Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A Windfall for Social and Environmental Justice’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A Windfall for Social and Environmental Justice’ cDIREoCTIONmFOR THE pass DEMOCRATIC LEFT February 2009 Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A windfall for social and environmental justice’ By Gemma Tumelty & Jenna Khalfan Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit Introduction & Contents Rising energy and fuel prices are affecting everyone but it's the poorest and those on fixed incomes who are paying the heaviest price for the essentials of life - light and heat. This situation is unsustainable and should be challenged. Compass believes that the moment is right for the government to levy a sensible one off windfall tax on the energy and oil companies to guarantee social and environmental justice for the common good of people living today and for future generations. The government can move quickly and decisively now - but it needs to know that this is what the people want. We have developed a toolkit to help you campaign locally and nationally to have your say in this important debate. Contents 1. Briefing questions and answers 2. Key statistics 3. Campaign aims and actions 4. What you can do locally a. Get local Labour Party, Students’ Union and trade union support b. How to Lobby your MP c. Local media d. energy companies 5. Building a local coalition: pensioners groups, anti-poverty groups, church groups, fuel poverty groups, single parent networks etc Appendix 1. Who supports a windfall tax 2. Model letter to MPs 3. Model letter to the Chancellor Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit www.compassonline.org.uk PAGE 1 1. Briefing questions agreed to raise this to a £150 million a be particularly targeted at families in or and answers year by 2010, with the rate of price rises facing fuel poverty. However the best this is nowhere near good enough - every strategy to eliminate fuel poverty forever 10% increase in energy prices mean an is to ensure every home is insulated and Use the information below to inform extra 400,000 people go into fuel poverty. energy efficient to the highest standards. people about the arguments for a Therefore much of the money raised windfall tax. This is coupled with a lack of investment should be used to kick-start a national in securing sustainable energy supplies for programme of home energy efficiency and Why is a windfall tax important? future generations, which is essential if we installing renewable energy, starting with Rising energy and fuel prices have become are to stabilise energy prices for the the homes of the fuel poor. the political issue, affecting family in the longer term. By 2020 the UK wants 15% country. It’s absolutely right that the of all energy to be from renewable Used in the right way this could benefit corporations who are benefiting sources, this is currently only 2%. Huge the UK economy as a whole - just as the inextricably from that original investment increased investment is urgently needed if New Deal in 1997 created new jobs for and the later privatisation pay their fair the government is to meet its target. the long term unemployed, such an share to society. Compass believes that it’s investment could see the creation of now vital for the government to come out Hasn’t British Gas just agreed to cut hundreds of thousands of new jobs in decisively in favour of a windfall tax to prices by 10%? renewable energy production, insulation, guarantee social and environmental justice Yes, but since 2000 gas prices have risen building renovation and other sectors. both now and in the future. It is time for by 100% and electricity price have risen by action. 61%, when compared to this, 10% is Hasn’t the Government committed to an clearly not enough. Energy companies are energy package. Has a windfall tax been proposed before? likely to continue report profit increases Yes, and whilst the £300 million a year Yes. A similar windfall tax was levied when over the next 12 months, so Compass over 3 years (£900 million) is very the Labour government first came to want to see a sensible one off windfall tax welcome, it is already clear that this is not power in 1997 on the unearned profits of to ensure that we start to tackle fuel enough. According to LGA report ‘switch the newly privatised utilities and raised £5 poverty and guarantee environmental off, switched on’ the government needs to billion; similarly in 1981 the Conservative justice. spend in the region of £5bn on a home government levied a windfall tax on banks insulation scheme to make a real impact. as excessive interest rates led to In the current economic climate, aren’t substantial unearned profits for the main energy companies struggling too? What will happen if the Government clearing banks. In 2008 the spike in the Energy companies have complained that a does not act now? price of oil is now leading to substantial windfall tax would damage their If the government fails to act on this issue, unearned profits for the main oil and businesses. The Privatised plcs/New Deal then the cost to all of us will not energy companies. We