DOCSLIB.ORG

Naval Special Warfare Nwp 3-05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naval Special Warfare Nwp 3-05 NWP 3-05 NAVY WARFARE PUBLICATION NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE NWP 3-05 EDITION MAY 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO URGENT CHANGE/ERRATUM RECORD U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THEIR NUMBER DATE ENTERED BY CONTRACTORS ONLY FOR OPERATIONAL USE TO PROTECT SENSITIVE TECHNICAL DATA OR INFORMATION FROM AUTOMATIC DISSEMINATION. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE APRIL 2013. OTHER REQUESTS SHALL BE REFERRED TO NAVY WARFARE DEVELOPMENT COMMAND, 1528 PIERSEY STREET BLDG O-27 NORFOLK VA 23511-2723 PRIMARY REVIEW AUTHORITY: COMNAVSPECWARCOM 0411LP1136423 1 MAY 2013 NWP 3-05 INTENTIONALLY BLANK MAY 2013 2 NWP 3-05 3 MAY 2013 NWP 3-05 INTENTIONALLY BLANK MAY 2013 4 NWP 3-05 May 2013 PUBLICATION NOTICE ROUTING 1. NWP 3-05 (MAY 2013), NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE, is available in the Navy Warfare Library. It is effective upon receipt. NWP 3-05 supersedes NWP 3-05, Naval Special Warfare (SEP 2009). 2. Summary. NWP 3-05 contains information on the nature, forces, organization, and employment of naval special warfare. This publication is intended for use by military planners and staff officers. Navy Warfare Library Custodian Navy Warfare Library publications must be made readily available to all users and other interested personnel within the U.S. Navy. Note to Navy Warfare Library Custodian This notice should be duplicated for routing to cognizant personnel to keep them informed of changes to this publication. 5 MAY 2013 NWP 3-05 INTENTIONALLY BLANK MAY 2013 6 NWP 3-05 CONTENTS Page No. CHAPTER 1—EVOLUTION OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 NAVAL COMBAT DEMOLITION UNITS ............................................................................... 1-1 1.3 UNDERWATER DEMOLITION TEAMS ................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 SEA-AIR-LAND TEAMS ........................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 SPECIAL BOAT TEAMS ........................................................................................................... 1-5 1.6 SEAL DELIVERY VEHICLE TEAMS ...................................................................................... 1-5 1.7 UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ESTABLISHED .......................... 1-5 1.8 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE FORCE REALIGNMENT ....................................................... 1-6 1.9 AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ ..................................................................................................... 1-7 1.10 GROWTH OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE .......................................................................... 1-7 CHAPTER 2—NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE FORCES AND ORGANIZATION 2.1 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE FORCES .................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND ............................................................................ 2-1 2.3 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUPS .................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUPS ONE AND TWO ..................................................... 2-2 2.4.1 SEAL Teams ................................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.4.2 Logistics Support Units ONE and TWO ...................................................................................... 2-3 2.4.3 Mobile Communications Team .................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUP THREE ...................................................................... 2-5 2.5.1 SEAL Delivery Vehicle Team ONE ............................................................................................ 2-5 2.5.2 Logistic Support Unit THREE ..................................................................................................... 2-6 2.5.3 Training Detachment THREE ...................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUP FOUR ........................................................................ 2-7 2.6.1 Special Boat Teams ...................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6.2 Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School .................................................... 2-7 2.7 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUP TEN ........................................................................... 2-8 7 MAY 2013 NWP 3-05 Page No. 2.7.1 Support Activity ONE and TWO ................................................................................................. 2-8 2.7.2 Naval Special Warfare Mission Support Center .......................................................................... 2-9 2.7.3 Cultural Engagement Unit ............................................................................................................ 2-9 2.7.4 Naval Special Warfare Anchor Teams ......................................................................................... 2-9 2.8 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE GROUP ELEVEN ................................................................... 2-9 2.9 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE UNITS .................................................................................... 2-12 2.10 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE CENTER ................................................................................ 2-12 2.10.1 Basic Training Command ........................................................................................................... 2-12 2.10.2 Advanced Training Command ................................................................................................... 2-12 2.11 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE DEVELOPMENT GROUP ................................................... 2-12 2.12 CENTER FOR SEAL TEAM AND SPECIAL WARFARE COMBATANT–CRAFT CREWMAN ............................................................................................................................... 2-12 CHAPTER 3—COMMAND AND CONTROL 3.1 GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Persistent and Episodic Requirements .