DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAINING of OFFICERS CANDIDATES CE.S Si ARMY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAINING of OFFICERS CANDIDATES CE.S Si ARMY DRAINING Of OFFICERS CANDIDATES CE.S Si ARMY GROUND FORCES STUDY HO. 31 IISACGSC LIBRARY 1i tfrmiftf TRAINING OF OFFICERS CANDIDATES IN A G F SPECIAL TRAINING SCHOOLS Study No. 31 this dots ("Fiic Sif^ ' 1*7 $0 Historical Section . Army Ground Forces 1946 19 NwV ; S ' LLl*« AJLtiii The Army Ground Forces TRAINING OF OFFICER CANDIDATES IN AGF SPECIAL SERVICE SCHOOLS Study No, 31 By Major William R. Keast Historical Section - Army Ground Forces 1946 B E 3 T E I fc T'E D HEADQUAETERS ARMY GROUND FOECES WASHINGTON 25, D, C. 31^.7(1 Sept 19^o)GNHIS 1 September 19^5 SUBJECT: Studies in the History of Aimy Ground. Forces TO: All Interested Agencies 1. The hist017 of the Array Ground Forces as a command was prepared during the course of the war and completed immediately thereafter. The studies prepared in Headquarters Anny Ground Forces,'were written "by professional historians, three of whom served as commissioned officers, and one as a civilian. The histories of the subordinate commands were prepared by historical officers, who except iii Second Army, acted as such in addition to other duties. 2. From, the first, the histoiy was designed primarily for the Army. Its object is to give an account of what was done from the point of view of the command preparing the histoiy, including a candid, and factual account of difficulties, mistakes recognized as such, the means by which, in the opinion of those concerned, they might have been avoided, the measures used to overcome them, and the effectiveness of such measures. The histoiy is not intended to be laudatory. 3. The history of the Army Ground Forces is composed of monographs on the subjects selected, and of two volumes in which an overall history is presented. A separate volume is devoted to the activities of each of the major subordinate commands. k. In order that the studies may be made available to interested agencies at the earliest possible date, they are being reproduced and distributed in manuscript foim. As such they must be regarded as drafts, subject to final editing tod revision. Persons finding errors of fact or important amissions are encouraged to communicate with the Commanding General, Army Ground Forces, Attention: Historical Section, in order that corrections may be made prior to publication in printed form by the War Department. BY COMMAND OF GENERAL DEVERS: (J. L. TARE Colonel, AGD 1 Incl: Acting Ground Adj General Historical Study CONTENTS Page Prefatory Note Mission 1 Selection of Candidates 2 Operation of Officer Candidate Schools 3 Academic Training 3 Training in Leadership 6 Selection for Commissions 7 Selection and Training of Tactical Officers 11 Factors Eelated to Success and Failure in OC School 13 AGCT Scores 15 Age 16 Source 16 Principal Changes in the Officer Candidate Program 18 Palliatives for Low Quality in 19^2 18 Preparatory Schools 19 The Turnback Policy 20 Eevision of the OCS Program in 19^3 22 Extension of the OCS Course to Seventeen Weeks} 19^3 23 Proposals for a Six-Month OCS Course 2k Consolidation of the Armored, Cavalry, and Tank Destroyer Officer Candidate Schools. 26 RESTRICTED TABLES Table I: Annual Output of AGS' Officers Candidate Schools Table II: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Antiaircraft Artillery School Table HI: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Armored School Table IV: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Cavalry School Table Y: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Coast Artillery School Table YI: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Field Artillery School Table YII: Graduation and Failure of Gffioer Candidates, Infantry School Table YIII: Graduation and Failure of Officer Candidates, Tank Destroyer School RESTRICTED RESTRICTED PREFATORY NOTE Stud^r No. 6, The Procurement and Branch Distribution of Officers, deals with quantitative aspects of the officer problem. In particular^ that study discusses the control and admini strati on of officer candidate schools; the determination of school capacities and quotas, and the adjustment of OCS operations to requirements for offi­ cers at home and overseas. The question of the training of officer candidates in the special service schools, excluded from Study No, 6, is discussed in the following page el In particular, this section describes the sytem used in training and selecting officer candidates in the service schools and traces the major changes in the system after the assumption of control over officer candidate training "by Army Ground Forces in March 19^2. To separate a discussion of training from a discussion of personnel procurement and assignment is artificial, since the nature and success of any training program is largely determined by the number and quality of men to whom it is administered. Espe­ cially is this the case in officer candidate training. For, as will be shown in great­ er detail below, the officer candidate schools occupied a peculiar position in being at once agencies of training and agencies of selection. They were an integral part of the officer procurement system, not merely institutions to which officers were sent for