DOCSLIB.ORG

Rutila Resources Railway Corridor Flora and Vegetation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rutila Resources Railway Corridor Flora and Vegetation Assessment RUTILA RESOURCES RAI LWAY CORRIDOR FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT Preston Consulting COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: Rutila Resources Railway Corridor Flora and Vegetation Assessment Our Reference: 9633-3228-14R final Copyright © 1987-2014 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this document may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Direct all inquiries to: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd 9 Stirling Highway • PO Box 50 NORTH FREMANTLE WA 6159 Ph: (08) 9430 8955 Fax: (08) 9430 8977 Rev. Author Approved Date Draft rev 0 LA JN/BT 06/06/2014 Final LA BT 10/06/2014 9633- 3 2 2 8 - 1 4 R F I N A L 1 0 / 0 6 / 2 0 1 4 II TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 . Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 .... Project Overview ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 ....Study Area Location ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 .... Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 .... Legislation and Policies ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 .... Permits ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.5 .... Previous Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 . Physical Environment .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 ....Climate ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1.2 ....Geology ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.3 ....Land Systems ................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 ....Drainage ........................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 . Biological Environment ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 .... Biogeographic Region ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 .... Flora ..................................................................................................................................................10 3.2.1 ....Conservation Significant Flora .......................................................................................................10 3.2.2 ....Commonwealth Protected Matters Search ....................................................................................10 3.2.3 ....DPaW Threatened and Priority Flora Database Search ................................................................10 3.2.4 ....NatureMap Search .........................................................................................................................11 3.2.5 ....Significant Species According to Guidance Statement No. 51 ......................................................11 3.2.6 ....Ecoscape Experience .....................................................................................................................11 3.2.7 ....Introduced Species .........................................................................................................................12 3.3 .... Vegetation and Ecological Communities ...........................................................................................12 3.3.1 ....Vegetation Association Mapping ....................................................................................................12 3.3.2 ....Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ..........................................................................13 3.3.3 ....Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems ...........................................................................................15 3.3.4 ....Mulga Communities ........................................................................................................................17 3.3.5 ....Ecosystems at Risk ........................................................................................................................18 3.3.6 ....Significant Vegetation According to Guidance Statement No. 51 ..................................................18 3.3.7 ....Previous Surveys ...........................................................................................................................19 4.0 . Methods ...............................................................................................................................................22 4.1 .... Reconnaissance Survey ....................................................................................................................22 4.1.1 ....Vegetation Type Assessment and Mapping Methodology .............................................................22 4.2 .... Conservation Significant Flora Likelihood Assessment ....................................................................22 5.0 . Results .................................................................................................................................................24 5.1 .... Reconnaissance Survey ....................................................................................................................24 5.1.1 ....Access ............................................................................................................................................24 5.1.2 ....Vegetation Types ...........................................................................................................................24 9633- 3 2 2 8 - 1 4 R F I N A L 1 0 / 0 6 / 2 0 1 4 III TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.1.3 ....TECs and PECs .............................................................................................................................24 5.2 .... Conservation Significant Flora Likelihood .........................................................................................27 5.3 .... Level 2 Field Survey Timing ..............................................................................................................29 References .................................................................................................................................................30 Maps ............................................................................................................................................................36 Appendix One: Definitions and Criteria ..................................................................................................41 Appendix Two: Desktop Assessment Results .......................................................................................46 Appendix Three: Database Search Results ............................................................................................50 Appendix Four: Conservation Significant Flora Likelihood Assessment ...........................................62 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Study area ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Monthly rainfall and daily maxima and minima for Roebourne and Wittenoom (BoM 2014b; 2014c) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: NatureMap (DEC 2007-2014) search area ..................................................................................52 T ABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Extent of land systems within the study area and regional representation (Van Vreeswyk et al. 2004) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Pre-European vegetation associations within the study area (Government of Western Australia 2013) ............................................................................................................................................................13 Table 4: Type of GDE, likelihood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2001-2002 (PDF
    2001 2002 Annual report NSW national Parks & Wildlife service Published by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220 Copyright © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002 ISSN 0158-0965 Coordinator: Christine Sultana Editor: Catherine Munro Design and layout: Harley & Jones design Printed by: Agency Printing Front cover photos (from top left): Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS); Bouddi National Park (J Winter/NPWS); Banksias, Gibraltar Range National Park Copies of this report are available from the National Parks Centre, (P Green/NPWS); Launch of Backyard Buddies program (NPWS); Pacific black duck 102 George St, The Rocks, Sydney, phone 1300 361 967; or (P Green); Beyers Cottage, Hill End Historic Site (G Ashley/NPWS). NPWS Mail Order, PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220, phone: 9585 6533. Back cover photos (from left): Python tree, Gossia bidwillii (P Green); Repatriation of Aboriginal remains, La Perouse (C Bento/Australian Museum); This report can also be downloaded from the NPWS website: Rainforest, Nightcap National Park (P Green/NPWS); Northern banjo frog (J Little). www.npws.nsw.gov.au Inside front cover: Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS). Annual report 2001-2002 NPWS mission G Robertson/NPWS NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Aboriginal heritage 46 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 47 Customers, partners and stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Hilliana X Stellaticeps
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia hilliana Maiden x Acacia stellaticeps Kodela, Tindale & D.Keith Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Family Fabaceae Distribution Scattered in north-western W.A. from the NW edge of the Pilbara region N to Anna Plains Stn, adjacent to Eighty Mile Beach. Description Spreading, multistemmed, resinous, glabrous shrub 0.3–0.4 m high and 1–2 m across, ±flat-topped or low-domed, not noticeably aromatic. Bark grey. Branchlets obscurely tuberculate, obscurely ribbed. Phyllodes solitary or occasionally 2 or 3 in clusters, mostly linear to narrowly oblong, acute with innocuous to coarsely pungent points, 15–30 (–35) mm long, (1–) 1.5–2.5 (–3) mm wide, flat, rather wide spreading, mostly straight or shallowly recurved, often finely longitudinally wrinkled when dry, dull green to sub-glaucous; longitudinal nerves 3 to numerous, very obscure; gland obscure, 0.5–2 mm above pulvinus. Inflorescences simple, erect; peduncles 10–25 (–30) mm long; spikes obloid to short cylindrical, 10–15 mm long, golden.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological and Ecological Significance of Biomineralization in Plants
