophosphates subdivided into 4 mixed analytical standards showing the sensitivity of the P–FPD. PODHORNIAK ET AL.: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 84, NO. 3, 2001 875 Figure 2. Flow chart of Hydromatrix partition. 876 PODHORNIAK ET AL.: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 84, NO. 3, 2001 Figure 3. Flow chart of liquid–liquid partition. PODHORNIAK ET AL.: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 84, NO. 3, 2001 877 anges, head lettuce, peaches, carrots, blackberries, and toma- Sartorius Research Model R160D (Brinkman Instruments, toes. Each of these crops is a representative commodity of a Westbury, NY), or equivalent. major food crop group as defined in 40 CFR 180.34. It is an- (o) TurboVap.—Closed cell concentrator, 500 and ticipated that validation of a method for recovery of OPs in the 200 mL (Zymark Corp., Hopkinton, MA). representative commodities initially validates the method for (p) Vials.—Clear, 2 mL, target DP, P/N 5182-0714 other commodities in the crop group. Method validation data (Hewlett Packard), or equivalent; amber, 2 mL, target, DP were also generated for grapes, cranberries, and strawberries, I-D, P/N 5182-0717 (Hewlett Packard), or equivalent; glass which are not included in any crop grouping. inserts, 250 µL, flat bottom, P/N 5181-3377 (Hewlett Packard), or equivalent. METHOD (q) Vial caps.—Target, DP blue caps, T/RR septa, seal, Apparatus kim snap, PTFE, blue, crimp seal, Teflon/rubber, P/N 5181-1210 (Hewlett Packard), or equivalent; amber snap, Tef- (a) Solid-phase extraction (SPE) col- lon/rubber, P/N 5182-0550 (Hewlett Packard), or equivalent. umns.—SupelcleanTM EnviCarbTM graphitized carbon black (r) Büchner funnel.—Coors, porcelain with fixed perfo- (GCB) SPE columns, 6 mL, 0.5 g, Cat. No. 57094 (Supelco, rated plate, plate diameter 14.5 mm, 64 mm high (Fisher Sci- Bellefonte, PA); primary/secondary amine (PSA) SPE col- entific), or equivalent. umns, 0.5 g, 3 mL, Cat. No. 1210-2042, (BOND ELUT, (s) Sharkskin paper.—11 cm (Schleicher & Schuell, Varian Sample Preparation Products, Harbor City, CA), SPE Keene, NH), or equivalent. vacuum manifold and SPE column adapters (Supelco), or (t) Pipets.—Class A, Pyrex, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5, 6, 7, equivalent. 8, 9, and 10 mL (Fisher Scientific), or equivalent. (b) Gas chromatograph.—HP-6890 (Hewlett Packard, (u) Gases.—He (carrier), high purity grade (Air Products, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a Model 6890 automatic liquid Allentown, PA) or equivalent; H2, high purity grade (Air sampler (ALS) and fitted with a pulsed flame photometric de- Products), or equivalent; air, ultra high purity, zero grade (Air tector Model 5380 in the phosphorus mode (P–FPD) with a Products), or equivalent. Model 5380 detector controller (OI Analytical, College Sta- (v) Gas filters.—Moisture trap. Model 7214 (Alltech As- tion, TX). Gas chromatographic (GC) control and data acqui- sociates, Deerfield, IL) for He and air; gas purifier: high ca- sition by an HP Chem Station (Hewlett Packard) for GC sys- pacity gas purifier Cat. No. 2-3800-U (Supelco), for He; OMI tems, P/N G2070AA, revision A.06.03. indicating purifier, Cat. No. 23906 (Supelco), for He and H2; (c) Printer.—HP Laser Jet 4000 (Hewlett Packard). OMI-2 tube holder, Cat. No. 23921 (Supelco), for He and H2; (d) GC columns.—30 m, 0.25 mm id, 0.25 µm FT DB-1 refillable hydrocarbon and moisture trap, 1/8 in. fitting, Cat. capillary (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA), or equivalent; 30 m, No. 32575-024 (VWR Scientific Products, Philadelphia, PA) µ 0.25 mm id, 0.32 m FT DB-17 capillary (J&W Scientific), or for H2; adsorbent refill activated carbon with molecular sieve µ equivalent; and 15 m, 0.25 mm id, 0.25 m FT DB-1701 cap- 13X, 32575-032 for H2. illary (J&W Scientific), or equivalent. (w) Blender.—Waring, single speed, glass container, (e) Chromatography columns, plain (no frit).—22 mm id Model 700G (Fisher Scientific), or equivalent. × 500 mm with Teflon stopcock, Cat. No. 420530-0244 (x) Food processor.—Robot Coupe Model R 301 Ultra (Kontes, Vineland, NJ), or equivalent. (Robot Coupe USA, Inc., Ridgeland, MS) or equivalent. (f) Centrifuge tubes.—Pyrex, stoppered, conical, glass, (y) Brass sieve.—No. 30. graduated, 15 mL (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA), or equiva- (z) Wire gauze.—40 mesh stainless steel (Jelliff Corp., lent, calibrated to 0.5 or 1.0 mL. South Port, CT). (g) Nitrogen evaporator.—12-Sample nitrogen evapora- (aa) Combustor.—3 mm id P/N 282913 (OI Analytical). tor, 50–55EC, N-Evap-111 (Organomation Associates, Inc., (bb) Optical filter.—Phosphorus, GG-495 yellow, P/N Berlin, MA), or equivalent. 282921 (OI Analytical). (h) Graduated cylinder.—25, 50, and 250 mL, Kimax (cc) High Pressure Merlin Microseal septum.—P/N HP (Fisher Scientific), or equivalent. 5182-3442 (Merlin Instrument Co., Half Moon Bay, CA). (i) Long neck, flat round bottom flask.—500 mL, 24/40, (dd) Ferrules.—Vespel/graphite (90%/10%), 250 µm, Kimax (Fisher Scientific), or equivalent. P/N HP 5181-3323. (j) Separatory funnels.—125 mL; Kontes or equivalent. Reagents (k) Funnels.—Pyrex with fluted bowls, 75 mm top diame- ter, 75 mm stem length (Fisher Scientific), or equivalent.
Recommended publications
  • Novel Approach to Fast Determination of 64 Pesticides Using of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    Novel Approach to Fast Determination of 64 Pesticides Using of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) Tomas Kovalczuk, Ondrej Lacina, Martin Jech, Jan Poustka, Jana Hajslova To cite this version: Tomas Kovalczuk, Ondrej Lacina, Martin Jech, Jan Poustka, Jana Hajslova. Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Food Additives and Contaminants, 2008, 25 (04), pp.444-457. 10.1080/02652030701570156. hal-00577414 HAL Id: hal-00577414 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00577414 Submitted on 17 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Food Additives and Contaminants For Peer Review Only Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) Journal: Food Additives and Contaminants Manuscript ID: TFAC-2007-065.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Research Paper Date Submitted by the 07-Jul-2007 Author: Complete List of Authors:
  • Comments of Teresa Homan with Attachments

