March Methodology Madness

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

March Methodology Madness The Annual Issue Devoted to Research Methods and Practices ObserverVol. 30, No. 3 March 2017 March Methodology Madness 0 Featuring: R Tools Created by Psychological Scientists and for Psychological Scientists a publication of www.psychologicalscience.org/observer Integrative Science Symposia Our Social Brain: Neurobiology of The Science of Successful Aging The Push and Pull of Values and Human Interactions Chair: Corinna E. Loeckenhoff, Behavior Chair: Piotr Winkielman, Department of Department of Human Development, Chair: Qi Wang, Department of Human Cornell University, USA Development, Cornell University, USA Psychology, University of California, 23-25 March 2017 | Vienna, Austria San Diego, USA Monica Fabiani, Department of Chi-yue Chiu, Department of Christian Keysers, Social Brain Lab, Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Psychology, The Chinese University of Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Champaign, USA Hong Kong, China and Department of Psychology, University Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Department of Heidi Keller, Department of of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Physical Therapy, University of British Psychology, Osnabrück University, Brian D. Knutson, Department of Columbia, Canada Germany Register Today Psychology and Neuroscience, Stanford Denise C. Park, Center for Vital Hazel R. Markus, Department of University, USA Longevity The University of Texas at Psychology, Stanford University, USA Dallas, USA Claus Lamm, Faculty of Psychology, Scott Atran, School of Anthropology Department of Basic Psychological Research Karl A. Pillemer, Department of Human and Museum Ethnography, University and Research Methods University of Vienna, Development, Cornell University, USA of Oxford, United Kingdom KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Austria Walter Mischel, Department of Rebecca Saxe, Department of Brain and Emotions in Context Psychology, Columbia University, USA Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute Chair: Tanja Michael, Department of (Discussant) of Technology, USA Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany In Sync: The Dynamics of Social Who’s In, Who’s Out? Loneliness, Ralph Adolphs, Division of the Coordination Exclusion, and Integration Humanities and Social Sciences, Chair: Antonia Hamilton, Institute California Institute of Technology, USA Chair: Silvia H. Koller, Department of of Cognitive Neuroscience, University Psychology, Universidade Federal do Rio Iris M. Engelhard, Department of College London, United Kingdom Grande do Sul, Brazil Psychology, Utrecht University, Nick Chater, Behavioural Science The Netherlands Taciano L. Milfont, School of Psychology Group, Warwick Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Jeanne L. Tsai, Department of United Kingdom Cognitive Evolution: How Infants Break Genetic and Brain Psychology, Stanford University, USA Frosso Motti-Stefanidi, Department Shaun Gallagher, Department of People Are Animals Too Into Language Diversity in AutismS of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian Frank H. Wilhelm, Department of Philosophy, University of Memphis, USA Linda B. Smith Thomas Bourgeron University of Athens, Greece Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, W. Tecumseh Fitch Marco Iacoboni, Department of University of Salzburg, Austria Department of Cognitive Biology Department of Department of Human Genetics Stacey Sinclair, Department of Psychology, Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria Psychological and Brain Sciences and Cognitive Functions Princeton University, USA Klaus R. Scherer, Department of University of California, Los Angeles, USA Indiana University Bloomington, USA Pasteur Institute, France Psychology, University of Geneva, Alan Teo, Department of Psychiatry and Andrzej Nowak, Department of School of Public Health, Oregon Health Switzerland (Discussant) Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland & Science University, USA and Florida Atlantic University, USA Bridging the Lab and the Real World Natalie Sebanz, Department of Better Minds: Understanding Cognitive