    Review Physiological and ecological significance of biomineralization in plants 1,2,3 3 4 3 Honghua He , Erik J. Veneklaas , John Kuo , and Hans Lambers 1 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China 2 Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China 3 School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley (Perth), WA 6009, Australia 4 Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley (Perth), WA 6009, Australia Biomineralization is widespread in the plant kingdom. stress, regulating ion balance (e.g., sodium and potassium), The most common types of biominerals in plants are detoxifying oxalic acid, disposing of alkalinity generated by calcium oxalate crystals, calcium carbonate, and silica. nitrate assimilation in above-ground organs, protecting Functions of biominerals may depend on their shape, plants against herbivory and pathogen attack, providing size, abundance, placement, and chemical composition. tissue rigidity and mechanical support, and guiding posi- In this review we highlight advances in understanding tively gravitropic growth of the rhizoids of charophycean physiological and ecological significance of biominerali- algae [1–3,13,17,19,23,29–32]. zation in plants. We focus on the functions of biominer- alization in regulating cytoplasmic free calcium levels, detoxifying aluminum and heavy metals, light gathering and scattering to optimize photosynthesis, aiding in Glossary pollen release, germination, and tube growth, the roles Biogeochemical cycle: a circuit or pathway by which a chemical element or it plays in herbivore deterrence, biogeochemical cycling molecule moves through both biotic and abiotic compartments of an ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Ore Deposits of the Pilbara Region 2007 Kangeenarina Creek (1:500 000 Scale): Western Australia Geological Survey
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA 116°00À 116°30À 117°00À 117°30À 118°00À 115°25À 115°30À 118°30À 119°00À 20°06À 119°30À 120°00À 120°30À 120°55À 20°06À IRON ORE GEOLOGY I N D I A N O C E A N Zones of supergene enrichment Bobby Bobby Ridley 1-4 Channel iron deposits and pisolite (Robe Pisolite and Poondano Formation) Olivia PORT HEDLAND Finucane Island NORTH Brockman Iron Formation (Note: also includes some Weeli Wolli Formation) Ord 1-5 WEST COASTAL HIGHWAY Harriet Point (proposed) Nelson Point F13 North Anderson Point GOLDSWORTHY Marra Mamba Iron Formation MONTEBELLO Wedgefield South Limb ISLANDS LEGENDRE I Mt Goldsworthy Boodarie HBI (closed) Lena SHAY GAP Townsites ROAD Banded iron-formation in graniteÊgreenstone terrane South Nim A HAUY I Hedland Nimingarra B Population more than 10 000 PORT HEDLAND GIDLEY I Nimingarra E ROSEMARY I 1000Ê10000 DAMPIER Poondano West Poondano East - Table Hill Sunrise Hill West Poondano Central Nim 1 less than 1000 Roebourne ANGEL I I S L A N D S 20°30À COONGAN MALUS I Sunrise Hill Shay Gap IRON ORE MINERALIZATION STYLES Salgash Ronsard Island (proposed) RONSARD I Locality Hematite Hill 20°30À Conservation estate boundary WEST LEWIS I Cattle Gorge Pisolitic and limonitic riverine palaeochannel mineralization or channel iron deposits (CID) BURRUP GOLDSWORTHY Cundaline Highway PENINSULA Cape Lambert F O R E S T I E R of the Cenozoic Robe Pisolite and Poondano Formation. ENDERBY I EAST LEWIS I Yarrie 10 DIXON I DEPUCH I ROAD Yarrie 4 Mineralization style is 'Regolith _ alluvial to beach placer mineralization' Road; sealed Point Samson Yarrie Yarrie 8 LOWENDAL Parker Point MARBLE ISLANDS Road; unsealed EAGLEHAWK I East Intercourse Island DAMPIER Hematitic conglomerate of the Neoproterozoic Eel Creek Formation (Tarcunyah Group, ROAD Callawa WEST INTERCOURSE I WICKHAM Cossack A BAR Officer Basin), which formed in a near-shore environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuwarra Red Dog Highway S38 Referral Supporting Information
    Manuwarra Red Dog Highway s38 Referral Supporting Information Revision | 1 26 November 2020 Main Roads Western Australia s38 R efe rral Sup po rti ng In fo rmatio n Main Roa ds Weste rn A us trali a s38 Referral Supporting Information Manuwarra Red Dog Highway Project No: IW217863 Document Title: s38 Referral Supporting Information Revision: 1 Document Status: Final Date: 26 November 2020 Client Name: Main Roads Western Australia Project Manager: Lisa Boulden Author: Lisa Boulden & Claire Beckett File Name: MRDH-4_EPA_ReferralSupportingInformationDocument_Rev1_Tracked_2020-11- 25.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 8th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia T +61 8 9469 4400 F +61 8 9469 4488 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved A 07/07/20 Draft for Client Review CB LB PS ADV B 11/08/20 Draft for Client Review LB ADV PS ADV C 16/09/20 Final Draft for Client Review LB ADV PS ADV 0 06/10/20 Final for Issue LB ADV PS ADV 1 26/11/20 Revised following EPA Comments HN LB PS ADV i s38 Referral Supporting Information Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan
    Report Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan Long Term Mine Planning 7 June 2018 R-PL-EN-0041 Rev 0 CLOSURE GUIDELINE CHECKLIST Report This closure plan addresses the progressive rehabilitation and closure of rail infrastructure projects associated with the Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004. In the absence of regulatory guidelines for inland infrastructure projects, this closure plan follows the report structure described within the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans May 2015 published by the Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum (now the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) and Environmental Protection Authority. The closure of mining operations, including quarries, is not within the scope of this closure plan. Closure Plan (CP) checklist Y/N Page Comments 1 Has the Checklist been endorsed by a senior Y 2 Report has been endorsed using representative within the tenement holder/operating standard Fortescue processes. company? Public Availability 2 Are you aware that from 2015 all CPs will be made N/A This report is not subject to mine closure publicly available? conditions under the Mining Act. 3 Is there any information in the CP that should not be N publicly available? 4 If “Yes” to Q3, has confidential information been N/A submitted in a separate document/section? Cover Page, Table of Contents 5 Does the CP cover page include: Y 1 This report is provided for information • Project Title only. • Company Name • Contact Details (including telephone numbers and email addresses) • Document ID and version number • Date of submission (needs to match the date of this checklist) Scope and Purpose 6 State why the CP is submitted Y 11 This plan has been provided to support the Eliwana Rail Project Public Environmental Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing the Pilbara Department of a Prefeasibility Assessment of the Potential Primary Industries and Regional Development for Irrigated Agriculture Development
    Growing the Pilbara Department of A prefeasibility assessment of the potential Primary Industries and Regional Development for irrigated agriculture development Growing the Pilbara — A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development 1 November 2017 Disclaimer The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2017 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth WA 6151 Tel: (08) 9368 3333 Email: [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au COVER (MAIN): Photo courtesy: Nathon Dyer RIGHT: Photo courtesy: Nathon Dyer Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Growing the Pilbara A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development A Pilbara Hinterland Agricultural Development Initiative Growing the Pilbara — A prefeasibility assessment of the potential for irrigated agriculture development 3 Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................... 6 Water resources ........................................................... 25 Executive summary ...................................................... 8 Groundwater ............................................................... 25 Introduction ................................................................... 10 Targeted aquifers .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area
    Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area GENO DI US IGENO IN D US IN P R S P O A R S T E O A EC AR TE RE TED CTED A INDEX INTRODUCTION 2 BOTH (INLAND) AND COASTAL / WALYARTA NYANGUMARTA HIGHWAY (KIDSON TRACK) - INLAND TREE SPECIES SPECIES PARNTARL 78 TREE SPECIES JIKILY 80 JUKURTANY 6 MAKARTU / LAKURRU1 82 YALAKURRA 8 WURTARR 84 JULUKU 10 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES JUNYJU 12 KUMPAJA 86 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES LIRRINGKIN 88 MIRNTIRRJINA 14 SHRUB SPECIES NGALYANTA 16 JIMA 90 Warning: This document may contain pictures or names of people who PAJINAWANTI 18 PIRRNYURU 92 have since passed away. WIRLINY 20 MANGARR 94 JUMPURR 22 KARLUNKARLUN 96 This project was supported by Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation, through KUMPALY 24 KARTAWURRU 98 funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme and JIMPIRRINY 26 JALKUPURTA 100 1 Indigenous Protected Areas Programme. YURTURL 28 WALYARTA (MANDORA MARSH) AND COASTAL SPECIES SHRUB SPECIES TREE SPECIES The traditional ecological knowledge contained in this publication was recorded by KARLAYIN 30 NGALINYMARRA 102 KAWARR 32 KURNTURUNGU 104 Vicki Long, ethno-botanist (Vicki Long & Associates), with the assistance of Brian PALMANGU 34 RANYJAMAYI 106 Geytenbeek, linguist. WAYALANY 36 TAMARISK 108 WARRI WARRI 38 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES Photography: Vicki Long, José Kalpers, Volker Mischker and Mamoru Matsuki, PURNTAKARNU 40 KULINYJIRR 110 unless otherwise stated. PURARRPURARR 42 YURTURL 112 JULYUNGKU 44 YURTUL 114 Coordination: José Kalpers, Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation. KALAYAKALAYA 46 JUMPURRU 116 PURTATU 48 MUNTURU 118 © All traditional and cultural knowledge in this publication is the MANGARR 50 SHRUB SPECIES intellectual property of the Nyangumarta people.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Review Document – Iron Valley Below Water Table
