The Journal Ol the Department Ot Agriculture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Opf)P Jsotanp
STUDIES ON FOLIICOLOUS FUNGI ASSOCIATED WITH SOME PLANTS DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF e iHasfter of $I|iIos;opf)p JSotanp (PLANT PATHOLOGY) BY J4thar J^ll ganU DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIQARH (INDIA) 2010 s*\ %^ (^/jyr, .ii -^^fffti UnWei* 2 6 OCT k^^ ^ Dedictded To Prof. Mohd, Farooq Azam 91-0571-2700920 Extn-3303 M.Sc, Ph.D. (AUg.), FNSI Ph: 91-0571-2702016(0) 91-0571-2403503 (R) Professor of Botany 09358256574(M) (Plant Nematology) E-mail: [email protected](aHahoo.coin [email protected] Ex-Vice-President, Nematological Society of India. Department of Botany Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh-202002 (U.P.) India Date: z;. t> 2.AI0 Certificate This is to certify that the dissertation entitled """^Studies onfoUicolous fungi associated with some plants** submitted to the Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy (Plant pathology), is a bonafide work carried out by Mr. Athar Ali Ganie under my supervision. (Prof. Mohd Farooq Azam) Residence: 4/35, "AL-FAROOQ", Bargad House Connpound, Dodhpur, Civil Lines, Aligarh-202002 (U.P.) INDIA. ACKNOWLEDQEMEKT 'First I Sow in reverence to Jifmigfity JlLL.^Jf tfie omnipresent, whose Blessings provided me a [ot of energy and encouragement in accomplishing the tas^ Wo 600^ is ever written in soCitude and no research endeavour is carried out in solitude, I ma^ use of this precious opportunity to express my heartfelt gratitude andsincerest than^ to my learned teacher and supervisor ^rof. -
Four Master Teachers Who Fostered American Turn-Of-The-(20<Sup>TH
MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 Mycotaxon, Ltd. ©2021 January–March 2021—Volume 136, pp. 1–58 https://doi.org/10.5248/136.1 Four master teachers who fostered American turn-of-the-(20TH)-century mycology and plant pathology Ronald H. Petersen Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37919-1100 Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—The Morrill Act of 1862 afforded the US states the opportunity to found state colleges with agriculture as part of their mission—the so-called “land-grant colleges.” The Hatch Act of 1887 gave the same opportunity for agricultural experiment stations as functions of the land-grant colleges, and the “third Morrill Act” (the Smith-Lever Act) of 1914 added an extension dimension to the experiment stations. Overall, the end of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th was a time for growing appreciation for, and growth of institutional education in the natural sciences, especially botany and its specialties, mycology, and phytopathology. This paper outlines a particular genealogy of mycologists and plant pathologists representative of this era. Professor Albert Nelson Prentiss, first of Michigan State then of Cornell, Professor William Russel Dudley of Cornell and Stanford, Professor Mason Blanchard Thomas of Wabash College, and Professor Herbert Hice Whetzel of Cornell Plant Pathology were major players in the scenario. The supporting cast, the students selected, trained, and guided by these men, was legion, a few of whom are briefly traced here. Key words—“New Botany,” European influence, agrarian roots Chapter 1. Introduction When Dr. Lexemual R. -
Corn Smuts, RPD No
report on RPD No. 203 PLANT February 1990 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN CORN SMUTS Corn smuts occur throughout the world. Common corn smut, caused by the fungus Ustilago zeae (synonym U. maydis), and head smut, caused by the fungus Sporisorium holci-sorghi (synonyms Sphacelotheca reiliana, Sorosporium reilianum and Sporisorium reilianum), are spectacular in appearance and easily distinguished. Common smut occurs worldwide wherever corn (maize) is grown, by presence of large conspicuous galls or replacement of grain kernels with smut sori. The quality of the remaining yield is often reduced by the presence of black smut spores on the surface of healthy kernels. COMMON SMUT Common smut is well known to all Illinois growers. The fungus attacks only corn–field corn (dent and flint), Indian or ornamental corn, popcorn, and sweet corn–and the closely related teosinte (Zea mays subsp. mexicana) but is most destructive to sweet corn. The smut is most prevalent on young, actively growing plants that have Figure 1. Infection of common corn smut been injured by detasseling in seed fields, hail, blowing soil or and on the ear. Smut galls are covered by the particles, insects, “buggy-whipping”, and by cultivation or spraying silvery white membrane. equipment. Corn smut differs from other cereal smuts in that any part of the plant above ground may be attacked, from the seedling stage to maturity. Losses from common smut are highly variable and rather difficult to measure, ranging from a trace up to 10 percent or more in localized areas. In rare cases, the loss in a particular field of sweet corn may approach 100 percent. -
Mycosphere Notes 225–274: Types and Other Specimens of Some Genera of Ascomycota