Science, Central European Cognitive Enhancement Chair: Gabriella Vigliocco, College University, Hungary Chair: Lorenza S. Colzato, Department of London, United Kingdom Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Karen E. Adolph, Department of University, The Netherlands Psychology, New York University, USA Daphne Bavelier, Department of Emiliano Macaluso, Impact Team, Lyon Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland Neuroscience Research Center, France Arthur F. Kramer, Department of Susan Goldin-Meadow, Department www.icps2017.org Psychology, Northeastern University, USA of Comparative Human Development, E. Glenn Schellenberg, Department of The University of Chicago, USA ICPS SPONSORS Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada Rick Dale, Department of Cognition Ilina Singh, Department of Psychiatry & Information Sciences, University of University of Oxford, United Kingdom California, Merced, USA Dittrich & Partner Consulting GmbH Yvonne Rogers, Department of www.dpc-software.de Computer Science, University College #icps17vie London, United Kingdom Integrative Science Symposia Our Social Brain: Neurobiology of The Science of Successful Aging The Push and Pull of Values and Human Interactions Chair: Corinna E. Loeckenhoff, Behavior Chair: Piotr Winkielman, Department of Department of Human Development, Chair: Qi Wang, Department of Human Cornell University, USA Development, Cornell University, USA Psychology, University of California, 23-25 March 2017 | Vienna, Austria San Diego, USA Monica Fabiani, Department of Chi-yue Chiu, Department of Christian Keysers, Social Brain Lab, Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Psychology, The Chinese University of Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Champaign, USA Hong Kong, China and Department of Psychology, University Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Department of Heidi Keller, Department of of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Physical Therapy, University of British Psychology, Osnabrück University, Brian D. Knutson, Department of Columbia, Canada Germany Register Today Psychology and Neuroscience, Stanford Denise C. Park, Center for Vital Hazel R. Markus, Department of University, USA Longevity The University of Texas at Psychology, Stanford University, USA Dallas, USA Claus Lamm, Faculty of Psychology, Scott Atran, School of Anthropology Department of Basic Psychological Research Karl A. Pillemer, Department of Human and Museum Ethnography, University and Research Methods University of Vienna, Development, Cornell University, USA of Oxford, United Kingdom KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Austria Walter Mischel, Department of Rebecca Saxe, Department of Brain and Emotions in Context Psychology, Columbia University, USA Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute Chair: Tanja Michael, Department of (Discussant) of Technology, USA Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany In Sync: The Dynamics of Social Who’s In, Who’s Out? Loneliness, Ralph Adolphs, Division of the Coordination Exclusion, and Integration Humanities and Social Sciences, Chair: Antonia Hamilton, Institute California Institute of Technology, USA Chair: Silvia H. Koller, Department of of Cognitive Neuroscience, University Psychology, Universidade Federal do Rio Iris M. Engelhard, Department of College London, United Kingdom Grande do Sul, Brazil Psychology, Utrecht University, Nick Chater, Behavioural Science The Netherlands Taciano L. Milfont, School of Psychology Group, Warwick Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Jeanne L. Tsai, Department of United Kingdom Cognitive Evolution: How Infants Break Genetic and Brain Psychology, Stanford University, USA Frosso Motti-Stefanidi, Department Shaun Gallagher, Department of People Are Animals Too Into Language Diversity in AutismS of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian Frank H. Wilhelm, Department of Philosophy, University of Memphis, USA Linda B. Smith Thomas Bourgeron University of Athens, Greece Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, W. Tecumseh Fitch Marco Iacoboni, Department of University of Salzburg, Austria Department of Cognitive Biology Department of