training after being commissioned. Having a vital role to perform in the selection process, the officer candidate schools were more sensitive than other elements of the school gystem to changes in the quality of students resulting from fluctuations in de­ mand. When demand was high, as in 19^2 and 19W, quotas could be filled only by lower­ ing standards and admitting candidates of Inferior quality. In the schools closer ob­ servation and more careful screening became necessary to prevent the commissioning of incompetent officers. Yet the schools were under great pressure during such periods to commission as many men as possible. Training suffered, failures increased, and the number of men turned back to repeat all or part of the course mounted. "When demand for officers was low, as In 19^1 and 19*1-3, more rigorous selection could be practiced in units. Men sent to officer candidate schools were consequently of higher quality. At the same time pressure to maintain a large volume of output was relaxed. The schools were then freer to concentrate on training, the increased success of which was attested by higiher graduation rates during these periods. In view of the role of officer candidate schools in the officer procurement system it is not surprising that most of the developments in the training system traced on pp. 35-53 below had their origin and justification in episodes in the history of officer procurement. The present study should be read in connection with Study No. 6. This study was prepared in the Historical Section, Headquarters, Army Ground Forces, by Major William R. Eeast, in consultation with the officers cited in the notes. RESTRICTED RESTRICTED TRAINING OF OFFICER CANDIDATES IN AGF SPECIAL SERVICE SCHOOLS MibBion The mission of officer candidate schools of the Army Ground Forces (AGE) was to convert enlisted men into combat officers to meet mobilization requirements for com­ missioned personnel in the company grades, in excess of the supply available in the Regular Army and the reserve components. In courses conducted at each AGF service school, originally twelve or thirteen and later seventeen weeks long, enlisted men and warrant officers were trained in the "basic duties of a junior officer of the arm, screened for the possession of leadership and other traits desirable in an officer, and, if qualified, commissioned second lieutenants in the Army of the United States. •Officer candidate training was a mobilization procedure. Production of officers in peacetime was limited to the Military Academy, the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (RGTC), and extension courses for Regular Army enlisted men at service schools. From these sources it was anticipated that enough officers would be available to meet the requirements of the first 120 days of mobilization. Thereafter, additions to officer strength were to come -- except for civilian specialists commissioned directly in tt numbers -- from the officer candidate schools (OCS), whose operations were to have b§- gun on M-Day. Plans for officer candidate training were embodied in Mobilization Regulations and in mobilization plans drawn up before 19^0.1 Mobilization plans in 1938, for ex­ ample, called for 225,000 officers during the first year of mobilization, to command an Army of 3,000,000. Of these officers, 128,000 — Regular, Reserve, and National Guard — were expected to be available on M-Day. The officer candidate schools were to supply the remainder, training monthly increments varying from 25,000 to 1,500 during the first nine months and none thereafter.^ Mobilization of the Army after 1940 did not proceed according to the time scheme envisaged in prewar plans. Initially mobilization was much slower, after December 19^1 much faster and more complete, than had been anticipated. As a result, requirements for officers in excess of those who could be supplied from the Regular Army the reserve components did not appear until quite late. Large-scale officer candidate training was deferred, as a consequence, until the beginning of 19^2, by which time the Army had attained a strength of approximately 1,600,000 men.3 By 1 January 19^2 only 1,389 officer candidates had been commissioned in the ground arms; during 19^2 mobilization was very much more rapid and extensive than had been anticipated, and the officer candidate schools were forced to expand to unforeseen heights, producing 55,000 officers in the ground arms alone. By the end of 19^3, with mobilization virtually complete, while approximately 215,000 Regular, Reserve, Na­ tional Guard officers were on duty in the Army as a whole, and about 100,0.00'had been commissioned directly from civilian life, nearly 300,000 had been commissioned at offi­ cer candidate schools.4 Thus the officer candidate schools came ultimately to perform their Intended function of filling the gap between officer requirements and supply available from other sources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joseph Warren Stilwell Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf958006qb Online items available Register of the Joseph Warren Stilwell papers Finding aid prepared by Aparna Mukherjee, revised by Lyalya Kharitonova Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2003, 2014, 2015, 2017 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Joseph