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Joint Chiefs of Staff Exercises ..................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Contingency Plan Execution ........................................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.4 Counterterrorism Execute Order .................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1 Assigned Forces ........................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Attached Forces ............................................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.3 Allocated Forces ........................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.4 Geographic Combatant Commander Authority ............................................................................ 3-3 3.2.5 United States Special Operations Command Authority ............................................................... 3-3 3.2.6 Combatant Command ................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.7 Operational Control ...................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.8 Tactical Control ............................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.2.9 Administrative Control ................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.10 Support Relationships ................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.11 Coordinating Authority ................................................................................................................ 3-5 3.2.12 Direct Liaison Authorized ............................................................................................................ 3-5 3.3 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE DEPLOYMENT ROTATION ................................................. 3-5 3.4 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE TASK ORGANIZATION CHAIN OF COMMAND .............. 3-5 3.5 THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION EVENTS .................................................................. 3-7 3.6 NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE TASK ORGANIZATION COMPONENTS ............................ 3-7 3.7 COMMAND AND CONTROL ................................................................................................... 3-7 3.7.1 Naval Special Warfare Task Force ............................................................................................... 3-7 3.7.2 Naval Special Warfare Task Group .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Navy Diver
    U.S. Navy Diver Requirements, Training and Rate Information for Navy Diver (ND) Updated: May 2016 Job Description: Navy Diver’s (ND) conduct and supervise diving operations using all types of underwater breathing apparatus which include open circuit SCUBA, closed and semi­closed mixed gas underwater breathing apparatus, surface supplied air and mixed gas diving systems and equipment and saturation diving systems. Their duties include use of explosive demolitions, small arms proficiency and (command specific) parachute operations. The NAVY DIVER (ND) rating performs multiple missions depending on the command a member is assigned. Salvage Operations: Navy Divers perform open ocean, harbor and combat/expeditionary ​ salvage operations. These operations are conducted in water up to 300 feet deep and range from salvaging entire ships and aircraft to recovering debris spread over miles of ocean floor using state of the art mixed­gas diving systems, high­tech ROV equipment and explosives for clearing channels and waterways. Battle Damage and Ship Repair Operations: Highly ​ complex underwater repairs to surface ships and submarines is a mainstay of the Navy Diver. Ships damaged in battle or requiring maintenance must be fixed to keep the fleet operational. From placing cofferdams for flood prevention during repairs to replacing 80 ton ship propellers, if it's under the waterline, Navy Divers are called to complete the job. Battle Damage and Ship repair operations require the use of state of the art diving equipment, underwater cutting and welding, Non­Destructive testing, digital video equipment, complex rigging operations, hydraulic tool systems and precision demolition materials. Special Warfare Supporting Operations: A growing area of the ​ Navy Diving field is supporting the underwater operations of the SO and EOD communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacetime Espionage, International Law and the Existence of Customary Exceptions I˜Naki Navarrete† & Russell Buchan‡
    \\jciprod01\productn\C\CIN\51-4\CIN403.txt unknown Seq: 1 8-APR-19 15:07 Out of the Legal Wilderness: Peacetime Espionage, International Law and the Existence of Customary Exceptions I˜naki Navarrete† & Russell Buchan‡ This Article demonstrates that peacetime espionage does not benefit from permissive customary international law exceptions. The mainstream view contends that, though peacetime espionage may contravene interna- tional law, developments in customary international law (CIL) nevertheless undercut State responsibility for such conduct. The gist of this view is that acts of espionage benefit from permissive CIL exceptions because its prac- tice is widespread and accepted within the international society. However, the mainstream literature has rarely— if ever— meaningfully engaged with the practice of espionage in an effort to tease out the objective and subjec- tive elements supportive of customary espionage exceptions. This Article closes this gap and debunks the mainstream view. We show that, although widespread, most acts of espionage are committed in secret and, as such, they cannot qualify as State practice for the purpose of CIL formation. We further demonstrate that States have failed to issue expressions of the sub- jective element in support of customary espionage exceptions. We con- clude by suggesting that, while States are entitled to develop customary espionage exceptions in the future, for now they have yet to come out of the legal wilderness. Introduction ..................................................... 898 R I. International Law and Peacetime Espionage............... 901 R A. Principle of Territorial Sovereignty ..................... 905 R B. Law of the Sea ........................................ 909 R C. Diplomatic and Consular Law ......................... 910 R II. Customary Exceptions and Peacetime Espionage .........
