House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges

Former Members sentenced to imprisonment

Sixteenth Report of Session 2010–12

Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes

Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 June 2011

HC 1215 Published on 15 June 2011 by authority of the House of Commons : The Stationery Office Limited £0.00

The Committee on Standards and Privileges

The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary.

Current membership Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Tom Blenkinsop MP (Labour, Middlesbrough South & East Cleveland) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and North Poole) Rt hon Tom Clarke MP (Labour, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Mr Geoffrey Cox MP (Conservative, Torridge and West Devon) Matthew Hancock MP (Conservative, West Suffolk) Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test)

Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No. 149. In particular, the Committee has power to order the attendance of any Member of Parliament before the Committee and to require that specific documents or records in the possession of a Member relating to its inquiries, or to the inquiries of the Commissioner, be laid before the Committee. The Committee has power to refuse to allow its public proceedings to be broadcast. The Law Officers, if they are Members of Parliament, may attend and take part in the Committee’s proceedings, but may not vote.

Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at: www.parliament.uk/sandp.

Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Eve Samson (Clerk), Richard Kelly (Second Clerk) and Miss Christine McGrane (Committee Assistant).

Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to The Clerk of the Committee on Standards and Privileges, Journal Office, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6615.

Former Members sentenced to imprisonment 1

Contents

Report Page Background 3 Inquiries into former members now convicted 3 Passes of former Members convicted 3 Resettlement Grants 4 Future sanctions 5

Appendix: announcements relating to former Members 6 Mr 6 Mr 6 Mr 7

Formal Minutes 8

Former Members sentenced to imprisonment 3

Report

Background 1. The House of Commons’ system for investigating alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct and imposing sanctions for any such breaches is disciplinary in nature. It is not, and does not purport to be, a substitute for criminal proceedings. There can however be an overlap between actions which are breaches of the Code, and the subject of complaints, and criminal behaviour. Other than in the limited context of participation in proceedings in Parliament, the position of a Member of Parliament is no different in respect of alleged criminal behaviour than that of any other person. Decisions about criminal investigations and prosecutions are matters for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service. A predecessor Committee discussed the handling of complaints against Members which might also raise questions of criminal liability, and reported on the arrangements for liaison between the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, the police and the Committee in April 2008.1 Those arrangements were intended to ensure that the Committee did not inadvertently prejudice criminal proceedings.

Inquiries into former members now convicted 2. In the last Parliament a number of individuals were the subject of police investigations. Mr David Chaytor, Mr , Mr Jim Devine and Mr Elliot Morley have now been convicted on charges relating to their expense claims. Three of these, Mr Chaytor, Mr Devine, and Mr Morley were under investigation by the Commissioner.

3. We have already announced that we have agreed to the Commissioner’s proposals that he should close his inquiries into Mr Chaytor and Mr Devine. The Commissioner has also proposed that he should close his inquiry into Mr Morley. We agree. The announcements made on each decision are set out in the Appendix to this Report.

Passes of former Members convicted 4. When we announced that our agreement that the investigation into Mr Chaytor’s conduct should be closed, we added:

the Chair of the Committee, Kevin Barron MP, has written to Sir Alan Haselhurst MP, the Chair of the Administration Committee, inviting it to consider whether the rules relating to passes for former Members should be amended, to disqualify automatically any former Member who has been convicted of a criminal offence and has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment.2

Sir Alan has now responded:

1 Standards and Privileges Committee, Eight Report of Session 2007–08, The Complaints System and the Criminal Law, HC 523 2 See Appendix

4 Former Members sentenced to imprisonment

The Committee recommended on 24 April that the following paragraph be included in the rules operated by the Serjeant at Arms:

“Former Members’ passes should not be provided to any Member convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to a period of imprisonment of one year or more.”

Mr Speaker has accepted that recommendation, and I have accordingly asked the Serjeant to incorporate that passage within the rules.

This decision means that Mr Chaytor, Mr Devine, Mr Illsley and Mr Morley will not be entitled to passes.

5. Section 1 of the Representation of the People Act 19813 provides:

A person found guilty of one or more offences (whether before or after the passing of this Act and whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere), and sentenced or ordered to be imprisoned or detained indefinitely or for more than one year, shall be disqualified for membership of the House of Commons while detained anywhere in the British Islands or the Republic of Ireland in pursuance of the sentence or order or while unlawfully at large at a time when he would otherwise be so detained.

6. The change to the rules means that the House’s rules on the terms of access to the precincts for former Members are slightly different from the rules relating to disqualification of sitting Members convicted of an offence. This is appropriate: a judge sentencing a Member of Parliament will be alert to the terms of the Representation of the People Act 1981, and take into account that automatic expulsion depends on a sentence of more than a year. The House can take its own decision if a sentence of less than a year is given, and the Member concerned does not resign voluntarily.

7. Access to the precincts, and the terms on which such access is granted, is and should be, purely a matter for the House; there is no statutory provision relating to such access. Any such provision would be inappropriate, since it would limit the House’s control over its own precincts. Given that sentencing guidelines are written in terms of “12 months” imprisonment, reproducing the statutory requirement exactly when considering the provision of ex-Members’ passes could result in former Members found guilty of wrongdoing serious enough to merit a significant custodial sentence retaining their entitlement to a pass unless the House took further action. We do not believe this is right.

