Climate Change and the Environment - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change and the Environment - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company Climate Change and the Environment - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company Home Contact Downloads GRI Index UNGC Index Site Map Glossary corporate.ford.com Sustainability 2011/12 CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE ENVIRONMENT Design for Lifecycle Sustainability Climate Change Greening Our Products Greening Our Operations Data Climate Change 105 miles per Voice: Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri and the gallon Environment equivalent achieved by Focus Electric, which we began selling this year Ford is focused on minimizing the environmental impacts of 100 percent our vehicles and operations, including reducing our of Ford Motor Company vehicles built in contribution to climate change. North America have soy foam in their seat cushions and backs, as of 2011 Ford is committed to doing our part to prevent or reduce the potential for environmental, economic and social harm due to climate change. We have a science-based strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from our products and operations that focuses on doing our share to stabilize carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere. We are on track to meet the Vehicle CO2 Reductions central elements of our strategy: Each of our new vehicles is a leader, or among the leaders, in fuel economy, and we are reducing GHG emissions across our We reduced fleet-average global product portfolio. We have also set a goal to reduce our facility CO2 CO2 emissions from our emissions by 30 percent per vehicle by 2025 compared to a 2010 baseline, 2011 model year U.S. new building on our reduction of 31 percent from 2000 to 2010. vehicles by 9 percent compared to the 2007 We are also committed to reducing the overall environmental footprint of our model year. vehicles and operations across a range of environmental issues. For example, we continue to increase the use of sustainable materials in our vehicles. And, we reduced waste to landfill by 20 percent per vehicle from 2010 to 2011 and expect Ford Focus ECOnetic to reduce it again by 10 percent per vehicle in 2012. We are also continuing to reduce VOC emissions from our operations through the use of innovative We introduced the Ford technologies. Focus ECOnetic, which delivers fuel economy of In this section we discuss our approach to the issue of climate change and the 3.4L/100km and is the most ways we are working to reduce the environmental footprint of our products and fuel-efficient non-hybrid operations. family car available in Europe. Facilities Goals We committed to reduce our facility CO2 emissions by 30 percent from 2010 to 2025 on a per-vehicle basis and average energy consumed per vehicle by 25 percent from 2011 to 2016 globally. http://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2011-12/environment[13/06/2012 19:58:05] Climate Change and the Environment - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company Sustainable Materials We now use at least 25 percent recycled-content seat fabrics in all new or redesigned vehicles sold in North America. Home > Climate Change and the Environment http://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2011-12/environment[13/06/2012 19:58:05] Design for Lifecycle Sustainability - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company Home Contact Downloads GRI Index UNGC Index Site Map Glossary corporate.ford.com Sustainability 2011/12 CLIMATE CHANGE AND Design for Lifecycle Sustainability THE ENVIRONMENT Design for Lifecycle We use a lifecycle approach to assess and minimize the total adverse impacts Sustainability of our vehicles from a sustainability perspective – from raw materials extraction Related Links Quantifying Our through manufacturing and use to end of life. This approach considers and This Report Environmental Impacts works to minimize negative impacts upfront in product design decisions. Called Eco-driving Design for Sustainability (DfS), the approach is integrated and holistic, to Product Sustainability Index Greening Our Operations ensure that we achieve a balance between environmental, social and economic Logistics Climate Change aspects in our product development process. Product Sustainability Index Greening Our Products Progress and Performance – We are continuing to advance how we apply DfS principles. For example, we developed a Product Vehicles Greening Our Operations Sustainability Index (PSI) tool, which has been used in our European product development Supply Chain operations since 2002. This tool helps us to assess and find opportunities to reduce the impacts of Data Sustainable Materials our products over their entire lifecycle – including environmental impacts such as global warming Voice: Dr. Rajendra K. from greenhouse gas emissions, societal questions such as pedestrian protection and economic Pachauri issues such as cost of ownership. The PSI is used by the engineering teams that are responsible for product development decisions. We