Mycosphere 9(4): 647–754 (2018) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/3 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Mycosphere Notes 225–274: types and other specimens of some genera of Ascomycota Doilom M1,2,3, Hyde KD2,3,6, Phookamsak R1,2,3, Dai DQ4,, Tang LZ4,14, Hongsanan S5, Chomnunti P6, Boonmee S6, Dayarathne MC6, Li WJ6, Thambugala KM6, Perera RH 6, Daranagama DA6,13, Norphanphoun C6, Konta S6, Dong W6,7, Ertz D8,9, Phillips AJL10, McKenzie EHC11, Vinit K6,7, Ariyawansa HA12, Jones EBG7, Mortimer PE2, Xu JC2,3, Promputtha I1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China 3 World Agro Forestry Centre, East and Central Asia, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China 4 Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China 5 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China 6 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 7 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 8 Department Research (BT), Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, BE-1860 Meise, Belgium 9 Direction Générale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Rue A. -
CONTROL of SMUT in WHEAT and OTHER SMALL GRAINS by H
Bulletin No. 116 June, 1931 Montana State College, Extension Service, J. C. Taylor, Director, Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics. Montana State College and Uni~ed States Department of Agriculture, co-operating. Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress ~ay 8 and June 30, 1.914. ~ CONTROL OF SMUT IN WHEAT AND OTHER SMALL GRAINS By H. E. Morris, Extension Plant Pathologist Waldo Kidder, Extension Agronomist Smuts cost the farmers of Montana many thousands of dollars each year. In 1930, stinking smut of wheat alone caused a loss of approximately $750;000, due to decreased yields and to a lower price per bushel. This loss and also that due to the smuts {..:Fig. 1. Smutted and normal heads of wheat. The head at the left ,is a typi:cal head affected with covered or stinking smut, The next, head IS a he'althy head. The two heads on the right show two stages of the loose smut in wheat. (-Courtesy,D. S. Dept. of Agr.) . ,( 2 MONTANA EXTENSION SERVICE of oats, barley and rye may be largely prevented by adopting the methods of seed treatment described in this bulletin. What Is Smut Smut is produced by a small parasitic plant, mould-like in appearance, belonging to a group called fungi (Fig. 2). Smut lives most of its life within and at the expense of the wheat plant. The smut powder, so familiar to all, is composed of myriads of spores which correspond to seeds in the higher plants. In the process of harvesting and threshing, these spores are dis· I Fig'. -
Corn Smuts S
A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication Oregon State University • University of Idaho • Washington State University PNW 647 • July 2013 Corn Smuts S. K. Mohan, P. B. Hamm, G. H. Clough, and L. J. du Toit orn smuts are widely distributed throughout the world. The incidence of corn smuts in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) varies Cby location and is usually low. Nonetheless, these diseases occasionally cause significant economic losses when susceptible cultivars are grown under conditions favorable for disease development. Smut diseases of corn are, in general, more destructive to sweet corn than to field corn. The term smut is derived from the powdery, dark brown to black, soot-like mass of spores produced in galls. These galls can form on various plant parts. Three types of smut infect corn—common smut, caused by Ustilago maydis (= Ustilago zeae); head smut, caused by Sphacelotheca reiliana; and false smut, caused by Ustilaginoidea virens. False smut is not a concern in the PNW, so this publication deals University S. Krishna by State Mohan,Photo © Oregon only with common and head smuts. Figure 1. Common smut galls on an ear of sweet corn. Each gall represents a single kernel infected by the common Common smut smut fungus. Common smut is caused by the fungal pathogen U. maydis and is also known as boil smut or blister smut (Figure 1). Common smut occurs throughout PNW corn production areas, although it is less common in western Oregon and western Washington than east of the Cascade Mountains. Infection in commercial plantings may result in considerable damage and yield loss in some older sweet corn cultivars, but yield loss in some of the newer, less susceptible cultivars is rarely significant. -
Control of Loose Smut of Barley Richard Mullington Lewis Iowa State University
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1962 Control of loose smut of barley Richard Mullington Lewis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Lewis, Richard Mullington, "Control of loose smut of barley " (1962). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2102. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2102 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 63-1587 microfilmed exactly as received LEWIS, Richard Mullington, 1920- CONTROL OF LOOSE SMUT OF BARLEY. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1962 Agriculture, plant pathology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CONTROL OF LOOSE SMUT OF BARLEY by Richard Mullington Lewis A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Plant Pathology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major D rtment Signature was redacted for privacy. D^ân of Grad lollege Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1962 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 PERTINENT LITERATURE 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 Materials 6 Methods of Application 7 Seed Treatment Evaluations 12 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 15 1952 Results 15 1953 Results 18 195m- Results 24 1955 Results 39 DISCUSSION 41 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 48 LITERATURE CITED 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 APPENDIX 54 iii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. -