Department of Human Genetics Stacey Sinclair, Department of Psychology, Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria Psychological and Brain Sciences and Cognitive Functions Princeton University, USA Klaus R. Scherer, Department of University of California, Los Angeles, USA Indiana University Bloomington, USA Pasteur Institute, France Psychology, University of Geneva, Alan Teo, Department of Psychiatry and Andrzej Nowak, Department of School of Public Health, Oregon Health Switzerland (Discussant) Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland & Science University, USA and Florida Atlantic University, USA Bridging the Lab and the Real World Natalie Sebanz, Department of Better Minds: Understanding Cognitive Science, Central European Cognitive Enhancement Chair: Gabriella Vigliocco, College University, Hungary Chair: Lorenza S. Colzato, Department of London, United Kingdom Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Karen E. Adolph, Department of University, The Netherlands Psychology, New York University, USA Daphne Bavelier, Department of Emiliano Macaluso, Impact Team, Lyon Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland Neuroscience Research Center, France Arthur F. Kramer, Department of Susan Goldin-Meadow, Department www.icps2017.org Psychology, Northeastern University, USA of Comparative Human Development, E. Glenn Schellenberg, Department of The University of Chicago, USA ICPS
Recommended publications
  • Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/25303 SHARE Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019) DETAILS 256 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-48616-3 | DOI 10.17226/25303 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science; Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences; Committee on National Statistics; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Nuclear and Radiation Studies FIND RELATED TITLES Board; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics; Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics; Division on SUGGESTEDEngineering an CITATIONd Physical Sciences; Board on Research Data and Information; NCaotmiomnaittl eAec oand eSmciiesn coef ,S Ecniegninceeesr, inEgn,g Mineedeircininge,, aanndd MPeudbilcicin Peo 2li0c1y;9 P. Roleicpyr oadnudcibility aGnlodb Rael Aplfifcaairbsi;li tNy ainti oSncaiel Ancea.d Wemaisehsi nogf tSonc,ie DnCce: sT,h Een Ngianteioenrainl gA, caandde Mmeiedsi cPinress. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this
    [Show full text]
  • The R and Omegahat Projects in Statistical Computing
    The R and Omegahat Projects in Statistical Computing Brian D. Ripley [email protected] http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/∼ripley Outline • Statistical Computing – History – S – R • Application and Comparisons – Web servers – Embedding — Medieval Chant – R vs S-PLUS • Omegahat and Component Systems – The Omegahat project – Components — GGobi – The future? Statistical Computing and S Scene-setting: Statistical Computing 1980 Mainly Fortran programming, or PL/I (SAS). Batch computing (SAS, BMDP, SPSS, Genstat) with restricted range of platforms. Some small interactive systems (GLIM 3.77, Minitab). Very poor interactive graphics (2400 baud to a Tektronix storage tube if you were lucky). Flatbed and drum plotters, microfilm for publication-quality output off-line. Mainly home-brew solutions in research. (GLIM macros?) 1990 PCs become widespread, but FPUs still uncommon. Sun etc workstations available for researchers, and for teaching in a few places. Graphics could be pretty good (postscript printers, ca 1000 × 1000 pixel screens), but often was not, and mono text terminals were still widespread. C was beginning to be used, as more portable than Fortran. (Few PC Fortran compilers then and now.) Still SAS, SPSS etc as batch programs. S beginning to be make an impact on research and teaching. 2001 Little spread in machine speed (min 500MHz, max 1.5GHz), fast FPUs are universal. Colour everywhere, usually 24-bit colour. The video-games generation is now at university. Few people would dream of writing a complete program for a research idea: prototype and distribute in a higher-level language such as S or Matlab or Gauss or Ox or ...