use other lifecycle assessment approaches in research and sustainability departments to address general strategic questions that are not necessarily linked to individual vehicle development programs. Among our product sustainability efforts, we are increasing our use of sustainable materials and eliminating undesirable materials and substances such as heavy metals and substances that are known to be common allergens. We are also working to reduce greenhouse gases and other emissions from our facilities and vehicles by developing cleaner and more energy-efficient production processes, improving the efficiency of our packaging and transportation logistics and introducing cleaner and more fuel-efficient vehicles. Downstream in our value chain, we are working with drivers to educate them on ways to increase fuel economy and reduce vehicle emissions for example through our Eco-Mode and Smart Gauge with Eco-Guide driver interface technologies and our eco-driving program. Upstream, we are working with our suppliers to increase the sustainability of our products throughout the supply chain. Home > Climate Change and the Environment > Design for Lifecycle Sustainability http://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2011-12/environment-lifecycle[13/06/2012 19:58:10] Quantifying Our Environmental Impacts - Sustainability 2011/12 - Ford Motor Company Home Contact Downloads GRI Index UNGC Index Site Map Glossary corporate.ford.com Sustainability 2011/12 CLIMATE CHANGE AND Quantifying Our Environmental Impacts THE ENVIRONMENT Design for Lifecycle The first step in improving the lifecycle impacts of our products is to understand the environmental aspects of our products and the potential environmental impacts associated with them.1 We use Sustainability Related Links lifecycle assessment to understand the impacts of our vehicles. Lifecycle assessment tracks Quantifying Our emissions generated and materials and energy consumed for a product system over its entire This Report Environmental lifecycle, from cradle to grave, including raw material acquisition, material production, product Electrification: A Closer Look Impacts manufacture, product use, product maintenance and disposal at end of life. For vehicles, this includes the environmental burdens associated with mining ores, making materials (e.g., steel, Product Sustainability Index Product Sustainability Index aluminum, brass, copper, plastics, etc.), fabricating them into parts, assembling the parts into a Vehicle Websites Climate Change vehicle, operating the vehicle over its entire lifetime, producing fuel for the vehicle, maintaining the vehicle and finally dismantling the vehicle at the end of its life, recycling and reusing materials as Ford Fiesta Greening Our Products possible and disposing of materials as necessary. Lifecycle assessment is an essential tool when Ford Focus Electric thinking about the environmental impacts of complex systems. Ford Focus (European) Greening Our Operations Ford Kuga Estimates of vehicles’ total lifecycle impacts vary depending upon the specifics of the vehicle Data analyzed and the vehicle’s powertrain and fuel type. For example, assessments of the Ford Fiesta, Ford Mondeo Voice: Dr. Rajendra K. Focus, and Mondeo – conducted using our Product Sustainability Index (PSI) tool – found Pachauri significant differences in lifecycle CO2 emissions between the three vehicle models and between different engine and fuel types within a vehicle model. In all cases the vehicle use phase produces the largest portion of lifecycle CO2 emissions (for example, 77 percent of total for the Focus diesel and 83 percent for the Mondeo gasoline). Vehicles with better fuel economy do reduce the use phase’s contribution to lifecycle CO2 emissions, however, the use phase remains the dominant phase for most environmental impacts. See the table below for comparisons of lifecycle CO2 emissions across these three vehicles. Lifecycle CO2 Emissions Comparison across Vehicle Models, Engines, and Fuel Types Vehicle Model Engine Fuel Type Lifecycle CO2 emissions 2011 Ford Fiesta 1.25 L Gasoline 30 metric tons * 2011 Ford Fiesta 1.6 L Diesel 21 metric tons 2011 Ford Focus 1.6 L Gasoline 32 metric tons 2011 Ford Focus 1.6 L Diesel 27 metric tons 2011 Ford Kuga 2.0 L Diesel 36 metric tons 2011 Ford Mondeo 2.0 L Gasoline 42 metric tons 2011 Ford Mondeo 2.0 L Diesel 37 metric tons * 1 metric ton = 1,000 kg = 0.98 U.K. tons = 1.1 U.S. tons The PSI results also show that these vehicles made progress on multiple aspects of sustainability compared to the previous models. For more information on PSI please see the PSI section Assessing the Lifecycle Emissions of Electrified Vehicles Assessing
Recommended publications
  • Global Mobility Through Changing Times Sustainability Report 2014/15