View of Bitunicate Ascomycetes, and Transferred Helochora to Mesnieraceae
Fungal Diversity Two new genera in the Phyllachoraceae: Sphaerodothella to accommodate Sphaerodothis danthoniae, and Parberya gen. novo Ceridwen A. Pearce1 and Kevin D. Hyde2 IAustralian Tropical Mycology Research Centre, PO Box 312, Kuranda, 4872, Queensland, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] 2Centre for Research in Fungal Diversity, Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Pearce, CA. and Hyde, K.D. (200 I). Two new genera in the Phyllachoraceae: Sphaerodothella to accommodate Sphaerodothis danthoniae, and Parberya gen. novoFungal Diversity 6: 83-97. Sphaerodothis danthoniae produces black tar spots on leaves and culms of Danthonia spp. It is redescribed and illustrated in a new genus Sphaerodothella. Sphaerodothella danthoniae differs from Sphaerodothis in having a peridium composed of hyaline to brown, thin-walled, flattened fungal cells which merge with host cells, rather than a distinct stroma of melanised textura globosa, and pale brown ascospores which have a distinctive dark brown mucilaginous perisporium. Parberya is described for a new species of tar spot fungi, P. kosciuskoa, found on Danthonia pallid a from Mt. Kosciusko, Australia, and to accommodate Sphaerodothis arxii P.F. Cannon on Pentameris sp. Parberya are typical phyllachoraceous tar spot fungi on grasses, which have distinctive golden-brown ascospores omamented with short, blunt spines. The previously undescribed andromorph of Parberya arxii is also described. Keywords: Anthostomella danthoniae, Danthonia, foliicolous fungi, Poaceae, Sphaerodothis arxii, tar spots, taxonomy. Introduction The Phyllachoraceae are generally plant parasites, characterised by ascohymenial development with paraphyses, thin-walled asci, which may have an apical apparatus that does not stain blue in iodine, and ascospores which are often hyaline and one-celled (Cannon, 1991). -
Toxic Plants Affecting Both Large and Small Animals Are a Major Concern
Toxic Plants of Veterinary and Agricultural Interest in Colombia Gonzalo J. Diaz Toxicology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, National University of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia Corresponding author: Gonzalo Diaz, [email protected] Abstract Colombia has the second largest plant biodiversity of any country in the world, with about 25,000 species of vascular plants. This is due in part to its equatorial location, and large variation in elevation and associated gradients in temperatures and rainfall. Livestock in Colombia graze vast tracts of land with a wide variety of herbaceous and woody plants. Although the annual cattle mortality from plant poisoning in Colombia is estimated at 130,000, the economic impact on the entire livestock industry has not been fully evaluated. Information on toxic plants is scarce in Colombia, and livestock poisoning by plants is seldom documented. This review presents the current knowledge on the identity of plants known to have poisoned livestock in Colombia and on research conducted into these toxic plants. To the extent known, the toxic component(s), major clinical signs and circumstances of poisoning, location, and environmental factors are discussed. Many of the plants identified in Colombia are considered toxic on the basis of world literature, but toxicosis in Colombia has not always been documented. The information on toxic plant chemistry in Colombia is mostly limited to the plant’s nitrate or cyanide content. Research is needed to determine not only which plants represent a potential risk for animal health and production but also their phytochemistry and toxicology. It is strongly recommended that veterinarians document plant poisoning cases through government reporting services and that university and government veterinarians, scientists, and extension agents investigate episodes of plant toxicosis and publish their findings. -
Contribution to the Phylogeny and a New Species of Coccodiella (Phyllachorales)
