DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Title WESTERN HUB RAIL LINK LEVEL 2 FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY Fortescue Metals Group Ltd COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: Western Hub Rail Link Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey Our Reference: 9049-3017-13R final rev 0 flora Copyright © 1987-2014 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this document may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Direct all inquiries to: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd 9 Stirling Highway • PO Box 50 NORTH FREMANTLE WA 6159 Ph: (08) 9430 8955 Fax: (08) 9430 8977 Rev. Author Approved Date Draft rev 0 SK, LA BT August 2013 Final rev 0 SK, LA BT October 2014 9049-3017-13R FINAL REV 0 FLORA 29/10/2014 II TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................1 Acronyms and Abbreviations .....................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................3 1.0 . Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................4 1.1 ... Project Overview .................................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 .... Survey Area Location .......................................................................................................................4 1.2 ... Project Objectives ...............................................................................................................................6 1.2.1 .... Relevant Legislation .........................................................................................................................6 1.3 ... Previous Botanical Surveys .................................................................................................................6 2.0 . Existing Environment ...........................................................................................................................8 2.1 ... Physical Environment ..........................................................................................................................8 2.1.1 .... Climate .............................................................................................................................................8 2.1.2 .... Geology ............................................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 .... Land Systems ...................................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 .... Drainage .........................................................................................................................................10 2.2 ... Biological Environment ......................................................................................................................10 2.2.1 .... Biogeographic Region ....................................................................................................................10 2.2.2 .... Flora ...............................................................................................................................................10 2.2.3 .... Vegetation and Ecological Communities ........................................................................................12 3.0 . Methods ...............................................................................................................................................17 3.1 ... Flora and Vegetation Assessment ....................................................................................................17 3.1.1 .... Field Survey ...................................................................................................................................17 3.2 ... Flora and Vegetation Significance.....................................................................................................20 3.2.1 .... Survey Area Floristic Analysis ........................................................................................................20 3.2.2 .... Local and Regional Vegetation Significance ..................................................................................21 3.3 ... Adequacy of Sampling ......................................................................................................................22 4.0 . Results .................................................................................................................................................23 4.1 ... Flora Survey ......................................................................................................................................23 4.1.1 .... Flora Inventory ...............................................................................................................................23 4.1.2 .... Conservation Significant Flora .......................................................................................................24 4.1.3 .... Undescribed (New) Species ...........................................................................................................27 4.1.4 .... Introduced Flora .............................................................................................................................27 4.2 ... Vegetation Assessment .....................................................................................................................34 4.2.1 .... Vegetation Types ...........................................................................................................................34 4.2.2 .... Conservation Significance of Vegetation Types ............................................................................55 4.2.3 .... Vegetation Condition ......................................................................................................................56 4.3 ... Survey Area Floristic Analysis ...........................................................................................................57 4.4 ... Adequacy of Sampling ......................................................................................................................57 4.5 ... Survey Timing and Botanical Limitations ..........................................................................................59 4.5.1 .... Field Survey Timing ........................................................................................................................59 9049-3017-13R FINAL REV 0 FLORA 29/10/2014 III 5.0 . Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................62 5.1 ... Flora Significance ..............................................................................................................................62 5.1.1 .... Conservation Significant Flora .......................................................................................................62 5.1.2 .... Introduced Species .........................................................................................................................63 5.2 ... Vegetation Significance .....................................................................................................................64 5.2.1 .... Vegetation Types ...........................................................................................................................64 5.2.2 .... Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ..........................................................................64 5.2.3 .... Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems ...........................................................................................64 5.2.4 .... Sheet Flow Dependent Ecosystems ..............................................................................................64 5.2.5 .... Regional Vegetation Significance ..................................................................................................64 5.3 ... Vegetation Condition .........................................................................................................................65 5.4 ... Summary Conclusion ........................................................................................................................66 References .................................................................................................................................................67 Maps ............................................................................................................................................................73 Appendix One: Definitions and Criteria ..................................................................................................82 Appendix Two: DPaW Database Search Results ...................................................................................90 Appendix Three: EPBC Act Protected Matters Report ..........................................................................94 Appendix Four: NatureMap Search Results
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve
    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve This project was supported by NACC NRM and the Shire of Morawa through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program Canna Reserve BioBlitz 2019 Weaving and wonder in the wilderness! The weather may have been hot and dry, but that didn’t stop everyone having fun and learning about the rich biodiversity and conservation value of the wonderful Canna Reserve during the highly successful 2019 BioBlitz. On the 14 - 15 September 2019, NACC NRM together with support from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions and the Shire of Morawa, hosted their third BioBlitz at the Canna Reserve in the Shire of Morawa. Fifty professional biologists and citizen scientists attended the event with people travelling from near and far including Morawa, Perenjori, Geraldton and Perth. After an introduction and Acknowledgement of Country from organisers Jessica Stingemore and Jarna Kendle, the BioBlitz kicked off with participants separating into four teams and heading out to explore Canna Reserve with the goal of identifying as many plants, birds, invertebrates, and vertebrates as possible in a 24 hr period. David Knowles of Spineless Wonders led the invertebrate survey with assistance from, OAM recipient Allen Sundholm, Jenny Borger of Jenny Borger Botanical Consultancy led the plant team, BirdLife Midwest member Alice Bishop guided the bird survey team and David Pongracz from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ran the vertebrate surveys with assistance from volunteer Corin Desmond. The BioBlitz got off to a great start identifying 80 plant species during the first survey with many more species to come and even a new orchid find for the reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Androcalva Bivillosa