    Sustainability Report 2014/15 c d b ] e a Home Year in Strategy and MOBILITY PRODUCT QUALITY CLIMATE CHANGE AND OUR PEOPLE SUPPLY CHAIN COMMUNITIES Review Governance AND SAFETY ENVIRONMENT Global Mobility Through Changing Times Sustainability Report 2014/15 We want to change how the world moves. Again. “At Ford, mobility is about far more than motion. It is really about progress. Human progress.” – Mark Fields, President and Chief Executive Officer ? Spotlight Stories We challenged software developers to help The new F-150 is Ford’s toughest, most capable accident victims during the “golden hour” in – and most sustainable – truck ever. India. Ford provides tools, technology and training to We’re developing a globally mobile workforce Can electric bikes link multi-modal travel for help drivers perform their best. to deliver innovation. commuters? We’re experimenting to find out. @ Two-Minute Summary We are driving to be both a product company and a mobility company. Our vision is nothing less than to change the way the world moves. At Ford, we view this as the ultimate opportunity. In fact it is as big of an opportunity as when our founder put the world on wheels more than a century ago. Take a quick look at what we’ve achieved this year... Innovating Mobility Solutions In early 2015, we announced Ford Smart Mobility, which is using innovation to take Ford to the next level in connectivity, mobility, autonomous vehicles, big data and the customer experience. We view the disruption that’s taking place in mobility as something to embrace – not fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES SAFETY RECALL for SELECT 2020 FORD RANGER, F-150 and EXPEDITION VEHICLES
    4/9/2020 Ford Motor Company Issues Safety Recall for Select 2020 Ford Ranger, F-150 and Expedition Vehicles | Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES SAFETY RECALL FOR SELECT 2020 FORD RANGER, F-150 AND EXPEDITION VEHICLES Apr 7, 2020 | DEARBORN, Mich. DEARBORN, Mich., April 7, 2020 – Ford Motor Company is issuing a safety recall for select 2020 vehicles. They include 2020 Ford Ranger and 2020 F-150 vehicles with 10-speed automatic transmission and 2020 Expedition vehicles with the police package and 10-speed automatic transmission. Units equipped with a rotary gearshift dial are not affected. In affected vehicles, a clip that locks the gearshift cable to the transmission may not be fully seated. Over time, a partially seated clip may allow the transmission to be in a gear state different from the gearshift position selected by the driver. This could allow the driver to move the shifter to Park and remove the ignition key, without the transmission gear actually being in Park. If the parking brake is not applied in those cases, the vehicle could move unintentionally, increasing the risk of injury or crash. Ford is not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition. This action affects 55,158 vehicles in the United States and federal territories, 12,090 in Canada and 681 in Mexico. Affected vehicles include: 2020 Ford Ranger vehicles built at Michigan Assembly Plant from Feb. 28 to March 18, 2020 2020 Ford F-150 vehicles built at Dearborn Truck Plant from Feb. 18 to March 19, 2020, and Kansas City Assembly Plant from Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Issues Two Safety Recalls and Two Safety Compliance Recalls in North America
    Aug 31, 2017 | DEARBORN, Mich. Ford Issues Two Safety Recalls and Two Safety Compliance Recalls in North America DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 31, 2017 – Ford Motor Company is issuing two safety recalls and two safety compliance recalls in North America. Details are as follows: 2017 Ford F-150 and Mustang vehicles • Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 935 2017 Ford F-150 and Mustang vehicles for ARC passenger air bag inflators. Ford was notified by Takata, a supplier that uses the inflators in airbag modules, of an abnormal deployment of ARC’s passenger airbag inflator during testing conducted at Takata’s engineering facility. • In the affected vehicles, the ARC inflator may rupture during a front passenger airbag deployment resulting from a crash which may result in metal fragments striking vehicle occupants and causing serious injury and death. • Ford is not aware of any accidents or injuries associated with this issue. • Affected vehicles include: • 2017 Ford F-150 built at Kansas City Assembly Plant, July 20, 2017 to Aug. 1, 2017 • 2017 Ford Mustang built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant, July 20, 2017 to Aug. 1, 2017 • The recall involves approximately 935 vehicles in North America, including 650 in the United States and federalized territories, 279 in Canada and six in Mexico. The Ford reference number for this recall is 17S26. • Dealers will replace passenger airbag modules. 2017 Ford Explorer, Taurus and Police Interceptor Utility and Sedan vehicles • Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 263 2017 Ford Explorer, Taurus and Police Interceptor Utility and Sedan vehicles with incorrect steering gear heat shield fasteners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message to UAW Members at Ford
