DOCSLIB.ORG

Navy RPA Comments- Through 12/18/2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Navy RPA Comments- Through 12/18/2020 Navy RPA Comments- through 12/18/2020 I object to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training. There are serious problems with the proposal. Allowing the Navy to use our State Parks for training would further militarize our society, taking over a large number of parks (29) for military training. We use our parks for peace, solitude, getting back to nature, getting in tune with our family and ourselves. There is no need to use these spaces. Stop, just stop. This is a terrible idea. I firmly object. This is wrong. Stop.1 The Navy has and continues to destroy our state and national parks, our homes, environment, wildlife and communities with toxic jet noise and war games. Our State Parks are for us the Citizens, not military war games. Just say no to the Bullish Toxic Navy.2 I OBJECT to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training! There are serious problems with the proposal. Allowing the Navy to use our State Parks for training would further militarize our society, taking over a large number of parks (29) for military training. One of the key responsibilities for civil authorities is to tell the military when enough is enough. Just say NO to using public parks for military training!3 In these days of great division in our civil society, we don't need stealthy men in camo uniforms toting toy guns around our State and County Parks. People frequent parks to escape tension, not to encounter more. Keep the Navy commando training out of our parks!4 Please don’t let the military train in our parks.5 I am vehemently opposed to allowing military training in our 29 public parks. This practice is absolutely in opposition with the mission and regulations of our State Park system and puts public safety at risk. The Navy has sufficient land to practice spying with realistic looking weapons without putting actual civilians who are uninformed in harms way. This is ludicrous when weapons are not allowed in our parks! Military training in our public parks does not meet the stated goals for parks to care for state resources and provide recreational access to the public. Please do not allow this proposal to go forward.6 I am the daughter of a navy commander from WWII. I am opposed to using our park system for wargames. In addition to the risks posed to frequent walkers, dogs, forest wildlife, and fragile eco- systems, outdoor recreation has become essential for safe activities in the covid19 pandemic. The navy owns property on Indian Island etc with similar land and sea approaches for necessary training.7 The Navy has plenty of other places to train, many of them right next to the parks they want to use. This is inconsistent with mission, vision and core values not to mention the regulations of the State Park system and has a real potential for harm. I AM SAYING NO TO USING PUBLIC PARKS FOR MILITARY TRAINING. The people have already said this.8 As lifelong residents of Washington state we are against the Navy being allowed to use our state parks for military training purposes. The mission of our state parks is caring for state resources for the recreation of citizens not providing a training ground for military exercises. It is a bad precedent to set. We don’t want to be part of an exercise where we are being “spied on” by people carrying “fake” weapons for whatever purpose they conjure up. Please deny this request.9 Do not allow Navy training involving unknowing citizens in Washington State Parks!10 Hello, I strongly object to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training. The state parks are for the benefit and enjoyment of the people and for the care of the natural beauty and wildlife. The Navy's proposal does not meet the standard and needs to be rejected, furthermore: • Allowing the Navy to use any State Park for training would further militarize our society. • The Navy has plenty of other places to train. Navy RPA Comments- through 12/18/2020 • There is very real potential for harm to result from the activities the Navy is proposing. • Trainees will be carrying realistic looking fake weapons. This would clearly be problematic in our parks, where weapons are not allowed. • Having military training activities in our parks is inconsistent with the mission, vision, and core values of the State Park system. • Having military training activities in our parks is inconsistent with State Park regulations.11 I don't want this to spoil my time in our state parks. To quote from the assistant director of State Parks, the mission is “to care for state resources and provide recreational access to the public.” This proposal does not meet that standard and needs to be rejected. To quote from a letter to the editor: "One of the key responsibilities for civil authorities is to tell the military when enough is enough. It the citizens don’t put limits on military activities, expansion will never cease. It is up to us, the citizenry, to take that stand and draw the appropriate line. It is not unpatriotic or disrespectful to set limits on the military – it is our responsibility. Just say NO to using public parks for military training."12 I'm writing to let you know of my objection to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training as described by the 2/11/20 article in the South Whidbey Record newspaper. While I would object at any time to the use of our state parks for military practice exercises where the Navy carries apparent weapons and spies on park users, during these times of increased awareness of abuses of power and spread of conspiracy theories, it is reckless and irresponsible. My family was been involved with CERT disaster preparedness practices, and it is possible to carry out practice exercises AND be transparent to the public.13 I have just learned that the Navy wants to use our parks for training. I am opposed to this for the following reasons: The Navy has plenty of other places to train, many of them right next to the parks they want to use. When challenged, they admitted that it was the presence of civilians on whom they could spy that made the parks desirable. Many park users have real and reasonable objections to being spied on. There is very real potential for harm to result from the activities the Navy is proposing. Although the Navy claims to alert park staff and local law enforcement before an activity, in the five years they have used five parks they have never actually done that. Trainees will be carrying realistic looking fake weapons. This would clearly be problematic in our parks, where weapons are not allowed. Having military training activities in our parks is inconsistent with the mission, vision, and core values of the State Park system.14 I object to the use of state parks for navy training. It is the antithesis of the purpose of state parks to allow them to be used for military practice exercises on unaware Washingtonians. Please do not permit this militarization