DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Invented the Internet? 1958-1961: Connect Computers?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who Invented the Internet? 1958-1961: Connect Computers? How did the Internet come to be? ❒ It started as a research project to experiment with connecting computers together with packet switched 2: Internet History networks. It was developed with funding and leadership of the Defense Last Modified: Department’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). 1/20/2003 12:46:58 PM -1 -2 Who invented the Internet? 1958-1961: Connect Computers? ❒ Al Gore? No ☺ ❒ 1958 – After USSR launches Sputnik, first artificial earth satellite, US forms the Advanced ❒ Leonard Kleinrock who did early work in Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the following packet switching? year, within the Department of Defense (DoD) to ❒ Vint Cerf and Robert Kahn who defined the establish US lead in science and technology "Internet Protocol" (IP) and participated in applicable to the military the development of TCP? ❒ 1961 – First published work on packet switching ❒ (“Information Flow in Large Communication Nets”, Tim Berners-Lee developed HTTP to Leonard Kleinrock, MIT graduate student) support a global hyper-text system he ❒ 1964 – other independent work in packet switching called the World Wide Web? (Internet vs at RAND Institute and National Physics the World Wide Web?) Laboratory in England -3 -4 1966 –1968: Connect 1969: First Connections Computers? Funded ❒ 1966 – Lawrence Roberts (colleague of ❒ 4/7/1969 – First RFC (“Host Software” by Kleinrock from MIT) publishes overall plan Steve Crocker) basis for the Network for an ARPAnet, a proposed packet switch Control Protocol(NCP) network ❒ 9/2/1969 – Leonard Kleinrock’s computer ❒ 1968 – ARPA awards contracts for four at UCLA becomes first node on the nodes in ARPANET to UCLA (Network Measurement), Stanford Research ARPANET Institute (Network Information Center), ❒ 10/29/1969 – First packets sent; Charlie UCSB (Interactive Mathematics) and U Kline attempts use of remote login from Utah (Graphics); BBN gets contract to UCLA to SRI; system crashes as “G” in build the IMP switches entered -5 -6 1 1967-1971: So what do we do 1971-1973 with it? Networks Growing ❒ 1967-1972 – Vint Cerf, graduate student in ❒ 1970 - First cross-country link installed by Kleinrock’s lab, works on application level AT&T between UCLA and BBN at 56kbps protocols for the ARPANET (file transfer ❒ Other networks: ALOHAnet (microwave and Telnet protocols) network in Hawaii), Telenet ❒ 1971 - Ray Tomlinson of BBN writes (commercial, BBN), Transpac (France) email application; derived from two ❒ 1973 – Ethernet was designed in 1973 existing: an intra-machine email by Bob Metcalfe at Xerox Palo Alto program (SENDMSG) and an Research Center (PARC) experimental file transfer program ❒ How do we connect these networks (CPYNET) together? -7 -8 1972-1974: Protocol 1974-1978: Development of Development TCP/IP ❒ 1972-1974 – Robert Kahn and Vint Cerf ❒ 1974 – First full draft of TCP produced develop protocols to connect networks ❒ November 1977 - First three-network without any knowledge of the topology TCP/IP based interconnection or specific characteristics of the demonstrated linking SATNET, PRNET and underlying nets ARPANET in a path leading from Menlo ❒ 1972 – Robert Kahn gives first public Park, CA to Univ. College London and back demonstration of ARPAnet (now 15 to USC/ISI (Marina del Ray, CA) nodes) at International Conference on ❒ 1978 – TCP split into TCP and IP Computer Communication -9 -10 1981 –1984: 1983-1986: Not Just a Base Protocols In Place Research Project Anymore ❒ 1981 – Term “Internet” coined to mean ❒ 1984 – Domain Name System collection of interconnected networks introduced; 1000+ hosts (200 hosts by ❒ end of 1970s; over 100000 by end of 1982 – ISO releases OSI seven layer 1980s) model; actual protocols die but model is ❒ 1986 – NSFNET created to provide influential access to 5 super computer centers ❒ 1/1/1983 – Original ARPANET NCP was including Theory Center at Cornell banned from the ARPANET and TCP/IP (NSFNET backbone speeds 56 Kbps) was required ❒ 1983 – ARPANET split into ARPANET ❒ 1984 – Cisco Systems founded and MILNET; MILNET to carry defense related traffic -11 -12 2 1990-1993: 1988-1989: Growing Pains? WWW Explosion ❒ 1988 - Nodes on Internet began to double ❒ 1990 – ARPANET ceases to exist every year ❒ 1990 – Tim Berners-Lee develops hypertext ❒ November 1988 – Internet worm affecting system with initial versions of HTML and HTTP about 10% of the 60000 computers on