    [Show full text]
  • Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R · 51,321 Views · More Stats
    12/15/2017 Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R · 51,321 views · More stats Share https://priceonomics.com/hadley-wickham-the-man-who-revolutionized-r/ 1/10 12/15/2017 Hadley Wickham, the Man Who Revolutionized R “Fundamentally learning about the world through data is really, really cool.” ~ Hadley Wickham, prolific R developer *** If you don’t spend much of your time coding in the open-source statistical programming language R, his name is likely not familiar to you -- but the statistician Hadley Wickham is, in his own words, “nerd famous.” The kind of famous where people at statistics conferences line up for selfies, ask him for autographs, and are generally in awe of him. “It’s utterly utterly bizarre,” he admits. “To be famous for writing R programs? It’s just crazy.” Wickham earned his renown as the preeminent developer of packages for R, a programming language developed for data analysis. Packages are programming tools that simplify the code necessary to complete common tasks such as aggregating and plotting data. He has helped millions of people become more efficient at their jobs -- something for which they are often grateful, and sometimes rapturous. The packages he has developed are used by tech behemoths like Google, Facebook and Twitter, journalism heavyweights like the New York Times and FiveThirtyEight, and government agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Truly, he is a giant among data nerds. *** Born in Hamilton, New Zealand, statistics is the Wickham family business: His father, Brian Wickham, did his PhD in the statistics heavy discipline of Animal Breeding at Cornell University and his sister has a PhD in Statistics from UC Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of False Positives and False Negatives in the STATCHECK 1 Algorithm: Reply to Nuijten Et Al
    Cite as: Schmidt, T. (2017). Sources of false positives and false negatives in the STATCHECK 1 algorithm: Reply to Nuijten et al. (2016). arXiv:1610.01010v8 [q-bio.NC] Sources of false positives and false negatives in the STATCHECK algorithm: Reply to Nuijten et al. (2016) arXiv:1610.01010v8 [q-bio.NC] Thomas Schmidt University of Kaiserslautern, Germany Experimental Psychology Unit www.sowi.uni-kl.de/psychologie [email protected] Abstract STATCHECK is an R algorithm designed to scan papers automatically for inconsistencies between test statistics and their associated p values (Nuijten et al., 2016). The goal of this comment is to point out an important and well-documented flaw in this busily applied algorithm: It cannot handle corrected p values. As a result, statistical tests applying appropriate corrections to the p value (e.g., for multiple tests, post-hoc tests, violations of assumptions, etc.) are likely to be flagged as reporting inconsistent statistics, whereas papers omitting necessary corrections are certified as correct. The STATCHECK algorithm is thus valid for only a subset of scientific papers, and conclusions about the quality or integrity of statistical reports should never be based solely on this program. STATCHECK is an R algorithm designed to scan papers automatically for inconsistencies between test statistics and their reported p values (Nuijten, Hartgerink, van Assen, Epskamp, and Wicherts, 2016). The algorithm is currently part of these authors’ project to automatically scan thousands of scientific psychology papers and post the results on a website when the program detects some discrepancy, essentially flagging papers for reporting inconsistent test statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • R Generation [1] 25