therefore call on windfall tax did not damage the just be in the form the government to levy a windfall tax on companies taxed, neither did it allude to of the energy and oil companies. greater borrowing or reduced business investment. What does this have to do with us? The average annual spend on domestic Despite claims of a difficult trading energy per household has now breached environment the profits of the main £1000, and since 2000 Briton’s have faced energy providers have risen from £557 gas price rises of 100% and electricity million in 2003 to now over £3 billion. price rises of 61%. This combined with recent news of vast profits made by oil companies - BP alone The government estimates that 2.5 million is now making £37 million a day in income families are living in fuel poverty, whilst with a 23% increase in profits to £6.7 Energywatch puts the figure at over 4.5 billion for just the first 6 months of 2008. million. It is estimated that 6 million families will be in fuel poverty by 2009 What will the money be used for? and with 3 million facing unemployment Revenues from the tax should be ring- that figure can only rise. Yet despite the fenced to deliver social and environmental billions made in profits, the energy justice for all. Part of the money raised industry spends just £50 million a year should be used to immediately help those combating fuel poverty and has only struggling with rising fuel bills and should compass PAGE 2 www.compassonline.org.uk Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit increased bills through the letter box, Home energy prices are still rising by up Response to BERR report there’ll be a much bigger and longer term to 35% whilst the price of oil is finally price to pay in terms of the social and dropping 12 'Energy suppliers give more direct help to environmental consequences. their most vulnerable customers than any BP alone is now making £37 million a day other industry. Suppliers recently announced 2. Collected Facts & in income with a 23% increase in profits to an extra £225 million for the period 2008 - £6.7 billion for just the first 6 months of 2011 in voluntary contributions, in addition Figures 13 2008 to the £150m already allocated and the £1.4 billion energy efficiency commitment The average annual spend on domestic The government estimates that 2.5 million 14 to help customers most at risk. There is no energy per household has now breached families are living in fuel poverty whilst other industry that spends so much money 1 £1000 Energywatch puts the figure at over 4.5 to reduce demand for its own product' 17 million 15 Since 2000 Briton’s have faced gas price Two million people are already in debt to rises of 100% and electricity price rises of their energy companies 18 61% 2 With every 10% increase in energy prices Profits in the energy "market" have risen 400,000 people go into fuel poverty. The almost six-fold since 2003, from £557 rise in prices since 2004 means the 3 4,5,6,7,8 million to now over £3 billion Government is certain to miss its target of eradicating fuel poverty for vulnerable The "market" is controlled by a monopoly households by 2010.' 19 of the 'Big 6' who control '99% of the 9 electricity market and 100% of gas Labour has reduced fuel poverty from Together, BP, Shell and Centrica made the almost 6.5m households in 1996 to a low equivalent of £1000 profit a second. Almost of around 2m in 2004 20, but numbers are as much as the average domestic energy back on the increase, the last figure for 2005 10 bill put the amount of households in fuel The energy industry spends just £50 poverty at 2.5m 21 Energy companies have consistently put million a year combating fuel poverty14 and the rise in gas prices down to the price of has only agreed to raise this to a £150 The UK target is that by 2020 15% of all 11 16 oil million a year by 2010 energy should come from renewable sources,‘ this is currently only 2%. 22 1 ‘U.K. power bills may rise, adding to inflation woes’ (accessed 31-07-08 - http://www.independent.ie/business/european/uk-power-bills-may-rise-adding-to-inflation-woes-1399941.html) 2 Table 2.1.1, BERR: Quarterly Energy Prices – June 2008 (accessed 31-07-08 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46669.pdf) 3 P24 ‘Business and Enterprise Committee: Energy prices, fuel poverty and Ofgem Eleventh Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I’ (accessed 31-07-08 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmberr/293/293i.pdf) 4 Centrica plc Preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2007 (accessed 31-07-08 http://www.centrica.co.uk/files/results/2007_prelim_results.pdf ) 5 BBC: RWE profits
Recommended publications
  • The Leftist Case for War in Iraq •fi William Shawcross, Allies