the and first GUI web browser called Internet (Robert Morris, Cornell) “WorldWideWeb” ❒ 1988 - Internet Assigned Numbers Authority ❒ 1993 – Mosaic, a GUI web browser, written by (IANA) established in December with Jon Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina at NCSA takes Postel as its Director. Postel was also the RFC world by storm (showed in-line images and Editor and US Domain registrar for many was easy to install); years ❒ WWW proliferates at a 341,634% annual growth rate of service traffic -13 -14 1990-1993: Ready for Public 1995: As we know it Consumption ❒ 1990 – First ISP world.std.com ❒ 1995- NSFNET reverts back to a research ❒ 1991 – NSFNET lifted restrictions on network. Main US backbone traffic now use of NSFNET for commercial purposes routed through commercial internet ❒ 1992 – Internet Society founded service providers ❒ 1993 – InterNIC created by NSF to ❒ 1995 – Sun launches Java provide Internet services; Private ❒ 1995 - Traditional online dial-up systems companies transition into roles (AT&T – directory and database services; (Compuserve, America Online, Prodigy) Network Solutions – registration begin to provide Internet access services; CERFnet – information ❒ 1995 - Registration of domain names no services) longer free -15 -16 How to make the Internet Internet Grows Exponentially better? ❒ ???????????????????????? -17 -18 3 Tim Berners-Lee: Making the Vint Cerf: Open Challenges Internet Better ❒ Vint Cerf: “My primary disappointment ❒ Tim Berners-Lee: “Nothing can be perfect, but the has been the slow pace of high speed Web could be a lot better. It would help is we had access for residential customers and the easy hypertext editors which let us make links demise of so many competitive local between documents with the mouse. It would help exchange carriers (CLECs) in the US. if everyone with Web access also had some space The second area of disappointment is they can write to -- and that is changing nowadays the slow uptake of version 6 of the as a lot of ISPs give web space to users. It would Internet protocol (IPv6). Perhaps the help if we had an easy way of controlling access to third area is the continuing difficulty files on the web so that we could safely use it for caused by viruses, worms and private, group, or family information without fear of the wrong people being able to access it.” distributed denial of service attacks.” -19 -20 Making the Internet Better ❒ How about you? -21 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARIN History and Services
    History and Services www.arin.net Table of Contents Part I: History..............................................................................................3 How did ARIN get started?..................................................................3 Where does ARIN fit in the “Big Picture”?.......................................4 Key Organizations - ICANN, the NRO, and PTI/IANA..................5 ARIN Community & Membership......................................................7 Stakeholders.............................................................................................7 ARIN the Organization..........................................................................8 ARIN Staff...................................................................................................8 ARIN Elections........................................................................................12 Part II: Services........................................................................................13 The Internet Numbering Landscape.............................................13 ARIN’S Strategic Plan..........................................................................16 Scope of ARIN Services – the things we do for you!................16 Get Involved...........................................................................................20 Acronym Quick Guide.........................................................................21 2 Part I: History How did ARIN get started? 1960s to 1980s: Internet Foundation The formation of
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Mobile Technology Into Museum Education: a Discussion of the State of the Art Mark P
