West Midlands As at 25 September 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Midlands As at 25 September 2016 Percentage Change in Rateable Value in All Sectors for West Midlands as at 25 September 2016 RV Change Key Area (%) 1 Herefordshire, County of UA 2.4% 2 Shropshire UA 13.4% 3 Stoke-on-Trent UA 5.4% 4 Telford and Wrekin UA 4.5% Staffordshire 5 Cannock Chase -3.4% 6 East Staffordshire 4.6% 7 Lichfield 7.4% 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme 4.7% 9 South Staffordshire 4.7% 10 Stafford 3.5% 11 Staffordshire Moorlands 15.4% 12 Tamworth 2.6% Warwickshire 13 North Warwickshire 8.0% 14 Nuneaton and Bedworth 0.9% 15 Rugby 1.5% 16 Stratford-on-Avon 5.1% 17 Warwick 3.5% West Midlands (Met County) 18 Birmingham 4.1% 19 Coventry 3.4% 20 Dudley -2.5% 21 Sandwell -1.0% 22 Solihull -2.9% 23 Walsall 9.1% 24 Wolverhampton 3.5% Worcestershire 25 Bromsgrove -5.8% 26 Malvern Hills 6.1% 27 Redditch -5.8% 28 Worcester 0.9% 29 Wychavon 2.8% 30 Wyre Forest -0.5% The percentage change in Rateable Value (RV) is based on the total RV of the 2010 Rating Lists and the 2017 Rating Lists in each billing authority after the Revaluation Programme. Percentage Change in Rateable Value in the Retail Sector for West Midlands as at 25 September 2016 RV Change Key Area (%) 1 Herefordshire, County of UA -6.9% 2 Shropshire UA 9.1% 3 Stoke-on-Trent UA -2.4% 4 Telford and Wrekin UA 3.6% Staffordshire 5 Cannock Chase -3.1% 6 East Staffordshire -7.3% 7 Lichfield -4.2% 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme -9.5% 9 South Staffordshire 11.7% 10 Stafford -3.0% 11 Staffordshire Moorlands 5.6% 12 Tamworth -7.3% Warwickshire 13 North Warwickshire 15.0% 14 Nuneaton and Bedworth -11.0% 15 Rugby -4.4% 16 Stratford-on-Avon 0.1% 17 Warwick -2.6% West Midlands (Met County) 18 Birmingham 5.2% 19 Coventry -2.7% 20 Dudley -2.5% 21 Sandwell 1.0% 22 Solihull -4.5% 23 Walsall -1.8% 24 Wolverhampton -0.2% Worcestershire 25 Bromsgrove -13.4% 26 Malvern Hills 6.8% 27 Redditch -10.2% 28 Worcester -8.2% 29 Wychavon -4.5% 30 Wyre Forest -6.2% The percentage change in Rateable Value (RV) is based on the total RV of the 2010 Rating Lists and the 2017 Rating Lists in each billing authority after the Revaluation Programme. Percentage Change in Rateable Value in the Industry Sector for West Midlands as at 25 September 2016 RV Change Key Area (%) 1 Herefordshire, County of UA 2.6% 2 Shropshire UA 17.4% 3 Stoke-on-Trent UA 5.8% 4 Telford and Wrekin UA 3.2% Staffordshire 5 Cannock Chase 2.3% 6 East Staffordshire 9.3% 7 Lichfield 13.4% 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme 10.3% 9 South Staffordshire -0.8% 10 Stafford 3.2% 11 Staffordshire Moorlands 12.7% 12 Tamworth 12.2% Warwickshire 