    [Show full text]
  • And Financial Implications of Unmanned
    Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources MASSACHUsf TTT IMef0hrE OF TECHNOLOGY by Richard Winston Larson MAY 0 8 201 S.B. Engineering LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2014 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. 2) Author Dep.atment of Mechanical Engineering nuaryL5.,3014 Certified by.... Y Douglas P. Hart Professor of Mechanical Engineering Tbesis Supervisor A ccepted by ....................... ........ David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources by Richard Winston Larson Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on January 15, 2014, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract The naval warfare environment is rapidly changing. The U.S. Navy is adapting by continuing its blue-water dominance while simultaneously building brown-water ca- pabilities. Unmanned systems, such as unmanned airborne drones, are proving piv- otal in facing new battlefield challenges. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) are emerging as the Navy's seaborne equivalent of the Air Force's drones. Representing a low-end disruptive technology relative to traditional shipborne operations, UUVs are becoming capable of taking on increasingly complex roles, tipping the scales of battlefield entropy. They improve mission outcomes and operate for a fraction of the cost of traditional operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Data
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Houston, Texas 77058 Space Administration January 2016 CHRISTOPHER J. CASSIDY (CAPTAIN, U.S. NAVY) NASA ASTRONAUT Video Q&A with Christopher PERSONAL DATA: Born in 1970 in Salem, Massachusetts. Considers York, Maine, to be his hometown. EDUCATION: Graduated from York High School, York, Maine; completed Naval Academy Prep School, Newport, Rhode Island, 1989; received a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, U.S. Naval Academy, 1993; received a Master of Science in Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000, Honorary PHD from Hussein University, 2015. ORGANIZATIONS: U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alumni Association; Fraternal Order of Underwater Demoliton Team (UDT)/Sea, Air, Land Team (SEAL) Association. Click photo for downloadable high-res version SPECIAL HONORS: Honor graduate of Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) Class 192; awarded the Bronze Star with combat ‘V’ and Presidential Unit Citation for leading a nine-day operation at the Zharwar Kili cave complex on the Afghanistan/Pakistan border; guest speaker at the U.S. Naval Academy Combat Leadership Seminar, 2003 & 2004; awarded a second Bronze Star for combat leadership service in Afghanistan, 2004; Recipient of NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal. Finisher in the Ironman World Championship triathlon in Kona, Hawaii, 2014. MILITARY EXPERIENCE: Ten years as a member of the U.S. Navy SEALs Team. He made four six-month deployments: two to Afghanistan, and two to the Mediterranean. Cassidy served as Executive Officer and Operations Officer of Special Boat Team Twenty in Norfolk, Virginia, and SEAL platoon commander at SEAL Team THREE in Coronado, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Jungle Operations International Course – Guidelines to Candidates
    Jungle Operations International Course – Guidelines to Candidates ANNEX E – STUDENTS’S PREPARATION FOR THE DOCTRINAL INTERACTION GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE STUDENTS’S PREPARATION – CIOS 2018 The Doctrinal Interaction will take place on 03 (three) distinct days, and each day a specific block of issues will be dealt with in the jungle environment. During the selection process, still in the country of origin, the future student should receive, through the Military Attaché of his country, the subjects that will be addressed in the Doctrinal Interaction. Each subject contains requests with questions that must be answered and presented by the student in the Doctrinal Interaction. The requests, requisites, maps, letters and information required to resolve the requests are contained in the body of this document. Each student must answer all the questions of the requests in a single document in the ".doc" format and also in a single file in the ".ppt" format. These files must be recorded in a flash drive or CD – Rom and brought to CIGS with the student. A military from the Doctrinal and Research Division will collect the files on the first day of the Mobilization Week at CIGS. During the Doctrinal Interaction each student should present the answers to the questions as follows: - On the 1st day the student will have 30 min to present the requests 1, 2, 3 and 4. - On the 2nd day the student will have 30 min to present 5, 6, 7 and 8. - On the 3rd day the student will have 30 minutes to present the requests 9 and 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy RPA Comments- Through 12/18/2020