of our great state resource.15 I am writing to oppose opening state parks to war games of any nature. Parks are where we take our families to enjoy peace and quiet and interact with nature. The very thought of armed military, even if the “arms” are not actual firearms, leaping out of bushes is the very antithesis of a park. Please, do not agree to the pressure from the military to war games in our parks!16 The state parks are places for recreation, relaxation and tranquility and should be safe and secure. Seeing Military Service Members in battle dress with rubber replicas of assault rifles and other military equipment hiding in the bushes, stalking and observing park visitors IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AND IS DEEPLY DISTURBING. Particularly so for those park visitors with young children. It beggers belief that anyone in a position to allow this situation to occur is even considering it and that we the people have to stand up and object to this in any formal way. The very idea that this could occur in parks that the citizens of Washington State own and are taxed to maintain is unconscionable. THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO OCCUR.17 Navy RPA Comments- through 12/18/2020 I object to the Navy’s proposal to use our State Parks for training. There are serious problems with the proposal. Allowing the Navy to use our State Parks for training would further militarize our society, taking over a large number of parks (29) for military training. One of the key responsibilities for civil authorities is to tell the military when enough is enough. Just say NO to using public parks for military training.18 I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposal by the US Navy that they use our State Parks for training purposes. The Navy has no shortage of places to train, while the civilian population relies on our parks to provide safe and peaceful recreation, especially in this time of a raging pandemic. I am horrified that it is even under consideration. I understand that the privacy of park users could be compromised by these exercises and strongly object to that possibility. To quote from the assistant director of State Parks, the mission is “to care for state resources and provide recreational access to the public.” This proposal does not meet that standard and needs to be rejected.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tstable of Content
    ZZ LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2017 North Atlantic Treaty Organization London International Model United Nations 18th Session | 2017 tsTable of Content 1 ZZ LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents WELCOME TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION .............................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION TO THE COMMITTEE .................................................................................................................. 4 TOPIC A: FORMING A NATO STRATEGY IN CYBERSPACE ............................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Timeline of notable attacks ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1998 – 2001 “MOONLIGHT MAZE” ....................................................................................................................... 7 2005 – 2011 TITAN RAIN & BYZANTINE HADES .................................................................................................. 8 2007 Estonia DDoS Campaigns ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Navy Diver
    U.S. Navy Diver Requirements, Training and Rate Information for Navy Diver (ND) Updated: May 2016 Job Description: Navy Diver’s (ND) conduct and supervise diving operations using all types of underwater breathing apparatus which include open circuit SCUBA, closed and semi­closed mixed gas underwater breathing apparatus, surface supplied air and mixed gas diving systems and equipment and saturation diving systems. Their duties include use of explosive demolitions, small arms proficiency and (command specific) parachute operations. The NAVY DIVER (ND) rating performs multiple missions depending on the command a member is assigned. Salvage Operations: Navy Divers perform open ocean, harbor and combat/expeditionary ​ salvage operations. These operations are conducted in water up to 300 feet deep and range from salvaging entire ships and aircraft to recovering debris spread over miles of ocean floor using state of the art mixed­gas diving systems, high­tech ROV equipment and explosives for clearing channels and waterways. Battle Damage and Ship Repair Operations: Highly ​ complex underwater repairs to surface ships and submarines is a mainstay of the Navy Diver. Ships damaged in battle or requiring maintenance must be fixed to keep the fleet operational. From placing cofferdams for flood prevention during repairs to replacing 80 ton ship propellers, if it's under the waterline, Navy Divers are called to complete the job. Battle Damage and Ship repair operations require the use of state of the art diving equipment, underwater cutting and welding, Non­Destructive testing, digital video equipment, complex rigging operations, hydraulic tool systems and precision demolition materials. Special Warfare Supporting Operations: A growing area of the ​ Navy Diving field is supporting the underwater operations of the SO and EOD communities.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document FSC.DEL/31/21 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 29 January 2021 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only STATEMENT on the Joint Turkish-Azerbaijani Large-Scale Military Exercise as delivered by the Delegation of the Republic of Armenia at the 966th Plenary Meeting of the Forum for Security Co-operation 27 January 2021 Madam Chairperson, On 17 January the Ministry of Defense of Turkey announced through its official website about conducting the «Winter-2021» joint Turkish-Azerbaijani military exercise in Kars from 1 to 12 February. This was followed by information disseminated by the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan on the departure of the military personnel and equipment of the Nakhijevan Combined Army of Azerbaijan to Turkey to take part in the joint military exercise. According to the Turkish media reports, the planned exercise is expected to be one of the largest winter military drills of recent times aimed, among others, at improving cooperation and coordination during joint military operations and testing combat capabilities under extreme weather conditions. Reportedly, the military exercise will involve tank divisions, heavy artillery, sniper teams, helicopters and special forces. At the previous meeting of the FSC we drew the attention of the participating States to this exercise. In response to our inquiry Turkish delegation here in Vienna insisted that the exercise was not notified under the Vienna Document because of the small number of the military personnel and equipment to be engaged in it.