13 North Warwickshire 9.7% 14 Nuneaton and Bedworth 5.7% 15 Rugby 5.3% 16 Stratford-on-Avon 11.3% 17 Warwick 7.5% West Midlands (Met County) 18 Birmingham 2.1% 19 Coventry 5.8% 20 Dudley -4.0% 21 Sandwell -3.6% 22 Solihull -1.3% 23 Walsall 0.6% 24 Wolverhampton 0.3% Worcestershire 25 Bromsgrove -8.3% 26 Malvern Hills 2.3% 27 Redditch -7.7% 28 Worcester 3.5% 29 Wychavon -1.6% 30 Wyre Forest -1.8% The percentage change in Rateable Value (RV) is based on the total RV of the 2010 Rating Lists and the 2017 Rating Lists in each billing authority after the Revaluation Programme. Percentage Change in Rateable Value in the Office Sector for West Midlands as at 25 September 2016 RV Change Key Area (%) 1 Herefordshire, County of UA 4.5% 2 Shropshire UA 4.7% 3 Stoke-on-Trent UA 1.4% 4 Telford and Wrekin UA -3.6% Staffordshire 5 Cannock Chase 3.7% 6 East Staffordshire 0.7% 7 Lichfield -18.0% 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme -5.2% 9 South Staffordshire 15.5% 10 Stafford -1.8% 11 Staffordshire Moorlands 22.3% 12 Tamworth -12.4% Warwickshire 13 North Warwickshire -3.6% 14 Nuneaton and Bedworth -3.3% 15 Rugby -17.7% 16 Stratford-on-Avon -6.0% 17 Warwick -6.3% West Midlands (Met County) 18 Birmingham -10.0% 19 Coventry -5.2% 20 Dudley -14.1% 21 Sandwell -2.0% 22 Solihull -10.2% 23 Walsall 11.5% 24 Wolverhampton 6.5% Worcestershire 25 Bromsgrove -17.7% 26 Malvern Hills -1.3% 27 Redditch -7.3% 28 Worcester -3.9% 29 Wychavon 9.2% 30 Wyre Forest -2.9% The percentage change in Rateable Value (RV) is based on the total RV of the 2010 Rating Lists and the 2017 Rating Lists in each billing authority after the Revaluation Programme. Percentage Change in Rateable Value in the Other Sector for West Midlands as at 25 September 2016 RV Change Key Area (%) 1 Herefordshire, County of UA 11.3% 2 Shropshire UA 16.1% 3 Stoke-on-Trent UA 16.1% 4 Telford and Wrekin UA 11.5% Staffordshire 5 Cannock Chase -13.0% 6 East Staffordshire 9.6% 7 Lichfield 18.5% 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme 15.2% 9 South Staffordshire 8.0% 10 Stafford 10.8% 11 Staffordshire Moorlands 22.0% 12 Tamworth 11.9% Warwickshire 13 North Warwickshire 5.3% 14 Nuneaton and Bedworth 8.1% 15 Rugby 6.9% 16 Stratford-on-Avon 7.7% 17 Warwick 15.3% West Midlands (Met County) 18 Birmingham 17.0% 19 Coventry 13.1% 20 Dudley 4.6% 21 Sandwell 3.2% 22 Solihull 3.9% 23 Walsall 34.2% 24 Wolverhampton 10.3% Worcestershire 25 Bromsgrove 6.7% 26 Malvern Hills 9.9% 27 Redditch 8.2% 28 Worcester 13.2% 29 Wychavon 12.8% 30 Wyre Forest 9.5% The percentage change in Rateable Value (RV) is based on the total RV of the 2010 Rating Lists and the 2017 Rating Lists in each billing authority after the Revaluation Programme..