    Navy RPA Comments- through 12/18/2020 I object to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training. There are serious problems with the proposal. Allowing the Navy to use our State Parks for training would further militarize our society, taking over a large number of parks (29) for military training. We use our parks for peace, solitude, getting back to nature, getting in tune with our family and ourselves. There is no need to use these spaces. Stop, just stop. This is a terrible idea. I firmly object. This is wrong. Stop.1 The Navy has and continues to destroy our state and national parks, our homes, environment, wildlife and communities with toxic jet noise and war games. Our State Parks are for us the Citizens, not military war games. Just say no to the Bullish Toxic Navy.2 I OBJECT to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training! There are serious problems with the proposal. Allowing the Navy to use our State Parks for training would further militarize our society, taking over a large number of parks (29) for military training. One of the key responsibilities for civil authorities is to tell the military when enough is enough. Just say NO to using public parks for military training!3 In these days of great division in our civil society, we don't need stealthy men in camo uniforms toting toy guns around our State and County Parks. People frequent parks to escape tension, not to encounter more. Keep the Navy commando training out of our parks!4 Please don’t let the military train in our parks.5 I am vehemently opposed to allowing military training in our 29 public parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV)
    Updated June 10, 2021 Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) What Is the Advanced Reconnaissance anti-armor capability to defeat close-in heavy armor Vehicle (ARV)? threats; According to the Marine Corps, the Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) aims to be a new armored precision-guided munitions (PGMs) to defeat threats vehicle family to replace the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) beyond the engagement range of threat systems; (Figure 1): Since the 1980s, the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) unmanned systems swarm capability to provide persistent, multifunction munitions; has supported Marine Air-Ground Task Force missions on the battlefield. While the LAV remains advanced, networked, multifunctional electronic warfare operationally effective, the life cycle of this system (EW ) capabilities; is set to expire in the mid-2030s…. The Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) [the LAV’s a modern command-and-control suite and a full range of replacement] will be highly mobile, networked, sensors to enhance and extend reconnaissance and transportable, protected, and lethal. The capability surveillance ranges; will provide, sensors, communication systems and lethality options to overmatch threats that have organic unmanned aerial and ground systems historically been addressed with more heavily (UAS/UGS) that can be deployed from the ARV; armored systems. The ARV will be an advanced combat vehicle system, capable of fighting for active and passive vehicle protection capabilities to information that balances competing capability sense, orient, classify, track, and defeat incoming demands to sense, shoot, move, communicate and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), anti-tank guided remain transportable as part of the naval missiles (ATGMs), and PGM threats with hard-and soft- expeditionary force.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chelonia Mydas) in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL Assessing temporal and spatial patterns in habitat use of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Ana Rita Marcelino Teresa Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação orientada por: Professor Doutor Tiago A. Marques Doutor Sean F. Hanser 2021 Acknowledgments Personally, I wish to thank everyone whose assistance was essential to the development of this thesis. I am extremely thankful to my professor and supervisor Tiago Marques, who started by proposing this Hawaiian marine turtle data, which would one day become my thesis. I want to thank you for all the encouragement, permanent support and scientific guidance you have provided during this time as your student. Your enthusiasm and constant motivation words were precious, thank you! I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Sean Hanser, for all the support given during this path. Thank you very much for your wonderful advices and guidance, which helped me through all of this thesis. I would like to express a special appreciation to Andrew DiMatteo, Marta Rufino and Soraia Pereira, for advices provided that enriched this work. I also want to thank all the professors that inspired me during my academic life. A realização deste trabalho não teria sido possível sem a motivação das pessoas que me são mais queridas. Como tal, quero agradecer à minha família e aos meus amigos. À minha família e, em especial, à minha mãe e avós, por todo o incentivo e carinho durante este percurso. Sempre me ouviram, se preocuparam e mostraram interesse pelo meu trabalho.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-SOF Training Part 4: “Water”