    [Show full text]
  • And Financial Implications of Unmanned
    Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources MASSACHUsf TTT IMef0hrE OF TECHNOLOGY by Richard Winston Larson MAY 0 8 201 S.B. Engineering LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2014 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. 2) Author Dep.atment of Mechanical Engineering nuaryL5.,3014 Certified by.... Y Douglas P. Hart Professor of Mechanical Engineering Tbesis Supervisor A ccepted by ....................... ........ David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources by Richard Winston Larson Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on January 15, 2014, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract The naval warfare environment is rapidly changing. The U.S. Navy is adapting by continuing its blue-water dominance while simultaneously building brown-water ca- pabilities. Unmanned systems, such as unmanned airborne drones, are proving piv- otal in facing new battlefield challenges. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) are emerging as the Navy's seaborne equivalent of the Air Force's drones. Representing a low-end disruptive technology relative to traditional shipborne operations, UUVs are becoming capable of taking on increasingly complex roles, tipping the scales of battlefield entropy. They improve mission outcomes and operate for a fraction of the cost of traditional operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Data
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Houston, Texas 77058 Space Administration January 2016 CHRISTOPHER J. CASSIDY (CAPTAIN, U.S. NAVY) NASA ASTRONAUT Video Q&A with Christopher PERSONAL DATA: Born in 1970 in Salem, Massachusetts. Considers York, Maine, to be his hometown. EDUCATION: Graduated from York High School, York, Maine; completed Naval Academy Prep School, Newport, Rhode Island, 1989; received a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, U.S. Naval Academy, 1993; received a Master of Science in Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000, Honorary PHD from Hussein University, 2015. ORGANIZATIONS: U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alumni Association; Fraternal Order of Underwater Demoliton Team (UDT)/Sea, Air, Land Team (SEAL) Association. Click photo for downloadable high-res version SPECIAL HONORS: Honor graduate of Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) Class 192; awarded the Bronze Star with combat ‘V’ and Presidential Unit Citation for leading a nine-day operation at the Zharwar Kili cave complex on the Afghanistan/Pakistan border; guest speaker at the U.S. Naval Academy Combat Leadership Seminar, 2003 & 2004; awarded a second Bronze Star for combat leadership service in Afghanistan, 2004; Recipient of NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal. Finisher in the Ironman World Championship triathlon in Kona, Hawaii, 2014. MILITARY EXPERIENCE: Ten years as a member of the U.S. Navy SEALs Team. He made four six-month deployments: two to Afghanistan, and two to the Mediterranean. Cassidy served as Executive Officer and Operations Officer of Special Boat Team Twenty in Norfolk, Virginia, and SEAL platoon commander at SEAL Team THREE in Coronado, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Training to Fight – Russia's Major Military Exercises 2011–2014
    “Train hard, fi ght easy.” The Russian 18th century General Aleksandr Norberg Johan toFight Training Vasilievich Suvorov (see cover) is said to never have lost a battle. The main idea of his dictum is clear. Armed forces train to fi ght. The more they train, the better they get. Exercises are primarily a way to develop capabilities in units, build the fi ghting power of a force and, ultimately, the military power of the state. How did military exercises contribute to the fi ghting power of Russia’s Armed Forces in 2011 – 2014? Based on reporting in Russian open sources, the main conclusion in this report is that the Russian Armed Forces exercises enabled them to train how to launch and fi ght large-scale joint inter-service operations, i.e. launching and waging inter-state wars Training to Fight – Russia’s Major Military Exercises 2011–2014 Johan Norberg FOI-R--4128--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se December 2015 Johan Norberg Training to Fight – Russia’s Major Military Exercises 2011–2014 Press Bild/Cover: TT/The Art Collector/Heritage. Alexander Suvorov, Russian general, (1833). In a military career lasting almost 60 years, Suvorov (1729-1800) never lost a battle. In 1799-1800, during the War of the Second Coalition against France, he led a Russian army on an epic retreat across the Alps reminiscent of Hannibal. Found in the collection of The Hermitage, St Petersburg. FOI-R--4128--SE Titel Training to Fight Title Training to Fight Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--4128--SE Månad/Month December Utgivningsår/Year 2015 Antal sidor/Pages 100 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet / Swedish Ministry of Defence Forskningsområde 8.