Recommended publications
  • Activities and Support in Nuneaton & Bedworth for People Living with Dementia and Their Carers
    Nuneaton and Bedworth Activities and support in Nuneaton & Bedworth for people living with Dementia and their carers Dementia Groups & Cafes for people living with Dementia and their Carers Dementia Day Opportunities Friday Friends The service offers support in a day care set- ting which aims to assist independent living Friday Friends is run by donations by in the community for as long as possible enthusiastic volunteers, and has been through opportunities to: running successfully since 2015. Help keep the memory at optimum lev- We use a large sunny room in Bulkington els. Village Conference Centre, CV12 Socialise with others in similar 9JB (Behind Bulkington Library). No need to circumstances. book just come along but maybe check the Join in group activities and have fun. dates with us to make sure. If you would like a programme of dates and events get in Activities include reminiscence therapy, mu- touch by phone or email. Entrance is free sic and movement, arts and crafts. but £1 is asked for unlimited refreshments. Come along and join us on the First and Contact: Age UK Warwickshire, 8 Clemens Third Fridays of each month (except Bank Street, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, Holidays) 1.30pm - 3.30pm in an informal CV31 2DL. Tel: 01926 458 100. atmosphere for refreshments, social support, entertainment, talks and activities and Mondays 9.00am to 3.00pm occasional trips out. Pallet Drive Club The First Friday of the month we often have NCF (Nuneaton Christian Fellowship talks and entertainment along with light Church) Church Building refreshments in our cafe area. Pallet Drive The Third Friday of the month we have our Nuneaton.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond, Hallmark Diamond Bus Limited; Shady Lane Property Limited, Hallbridge Way, Tipton Road, Tividale, West Midlands, B69 3HW
    Midlands Diamond PD0001374, PD1028090 Diamond, Hallmark Diamond Bus Limited; Shady Lane Property Limited, Hallbridge Way, Tipton Road, Tividale, West Midlands, B69 3HW Part of the Rotala Group plc. Depots: Diamond Kidderminster Island Drive, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY10 1EZ Redditch Plymouth Road, Redditch, Worcestershire, B97 4PA Tamworth Common Barn Farm, Tamworth Road, Hopwas, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS14 9PX Tividale Cross Quays Business Park, Hallbridge Way, Tipton Road, Tividale, West Midlands, B69 3HW Store: John’s Lane, Tividale, West Midlands, DY4 7PS Chassis Type: Optare Solo M780 Body Type: Optare Solo Fleet No: Reg No: Seating: New: Depot: Livery: Prev Owner: 20010 YJ56AUA B28F 2006 Tividale Diamond DUN, 2012 Previous Owners: DUN, 2012: Dunn-Line, 2012 Chassis Type: Optare Solo M960SR Body Type: Optare Solo SR Fleet No: Reg No: Seating: New: Depot: Livery: Prev Owner: 20014 YJ10MFY B30F 2010 Redditch Diamond 20015 YJ10MFX B30F 2010 Redditch Diamond Chassis Type: Alexander-Dennis Dart SLF Body Type: Alexander-Dennis Pointer Fleet No: Reg No: Seating: New: Depot: Livery: Prev Owner: 20023 SN05HDD B29F 2005 Tividale Diamond DVB, 2010 Previous Owners: DVB, 2010: Davidson Buses, 2010 Chassis Type: Optare Solo M960SR Body Type: Optare Solo SR Fleet No: Reg No: Seating: New: Depot: Livery: Prev Owner: 20027 YJ10MFZ B30F 2010 Redditch Diamond Chassis Type: Optare Solo M790SE Body Type: Optare Solo SE Fleet No: Reg No: Seating: New: Depot: Livery: Prev Owner: 20050 YJ60KBZ B27F 2010 Tividale Diamond RGL, 2017 20051 YJ60KHA B27F 2010 Tividale Diamond RGL, 2017 20052 YJ60KHB B27F 2010 Kidderminster Diamond RGL, 2017 20053 YJ60KHC B27F 2010 Tividale Diamond RGL, 2017 Previous Owners: RGL, 2017: Regal Busways, 2017 Fleet list template © Copyright 2021 ukbuses.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Robey's Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review Of
    Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr Hallam Land Management Ltd Land off Robey’s Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review of North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment March 2015 1 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date -draft 06.03.15 BC 06.03.15 BC A FINAL 10.03.15 BC 10.03.15 BC 2 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is a Landscape Appraisal & Review of the North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment (2015) which has been prepared by North Warwickshire Borough Council. 1.2 This report has been prepared by FPCR Environment & Design Ltd on behalf of our client, Hallam Land Management Ltd (HLM). 1.3 HLM have an interest in land to the north of the B5000 (Tamworth Road) to the east of the Tamworth. This area of land is hereon referred to as the ‘site’ and is shown in Figure 1. The local and wider context around the site, as identified in Figure 1, is referred to as the ‘Study Area.’ 1.3 The site comprises agricultural land that lies between the urban area of Tamworth to the west and the M42 Motorway to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme
    Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Assessment Report
    Corporate Assessment Report March 2008 Corporate Assessment Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council The Audit Commission is an independent body responsible for ensuring that public money is spent economically, efficiently and effectively, to achieve high quality local services for the public. Our remit covers around 11,000 bodies in England, which between them spend more than £180 billion of public money each year. Our work covers local government, health, housing, community safety and fire and rescue services. As an independent watchdog, we provide important information on the quality of public services. As a driving force for improvement in those services, we provide practical recommendations and spread best practice. As an independent auditor, we ensure that public services are good value for money and that public money is properly spent. Copies of this report If you require further copies of this report, or a copy in large print, in Braille, on tape, or in a language other than English, please call 0844 798 7070. © Audit Commission 2008 For further information on the work of the Commission please contact: Audit Commission, 1st Floor, Millbank Tower, Millbank, London SW1P 4HQ Tel: 020 7828 1212 Fax: 020 7976 6187 Textphone (minicom): 020 7630 0421 www.audit-commission.gov.uk Corporate Assessment │ Contents 3 Contents Introduction 4 Executive summary 5 Areas for improvement 7 Summary of assessment scores 8 Context 9 The locality 9 The Council 10 What is the Council, together with its partners, trying to achieve? 11 Ambition 11 Prioritisation
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Citz Tool Kit.Pdf
    Whose citizenship? ... a teacher’s toolkit Experiences from the West Midlands supporting Citizenship Education at key stage 3 Acknowledgments: Whose citizenship? … a teacher's toolkit has been the result of many workshops, discussions and school based activities in different parts of the West Midlands. We would like to thank all of the teachers who have contributed their ideas to this creative process. Whose citizenship? has been written by … Lesley Browne, Park Hall School, Solihull Whose citizenship? Ian Cornell, Park Hall School, Solihull Chris Durbin, Staffordshire LEA Alison Harrison, St John Fisher RC High, Staffordshire Sam Hayles, Park Hall School, Solihull ... a teacher’s toolkit Bev Langton, King Edward VI High, Staffordshire Elaine Miskell, Tide~ DEC, Birmingham Gay Pennell, St John Fisher RC High, Staffordshire The introduction of a new Citizenship curriculum in Secondary Schools Jenny Smedley, The Streetly School, Walsall brings with it a host of possibilities, opportunities and also dilemmas for Nicola Smith, The Streetly School, Walsall teachers. Our decisions about what we prioritise and the opportunities Gaye Tayler, King Edward VI School, Lichfield that we offer our students will often be shaped and led by our own With support from … understanding of the wider context for Citizenship Education, and why this is important for our students. Much of this area of work deals with Rowena Blencowe, Thomas Alleyne’s High, Staffordshire attitudes, values and 'dispositions to change' rather than fact and certainty. Jackie Cooper, Abbot Beyne School, Staffordshire [formerly at Churchfields This has implications for us as teachers - it requires us to think about our High School, Sandwell] own role as facilitator, questioner, enabler, and to examine our own Oliver Cowling, Wodensborough CTC, Sandwell values and understandings of the world around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1987
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The George Eliot Review English, Department of 1987 Annual Report 1987 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ger Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons "Annual Report 1987" (1987). The George Eliot Review. 78. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ger/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The George Eliot Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ANNUAL REPORT 1987 Before I began this, my 20th. annual Report, 1 looked back to my first and found, to my amusement, that it was a mere half quarto page! During that year we had visited the Amold Bennett Country, seen the play of 'Wutherlng Heights', and our Guest of Honour at the Dinner was the writer, Richard Church, a kinsman of George Eliot. Our total membership was 60. 1987 was inevitably a quieter year than 1986 - can it really be more than two years since we unveiled the Statue? At the AGM in March it seemed almost inevitable that we should be accepting the resignation of Ann Reader who had been our treasurer for ten busy years culminating in the Statue appeal. A very young 79 year old, she felt it was time to hand on the purse strings to someone younger and her meticulous books were taken over by Brenda Evans who quickly proved what an asset she is with her enthusiasm for new projects and introducing George Eliot to new groups of people.