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Theses Spring 5-2011 Integration of Mobile Technology into Museum Education: A Discussion of the State of the Art Mark P. Diemer Seton Hall University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Diemer, Mark P., "Integration of Mobile Technology into Museum Education: A Discussion of the State of the Art" (2011). Theses. 26. https://scholarship.shu.edu/theses/26 INTEGRATION OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY Il INTO MUSEUM EDUCATION: A DISCUSSION 1 OF THE STATE OF THE ART i 1 I by I Mark P. Diemer I A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of I Master of Arts in Museum Professions j I I Seton Hall University May 2011 I I ! 1 i I I I Copy © Mark P. Diemer, 2011. All Rights Reserved. I No part of this document may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the author. Copyrights to images are owned by other copyright holders and should not be reproduced under any circumstances. TIlls document as shown is not for publication and was produced in satisfaction of thesis I requirements. I I I I ,! } ! l I; Seton Hall University Abstract Integration of Mobile Technology into Museum Education: A Discussion of the State of the Art by Mark P. Diemer 'lnesi" Advisor: Dr. Petra Chu Museum Professions Program Approval: This thesis is an attempt to examine the current state of mobile technology use in museum education programs. Mobile technology is fast becoming the communications and learning medium of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Paths to Our Digital Future Table of Contents
    INTERNET SOCIETY GLOBAL INTERNET REPORT Paths to Our Digital Future Table of Contents Foreword by Kathy Brown, Executive summary Introduction President and CEO, 5–13 14–16 Internet Society 3–4 How we see the Internet Drivers of Change Drivers of Change 16–19 & Areas of Impact 24–61 21–23 Areas of Impact What if? Recommendations 62–84 85–103 104–110 Conclusion Methodology Acknowledgements 111–113 114–117 118–119 internetsociety.org 2 Foreword Foreword by Kathy Brown, President and CEO, Internet Society The Internet Society’s history is inseparably tied to The Internet Society’s fourth annual Global Internet the history of the Internet itself. We were founded Report — Paths to Our Digital Future — explores in 1992 by Internet pioneers Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf, this important question. This comprehensive report along with numerous other visionary individuals brings together insights from across our diverse and organisations. These early Internet luminaries global community to inspire all who engage with the believed that ‘a society would emerge from the Internet to think differently and to prepare for the idea that is the Internet’. And they were right. The opportunities and challenges on the horizon. Internet has come a long way since its inception, and is now part of our social fabric — essential to how No one knows exactly how the Internet will evolve, we connect, communicate, create and collaborate. but we do know it will require new thinking, new approaches and new tools for this rapidly changing 2017 marks a significant milestone for the Internet world around us. Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Triad Rackamp 350 & 600 DSP V2.0 Instructions for IP Setup
    Triad RackAmp 350 & 600 DSP v2.0 Instructions for IP Setup & Advanced Features This document describes IP (Internet Protocol) features unique to our RackAmp 350 & 600 DSP v2.0. Other connections, features and functions for these amps are very similar to our previous RackAmp 300/500/1000 DSP (v1.X). For more information see our RackAmp 350/600 DSP v2 Quick Start Guide and Triad SubAmp DSP v1.X Installer Setup Manual on the HOW TO or SUPPORT pages of our website http://www.triadspeakers.com/index.html . IP Features in RackAmp v2.0: IP for Setup – Use a computer or smart phone for remote setup when your subwoofer amps are located in different rooms than your subwoofers. IP for two Advanced Features 1. 6 Band Parametric EQ with 5 Hz resolution (-12dB to + 3dB; Q of .3 to 10). 2. Two Customizable Presets (default Volume & 1 band Parametric EQ). Note: IP allows Setup, Reset, or review by browser only; it is NOT for use with an external control system (Crestron, Control4, etc). IP Connections: • Via LAN: Connect RackAmp Ethernet Interface to a LAN with a standard Ethernet cable. If connecting to a wireless LAN, you can also use a Wi-Fi enabled smart phone, tablet, or laptop. The only issue when using a smart phone or tablet is that sliders do not work with the touch screen (the screen moves, not the slider). Instead, click on the number box above the slider and type the numbers in directly. • Direct to computer: Connect RackAmp’s Ethernet Interface direct to computer with an Ethernet crossover cable or a standard Ethernet cable with a crossover adaptor.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Reality Behind Etoy Vs Etoys Com Other Battles to Control Cyberspace By: Adam Wishart Regula Bochsler ISBN: 0066210763 See Detail of This Book on Amazon.Com