Mycol Progress https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1353-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Contribution to the phylogeny and a new species of Coccodiella (Phyllachorales) M. Mardones1,2 & T. Trampe-Jaschik 1 & T. A. Hofmann3 & M. Piepenbring1 Received: 14 July 2017 /Revised: 17 October 2017 /Accepted: 23 October 2017 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Coccodiella is a genus of plant-parasitic species in spot fungi with superficial or erumpent perithecia seem to be the family Phyllachoraceae (Phyllachorales, Ascomycota), restricted to the family Phyllachoraceae, independently of the i.e., tropical tar spot fungi. Members of the genus Coccodiella host plant. We also discuss the biodiversity and host-plant pat- are tropical in distribution and are host-specific, growing on terns of species of Coccodiella worldwide. plant species belonging to nine host plant families. Most of the known species occur on various genera and species of the Keywords Coccodiella calatheae . Phyllachoraceae . Plant Melastomataceae in tropical America. In this study, we describe parasites . Tar spot fungi . Phyllachora . Marantaceae . the new species C. calatheae from Panama, growing on Zingiberales Calathea crotalifera (Marantaceae). We obtained ITS, nrLSU, and nrSSU sequence data from this new species and from other freshly collected specimens of five species of Coccodiella on Introduction members of Melastomataceae from Ecuador and Panama. Phylogenetic analyses allowed us to confirm the placement of Hara (1911) introduced the genus Coccodiella for a plant- Coccodiella within Phyllachoraceae, as well as the monophyly parasitic species characterized by a stroma originating in the of the genus. The phylogeny of representative species within mesophyll, which then proliferates through the lower epider- the family Phyllachoraceae, including Coccodiella spp., mis, forming a sessile hypostroma attached to the host tissue. -
Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two
(topsheet) Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113. Fieldiana, Botany H. Thorsten Lumbsch Dept. of Botany Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr. Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 665-7881 fax: 312-665-7158 e-mail: [email protected] Sabine M. Huhndorf Dept. of Botany Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr. Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 665-7855 fax: 312-665-7158 e-mail: [email protected] 1 (cover page) FIELDIANA Botany NEW SERIES NO 00 Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113 H. Thorsten Lumbsch Sabine M. Huhndorf [Date] Publication 0000 PUBLISHED BY THE FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 2 Table of Contents Abstract Part One. Outline of Ascomycota - 2009 Introduction Literature Cited Index to Ascomycota Subphylum Taphrinomycotina Class Neolectomycetes Class Pneumocystidomycetes Class Schizosaccharomycetes Class Taphrinomycetes Subphylum Saccharomycotina Class Saccharomycetes Subphylum Pezizomycotina Class Arthoniomycetes Class Dothideomycetes Subclass Dothideomycetidae Subclass Pleosporomycetidae Dothideomycetes incertae sedis: orders, families, genera Class Eurotiomycetes Subclass Chaetothyriomycetidae Subclass Eurotiomycetidae Subclass Mycocaliciomycetidae Class Geoglossomycetes Class Laboulbeniomycetes Class Lecanoromycetes Subclass Acarosporomycetidae Subclass Lecanoromycetidae Subclass Ostropomycetidae 3 Lecanoromycetes incertae sedis: orders, genera Class Leotiomycetes Leotiomycetes incertae sedis: families, genera Class Lichinomycetes Class Orbiliomycetes Class Pezizomycetes Class Sordariomycetes Subclass Hypocreomycetidae Subclass Sordariomycetidae Subclass Xylariomycetidae Sordariomycetes incertae sedis: orders, families, genera Pezizomycotina incertae sedis: orders, families Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113 Introduction Literature Cited 4 Abstract Part One presents the current classification that includes all accepted genera and higher taxa above the generic level in the phylum Ascomycota. -
The Smuts of Wheat, Oats, Barley
360 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE 1953 consist of chlor otic spots and streaks. The virus is transmitted by at least two species of leafhoppcrs, Nephoiettix apicalis (hipunctatus) var. cincticeps and Deltocephalus dor salis. Experiments with N. apicalis have shown that the virus The Smuts of passes through part of the eggs to the next generation, for as many as seven generations. Wheat, Oats, H. H. McKiNNEY holds degrees from Michigan State College and the University Barley of Wisconsin. In igig he joined the staff of the division of cereal crops and diseases of the Bureau of Plant Industry^ Soils, and C. S. Holton, V. F. Tapke Agricultural Engineering, where he has devoted most of his lim.e in research on Many millions of dollars' worth of viruses and virus diseases. grain are destroyed every year by the smuts of wheat, oats, and barley. For further reading: For purposes of study and control, //. H. McKinney: Evidence of Virus Muta- we can consider the smuts as being tion in the Common Mosaic of Tobcicco, seedling-infecting or floral-infecting. Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 5/, The seedling-infecting species come pages g^i-gSi, 1^33; Mosaic Diseases of Wheat and Related Cereals, U. S. D. A. Circular ^42, in contact with the host plants as ig37; Mosaic of Bromus inermis, Knih H. follows: The microscopic spores from Fellows and C. 0. Johnston, Phytopaihology, smutted plants are carried by wind, volume j2, page 331, ig42; Genera of the Plant rain, insects, and other agencies to Viruses, Journal oj the Washington Academy oj Sciences, volume 34, pages I3g-i54, 1944; De- the heads of healthy plants (as in scriptions and Revision of Several Species of loose smut of oats).