Warren 51001 1 Stilwell papers Title: Joseph Warren Stilwell papers Date (inclusive): 1889-2010 Collection Number: 51001 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 93 manuscript boxes, 16 oversize boxes, 1 cubic foot box, 4 album boxes, 4 boxes of slides, 7 envelopes, 1 oversize folder, 3 sound cassettes, sound discs, maps and charts, memorabilia(57.4 Linear Feet) Abstract: Diaries, correspondence, radiograms, memoranda, reports, military orders, writings, annotated maps, clippings, printed matter, sound recordings, and photographs relating to the political development of China, the Sino-Japanese War of 1937-1945, and the China-Burma-India Theater during World War II. Includes some subsequent Stilwell family papers. World War II diaries also available on microfilm (3 reels). Transcribed copies of the diaries are available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org Creator: Stilwell, Joseph Warren, 1883-1946 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access Boxes 36-38 and 40 may only be used one folder at a time. Box 39 closed; microfilm use copy available. Boxes 67, 72-73, 113, and 117 restricted; use copies available in Box 116. The remainder of the collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial
    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S
    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • I4ob11,IZAT ION-RELATED WORLD WAK I1 IYFAN'pry
    GIINNIHG TEAI.1S: i4OB11, IZAT I ON -R E LAT ED CORRELATES OF SIJCCESS IN AMEKICAK WORLD WAK I1 IYFAN'PRY DIVISIONS A thcs.is present.ed to the Faculty of the U. S. Army Command and General Staff College in parti.nl fultillmcnt of t.he requirements for thc degree MASTER OF EIILITARY ART AND SCIENCE JOHN S. BROWN, MA.1, USA B. S., United States Military Academy, 1971 M. I!., Indiana University, 1977 Ph.D., Indiana University, 1983 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1985 Approved for public release; distribution u!ilimi(:etl. MASTERS OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of candidate: Xajor John Sloan Brown Title of Thesis: Winning Teams - - Correlates of Success in American World War I1 Infantr-J Divisions Approved by: -9 Thesis Committee Chairman Dr. Larry A. Ya z7isL4L- , Member, Graduate Faculty Ltc: Michael T. Chase , Member, Consulting Faculty Dr,’,.ilohn W. Partin ill Accepted this 7th day of June 1985 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herin are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the ‘J.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoinq statement.) ABSTRACT W I N N I N G TEAEl S : MOA I L I2AT I ON-RELATED C 0 R K E L A T E S 0 F S U CC E S S IN AMERICAN WORLD WAR TI INFANTRY-CI’IISIONS by Major John Sloan Brown, USA, 195 pages. -Winning Teams identifies characteristics successful American infantry divisions had in common duri.ng World War I1 and the extent to which those Characteristics were unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Defeat at Kasserine: American Armor Doctrine, Training, and Battle Command in Northwest Africa, World War Ii
    DEFEAT AT KASSERINE: AMERICAN ARMOR DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND BATTLE COMMAND IN NORTHWEST AFRICA, WORLD WAR II A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by MARK T. CALHOUN, MAJ, US ARMY B.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, 1988 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2003 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: Major Mark T. Calhoun Thesis Title: Defeat at Kasserine: American Armor Doctrine, Training, and Battle Command in Northwest Africa, World War II Approved by: ______________________________________, Thesis Committee Chair Christopher R. Gabel, Ph.D. ______________________________________, Member Lieutenant Colonel Marlyn R. Pierce, M.A. Accepted this 6th day of June 2003 by: ______________________________________, Director, Graduate Degree Programs Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT DEFEAT AT KASSERINE: AMERICAN ARMOR DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND BATTLE COMMAND IN NORTHWEST AFRICA, WORLD WAR II, by Major Mark T. Calhoun, 97 pages. The 1st Armored Division was the first American armored unit to enter combat against German panzer divisions in World War II. A product of the contentious mechanization process between the First and Second World Wars, the division soon found itself to be outmatched by its German foe.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation COBRA and the Breakout at Normandy From: This Week In