    [Show full text]
  • North Warwickshire Noise Monthly Report (October 2020)
    December 2020 Construction noise and vibration Monthly Report – October 2020 North Warwickshire Borough Council © HS2 Ltd. gov.uk/hs2 Non-Technical Summary 2 Abbreviations and Descriptions 3 Introduction 4 1.2 Measurement Locations 5 Summary of Results 6 2.1 Summary of Measured Vibration Levels 6 2.2 Exceedances of Trigger Level 6 2.3 Complaints 6 Appendix A Site Locations 8 Appendix B Monitoring Locations 10 Appendix C Data 12 List of tables Table 1: Table of Abbreviations 3 Table 2: Monitoring Locations 5 Table 3: Summary of Measured PPV Data over the Monitoring Period 6 Table 4: Summary of Exceedances of Trigger Levels 6 Table 5: Summary of Complaints 7 OFFICIAL Page i Non-Technical Summary This Noise and Vibration Monitoring Report fulfils HS2 Limited’s commitment detailed in the Environmental Minimum Requirements (EMRs), Annex 1, Code of Construction Practice, to present the results of noise and vibration monitoring carried out within North Warwickshire Borough Council (NWBC) area during the month of October 2020. Within this period vibration monitoring was undertaken in the vicinity of the Gilson Road Test Pile Worksite where no works took place during the monitoring period. Further works, where monitoring did not take place, were undertaken at: • Coleshill junction, Watton Lane, Coleshill Road along Gypsy Lane and Chelmsley Wood next to Coleshill Heath Road (gas main diversion works); • Coleshill Hall Farm, Embankment and Junction (electricity cabling works); • Faraday Avenue, Hams Hall (electricity works); • Parkhall/Attleborough Lane (pipeline works); • Water Orton Cutting (commencement of temporary works). There were no exceedances of trigger levels as defined in Section 61 consents during the reporting period at any monitoring position.
    [Show full text]
  • Meal Provision for Older and Vulnerable Adults Scrutiny Task
    Worcestershire County Council Worcestershire Hub Scrutiny Task Group Scrutiny Report: Worcestershire Hub November 2010 www.worcestershire.gov.uk Scrutiny Task Group Membership County Council Members Bob Banks (Lead Member) Nathan Desmond Lucy Hodgson Beverley Nielsen (until April) Stephen Peters David Thain Liz Tucker (from April) District Council Co-opted Members Bromsgrove District Council Kit Taylor Malvern Hills District Council Roger Sutton Redditch Borough Council Robin King (January) Jinny Pearce (February – May) Gay Hopkins (May – August) Roger Hill (from August) Worcester City Council Geoff Williams Wychavon District Council Laurie Evans Wyre Forest District Council Graham Ballinger (January – March and from April) Jenny Greener (March – April) Officer Support Suzanne O'Leary, Overview and Scrutiny Manager Emma James and Jo Weston, Overview and Scrutiny Officers Annette Stock and Emma Breckin, Scrutiny Liaison Officers for Corporate Services Further copies of this report are available from: Overview and Scrutiny Team Legal and Democratic Services Worcestershire County Council County Hall Spetchley Road Worcester WR5 2NP Tel: 01905 766916 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.worcestershire.gov.uk/scrutiny Contents Page Foreword i Executive Summary ii - v Report of the Worcestershire Hub Scrutiny Task Group Introduction 1 Terms of Reference 1 Methodology 2 Development of the Hub including the Worcestershire Hub Shared Service 2 Differences in provision across Worcestershire, what they are and why they 3 exist? Councillors'
    [Show full text]
  • List of 100 Priority Places
    Priority Places Place Lead Authority Argyll and Bute Argyll and Bute Council Barnsley Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria County Council Bassetlaw Nottinghamshire County Council Birmingham West Midlands Combined Authority Blackburn with Darwen Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Blackpool Council Blaenau Gwent Blaenau Gwent Council Bolton Greater Manchester Combined Authority Boston Lincolnshire County Council Bradford West Yorkshire Combined Authority Burnley Lancashire County Council Calderdale West Yorkshire Combined Authority Canterbury Kent County Council Carmarthenshire Carmarthenshire Council Ceredigion Ceredigion Council Conwy