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this conservation advice and included this species in the Critically Endangered category, effective from 11/05/2018. Conservation Advice Androcalva bivillosa Summary of assessment Conservation status Androcalva bivillosa has been found to be eligible for listing in the Critically Endangered category as outlined in the attached assessment. Reason for conservation assessment by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee This advice follows assessment of information provided by Western Australia as part of the Common Assessment Method process, to systematically review species that are inconsistently listed under the EPBC Act and relevant state/territory legislation or lists. More information on the Common Assessment Method is available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/cam The information in this assessment has been compiled by the relevant state/territory government. In adopting this assessment under the EPBC Act, this document forms the Approved Conservation Advice for this species as required under s266B of the EPBC Act. Public consultation Notice of the proposed amendment and a consultation document was made available for public comment for 32 business days between 16 August 2017 and 29 September 2017. Any comments received that were relevant to the survival of the species were considered by the Committee as part of the assessment process. Recovery plan A recovery plan for this species under the EPBC Act is not recommended, because the Approved Conservation Advice provides sufficient direction to implement priority actions and mitigate against key threats. The relevant state/territory may decide to develop a plan under its equivalent legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Ore Deposits of the Pilbara Region 2007 Kangeenarina Creek (1:500 000 Scale): Western Australia Geological Survey
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA 116°00À 116°30À 117°00À 117°30À 118°00À 115°25À 115°30À 118°30À 119°00À 20°06À 119°30À 120°00À 120°30À 120°55À 20°06À IRON ORE GEOLOGY I N D I A N O C E A N Zones of supergene enrichment Bobby Bobby Ridley 1-4 Channel iron deposits and pisolite (Robe Pisolite and Poondano Formation) Olivia PORT HEDLAND Finucane Island NORTH Brockman Iron Formation (Note: also includes some Weeli Wolli Formation) Ord 1-5 WEST COASTAL HIGHWAY Harriet Point (proposed) Nelson Point F13 North Anderson Point GOLDSWORTHY Marra Mamba Iron Formation MONTEBELLO Wedgefield South Limb ISLANDS LEGENDRE I Mt Goldsworthy Boodarie HBI (closed) Lena SHAY GAP Townsites ROAD Banded iron-formation in graniteÊgreenstone terrane South Nim A HAUY I Hedland Nimingarra B Population more than 10 000 PORT HEDLAND GIDLEY I Nimingarra E ROSEMARY I 1000Ê10000 DAMPIER Poondano West Poondano East - Table Hill Sunrise Hill West Poondano Central Nim 1 less than 1000 Roebourne ANGEL I I S L A N D S 20°30À COONGAN MALUS I Sunrise Hill Shay Gap IRON ORE MINERALIZATION STYLES Salgash Ronsard Island (proposed) RONSARD I Locality Hematite Hill 20°30À Conservation estate boundary WEST LEWIS I Cattle Gorge Pisolitic and limonitic riverine palaeochannel mineralization or channel iron deposits (CID) BURRUP GOLDSWORTHY Cundaline Highway PENINSULA Cape Lambert F O R E S T I E R of the Cenozoic Robe Pisolite and Poondano Formation. ENDERBY I EAST LEWIS I Yarrie 10 DIXON I DEPUCH I ROAD Yarrie 4 Mineralization style is 'Regolith _ alluvial to beach placer mineralization' Road; sealed Point Samson Yarrie Yarrie 8 LOWENDAL Parker Point MARBLE ISLANDS Road; unsealed EAGLEHAWK I East Intercourse Island DAMPIER Hematitic conglomerate of the Neoproterozoic Eel Creek Formation (Tarcunyah Group, ROAD Callawa WEST INTERCOURSE I WICKHAM Cossack A BAR Officer Basin), which formed in a near-shore environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan
    Report Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan Long Term Mine Planning 7 June 2018 R-PL-EN-0041 Rev 0 CLOSURE GUIDELINE CHECKLIST Report This closure plan addresses the progressive rehabilitation and closure of rail infrastructure projects associated with the Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004. In the absence of regulatory guidelines for inland infrastructure projects, this closure plan follows the report structure described within the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans May 2015 published by the Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum (now the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) and Environmental Protection Authority. The closure of mining operations, including quarries, is not within the scope of this closure plan. Closure Plan (CP) checklist Y/N Page Comments 1 Has the Checklist been endorsed by a senior Y 2 Report has been endorsed using representative within the tenement holder/operating standard Fortescue processes. company? Public Availability 2 Are you aware that from 2015 all CPs will be made N/A This report is not subject to mine closure publicly available? conditions under the Mining Act. 3 Is there any information in the CP that should not be N publicly available? 4 If “Yes” to Q3, has confidential information been N/A submitted in a separate document/section? Cover Page, Table of Contents 5 Does the CP cover page include: Y 1 This report is provided for information • Project Title only. • Company Name • Contact Details (including telephone numbers and email addresses) • Document ID and version number • Date of submission (needs to match the date of this checklist) Scope and Purpose 6 State why the CP is submitted Y 11 This plan has been provided to support the Eliwana Rail Project Public Environmental Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing the Pilbara Department of a Prefeasibility Assessment of the Potential Primary Industries and Regional Development for Irrigated Agriculture Development
    Growing the Pilbara Department of A prefeasibility assessment of the potential Primary Industries and Regional Development for irrigated agriculture development Growing the Pilbara — A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development 1 November 2017 Disclaimer The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2017 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth WA 6151 Tel: (08) 9368 3333 Email: [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au COVER (MAIN): Photo courtesy: Nathon Dyer RIGHT: Photo courtesy: Nathon Dyer Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Growing the Pilbara A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development A Pilbara Hinterland Agricultural Development Initiative Growing the Pilbara — A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development 3 Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................... 6 Water resources ........................................................... 25 Executive summary ...................................................... 8 Groundwater ............................................................... 25 Introduction ................................................................... 10 Targeted aquifers .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment)