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chelonia Mydas) in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL Assessing temporal and spatial patterns in habitat use of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Ana Rita Marcelino Teresa Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação orientada por: Professor Doutor Tiago A. Marques Doutor Sean F. Hanser 2021 Acknowledgments Personally, I wish to thank everyone whose assistance was essential to the development of this thesis. I am extremely thankful to my professor and supervisor Tiago Marques, who started by proposing this Hawaiian marine turtle data, which would one day become my thesis. I want to thank you for all the encouragement, permanent support and scientific guidance you have provided during this time as your student. Your enthusiasm and constant motivation words were precious, thank you! I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Sean Hanser, for all the support given during this path. Thank you very much for your wonderful advices and guidance, which helped me through all of this thesis. I would like to express a special appreciation to Andrew DiMatteo, Marta Rufino and Soraia Pereira, for advices provided that enriched this work. I also want to thank all the professors that inspired me during my academic life. A realização deste trabalho não teria sido possível sem a motivação das pessoas que me são mais queridas. Como tal, quero agradecer à minha família e aos meus amigos. À minha família e, em especial, à minha mãe e avós, por todo o incentivo e carinho durante este percurso. Sempre me ouviram, se preocuparam e mostraram interesse pelo meu trabalho.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-SOF Training Part 4: “Water”
    ISSUE SIXTY-SEVEN March 2008 Pre-SOF Training Part 4: “Water” Phase Robert Ord page 1 Nutrition The Teeter-Totter Nicole Carroll page 8 Technique Part 2: Q&A Greg Glassman page 9 Good Coach, Bad Coach Mark Eaton page 10 Mobility in Design A Portable Pull-Up Structure Doug Chapman page 11 Good Hormones, Bad Hormones The Energy Balance Equation Tony Leyland page 13 Getting Started in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Becca Borawski page 16 Scaling Down CrossFit Workouts with Rings Tyler Hass page 19 Pre-SOF Training Pat’s Oly Workout: Snatch page 22 Part 4: “Water” Phase Mike Burgener Robert Ord On the Safety and In the first block of our pre-SOF (Special Operations Forces) training program, Efficacy of Overhead known as Selection, trainees were introduced to the rigors of CrossFit combined Lifting with SOF-style training. During the “Indoc” phase, the slow and gradual ramping Greg Glassman, Mark Rippetoe, up of intensity allowed for bodies and minds to safely become accustomed to Lon Kilgore, Kelly Starrett, Daniel physical work efforts with short bursts of extreme workloads. In the second phase, Crumback, Paul Benfanti page 23 “Assessment,” the intensity was ratcheted up significantly and minimum standards were put in place to ensure that the trainees who were allowed to continue on in Media Tips, #1 Tony Budding training were strong enough to move into the more SOF-skills-oriented training of page 30 our second block, which we call Preparation. Speal on Wrestling continued page ... 2 Chris Spealler page 31 CrossFit Journal • Issue Sixty-Seven • March
    [Show full text]
  • United States Tactical Nuclear Doctrine: Developing a Capability
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1979 United States tactical nuclear doctrine: Developing a capability Christopher Michael Cooke College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Military and Veterans Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cooke, Christopher Michael, "United States tactical nuclear doctrine: Developing a capability" (1979). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625067. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-zset-zj41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Tactical Nuclear ii Doctrines Developing A Capability A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Government The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillmait Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Christopher Cooke 1979 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Christopher Cooke Approved, August 1979 ar Magaret Hamilton ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to Professor Alan J. Ward, under whose guidance this study was conducted, for his very helpful advice and, especially, for his considerable editorial skill. The author is also indebted to Professors Margaret Hamilton and George Grayson for their careful reading and criticism of the manuscript. LIST OF TABLES Figure Page A.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, Volume 2, Chapter