Conwy County Borough Council Corby Northamptonshire County Council* Cornwall Cornwall Council County Durham Durham County Council Darlington Tees Valley Combined Authority Denbighshire Denbighshire County Council Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire County Council Doncaster Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Dudley West Midlands Combined Authority Dumfries and Galloway Dumfries and Galloway Council East Ayrshire East Ayrshire Council East Lindsey Lincolnshire County Council East Northamptonshire Northamptonshire County Council* Falkirk Falkirk Council Fenland Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Gateshead Gateshead Council Glasgow City Glasgow City Council Gravesham Kent County Council Great Yarmouth Norfolk County Council Gwynedd Gwynedd Council Harlow Essex County Council Hartlepool Tees Valley Combined Authority Hastings East Sussex County Council
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage Pregnancy in England and Wales | 1
    Teenage conception rates in England and Wales1 In England and Wales, there were 63,116 conceptions to women under the age of 20 in 2014. The conception rate for this group fell by 6.4 per cent to 37.9 conceptions per 1,000 women under-20 in 2014, continuing the overall downward trend since 2007 from 61.4 conceptions per 1,000 women. Similarly, the conception rate for under-18s — the measure predominantly used when discussing teenage pregnancy — has been falling, and is now 22.9 conceptions per 1000 women under the age of 18; its lowest level since records began in 1969, when the rate was 47.1 conceptions per 1000 women. The five areas in England and Wales with the lowest teenage conception rates are: Teenage pregnancy in 1. Hart – 5.2 per 1,000 England and Wales 2. East Dorset – 5.7 per 1,000 Teenage pregnancy rates in England and Wales 3. West Devon – 6.5 per 1,000 are at their lowest point since records began. 4. Wokingham – 8.4 per 1,000 This is due, primarily, to government action, which has improved the provision of sex and 5. Chiltern – 9 per 1,000 relationships education (SRE) and increased The five areas with the highest teenage access to contraception for young people. conception rates are: Despite this success, England and Wales still have 1. Nuneaton and Bedworth – 43 per 1,000 some of the highest teenage pregnancy rates in the developed world. There is also significant 2. Stoke on Trent – 42.4 per 1,000 disparity in teenage conception rates between 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcestershire Has Fluctuated in Size Over the Centuries
    HUMAN GENETICS IN WORCESTERSHIRE AND THE SHAKESPEARE COUNTRY I. MORGAN WATKIN County Health Department, Abet ystwyth Received7.x.66 1.INTRODUCTION THEwestern limits of Worcestershire lie about thirty miles to the east of Offa's Dyke—the traditional boundary between England and Wales —yet Evesham in the south-eastern part of the county is described by its abbot in a petition to Thomas Cromwell in as situated within the Principality of Wales. The Star Chamber Proceedings (No. 4) in the reign of Henry VII refer to the bridge of stone at Worcester by which the king's subjects crossed from England into Wales and the demonstrations against the Act of 1430 regulating navigation along the Severn were supported by large numbers of Welshmen living on the right bank of the river in Worcestershire. The object of the investigation is to ascertain whether significant genetic differences exist in the population of Worcestershire and south-western Warwickshire and, in particular, whether the people living west of the Severn are more akin to the Welsh than to the English. The possibility of determining, on genetic grounds, whether the Anglo- Saxon penetration was strongest from the south up the rivers Severn and Avon, or across the watershed from the Trent in the north, or from the east through Oxfordshire and Warwickshire is also explored. 2. THECOUNTY Worcestershirehas fluctuated in size over the centuries and Stratford-on-Avon came for a period under its jurisdiction while Shipston-on-Stour, now a Warwickshire township, remained in one of the detached portions of Worcestershire until the turn of the present century.
    [Show full text]