    FORD CONTRACT SUMMARY: HOURLY WORKERS NOVEMBER 2019 HIGHLIGHTS ● New Jobs/New Investments: Over $6 billion of product investment creating or re- taining over 8,500 jobs. Nineteen facilities will receive investments. ● Ratification Bonus: The contract establish- es a ratification bonus of $9,000 for senior- ity employees and $3,500 for temporary employees. ● Wage increases: The contract provides for 3% GWIs in the second and fourth years of the contract and 4% lump sums in the first and third years for eligible permanent seniority employees. The 2019 UAW Ford Hourly National Negotiating Committee. ● Health Care: There will be no reduction in health care benefits or increase in costs to members. New discount costs for retail clinics and telemedicine. ● Temporary Workers: Current temporary A Message to UAW Members workers are eligible to become full-time seniority employees with the potential to reach top rate during the life of the con- at Ford tract. Dear Brothers and Sisters: ● Progression: All current permanent employees will grow in to parity in the life of the contract. Your bargaining committee appreciates the solidarity of our membership ● Profit Sharing Formula Maintained as we worked to achieve key gains through the collective bargaining pro- cess. ● Pension/TESPHE: A one-time contribution of $1,000 to the Tax-Efficient Savings Plan From the outset, your brothers and sisters, Local leaders, and bargaining for Hourly Employees (TESPHE) accounts team members identified key areas of concern to focus on throughout this for employees hired or rehired before Nov. process: a clear pathway for temporary workers to permanent status, short- 19, 2007 or in a skilled classification prior ening the in-progression period, maintaining our current health care benefits to Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS in NORTH AMERICA
    6/10/2020 Ford Motor Company Issues Two Safety Recalls in North America | Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA Jun 10, 2020 | DEARBORN, Mich. DEARBORN, Mich., June 10, 2020 – Ford Motor Company is issuing two safety recalls in North America. Details are as follows: Select 2011-15 Ford and Lincoln vehicles for a door latch issue Affected vehicles may not have had all door latches replaced or correctly replaced when repaired by dealerships under safety recalls 15S16 or 16S30. Safety recalls 15S16 and 16S30 were issued to replace door latches with latch pawl spring tabs that were susceptible to cracking and failure in areas with high thermal loads (i.e., a combination of outdoor air temperature and solar radiation). A door latch with a fractured pawl spring tab typically results in a “door will not close” condition. If the door latches after repeated attempts to shut it, there is potential for the door to unlatch while driving, increasing the risk of injury. Ford is not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition. This action affects approximately 2.15 million vehicles in the United States and federal territories. Affected vehicles are as follows: 2011-14 Ford Fiesta vehicles built at Cuautitlán Assembly Plant, Jan. 26, 2010, to Oct. 31, 2013 2012-15 Ford Focus vehicles built at Michigan Assembly Plant, Oct. 4, 2010, to Jan. 31, 2015 2013-14 Ford Fusion vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant, May 11, 2012, to Oct. 31, 2013 2013-14 Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant, July 19, 2012, to Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Powered, Electric, Hybrid and Plug-In
    A WORLD FIRST: FORD’S MICHIGAN ASSEMBLY TO BUILD GAS- POWERED, ELECTRIC, HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLES Ford Motor Company’s retooled Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, Mich., becomes the world’s first plant to build not only fuel-efficient gas-powered vehicles, but three production versions of electrified vehicles – battery electric, hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles Production of the all-new global Ford Focus, in four-door and five-door versions, is under way Michigan Assembly will be home to the with sales to begin early next year. The Focus all-new global Ford Focus. Electric battery electric vehicle goes into Click here to download related images. production late next year followed by a new hybrid and plug-in hybrid in late 2012 Michigan Assembly provides a new level of manufacturing flexibility, allowing it to build multiple models to quickly and efficiently meet changing consumer preferences Ford, Detroit Edison and Xtreme Power teaming up to establish one of Michigan’s largest solar-powered generation systems and electric vehicle charging stations Ford and the United Auto Workers developed a framework of new and leading-edge operating practices at Michigan Assembly to produce the new Focus and other vehicles with industry-leading quality and efficiency WAYNE, Mich., Dec. 14, 2010 – Ford Motor Company’s Michigan Assembly Plant, which once churned out large SUVs, has completed a $550 million transformation that will make it the world’s first factory to build not only fuel-efficient gas-powered cars, but also three production versions of electrified vehicles including battery electric, hybrid and plug-in hybrid.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES ONE SAFETY COMPLIANCE RECALL and TWO SAFETY RECALLS in NORTH AMERICA