    Comments of Teresa Homan with Attachments

    Teresa Homan Watertown, SD 57201 I am a landowner in Deuel County, South Dakota. Our land boarders the Deuel Harvest Wind Project in Deuel county, Docket # EL 18-053. There are 112 towers cited in the project, with 9 towers within a mile of our property. We have spent over three decades developing this property to enhance wildlife and for the enjoyment of our family. Can you imagine how we felt when we found we have a population of eastern bluebirds? We have yellow warblers, which by the way feed on the web worms that form in our trees. We have orioles, cedar waxwings, brown thrashers, rose breasted grosbeaks, gold finches, purple finches, robins, blue jays, nuthatches, eastern kingbirds, bitterns, dark eyed juncos, red winged blackbirds, morning doves, owls, cow birds, northern mocking birds, grey cat birds, wood thrushes, tufted titmouse, king fishers, indigo buntings, scarlet tanagers, bobolinks, meadowlarks, many woodpeckers, turkeys, turkey vultures, even humming birds and bald eagles. There are more, just to numerous to list. Many of these birds we have seen for the first time in our lives on this property in the past 1 O years. Not only are these birds beautiful and fun to watch, they have their purpose in the ecosystem. We also see northern long eared bats, that are on the endangered list in South Dakota. These birds are making a come back after the use of insecticides that nearly wiped out many. In the 1940's the insecticide DDT was introduced for public use, it is now banned from sale. In 1976 the herbicide Roundup was introduced to the public.
  • Review of the Mammalian Toxicology