    ISSUE SIXTY-SEVEN March 2008 Pre-SOF Training Part 4: “Water” Phase Robert Ord page 1 Nutrition The Teeter-Totter Nicole Carroll page 8 Technique Part 2: Q&A Greg Glassman page 9 Good Coach, Bad Coach Mark Eaton page 10 Mobility in Design A Portable Pull-Up Structure Doug Chapman page 11 Good Hormones, Bad Hormones The Energy Balance Equation Tony Leyland page 13 Getting Started in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Becca Borawski page 16 Scaling Down CrossFit Workouts with Rings Tyler Hass page 19 Pre-SOF Training Pat’s Oly Workout: Snatch page 22 Part 4: “Water” Phase Mike Burgener Robert Ord On the Safety and In the first block of our pre-SOF (Special Operations Forces) training program, Efficacy of Overhead known as Selection, trainees were introduced to the rigors of CrossFit combined Lifting with SOF-style training. During the “Indoc” phase, the slow and gradual ramping Greg Glassman, Mark Rippetoe, up of intensity allowed for bodies and minds to safely become accustomed to Lon Kilgore, Kelly Starrett, Daniel physical work efforts with short bursts of extreme workloads. In the second phase, Crumback, Paul Benfanti page 23 “Assessment,” the intensity was ratcheted up significantly and minimum standards were put in place to ensure that the trainees who were allowed to continue on in Media Tips, #1 Tony Budding training were strong enough to move into the more SOF-skills-oriented training of page 30 our second block, which we call Preparation. Speal on Wrestling continued page ... 2 Chris Spealler page 31 CrossFit Journal • Issue Sixty-Seven • March
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft
    U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft Jeffrey Nelson US Air Force Fellow July 15, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44108 c11173008 . U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft Summary The fleet of manned aircraft accomplishing the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Command and Control (C2) and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions for the joint military community (E-8, E-3, RC-135, WC-135, OC-135, and E-6) is primarily based on Boeing 707 aircraft procured from the 1960s to the early 1990s. As the age of these legacy C2ISR aircraft increases, understanding the Air Force and Navy modernization and recapitalization plans is likely important for Congress. This report examines the Air Force’s and Navy’s current sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization efforts for these Boeing 707-based aircraft, and issues Congress may take into account when considering appropriating funds for continued sustainment and modernization of these aircraft versus funding for recapitalization of these missions to new aircraft. This report addresses potential congressional oversight and appropriations concerns for the sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization of the DOD’s Boeing 707-based legacy C2ISR aircraft fleet. It does not address options for recapitalization currently being offered by industry to other countries. Congress has the authority to approve, reject, or modify Air Force and Navy funding requests for C2ISR aircraft sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization, as well as oversight of the nation’s C2ISR requirements and capabilities. Congress’s decisions on appropriations for the C2ISR force could impact the nation’s C2ISR capabilities and have additional consequences for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, Volume 2, Chapter
    Military Diving Operations and Medical Support Chapter 31 MILITARY DIVING OPERATIONS AND MEDICAL SUPPORT † RICHARD D. VANN, PHD*; AND JAMES VOROSMARTI, JR, MD INTRODUCTION BREATH-HOLD DIVING CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OXYGEN TOXICITY IN COMBAT DIVERS UNDERWATER BREATHING APPARATUS Open-Circuit Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus: The Aqualung Surface-Supplied Diving Closed-Circuit Oxygen Scuba Semiclosed Mixed-Gas Scuba Closed-Circuit, Mixed-Gas Scuba THE ROLE OF RESPIRATION IN DIVING INJURIES Carbon Dioxide Retention and Dyspnea Interactions Between Gases and Impaired Consciousness Individual Susceptibility to Impaired Consciousness DECOMPRESSION PROCEDURES No-Stop (No-Decompression) Dives In-Water Decompression Stops Surface Decompression Repetitive and Multilevel Diving Dive Computers Nitrogen–Oxygen Diving Helium–Oxygen and Trimix Diving Omitted Decompression Flying After Diving and Diving at Altitude The Safety of Decompression Practice SATURATION DIVING Atmospheric Control Infection Hyperbaric Arthralgia Depth Limits Decompression THERMAL PROTECTION AND BUOYANCY TREATMENT OF DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS AND ARTERIAL GAS EMBOLISM Therapy According to US Navy Treatment Tables Decompression Sickness in Saturation Diving MEDICAL STANDARDS FOR DIVING SUBMARINE RESCUE AND ESCAPE SUMMARY *Captain, US Navy Reserve (Ret); Divers Alert Network, Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology, Box 3823, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 †Captain, Medical Corps, US Navy (Ret); Consultant in Occupational, Environmental, and Undersea Medicine, 16 Orchard Way South, Rockville, Maryland 20854 955 Military Preventive Medicine: Mobilization and Deployment INTRODUCTION Divers breathe gases and experience pressure land) teams and two SEAL delivery vehicle (SDV) changes that can cause different injuries from those teams. SEALs are trained for reconnaissance and encountered by most combatant or noncombatant direct action missions at rivers, harbors, shipping, military personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns Robert J
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Faculty Publications and Research CGU Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2016 Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns Robert J. Bunker Claremont Graduate University Alma Keshavarz Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Bunker, R. J. (2016). Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns. Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO), 1-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns ROBERT J. BUNKER and ALMA KESHAVARZ August 2016 Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered.
    [Show full text]