    10/13/2020 Ford Motor Company Issues One Safety Compliance Recall and Two Safety Recalls in North America | Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES ONE SAFETY COMPLIANCE RECALL AND TWO SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA Sep 30, 2020 | DEARBORN, Mich. DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 30, 2020 – Ford Motor Company is issuing one safety compliance recall and two safety recalls in North America. Safety compliance recall for multiple 2020 model year vehicles for intermittent rearview camera operation Affected vehicles have insufficient electrical conductivity within the printed circuit board internal to the camera. A rearview camera that intermittently displays a blank or distorted image would not comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and requires corrective action by the manufacturer. Ford is not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition. This action affects 620,246 vehicles in the U.S. and federal territories, 76,566 in Canada and 4,302 in Mexico. Affected 2020 vehicles include: Ford Explorer vehicles built at Chicago Assembly Plant from Nov. 16, 2019, to May 18, 2020 Ford F-150 vehicles built at Dearborn Assembly Plant from Oct. 26, 2019, to May 18, 2020, and Kansas City Assembly Plant from Nov. 2, 2019, to May 18, 2020 Ford Mustang vehicles built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant from Nov. 18, 2019, to May 26, 2020 Ford Transit vehicles built at Kansas City Assembly Plant from Oct. 28, 2019, to May 20, 2020. Ford Super Duty vehicles built at Kentucky Truck Plant from Nov. 3, 2019, to May 18, 2020, and Ohio Assembly Plant from Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 UAW-FORD Unpublished Letters
    2015 UAW - FORD Unpublished Letters 2015 UAW-FORD Unpublished Letters Table of Contents Section Pages Working Agreement Joint Programs Benefits Unpublished Letters Topic Page # Working Agreement Unpublished Letters 1U 2015 Collective Bargaining Agreement 2U 2015 Settlement Agreement 3U-13U Administrative Guidelines - PS&L Chairperson's Pay - Unplanned Overtime (Allerton to 14U Settles) Appointed Representation Structure at Brownstown/Parts Depots (Allerton to Settles) 15U Current And Future Product Commitment (Allerton to Settles) 16U-25U Entry Level Employee Conversion to New Traditional Status (Allerton to Settles) 26U-32U Outsourcing Moratorium (Allerton to Settles) 33U Remote email access - UAW Representatives (Allerton to Settles) 34U Sourcing - Advanced Manufacturing/Product Intelligence and Sourcing Alignment 35U-36U (Allerton to Settles) J Three Crew Schedules - Jury Duty (Allerton to Settles) 37U-38U I ! Joint Programs 39U Line Work Experience for Engineers (Allerton to Settles) 40U Benefits 41U Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit (AICU) Model (Swartout to Settles) 42U-43U Handling of Benefits for Alternate Work Schedule Employees (Swartout to Settles) 44U-54U Handling of Benefits for Alternate Work Schedule (3 Crew) Employees at Michigan Truck 55U-57U Plant (MTP) (Quarterman to Pokerwinski) Life Insurance Appeals and the UAW-Ford Group Life and Disability Appeal Committee 58U (Popp to Settles) Pension Eligibility Service for Certain Hourly Employees who returned to Ford from Ford 59U I New Holland Inc. (Swartout to Settles) Prescription Drug Management Understandings (Swartout to Settles) 60U Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan Funding (Swartout to Settles) 61U Working Agreement 1U UNPUBLISHED xx/xx/xxxx Mr. Jimmy Settles Vice President and Director UAW-Ford Department 8000 East Jefferson Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48214 Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company, a Global Automotive Industry Leader Based in Dearborn, Mich., Manufactures Or Distributes Automobiles Across Six Continents
    FORD VISIT OUR WEBSITE (HTTPS://CORPORATE.FORD.COM/) Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Mich., manufactures or distributes automobiles across six continents. With about 175,000 employees and more than 65 plants worldwide, the company’s automotive brands include Ford and Lincoln. The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. Ford is laser-focused on building a strong business that delivers great products leading in quality, fuel efficiency, safety, smart design, value, and that contribute to a better world. Ford Motor Company Location Employees Ford Credit National Recovery Center Mesa AZ 106 Arizona Proving Ground Wittmann AZ 16 Ford Credit Colorado Springs Business Center Colorado 381 Springs CO Denver High Velocity Center VC Denver CO 29 Denver Regional Office Greenwood 20 Village CO Hartford High Velocity Center Windsor 34 Locks CT Washington Affairs Washington 19 DC Lakeland High Velocity Center Davenport FL 33 / Ford Motor Company Location Employees Ford,FC&FCSD Orl Reg Ofc Maitland FL 27 Ford Credit Tampa Business Center Tampa FL 509 Atlanta High Velocity Center McDonough 35 GA Southeast Regional Office Milton GA 67 Chicago Assembly Plant Chicago IL 4000 Chicago High Velocity Center Chicago IL 27 Chicago Stamping Plant Chicago 1300 Heights IL Chicago Regional Office Downers 75 Grove IL Evansville High Velocity Center Princeton IN 34 Kansas City Regional Office Overland 20 Park KS Kansas City High Velocity Center Shawnee KS 56 Kentucky Truck Plant Louisville KY