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 6 2003 Article 6 Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard Abstract Shawcross is superbly equipped to assess the impact of rogue States and terrorist organizations on global security. He is also well placed to comment on the risks of preemptive invasion for existing alliances and the future prospects for the international rule of law. An analysis of the ways in which the international community has “confronted evil,” Shawcross’ brief polemic argues that U.S. President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were right to go to war without UN clearance, and that the hypocrisy of Jacques Chirac was largely responsible for the collapse of international consensus over the war. His curious identification with Bush and his neoconservative allies as the most qualified to implement this humanitarian agenda, however, fails to recognize essential differences between the leftist case for war and the hard-line justification for regime change in Iraq. BOOK REVIEW VENGEANCE AND EMPIRE: THE LEFTIST CASE FOR WAR IN IRAQ WILLIAM SHAWCROSS, ALLIES: THE U.S., BRITAIN, EUROPE, AND THE WAR IN IRAQ* Hal Blanchard** INTRODUCTION In early 2002, as the war in Afghanistan came to an end and a new interim government took power in Kabul,1 Vice President Richard Cheney was discussing with President George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible for Me to Attend
    Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs. WCA: In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible For Me To Attend Supporter Morgan Freeman, in a personal capacity Your Ref. (My NI No.): WM549438D Dear DWP/Atos Staffer, On Sat 01 June 2013, I was aghast to receive a letter, signed ‘Atos Healthcare’ (sic) and dated Thu 30 May 2013, summoning me to attend what I can only assume is the infamous and discredited ‘Work Capability Assessment’ (WCA) [1] at 15:20 on Fri 14 Jun 2013 at a ‘Marylebone Medical Assessment Centre’. The letter and accompanying pamphlet both neglect to mention the actual name of the assessment I am being summoned to attend. I am currently bumping along the bottom of an episode of severe bipolar clinical depression; so it’s taking an excessively strenuous and stressful amount of mental energy, dogged perseverance, and fitful concentration to overcome the depressive symptomatic urge to just “Bin this rubbish, and face the detrimental consequences later (which is all I deserve anyway, because I’m worthless scum)”, and rather to do the right thing: to explain to the DWP/Atos why I believe this summoning to be in error, immoral, unethical, and impossible for me to attend. So although I am currently at just about my weakest and most vulnerable, and therefore least able to self-advocate in my own best interests, I shall nevertheless take some days to assemble my considered response. Since this considered response message is both thorough and extensive, you may prefer to read it on paper rather than on screen. To that end, I have attached a version formatted for printing on A4 paper: • ‘Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Failure in Afghanistan: Half-Baked Planning Or Pakistan?
    127 US FAILURE IN AFGHANISTAN: HALF-BAKED PLANNING OR PAKISTAN? Muhammad Hashim Zafar Wadhen, Shafei Moiz Hali and Adnan Jamil* Abstract The Global War on Terrorism, launched as a direct result of the heinous 9/11 attacks, has been wagging on for almost two decades with no clear signs of victory for the US. The US on a strategic level has lost the war as the primary opponent, Taliban, holds more territory than ever. The US and NATO coalition not only planned to eradicate terrorism in the country but also had great ambitions to modernize and rebuild the country; however, little has been archived so far. Amidst these harsh realities, Pakistan being a major non-NATO ally is often blamed to sabotage the war efforts by playing a so-called double-game while supporting the Global War on Terrorism on one hand and helping the Taliban on the other. Therefore, this paper investigates the reasons for the US failure in Afghanistan on a macro-level and what role Pakistan has played. Other than the notion that Pakistan is to blame, factors, such as, the US has no real long- term objectives for the war, employing conventional methods of warfare, underestimating the opponent and the terrain, lack of coordination among the NATO member states and the sudden attention shift from Afghanistan to Iraq, played a significant role in the current outcome. After evaluating all the evidence from the last two decades, it is clear that half-baked US planning led to the eventual failure of the war effort. Keywords: GWOT, Pakistan, Taliban, NATO, Terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPASSANNUALREPORT2008-09.Pdf
    PAGE 2 Contents ANNUAL REPORT 2008F09 www.compassonline.org.uk Introduction 3 Members and supporters 5 Local Groups 5 Events 6 Campaigns 9 Research, Policy & Publications 11 E-communications & website 14 Media coverage 14 Compass Youth 15 Other networks 16 Staff and office 16 Management Committee members 17 Donors 17 Financial report 19 Regular gift support/standing order form 20 PAGE 3 Introduction ANNUAL REPORT 2008F09 www.compassonline.org.uk The following report outlines the main work and progress of Compass from March 2008 through to early September 2009. For legal requirements we’re required to file an annual report for the financial year which runs from March-March, for the benefit of members we’ve included an update to September 2009 when this report was written. We are very pleased with the