    AECOM Iron Valley Below Water Table Assessment on Proponent Information - Environmental Review Document – Iron Valley Below Water Table Appendix C Flora and Vegetation Studies 15-Jul-2016 Prepared for – BC Iron Ltd – ABN: 45 152 574 813 AECOM Iron Valley Below Water Table C-1 Assessment on Proponent Information - Environmental Review Document – Iron Valley Below Water Table Appendix C1 GDE Riparian Vegetation Investigation 20-Jul-2016 Prepared for – BC Iron Ltd – ABN: 45 152 574 813 Iron Valley Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem Investigation December 2015 Prepared for BC Iron Limited Report Reference: 13016-15-MOSR-1Rev0_160215 This page has been left blank intentionally. Iron Valley Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem Investigation Prepared for BC Iron Limited Job Number: 13016-15 Reference: 13016-15-MOSR-1Rev0_160215 Revision Status Rev Date Description Author(s) Reviewer A 15/12/2015 Draft Issued for Client Review T. Bleby R. Archibald Revised Draft Issued for Client B 13/01/2016 T. Bleby R. Archibald Review Revised Draft Issued for Client C 5/02/2016 T. Bleby R. Archibald Review 0 15/02/2016 Final Issued for Information T. Bleby R. Archibald Approval Rev Date Issued to Authorised by Name Signature A 15/12/2015 L. Purves S. Pearse B 13/01/2016 L. Purves S. Pearse C 5/02/2016 L. Purves S. Pearse 0 15/02/2016 L. Purves S. Pearse © Copyright 2015 Astron Environmental Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. This document and information contained in it has been prepared by Astron Environmental Services under the terms and conditions of its contract with its client. The report is for the clients use only and may not be used, exploited, copied, duplicated or reproduced in any form or medium whatsoever without the prior written permission of Astron Environmental Services or its client.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking West: a Guide to Aboriginal Records in Western Australia
    A Guide to Aboriginal Records in Western Australia The Records Taskforce of Western Australia ¨ ARTIST Jeanette Garlett Jeanette is a Nyungar Aboriginal woman. She was removed from her family at a young age and was in Mogumber Mission from 1956 to 1968, where she attended the Mogumber Mission School and Moora Junior High School. Jeanette later moved to Queensland and gained an Associate Diploma of Arts from the Townsville College of TAFE, majoring in screen printing batik. From 1991 to present day, Jeanette has had 10 major exhibitions and has been awarded four commissions Australia-wide. Jeanette was the recipient of the Dick Pascoe Memorial Shield. Bill Hayden was presented with one of her paintings on a Vice Regal tour of Queensland. In 1993 several of her paintings were sent to Iwaki in Japan (sister city of Townsville in Japan). A recent major commission was to create a mural for the City of Armadale (working with Elders and students from the community) to depict the life of Aboriginal Elders from 1950 to 1980. Jeanette is currently commissioned by the Mundaring Arts Centre to work with students from local schools to design and paint bus shelters — the established theme is the four seasons. Through her art, Jeanette assists Aboriginal women involved in domestic and traumatic situations, to express their feelings in order to commence their journey of healing. Jeanette currently lives in Northam with her family and is actively working as an artist and art therapist in that region. Jeanette also lectures at the O’Connor College of TAFE. Her dream is to have her work acknowledged and respected by her peers and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto Iron Ore
    Rio Tinto Iron Ore Brockman Syncline 4 – Revised Proposal Assessment on Proponent Information Environmental Review Document Hamersley Iron Pty Limited 152 – 158 St Georges Terrace, Perth GPO Box A42, Perth, WA 6837 July 2014 RTIO-HSE-0209902 Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared by Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Rio Tinto), on behalf of Hamersley Iron Pty Limited (Hamersley Iron), specifically for the Brockman Syncline 4 Iron Ore Project. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to without the express approval of Rio Tinto, unless the report has been released for referral and assessment of proposals. Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer/s Date To Whom Date A ‐ D M. Palandri T. Souster/P. Royce 02/12/13 E ‐ F T. Souster Project Team 08/01/14 1 T. Souster OEPA 04/02/2014 2 T. Souster OEPA 21/02/2014 T. Souster/A. OEPA 11/07/2014 3‐4 T. Souster/P. Royce 11/07/14 Featherstone July 2014 ii Brockman Syncline 4 – Revised Proposal API Environmental Review RTIO‐HSE‐0209902 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROPONENT DETAILS ................................................................................................................1 1.2 THE BROCKMAN SYNCLINE 4 PROJECT .....................................................................................1 2 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION................................................................................................... 6 2.1 PROVISION
    [Show full text]