Resettlement Grants 8. Until the most recent general election, the House of Commons had a system of resettlement grants for those Members who retired at dissolution, or were not returned at the subsequent election.4 Since the IPSA expenses scheme came into operation on 7 May 2010 there has been no provision for resettlement grants. IPSA has announced:

3 1981, c 34 4 CJ (1990–91), Members Estimate Committee, Third Report of Session 2007–08, Review of Allowances, HC 578–I, paras 235–238

Former Members sentenced to imprisonment 5

Given its integral link to MPs’ pay and pensions, IPSA does not believe it can properly consider the issue of whether there should be a resettlement grant or how it should be formulated as a separate issue. IPSA will not, therefore, introduce an interim measure but will consider the issue as part of its planned review of MPs’ pay and pensions once the legal responsibility for those matters passes to IPSA.5

9. On 8 February 2010 the Members Estimates Committee6 agreed that “Mr Speaker should instruct the Accounting Officer for the Members Estimate that Resettlement Grant should be withheld from any Member charged with an offence relating to Members’ allowances until the conclusion of any criminal proceedings”;7 on 29 March 2011 it further agreed “that Resettlement Grant should not be paid to any former Member convicted of an offence of dishonesty relating to Members’ allowances.”8

Future sanctions 10. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards is charged with the responsibility for conducting inquiries. He must judge each case on its own merits, and it is impossible to set out an absolute rule. Nonetheless, as a general principle, if in the future the Commissioner proposes to close inquiries into the conduct of former Members who have received substantial custodial sentences, we are likely to agree. In cases where a former Member has both been imprisoned, and is consequently no longer entitled to the privilege of an ex-Member’s photo-pass, it is unlikely that this Committee will have any further sanction to impose.

5 IPSA, Annual Review of the Expenses Scheme 2010–11, 25 March 2011 6 The Committee has the same membership as the House of Commons Commission, and its decisions can be found on the Commission’s webpages. 7 http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/commons/house-of-commons-commission/minutes, CJ (2009– 10) 216 8 http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/commons/house-of-commons-commission/minutes/

6 Former Members sentenced to imprisonment

Appendix: announcements relating to former Members

Mr David Chaytor 25 January 2011

The Committee has agreed to a proposal from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards that he should close his inquiry into allegations referred to him by Mr Chaytor in May 2009. The Commissioner’s inquiry was suspended immediately it began, on 19 May 2009, to await the outcome of possible criminal proceedings. Mr Chaytor was convicted of a criminal offence on 3 December 2010 and was sentenced to 18 months in prison on 7 January 2011.

The Committee will decide at a later date whether it should recommend to the House any action consequent on Mr Chaytor’s conviction and sentence. Meanwhile, the Chair of the Committee, Kevin Barron MP, has written to Sir Alan Haselhurst MP, the Chair of the Administration Committee, inviting it to consider whether the rules relating to passes for former Members should be amended, to disqualify automatically any former Member who has been convicted of a criminal offence and has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment.9

Mr Jim Devine 24 May 2011

The Committee has agreed to a proposal from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards that he should close his inquiry into allegations of misconduct relating to misuse of mileage allowances by Mr Jim Devine. Other allegations relating to expenses have been addressed in criminal proceedings, and Mr Devine has received a substantial prison sentence. The Committee agrees that it is not proportionate to mount an inquiry into a further aspect of his expenses, particularly as the allegation of misuse of mileage allowance has already been dealt with by an Employment Tribunal.

The Commissioner received a complaint on 14 May 2009 that Mr Devine failed to pass on mileage costs, paid under his parliamentary expenses, incurred by his office manager. This inquiry was accepted, but was suspended in August 2009, after the Metropolitan Police Service had informed the Commissioner that they would undertake an investigation into aspects of Mr. Devine’s expense claims. On 14 October 2010, judgment was given in an Employment Tribunal in Scotland on his mileage claims. Mr Devine is now bankrupt, and a sequestrator has been appointed by the Scottish courts. On 10 February 2011 Mr Devine was convicted on two counts of false accounting. On 31 March 2011 he was sentenced to

9 http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/standards-and-privileges- committee/news/mr-david-chaytor/

Former Members sentenced to imprisonment 7

16 months in custody. Mr Devine was deselected and barred by his party from standing as its candidate in the 2010 election.10

Mr Elliot Morley 14 June 2011

The Committee has agreed to a proposal from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards that he should close his inquiry into allegations of misconduct relating to Mr Elliot Morley. Allegations relating to Mr Morley’s expense claims have been addressed in criminal proceedings and Mr Morley has received a substantial prison sentence. The Committee agrees it is not proportionate to proceed with a further inquiry.

Mr Morley referred himself to the Commission following reports in on 14 May 2009. The Committee agreed that the Commissioner should accept this self referral, but that the investigation should be suspended until the police had decided what action to take on the allegations. Following police investigations, on 7 April 2011 Mr Morley pleaded guilty to two charges of false accounting under the Theft Act 1968, relating to claims he had made for the repayment of mortgage interest. On 20 May Mr Morley was sentenced to 16 months imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently.11

10 http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/standards-and-privileges- committee/news/mr-jim-devine/ 11 http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/standards-and-privileges- committee/news/mr-elliot-morley/

8 Former Members sentenced to imprisonment

Formal Minutes

Tuesday 14 June 2011

Members present:

Mr Kevin Barron, in the Chair

Sir Paul Beresford Oliver Heald Tom Blenkinsop Heather Wheeler Annette Brooke Dr Alan Whitehead Matthew Hancock

Draft Report (Former Members sentenced to imprisonment), proposed by the Chair, brought up and read.

Ordered, That the Chair’s draft Report be read a second time, paragraph by paragraph.

Paragraph 1 read, amended and agreed to.

Paragraphs 2 and 3 read and agreed to.

Paragraph 4 read, amended and agreed to.

Paragraphs 5 to 10 read and agreed to.

One paper was appended to the Report.

Resolved, That the Report, as amended, be the Sixteenth Report of the Committee to the House.

Ordered, That the Chair make the Report to the House.

[Adjourned till Tuesday 28 June at 9.30 am