    Military Diving Operations and Medical Support Chapter 31 MILITARY DIVING OPERATIONS AND MEDICAL SUPPORT † RICHARD D. VANN, PHD*; AND JAMES VOROSMARTI, JR, MD INTRODUCTION BREATH-HOLD DIVING CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OXYGEN TOXICITY IN COMBAT DIVERS UNDERWATER BREATHING APPARATUS Open-Circuit Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus: The Aqualung Surface-Supplied Diving Closed-Circuit Oxygen Scuba Semiclosed Mixed-Gas Scuba Closed-Circuit, Mixed-Gas Scuba THE ROLE OF RESPIRATION IN DIVING INJURIES Carbon Dioxide Retention and Dyspnea Interactions Between Gases and Impaired Consciousness Individual Susceptibility to Impaired Consciousness DECOMPRESSION PROCEDURES No-Stop (No-Decompression) Dives In-Water Decompression Stops Surface Decompression Repetitive and Multilevel Diving Dive Computers Nitrogen–Oxygen Diving Helium–Oxygen and Trimix Diving Omitted Decompression Flying After Diving and Diving at Altitude The Safety of Decompression Practice SATURATION DIVING Atmospheric Control Infection Hyperbaric Arthralgia Depth Limits Decompression THERMAL PROTECTION AND BUOYANCY TREATMENT OF DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS AND ARTERIAL GAS EMBOLISM Therapy According to US Navy Treatment Tables Decompression Sickness in Saturation Diving MEDICAL STANDARDS FOR DIVING SUBMARINE RESCUE AND ESCAPE SUMMARY *Captain, US Navy Reserve (Ret); Divers Alert Network, Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology, Box 3823, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 †Captain, Medical Corps, US Navy (Ret); Consultant in Occupational, Environmental, and Undersea Medicine, 16 Orchard Way South, Rockville, Maryland 20854 955 Military Preventive Medicine: Mobilization and Deployment INTRODUCTION Divers breathe gases and experience pressure land) teams and two SEAL delivery vehicle (SDV) changes that can cause different injuries from those teams. SEALs are trained for reconnaissance and encountered by most combatant or noncombatant direct action missions at rivers, harbors, shipping, military personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear-Conventional-Firebreaks
    NUCLEAR-CONVENTIONAL FIREBREAKS AND THE NUCLEAR TABOO BARRY D. WATTS NUCLEAR-COnVEnTIOnAL FIREBREAKS AnD THE NUCLEAR TABOO BY BARRy D. WATTS 2013 Acknowledgments The idea of exploring systematically why the leaders of various nations have chosen to maintain, or aspire to acquire, nuclear weapons was first suggested to me by Andrew W. Marshall. In several cases, the motivations attributed to national leaders in this report are undoubtedly speculative and open to debate. Nevertheless, it is a fact that the rulers of at least some nations entertain strong reasons for maintaining or acquiring nuclear weapons that have nothing to do with the nuclear competition between the United States and the former Soviet Union, either before or after 1991. Eric Edelman provided valuable suggestions on both substance and sources. At the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, Abby Stewart and Nick Setterberg did the majority of the editing. I am especially grateful to Nick for vetting the footnotes. Last but not least, Andrew Krepinevich’s suggestions on the narrative flow and the structure of the paper’s arguments greatly clarified the original draft. © 2013 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. COnTEnTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 5 THE AMERICAN SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVES TO GENERAL NUCLEAR WAR 5 Context 7 Atomic Blackmail and Massive Nuclear Retaliation 11 Flexible Response and Assured Destruction 15 The Long Range Research and Development Planning Program 19 Selective Nuclear Options and Presidential Directive/NSC-59 23 The Strategic Defense Initiative 26 The Soviet General Staff, LNOs and Launch on Warning 29 POST-COLD WAR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA 29 Evolving U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice Admiral Joseph Maguire Usn (Ret.) to Be Director, National Counterterrorism Center; and Ellen E
    S. HRG. 115–580 OPEN HEARING: NOMINATIONS OF: VICE ADMIRAL JOSEPH MAGUIRE USN (RET.) TO BE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER; AND ELLEN E. MCCARTHY TO BE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH, DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 2018 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–958 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 11:48 Apr 23, 2019 Jkt 032694 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\30958.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHUCK SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 11:48 Apr 23, 2019 Jkt 032694 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\30958.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS JULY 25, 2018 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon. Richard, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from North Carolina ...............
    [Show full text]