    Photo Credit: USAMHI. Photo Credit: USAMHI. Photo Credit: USAMHI. McNair! This image shows LTG On the Front! This image shows LTG Telling It as He Saw It! This image Leslie J McNair, then commander of Omar Bradley greeting General shows Ernie Pyle, an American war the Army Ground Forces (AGF) , George C Marshall, U. S. Army Chief correspondent. The image depicts Pyle August 18, 1942. General McNair was of Staff, on the ground in Normandy when he was in Italy at the Anzio killed during Operation Cobra when after the succesful assault upon and beachhead, March 18, 1944. Ernie American bombs fell short of the lodgement of Allied forces against Pyle was killed on April 18, 1945 traget. (Personality Photograph Hitler's "Fortress Europe" in June, while reporting on the combat on Ie Collection). 1944.(Personality Photograph Shima, an island off Okinawa. A Collection) . monument to Pyle was erected at the site and reads "At this spot the 77th Infantry Division lost a buddy, Ernie Pyle, 18 April 1945." Operation COBRA and the Breakout at Normandy From: This Week in Army History By: Rick Atkinson; Pulitzer Prize Winning Author Six weeks after the Allied invasion of Normandy, Operation OVERLORD showed distressing signs of stalemate. More than a million American, British, and Canadian troops had come ashore in France by mid-July 1944, but they remained wedged within a narrow bridgehead roughly fifty miles wide and twenty miles deep. Both German defenders and Allied attackers had suffered more than 100,000 casualties; it was small comfort to the Allies that the enemy wounded included Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, commander of Army Group B, who was critically injured in a strafing ambush on July 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower and Ground Armies : Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine
    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Airpower and ground armies : essays on the evolution of Anglo-American air doctrine. 1940- 1943/ editor, Daniel R Mortensen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Air power-Great Britain-History. 2. Air power-United States-History. 3. World War, 1939-1945- Aerial operations, British, 4. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial operations, American. 5. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Africa, North. 6. Operation Torch. I. Mortensen, Daniel R. UG635.G7A89 1998 358.4’03-dc21 97-46744 CIP Digitize December 2002 from 1998 Printing NOTE: Pagination changed Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................... i FORWARD........................................................................................................................ iii ABOUT THE EDITOR .......................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. vi GETTING TOGETHER ......................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Field Expedient Armor Modifications to US Army Armored Vehicles
    FIELD EXPEDIENT ARMOR MODIFICATIONS TO US ARMORED VEHICLES A thesis presented to the Faculty of the US Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by Matthew A. Boal, MAJ, USA (AR) B.A., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 1994 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2006 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: MAJ Matthew A. Boal Thesis Title: Field Expedient Armor Modifications to US Armored Vehicles Approved by: , Thesis Committee Chair Jonathan M. House, Ph.D. , Member Mark T. Gerges, Ph.D. , Member Mr. Louis A. DiMarco, M.A., M.M.A.S. Accepted this 16th day of June 2006 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Programs Robert F. Baumann, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT Field Expedient Armor Modifications to US Armored Vehicles, by MAJ Matthew A. Boal, 103 pages. This thesis examines field expedient modifications to US armored vehicles by US Army and US Marine Corps armored vehicle crewmen during World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Two major categories of modifications are examined. They are modifications to improve the primary protection of armored vehicles and modifications to improve the secondary protection of armored vehicles. Some of the specific types of modifications analyzed are hedgerow cutters, sand bagging, addition or modification of ancillary weapons, communications improvements, camouflage, rocket propelled grenade screens, and addition of concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War
    Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War R EFERENCE I NFORMATION P APER 105 N ATIONAL A RCHIVES AND R ECORDS A DMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC R EVISED 2006 Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War COMPILED BY LISHA B. PENN R EFERENCE I NFORMATION PAPER 105 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC Revised 2006 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records of military agencies relating to African Americans from the post World War I period to the Korean War/compiled by Lisha B. Penn.—Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, revised 2006. 166 p.; 28 cm.—(Reference information paper 105) Includes index. 1. United States—Armed Forces—Afro-Americans—History—20th century— Sources. 2. Afro-American soldiers—History—20th century—Sources. 3. Afro-American sailors—History— 20th century—Sources. I. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. II. Title III. Series 42303670 COVER: “On parade, the 41st Engineers at Ft. Bragg, NC, in color guard ceremony.” Contents Preface . 1 Part I I NTRODUCTION Scope of the Paper . 3 Overview of Pertinent Records . 4 Principles of Arrangement . 5 How to Use This Paper . 5 Acknowledgments . 7 Part II A IR F ORCE C LUSTER RG 18 Records of the Army Air Forces . 8 RG 340 Records of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force. 12 RG 341 Records of Headquarters United States Air Force (Air Staff) . 15 Part III O LD A RMY C LUSTER RG 77 Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers .
    [Show full text]