    IN DETAIL > y <- 25 > y R generation [1] 25 14 SIGNIFICANCE August 2018 The story of a statistical programming they shared an interest in what Ihaka calls “playing academic fun language that became a subcultural and games” with statistical computing languages. phenomenon. By Nick Thieme Each had questions about programming languages they wanted to answer. In particular, both Ihaka and Gentleman shared a common knowledge of the language called eyond the age of 5, very few people would profess “Scheme”, and both found the language useful in a variety to have a favourite letter. But if you have ever been of ways. Scheme, however, was unwieldy to type and lacked to a statistics or data science conference, you may desired functionality. Again, convenience brought good have seen more than a few grown adults wearing fortune. Each was familiar with another language, called “S”, Bbadges or stickers with the phrase “I love R!”. and S provided the kind of syntax they wanted. With no blend To these proud badge-wearers, R is much more than the of the two languages commercially available, Gentleman eighteenth letter of the modern English alphabet. The R suggested building something themselves. they love is a programming language that provides a robust Around that time, the University of Auckland needed environment for tabulating, analysing and visualising data, one a programming language to use in its undergraduate statistics powered by a community of millions of users collaborating courses as the school’s current tool had reached the end of its in ways large and small to make statistical computing more useful life.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics with Free and Open-Source Software
    Free and Open-Source Software • the four essential freedoms according to the FSF: • to run the program as you wish, for any purpose • to study how the program works, and change it so it does Statistics with Free and your computing as you wish Open-Source Software • to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor • to distribute copies of your modified versions to others • access to the source code is a precondition for this Wolfgang Viechtbauer • think of ‘free’ as in ‘free speech’, not as in ‘free beer’ Maastricht University http://www.wvbauer.com • maybe the better term is: ‘libre’ 1 2 General Purpose Statistical Software Popularity of Statistical Software • proprietary (the big ones): SPSS, SAS/JMP, • difficult to define/measure (job ads, articles, Stata, Statistica, Minitab, MATLAB, Excel, … books, blogs/posts, surveys, forum activity, …) • FOSS (a selection): R, Python (NumPy/SciPy, • maybe the most comprehensive comparison: statsmodels, pandas, …), PSPP, SOFA, Octave, http://r4stats.com/articles/popularity/ LibreOffice Calc, Julia, … • for programming languages in general: TIOBE Index, PYPL, GitHut, Language Popularity Index, RedMonk Rankings, IEEE Spectrum, … • note that users of certain software may be are heavily biased in their opinion 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 What is R? History of S and R • R is a system for data manipulation, statistical • … it began May 5, 1976 at: and numerical analysis, and graphical display • simply put: a statistical programming language • freely available under the GNU General Public License (GPL) → open-source
    [Show full text]
  • A History of R (In 15 Minutes… and Mostly in Pictures)
    A history of R (in 15 minutes… and mostly in pictures) JULY 23, 2020 Andrew Zief!ler Lunch & Learn Department of Educational Psychology RMCC University of Minnesota LATIS Who am I and Some Caveats Andy Zie!ler • I teach statistics courses in the Department of Educational Psychology • I have been using R since 2005, when I couldn’t put Me (on the EPSY faculty board) SAS on my computer (it didn’t run natively on a Me Mac), and even if I could have gotten it to run, I (everywhere else) couldn’t afford it. Some caveats • Although I was alive during much of the era I will be talking about, I was not working as a statistician at that time (not even as an elementary student for some of it). • My knowledge is second-hand, from other people and sources. Statistical Computing in the 1970s Bell Labs In 1976, scientists from the Statistics Research Group were actively discussing how to design a language for statistical computing that allowed interactive access to routines in their FORTRAN library. John Chambers John Tukey Home to Statistics Research Group Rick Becker Jean Mc Rae Judy Schilling Doug Dunn Introducing…`S` An Interactive Language for Data Analysis and Graphics Chambers sketch of the interface made on May 5, 1976. The GE-635, a 36-bit system that ran at a 0.5MIPS, starting at $2M in 1964 dollars or leasing at $45K/month. ’S’ was introduced to Bell Labs in November, but at the time it did not actually have a name. The Impact of UNIX on ’S' Tom London Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie, creators of John Reiser the UNIX operating system at a PDP-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes on CRAN 2014-07-01 to 2014-12-31