success and achievements of Compass during this past year, which has been the busiest and most proactive 12 months the organisation has ever been though in its 6 years of existence, the flurry of activity and output has been non-stop! Looking back 2008/2009 saw some clear milestone successes both politically and organisationally for Compass. Snap shots include the launch of our revolutionary process to generate new and popular ideas for these changed times with our How To Live In The 21st Century policy competition where we encouraged people to submit and debate policy ideas; to organise meetings in their homes and we ran a series of regional ideas forums across the country - over 200 policies were submitted and then voted on by our members – our biggest ever exercise in membership democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime Twelfth Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 15 September 2004 HC 605 Published on Thursday 7 October 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) (Chairman) Mr Gregory Barker MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Mr Harold Best MP (Labour, Leeds North West) Mr Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Mrs Helen Clark MP (Labour, Peterborough) Sue Doughty MP (Liberal Democrat, Guildford) Mr Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh) Mr John Horam MP (Conservative, Orpington) Mr John McWilliam MP (Labour, Blaydon) Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Mr Malcolm Savidge MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Mr Simon Thomas MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No. 152A. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Varsity Issue
    “If I can’t dance, I don’t want your revolution” Can the arts world do anarchy? The Independent Cambridge Student Newspaper since 1947 | varsity.co.uk | Friday February 23 2007 | Issue 654 »Comment Streeting hangs Why airline environmental policy is pie in the CUSU out to dry sky »Exec members accuse former President of“betrayal” PAGE 9 that I now have responsibilities to ALICE WHITWHAM represent over a hundred other stu- »Features Chief News Editor dent unions. Although I know that EMI boss John my personal position on the matter is Former CUSU President Wes the same as the official NUS man- Gildersleeve Streeting has been accused of “betray- date, the NSS was a never a main ing” his former student union by plank in my manifesto”. talks to current Exec members after changing NUS President Gemma Tumelty Jossie his stance on the inclusion of Cambridge criticised the unwillingness of students in the National Student Cambridge students to participate in Clayton Survey (NSS). Streeting, who initiated the survey. “It only exacerbates the about the worth the CUSU boycott of the survey while reputation Cambridge has of being an President in 2004-5, went before the elitist institution, somehow separate of degrees PAGE 14 Common’s Education Select Committee from others and affected by utterly on Monday February 19 and accused different circumstances, which is not the CUSU policy of “perpetuating the the case”. She believes it is “valuable” old school tie and secret handshake” and for students who enjoy such a reputa- “doing themselves no favours”. tion as that of Cambridge “to be able »Food During his term as CUSU President to feed into a number of organisations Streeting promoted a policy which that make decisions on future stu- Varsity ponders described the government-backed dents’ experience”.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Students Caught in Postal Vote Scandal
    That Friday free thing Leeds St de Friday, May 4, 2007 VOL37:ISSUE 20 Labour students caught in postal vote scandal By Alex Doorey continued involvement with the Leeds certainly be expelled from the Labour branch of the Labour Party_ A party and face criminal charges." he spokesperson for the Lib Dems said said. that they were 'appalled' at the Responding to the Sunday Times MON 4 -SAT 9 JUNE Opposition parties have rounded on 'alleged disgraceful behaviour of allegations. David Crompton. the student Labour movement On Leeds University students whilst out assistant chief constable of West campus over claims that its members canvassing for Labour in Gipton and Yorkshire Police, said: "This is DIRECT FROM THE WEST END have been involved in the alleged Harehills'. extremely sharp practice and a.clear postal vote fraud scandal. These concerns have been echoed breach of the guidelines." tra_ I NG 0 The movement has remained tight- by Liberal Democrat Council Leader Wilson went on to say that. if the fHilu PIM ISIS lipped since allegations were made in Mark Harris. who said: "This is a claims were true. it would reflect the the national press on Sunday that ii disgrace. This matter needs to be difficulties that Labour were facing in I had been involved in the dubious thoroughly investigated." the local elections. collection of postal ballots for Simon Harley, Chairperson of "It is too early to say whether the yesterdays local elections. Leeds Conservative Future, made no allegations are true or not, but if they A spokesperson for the student comment on the counter-accusations are.