    [Show full text]
  • Release at 00:01 A
    NEWS www.twitter.com/ford www.facebook.com/ford www.instagram.com/ford www.medium.com/@ford Ford Motor Company Issues One Safety Compliance Recall and Two Safety Recalls in North America DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 30, 2020 – Ford Motor Company is issuing one safety compliance recall and two safety recalls in North America. Safety compliance recall for multiple 2020 model year vehicles for intermittent rearview camera operation Affected vehicles have insufficient electrical conductivity within the printed circuit board internal to the camera. A rearview camera that intermittently displays a blank or distorted image would not comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and requires corrective action by the manufacturer. Ford is not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition. This action affects 620,246 vehicles in the U.S. and federal territories, 76,566 in Canada and 4,302 in Mexico. Affected 2020 vehicles include: • Ford Explorer vehicles built at Chicago Assembly Plant from Nov. 16, 2019, to May 18, 2020 • Ford F-150 vehicles built at Dearborn Assembly Plant from Oct. 26, 2019, to May 18, 2020, and Kansas City Assembly Plant from Nov. 2, 2019, to May 18, 2020 • Ford Mustang vehicles built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant from Nov. 18, 2019, to May 26, 2020 • Ford Transit vehicles built at Kansas City Assembly Plant from Oct. 28, 2019, to May 20, 2020. • Ford Super Duty vehicles built at Kentucky Truck Plant from Nov. 3, 2019, to May 18, 2020, and Ohio Assembly Plant from Oct. 30, 2019, to May 18, 2020 • Ford Expedition vehicles built at Kentucky Truck Plant from Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive Weight and Drag Reduction
    © IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief T18 – January 2011 - www.etsap.org Automotive Weight and Drag Reduction HIGHLIGHTS TECHNOLOGY STATUS – Weight and drag reduction are widely recognised as cost effective ways of reducing automotive energy consumption, however they have not always been given as high priority as other vehicle characteristics. The introduction of CO2 emissions legislation for passenger cars in Europe has started to reverse this trend with several recent models being lighter than their predecessors and manufacturers increasingly striving to achieve low aerodynamic drag coefficients. However improvements in drag coefficients of passenger cars over the years have largely been offset by increasing frontal areas. Europe has also introduced legislation to mandate the reduction of rolling resistance through the use of low rolling resistance tyres for all vehicle types and tyre pressure monitoring systems on passenger cars. Typically over half of the energy used by large goods vehicles is to overcome rolling resistance and a further third is aerodynamic drag on higher speed roads so they too can benefit from these technologies. PERFORMANCE AND COSTS – While more expensive materials such as magnesium and carbon fibre can be used to reduce weight, many reductions can be achieved through optimising design without increased cost. It is also important to realise the secondary weight reduction in components such as the powertrain, braking system and suspension system which can be achieved as a result of an overall reduction in vehicle weight. Fitment of low rolling resistance tyres and tyre pressure monitoring systems to passenger cars can each offer 2-3% reductions in CO2. Aerodynamic drag reduction can be achieved through detailed wind tunnel design work and does not necessarily require an increase in vehicle production costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Contribution of the Ford Motor Company Michigan Assembly Plant to the Michigan Economy
    Economic Contribution of the Ford Motor Company Michigan Assembly Plant to the Michigan Economy Prepared for: Michigan Economic Development Corporation and Ford Motor Company Prepared by: 3005 Boardwalk, Suite 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Kim Hill Bernard Swiecki Deb Menk Joshua Cregger Michael Schultz March 2013 All statements, findings, and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Ford Motor Company or MEDC. Contents List of Figures and Tables .................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 Section 1: North American Industry Overview ............................................................................... 5 The North American Automobile Industry ................................................................................. 5 Recent North American Developments ...................................................................................... 5 Sales and Analysis ................................................................................................................... 6 Employment ............................................................................................................................ 6 Section 2:
    [Show full text]