    Leaving Reality Behind etoy vs eToys com other battles to control cyberspace By: Adam Wishart Regula Bochsler ISBN: 0066210763 See detail of this book on Amazon.com Book served by AMAZON NOIR (www.amazon-noir.com) project by: PAOLO CIRIO paolocirio.net UBERMORGEN.COM ubermorgen.com ALESSANDRO LUDOVICO neural.it Page 1 discovering a new toy "The new artist protests, he no longer paints." -Dadaist artist Tristan Tzara, Zh, 1916 On the balmy evening of June 1, 1990, fleets of expensive cars pulled up outside the Zurich Opera House. Stepping out and passing through the pillared porticoes was a Who's Who of Swiss society-the head of state, national sports icons, former ministers and army generals-all of whom had come to celebrate the sixty-fifth birthday of Werner Spross, the owner of a huge horticultural business empire. As one of Zurich's wealthiest and best-connected men, it was perhaps fitting that 650 of his "close friends" had been invited to attend the event, a lavish banquet followed by a performance of Romeo and Juliet. Defiantly greeting the guests were 200 demonstrators standing in the square in front of the opera house. Mostly young, wearing scruffy clothes and sporting punky haircuts, they whistled and booed, angry that the opera house had been sold out, allowing itself for the first time to be taken over by a rich patron. They were also chanting slogans about the inequity of Swiss society and the wealth of Spross's guests. The glittering horde did its very best to ignore the disturbance. The protest had the added significance of being held on the tenth anniversary of the first spark of the city's most explosive youth revolt of recent years, The Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Internet
    The Open Internet What it is, and how to avoid mistaking it for something else. SEPTEMBER 2014 Introduction1 It is not by chance that we have enjoyed the extraordinary success of the Internet as a global engine of economic, political, cultural, and social progress. Fundamental principles embedded in the architecture of the Internet as a collaboration among designers, builders, providers, and users led directly to this success. Sustaining it will require a commitment by today’s policy makers to understand and respect those principles—not because they are honored by time or tradition, but because they confer tangible present and future benefits. The term "Open Internet" has been used so often and so freely that everyone knows what it means—or thinks they know what it means, and assumes that everyone else means the same thing when they use it. After all, the core enabling principle of the Internet as a system that includes users, applications, and infrastructure is openness, which infuses every aspect of the modern Internet—technical, economic, political, and social. But depending on the context in which it is used, the word open conveys different meanings, particularly when subtle (or not–so–subtle) variations are introduced by translation from one language to another; and because “openness” has become an important issue in many Internet political debates, defining what it means has become part of those debates. As is usually the case when people understand the terms and concepts of a debate differently, it will be difficult for us to resolve important issues of Internet policy until we reconcile our different understandings of open and openness in principle and in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Development Process Stockholm October 2010
    The Internet development Process Stockholm October 2010 Pål Spilling What I would talk about? • The main Norwegian contributions • Competitions between alternatives • Did Norway benefit from its participation? • Some observations and reflections • Conclusion A historical timeline 1981/82 TCP/IP accepted standard for US 1993 Web browser Mosaic Defence became available 1980 TCP/IP fully 2000 developed 1975 Start of the Internet Project; 1974 Preliminary specificaons of TCP 1977 First 3 – network Demonstration Mid 1973 ARPANET covers US, Hawaii, FFI Kjeller, and UCL London 1950 1955 ‐1960, End 1968 Ideas of resource Start of the ARPANET sharing networks project Norway and UK on ARPANET 1973 London o SATNET o Kjeller Norwegian Contributions • SATNET development – Simulations – Performance measurements • Internet performance measurements • Packet speech experiments over the Internet • Improved PRNET protocol architecture Competitions between alternatives • X.25 (ITU) • ISO standards (committee work) • DECNET (proprietary) • IBM (proprietary) • TCP/IP demonstrated its usefullness i 1977 accepted as a standard for US defence Norwegian benefits • Enabled me to create a small Norwegian internet • Got access to UNIX, with TCP/IP and user services integrated • Gave research scientists early exposure to internet and its services • Early curriculum in computer communications; Oslo University Observations and reflections • Norwegian Arpanet Committee; dissolved itself due to lack of interest • IP address space too small for todays use • TCP split in