    [Show full text]
  • Although Many European Radical Left Parties
    Peace, T. (2013) All I'm asking, is for a little respect: assessing the performance of Britain's most successful radical left party. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(2), pp. 405-424. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/144518/ Deposited on: 21 July 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 2 All I’m asking, is for a little Respect: assessing the performance of Britain’s most successful radical left party BY TIMOTHY PEACE1 ABSTRACT This article offers an overview of the genesis, development and decline of the Respect Party, a rare example of a radical left party which has achieved some degree of success in the UK. It analyses the party’s electoral fortunes and the reasons for its inability to expand on its early breakthroughs in East London and Birmingham. Respect received much of its support from Muslim voters, although the mere presence of Muslims in a given area was not enough for Respect candidates to get elected. Indeed, despite criticism of the party for courting only Muslims, it did not aim to draw its support from these voters alone. Moreover, its reliance on young people and investment in local campaigning on specific political issues was often in opposition to the traditional ethnic politics which have characterised the electoral process in some areas. When the British public awoke on the morning of Friday 6th May 2005 most would have been unsurprised to discover that the Labour Party had clung on to power but with a reduced majority, as had been widely predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Elections 2005 - 2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/50 4 August 2010
    By-elections 2005 - 2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/50 4 August 2010 This research paper provides the results of the 14 by-elections held during the 2005-10 Parliament. Since 2005, 9 of the 14 by-elections have been won by the incumbent party. There has been a net gain to the Conservatives of two seats, after wins in Norwich North, and Crewe and Nantwich; a net gain of one seat to the Liberal Democrats, following a win in Dunfermline and West Fife; and a net gain of one seat to the SNP after victory in Glasgow East. All of these seats were previously held by Labour. Thus, after accounting for their win in Glasgow North East (previously held by former Speaker Michael Martin), Labour saw a net loss of three seats over this period. Kathryn Keith Social and General Statistics Recent Research Papers 10/40 Sudan: peace or war, unity or secession? 02.06.10 10/41 Identity Documents Bill [Bill 1 of 2010-11] 04.06.10 10/42 Progress towards nuclear disarmament? 15.06.10 10/43 Unemployment by Constituency, June 2010 16.06.10 10/44 Local Elections 2010 22.06.10 10/45 The ‘AfPak policy’ and the Pashtuns 22.06.10 10/46 Economic Indicators, July 2010 06.07.10 10/47 Unemployment by Constituency, July 2010 14.07.10 10/48 Academies Bill [HL] [Bill 57 of 2010-11] 15.07.10 10/49 Economic Indicators, August 2010 15.07.10 Research Paper 10/50 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Report 2006
    Congress Report 2006 The 138th annual Trades Union Congress 11-14 September, Brighton 4 Contents Page General Council members 2006 – 2007……………………………… .............4 Section one - Congress decisions………………………………………….........7 Part 1 Resolutions carried.............................. ………………………………………………8 Part 2 Motion remitted………………………………………………… ............................28 Part 3 Motions lost…………………………………………………….. ..............................29 Part 4 Motion withdrawn…………………………………………………………………….29 Part 5 General Council statements…………………………………………………………30 Section two – Verbatim report of Congress proceedings .....................35 Day 1 Monday 11 September ......................................................................................36 Day 2 Tuesday 12 September……………………………………… .................................76 Day 3 Wednesday 13 September...............................................................................119 Day 4 Thursday 14 September ...................................................................................159 Section three - unions and their delegates ............................................183 Section four - details of past Congresses ...............................................195 Section five - General Council 1921 – 2006.............................................198 Index of speakers .........................................................................................203 General Council Members Mark Fysh UNISON 2006 – 2007 Allan Garley GMB Bob Abberley Janice Godrich UNISON Public and Commercial
    [Show full text]