    Appendix F Specified Protected Matters impact profiles (including risk assessment) Roads and Maritime Services EPBC Act Strategic Assessment – Strategic Assessment Report 1. FA1 - Wetland-dependent fauna Species included (common name, scientific name) Listing SPRAT ID Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Endangered 1001 Oxleyan Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca oxleyana) Endangered 64468 Blue Mountains Water Skink (Eulamprus leuraensis) Endangered 59199 Yellow-spotted Tree Frog/Yellow-spotted Bell Frog (Litoria castanea) Endangered 1848 Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australicus) Vulnerable 1973 Booroolong Frog (Litoria booroolongensis) Endangered 1844 Littlejohns Tree Frog (Litoria littlejohni) Vulnerable 64733 1.1 Wetland-dependent fauna description Item Summary Description Found in the waters, riparian vegetation and associated wetland vegetation of a diversity of freshwater wetland habitats. B. poiciloptilus is a large, stocky, thick-necked heron-like bird with camouflage-like plumage growing up to 66-76 cm with a wingspan of 1050-1180 cm and feeds on freshwater crustacean, fish, insects, snakes, leaves and fruit. N. oxleyana is light brown to olive coloured freshwater fish with mottling and three to four patchy, dark brown bars extending from head to tail and a whitish belly growing up to 35-60 mm. This is a mobile species that is often observed individually or in pairs and sometimes in small groups but does not form schools and feed on aquatic insects and their larvae (Allen, 1989; McDowall, 1996). E. leuraensis is an insectivorous, medium-sized lizard growing to approximately 20 cm in length. This species has a relatively dark brown/black body when compared to other Eulamprus spp. Also has narrow yellow/bronze to white stripes along its length to beginning of the tail and continuing along the tail as a series of spots (LeBreton, 1996; Cogger, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Conservation Translocation Perspectives: 2021. Case Studies from Around the Globe
    Global conservation Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 translocation perspectives: 2021 IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 Case studies from around the globe Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group (CTSG) i The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. IUCN is pleased to acknowledge the support of its Framework Partners who provide core funding: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark; Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland; Government of France and the French Development Agency (AFD); the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea; the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the United States Department of State. Published by: IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi & Calgary Zoo, Canada. Copyright: © 2021 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Soorae, P. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking West: a Guide to Aboriginal Records in Western Australia
    A Guide to Aboriginal Records in Western Australia The Records Taskforce of Western Australia ¨ ARTIST Jeanette Garlett Jeanette is a Nyungar Aboriginal woman. She was removed from her family at a young age and was in Mogumber Mission from 1956 to 1968, where she attended the Mogumber Mission School and Moora Junior High School. Jeanette later moved to Queensland and gained an Associate Diploma of Arts from the Townsville College of TAFE, majoring in screen printing batik. From 1991 to present day, Jeanette has had 10 major exhibitions and has been awarded four commissions Australia-wide. Jeanette was the recipient of the Dick Pascoe Memorial Shield. Bill Hayden was presented with one of her paintings on a Vice Regal tour of Queensland. In 1993 several of her paintings were sent to Iwaki in Japan (sister city of Townsville in Japan). A recent major commission was to create a mural for the City of Armadale (working with Elders and students from the community) to depict the life of Aboriginal Elders from 1950 to 1980. Jeanette is currently commissioned by the Mundaring Arts Centre to work with students from local schools to design and paint bus shelters — the established theme is the four seasons. Through her art, Jeanette assists Aboriginal women involved in domestic and traumatic situations, to express their feelings in order to commence their journey of healing. Jeanette currently lives in Northam with her family and is actively working as an artist and art therapist in that region. Jeanette also lectures at the O’Connor College of TAFE. Her dream is to have her work acknowledged and respected by her peers and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Duke Herbarium Annual Report DUKE HERBARIUM: ALGAE & FUNGI