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of the Internet
    Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] Preliminary version, July 6, 2001 Abstract The Internet is the main cause of the recent explosion of activity in optical fiber telecommunica- tions. The high growth rates observed on the Internet, and the popular perception that growth rates were even higher, led to an upsurge in research, development, and investment in telecommunications. The telecom crash of 2000 occurred when investors realized that transmission capacity in place and under construction greatly exceeded actual traffic demand. This chapter discusses the growth of the Internet and compares it with that of other communication services. Internet traffic is growing, approximately doubling each year. There are reasonable arguments that it will continue to grow at this rate for the rest of this decade. If this happens, then in a few years, we may have a rough balance between supply and demand. Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] 1. Introduction Optical fiber communications was initially developed for the voice phone system. The feverish level of activity that we have experienced since the late 1990s, though, was caused primarily by the rapidly rising demand for Internet connectivity. The Internet has been growing at unprecedented rates. Moreover, because it is versatile and penetrates deeply into the economy, it is affecting all of society, and therefore has attracted inordinate amounts of public attention. The aim of this chapter is to summarize the current state of knowledge about the growth rates of the Internet, with special attention paid to the implications for fiber optic transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • FWWR System Timetable and Special Instructions
    SYSTEM TIMETABLE # 9 Effective 0001 Monday, January 04, 2016 Kevin Erasmus President - Chief Executive Officer Jared Steinkamp Vice President - Chief Operating Officer Justin Sliva Chief Transportation Officer William Parker Chief Engineer John Morrison Chief Mechanical Officer FORT WORTH & WESTERN RAILROAD DIRECTORY Corporate Office 6300 Ridglea Place, Suite 1200 Fort Worth, TX 76116 Phone: (817) 763-8297 Fax: (817) 738-9657 Customer Operations / Service Center Phone: (817) 731-1180 Toll Free: (800) 861-3657 Train Dispatcher Office Main Phone: (817) 738-2445 Emergency Only: (817) 821-6092 Fax: (817) 731-0602 Hodge Switching Yard (Main Yard) 2495 East Long Avenue Fort Worth, TX 76106 Phone: (817) 222-9798 Fax: (817) 222-1409 Dublin Switching Yard 407 E. Blackjack Dublin, Texas 76446 Phone: (254) 445-2177 Fax: (254) 445-4637 Cresson Switching Yard Phone / Fax: (817) 396-4841 8th Ave Switching Yard Phone / Fax: (817) 924-1441 Everman Switching Yard Phone / Fax: (817) 551-3706 Office Mobile President / CEO (817) 529-7140 (817) 223-1828 Vice President / COO (817) 222-9798 (817) 296-9933 Chief Transportation Officer (817) 222-9798 (817) 269-3582 Chief Engineer (817) 222-9798 (817) 201-4450 General Director of Track (817) 222-9798 (817) 821-2342 Chief Mechanical Officer (817) 222-9798 (817) 821-6094 Director of Transportation (817) 222-9798 (817) 235-3734 Gen Director Operating Practices (817) 222-9798 (817) 739-5567 Manager Train Operations (Fort Worth) (817) 222-9798 (817) 312-3429 Senior MTO (Dublin) (254) 445-2785 (817) 235-9713 Roadmaster
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and Isi: Four Decades of Innovation