    NEWS AND NOTES 192 Changes on CRAN 2014-07-01 to 2014-12-31 by Kurt Hornik and Achim Zeileis New packages in CRAN task views Bayesian BayesTree. Cluster fclust, funFEM, funHDDC, pgmm, tclust. Distributions FatTailsR, RTDE, STAR, predfinitepop, statmod. Econometrics LinRegInteractive, MSBVAR, nonnest2, phtt. Environmetrics siplab. Finance GCPM, MSBVAR, OptionPricing, financial, fractal, riskSimul. HighPerformanceComputing GUIProfiler, PGICA, aprof. MachineLearning BayesTree, LogicForest, hdi, mlr, randomForestSRC, stabs, vcrpart. MetaAnalysis MAVIS, ecoreg, ipdmeta, metaplus. NumericalMathematics RootsExtremaInflections, Rserve, SimplicialCubature, fastGHQuad, optR. OfficialStatistics CoImp, RecordLinkage, rworldmap, tmap, vardpoor. Optimization RCEIM, blowtorch, globalOptTests, irace, isotone, lbfgs. Phylogenetics BAMMtools, BoSSA, DiscML, HyPhy, MPSEM, OutbreakTools, PBD, PCPS, PHYLOGR, RADami, RNeXML, Reol, Rphylip, adhoc, betapart, dendextend, ex- pands, expoTree, jaatha, kdetrees, mvMORPH, outbreaker, pastis, pegas, phyloTop, phyloland, rdryad, rphast, strap, surface, taxize. Psychometrics IRTShiny, PP, WrightMap, mirtCAT, pairwise. ReproducibleResearch NMOF. Robust TEEReg, WRS2, robeth, robustDA, robustgam, robustloggamma, robustreg, ror, rorutadis. Spatial PReMiuM. SpatioTemporal BayesianAnimalTracker, TrackReconstruction, fishmove, mkde, wildlifeDI. Survival DStree, ICsurv, IDPSurvival, MIICD, MST, MicSim, PHeval, PReMiuM, aft- gee, bshazard, bujar, coxinterval, gamboostMSM, imputeYn, invGauss, lsmeans, multipleNCC, paf, penMSM, spBayesSurv,
    [Show full text]
  • The Grammar of Graphics: an Introduction to Ggplot2
    The Grammar of Graphics: An Introduction to ggplot2 Jefferson Davis Research Analytics Historical background • In 1970s John Chambers, Rick Becker, and Allan Wilks develop S and S+ at Bell Labs • Bell System monopoly was broken up in 1982 • Late 80s some attempt to commercialize S/S+ but already too many non-commercial implementations • Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman produce R in early 1990s • Main developement now by Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) R: some useful tidbits • Use left arrow for variable assignment x <- 5 • Can concatenate with c() c(4,5) [1] 4 5 c("baby","elephant”) [1] "baby" "elephant" • Download packages with the install() command install.packages("ggplot2") install.packages("ggthemes") • Make packages available with library() library(ggplot2) library(ggthemes) • Get help with ? ? ggplot Statistical Graphics x y=x2 0.0 0.00 0.1 0.01 0.2 0.04 0.3 0.09 0.4 0.16 0.5 0.25 0.6 0.36 0.7 0.49 0.8 0.64 0.9 0.81 1.0 1.00 1.1 1.21 1.2 1.44 1.3 1.69 Statistical Graphics Graphics can convey meaning without displaying any particular quantatative data. Statistical Graphics Statistical Graphics The dataset The diamond dataset carat cut color clarity depth table price x y z 0.23 Ideal E SI2 61.5 55 326 3.95 3.98 2.43 0.21 Premium E SI1 59.8 61 326 3.89 3.84 2.31 0.23 Good E VS1 56.9 65 327 4.05 4.07 2.31 0.29 Premium I VS2 62.4 58 334 4.2 4.23 2.63 0.31 Good J SI2 63.3 58 335 4.34 4.35 2.75 Very 0.24 Good J VVS2 62.8 57 336 3.94 3.96 2.48 The dataset The dataset library(ggplot2) head(diamonds)[,1:4] # A tibble: 6 × 4 carat cut
    [Show full text]
  • Data Analysis in R
    Data analysis in R IML Machine Learning Workshop, CERN Andrew John Lowe Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Downloading and installing R You can follow this tutorial while I talk 1. Download R for Linux, Mac or Windows from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN): https://cran.r-project.org/ I Latest release version 3.3.3 (2017-03-06, “Another Canoe”) RStudio is a free and open-source integrated development environment (IDE) for R 2. Download RStudio from https://www.rstudio.com/ I Make sure you have installed R first! I Get RStudio Desktop (free) I Latest release version 1.0.136 Rstudio RStudio looks something like this. RStudio RStudio with source editor, console, environment and plot pane. What is R? I An open source programming language for statistical computing I R is a dialect of the S language I S is a language that was developed by John Chambers and others at Bell Labs I S was