    www.herbarium.duke.edu 2012 Annual Report Algae and Fungi Bryophytes Lichens Vascular Plants Herbarium Activity Statistics Page 2 Pages 3-4 Page 5 Pages 6-7 Page 8 DUKE HERBARIUM: 2012 NEWS Herbarium Data Manager, Blanka Shaw, oversaw the conversion and upgrade of CRYPTOGAMIC HERBARIUM both the bryophyte and lichen databases DATABASING PROGRESS into Specify6 collection management software in 2012. Blanka acts as the primary liaison to the Trinity Office of Technology Services, which provides server Records (cumulative) in in-house FUNGAL HERBARIUM management and IT support. Blaine Ott Specify databases Year NEWS FLASH! ! (TOTS) facilitated migration of the In 2012, our fungal collections curator, cryptogamic herbarium databases to a new Bryophytes Lichens Algae Rytas Vilgalys, secured NSF funds for the server in 2012. digitization and image organization of 2005 57,561 5,757 0 the fungal herbarium. This digitization 2006 99,332 7,750 0 project is called The Macrofungi Co!ection 2007 127,503 10,199 1 Consortium: Unlocking a Biodiversity Resource for Understanding Biotic 2008 139,612 12,743 31 Interactions, Nutrient Cycling and Human 2009 154,334 14,251 2,909 A#airs. This NSF grant no. 1206197 2010 157,108 21,216 >9000 (2012-2015) is led by Barbara Thiers at New York Botanical Garden. Funds will 2011 162,988 26,299 14,988 be available for our collection in 2013. 2012 167,573 36,631 >18,000 Herbarium Data Manager (B. Shaw) is overseeing the import of existing Duke fungal specimens into the MyCoPortal (http://mycoportal.org/portal/index.php) 2012 Duke Herbarium Annual Report DUKE HERBARIUM: ALGAE & FUNGI A LGAL N E W S 2012 PEER- REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS CITING D UKE ALGAL HERBARIUM The Duke Algal Herbarium participated in a 2012 Collaborative Proposal to NSF: Advancing None recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto Iron Ore
    Rio Tinto Iron Ore Brockman Syncline 4 – Revised Proposal Assessment on Proponent Information Environmental Review Document Hamersley Iron Pty Limited 152 – 158 St Georges Terrace, Perth GPO Box A42, Perth, WA 6837 July 2014 RTIO-HSE-0209902 Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared by Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Rio Tinto), on behalf of Hamersley Iron Pty Limited (Hamersley Iron), specifically for the Brockman Syncline 4 Iron Ore Project. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to without the express approval of Rio Tinto, unless the report has been released for referral and assessment of proposals. Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer/s Date To Whom Date A ‐ D M. Palandri T. Souster/P. Royce 02/12/13 E ‐ F T. Souster Project Team 08/01/14 1 T. Souster OEPA 04/02/2014 2 T. Souster OEPA 21/02/2014 T. Souster/A. OEPA 11/07/2014 3‐4 T. Souster/P. Royce 11/07/14 Featherstone July 2014 ii Brockman Syncline 4 – Revised Proposal API Environmental Review RTIO‐HSE‐0209902 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROPONENT DETAILS ................................................................................................................1 1.2 THE BROCKMAN SYNCLINE 4 PROJECT .....................................................................................1 2 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION................................................................................................... 6 2.1 PROVISION
    [Show full text]
  • Rutila Resources Railway Corridor Flora and Vegetation Assessment
    RUTILA RESOURCES RAI LWAY CORRIDOR FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT Preston Consulting COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: Rutila Resources Railway Corridor Flora and Vegetation Assessment Our Reference: 9633-3228-14R final Copyright © 1987-2014 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this document may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Direct all inquiries to: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd 9 Stirling Highway • PO Box 50 NORTH FREMANTLE WA 6159 Ph: (08) 9430 8955 Fax: (08) 9430 8977 Rev. Author Approved Date Draft rev 0 LA JN/BT 06/06/2014 Final LA BT 10/06/2014 9633- 3 2 2 8 - 1 4 R F I N A L 1 0 / 0 6 / 2 0 1 4 II TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 . Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 .... Project Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Nuytsia the Journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 23: 503–526 Published Online 21 November 2013
    L.J. Biggs & C.M. Parker, Updates to WA’s vascular plant census for 2012 503 Nuytsia The journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 23: 503–526 Published online 21 November 2013 SHORT COMMUNICATION Updates to Western Australia’s vascular plant census for 2012 The census database at the Western Australian Herbarium (PERTH) lists current names and recent synonymy for Western Australia’s native and naturalised vascular plants, as well as algae, bryophytes, lichens, slime moulds and some fungi. The names represented in the census are either sourced from published research or denote as yet unpublished names based on herbarium voucher specimens. We herein summarise the changes made to vascular plant records in this database during 2012. Ninety five taxa were newly recorded for the state, of which 11 are naturalised and 29 have been added to the Department of Parks and Wildlife’s (DPaW; formerly Department of Environment and Conservation) Threatened and Priority Flora list for Western Australia (Smith 2012) (Table 1). Three hundred and twenty six existing entries on the census underwent a name change (Table 2), including a number of taxa in Eucalyptus L’Her (Nicolle & French 2012; Nicolle et al. 2012), Polygala L. (Kerrigan 2012), and Commersonia J.R.Forst & G.Forst and Rulingia R.Br. (Wilkins & Whitlock 2011a, 2011b). Under the Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (CHAH) guidelines for informal names (Barker 2005), manuscript names are being converted to phrase names unless publication is imminent. Sixty three manuscript names were updated to phrase names through this process, while 26 manuscript names and 49 phrase names were formally published (Table 2).
    [Show full text]