    THE INTERNET AND ISI: FOUR DECADES OF INNOVATION ROD BECKSTROM President and Chief Executive Officer Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 40th Anniversary of USC Information Sciences Institute 26 April 2012 As prepared for delivery It’s an honor to be here today to mark the 40th anniversary of the University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute. Thank you to Herb Schorr for inviting me to speak with you today and participate in the day’s events. When he steps down he will leave some very large shoes to fill. When I received Herb’s invitation, I seized upon it as an opportunity to come before you to express the sincere gratitude that my colleagues and I feel for the work and support of ISI. When I think of ICANN and its development, and all we have accomplished, I never forget that we stand upon the shoulders of giants, many of whom contributed to my remarks today. In fact, I owe a special debt of gratitude to Bob Kahn, who has been a mentor to me. I am honored that he took the time to walk through a number of details in the history I have been asked to relate. The organizers asked me to speak about the history of ISI and ICANN. They also invited me to talk a bit about the future of the Internet. In my role as President and CEO of ICANN, I have many speaking engagements that are forward looking. They are opportunities to talk about ICANN’s work and how it will usher in the next phase in the history of the global, unified Internet that many of you have helped to create.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2015 Annual Report ANNUAL 2015 REPORT CONTENTS i Letter from the President 4 ii NYSERNet Names New President 6 iii NYSERNet Members Institutions 8 iv Membership Update 9 v Data Center 10 vi VMWare Quilt Project 11 vii Working Groups 12 viii Education Services 13 ix iGlass 14 x Network 16 xi Internet Services 17 xii Board Members 18 xiii Our Staff 19 xiv Human Face of Research 20 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present to you NYSERNet’s 2015 Annual Report. Through more than three decades, NYSERNet’s members have addressed the education and research community’s networking and other technology needs together, with trust in each other guiding us through every transition. This spring inaugurates more change, as City. The terrible attack of Sept. 11, 2001, we welcome a new president and I will step complicated achievement of that goal, made down from that position to focus on the it more essential, and taught a sobering research community’s work and needs. lesson concerning the importance of communication and the need to harden the By itself, working with NYSERNet’s infrastructure that supports it. We invested extraordinary Board and staff to support in a wounded New York City, deploying fiber and building what today has become a global exchange point at “ These two ventures formed pieces 32 Avenue of the Americas. In the process, we forged partnerships in a puzzle that, when assembled, that have proved deep and durable. benefited all of New York and beyond.” Despite inherent risks, and a perception that New York City the collective missions of our members institutions might principally benefit, for the past 18 years has been a privilege NYSERNet’s Board unanimously supported beyond my imagining.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimedia, Internet, On-Line
    Section IV: Multimedia, the Internet, and On-Line Services High-End Digital Video Applications Larry Amiot Electronic and Computing Technologies Division Argonne National Laboratory The emphasis of this paper is on the high-end applications Internet and Intranet that are driving digital video. The research with which I am involved at Argonne National Laboratory is not done on dig- The packet video networks which currently support many ital video per se, but rather on how the research applications applications such as file transfer, Mbone video (talking at the laboratory drive its requirements for digital video. The heads), and World Wide Web browsing are limiting for high- paper will define what digital video is, what some of its com- quality video because of the low throughput one can achieve ponents are, and then discuss a few applications that are dri- via the Internet or intranets. Examples of national packet ving the development of these components. The focus will be switched networks developed in the last several years include on what digital video means to individuals in the research the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNet). The and education community. Department of Energy had its own network called ESNET, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Digital Video Environment (NASA) had a network as well. Recently, the NSFNet was de- commissioned, and commercial interests are now starting to In 1996, a group of people from several universities in the fill that void. Research and education communities are find- Midwest and from Argonne formed a Video Working Group. ing, however, that this new commercial Internet is too re- This body tried to define the areas of digital video of impor- stricting and does not meet their throughput requirements; it tance to their institutions.
    [Show full text]