initiated in 1976 as an internal statistical analysis environment — originally implemented as FORTRAN libraries I Rewritten in C in 1988 I S continues to this day as part of the GNU free software project I R created by Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman in 1991 I First announcement of R to the public in 1993 I GNU General Public License makes R free software in 1995 I Version 1.0.0 release in 2000 Why use R? I Free I Runs on almost any standard computing platform/OS I Frequent releases; active development I Very active and vibrant user community I Estimated ~2 million users worldwide I R-help and R-devel mailing lists, Stack Overflow I Frequent conferences; useR!, EARL, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reproducibility of Statistical Results in Psychological Research: an Investigation Using Unpublished Raw Data
    Psychological Methods © 2020 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 2, No. 999, 000 ISSN: 1082-989X https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000365 The Reproducibility of Statistical Results in Psychological Research: An Investigation Using Unpublished Raw Data Richard Artner, Thomas Verliefde, Sara Steegen, Sara Gomes, Frits Traets, Francis Tuerlinckx, and Wolf Vanpaemel Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven Abstract We investigated the reproducibility of the major statistical conclusions drawn in 46 articles published in 2012 in three APA journals. After having identified 232 key statistical claims, we tried to reproduce, for each claim, the test statistic, its degrees of freedom, and the corresponding p value, starting from the raw data that were provided by the authors and closely following the Method section in the article. Out of the 232 claims, we were able to successfully reproduce 163 (70%), 18 of which only by deviating from the article’s analytical description. Thirteen (7%) of the 185 claims deemed significant by the authors are no longer so. The reproduction successes were often the result of cumbersome and time-consuming trial-and-error work, suggesting that APA style reporting in conjunction with raw data makes numerical verification at least hard, if not impossible. This article discusses the types of mistakes we could identify and the tediousness of our reproduction efforts in the light of a newly developed taxonomy for reproducibility. We then link our findings with other findings of empirical research on this topic, give practical recommendations on how to achieve reproducibility, and discuss the challenges of large-scale reproducibility checks as well as promising ideas that could considerably increase the reproducibility of psychological research.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman Year
    MULTI-FILES LOADER file_01.csv GGPLOT2 data(aes) + geom + labels R (Statistical computing) files <- list.files(pattern = “file_.*csv”) %>% ggplot(data = df, aes(x_col, y_col)) + geom() CHEET SHEET BY @CHARLSTOWN lapply(files, read_csv) %>% canvas + layer +...+ labs > general structure CREATOR: ROSS IHAKA AND ROBERT GENTLEMAN bind_rows() YEAR: 1995 ggplot(data = df) > canvas level STEABLE RELEASE (2020): 3.6.2 DATA FRAMES ACTIONS dplyr & tidyr aes(x_col, y_col) > aesthetics TOP FROM R: DPLYR, GGPLOT2, ESQUISSE, BIO DPLYR FUNCTIONS df %>% function geom_point() > geometry level CONDUCTOR, SHINY, LUBRIDATE, KNITR, TIDYR. rename(c_new = c1) > rename columns AESTHETICS aes(*) select(col) > select column ELEMENTAL LIBRARIES library( * ) select(-col) > drop column x_col, y_col > sets x,y elements library(dplyr) > Easy commands filter(c == “value”) > select rows label=labels > set ticks labels library(ggplot2) > Generate plots mutate(col = (c1+2)) > column mutations color > sets color values library(tidyverse) > Tidy data transmute(c1=c, c2=c/2) > drop & built cols alpha > sets the opacity library(kableExtra) > Table visualization arrange(des(c1)) > order by column fill = ‘color’ > sets the filled color library(knitr) > Regular exprs. join(df2) > join 2 data frames shape = class > set groups by class library(readr) > Files Reader group_by(col) > silent grooping group = class > sets plot by class library(stringr) > Strings treatment summarise(c* = max(c)) > after grooping shape > geometry shape size = 4 > sets the size TIDYR FUNCTIONS df %>% function
    [Show full text]