    Review of the Mammalian Toxicology

    REVIEW OF THE MAMMALIAN TOXICOLOGY AND METABOLISM/TOXICOKINETICS OF FENTHION The APVMA Review of Fenthion © Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority 2012 ISBN 978-0-9873591-5-5 (electronic) This document was originally published in 2005 as part of the preliminary review findings report for Part 1 of the fenthion review. It was subsequently updated in 2007, and revised in 2008. Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. This is a standard form agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. The APVMA’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any approved material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Licensed from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. This report was prepared for the APVMA by the Department of Health and Aging Office of Chemical Safety. In referencing this document the Department of Health and Aging Office of Chemical Safety should be cited as the author and the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority as the publisher and copyright owner.
  • Development of a CEN Standardised Method for Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Accurate Mass Spectrometry

    Development of a CEN Standardised Method for Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Accurate Mass Spectrometry

    Development of a CEN standardised method for liquid chromatography coupled to accurate mass spectrometry CONTENTS 1. Aim and scope ................................................................................................................. 2 2. Short description ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Apparatus and consumables ......................................................................................... 2 4. Chemicals ........................................................................................................................... 2 5. Procedure ........................................................................................................................... 3 5.1. Sample preparation ................................................................................................... 3 5.2. Recovery experiments for method validation ...................................................... 3 5.3. Extraction method ...................................................................................................... 3 5.4. Measurement .............................................................................................................. 3 5.5. Instrumentation and analytical conditions ............................................................ 4 5.5.1. Dionex Ultimate 3000 .......................................................................................... 4 5.5.2. QExactive Focus HESI source parameters .....................................................
  • Comparison of Acute Noaels and Benchmark Doses for Female Brain Cholinesterase Inhibition

    Comparison of Acute Noaels and Benchmark Doses for Female Brain Cholinesterase Inhibition

    Supplemental Material for: February 5-8, 2002 SAP 25 January 2002 Comparison of Acute NOAELs and Benchmark Doses for Female Brain Cholinesterase Inhibition In cumulative risk assessment, it is important to characterize both the time frame for exposure (e.g., What is the exposure duration?) and for the toxic effect (e.g., What are the time to peak effects and the time to recovery?). In the Preliminary Cumulative Risk Assessment of the Organophoshate Pesticides (OPs) relative potency factors (RPFs) for 29 chemicals and points of departure (PODs) and the index chemical were determined based on whole brain cholinesterase (ChE) data from toxicity studies of 21 days and longer. The Office of Pesticide Programs has argued that the use of steady state data for relative potency determination generates relative potency factors (RPFs) that are reproducible and reflect less variability than RPFs derived from single-dose or short-term studies where the extent of inhibition changes rapidly immediately following dosing. OPP has posed a question to the FIFRA SAP for the February 5-8, 2002 review concerning how best to evaluate risk, taking into account the temporal characteristics of the hazard endpoint (i.e., cholinesterase inhibition) and the temporal characteristics of the exposure patterns for the food, drinking water, and residential/nonoccupational pathways. In order to facilitate the panel discussion, a table listing the available single dose toxicity studies performed with OPs has been made. Most of the studies are acute neurotoxicity (ACN) studies (OPPT Guideline 870.6200, OPP Guideline 81-8) administered by gavage. Acute lethality studies were not included. Dose levels, no- observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs), and no-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs) for female brain ChE are also listed in the table.
  • For Methyl Parathion

    For Methyl Parathion

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 2006 SUBJECT: Finalization of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) and Interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for the Organophosphate Pesticides, and Completion of the Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration Eligibility Process for the Organophosphate Pesticides FROM: Debra Edwards, Director Special Review and Reregistration Division Office of Pesticide Programs TO: Jim Jones, Director Office of Pesticide Programs As you know, EPA has completed its assessment of the cumulative risks from the organophosphate (OP) class of pesticides as required by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. In addition, the individual OPs have also been subject to review through the individual- chemical review process. The Agency’s review of individual OPs has resulted in the issuance of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) for 22 OPs, interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for 8 OPs, and a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for one OP, malathion.1 These 31 OPs are listed in Appendix A. EPA has concluded, after completing its assessment of the cumulative risks associated with exposures to all of the OPs, that: (1) the pesticides covered by the IREDs that were pending the results of the OP cumulative assessment (listed in Attachment A) are indeed eligible for reregistration; and 1 Malathion is included in the OP cumulative assessment. However, the Agency has issued a RED for malathion, rather than an IRED, because the decision was signed on the same day as the completion of the OP cumulative assessment.
  • EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water with Direct Aqueous Injection LC/MS/MS

    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water with Direct Aqueous Injection LC/MS/MS

    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water with Direct Aqueous Injection LC/MS/MS E. Michael Thurman and Imma Ferrer Center for Environmental Mass Spectrometry University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA Confidentiality Label 1 March 20, 2012 Abstract EPA Method 538 is a new method from EPA for organophosphate pesticides in drinking water. It uses direct aqueous injection; thus, no sample preparation is needed. We use both UHPLC (Agilent 1290) and MS/MS (Agilent 6460) analysis for rapid analysis and sensitive detection with ng/L limits of detection. A second MRM is added for more reliable identification. Confidentiality Label 2 March 20, 2012 Hypothesis Direct injection of organophosphate pesticides (EPA Method 538) will work by UHPLC (Agilent Model 1290) and LC/MS/MS with Jetstream (Agilent Model 6460) with trace level detection at ng/L concentrations. Confidentiality Label 3 March 20, 2012 1. Introduction-Summary 1.1 EPA Method 538 (published in November 2009 by Shoemaker) deals with Organophosphate pesticides in drinking water (1) and one other contaminant, quinoline. 1.2 The method consists of 10 compounds: acephate, aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, dicrotophos, diisopropylmethylphosphonate (DIMP), fenamiphos sulfone, fenamiphos sulfoxide, methamidophos, oxydemeton methyl, quinoline, and thiofanox with 5 labeled internal standards. 1.3 Direct aqueous injection is used with a large volume sample of 100 microliters; thus, no sample preparation is needed. 1.4 Because solid phase extraction (i.e. concentration of the sample is not carried out) suppression is mimimized in the analysis. 1.5 Part-per-Trillion Detection Limits. Confidentiality Label 4 March 20, 2012 Introduction 1.1: EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Direct Aqueous Injection by Jody Shoemaker, EPA Cincinnati, OH [email protected] 513-569-7298 Confidentiality Label 5 March 20, 2012 Introduction: 1.2.
  • EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Aqueous Direct Injection and LC/MS/MS Summar

    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Aqueous Direct Injection and LC/MS/MS Summar

    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Aqueous Direct Injection and LC/MS/MS UCT Part Numbers: SLAQ100ID21-3UM - Selectra® Aqueous C18, 100 x 2.1mm, 3µm SLAQGDC20-3UM - Selectra® Aqueous C18, Guard column, 10 x 2.0mm, 3µm SLGRDHLDR - Guard Cartridge Holder June 2015 Summary: This application outlines a direct aqueous injection-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (DAI-LC/MS/MS) method for the determination of 11 selected organic contaminants in drinking water, including methamidophos, acephate, aldicarb sulfoxide, oxydemeton methyl, dicrotophos, aldicarb, diisopropyl methylphosphonate (DIMP), fenamiphos sulfone, fenamiphos sulfoxide, thiofanox, and quinoline [1]. Dicrotophos, oxydemeton methyl, methamidophos, and acephate are UCMR4 compounds. An Aqueous C18 HPLC column was utilized for analyte retention and separation. Calibration curves were constructed using calibration standards prepared in reagent water with preservative reagents for analyte quantitation. The responses were linear over the entire analytical ranges (R2 ≥ 0.9970). Excellent accuracy (90 - 111%) and precision (RSD% < 20%, n=7) were achieved for fortified reagent water and tap water samples. Procedure: 1. Preserve drinking water sample with 64 mg/L of sodium omadine (antimicrobial) and 1.5 g/L of ammonium acetate (binding free chlorine). 2. Mix 0.99 mL of the preserved water sample with 10 μL of 0.4-12.5 ng/μL internal standard mixture, and vortex for 30 sec. 3. Inject 50 μL onto LC/MS/MS equipped with an aqueous
  • Organophosphate Poisoning : a Review

    Organophosphate Poisoning : a Review

    120 Sinha and Sharma Med J Indones Organophosphate poisoning : A review Parmod K. Sinha, Ashok Sharma Abstrak Pestisida organofosfat digunakan secara luas di seluruh dunia. Keracunan oleh bahan ini merupakan masalah kesehatan masyarakat, terutama di negara berkembang. Zat neurotoksik organofosfat merupakan bahan yang dianggap mengancam dalam bidang militer dan terorisme. Mekanisme toksisitas bahan ini adalah dengan cara menghambat asetilkolinesterase yang mengakibatkan menumpuknya neurotransmitor asetilkolin dan terjadi rangsangan terus-menerus pada reseptor asetilkolin pada sistem saraf sentral maupun perifer. Selain krisis kolinergik, organofosfat dapat menimbulkan berbagai sindrom neurologis, baik akut maupun kronik. Sedangkan gejala peralihan ( intermediate) terjadi 1-4 hari setelah krisis kolinergik teratasi. Pengobatan standar terdiri dari reaktivasi asetilkolinesterase dengan antidot golongan oksim (prolidoksim, oksidoksime, HI-6 dan HLo7), dan pengendalian efek biokimia asetilkolin dengan menggunakan atropin. Golongan oksim yang baru HI-6 dan Hlo7 merupakan reaktivator asetilkolinesterase yang lebih cocok dan efektif untuk keracunan akut dan berat dibandingkan dengan prolidoksim dan obidoksim. Penderita yang mendapat pengobatan segera, biasanya dapat sembuh dari toksisitas akut, namun gejala neurologis ikutan dapat saja terjadi. (Med J Indones 2003; 12: 120-6) Abstract Organophosphate pesticides are used extensively worldwide, and poisoning by these agents, particularly in developing nations is a public health problem. Organophosphorous
  • Crystal Structures of Oxime-Bound Fenamiphos

    Crystal Structures of Oxime-Bound Fenamiphos

    Crystal structures of oxime-bound fenamiphos-acetylcholinesterases: reactivation involving flipping of the His447 ring to form a reactive Glu334-His447-Oxime triad Andreas Hörnberg, Elisabet Artursson, Rikard Wärme, Yuan-Ping Pang, Fredrik Ekström To cite this version: Andreas Hörnberg, Elisabet Artursson, Rikard Wärme, Yuan-Ping Pang, Fredrik Ekström. Crys- tal structures of oxime-bound fenamiphos-acetylcholinesterases: reactivation involving flipping of the His447 ring to form a reactive Glu334-His447-Oxime triad. Biochemical Pharmacology, Elsevier, 2009, 79 (3), pp.507. 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.08.027. hal-00538094 HAL Id: hal-00538094 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00538094 Submitted on 21 Nov 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Title: Crystal structures of oxime-bound fenamiphos-acetylcholinesterases: reactivation involving flipping of the His447 ring to form a reactive Glu334-His447-Oxime triad Authors: Andreas Hornberg,¨ Elisabet Artursson, Rikard Warme,¨ Yuan-Ping Pang, Fredrik Ekstrom¨ PII: S0006-2952(09)00730-8
  • Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 the CONCEPT and IMPLEMENTATION of CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS

    Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 the CONCEPT and IMPLEMENTATION of CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS

    Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco CORESTA GUIDE N° 1 The Concept and Implementation of CPA Guidance Residue Levels October 2020 Agro-Chemical Advisory Committee CORESTA TECHNICAL GUIDE N° 1 Title: The Concept and Implementation of CPA Guidance Residue Levels Status: Valid Note: This document will be periodically reviewed by CORESTA Document history: Date of review Information July 2003 Version 1 GRL for Pyrethrins () and Terbufos corrected. December 2003 CPA terminology corrected. June 2008 Version 2 – GRLs revised and residue definitions added Provisional GRL of 2.00 ppm for Cyfluthrin to replace previous June 2010 GRL of 0.50 ppm July 2013 Version 3 – GRLs revised October 2013 Note for Maleic Hydrazide revised Version 4 – GRLs revised + clarification that scope of GRLs July 2016 applies predominantly to the production of traditional cigarette tobaccos and GAP associated with their cultivation. June 2018 Fluopyram GRL of 5 ppm added to GRL list Version 5 – Nine new CPAs with GRL added to list. November 2019 Revision of GRLs for Chlorantraniliprole and Indoxacarb. Updated web links. October 2020 Version 6 – Flupyradifurone GRL of 21 ppm added to GRL list. CORESTA Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 THE CONCEPT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS Executive Summary • Guidance Residue Levels (GRLs) are in the remit of the Agro-Chemical Advisory Committee (ACAC) of CORESTA. Their development is a joint activity of all ACAC members, who represent the leaf production, processing and manufacturing sectors of the Tobacco Industry. The concept of GRLs and their implementation are described in this guide. • GRLs provide guidance to tobacco growers and assist with interpretation and evaluation of results from analyses of residues of Crop Protection Agents (CPAs*).
  • 2018 Treated Water Undetected Chemical Contaminant List

    2018 Treated Water Undetected Chemical Contaminant List

    2018 Treated Water Undetected Chemical Contaminant List ESTROGENS AND OTHER HORMONES Diethylstilbestrol (DES) Estrone 17alpha-Estradiol 17alpha-Ethynal estradiol 17beta-Estradiol Progesterone Estriol cis-Testosterone trans-Testosterone INORGANIC CHEMICALS Antimony Niobium Arsenic Osmium Beryllium Palladium Cadmium Platinum Cerium Praseodymium Cesium Rhenium Cobalt Rhodium Cyanide Ruthenium Dysprosium Samarium Erbium Selenium Europium Silver Gadolinium Tantalum Gallium Tellurium Germanium Thallium Gold Thorium Hafnium Thulium Holmium Tin Iridium Titanium Lanthanum Tungsten Lead Uranium Lutetium Vanadium Mercury Ytterbium Molybdenum Zinc Neodymium Zirconium Nickel NITROSAMINES N-Nitropyrrolidine (NPYR) N-Nitrosomorpholine (NMOR) N-Nitrosodi-N-butylamine (NDBA) N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (NDPhA) N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) N-Nitrosodi-N-propylamine (NDPA) N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) N-Nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA) N-Nitrosopiperidine (NPIP) 1 ORGANIC CHEMICALS Acenaphthene Butylbenzylphthalate Acenaphthylene Butyraldehyde (Butanal) Acetaldehyde Carbaryl Acetochlor Carbofuran Acetone Carbon disulfide Acrylamide Carbophenothion Acrylonitrile Carbon tetrachloride Alachlor Carboxin Aldicarb (Temik) Chlordane Aldicarb sulfone Chlordane, alpha Aldicarb sulfoxide Chlordane, gamma Aldrin Chlorfenvinphos Allyl chloride Chloroacetonitrile Tert-Amyl Methyl ether Chlorobenzene Ametryn Chlorobenzilate Anilizine 2-Chlorobiphenyl Anthracene 1-Chlorobutane Aspon Chloroethane Atraton Chloromethane Atrazine Chloroneb Azinphos-ethyl Chloroprene Azinphos-methyl